European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences
2007; 11: 383-399
Oxidative stress tests: overview on
reliability and use
Part II
B. PALMIERI, V. SBLENDORIO
Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Medical School, Surgical Clinic, Modena, Italy
Abstract. – Although the healthcare field
is increasingly aware of the importance of free
radicals and oxidative stress, screening and
monitoring has yet become a routine test since,
dangerously, there are no symptoms of this condition. Therefore, in very few cases is oxidative
stress addressed. Paradoxically, patients are often advised supplementation with antioxidants
and or diets with increased antioxidant profile,
which range from vitamins to minerals which is
action against oxidative stress states and even
more so no test is advised to assess whether
the patient is under attack by free radicals or
has a depleted antioxidant capacity.
Hence oxidative stress is an imbalance between free radicals (ROS, Reactive Oxygen
Species) production and existing antioxidant capacity (AC), living organisms have a complex
anti-oxidant power. A decrease in ROS formation is often due to an increase in antioxidant
capacity whilst an increase in the AC may be associated to decreased ROS values. But this is
not always apparently so.
Test kits for photometric determinations applicable to small laboratories are increasingly
available.
Key Words:
Oxidative stress, Free radicals, Antioxidants, Reactive oxygen species.
Introduction
Oxidation is a process that occurs naturally in
the body when oxygen combines with reduced
molecules, such as carbohydrates or fats, and
provides energy. When there is decreased oxidation or decreased energy production, the cells can
no longer function efficiently and disease results.
However, this normal process propagates short-
lived intermediates known as free radicals, and
some free radicals escape and initiate further oxidation setting up a chain reaction. So, potentially
harmful reactive oxygen species are produced as
a consequence of biological metabolism, and by
exposure to environmental factors. Free radicals
are then usually removed or inactivated by a
team of natural antioxidants which prevent these
reactive species from causing excessive cellular
damage.
“Oxidative stress” is the general phenomenon
of oxidant exposure and antioxidant depletion, or
oxidant-antioxidant balance.
Although Reactive Oxygen/Nitrogen Species
(ROS/RNS) play an important role in immunemediated defence against invading microorganisms and serve as cell-signalling molecules, at
high concentrations, ROS/RNS are capable of
damaging host tissues, i.e., they can modify or
damage DNA, lipids, and proteins. As yet mentioned, ROS/RNS levels are controlled through
an intricate network of endogenous and exogenous antioxidant molecules that are responsible
for scavenging and consumption of specific reactive species. In this regard, intake of dietary antioxidants has received much attention, with the
concept being that these molecules can affect disease by modulating the biological reactivity of
free radicals.
Over the past four decades, a substantial body
of data has accumulated to support the direct or
indirect association between free radicals and
various human diseases. Given the number of patients world-wide suffering from these disorders,
and the association with free radicals, screening
of oxidative stress (OS) and consequently
lifestyle and dietary changes are fundamental for
a preventive approach. The role of OS in ageing,
neurodegenerative, vascular and other diseases is
more and more widely accepted, the value of an-
Corresponding Author: Beniamino Palmieri, MD; e-mail:
[email protected]
383
B. Palmieri, V. Sblendorio
tioxidant strategies may sometimes be controversial although a well-balanced antioxidant diet is
undoubtedly important and strongly supported.
Market Available Point of Care Tests
In the last years, several laboratory tests have
been investigated and produced to assess the
whole antioxidant activity of plasma or serum
blood1-5.
Point-of-care diagnostic testing, or testing performed at the patient bedside, allows physicians
to diagnose patients more rapidly than traditional
laboratory-based testing. Rapid results can enable better patient management decisions, improved patient outcomes, and a reduction in the
overall cost of care. These tests are utilized in
hospitals, clinics, commercial laboratories and
research institutions for the purpose of diagnosis
and monitoring of disease.
Although clinicians may associate point-ofcare testing (POCT) with critical care, the reality
is that POCT (bedside, decentralized, or near-patient testing) is already being performed in virtually every clinical setting.
POCT began more than 30 years ago, although
the phrase came into use within the past 15 years.
The driving force behind this type of testing has
always been to improve patient care through
rapid availability of reliable results. The ability to
obtain clinical laboratory test results at the site of
care in 2 minutes has immediate medical management benefits as well as resource and time
benefits.
The potential benefits of POCT include earlier
and more appropriate diagnosis, fewer tests, earlier treatment, and reduction or elimination of unnecessary treatment. An unquantifiable benefit of
POCT also offers convenience and decreases the
time spent in a department or clinic, which are
advantages for providers and patients alike.
By an analytical point of view, the effectiveness of antioxidant plasma barrier can be evaluated by testing its capacity to reduce a specific substrate, i.e. by assessing its capacity to supply oxidized background (e.g. free radicals) with one or
more electrons.
For this purpose, different chemical reducingoxidizing couples are available. For example,
transition metals (i.e. iron) exhibit the property of
receive one electron thus shifting from the oxidized state (Fe3+) to reduced state (Fe2+). Such
384
compounds are the reference to assess antioxidant power of biological systems. Indeed, the socalled “plasma antioxidant power” is ultimately a
measure of the reducing or “electron-giving” activity of blood plasma.
On the other hand, some molecules share the
property to change their absorbance just when
bound to compounds able to switch from the oxidized to reduced state. For example, some thiocyanates are able to reversibly shift from uncolored to colored derivatives, in the presence of
ferric or ferrous salts, respectively4. Such “chromogens” can work as excellent “detectors” when
coupled with adequate “oxidizing/reducing meters” in test designed to assess antioxidant activity of biological systems.
Indeed, when a ferric salt is dissolved in a uncolored solution containing a particular thiocyanate derivative, the resulting solution becomes red, as a function of the ferric ions concentration. This process is due to the formation
of a complex between ferric salt and thiocyanate.
Further adding of a small amount of blood plasma will reduce ferric ions to ferrous ions thus
making uncolored the initial red solution. Such a
chromatic change, may due to the release of ferrous ions by the colored thiocyanate complex,
can be read by means of a photometer, previously set on the wavelength of chromogen.
Therefore, the entity of absorbance change
will directly correlate with the antioxidant “potential” of blood plasma against the specific substrate which has been used as oxidant/detector
(ferric ions). In other words, the capacity of tested plasma to reduce ferric to ferrous ions will
provide a direct measure of the capacity of a
sample of a such plasma to give reducing equivalents and then neutralize chemical species lacking of electrons, like ROS, obviously in the reduction-oxidation potential range of chosen oxidant-reducing couple (Fe3+/Fe2+).
Generally, researchers in the free radicals field
assert that each assay has it’s own specific characteristics and therefore advantages and disadvantages. There are differences in the free radical-generating system, molecular target, reaction
type, biological matrix, residence in the lipo- or
hydrophilic compartments and physiological relevance. It is, therefore, impossible to identify one
assay as a gold standard for measuring total antioxidant status in body fluids.
A combination of a biomarkers of OS, i.e. indexes of oxidative damage and the antioxidant
profile,provides a global assessment of the oxi-
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Monitoring antioxidant therapies;
Testing pharmacological treatments;
Monitoring lifestyle changes;
Sports sector (e.g., during various phases of
training or before and after a performance);
Preventive medicine;
Anti-ageing fields;
Disease management in several fields;
Clinical research.
The FORT Test
Principle and Standardization of Method
FORT (Free Oxygen Radicals Testing) is a
colorimetric test based on the properties of an
amine derivative employed as chromogen,
ChNH 2 (4-Amino-N-ethyl-N-isopropylaniline
hydrochloride) to produce a fairly long-lived radical cation6. When sample is added to a ChNH2
solution, the coloured radical cation of the chromogen is formed and the absorbance at 505 nm,
which is proportional to the concentration of hydroperoxyl molecules, is associated to the oxidative status of the sample.
The visible spectrum of the ChNH2 radical
cation, reported in Figure 1, shows two peaks of
Wavelength (nm)
Figure 1. Visible spectrum of the FORT chromogen radical cation
absorbance at the 505 and 550 nm. The overall
spectral intensity increased with time.
