Manuele Gragnolati
Manuele Gragnolati is Full Professor of Medieval Italian Literature at Sorbonne Université, Associate Director of the ICI Berlin Institute for Cultural Inquiry (http://www.ici-berlin.org), Senior Research Fellow at Somerville College, Oxford (http://www.some.ox.ac.uk), as well as Vice President of the Société Dantesque de France. He studied Classical Philology, Medieval Studies, and Italian Literature at the Universities of Pavia (BA and MA), Paris IV-Sorbonne (MA) and Columbia in NYC (PhD). Before joining the University of Paris-Sorbonne, he taught at Dartmouth College from 1999 to 2003 and from 2003 to 2015 at the University of Oxford, where he was Full Professor of Italian Literature.
A significant part of his research, including his first monograph Experiencing the 'Afterlife: Soul and Body in Dante and Medieval Culture' (2005), focuses on Dante and medieval literature and culture, especially on the significance of corporeality in thirteenth- and fourteenth-century eschatology. He is also interested in the concept of linguistic subjectivity from Dante’s 'Vita Nova' to the present, in modern appropriations of medieval texts, and in feminist and queer theory. His second monograph 'Amor che move: Linguaggio del corpo e forma del desiderio in Dante, Pasolini e Morante' (2013), offers a diffractive exploration of body, language, desire in Dante and two authors who have engaged with Dante’s oeuvre in the late twentieth century from a minor, ‘eccentric’ position. Lyric poetry is another of his interests and in this field he has collaborated on a substantial commentary on Dante’s Rime and published essays on medieval and modern authors as well as the volume 'Possibilities of Lyric : Reading Petrarch in Dialogue' (2020), which he coauthored with Francesca Southerden ad which explores the potential of the lyric mode through a comparative reading of Petrarch’s 'Canzoniere'.
Manuele Gragnolati enjoys studying and teaching literature for its critical potential to challenge normative ways of thinking and is particularly interested in texts that propose different figurations of reality, whether in the past or in the present. He believes in an interdisciplinary approach to culture and in collaborating with colleagues with different intellectual histories and backgrounds. An example is the recent 'Oxford Handbook of Dante' (2021), which he conceived and edited with two colleagues and which includes 45 essays by scholars from all over the world and offers an updated, transnational, and plural take on Dante’s oeuvre. At the ICI Berlin and elsewhere he has run several interdisciplinary projects on Dante, Elsa Morante, Pier Paolo Pasolini, and other topics which have often resulted in collective volumes, including: 'Opennes in Medieval Europe' (2022); 'Petrolio 25 anni dopo. Biopolitica, eros e verità nell’ultimo romanzo di Pier Paolo Pasolini' (2020); 'Vita nova. Fiore. Epistola XIII' (2018); 'Aimer on ne pas aimer: une question, deux textes. Boccace; Elegia di madonna Fiammetta et Corbaccio' (2018); 'De/Constituting Wholes: Towards Partiality Without Parts' (2017); 'The Scandal of Self-Contradiction: Pier Paolo Pasolini’s Multistable Subjectivities, Traditions, Geographies' (2012); 'Desire in Dante and the Middle Ages' (2012); 'Metamorphosing Dante: Appropriations, Manipulations, and Rewritings in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries' (2011); 'Dante’s Plurilingualism: Authority, Knowledge, Subjectivity' (2010); 'Aspects of the Performative in Medieval Culture' (2010); 'The Power of Disturbance: Elsa Morante’s Aracoeli' (2009).
With Francesca Southerden he is currently working on a book project tentatively entitled "Ecologies of Affect: Unearthing the Posthuman in Dante, Petrarch, and Boccaccio".
