Modern Physics 10
Modern Physics 10
Modern Physics 10
1
Newtonian (Classical) Relativity
Assumption
It is assumed that Newton’s laws of motion must
be measured with respect to (relative to) some
reference frame.
2
Inertial Reference Frame
3
Newtonian Principle of Relativity
4
Inertial Frames K and K’
5
The Galilean Transformation
For a point P
In system K: P = (x, y, z, t)
In system K’: P = (x’, y’, z’, t’)
x P
K K’ x’-axis
x-axis
6
Conditions of the Galilean Transformation
Parallel axes
K’ has a constant relative velocity in the x-direction
with respect to K
7
The Inverse Relations
8
The Transition to Modern Relativity
9
2.1: The Need for Ether
10
Maxwell’s Equations
11
An Absolute Reference System
12
2.2: The Michelson-Morley Experiment
13
The Michelson Interferometer
14
The Michelson Interferometer
1. AC is parallel to the motion
of the Earth inducing an “ether
wind”
15
Typical interferometer fringe pattern
expected when the system is rotated by 90°
16
The Analysis
Assuming the Galilean Transformation
17
The Analysis (continued)
18
The Analysis (continued)
Thus a time difference between rotations is given by:
19
Results
Using the Earth’s orbital speed as:
V = 3 × 104 m/s
together with
ℓ1 ≈ ℓ2 = 1.2 m
21
Possible Explanations
22
The Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction
23
2.3: Einstein’s Postulates
Albert Einstein (1879–1955) was only two
years old when Michelson reported his first
null measurement for the existence of the
ether.
At the age of 16 Einstein began thinking
about the form of Maxwell’s equations in
moving inertial systems.
In 1905, at the age of 26, he published his
startling proposal about the principle of
relativity, which he believed to be
fundamental.
24
Einstein’s Two Postulates
25
Re-evaluation of Time
In Newtonian physics we previously assumed
that t = t’
Thus with “synchronized” clocks, events in K and
K’ can be considered simultaneous
26
The Problem of Simultaneity
Frank at rest is equidistant from events A and B:
A B
−1 m +1 m
0
27
The Problem of Simultaneity
Mary, moving to the right with speed v,
observes events A and B in different order:
−1 m 0 +1 m
A B
28
We thus observe…
29
Synchronization of Clocks
30
A method to synchronize…
t=0
t = d/c t = d/c
d d
31
The Lorentz Transformations
32
Lorentz Transformation Equations
33
Lorentz Transformation Equations
34
Properties of γ
Recall β = v/c < 1 for all observers.
2) Graph of β:
(note v ≠ c)
35
Derivation
Use the fixed system K and the moving system K’
At t = 0 the origins and axes of both systems are coincident with
system K’ moving to the right along the x axis.
A flashbulb goes off at the origins when t = 0.
According to postulate 2, the speed of light will be c in both
systems and the wavefronts observed in both systems must be
spherical.
K K’
36
Derivation
Spherical wavefronts in K:
37
Derivation
38
Derivation
39
Finding a Transformation for t’
40
Thus the complete Lorentz Transformation
41
Remarks
42
2.5: Time Dilation and Length Contraction
Consequences of the Lorentz Transformation:
Time Dilation:
Clocks in K’ run slow with respect to
stationary clocks in K.
Length Contraction:
Lengths in K’ are contracted with respect to
the same lengths stationary in K.
43
Time Dilation
Same location
44
Time Dilation
45
Time Dilation
Frank’s clock is at the same position in system K when the sparkler is lit in
(a) and when it goes out in (b). Mary, in the moving system K’, is beside
the sparkler at (a). Melinda then moves into the position where and when
the sparkler extinguishes at (b). Thus, Melinda, at the new position,
measures the time in system K’ when the sparkler goes out in (b).
46
According to Mary and Melinda…
Mary and Melinda measure the two times for the
sparkler to be lit and to go out in system K’ as times
t’1 and t’2 so that by the Lorentz transformation:
48
Length Contraction
49
What Frank and Mary see…
50
What Frank and Mary measure
Frank in his rest frame measures the moving length in
Mary’s frame moving with velocity.
51
Frank’s measurement
52
2.6: Addition of Velocities
53
So that…
54
The Lorentz Velocity Transformations
55
2.7: Experimental Verification
Time Dilation and Muon Decay
Figure 2.18: The number of muons detected with speeds near 0.98c is much
different (a) on top of a mountain than (b) at sea level, because of the muon’s decay.
The experimental result agrees with our time dilation equation.
56
Atomic Clock Measurement
Figure 2.20: Two airplanes took off (at different times) from Washington, D.C., where the U.S.
Naval Observatory is located. The airplanes traveled east and west around Earth as it rotated.
Atomic clocks on the airplanes were compared with similar clocks kept at the observatory to
show that the moving clocks in the airplanes ran slower.
57
2.8: Twin Paradox
The Set-up
Twins Mary and Frank at age 30 decide on two career paths: Mary
decides to become an astronaut and to leave on a trip 8 lightyears (ly)
from the Earth at a great speed and to return; Frank decides to reside
on the Earth.