As shown in Figure 2, the increase in absorbance in the first 7-10 minutes is fairly linear,
then reaches a plateau after a time interval which
depends on temperature (the reaction is completed in approximately 60 minutes at 37°C).
Hence, a kinetic analysis of the colourimetric
reaction at 37°C was selected.
The ChNH2 solution is also EPR active, and under high magnetic field modulation (m.a. = 1 mT) it
exhibited a single broad line (Figures 3A and 3B).
Hydroperoxides (ROOH) are fairly stable molecules under physiological conditions, but their
decomposition is catalyzed by transition metals.
Both Fe2+ and Fe3+ are effective catalysts in the
reaction of degradation of these compounds resulting in several secondary reactive radical
species formation7. In biological samples, hydroperoxides concentration represents a good index of free radical attack because it is indicative
of intermediate oxidative products of lipids, peptides and amino acids.
Absorbance
dant/antioxidant balance of the organism as well
as on the nutritional needs of patients and on the
possible antioxidant strategies.
In the following paragraphs, the main Professional Point of Care assays actually available on
the International market will be discussed. The
FORD(patent pending) and FORT as well as BAP and
dROMs are assays that brings laboratory testing
to the near patient testing fields. Test kits have
been developed to provide operators with highly
reliable, rapid and user-friendly methods for the
global evaluation of the oxidative status (radicalinduced damage index and the total antioxidant
capacity) in the body from a single drop of a capillary blood. In particular both FORT and FORD
test are completely stored at room temperature
and work employing lyophilized chromogens to
reduce operator handling and contact with chemical compounds.
Oxidative stress testing is of fundamental importance for preventive medicine and health care,
disease managment as well as the control of relevant therapies during pathologies, in a wide
range of fields and applications. Some examples
are:
Absorbance
Oxidative stress tests: overview on reliability and use. Part II
Time (minute)
Figure 2. Time course of the FORT chromogen radical
cation formation at 37°C.
385
B. Palmieri, V. Sblendorio
A
B
Figure 3. The EPR spectrum of the FORT chromogen radical cation formed in a buffer solution in presence of ferrous ions
and TBH at 0.05 mT of modulation amplitude (A) or human plasma (B) at 1 mT of modulation amplitude.
The reactions occurring in the FORT test conditions are based on the capacity of transition
metals to catalyse the breakdown of ROOH into
derivative radicals, according to Fenton’s reaction. Once they are formed, ROOH mantain their
chemical reactivity and oxidative capacity to produce proportional amounts of alkoxy (RO.) and
peroxy (ROO.) radicals .
These derivative radicals are then preferentially trapped by a suitably buffered FORT chromogen and develop, in a linear kinetic based reaction at 37°C, a coloured fairly long-lived radical cation photometrically detectable. The intensity of the colour correlates directly with the
quantity of radical compounds, according to the
Lambert-Beer’s law and it can be related to the
oxidative status of the sample.
R-OOH + Fe2+ → R-O• +OH- + Fe3+
R-OOH + Fe3+ → R-OO• + H+ + Fe2+
•
RO + ROO• + 2CrNH2 → RO– + ROO– + [Cr-NH2+•]
Definition of Unit of Measure for
the FORT test
Considering the chemical heterogeneity of the
secondary radical species deriving from the irondependent breakdown of ROOH during the
FORT test, it has been decided to relate the absorbance readings to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)
concentration. A reference curve was created and
stored into the dedicated instrument (FORMPlus,
FORmox and photometers CR3000, Callegari
Spa, Catellani Group, Parma, Italy) which performs automatically the calculation of equivalent
concentrations of H2O2.
386
In order to define a dedicated unit of measure
for the FORT test, conventional units called
FORT units have been defined. One FORT unit
corresponds to approximately 7.6 mmol/l of
H2O2 (equivalent to 0.26 mg/l). Transformations
are automatically performed by the dedicated instruments so that the results are expressed both
as concentration of H2O2 equivalent and as FORT
units. So doing the value interpretation results
easier for any operators including lay users.
Method Performances
Linearity: The linearity of the FORT test system was tested using two different methods (LOF
test and Mandel test). With both of them the linearity resulted statistically verified. Range of linearity: 148-608 FORT units.
Precision: intra-assay coefficient of variation,
CV < 5%.
Repeatability: intra-assay coefficient of variation, CV < 5%.
Sensitivity: it is determined by the linearity
range of the FORT reaction, that is 160-600 FORT
units. S = 4.0528, the sensitivity (S) is defined as: S
= ∆Abs/∆C; Abs = absorbance, C = concentration.
Accuracy: BIAS of the FORT test was determined analyzing a series of H2O2 solution in water. Ten replicates were performed for each level
of concentration (C).
Predicted BIAS was calculated as: [(C expected-C obtained)/C obtained] × 100.
BIAS < 4% for 1.43 mM H2O2 ≤ C ≤ 4.23 mM
H2O2;
BIAS < 7% for C = 1.214 mM H2O2;
BIAS < 12% for C ≥ 4.74 mM H2O2.
Oxidative stress tests: overview on reliability and use. Part II
Sample: 20 µl of whole blood; 10 µl for serum
or plasma.
Normal values: up to 310 FORT units (corresponding to approximately 2.36 mmol/l of
H2O2)8.
The higher the FORT result obtained, the
higher is the oxidative status of the sample. Although the assay is very reproducible for the
same subject during the day and the CVs, both
inter- and intra-assay, are very low, the value of
the FORT measured on healthy subjects may be
variable. Since the oxidative stress state of an individual depends on the hereditary, dietary and
environmental factors, there is a large heterogeneity in the population that may be related to
disease incidence and longevity. For this reason,
it is advisable to establish reference value for a
patient.
Interference Factors
The FORT test is based on Fenton’s reaction.
Fenton chemistry was discovered about 100
years ago and it has proven to be a cornerstone of
free radical biochemistry9,10. Fenton’s reagent is a
mixture of H2O2 and ferrous iron, which produces secondary radicals11,12, according to the reactions:
Fe2+ + H2O2 → Fe3+ + OH• + OH–
RH + OH• → H2O + R• → further oxidation
R• + O2 → ROO•
The ferrous iron (Fe2+) initiates and catalyses
the decomposition of H2O2, resulting in the production of hydroxyl radicals (OH.). Hydroxyl
radicals can oxidise organics (RH) by abstraction
of protons producing organic radicals (R.), which
are highly reactive and can be further oxidised,
initiating a radical chain oxidation. During the
FORT reaction, overall organic radicals present
in the sample are trapped by the FORT chromogen and photometrically measured.
The reactions above suggest that the presence
of iron is required in the test reaction, and thereby use of any kind of iron-chelating agents (e.g.,
EDTA, citrate, desferal), external hydroperoxide
and/or antioxidant sources (e.g., H2O2, benzoyl
peroxide, BHT, ascorbic acid) affect the FORT
assay blocking the Fenton’s chemistry. In fact,
solutions of the FORT chromogen and organics
lacking the iron showed no specific EPR signal.
Therefore, the FORT test cannot be applied when
iron chelating substances are present.
The hydrogen peroxide reacts in the Fenton’s
reaction, so external sources of H2O2, such as
some disinfectants, can potentially interfere with
the test resulting in not reliable FORT values.
Analogously, the presence in the sample of molecules such as BHT (3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxytoluene) having antioxidant action interfere with
the correct scheme for the test reaction in accordance with the Fenton’s chemistry.
When the test is performed on whole blood,
abnormal haematocrit values and haemolysed
samples may affect the results. Nevertheless,
there is no significant interference when hematocrit is between 38% and 48%.
The FORD test
Principle and Standardization of Method
FORD (Free Oxygen Radicals Defence) is a
colorimetric test based on the ability of antioxidants present in plasma to reduce a preformed
radical cation. The principle of the assay is that
at an acidic pH (5.2) and in the presence of a
suitable oxidant solution (FeCl3), 4-Amino-N,Ndiethylaniline, the FORD chromogen, can form a
stable and colored radical cation.