A significant part of his research, including his first monograph Experiencing the 'Afterlife: Soul and Body in Dante and Medieval Culture' (2005), focuses on Dante and medieval literature and culture, especially on the significance of corporeality in thirteenth- and fourteenth-century eschatology. He is also interested in the concept of linguistic subjectivity from Dante’s 'Vita Nova' to the present, in modern appropriations of medieval texts, and in feminist and queer theory. His second monograph 'Amor che move: Linguaggio del corpo e forma del desiderio in Dante, Pasolini e Morante' (2013), offers a diffractive exploration of body, language, desire in Dante and two authors who have engaged with Dante’s oeuvre in the late twentieth century from a minor, ‘eccentric’ position. Lyric poetry is another of his interests and in this field he has collaborated on a substantial commentary on Dante’s Rime and published essays on medieval and modern authors as well as the volume 'Possibilities of Lyric : Reading Petrarch in Dialogue' (2020), which he coauthored with Francesca Southerden ad which explores the potential of the lyric mode through a comparative reading of Petrarch’s 'Canzoniere'.
Manuele Gragnolati enjoys studying and teaching literature for its critical potential to challenge normative ways of thinking and is particularly interested in texts that propose different figurations of reality, whether in the past or in the present. He believes in an interdisciplinary approach to culture and in collaborating with colleagues with different intellectual histories and backgrounds. An example is the recent 'Oxford Handbook of Dante' (2021), which he conceived and edited with two colleagues and which includes 45 essays by scholars from all over the world and offers an updated, transnational, and plural take on Dante’s oeuvre. At the ICI Berlin and elsewhere he has run several interdisciplinary projects on Dante, Elsa Morante, Pier Paolo Pasolini, and other topics which have often resulted in collective volumes, including: 'Opennes in Medieval Europe' (2022); 'Petrolio 25 anni dopo. Biopolitica, eros e verità nell’ultimo romanzo di Pier Paolo Pasolini' (2020); 'Vita nova. Fiore. Epistola XIII' (2018); 'Aimer on ne pas aimer: une question, deux textes. Boccace; Elegia di madonna Fiammetta et Corbaccio' (2018); 'De/Constituting Wholes: Towards Partiality Without Parts' (2017); 'The Scandal of Self-Contradiction: Pier Paolo Pasolini’s Multistable Subjectivities, Traditions, Geographies' (2012); 'Desire in Dante and the Middle Ages' (2012); 'Metamorphosing Dante: Appropriations, Manipulations, and Rewritings in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries' (2011); 'Dante’s Plurilingualism: Authority, Knowledge, Subjectivity' (2010); 'Aspects of the Performative in Medieval Culture' (2010); 'The Power of Disturbance: Elsa Morante’s Aracoeli' (2009).
With Francesca Southerden he is currently working on a book project tentatively entitled "Ecologies of Affect: Unearthing the Posthuman in Dante, Petrarch, and Boccaccio".
less
InterestsView All (17)
Uploads
Books by Manuele Gragnolati
In her extensive interpretive essay, Judith Revel submits Lefort’s encounter with Dante to a transformative mis/reading and shows the importance of Dante’s text for Lefort’s conception of political philosophy. She carefully reconstructs its radical legacy, all too frequently reduced to a postmarxist turn or even mistaken for an affirmation of liberal democracy.
The two essays are accompanied by a note from their translator, Jennifer Rushworth, and a preface by Christiane Frey.
Available Open-Access at https://www.ici-berlin.org/oa/ci-16
Il volume raccoglie i testi di quattro Workshop tenuti a Firenze, presso la Società Dantesca Italiana: i due dedicati alla «Vita nova» progettati da Manuele Gragnolati e Luca Carlo Rossi (WS 4-5, 2015), quello dedicato al «Fiore» progettato da Natascia Tonelli (WS 2, 2014), e quello dedicato all’«Epistola XIII» progettato da Alberto Casadei (WS 1, 2013). La ricchezza del risultato è anche nella pluralità dei punti di vista, dei metodi e dei problemi. Punto di arrivo di studi decennali e base di partenza per future ricerche.