The Problem
Upon Mary’s return, Frank reasons that her clocks measuring her age
must run slow. As such, she will return younger. However, Mary claims
that it is Frank who is moving and consequently his clocks must run
slow.
The Paradox
Who is younger upon Mary’s return?
58
The Resolution
59
2.9: Spacetime
When describing events in relativity, it is convenient to
represent events on a spacetime diagram.
60
Spacetime Diagram
61
Particular Worldlines
62
Worldlines and Time
63
Moving Clocks
64
The Light Cone
65
Spacetime Interval
66
Spacetime Invariants
67
Spacetime Invariants
There are three possibilities for the invariant quantity Δs2:
2) Δs2 > 0: Δx2 > c2 Δt2, and no signal can travel fast enough to
connect the two events. The events are not causally
connected and are said to have a spacelike separation.
3) Δs2 < 0: Δx2 < c2 Δt2, and the two events can be causally
connected. The interval is said to be timelike.
68
2.10: The Doppler Effect
The Doppler effect of sound in introductory physics is
represented by an increased frequency of sound as a source
such as a train (with whistle blowing) approaches a receiver (our
eardrum) and a decreased frequency as the source recedes.
69
Recall the Doppler Effect
70
The Relativistic Doppler Effect
Consider a source of light (for example, a star) and a receiver
(an astronomer) approaching one another with a relative velocity v.
71
The Relativistic Doppler Effect
72
The Relativistic Doppler Effect
Thus:
73
Source and Receiver Approaching
74
Source and Receiver Receding
75
The Relativistic Doppler Effect
76
2.11: Relativistic Momentum
77
Relativistic Momentum
Frank (fixed or stationary system) is at rest in system K holding a ball
of mass m. Mary (moving system) holds a similar ball in system K that
is moving in the x direction with velocity v with respect to system K.
78
Relativistic Momentum
If we use the definition of momentum, the
momentum of the ball thrown by Frank is
entirely in the y direction:
pFy = mu0
79
According to Mary
Mary measures the initial velocity of her own
ball to be u’Mx = 0 and u’My = −u0.
80
Relativistic Momentum
Before the collision, the momentum of Mary’s ball as measured by
Frank becomes
Before
Before (2.42)
After
After (2.43)
81
Relativistic Momentum
The conservation of linear momentum requires the
total change in momentum of the collision, ΔpF + ΔpM,
to be zero. The addition of Equations (2.40) and (2.44)
clearly does not give zero.
Linear momentum is not conserved if we use the
conventions for momentum from classical physics
even if we use the velocity transformation equations
from the special theory of relativity.
There is no problem with the x direction, but there is a
problem with the y direction along the direction the ball
is thrown in each system.
82
Relativistic Momentum
Rather than abandon the conservation of linear
momentum, let us look for a modification of the
definition of linear momentum that preserves both it
and Newton’s second law.
To do so requires reexamining mass to conclude that:
83
Relativistic Momentum
84
2.12: Relativistic Energy
Due to the new idea of relativistic mass, we
must now redefine the concepts of work and
energy.
Therefore, we modify Newton’s second law to
include our new definition of linear momentum,
and force becomes:
85
Relativistic Energy
(2.55)
86
Relativistic Energy
87
Relativistic Kinetic Energy
(2.58)
88
Relativistic Kinetic Energy
Equation (2.58) does not seem to resemble the classical result for kinetic energy, K =
½mu2. However, if it is correct, we expect it to reduce to the classical result for low
speeds. Let’s see if it does. For speeds u << c, we expand in a binomial series as
follows:
where we have neglected all terms of power (u/c)4 and greater, because u << c. This
gives the following equation for the relativistic kinetic energy at low speeds:
(2.59)
which is the expected classical result. We show both the relativistic and classical kinetic
energies in Figure 2.31. They diverge considerably above a velocity of 0.6c.
89
Relativistic and Classical Kinetic Energies
90
Total Energy and Rest Energy
We rewrite Equation (2.58) in the form
(2.63)
The term mc2 is called the rest energy and is denoted by E0.
(2.64)
This leaves the sum of the kinetic energy and rest energy to
be interpreted as the total energy of the particle. The total
energy is denoted by E and is given by
(2.65)
91
Momentum and Energy
92
Momentum and Energy (continued)
The first term on the right-hand side is just E2, and the second term is
E02. The last equation becomes
93
2.13: Computations in Modern Physics
94
Units of Work and Energy
Recall that the work done in accelerating a
charge through a potential difference is given
by W = qV.
For a proton, with the charge e = 1.602 ×
10−19 C being accelerated across a potential
difference of 1 V, the work done is
W = (1.602 × 10−19)(1 V) = 1.602 × 10−19 J
95
The Electron Volt (eV)
97
Binding Energy
The equivalence of mass and energy
becomes apparent when we study the
binding energy of systems like atoms and
nuclei that are formed from individual
particles.