Antioxidant molecules (AOH) present in the
sample which are able to transfer a hydrogen
atom to the FORD chromogen radical cation, reduce it quenching the color and producing a decoloration of the solution which is proportional
to their concentration in the sample.
Preliminary experiments showed that the
choice of oxidant solution and the ratio between
the concentration of the chromogen substance
and the concentration of the oxidative compound
are essential for the effectiveness of the method.
Chromogen(uncolored) + oxidant (Fe3+) H+ → Chromogen.+(purple)
Chromogen.+(purple) + AOH → Chromogen+(uncolored) + AO
The UV-visible spectrum of the FORD chromogen radical cation (Figure 4) shows maximum
of absorbance at approximately 330 nm, 510 nm
and 550 nm. Hence, an end-point analysis of the
colorimetric reaction at 505 nm and at 37°C was
selected.
The time course of the FORD chromogen radical formation obtained with an oxidant solution
of FeCl3 which gives a stable colored solution is
reported in the Figure 5. It is outlined that to
387
Abs
Absorbance
B. Palmieri, V. Sblendorio
Albumin
Vitamin C
TRolox
GSH
Nm
Antioxidant/µM
Figure 4. UV-visible spectrum of the FORD chromogen
radical cation.
Abs
have both high sensitivity of the measurements
and a sufficient inhibition range, a starting point
between 0.80 and 1.00 of absorbance at 505 nm
is necessary. This absorbance readings are typically reached after 3-4 minute, after that the optical density remains stable. Hence, a lag-time of 4
minutes was adopted between starting the reaction and measure of the chromogen radical cation
absorbance reading.
The system was tested by using different concentrations of several antioxidant compounds,
namely ascorbic acid, albumin, glutathione
(GSH), uric acid and Trolox, the α-tocopherol
analogue with enhanced water solubility. The
dose-response curves obtained (Figure 6) showed
that inhibition of the starting absorbance is linear.
Moreover, results revealed a relevant participation of FORD from ascorbic acid, Trolox, albumin and GSH, and no response from uric acid.
Antioxidants tested have comparable kinetics
in FORD chromogen radical scavenging, and the
Time/minutes
Figure 5. Time-course of the FORD chromogen radical
formation at 37°C and 505 nm.
388
Figure 6. Degree of inhibition of the FORD chromogen
absorbance as a function of antioxidant concentration.
absorbance inhibition induced is immediate.
Hence, a lag-time of 2 minutes was selected between addition of sample containing antioxidants
and measure of the color inhibition.
This provides an assay based on the extent of
radical cation reduction at a fixed time point and
not on the rate of reduction. This feature rules
out complications due to the monitoring of the
time course of colour inhibitions.
FORD color quenching is determined especially by contribution of antioxidants like proteins, reduced glutathione, vitamins etc. These
antioxidants (together with uric acid which is not
detected by the FORD test but is measured by a
different test) are among the most important contributors to antioxidant plasmatic barrier.
Unit of Measure
Like many other methods4,13, FORD results are
express like Trolox equivalents (mmol/l) using a
calibration curve plotted with different amounts
of standard Trolox that is stored on the dedicated
instrument (FORM Plus, FORM ox and CR3000
series diagnostic analyzers, Callegari SpA, Catellani Group, Parma, Italy). An example of doseresponse curve obtained by using Trolox is
shown in Figure 7. Each data is the mean of four
determinations performed in four different days.
The standard deviation is very low and the curve
is highly reproducible (Coefficient of Variation,
CV < 5%).
Reference Values
Based on a preliminary number of 70 human
blood donors (male/female ratio, 37/33; aged 2070 years, mean age 36 years) and the values cited
in scientific literature14, at present the reference
Oxidative stress tests: overview on reliability and use. Part II
Absorbance at 505 nm
Interferences
Use of any kind of iron-chelating agents (e.g.,
EDTA, citrate, desferal); external hydroperoxide
and/or antioxidant sources (e.g., H2O2, benzoyl
peroxide, BHT, BHA, ascorbic acid); abnormal
haematocrit values and haemolysed samples
(when the test is performed on whole blood).
Sample: 50 µl of whole blood.
Trolox mmol/L
Figure 7. Degree of inhibition of the FORD chromogen
absorbance as a function of the Trolox concentration.
values of FORD were estimated to be within the
1.07-1.5 mmol/l Trolox range (mean value = 1.23
mmol/l Trolox) which includes approximately
85% of data.
Method Performances
Linearity
The linearity of the FORD test system was
tested using solutions of Trolox as a chemical antioxidant standard. Tests were performed over a
wide range of concentrations by subsequent dilutions of a stock solution and measuring the correspondent increment in FORD. The linearity has
been statistically verified applying the Mendel’s
test.
Range of linearity: 0.25-3.0 mmol/l Trolox.
Repeatability and Precision
Three different concentrations of Trolox (2.5,
1.25 and 0.25 mM) were assayed 10 times in the
same run for the determination of intra-assay coefficient variation (CV). An intra-assay CV< 5%
was demonstrated. Additionally, repeatability
and precision were established testing whole human capillary blood. The FORD test was carried
out using two different instruments and one level
of concentration that is 1.25 mM Trolox equivalent. 20 replicates were performed for each instruments during the same day.
Repeatability (N = 20): CV < 5%;
Precision (N = 40): CV< 5%.
Clinical Applications
Cancer-related anorexia/cachexia syndrome
and oxidative stress play a key role in the progression and outcome of neoplastic disease.
Mantovani et al15 have developed an innovative
approach consisting of diet with high polyphenol
content (400 mg), p.o. pharmaconutritional support enriched with n-3 fatty acids (eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid) 2 cans
(237 mL each) per day, medroxyprogesterone acetate 500 mg/d, antioxidant treatment with alphalipoic acid 300 mg/d plus carbocysteine lysine
salt 2.7 g/d plus vitamin E 400 mg/d plus vitamin
A 30,000 IU/d plus vitamin C 500 mg/d, and selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor Celecoxib 200
mg/d. The treatment is administered for 16 weeks.
The following variables are evaluated: (a) clinical
variables (stage and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status); (b) nutritional variables (lean body mass, appetite, and resting energy
expenditure); (c) laboratory variables (serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines, C-reactive protein, and leptin and blood levels of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant enzymes); and (d)
quality of life variables (European Organization
for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30,
EQ-5Dindex, and EQ-5DVAS). A phase II nonrandomized study has been designed to enroll 40
patients with advanced cancer at different sites
with symptoms of cancer-related anorexia/
cachexia syndrome and oxidative stress. As of
January 2004, 28 patients have been enrolled: 25
patients were evaluable and 14 of them have
completed the treatment (20 patients have completed 2 months of treatment). As for clinical response, five patients improved, three patients remained unchanged, and six patients worsened.
The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (grade) 1 remained unchanged.
As for nutritional/functional variables, the lean
body mass increased significantly at 2 and 4
months. As for laboratory variables, reactive
oxygen species decreased significantly and
proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-6 and tu389
B. Palmieri, V. Sblendorio
mor necrosis factor-alpha decreased significantly.
As for quality of life, it comprehensively improved after treatment. The treatment has been
shown to be effective for clinical response, increase of lean body mass, decrease of reactive
oxygen species and proinflammatory cytokines,
and improvement of quality of life. The treatment has been shown to be safe with good compliance of patients.
Anemia occurs in more than 30% of patients
with epithelial ovarian cancer before any surgery.
