Characteristics of Eco-Philosophy
Characteristics of Eco-Philosophy
Characteristics of Eco-Philosophy
Philosophy
1. Life oriented
in contrast to language-oriented philosophies.
It is argued that language-rooted philosophy
enlarges the scope of our knowledge of both
language and the world, and thereby assures
enlightenment and provides better tools for
living. It is really an article of faith, not a logical
conclusion.
Life oriented
By acting upon this allegedly superior
knowledge provided by science and
scientifically orientated philosophy, we arrive at
major ecological, social and individual
pathologies.
2. commitment
commitment to human values, to nature, to life
itself, whereas academic philosophy spells out a
commitment to objectivity, to detachment, to
facts. All forms of life are committed. Life, as an
ontological phenomenon, does not recognize
objectivity and detachment.
Commitment
Objectivity is a figment of our minds; it does
not exist in nature. It can be argued that
objectivity is a mode of assessment. If so, it is
not rooted in firm physical reality, but is only a
disposition of the human mind.
3. Spirituality
A state of mind, a state of being.
The world is experienced as if it
were evolved with grace.
The first act of awe when a human
was struck with the beauty or
wonder of nature was the first
spiritual experience. Traditional
religions embody this form of
experience.
Spirituality
All great art is an expression of
human spirituality.
Reverence, compassion, love,
adoration represent different
forms of spirituality.
Spirituality is versatile
sensitivity.
4. Comprehensiveness
Not in the sense of ability to explain everything,
but no other choice but to look at the world in a
comprehensive, connected and global way.
Ecology has a much broader frame of reference
than that of physics and chemistry.
Cosmic scale is harder to grasp.
5. The pursuit of wisdom
material growth.
Empiricism, material progress, economics of
of empirical stuff,
material progress postulates that human
fulfilment has to do with material gratification,
economics of growth is the vehicle which
secures the goods desired by material progress.
There is no justification for the economics of
growth in itself. Its only justification could be: it
fulfills the requirements of material progress.
Thus empiricism is the root, material progress
the trunk and branches, and the economics of
growth the fruit.
7. Economics of the quality of life
Eco-philosophy believes that an economics
which undermines the quality of life is in
conflict with life itself. Hazel Henderson, E.J.
Mishan, E. F. Schumacher and others have
shown the meaninglessness of an economics
geared to material growth alone.
8. Political awarenss
Eco-philosophy is politically aware. This political
commitment is not in a superficial way. It is
political in the Aristotelian sense: we are political
animals not because we crave power, but because
our actions are pregnant with political
consequences.
For example, the production of garbage is
ultimately a political act through which we,
indirectly, affect the lives of others. The equation
is simple: the more garbage we produce, the
more adversely we affect other people who are at
the supplying end.
9. Social responsibility
The social contract by which we are bound is
cooperative by its very nature. It is only an
acknowledgement of our belonging to the
larger scheme of things called the cosmos. It
is quite clear that a compassionate, symbiotic
and cooperative conception of the cosmos
implies a cooperative conception of society,
because society is one of the cells of the
cosmos in its evolution (Skolimowsky)
10. Individual responsibility
It insists that in addition to the rights we
crave, we are also bound by duties and
obligations. The point has been made by
Solzhenitsyn: 'The defence of individual rights
has reached such extremes as to make
society as a whole defenceless against certain
individuals.
Individual responsibility
Eco-philosophy suggests and insists that we
are responsible for everything. We are the
new Prometheans who have the courage to
light the fire of our imagination de novo. But
we are also aware of the enormous
responsibility that the carrying of the flaming
torch entails.
11. Tolerance of the transphysical