4 Panel 2
4 Panel 2
4 Panel 2
•A second point is that as a matter of historical fact, it has been biology out of all the sciences to
which architectural and design theorists have most frequently turned. Indeed it is surprising, in
view of the ubiquity of biological references and ideas in the writings of the architectural
theorists of the last hundred years, that no work of book length has so far been devoted to the
history and theory of biological analogy. The history is certainly a fragmented one, leading into
many remote corners and backwaters of the architectural literature. Nevertheless analogy with
biology is a constant and recurring theme.
(Steadman P. 2008)
Why choose a biological or nature theme?
Rationale and justification:
Out of box.
NATURE similar qualities in the well-designed
Depict nature.
Best e.g. of inspiration. Nature’s importance.
Solution for human’s problems. Awareness to common people
Responding to site
Importance or benefits:
• costs of buildings/ different in dimension. resources (except those that derive the
design process itself).
• the approach introduced here relies heavily on very specific knowledge, skills and tools
OBJECTIVES:
•EXPLORE THE POTENTIAL OF NATURE / BIOMIMICRY IN ARCHITECTURE.
•STUDY MODELING DESIGN, BY ESTABLISHING A THEORETICAL AND
METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR CASE-STUDIES.
•EXPLORE THE POSSIBILITY OF IMPLEMENTING AND CORRELATING SELECTED
BIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES WITH MORPHOGENETIC DESIGN.
•ANALYSE AND EVALUATE CASE STUDIES REPRESENTING SUCH A POSSIBILITY.
introduction:
‘From my designer’s perspective, I ask: Why can’t I design a building like a tree?
A building that makes oxygen, fixes nitrogen, sequesters carbon, distils water,
builds soil, accrues solar energy as fuel, makes complex sugars and food,
creates microclimates, changes colours with the seasons and self replicates.
This is using nature as a model and a mentor, not as an inconvenience.
It’s a delightful prospect…’
(McDonough and Braungart, 1998)
historical Origins
•ancient Greece have looked to natural organisms as offering perfect models of that harmonious
balance and proportion between the parts of a design which is synonymous with the classical
ideal of beauty.
•Architects and designers have looked to biology for inspiration since the beginnings of the
science in the early nineteenth century. They have sought not just to imitate the forms of plants
and animals, but to find methods in design analogous to the processes of growth and evolution
in nature. Biological ideas are prominent in the writings of many modern architects, of whom Le
Corbusier and Frank Lloyd Wright are just the most famous. Le Corbusier declared biology to be
“the great new word in architecture and planning”.
•Modern research in ‘biomimetics‘ (engineering analysis of organisms and their behaviour with a
view to applying the same principles in design) gives a new name and new rigour to what went
under the banner of ‘biotechnique‘ or ‘biotechnics‘ in the 1920s and 1930s.
for example The term biomimicry appeared as early as 1982 and was popularized by scientist
and author Janine Benyus in her 1997 book Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature.
•new theory in architecture and design, looking not just to understand and imitate natural
forms, but seeking insights at deeper levels into biological processes, from which designers
might derive models and methods. This activity has gathered pace over the past two decades.
One reason has been the growing environmental crisis, the rise of green and sustainable design,
and a belief that an architecture in closer harmony with nature needs to take lessons from
organic forms and systems.
ANY FORM (RESULT OF FOLLOWING PROCESS)
NATURE
OBJECTIVES :
DaimlerCrysler bionic car inspired by the box fish and tree growth patterns.
•Step 1: problem definition
•Step 2: reframe the problem
•Step 3: biological solution search
•Step 4: define the biological solution
•Step 5: principle extraction
•Step 6: principle application
(Michael Helms, Swaroop S. Vattam and Ashok
K. Goel, 2009)
•Solution-Based Approach
•Bottom-Up Approach.
•Solution-Driven Biologically Inspired Design‖.
•Step 1: biological solution identification
Here, designers start with a particular biological solution in mind.
•Step 2: define the biological solution
•Step 3: principle extraction
•Step 4: reframe the solution
In this case, reframing forces designers to think in terms of how
humans might view the usefulness of the biological function being
achieved.
•Step 5: problem search
Whereas search in the biological domain includes search through
some finite space of documented biological solutions, problem
search may include defining entirely new problems. This is much
different than the solution search step in the problem-driven
process.
•Step 6: problem definition
•Step 7: principle application
•An advantage of this approach therefore is that biology may influence humans in ways that
might be outside a predetermined design problem, resulting in previously unthought-of
technologies or systems or even approaches to design solutions. The potential for true shifts in
the way humans design and what is focused on as a solution to a problem, exists with such an
approach to biomimetic design. (Vincent et al., 2005)
•A disadvantage from a design point of view with this approach is that biological research must
be conducted and then identified as relevant to a design context. Biologists and ecologists must
therefore be able to recognise the potential of their research in the creation of novel
LEVELS OF NATURE INSPIRED ARCHITECTURE:
•Form and behaviour are intricately linked. The form of an organism affects its behaviour in the
environment, and a particular behaviour will produce different result in different environments.
Behaviour is non linear and context specific.
(Hensel M., Menges A. and Weinstock M. 2004)
LEVELS OF NATURE INSPIRED ARCHITECTURE:
Gravity Loads