Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Graviton laser

2016, International Journal of Modern Physics D

We consider the possibility of creating a graviton laser. The lasing medium would be a system of contained, ultra cold neutrons. Ultra cold neutrons are a quantum mechanical system that interacts with gravitational fields and with the phonons of the container walls. It is possible to create a population inversion by pumping the system using the phonons. We compute the rate of spontaneous emission of gravitons and the rate of the subsequent stimulated emission of gravitons. The gain obtainable is directly proportional to the density of the lasing medium and the fraction of the population inversion. The applications of a graviton laser would be interesting.

UdeM-GPP-TH-16-250 arXiv:16xx.xxxx Graviton laser A. Landry∗ and M. B. Paranjape† Groupe de physique des particules, Département de physique, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, succ. centre-ville, arXiv:1604.02762v1 [gr-qc] 11 Apr 2016 Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3C 3J7 Abstract ABSTRACT We consider the possibility of creating a graviton laser. The lasing medium would be a system of contained, ultra cold neutrons. Ultra cold neutrons are a quantum mechanical system that interacts with gravitational fields and with the phonons of the container walls. It is possible to create a population inversion by pumping the system using the phonons. We compute the rate of spontaneous emission of gravitons and the rate of the subsequent stimulated emission of gravitons. The gain obtainable is directly proportional to the density of the lasing medium and the fraction of the population inversion. The applications of a graviton laser would be interesting. “Essay written for the Gravity Research Foundation 2016 Awards for Essays on Gravitation.” Corresponding author M. B. Paranjape, [email protected] PACS numbers: 73.40.Gk,75.45.+j,75.50.Ee,75.50.Gg,75.50.Xx,75.75.Jn 1 INTRODUCTION A laser works by the principle that in a (lasing) medium, where there are more quantum excited states than de-excited states, spontaneously emitted photons can subsequently stimulate the emission of more photons that are coherent with the stimulating photon. The process can cascade multiple times creating an avalanche of coherent photons. If the gain of the lasing medium is sufficiently high, a significant amplification can be obtained with a single pass, there is no need for reflecting mirrors. In this essay, we examine the possibility that such amplification can be obtained for gravitons. Ultra-cold neutrons, [1] are normally defined to have such low kinetic energy that they are unable to penetrate the material walls of a container. The kinetic energy of the neutrons has to be typically less than about 300 nano eV. When the energy of a neutron is in this range, then its de Broglie wavelength is of the order of 100 nanometres, which means that the neutron coherently senses at once almost a thousand nuclei of the wall of the container, actually through the strong interaction. The neutrons have negligible other interactions with the material of the container. The zero Fourier component of the strong interaction between the nuclei and the neutron is all that is relevant and corresponds to a constant energy valued work function. To be able to penetrate into into the walls of the container, the neutrons have to have greater kinetic energy than the threshold. Failing that, the neutrons are reflected perfectly. We will consider an ensemble of even colder neutrons. Mili-Kelvin neutrons have kinetic energies that are of the order of a few pico eV. At such low energies, the neutrons become sensitive to the gravitational field of the earth. Indeed the Q-bounce experiment [2] measures exactly the consequences the quantum mechanical interaction of the neutrons with this gravitational field. For mili-Kelvin neutrons bouncing on a smooth, horizontal base, the Schrödinger equation for the neutrons is easily, analytically solved. The potential in the z direction is mN gz (where mN is the neutron mass and g is the earth’s gravitational acceleration) and the boundary condition at z = 0 corresponds to an effectively, infinite energy barrier. The eigenfunctions are simply the Airy functions ψn (z) = Ai( zz0 − αn ) where z03 = ~2 2gm2N and −αn is the nth zero of the Airy function with energy eigenvalue En = mN gz0 αn [3]. An approximate analytic 2/3 formula for the energy levels is given by En ≈ 1, 69 n − 14 peV . Transitions between these quantum levels have already been induced and observed by pumping the system by 2 mechanically vibrating the base at the appropriate frequency, approximately 600Hz. The neutrons can be lifted to say the third excited level using the mechanical pumping method. Pumping at the resonant frequency for the transition between the first and third levels asymptotically will populate each of these levels