2.1 Classical or Traditional Grammar

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 11

Language

Description
Any ESP courses makes use of
explicit or implicit ideas about the
nature of language. These ideas are
drawn from the various language
descriptions that have been
developed by succeeding schools of
thought in Linguistics. We now
have a number of ways of
describing language available to us.
It is, therefore, important to
understand the main features of
each of these descriptions in order
to consider how they can be used
most appropriately in ESP courses.
Not all developments in Linguistics
have had pedagogic applications, of
course. In this chapter we shall give
a brief outline of the various ideas
about language that have influenced
ESP in some way. We can identify
six main stages of development.
CLASSICAL
OR
TRADITIONAL
GRAMMAR
Although language teaching
has a long history stretching
back to ancient times (Howatt,
1984), the ways of describing
language remained little
change until this century.
Descriptions of English and
other languages were based on the
grammar of the classical languages, Greek
and Latin. These descriptions were based
on an analysis of the role played by each
word in the sentence. Languages were
described in this way because the classical
languages were case-based languages
where the grammatical function of each
word in the sentence was made apparent by
the use of appropriate inflections.
Thus the form of a word
would change according to
whether it was a subject,
object, indirect object and so
on. The prestige of the old
classical languages ensured
the survival of this form of
description even after English
had lost most of its case
markers and became a largely
word-order based language.
Since ESP emerged after the classical
form of description had been largely
abandoned, its influence on ESP has
never been strong. Nevertheless, it has
continued to provide the teacher with a
useful indirect source of guidance.
Register analysis, for example, drew
heavily upon its terminology in
syllabus design As Allen and
Widdownson say:
"Teachers who wish to maintain a
balanced view of linguistics
should not overlook the fact that
traditional grammar has many
useful virtues. The traditional
handbooks provided an array of
terms and distinctions which most
of us used in learning to talk about
our own language, and which
many people continue to find
serviceable throughout their
lives."
It can also be argued that,
although cases may no longer
be apparent in modern English,
the concepts they represent
underlie any language
(Fillmore, 1968) . Thus a
knowledge of the classical
description can still deepen our
knowledge of how languages
operate.
Thank you!

You might also like