High levels of proinflammatory cytokines and increased oxidative stress may contribute to the development of cancer-related anemia. Macciò et
al16 assessed a population of previously untreated
patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
to evaluate whether there was a correlation between hemoglobin (Hb) and parameters of inflammation and oxidative stress, stage of disease,
and performance status (PS). In 91 patients with
epithelial ovarian cancer and 95 healthy women
matched for age, weight, and height, levels of
Hb, C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen (Fbg),
proinflammatory cytokines, leptin, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and antioxidant enzymes
were assessed at diagnosis before treatment. The
correlations between Hb, parameters of inflammation and oxidative stress, stage, and PS were
evaluated. Hb levels were lower in patients with
advanced epithelial ovarian cancer than in control subjects and inversely related to stage and
PS. Hb negatively correlated with CRP, Fbg, interleukin 1beta (IL-1beta), IL-6, tumor necrosis
factor alpha (TNF-alpha), and ROS, and positively correlated with leptin and glutathione peroxidase (GPx). Multivariate regression analysis
showed that stage and IL-6 were independent
factors determining Hb values. This evidence
suggests that anemia in epithelial ovarian cancer
is common and its presence is related to stage of
disease and markers of inflammation.
Increases in the inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP) have been associated with a
higher risk of incident coronary heart disease
(CHD). These epidemiologic data suggest that
identifying the determinants of elevated CRP levels before CHD has become clinically manifest
could provide insights into the earliest stages of
CHD development. The causes of increased CRP,
however, are not completely understood. Reports
have indicated that increased body mass index
(BMI) is strongly related to elevated CRP. Data
also indicated that hypertension and smoking
may increase CRP. These factors do not appear
390
to explain all of the variability in CRP though, so
other factors may contribute. Basic studies have
indicated that oxidative stress may have pro-inflammatory effects. Particularly, reports indicate
that oxidative stress is critical for activation of
nuclear factor kappaB (NF-κB), a transcription
factor that increases expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and cell adhesion
molecules. Consistent with these reports, both
laboratory and animal investigations have shown
that various markers of oxidative stress are indeed related to increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin 6 and interleukin 8), chemokines (monocyte chemotactic
protein-1) and cell-adhesion molecules (vascular
cell adhesion molecule-1, intracellular adhesion
molecule-1). Additionally, researchers recently
observed in vitro evidence of an association between an oxidative stress marker (oxidized lowdensity lipoprotein) and CRP. From all these data, it would be reasonable to hypothesize that oxidative stress might be associated with elevated
levels of CRP in humans. Yet studies of oxidative
stress and CRP in healthy humans have been
somewhat sparse. A few studies have indicated
that oxidative stress markers such as urinary F2
isoprostanes, hydrogen peroxide production from
mononuclear cells, and oxidized-LDL show positive associations with CRP in humans without
CHD, but the precise association between oxidative stress markers and CRP in healthy humans is
not firmly established. Studies suggest that oxidative stress may have pro-inflammatory effects,
but data on the relationship between oxidative
stress and CRP in healthy individuals is insufficient. Abramson et al (17) conducted a cross-sectional study of oxidative stress markers and high
sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) among 126 adults without CHD. These researchers investigated whether
markers of oxidative stress were associated with
CRP in persons without clinical CHD, and
whether these oxidative stress markers predicted
CRP independently of BMI and other CRP determinants. They focused on two markers of oxidative stress which had not previously been investigated in relation to CRP in healthy humans. The
first measure was the free oxygen radical test assay. The FORT provides an indirect measure of
hydroperoxides, which are an useful measure of
oxidative stress because they indicate the intermediate oxidative products of lipids, amino acids
and peptides. The second measure was the plasma ratio of reduced to oxidized glutathione,
known as the GSH/GSSG couple. The steady
Oxidative stress tests: overview on reliability and use. Part II
state balance between the GSH/GSSG couple can
be expressed as a redox potential (E h )
GSH/GSSG, and this redox potential is considered a dynamic and quantitative measure of oxidative stress18. In this study of adults without
clinical CHD, they found a positive association
between oxidative stress, as measured by the
FORT and CRP. In unadjusted analyses, these researchers found that the FORT explained a statistically significant 29% of the variance in
ln(hsCRP). In a linear regression model that adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and other
potential hsCRP determinants, the FORT was
positively related to log-transformed hsCRP and
explained 14% of free of CHD, oxidative stress,
as measured by the FORT, is significantly associated with higher hsCRP levels, independent of
BMI and other CRP determinants. They also
found a positive association between (E h )
GSH/GSSG and ln(hsCRP) which was not statistically significant. This results suggest that oxidative stress may be a determinant of CRP levels
and promote pro-atherosclerotic inflammatory
processes at the earliest stages of CHD development. These finding of an association between
the FORT and CRP extends the basic findings
noted above and lends credibility to the notion
that oxidative stress may be related to inflammation in healthy humans. This suggests that oxidative stress could potentially be a key factor in the
early stages of CHD. Of particular note in this
study was the finding that the FORT rivalled
BMI as a predictor of CRP, and that the FORT
explained a substantial amount of CRP variability independent of BMI. Prior investigations have
reported that increasing BMI level are strongly
predictive of elevated CRP. This study suggests
that oxidative stress may also be a relevant determinant of CRP levels in healthy persons, independent of BMI, and that therefore, the link between oxidative stress and CRP may involve
mechanisms that are not necessarily related to
BMI. It is of interest that even if they found a
correlation between hsCRP and the FORT, (Eh)
GSH/GSSG correlated poorly with hsCRP. At
first glance the differences between these two
markers of oxidative stress seem puzzling. However, it should be stressed that they may reflect
very different oxidative processes. Increases in
FORT values most likely indicate increases in
oxidation of lipids, which occurs in lipid bilayers and in lipid particles. In contrast, (E h )
GSH/GSSG may represent oxidation in thiols
that are most likely to occurr in hydrophilic com-
partments such as the cell cytoplasm. As such,
these findings suggest the importance of recognizing that different oxidative markers may be
representative of different cellular oxidation
events.
Fatigue is a multidimensional symptom that is
described in terms of perceived energy, mental
capacity, and psychological status: it can impair
daily functioning and lead to negative effects on
quality of life. It is one of the most common side
effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. L-carnitine (LC) supplementation has been demonstrated to be able to improve fatigue symptoms in
patients with cancer. Gramignano et al19 tested
the efficacy and safety of LC supplementation in
a population of patients who had advanced cancer and developed fatigue, high blood levels of
reactive oxygen species, or both. These researchers evaluated fatigue and quality of life in
relation to oxidative stress, nutritional status, and
laboratory variables, mainly levels of reactive
oxygen species, glutathione peroxidase, and
proinflammatory cytokines. From March to July
2004, 12 patients who had advanced tumors
(50% at stage IV) at different sites were enrolled
(male-to-female ratio 2:10, mean age 60 y, range
42-73). Patients were only slightly anemic (hemoglobin 10.9 g/dL) and hemoglobin levels did
not change after treatment. LC was administered
orally at 6 g/d for 4 wk. All patients underwent
antineoplastic treatment during LC supplementation. Fatigue, as measured by the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form,
decreased significantly, particularly for the General and Physical scales, and for quality of life in
each subscale of quality of life in relation to oxidative stress. Nutritional variables (lean body
mass and appetite) increased significantly after
LC supplementation. Levels of reactive oxygen
species decreased and glutathione peroxidase increased but not significantly. Proinflammatory
cytokines did not change significantly. Improvement of symptoms with respect to fatigue and
quality of life in relation to oxidative stress may
be explained mainly by an increase in lean body
mass, which may be considered the most important nutritional or functional parameter in assessing the cachectic state of patients. In this view,
fatigue with related symptoms can well be considered an important constituent of cancer-related
anorexia cachexia syndrome.
Mantovani et al20 conducted an open earlyphase II study, according to the Simon twostage design, to evaluate the efficacy and safety
391
B. Palmieri, V. Sblendorio
of an integrated treatment based on a pharmaconutritional support, antioxidants, and drugs,
all given orally, in a population of advanced
cancer patients with cancer-related anorexia/
cachexia and oxidative stress. The integrated
treatment consisted of diet with high polyphenols content (400 mg), antioxidant treatment
(300 mg/d alpha-lipoic acid + 2.7 g/d carbocysteine lysine salt + 400 mg/d vitamin E + 30,000
IU/d vitamin A + 500 mg/d vitamin C), and
pharmaconutritional support enriched with 2
cans per day (n-3)-PUFA (eicosapentaenoic
acid and docosahexaenoic acid), 500 mg/d
medroxyprogesterone acetate, and 200 mg/d selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib.