equally. But then there will be a population inversion with respect to the second excited level. Thus spontaneous emission of a graviton from a transition from the third to the second level, and the subsequent stimulated emission of gravitons could yield significant, laser type amplification of the gravitational wave. QUANTUM GRAVITONS AND THE AMPLITUDE FOR SPONTANEOUS AND STIMULATED EMISSION In a zero order approximation, gravitons correspond to the non-interacting excitations of the quantized, linearized Einstein equations. These equations describe the free field dynamics of a massless spin 2 field. The quantization is trivial and well understood. The quantum gravitational field corresponds to the tensor hµν , which can be decomposed into its Fourier modes hµν = Z 3 d k  µ µ eikµ x e−ikµ x √ A(~k)ǫµν + √ ǫ∗µν A† (~k) V V  (1) where ǫµν is the polarization tensor for massless spin two particles and the operators A† (~k) and A(~k) satisfy the simple algebra of annihilation and creation operators h i A(~k), A† (~k ′ ) = δ 3 (~k − ~k ′ ). (2) These operators respectively create and destroy one free graviton of momentum ~k. The frequency satisfies k0 = |~k| which is appropriate for a massless particle. The gravitational field of the graviton, interacts with the system of ultra-cold neutrons by distorting the space-time in which the neutron is immersed. The ambient space-time is that which corresponds to the gravitational field of the earth. This space-time is simply the Schwarzschild geometry    −1 2GM⊕ 2 2 2GM⊕ c dτ = 1 − c dt − 1 − dr 2 − r 2 dΩ2 c2 r c2 r 2 2 (3) where the symbol ⊕ stands for the earth. Superimposed on this space-time is that of the gravitational wave of the graviton c2 dτ 2 = c2 dt2 − dx2 − (1 + h(x − ct))dy 2 − (1 − h(x − ct))dz 2 3 (4) for a gravitational wave propagating in the x direction polarized in the + sense in Minkowski space-time. In the weak field linear approximation, the combined metric is     2GM⊕ 2 2 2GM⊕ 2 2 ~ 2 /r 2 c dτ = 1 − c dt − 1 + (~x · dx) c2 r c2 r −h(x − ct)dy 2 + h(x − ct)dz 2 − r 2 dΩ2 . (5) The classical dynamics of the neutrons, apart from the reflection from the base, is governed by the geodesic equation: ν µ d2 xi i dx dx + Γµν =0 (6) dτ 2 dτ dτ The connection is given to first order by Γλµν = (1/2)η λσ (∂µ hσν + ∂ν hσµ − ∂σ hµν ). We follow closely the exposition by Bertschinger in [4], decomposing the gravitational field as h00 = −2φ, h0i = wi , hij = −2ψδij + 2sij (7) ≈ where δ ij sij = 0, we have wi = 0, φ = GM⊕ /r, ψ = GM⊕ /3r and sij = s⊕ ij + sij with ≈ 3 2 ≈ s⊕ ij = (2GM⊕ /r )(xi xj − (r /3)δij ) and szz = −syy = h(x − t) where we now add the use the symbol ≈ for the gravitational wave. The Hamiltonian for the system is given by H(xi , πj ) = (1 + φ)E(pj ) where E(pj ) = (δ ij pi pj + m2N )1/2 (8) with pi = (1 + ψ)πi − (δ ij πi πj + m2N )1/2 wi − sj i πj which in our case becomes just pi = (1 + ψ)πi − sj i πj . As πi and pi differ only by first order terms, we get the Hamiltonian to first order (ψδ ij − sij )πi πj + φE(πj ). E(πj ) Expanding to second order in the canonical momentum gives H(xi , πj ) = E(πj ) + H(xi , πj ) = mN + |~π |2 (ψδ ij − sij )πi πj |~π |2 + + φ(mN + ). 2mN mN 2mN (9) (10) From this expression we extract our basic Hamiltonian of the neutron interacting with the gravitational field of the earth H0 (xi , πj ) = |π|2 + mN φ 2mN (11) subtracting off the rest mass, and the perturbation, which we split into two terms φ|~π|2 (ψδ ij − s⊕ ij )πi πj + 2mN mN ≈ ij −s πi πj . H ≈ (xi , πj ) = mN H ⊕ (xi , πj ) = 4 (12) (13) The Schrödinger equation resulting from Eqn. (11) is essentially free in the x and y directions, but in the z direction it is   −~2 d2 + mN gz ψ(z, t) = Eψ(z, t). 2mN dz 2 (14) the perturbation from Eqn.(12) induces some perturbative changes in the energies and wavefunctions of H0 (xi , πj ), however, these changes are static and do not give rise to any transitions, spontaneous or stimulated between levels. The time dependent perturbation that is relevant, from Eqn.(13) (replacing h(x − ct) → metric perturbation) is ≈ i H (x , πj ) = − √ G h(x c2 − ct) the canonically normalized √ G h(x − ct)πz2 . c2 mN (15) Then amplitude for spontaneous or stimulated emission of a graviton is proportional to the matrix element hψn′ | − πz2 |ψn i mN hψn′ | − which, using Eqn.(14), gives πz2 |ψn i = hψn′ |(2mN gz − 2En )|ψn i mN = hψn′ |2mN gz|ψn i. (16) The matrix element is easily computed using the exact eigenfunctions and the integral Z ∞ −2Ai′ (−αm )Ai′ (−αn ) (17) dyyAi(y − αm )Ai(y − αn ) = (αm − αn )2 0 which gives hψn′ |2mN gz|ψn i = − 4mN gz0 . (αn′ − αn )2 (18) The rate, per unit time and volume, of spontaneous or stimulated emission of gravitons is then is given by, modifying a calculation in Baym, [5] G 4π 2 c2 (Nk + 1) × c4 ckV × |hψn′ |2mN gz|ψn i|2 δ(En′ − En − ~ck) dΓemm. n′ →n = (19) where Nk is the number of photons involved in the stimulated emission, and when Nk = 0 we get the rate for spontaneous emission. (The whole system is imagined in a box of volume V .) There are V d3 k/(2π)3 states in the volume d3 k of phase space and as Ek = ~c|k| V d3 k 2 dEk dΩ = V E k (2π)3 (2π~c)3 5 (20) states per unit energy. Then integrating Eqn.