The application and applicability of the humanities and social sciences are not always visible in the practical world. This is especially the case in technology-dependent areas like the marine and maritime sectors. In these sectors,...
moreThe application and applicability of the humanities and social sciences are not always visible in the practical world. This is especially the case in technology-dependent areas like the marine and maritime sectors. In these sectors, control, prediction and recommendations that rely on technologies and their advancement are of the utmost importance. These sectors are, after all, those on which we rely for international trade, defence and security, sources of food and other energy requirements, like oil and gas. At first glance, it would appear that the sectors are devoid of the humanities and social sciences and that these have a minimal, if not marginal role to play. The humanities and social sciences consist of a number of subject fields like anthropology, economics, history, international relations, law, philosophy and sociology. These fields of enquiry are at times service providers to sectors when their services are needed. This relegates the fields to the cupboard of scientific investigation when long-term strategies are developed, which should not be the case. The humanities and social sciences should play a constant role in a human-dominated world. The maritime sector is, after all, human constructed. Trade routes, ports, harbours, warehouses, cranes, rail links and truck routes are not natural occurrences; neither are the technologies that constitute and sustain them. Because of the dominance of the human element, even in the marine environment, the humanities and social sciences can play a more fruitful role in creating opportunities and solving problems. What is more, it is not only the humanities and social sciences that are of importance, but also how humans view the world and react to it either through theoretical or concrete means. Here, paradigms and theories of various kinds from the humanities and social sciences also have their place.
This chapter explores these dimensions in more detail. It starts by presenting a framework, called PULSE3, for analysing the role of the humanities and social sciences in the two sectors. The paradigms of the presentations delivered at the Integrated Marine and Maritime Technologies Workshop in October 2013 are assessed. This chapter reviews the abstracts of the presentations made at the workshop. The review of the abstracts is not representative of the state of research and development in the entire sector. It is only a snapshot of it. However, it provides useful insights into current thinking and practice in the marine and maritime sectors. The purpose of this assessment is to determine the type of paradigm that was dominant. Two paradigms, rationalism and interpretivism, are identified through the assessment. Rationalism views the researcher and reality as separate, with only one reality present. Research is able to control and predict this reality. This means that an objective reality exists beyond the human mind. Interpretivism, however, notes that the researcher and reality are inseparable in that realities are mentally constructed. Multiple realities exist and, as such, knowledge of the world is intentionally constituted through researchers’ lived experiences. There is no objective meaning (Wendt, 1999; Weber, 2004; Guba and Lincoln, 2005; Lincoln et al., 2011). An overview of the ethos of analytic eclecticism is provided and how it can aid the marine and maritime sectors. After this, the role of the humanities and social sciences in the public and government policy domain is presented. This is followed by the setting of a number of beacons that the marine and maritime sectors could follow to expand the role of the humanities and social sciences. The repertoire of theories plays a central role in this, the penultimate section of the chapter.