La «Vita nova», una delle più dense e seducenti opere dantesche, è una complessa riorganizzazione di uno straordinar io passato poetico. L’autoesegesi in prosa si affianca alla riscrittura delle rime, al dialogo con altr i poeti, al discorso filosofico, all’ineffabile mistico, alla riflessione
sui sensi retorici del linguagg io poetico e sulla semantica salvifica delle parole, dei numeri e dei nomi. Il libello si organizza e prende forma parallelamente al suo autore. Le geniali strategie della costruzione di modelli complessi (testo, autore e storia dell’autore) procedono con modifiche e adattamenti puntualmente e sagacemente analizzati negli studi che qui si presentano.
I due poemetti anepigrafi, noti con i nomi moderni di Fiore e Detto d’Amore, sono opera di un autore genialmente attento alla riscrittura del modello, il Roman de la Rose, e molto aggiornato sui contenuti e sulle forme metriche della lir ica duecentesca. Volgarizzamento,
riduzione, citazione e parodia sono tecniche magistralmente adoperate. Tra i contributi, le ultime documentatissime discussioni pro e contra la paternità dantesca e, per la prima volta, un esame dello statuto scientifico dell’attribuzione tardo-trecentesca a Dante.
Sul versante attributivo, una tra le opere dantesche più problematiche e discusse è certamente l’Epistola XIII a Cangrande della Scala: il dibattito è sempre più sottile, assestato com’è su un terreno cronologicamente molto vicino alla data di mor te del Poeta.
Contributi di: Paola Allegretti, Erminia Ardissino, Furio Brugnolo, Alberto Casadei, Marcello Ciccuto, Paolo De Ventura, Luciano Formisano, Manuele Gragnolati, Giuseppe Indizio, Giuseppe Ledda, Elena Lombardi, Lino Pertile, Donato Pirovano, Roberto Rea, Luca Carlo Rossi, Pasquale Stoppelli, Natascia Tonelli, Marco Veglia.
Contributors: Alain Badiou, Bruno Besana, Astrid Deuber-Mankowsky, Francesca Cadel, Luca Di Blasi, Graziella Chiarcossi, Robert Gordon, Agnese Grieco, Bernhard Groß, Christoph Holzhey, Hervé Joubert-Laurencin, Silvia Mazzini, Claudia Peppel, Giovanna Trento"
Contributors: Bruno Besana, Francesca Cadel, Graziella Chiarcossi, Astrid Deuber-Mankowsky, Luca Di Blasi, Robert Gordon, Manuele Gragnolati, Agnese Grieco, Bernhard Groß, Christoph Holzhey, Hervé Joubert-Laurencin, Silvia Mazzini, Claudia Peppel, Giovanna Trento
Contributors: Daniela Boccassini, Bill Burgwinkle, Fabio Camilletti, Peter Dent, Manuele Gragnolati, Tristan Kay, Giuseppe Ledda, Elena Lombardi, Jonathan Morton, Monika Otter, Francesca Southerden, Robert Sturges, Almut Suerbaum, Paola Ureni, Annette Volfing, Marguerite Waller
CONTRIBUTORS: Erminia Ardissino, Piero Boitani, Fabio Camilletti, Antonella Francini, Nicola Gardini, Manuele Gragnolati, Rachel Jacoff, Nick Havely, Tristan Kay, Dennis Looney, Davide Luglio, Manuela Marchesini, Angela Merte-Rankin, James Miller, Federica Pich, Teresa Prudente, Ronald de Rooy, Francesca Southerden, Florian Trabert, Rebecca West
Contributors: Zygmunt Baranski, Emma Bond, Gary Cestaro, Sara Fortuna, Stefano Gensini, Carlo Ginzburg, Manuele Gragnolati, Giulio Lepschy, Laura Lepschy, Bettina Lindorfer, Elena Lombardi, Franco Lo Piparo, Lino Pertile, Giorgio Pressburger, Irène Rosier-Catach, Francesca Southerden, Mirko Tavoni, Jürgen Trabant
"The Power of Disturbance" shows that by creating a 'hallucinatory' representation of the relationship between mother and child, "Aracoeli" questions the classical distinction between subject and object, and proposes an altogether new and subversive kind of writing.
