Critical reading involves actively engaging with a text to understand the author's main points and argument. It is an extension of critical thinking, which includes understanding relationships between ideas, evaluating evidence, and reflecting on one's own beliefs. Effective critical readers employ various strategies such as annotating, outlining, summarizing, paraphrasing, comparing/contrasting, and evaluating arguments to deeply analyze a text. The SQ3R method provides a framework for critical reading through surveying, questioning, reading, reciting, and reviewing the material.
Critical reading involves actively engaging with a text to understand the author's main points and argument. It is an extension of critical thinking, which includes understanding relationships between ideas, evaluating evidence, and reflecting on one's own beliefs. Effective critical readers employ various strategies such as annotating, outlining, summarizing, paraphrasing, comparing/contrasting, and evaluating arguments to deeply analyze a text. The SQ3R method provides a framework for critical reading through surveying, questioning, reading, reciting, and reviewing the material.
Critical reading involves actively engaging with a text to understand the author's main points and argument. It is an extension of critical thinking, which includes understanding relationships between ideas, evaluating evidence, and reflecting on one's own beliefs. Effective critical readers employ various strategies such as annotating, outlining, summarizing, paraphrasing, comparing/contrasting, and evaluating arguments to deeply analyze a text. The SQ3R method provides a framework for critical reading through surveying, questioning, reading, reciting, and reviewing the material.
Critical reading involves actively engaging with a text to understand the author's main points and argument. It is an extension of critical thinking, which includes understanding relationships between ideas, evaluating evidence, and reflecting on one's own beliefs. Effective critical readers employ various strategies such as annotating, outlining, summarizing, paraphrasing, comparing/contrasting, and evaluating arguments to deeply analyze a text. The SQ3R method provides a framework for critical reading through surveying, questioning, reading, reciting, and reviewing the material.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 21
CRITICAL READING
as an Extension of Critical Thinking
What is critical reading? Critical reading engaging yourself in a text or any material that you are reading.
engaging yourself about what the
author or writer is trying to tell you in his or her writing
being focused on the intention or
the argument being presented in the material Critical thinking ability to think clearly and rationally
ability to understand the
relation of ideas presented Characteristics of a critical thinker: 1. Understands the relation of one idea to another
2. Determines the importance and relevance of
ideas and arguments
3. Recognizes, builds and appraises arguments
4. Identifies inconsistencies and errors in
reasoning Characteristics of a critical thinker: 5. Approaches problems in a consistent and systematic way
6. Reflects on the justification of his own
assumptions, beliefs and values CRITICAL READING STRATEGIES Annotating
Underlining or highlighting the
important ideas or points in a text like thesis statement, topic sentence, supporting details, body of the material and the conclusion. Contextual Reading
A reader studies the author of the text,
the time or period when the author wrote it and the important events that occurred during the time the text was written. Outlining
Identifying the main and supporting
ideas of the text. This strategy reveals the basic structure of the text, therefore helping the reader analyze the text better. Summarizing
Condensing or writing of a material in
the reader’s own words. Paraphrasing
Putting or writing a text in your own
words but maintaining the original information as given by the author. Comparing and Contrasting
Naming the similarities and differences
of two or more ideas or information. Evaluating an Argument S/he determines if the evidence is strong and valid. At the same time, she recognizes any weak or negative points that there are in the evidence or argument. Reflecting on Challenges to your Beliefs and Values
In this strategy, the reading materials
affect your emotions. Looking for Patterns of Opposition Some writers present opposing issues or hints and these are what a critical reader or thinker may use in his or her analysis of the text. Judging the Writer’s Credibility
You provide a series of questions to
check if the writer of the text is credible enough to get your approval of what s/he has written. Exploring the Figurative Language
Language that uses words or
expressions with a meaning different from the literal interpretation. Recognizing Emotional Manipulation
In this strategy, the reader is suspicious
and cautious when the writer uses emotionally loaded words, writes very harsh and abusive things about or against someone or something or maligns or insults another. SQ3R Method S - Survey