The treatment duration was 4 months. The following variables were evaluated: (a) clinical
(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status); (b) nutritional [lean body mass
(LBM), appetite, and resting energy expenditure]; (c) laboratory [proinflammatory cytokines and leptin, reactive oxygen species
(ROS) and antioxidant enzymes]; (d) quality of
life (European Organization for Research and
Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30, Euro QL-5D,
and MFSI-SF). From July 2002 to January
2005, 44 patients were enrolled. Of these, 39
completed the treatment and were assessable.
Body weight increased significantly from baseline as did LBM and appetite. There was an important decrease of proinflammatory cytokines
interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factoralpha, and a negative relationship worthy of
note was only found between LBM and IL-6
changes. As for quality of life evaluation, there
was a marked improvement in the European
Organization for Research and Treatment of
Cancer QLQ-C30, Euro QL-5D(VAS), and
multidimensional fatigue symptom inventoryshort form scores. At the end of the study, 22 of
the 39 patients were “responders” or “high responders”. The minimum required was 21;
therefore, the treatment was effective and more
importantly was shown to be safe.
acidic buffer) are able to produce alkoxyl (RO.)
and peroxyl (ROO.) radicals, according to the
Fenton’s reaction. Such radicals, in turn, are
able to oxidize an alkyl-substituted aromatic
ammine (A-NH 2 , that is dissolved in chromogenic mixture) thus transforming them in a
pink-colored derivative ([A-NH2.]+), accordingly to the reactions (the first two for alkoxyl
radicals and the others two for peroxyl radicals):
ROOH + Fe2+ → RO· + Fe3++ OHRO· + A-NH2 → RO- + [A-NH2·]+
ROOH + Fe3+ → ROO· + Fe2+ + H+
ROO· + A-NH2 → ROO· + [A-NH2·]+
Finally, this colored-derivative is photometrically quantified. Indeed, the intensity of developed color is directly proportional to the level
of ROMs, according to the Lambert-Beer’s law.
The d-ROMs test is based on spectrophotometer studies on increases in red colour intensity after the addition of a small quantity of human
blood to a solution of N,N-diethylparaphenylendiamine (chromogen), buffered to pH 4.8. Such
colouring is attributed to the formation, via oxidation, of the cation radical of the amine which
formationis due to alkoxyl and peroxyl radicals.
These latter derive from the reaction of the Fe2+
and Fe3+ ions released by proteins in acidic conditions as created in vitro.
After the experimental validation by means of
the ESR, analytical performances of d-ROMs test
either manually or automatically was evalauted
by the biochemical and clinical viewpoints by
means of spectrophotometry.
The effect of temperature on velocity of reaction (assessed as mAbs/min) in the most frequently utilized range (1-4 min) was evident so
that a thermostating system (with optimum at
37°C) is required during kinetic measurements.
Definition of Unit of Measure for
the d-ROMs Test
d-ROMs test
Principle and Standardization
In the d-ROMs test, ROMs (Reactive Oxygen Metabolites, mainly hydroperoxides,
ROOH) of a blood sample, in presence of iron
(that is released from plasma proteins by an
392
The results of d-ROMs test will be expressed
as Carratelli Units (CARR U), according to the
following formula:
CARR U = F × (δ Abs/min)
where:
Oxidative stress tests: overview on reliability and use. Part II
• F is a correction factor with an assigned valueapproximately 9000 at 37°C (according to the
results obtained with the standard).
• (δ Abs/min) are the mean differences of the
absorbances recorded at 1, 2 and 3 min.
The results of d-ROMs test are expressed as
CARR U because of the heterogeneity of hydroperoxides which are specifically detected with
this technique. Such unities can be obtained by
multiply absorbance changes, as photometrically
detected, for a known correction factor, i.e. the F
factor which values are between 9.000 and
10.000 (according to the prescriptions of manufacturer, as assessed by means of a specific control serum). In any case, in order to have an absolute reference, it has been experimentally established that 1 CARR U corresponds to 0.08 mg
of H2O2/dL.
Method Performances
Analytical parameters which was considered
on human blood samples were the kinetic of reaction, the effect of temperature on reaction velocity, the linearity of reaction, the sensitivity of
technique and its analytical imprecision, the stability of sample over the time at various temperatures and the analytical interferences.
The kinetic of reaction, the effect of temperature on velocity of reaction and the linearity
between signal and concentration were manually assessed by carrying out d-ROMs on two
different spectrophotometers21. In such conditions, by monitoring over the time the increase
of absorbance at 505 nm, the reaction of dROMs test was shown to be linear at 37°C in
the most frequently utilized measurement
range (1-4 min).
The linearity between signal and concentration
(assessed as mAbs/min) in the most frequently
utilized measurement range (1-4 min) as assessed
by increasing volume of sample or by its dilution
was shown to be excellent.
Overlapping results were done by performing d-ROMs test with other and different
equipments, either diluting samples, according
to the manual procedure or increasing the volume of samples, according to the automatic
procedure. The linearity range of d-ROMs test
as assessed by automatic technique was between 50 and 500 CARR U. Therefore, for values up to 500 CARR U the dilution of sample
is required22.
The first study, in which d-ROMs test was performed according to the kinetic procedure provided encouraging results with a within run imprecision, as CV, of 2.1% (n = 20, fresh sera) and
a between run imprecision of 3.1% (n = 20,
frozen sera). Substantially overlapping results
were found, in the same analytical conditions, by
performing d-ROMs test with a different analytical instrument. Taken together these findings
clearly indicate that d-ROMs test can be performed either manually or automatically, with
acceptably low analytical imprecision. Heparin,
was shown to be not able to influence results of
d-ROMs test.
The results of d-ROMs test, when analysis is
carried out repeatedly in the same subjects and in
the same day they do not differ substantially, unless a factor able to induce a sudden increase of
ROMs generation (e.g. a muscular effort) intervenes23.
Normal values. In a population of healthy
subjects was shown that blood ROMs levels
(mainly hydroperoxides) as measured by dROMs test have an unimodal distribution that
peaks between 250 and 300 CARR U (i.e. between 20 and 24 mg/dL H2O2).
Clinical Applications
Newborns, independently of the gender, was
found to have significantly lower levels of
ROMs than these of adults 24-26 whereas pregnancy was shown to be related to higher values
of d-ROMs test compared to those of non-pregnant women.
The d-ROMs test was proven to be useful also
in patients suffering from oxidative stress-related
diseases. In the field of neuropsychiatry, a placebo-controlled trial demonstrated that chelant
therapy with D-penicillamine is able to reduce
serum levels of d-ROMs in Alzheimer’s
disease27. Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis was shown to have higher d-ROMs test values compared to healthy controls28.
The d-ROMs test has been performed also to
assess oxidative stress which can be related to
kidney diseases, especially in chronic renal failure and in its treatment, i.e. dialysis and kidney
transplantation29-32 and it has been proven that
kidney-transplanted individuals are at high risk
for oxidative stress.
d-ROMs test was proven useful in the assessing of oxidative stress in Down’s syndrome33.
393
B. Palmieri, V. Sblendorio
d-ROMs test
Principle
Chromogenic substrate
Chromogen state
Steps involved
Classification of toxicity: Harmful
Chromogen storage
Modalities of execution
Precision in manual use
Validation by ESR
Certification IVD
Patents
Results expression
Both are colorimetric tests based on
the Fenton reaction. The principle
of photometry and chemistry of
transition metals is well known to
the scientific community and well
documented in scientific literature.