By integrating lesser known texts and scholarship from other disciplines into the specialized field of Dante studies, Gragnolati sheds new light on some of the most vigorously debated and crucial questions raised by the Divine Comedy, including the embryological discourse of Purgatorio 25, the relation between the soul's experience of pain in Purgatory and the devotion that late medieval culture expressed towards Christ's suffering, and the significance of the audacious vision of resurrected bodies that Dante the pilgrim enjoys at the end of his journey. At the same time, Gragnolati brings these questions back into contemporary discussions of medieval eschatology and opens new perspectives for current and future work on embodiment and identity.
In her extensive interpretive essay, Judith Revel submits Lefort’s encounter with Dante to a transformative mis/reading and shows the importance of Dante’s text for Lefort’s conception of political philosophy. She carefully reconstructs its radical legacy, all too frequently reduced to a postmarxist turn or even mistaken for an affirmation of liberal democracy.
The two essays are accompanied by a note from their translator, Jennifer Rushworth, and a preface by Christiane Frey.
Available Open-Access at https://www.ici-berlin.org/oa/ci-16
Il volume raccoglie i testi di quattro Workshop tenuti a Firenze, presso la Società Dantesca Italiana: i due dedicati alla «Vita nova» progettati da Manuele Gragnolati e Luca Carlo Rossi (WS 4-5, 2015), quello dedicato al «Fiore» progettato da Natascia Tonelli (WS 2, 2014), e quello dedicato all’«Epistola XIII» progettato da Alberto Casadei (WS 1, 2013). La ricchezza del risultato è anche nella pluralità dei punti di vista, dei metodi e dei problemi. Punto di arrivo di studi decennali e base di partenza per future ricerche.
La «Vita nova», una delle più dense e seducenti opere dantesche, è una complessa riorganizzazione di uno straordinar io passato poetico. L’autoesegesi in prosa si affianca alla riscrittura delle rime, al dialogo con altr i poeti, al discorso filosofico, all’ineffabile mistico, alla riflessione
sui sensi retorici del linguagg io poetico e sulla semantica salvifica delle parole, dei numeri e dei nomi. Il libello si organizza e prende forma parallelamente al suo autore. Le geniali strategie della costruzione di modelli complessi (testo, autore e storia dell’autore) procedono con modifiche e adattamenti puntualmente e sagacemente analizzati negli studi che qui si presentano.
I due poemetti anepigrafi, noti con i nomi moderni di Fiore e Detto d’Amore, sono opera di un autore genialmente attento alla riscrittura del modello, il Roman de la Rose, e molto aggiornato sui contenuti e sulle forme metriche della lir ica duecentesca. Volgarizzamento,
riduzione, citazione e parodia sono tecniche magistralmente adoperate. Tra i contributi, le ultime documentatissime discussioni pro e contra la paternità dantesca e, per la prima volta, un esame dello statuto scientifico dell’attribuzione tardo-trecentesca a Dante.
Sul versante attributivo, una tra le opere dantesche più problematiche e discusse è certamente l’Epistola XIII a Cangrande della Scala: il dibattito è sempre più sottile, assestato com’è su un terreno cronologicamente molto vicino alla data di mor te del Poeta.
Contributi di: Paola Allegretti, Erminia Ardissino, Furio Brugnolo, Alberto Casadei, Marcello Ciccuto, Paolo De Ventura, Luciano Formisano, Manuele Gragnolati, Giuseppe Indizio, Giuseppe Ledda, Elena Lombardi, Lino Pertile, Donato Pirovano, Roberto Rea, Luca Carlo Rossi, Pasquale Stoppelli, Natascia Tonelli, Marco Veglia.
