Robotic Process Application RPA-MODULE1
Robotic Process Application RPA-MODULE1
Robotic Process Application RPA-MODULE1
BPM:
• For example, FileNet introduced a digital workflow management system to help better
handle documents (the company would eventually be purchased by IBM). Then there
would come onto the scene ERP vendors, such as PeopleSoft
• All of this would converge into a major wave called BPM .
• For the most part, the focus was on having a comprehensive improvement on business
processes. This would encompass both optimizing systems for employees but also IT assets.
• There were also various business process management software (BPMS) solutions to help
implement BPM.
• One was Laserfiche. Nien-Ling Wacker founded the company in 1987, when she saw the
opportunity to use OCR (optical character recognition) technology to allow users to search
huge volumes of text
So then how is BPM different from RPA?
With BPM, it requires much more time and effort with the implementation because it is about changing extensive
processes, not tasks. There also needs to be detailed documentation and training. Because of this rigorous approach,
BPM is often attractive to industries that are heavily regulated, such as financial services and healthcare.
However, the risk is that there may be too much structure, which can stifle innovation and agility.On the other hand,
RPA can be complementary to BPM. That is, you can first undergo a BPM implementation to greatly improve core
processes. Then you can look to RPA to fill in the gaps.
BPO :
• This is when a company outsources a business service function like payroll, customer support, procurement, and
HR.
• The market is massive, with revenues forecasted to reach $343.2 billion by 2025 (according to Grand View
Research). Some of the top players in the industry include ADP, Accenture, Infosys, IBM, TCS, and Cognizant.
• As should be no surprise, one of the big attractions of BPO is the benefit of lower wage rates in other countries
(this is often referred to as “labor arbitrage”). The employee bases will also often be educated and multilingual.
bases will also often be educated and multilingual.
BPO will have three types of strategies:
• Offshore: This is where the employees are in another country, usually far away.
• Nearshore: This is when the BPO is in a neighboring country. True, there are usually higher costs but there is the
benefit of being able to conveniently visit the vendor. This can greatly help with the collaboration.
• Onshore: The vendor is in the same country. For example, there can be wide differences in wages in the United
There are drawbacks with a BPO :
• Perhaps the most notable one is the quality issue (you know the situation when you call a
company and get an agent you can barely understand!).
• Yet here are some others to consider:
• Security: If a BPO company is developing an app with your company’s data, are there enough
precautions in place so there is not a breach? Even if so, it can still be difficult to enforce and
manage.
• Costs: Over the years, countries like China and India have seen rising labor costs. This has
resulted in companies moving to other locations, which can be disruptive and expensive.
• Politics: This can be a wildcard. Instability can easily mean having to abandon a BPO operator
in a particular country.
BPA :
• This is the use of technology to automate a complete process. One common use case is
onboarding.
• For example, bringing on a new employee involves many steps, which are repeatable and
entail lots of paperwork. For a large organization, the process can be time-consuming and
expensive. But BPA can streamline everything, allowing for the onboarding at scale.
• OK, this kind of sounds like RPA, right? Yes, this is true. But there is a difference in degree.
RPA is really about automating a part of the process, whereas BPA will take on all the steps.
1.7 Consumer Willingness for Automation
• The automation of consumer-facing activities, such as with chatbots on a smartphone or
web site, are becoming more ubiquitous.
• Consider a report from Helpshift, an AI-based digital customer service platform automating
80% of customer support issues for huge D2C (direct-to-consumer) brands including
companies like Flipboard, Microsoft, Tradesy, and 60 others. Its report is based on the
analysis of 75 million customer service tickets and 71 million bot-sent messages.
Here are some of the findings:
• A total of 55% of the respondents – and 65% of millennials – prefer chatbots with customer
service so long as it is more efficient and reduces phone time to resolve an issue and
explain a problem.
• A total of 49% say they appreciate the 24/7 availability of chatbots.- Granted, there is much
progress to be made. Chatbot technology is still in the early phases and can be glitchy, if
not downright annoying in certain circumstances. But in theyears to come, this form of
automation will likely become more important – and also a part of the RPA roadmap.
• According to the CEO of Helpshift, Linda Crawford: “Seeing as the vast majority of
Americans dread contacting customer support, there’s a huge opportunity here for
chatbots to fill the void and improve the customer support experience for consumers—and
1.8 The Workforce of the Future
• The interesting thing is that the fundamentals of work have not changed much since then. True, there has
been the trend of the gig economy, in which people get paid for offering services through Uber and Lyft. Yet
when it comes to office work, the structure has remained quite durable.
• According to research from the McKinsey Global Institute, white collar workers still spend 60% of their time on
manual tasks, such as with answering e-mails, using spreadsheets, writing notes, and making calls
• In light of all this, RPA is likely to have a significant impact on the workplace because more and more of the
repetitive processes will be automated away. One potential consequence is that there may be growing job
losses.
• A survey from Forrester predicts that – as of 2025 – software automation will mean the loss of 9% of the world’s jobs or
230 million. Then again, the new technologies and approaches will open up many new opportunities.
• Its analysis shows that technologies like RPA could automate a whopping 45% of the activities of a company’s workforce.
Now when a company engages in an automation project, the CEO will usually not talk about job loss. It’s something that
will frighten the workforce and generate awful headlines. Instead the messaging will be vague, focusing on the overall
benefits of the transformation.
• This may make it sound like not much is happening. But it does seem like a good bet that the reverberations will grow and
grow, as RPA systems get increasingly robust. As we’ve seen in prior periods where technology resulted in job loss – such as
in the Industrial Revolution – there are serious changes in politics and regulations.
• Companies really do try to avoid layoffs, since they are expensive and take a toll on the organization. But in the years
ahead, managers will probably need to find ways to navigate the changes from automation, such as finding new roles or
reskilling the workforce.
• All in all, the rise of automation has the potential for leading for a much better society. Again, workers can focus on more
interesting and engaging activities – not repetitive and mundane tasks. There will also be ongoing renewing of knowledge
and understanding. But there must be proactive efforts, say from companies and governments, to provide for a smoother
transition
1.6 RPA Compared to BPO, BPM, and BPA
1.6 RPA Compared to BPO, BPM, and BPA
1.6 RPA Compared to BPO, BPM, and BPA
1.6 RPA Compared to BPO, BPM, and BPA
1.6 RPA Compared to BPO, BPM, and BPA
1.6 RPA Compared to BPO, BPM, and BPA
1.6 RPA Compared to BPO, BPM, and BPA
1.6 RPA Compared to BPO, BPM, and BPA
1.6 RPA Compared to BPO, BPM, and BPA
1.6 RPA Compared to BPO, BPM, and BPA
1.6 RPA Compared to BPO, BPM, and BPA
1.6 RPA Compared to BPO, BPM, and BPA
1.6 RPA Compared to BPO, BPM, and BPA
1.6 RPA Compared to BPO, BPM, and BPA
1.6 RPA Compared to BPO, BPM, and BPA