Both are derivatives of phenilendiamine
Liquid
5
Yes
4-8°C
Laboratory-Not IVD certification
Poor (Iamele et al., Clin Chem Lab
Med 2002; 40: 673-676, 34) plus
clinical report from Freiburg Hospital
for Tumorbiology (Dossett A, Arends J,
Hydroperoxide im venösen Blut:
Vergleich von zwei photometrischen
Ansätzen., 35)
Documented
No
Callegari S.p.A. has taken court action
against manufacturers to cancel the
d-ROMs patent worldwide
Arbitrary unit, referred to as Carr. U.
FORT test
Lyophilized
5
No
At room temperature (15-30°C)
Point of care- Full IVD certification
and CE compliance
Good (Dal Negro et al., It J Chest
Diseases 2003; 57: 199-209) plus
clinical report from Freiburg Hospital
for Tumorbiology. (Dossett A, Arends
J, Hydroperoxide im venösen Blut:
Vergleich von zwei photometrischen
Ansätzen., 35)
Documented
Yes, CE0344
Patent pending
Analytical performances
Coefficient of variation (CV)
not documented
Assessment of the normal range
Not documented/unavailable
Values in newborns
Documented
Clinical usefulness
Comparison with other test
Documented
Documented
Manufacturer of the
complete system
Guidelines
Years of experience in
clinical routine
At least 20 citations on PUBMED
Appreciations/State
Reimbursement
No
mmol/l of H2O2, official unit FORT units,
conventional unit, fully documented
Variability = 0,79% ± 3,47sd, well
documented (Normal values a
reproducibility of the major oxidative
stress obtained thanks to FORM system:
Dal Negro et al., It J Chest Diseases
2003; 57: 199-209)
Well documented (Normal values and
reproducibility of the major oxidative
stress obtained thanks to FORM
system. Dal Negro et al., It J Chest
Diseases 2003; 57: 199-209)
Well documented (Parmigiani S et al., J
Perinat Med 2003; 31 (Suppl 1): 264)
Well documented
Well documented by the University of
Modena and Padua (Giovannini et al.,
Biochimica Clinica 2004; 28: 200, 36)
Yes
Available worldwide
More than 10
Available worldwide
Since 1930 (therefore 76 years)
No
International Union of
Angiology/NO
No
Yes. e.g. reference test for cancer wards
authorized by governamental body in
Italy (Cagliari Hospital) and in
Germany the test is reimbursed by
insurance companies
394
Oxidative stress tests: overview on reliability and use. Part II
BAP Test
BAP (Biological Antioxidant Power) test is
based on the capacity of a colored solution, containing a source of ferric (Fe3+) ions adequately
bound to a special chromogenic substrate, to a
decolour when Fe3+ ions are reduced to ferrous
ions (Fe2+), as it occurs by adding a reducing/antioxidant system, i.e. a blood plasma sample.
Therefore, in the BAP test, a small quantity of
blood plasma (10 µl) to be tested is dissolved in a
coloured solution, which has been previously obtained by mixing a source of ferric ions (i.e. ferric chloride, FeCl3) with a special chromogenic
substrate (i.e. a thiocyanate derivative).
After a short incubation (5 min), at 37°C, such
solution will decolor and the intensity of this chromatic change will be directly proportional to the capacity of plasma to reduce, during the incubation,
ferric ions (initially responsible for the color of solution) to ferrous ions, according to these reactions:
FeCl3 + AT(uncolored) → FeCl3 – AT(colored)
FeCl3 – AT(colored) + BP(e-) → FeCl2 + AT(uncolored) + BP
where :
• FeCl3 is ferric chloride;
• AT(uncolored) is a thiocyanate derivative (uncolored);
• FeCl3-AT(colored) is the colored complex of ferric
chloride with the thiocyanatederivative;
• BP(e-) is a molecule of blood plasma barrier
with reducing/electron giving/antioxidant activity against ferric ions;
• BP is the oxidized form of BP(e-);
• FeCl2 is the ferrous chloride obtained by the
reducing activityof BP(e-).
FORD
By photometrically assessing the intensity of
decoloration, the concentrations of reduced ferric ions can be adequately determined thus allowing a measurement of reducing capacity or
antioxidant potential of tested blood plasma.
Such “potential” is obviously not absolute but
relative to the tested substrate, i.e. ferric ions.
Considering that such ions are naturally occurring components of our body, BAP test provides
a measure of antioxidant power of the fraction
of plasma barrier to oxidation which is directly
involved, due to the implicated reducing-oxidant potentials, against the attack of reactive
chemical species in “physiological” or “biological” conditions.
Comparative Studies
BAP test versus FRAP test: According to
Vassalle’s study 37, BAP test provided results
greatly comparable to those of FRAP test,
against which it appears more quick and simple
to perform. Indeeed, the preparation and management of the FRAP reagent is a step somewhat
complex, compared to that of BAP test, so that
manual procedure of FRAP test can increase analytical variability. In fact, acceptable levels of analytical accuracy with FRAP test were observed
with automatic procedures.
Comparison FORD/BAP
Both tests are based on principles widely employed by the scientific community and for commercial applications.
FORD → TEAC principle (Trolox Equivalent
Antioxidant Capacity).
BAP → FRAP principle (Ferric Reducing
Ability of Plasma).
BAP
Chromogen(uncolored) + oxidant (Fe3+) H+ → Chromogen •+ (purple)
FeCl3 + AT(uncoloured) → FeCl3-AT(colored)
Chromogen •+(purple) + AOH → Chromogen ±(uncolored) + AO
FeCl3-AT(colored) + BP(e-) → FeCl2 + AT(uncoloured) + BP
The FORD test uses preformed stable and colored radicals
and measures the decrease in absorbance that is
proportional to the blood antioxidant levels of the sample
according to the Lambert Beer’s law.
The BAP test is based on the capacity of a coloured
solution, containing a source of ferric ions adequately
bound to a special chromogenic substrate, to decolour
when ferric ions are reduced to ferrous ions
In the presence of an acidic buffer and a suitable oxidant
the chromogen forms a stable and colored radical cation
photometrically detectable
The sample is dissolved in a coloured solution, which
has been previously obtained by mixing a ferric ions
solution with the chromogen
Antioxidant molecules in the sample reduce the radical
cation of the chromogen quenching the colour and
producing decoloration of the solution which is
proportional to their levels
After incubation the solution decolours and the intensity
of decoloration is assessed photometrically. The cromatic
change is directly proportional to the capacity of plasma
to reduce ferric ions to ferrous ions
395
B. Palmieri, V. Sblendorio
Further Information on the BAP Assay
The principle is based on the reduction of ferric (Fe3+) to ferrous (Fe2+) ions. Major negative
aspects of this test principle are:
• Some antioxidants are able to reduce ferric
ions to ferrous ions. However not all are able
to do so. This means that some antioxidants
will not be determined by this assay. Furthermore other substances other than antioxidants,
are able to reduce the ferric ions into ferrous
ions. So in summary:
• The primary known contributors to this assay
are uric acid and ascorbic acid, antioxidants
that reduce the ferric to ferrous ions.
• Other antioxidants that cannot reduce the ferric to ferrous ions (such as carotenoids and
SH-group antioxidants) are not being measured by this assay.
• Some reductors, which are not antioxidants,
reduce ferric to ferrous ions. These will cause
falsely high results being obtained as these are
not antioxidants (e.g. glucose, hydroperoxides,
ethanol).
• Since the effects of proteins are weak, the assay practically measures non-protein total antioxidant capacity.
• The major antioxidants contributors of this assay are uric acid and ascorbic acid. However,
while uric acid is a powerful antioxidant, gender and metabolic differences, as well as some
pathological conditions (kidney diseases,
metabolic disorders, diet and strenuous exercise) may be related to an increase of uric acid
in plasma, thus introducing a possible confounding factor in the measurement of plasma
antioxidant capacity. For example, the toxic
effect of chronic ethanol consumption results
in a paradoxical increase in plasma uric acid
concentrations. The same increase in uric acid
amounts can be seen in patients with a renal
dysfunction. Furthermore high uric acid levels,
left undetected, are dangerous to health.