Contributors: Alain Badiou, Bruno Besana, Astrid Deuber-Mankowsky, Francesca Cadel, Luca Di Blasi, Graziella Chiarcossi, Robert Gordon, Agnese Grieco, Bernhard Groß, Christoph Holzhey, Hervé Joubert-Laurencin, Silvia Mazzini, Claudia Peppel, Giovanna Trento"
Contributors: Bruno Besana, Francesca Cadel, Graziella Chiarcossi, Astrid Deuber-Mankowsky, Luca Di Blasi, Robert Gordon, Manuele Gragnolati, Agnese Grieco, Bernhard Groß, Christoph Holzhey, Hervé Joubert-Laurencin, Silvia Mazzini, Claudia Peppel, Giovanna Trento
Contributors: Daniela Boccassini, Bill Burgwinkle, Fabio Camilletti, Peter Dent, Manuele Gragnolati, Tristan Kay, Giuseppe Ledda, Elena Lombardi, Jonathan Morton, Monika Otter, Francesca Southerden, Robert Sturges, Almut Suerbaum, Paola Ureni, Annette Volfing, Marguerite Waller
CONTRIBUTORS: Erminia Ardissino, Piero Boitani, Fabio Camilletti, Antonella Francini, Nicola Gardini, Manuele Gragnolati, Rachel Jacoff, Nick Havely, Tristan Kay, Dennis Looney, Davide Luglio, Manuela Marchesini, Angela Merte-Rankin, James Miller, Federica Pich, Teresa Prudente, Ronald de Rooy, Francesca Southerden, Florian Trabert, Rebecca West
Contributors: Zygmunt Baranski, Emma Bond, Gary Cestaro, Sara Fortuna, Stefano Gensini, Carlo Ginzburg, Manuele Gragnolati, Giulio Lepschy, Laura Lepschy, Bettina Lindorfer, Elena Lombardi, Franco Lo Piparo, Lino Pertile, Giorgio Pressburger, Irène Rosier-Catach, Francesca Southerden, Mirko Tavoni, Jürgen Trabant
"The Power of Disturbance" shows that by creating a 'hallucinatory' representation of the relationship between mother and child, "Aracoeli" questions the classical distinction between subject and object, and proposes an altogether new and subversive kind of writing.
By integrating lesser known texts and scholarship from other disciplines into the specialized field of Dante studies, Gragnolati sheds new light on some of the most vigorously debated and crucial questions raised by the Divine Comedy, including the embryological discourse of Purgatorio 25, the relation between the soul's experience of pain in Purgatory and the devotion that late medieval culture expressed towards Christ's suffering, and the significance of the audacious vision of resurrected bodies that Dante the pilgrim enjoys at the end of his journey. At the same time, Gragnolati brings these questions back into contemporary discussions of medieval eschatology and opens new perspectives for current and future work on embodiment and identity.
Chiara Cappelletto insegna Retorica ed Estetica contemporanea presso il dipartimento di Filosofi a dell'Università degli Studi di Milano ed è membro associato del CRAL (Centre de Recherches sur les Arts et le Langage) presso l'EHESS di Parigi. Tra i suoi volumi, Neuroestetica. L'arte del cervello (Laterza 2012).
Scritti di Giovanna Borradori, Gianluca Briguglia, Marco Formisano, Manuele Gragnolati,
Antonio Montefusco, Silvia Romani, Miriam Ronzoni, Stefano Simonetta.
Manuele Gragnolati (Paris)
Chair: Manuele Gragnolati (Somerville College, Oxford)
This panel will explore the intersections of physicality, materiality and strategies of representation in the works of Dante. From the rhetorical garments in the Vita Nova, via the rhetorics of physical bodies and their penances in Purgatorio, to the corporeality of faces and forms of presence in the Paradiso, the speakers will explore the manners in which the material and the matter of the text interact.
Beginning with the pre-Commedia works, David Bowe’s paper, ‘Writing as bodies as writing’, will explore the notion that garments, written words, and bodies exist in a creative tension fundamental to Dantean textuality. In the Vita nova the ‘sacrificial’ red of Beatrice’s garments (Cervigni) intersects with the red ink of rubrication and ordinatio in the libello. This, in turn activates the images of poetic writing as dressing the (female) body of intendimento in VN XXV in the specific context of Dante’s textual and poetic practice. By examining these intersections this paper will shed light on the sort of material concern for the body as text which later resurface in Dante’s Convivio and Commedia.
