Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    Critical Appraisal Kel B

    Uploaded by

    AndikaChandra
    This document provides information on filtering and appraising the validity and relevance of a research article. It includes a table that rates different types of study designs from Level 1 to Level 5 based on factors like study type, sample size, and validation. The document also discusses considering how applicable the research is to one's own practice and whether it could impact patient health or change current practices.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Critical Appraisal Kel B

    Uploaded by

    AndikaChandra
    4 views9 pages
    This document provides information on filtering and appraising the validity and relevance of a research article. It includes a table that rates different types of study designs from Level 1 to Level 5 based on factors like study type, sample size, and validation. The document also discusses considering how applicable the research is to one's own practice and whether it could impact patient health or change current practices.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides information on filtering and appraising the validity and relevance of a research article. It includes a table that rates different types of study designs from Level 1 to Level 5 based on factors like study type, sample size, and validation. The document also discusses considering how applicable the research is to one's own practice and whether it could impact patient health or change current practices.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    4 views9 pages

    Critical Appraisal Kel B

    Uploaded by

    AndikaChandra
    This document provides information on filtering and appraising the validity and relevance of a research article. It includes a table that rates different types of study designs from Level 1 to Level 5 based on factors like study type, sample size, and validation. The document also discusses considering how applicable the research is to one's own practice and whether it could impact patient health or change current practices.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 9

    CRITICAL APPRAISAL

    OF THE TOPIC

    dr. Siti Aisyah 131921200001 dr. Alhan Rao 131921200005


    dr. Muhammad Hilmy Ayundra 130221200002 dr. Aji Prasetyo Utomo 132321200001
    dr. Ambara Rakhmadi Shabana 130321200002 dr. Erick Maulana Yusup 131421200003
    ARTICLE INFORMATION
    • Received fot published : 09 August 2018
    • Published in a manner online : 05 February 2019
    • DOI: doi.org/10.1038/s41698-018-0076-8
    • Cost/Support : Not there
    FILTERING FOR VALIDITY EARLY AND RELEVANCE

    1. Is the article a peer-reviewed journal ? Yes


    2. Is this research location , if valid, will be used for the
    benefit of my practice ? Yes.
    3. Whether this research is sponsored by an organization
    that may be involved in the design of the research data ?
    No.
    FILTERING FOR VALIDITY EARLY AND RELEVANCE

    4. Would this information, if true, have a direct impact on the


    health of my patients and will it be meaningful to them ?
    Yes.
    5. Whether this problem is something that is frequently
    encountered in my place of practice, and whether the
    intervention or test can be used and is available for me to
    use ? No.
    6. Would this information, if correct, lead me to change my
    current practice ? Yes.
    LEVEL 1 OF EVIDENCE
    Therapy / Prevention,
    Level Prognosis Diagnosis
    Aetiology/ Harm

    SR (with homogeneity *) of SR (with homogeneity *) of Level 1


    1a SR (with homogeneity *) of RCTs inception cohort studies; CDR † diagnostic studies; CDR † with 1b
    validated in different populations studies from different clinical centers

    Individual inception cohort study Validating ** cohort study with


    Individual RCT (with narrow
    1b Confidence Interval ‡)
    with > 80% follow-up; CDR † good †††reference standards; orCDR †
    validated in a single population tested within one clinical center

    1c All or none All or none case-series Absolute SpPins and SnNouts††


    LEVEL 2 OF EVIDENCE
    Therapy / Prevention,
    Level Prognosis Diagnosis
    Aetiology/ Harm

    SR (with homogeneity *) of
    SR (with homogeneity * ) of cohort either retrospective cohort SR (with homogeneity *) of Level> 2
    2a studies studies or untreated control diagnostic studies
    groups in RCTs

    Retrospective cohort study or Exploratory ** cohort study with


    Individual cohort study (including follow-up of untreated control good †††reference standards; CDR †
    2b low quality RCT; eg, <80% follow-up) patients in an RCT; Derivation of after derivation, or validated only on
    CDR † or validated on split- split-sample or databases
    sample only

    "Outcomes" Research; Ecological


    2c studies "Outcomes" Research
    LEVEL 3,4,5 OF EVIDENCE
    Therapy / Prevention,
    Level Prognosis Diagnosis
    Aetiology/ Harm
    SR (with homogeneity *) of case- SR (with homogeneity *) of 3b and
    3a control studies better studies

    Non-consecutive study; or without


    3b Individual Case-Control Study consistently applied reference
    standards

    Case-series (and Case-series (and


    Case-control study, poor or non-
    4 poor quality cohort and case-control poor quality prognostic cohort st
    independent reference standard
    studies§§ udies ***
    ) )

    Expert opinion without explicit Expert opinion without explicit Expert opinion without explicit critical
    critical appraisal, or based on critical appraisal, or based on
    5 physiology, bench research or "first physiology, bench research or
    appraisal, or based on physiology,
    bench research or "first principles"
    principles" "first principles"
    GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION
    A consistent level 1 studies

    B consistent level 2 or 3 studies or extrapolations from


    level 1 studies
    C level 4 studies or extrapolations from level 2 or 3
    studies
    D level 5 evidence or troublingly inconsistent or
    inconclusive studies of any level
    TERIMAKASIH

    You might also like