Some More Specific Information on
the FORD Test
The FORD test is based on the capacity of antioxidants to reduce a radical cation of the chromogen. Uric acid is not purposely measured in
this assay but is measured separately to avoid
misinterpretation of results. Furthermore being
determined alone, operators are able to investigate high levels further and diagnose related diseases. The principal antioxidants present in plasma are measured via the FORD test (SH-group
antioxidants, vitamin C, albumin and other plasmatic proteins, reduced glutathione (GSH) and
bilirubin. These antioxidants (together with uric
acid which is measured separately by the FORMPlus instrument) are amongst the most relevant
contributors to the antioxidant plasmatic barrier.
BAP performances (precision, repeatibility,
linearity, etc) are not provided. The accuracy only is stated. The accuracy of an analytical method
describes the degree of closeness of mean test results obtained by the method to the nominal
(standard) or known true value. By definition, accuracy is the degree of conformity with the true
values or a standard and it relates to the quality
of a result. Consequently, it is insufficient to provide a range of concentrations to express the accuracy: a percentage value or BIAS (that is, the
error which arises when estimating quantity) is
required.
The expression of the BAP results is µmol/l of
antioxidants such as vitamin C. The manufacturers do not specify which antioxidant is used for
the expression but make a general statement on
the expression. The reference range of plasma
TAC (Total Antioxidant Capacity) changes from
method to method because there is specified tar-
FORD
Procedure type
Whole blood volume
Centrifugation time
Reading time
Repeatability
Precision
Linearity range
Accuracy
Reference values
396
Both automatic and manual
50 µl
60 sec
4 + 2 min
CV < 5%
CV < 8.5%
0.25-3 mmol/l Trolox
BIAS < 15% in the overall linearity range
1.07-1.53 mmol/l Trolox
BAP
Only manual
At least 100 µl
90 sec
5 sec + 5 min
N/A
N/A
N/A
1500-3000 µM
> 2200 µM (corresponding to 2.2 mmol/l)
Oxidative stress tests: overview on reliability and use. Part II
get molecule or assay standard in literature. In
some studies, Trolox, uric acid, vitamin C and
ferrous ion solutions have been used for the calibration of the assay. For this reason it is important to specify the type of standard employed.
However, Trolox is the most widely used traditional standard and hence Trolox was employed
as the assay standard in the FORD method.
Furthermore the BAP normal values are significantly higher than values commonly reported
for the most of TAC methods including the
FRAP (plasma FRAP values of healthy adults reported in scientific literature are approximately
1000 µM). The FORD reference ranges are similar to the values cited in specific literature.
instrument, a device, an appliance or a system
that is used separately or in combination and
which the manufacturer intends to be used for the
in vitro investigation of specimens originating
from the human body, including donor blood and
tissue, exclusively or principally with the objective of providing information on the physiological condition, the health, the illness or a congenital defect or for determining the safety thereof
and the level of compatibility with potential receptors”.
The In Vitro Diagnostics Medical Devices Directive 98/79/EC came into force on 7th December 1998 and has a transition period until 7th June
2000.
CE Comparison
Conclusion
The Directive 98/79 EC relates to medical appliances for in vitro diagnostics and their accessories. The Directive refers to the accessories as
fully-fledged medical appliances for in vitro diagnostics.
The Directive describes a medical appliance
for in vitro diagnostics as follows: “each medical
appliance that is a reagent, a reactive product, a
calibration material, a control material, a kit, an
In conclusion, from the clinical point of view
the market supplied our investigations with easy
and cheap instrumentations suitable to detect the
redox target by means of divalent-trivalent metals
reactivity read through photometric instruments:
the tests have been challenged against other more
cumbersome and have been proven reliable in
different pathological conditions and acute and
chronic illnesses.
In vitro diagnostics 98/79 EC
Requirements of the
European Parliament and of
the Council of 27/10/1998
BAP
FORD
CE certification
The manufacturer has the IVD
(in vitro diagnostic) mark
The manufacturer has the IVD and
Self Testing Certification (CE0344)
Clear IVD intended use
Only on the external cardboard box
On the external cardboard box, on
the blister’s labels and instructions
for use as required by the directive
EN 980-European Standard for
medical and IVD graphical
symbols on labelling
None. The manufacturer does
not comply to the CE Directive
.
Graphical symbols have been
applied as explicitly required by the
CE Directive for the following
information:
• Expire date;
• Manufacturer;
• Temperature;
• Biological symbol;
• Batch number;
• IVD symbol;
• Catalogue number (REF);
• Dispose of after use (do not reuse)
397
B. Palmieri, V. Sblendorio
Even if these point-of-care tests represent an
aspecific redox imbalance perspective their easy
and quick use suggest a very wide range of potential clinical use, either in emergency, or in
routine laboratory.
The main advantages of these procedures is
the very small amount of blood required, and the
chance to compare the results with classic lab exams, in order better qualify, by comparison, the
redox profile of different diseases and to improve
the therapeutic effectiveness with proper antioxidant drugs.
In this perspective, the contemporary dosage
of antioxidant potential is quite necessary, even if
we lack of detailed informations about the specific compound to be supplied.
In one of these measuring device (intended to
testing FORD and FORT) is enclosed also the
uric acid level, whose antioxidant potential has
recently been emphasized; this parameter adds
more informations to the clinical picture of redox-imbalance, focusing the attention of investigators, on nucleic acid metabolism, and the reflex of their tunover on general antioxidative status of the patient.
Finally, even if we know the role of the oxidative balance in some pathogenetic diseases, the
point of care dedicated instruments highlight by
comparison with other lab exams a potential coresponsibility and some therapeutic options.
References
1) WAYNER DD, B URTON GW, I NGOLD KU, L OCKE S.
Quantitative measurement of the total, peroxyl
radical-trapping antioxidant capacity of human
blood plasma by controlled peroxidation. FEBS
Lett 1985; 187: 33-37.
2) GLAZER AN. Phycoerythrin fluorescence-based assay for reactive oxygen species. Methods Enzymol 1990; 186: 161-168.
3) CAO G, VERDON CP, WU AH, WANG H, PRIOR RL. Automated assay of oxygen radical absorbance capacity assay using the COBAS FARA II. Clin
Chem 1995; 41: 1738-1744.
6) VERDE V, FOGLIANO V, RITIENI A, MAIANI G, MORISCO F,
CAPORASO N. Use of N,N-dimethyl-p-phenylenediamine to evaluate the oxidative status of human
plasma. Free Radic Res 2002; 36: 869-873.
7) BIURDON RH. Superoxide and hydrogen peroxide
in relation to mammalian cell proliferation. Free
Radic Biol Med 1995; 18: 775-794.
8) KOPPENOL WH. The Haber-Weiss cycle–70 years
later. Redox Rep 2001; 6: 229-234.
9) DAL NEGRO RW, VISCONTI M, MICHELETTO C, POMARI
C, SQUARANTI M, TURATI C, TREVISAN F, TORNELLA S.
Normal values and reproducibility of the major oxidative stress obtained thanks to FORM system.
GIMT; Ital J Chest Dis 2003; 57: 199-209.
10) NEYENS E, BAEYENS J. A review of classic Fenton’s
peroxidation as an advanced oxidation technique.
J Hazard Mater 2003; 98: 33-50.
11) YOON J, LEE Y, KIM S. Investigation of the reaction
pathway of OH radicals produced by Fenton oxidation in the conditions of wastewater treatment.
Water Sci Technol 2001; 44: 15-21.
12) LU MC, LIN CJ, LIAO CH, TING WP, HUANG RY. Influence of pH on the dewatering of activated sludge
by Fenton’s reagent. Water Sci Technol 2001; 44:
327-332.
13) MILLER NJ, SAMPSON J, CANDEIAS LP, BRAMLEY PM,
RICE-EVANS CA. Antioxidant activities of carotenes
and xanthophylls. FEBS Lett 1996; 384: 240-242.