Nicolò Crisafi’s paper, ‘Spiritual fires and literal bodies: the rhetorics of corporal punishment’, will then proceed to Purgatorio to chart the relationship between secular rhetorics of corporal punishment and the Commedia’s own rhetorical treatment of the bodies of sinners in Dante’s otherworld. The rhetorics of corporal punishment in medieval secular justice often charged literal bodies with a symbolic meaning. The Commedia responds to these rhetorics of corporal punishment and stages its own. Focussing largely on Dante’s treatment of sexual sinners, this paper will look at the interplay between the literal and the metaphorical when it comes to the body and its otherworldly punishments, by providing a close reading of the rhetorical figures at play in Dante’s poetic text.
Ascending to the third realm of Dante’s afterlife, Heather Webb’s paper, ‘On the Materiality of the Face in Dante’s Paradiso’ begins from the assertion that faces in Paradiso do what bodies do in Inferno and Purgatorio. As David Ruzicka points out, we have long assumed that all those references to Beatrice's eyes and mouth mean that she is decorporealised. But bodies remain crucial in Paradiso; if, as Robin Kirkpatrick suggests, bodies in Purgatorio are ‘all face’, then we might argue that faces in Paradiso are bodies. This paper focusses on the materiality of the Veronica, the physicality of Beatrice’s face, and modes of personal presence in Paradiso.
Spanning a range of Dante’s works, this panel will offer a broad overview of the textual representations of physical bodies and material cultures.
The symposium takes its cue from Lefort’s suggestive invitation to reconsider Dante’s endorsement of a ‘temporal monarchy’, that is, a secular order restricted to humankind’s common pursuit of earthly happiness and hence fully independent from the Church. Lefort sketches the political reception of Dante’s treatise, referenced by humanist advisors of princes, jurists of absolutist rule, and historians of nation-states alike, which, for him, testifies to a profound historical eccentricity of Dante’s conception rather than a teleology inherent to the modern history of the West. For Lefort, ‘the past always interrogates our present’.
But how can a text of many context-bound contestations such as the Monarchia interrogate present political circumstance? Can Lefort’s reading serve as a model of a historically reflected political philosophy? How to account for historical efficacy without risking a reamalgamation of history and ideas into a redemptive philosophy of history? How to make sense of the entanglement the Monarchia posits between knowledge, happiness, and politics? What is Dante’s conception of the common, what its relation to an essentially collective knowledge that can only be pursued in universal peace?
The symposium brings together scholars from different fields in order to reconsider the Monarchia in dialogue with Lefort’s suggestions and discuss its potentials and limits for imagining politics today.
How can one think of the relationship between the definitiveness of conversion, the teleological reconstruction of the past, and the integrity of the self? What are the implications in terms of subjectivity, gender, and desire? Is conversion a process that can be narrated or rather something constituted through the performance of narration itself? Can the paradox that conversion appears as both the condition and the performative product of self-narration be resolved through conversion’s teleological temporal structure? To what extent is an irreducibly complex experience reduced by being unfolded in such a linear temporality and at what cost for the self and for others? And finally, if Western paradigms not only of autobiography but of narration as such have arguably become inextricably bound up with conversion and its temporality, how can one think of (narrative and textual) forms that propose other articulations of time and subjectivity?
This workshop will problematize the concept of conversion by looking at the interactions between theological discussions and literary re/presentations. It will also question conversion’s temporal structure by considering contemporary critiques of teleology, normativity, and futurity.