(19) over the energy of the emitted graviton we get dΓemm. n′ →n G (En′ − En )dΩ = 4 (Nk + 1) c 2π~2 c Since En = mN gz0 αn where z03 = Γemm. n′ →n ~2 2gm2N  4mN gz0 (αn′ − αn )2 2 and integrating over directions, we get 3  mN gz0 2G = 2 5 (Nk + 1) ~ c αn ′ − αn   G mN g 2 ~2 = 2 5 (Nk + 1) ~ c (αn′ − αn )3   mN g 2 G = 5 (Nk + 1) c (αn′ − αn )3 (21) (22) POPULATION INVERSION We can obtain a population inversion by mechanically vibrating the base at the resonant frequency corresponding to the transition between two levels [2]. Resonant pumping of a system has the property that the probability of inducing a transition from level n to level n′ is equal to the probability of inducing a transition in the opposite direction. The long time behaviour of such a system is governed by the simple equations, with Nn (t) the occupation number of the neutrons in the nth level, Ṅn′ (t) = −λNn′ (t) + λNn (t) Ṅn (t) = −λNn (t) + λNn′ (t) (23) where λ is the effective rate of transitions per unit time. The solution of this system is (Nn′ (0)(1 + e−2λt ) + Nn (0)(1 − e−2λt )) 2 (Nn (0)(1 + e−2λt ) + Nn′ (0)(1 − e−2λt )) Nn (t) = 2 Nn′ (t) = (24) (25) Hence in the long time limit, the populations go to Nn′ (t) = Nn (t) → 21 (Nn (0) + Nn′ (0)). If we pump the system between levels n and n+m, with m > 1, there will be intermediate levels in between the two with respect to which there will be a population inversion. Then one could imagine spontaneous emission of a graviton by a transition from the upper level to one of the intermediate levels. The amplification factor κ of a lasing medium is given by κ = σ(Nn′ − Nn ) 6 (26) where σ is the cross section of induced transitions between the levels of the medium, [6]. The cross section is trivially related to the transition rate for spontaneous emission computed above in Eqn.(22) by dividing by the incident flux. Evidently a population inversion, Nn′ > Nn is necessary for any amplification. DISCUSSION The rate computed in Eqn.(22) is absurdly small for terrestrial applications. But if the neutron is in a highly excited state we do get some enhancement. The energy levels behave as En ∼ n2/3 , which comes from a similar behaviour of the zeros of the Airy functions. Clearly for two highly excited levels n + m and n as n → ∞, we get αn+m − αn ∼ m . n1/3 (27) Therefore the denominator in Eqn.(22) can in principle be made arbitrarily small, giving a corresponding enhancement of the probability of spontaneous emission. In general, for levels separated by gravitons of energies in the deep infrared limit, there is no suppression. Observing and controlling stimulated amplification of gravitons would be of unimaginable importance. One can also imagine the process of lasing amplification occurring on the surface of a star, say a neutron star. Here the surface gravity can be 1012 times greater than on the surface of the earth. This yields an additional factor of 1024 . Coupled with a pair of excited levels, it is not impossible that there could be a lasing amplification of spontaneously emitted gravitons. Furthermore, speculatively, if mN is replaced by a considerably heavier, as yet undiscovered, supersymmetric or dark matter particle, again there could be substantial increase in the rate of spontaneous emmission. Finally, one can imagine, in an astrophysical scenario, that an enormous number of gravitons are somehow released in some cataclysmic event, for example, the recently observed black-hole merger event, [7]. Then Nk could be sufficiently high to compensate for the other factors that are rendering the amplitude small. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Biothermica Corporation, Sibylla Hesse foundation and NSERC of Canada for their financial support. We thank Bhujyo Bhattacharya and Eric Dupuis for useful 7 discussions. ∗ [email protected][email protected] [1] R. Golub, D. Richardson, and S. K. Lamoreaux, Ultra-cold neutrons (CRC Press, 1991). [2] T. Jenke, D. Stadler, H. Abele, and P. Geltenbort, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 611, 318 (2009), ISSN 0168-9002, particle Physics with Slow Neutrons, URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900209015538. [3] A. Landry and M. B. Paranjape (2016), 1601.06132. [4] E. Bertschinger (2000), URL http://web.mit.edu/edbert/GR/gr6.pdf. [5] G. Baym, Lectures on Quantum Mechanics, Advanced book program (Addison-Wesley, 1990), ISBN 9780805306675, URL https://books.google.ca/books?id=6KrvAAAAMAAJ. [6] L. Tarasov, Laser Physics (URSS, 2014), ISBN 9785396006126, URL https://books.google.ca/books?id=ERV6rgEACAAJ. [7] B. P. Abbott et al. (Virgo, LIGO Scientific), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016), 1602.03837. 8