14) KAMPA M, NISTIKAKI A, TSAOUSIS V, MALIARAKI N, NOTAS
G, CASTANAS E. A new automated method for the
determination of the Total Antioxidant Capacity
(TAC) of human plasma, based on the crocin
bleaching assay. BMC Clin Pathol 2002; 2: 3.
15) MANTOVANI G, MADEDDU C, MACCIÒ A, GRAMIGNANO
G, LUSSO MR, MASSA E, ASTARA G, SERPE R. Cancer
related anorexia/cachexia syndrome and oxidative stress: an innovative approach beyond current treatment. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers
Prev 2004; 13: 1651-1659.
16) MACCIÒ A, MADEDDU C, MASSA D, MUDU MC, LUSSO
MR, GRAMIGNANO G, SERPE R, MELIS GB, MANTOVANI
G. Hemoglobin levels correlate with interleukin-6
levels in patients with advanced untreated epithelial ovarian cancer: role of inflammation in cancerrelated anemia. Blood 2005;1 06:362-367.
17) A BRAMSON JL, H OOPER WC, J ONES DP, A SHFAQ S,
RHODES SD, WEINTRAUB WS, HARRISON DG, QUYYUMI
AA, VACCARINO V. Association between novel oxidative stress markers and C-reactive protein
among adults without clinical coronary heart disease. Atherosclerosis 2005; 178: 115-121.
4) MILLER NJ, RICE-EVANS C, DAVIES MJ, GOPINATHAN V,
MILNER A. A novel method for measuring antioxidant capacity and its application to monitoring the
antioxidant status in premature neonates. Clin Sci
1993; 84: 407-412.
18) JONES DP, CARLSON JL, MODY VC, CAI J, LYNN MJ,
S TERNBERG P. Redox state of glutathione in human plasma. Free Radic Biol Med 2000; 28:
625-635.
5) GHISELLI A, SERAFINI M, MAIANI G, AZZINI E, FERROLUZZI A. A fluorescence-based method for measuring total plasma antioxidant capability. Free
Rad Biol Med 1995; 18: 29-36.
19) GRAMIGNANO G, LUSSO MR, MADEDDU C, MASSA E,
SERPE R, DEIANA L, LACONICA G, DESSI M, SPIGA C, ASTARA G, MACCIÒ A, MANTOVANI G. Efficacy of l-carnitine administration on fatigue, nutritional status,
398
Oxidative stress tests: overview on reliability and use. Part II
oxidative stress, and related quality of life in 12
advanced cancer patients undergoing anticancer
therapy. Nutrition 2006; 22: 136-145.
ercising muscle from ALS patients. Amyotroph
Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 2002; 3:
57-62.
20) MANTOVANI G, MACCIÒ A, MADEDDU C, GRAMIGNANO
G, LUSSO MR, SERPE R, MASSA E, ASTARA G, DEIANA L.
A phase II study with antioxidants, both in the diet
and supplemented, pharmaconutritional support,
progestagen, and anti-cyclooxygenase-2 showing
efficacy and safety in patients with cancer-related
anorexia/cachexia and oxidative stress. Cancer
Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15: 1030-1034.
29) CAMPISE M, BAMONTI F, NOVEMBRINO C, IPPOLITO S,
TARANTINO A, CORNELLI U, LONATI S, CESANA BM, PONTICELLI C. Oxidative stress in kidney transplant patients. Transplantation 2003; 76: 1474-1478.
21) FRANZINI A, LURASCHI P, PAGANI A. Direct measurement of reactive oxygen metabolites in blood
serum: analytical assessment of a novel method.
Biochimica Clinica 1996; Suppl(1/5-6): 89.
22) TROTTI R, CARRATELLI M, BARBIERI M, MICIELI G, BOSONE
D, RONDANELLI M, BO P. Oxidative stress and a
thrombophilic condition in alcoholics without severe liver disease. Haematologica 2001; 86: 85-91.
23) BUONOCORE G, PERRONE S, LONGINI M, TERZUOLI L,
BRACCI R. Total hydroperoxide and advanced oxidation protein products in preterm hypoxic babies. Pediatr Res 2000; 47: 221-224.
24) BUONOCORE G, PERRONE S, LONGINI M, VEZZOSI P,
MARZOCCHI B, PAFFETTI P, BRACCI R. Oxidative stress
in preterm neonates at birth and on the seventh
day of life. Pediatr Res 2002; 52: 46-49.
25) PARMIGIANI S, GAMBINI L, MASSARI A, PEZZANI I, PAYER
C, BEVILACQUA G. Evaluation of reactive oxygen
metabolites with micromethod in neonates: determination of standards of normality in full-term babies. Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense 1997;
68(Suppl1): 103-106.
26) PARMIGIANI S, PAYER C, M ASSARI A, B USSOLANTI G,
BEVILACQUA G. Normal values of reactive oxygen
metabolites on the cord-blood of full-term infants
with a colorimetric method. Acta Biomed Ateneo
Parmense 2000; 71: 59-64.
27) S Q U I T T I R, R O S S I N I PM, C A S S E T TA E, M O F FA F,
PASQUALETTI P, CORTESI M, COLLOCA A, ROSSI L, FINAZZIAGRO A. d-penicillamine reduces serum oxidative
stress in Alzheimer’s disease patients. Eur J Clin
Invest 2002; 32: 51-59.
28) SICILIANO G, D’AVINO C, DEL CORONA A, BARSACCHI R,
KUSMIC C, ROCCHI A, PASTORINI E, MURRI L. Impaired
oxidative metabolism and lipid peroxidation in ex-
30) USBERTI M, GERARDI GM, GAZZOTTI RM, BENEDINI S,
ARCHETTI S, SUGHERINI L, VALENTINI M, TIRA P, BUFANO
G, ALBERTINI A, DI LORENZO D. Oxidative stress and
cardiovascular disease in dialyzed patients.
Nephron 2002; 91: 25-33.
31) USBERTI M, BUFANO G, LIMA G, GAZZOTTI RM, TIRA P,
GERARDI G, DI LORENZO D. Increased red blood cell
survival reduces the need of erythropoietin in hemodialyzed patients treated with exogenous glutathione and vitamin E-modified membrane. Contrib Nephrol 1999; 127: 208-214.
32) USBERTI M, GERARDI G, BUFANO G, TIRA P, MICHELI A,
ALBERINI A, FLORIDI A, DI LORENZO D, GALLI F. Effects
of erythropoietin and vitamin E-modified membrane on plasma oxidative stress markers and
anemia of hemodialyzed patients. Am J Kidney
Dis 2002; 40: 590-599.
33) CARRATELLI M, PORCARO R, RUSCICA M, DE SIMONE E,
BERTELLI AA, CORSI MM. Reactive Oxygen Metabolites (ROMs) and prooxidant status in children
with Down Syndrome. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res
2001; 21: 79-84.
34) IAMELE L, FIOCCHI R, VERNOCCHI A. Evaluation of an
automated spectrophotometric assay for reactive
oxygen metabolites in serum. Clin Chem Lab
2002; 40: 673-676.
35) DOSSETT A, ARENDS J. Hydroperoxides in venous
blood: a comparison between two photometric
methods. J Klinik fùr Tumorbiologie an der AlbertLudwigs-Universitat, Freiburg.
36) GIOVANNINI F, MASINI A, TORRI C, TRENTI T. Confronto
tra due metodi di misura dei lipidi-idroperossidi
nel plasma. Biochimica Clinica 2004; 20: 200, 36°
Congresso Nazionale SIBioC.
37) VASSALLE C, MASINI S, CARPEGGIANI C, L’ABBATE A, BONI
C, ZUCCHELLI GC. In vivo total antioxidant capacity:
comparison of two different analytical methods.
Clin Chem Lab Med 2004; 42: 84-89.
––––––––––––––––––––
Acknowledgements
The Authors thanks to Dr. Carla Torri from Callegari
Spa-Catellani group, Parma, Italy, for a permission of
reviewing their bibliography archives.
399