With
Phil Knox (Cambridge)
Jonathan Morton (KCL)
Francesca Southerden (Oxford)
Elizabeth Eva Leach (Oxford)
Jennifer Rushworth (Oxford)
Irene Fantappiè (HU Berlin)
Laura Ashe (Oxford)
Marco Nievergelt (Warwick)
Daniel Barber (Pace U)
Marisa Galvez (Stanford)
Christoph Holzhey (ICI Berlin)
Almut Suerbaum (Oxford)
David Bowe (Oxford)
Brilli’s opening piece on "Dante’s Biographies and Historical Studies" draws a cross-disciplinary state of the art over the last decade and raises five major questions (pp. 133-142: 10.1353/das.2018.0004). The answers tackle all or some of these questions from different angles and traditions of studies.
Manuele Gragnolatiand Elena Lombardi focus on Dante’s textual constructions and storytelling ("Autobiografia d’autore," pp. 143-169: 10.1353/das.2018.0005).
Giorgio Inglese reflects on his biography (Dante. Una biografia possible) in a new contribution entitled "Una biografia impossibile" (pp. 161-166: 10.1353/das.2018.0006).
Giuliano Milani develops a methodological reflection on the possibility of writing "La vita di Dante iuxta propria principia" (pp. 167-175: 10.1353/das.2018.0007).
Paolo Pellegrini engages the discussion with the new trend and declares the "De profundis per l’Instant Book" (pp. 176-186: 10.1353/das.2018.0008).
Jean-Claude Schmitt challenges Dante Studies by analyzing Dante’s Vita Nova with the approach of historical anthropology ("Dante en rêveur médiéval : « Memoria » funéraire et récit autobiographique, pp. 187-200: 10.1353/das.2018.0009).
Mirko Tavoni’s "Dante e il ‘paradigma critico dellacontingenza’" (pp. 201-212: 10.1353/das.2018.0010) offers a theoretical reflection on Tavoni’s critical approach.
Finally, David Wallace compares the situation in Dante studies with other research fields, and asks the most uncomfortable question: "Lives of Dante: Why Now?" (pp. 213-222: 10.1353/das.2018.0011).
A Bibliography completes the Forum (pp. 223-231: 10.1353/das.2018.0012).
This issue also includes the essays by Luca Fiorentini, "Archaeology of the Tre Corone: Dante, Petrarca, and Boccaccio in Benvenuto da Imola's Commentary on the Divine Comedy" (pp. 1-21), Ronald L. Martinez, "Dante 'buon sartore' (Paradiso 32.140): Textile Arts, Rhetoric, and Metapoetics at the End of the Commedia" (pp. 22-61), Barbara Newman, "The Seven-StoreyMountain: Mechthild of Hackeborn and Dante's Matelda" (pp. 62-92) and Matthew Collins, "The Forgotten Morgan Dante Drawings, Their Influence on the Marcolini Commedia of 1544, and Their Place within a Visually-Driven Discourse on Dante's Poem" (pp. 93-132).
Dante Studies is available on print and online on Project Muse. Access to Dante Studies is a primary benefit of membership in the Dante Society of America (https://www.dantesociety.org/). Current members receive both print copies and electronic access to current and recent issues. Individual subscriptions are available only through membership in the Society (https://www.dantesociety.org/membership-and-benefits#Joining_or_Renewing). Institutions that wish to subscribe to Dante Studies may place their order online via the JHUP journals website (https://www.press.jhu.edu/journals).
This paper studies the kinds of weathering that are specific to the very different weathers and environments of earth and the three realms of the afterlife, as represented in Dante’s Commedia. It explores different kinds of weathering in Dante’s poem, in their relationship with language, the environment, time, and subjectivity.
Contributi di: Paola Allegretti, Erminia Ardissino, Furio Brugnolo, Alberto Casadei, Marcello Ciccuto, Paolo De Ventura, Luciano Formisano, Manuele Gragnolati, Giuseppe Indizio, Giuseppe Ledda, Elena Lombardi, Lino Pertile, Donato Pirovano, Roberto Rea, Luca Carlo Rossi, Pasquale Stoppelli, Natascia Tonelli, Marco Veglia.
PDF: https://www.hoepli.it/ebook/atti-degli-incontri-sulle-opere-di-dante-i-vita-nova-fiore-epistola-xiii/9788884509413.html