98
Binding Energy
99
Electromagnetism and Relativity
Einstein was convinced that magnetic fields appeared
as electric fields observed in another inertial frame.
That conclusion is the key to electromagnetism and
relativity.
Einstein’s belief that Maxwell’s equations describe
electromagnetism in any inertial frame was the key
that led Einstein to the Lorentz transformations.
Maxwell’s assertion that all electromagnetic waves
travel at the speed of light and Einstein’s postulate that
the speed of light is invariant in all inertial frames
seem intimately connected.
100
A Conducting Wire
101
CHAPTER 15
General Relativity
102
15.1: Tenets of General Relativity
General relativity is the extension of special relativity. It
includes the effects of accelerating objects and their mass
on spacetime.
As a result, the theory is an explanation of gravity.
It is based on two concepts: (1) the principle of
equivalence, which is an extension of Einstein’s first
postulate of special relativity and (2) the curvature of
spacetime due to gravity.
103
Principle of Equivalence
The principle of equivalence
is an experiment in
noninertial reference frames.
Consider an astronaut sitting
in a confined space on a
rocket placed on Earth. The
astronaut is strapped into a
chair that is mounted on a
weighing scale that indicates
a mass M. The astronaut
drops a safety manual that
falls to the floor.
Now contrast this situation with the rocket accelerating through space. The gravitational
force of the Earth is now negligible. If the acceleration has exactly the same magnitude g
on Earth, then the weighing scale indicates the same mass M that it did on Earth, and
the safety manual still falls with the same acceleration as measured by the astronaut.
The question is: How can the astronaut tell whether the rocket is on earth or in space?
104
Inertial Mass and Gravitational Mass
Recall from Newton’s 2nd law that an object accelerates in
reaction to a force according to its inertial mass:
105
Light Deflection
Consider accelerating through a region of
space where the gravitational force is
negligible. A small window on the rocket
allows a beam of starlight to enter the
spacecraft. Since the velocity of light is finite,
there is a nonzero amount of time for the light
to shine across the opposite wall of the
spaceship.
During this time, the rocket has accelerated
upward. From the point of view of a
passenger in the rocket, the light path
appears to bend down toward the floor.
The principle of equivalence implies that an
observer on Earth watching light pass
through the window of a classroom will agree
that the light bends toward the ground.
This prediction seems surprising, however
the unification of mass and energy from the
special theory of relativity hints that the
gravitational force of the Earth could act on
the effective mass of the light beam.
106
Spacetime Curvature of Space
Light bending for the Earth observer seems to violate the premise
that the velocity of light is constant from special relativity. Light
traveling at a constant velocity implies that it travels in a straight
line.
Einstein recognized that we need to expand our definition of a
straight line.
The shortest distance between two points on a flat surface appears
different than the same distance between points on a sphere. The
path on the sphere appears curved. We shall expand our definition
of a straight line to include any minimized distance between two
points.
Thus if the spacetime near the Earth is not flat, then the straight line
path of light near the Earth will appear curved.
107
The Unification of Mass and Spacetime
Einstein mandated that the mass of the Earth creates a
dimple on the spacetime surface. In other words, the mass
changes the geometry of the spacetime.
The geometry of the spacetime then tells matter how to move.
Einstein’s famous field equations sum up this relationship as:
108
15.2: Tests of General Relativity
Bending of Light
During a solar eclipse of the sun by the moon,
most of the sun’s light is blocked on Earth,
which afforded the opportunity to view starlight
passing close to the sun in 1919. The starlight
was bent as it passed near the sun which
caused the star to appear displaced.
Einstein’s general theory predicted a deflection
of 1.75 seconds of arc, and the two
measurements found 1.98 ± 0.16 and 1.61 ±
0.40 seconds.
Since the eclipse of 1919, many experiments,
using both starlight and radio waves from
quasars, have confirmed Einstein’s predictions
about the bending of light with increasingly
good accuracy.
109
Gravitational Lensing
When light from a
distant object like a
quasar passes by a
nearby galaxy on its
way to us on Earth, the
light can be bent
multiple times as it
passes in different
directions around the
galaxy.
110
Gravitational Redshift
The second test of general relativity is the predicted frequency
change of light near a massive object.
Imagine a light pulse being emitted from the surface of the Earth to
travel vertically upward. The gravitational attraction of the Earth
cannot slow down light, but it can do work on the light pulse to lower
its energy. This is similar to a rock being thrown straight up. As it goes
up, its gravitational potential energy increases while its kinetic energy
decreases. A similar thing happens to a light pulse.
A light pulse’s energy depends on its frequency f through Planck’s
constant, E = hf. As the light pulse travels up vertically, it loses kinetic
energy and its frequency decreases. Its wavelength increases, so the
wavelengths of visible light are shifted toward the red end of the
visible spectrum.
This phenomenon is called gravitational redshift.
111
Gravitational Redshift Experiments
An experiment conducted in a tall tower measured the “blueshift”
change in frequency of a light pulse sent down the tower. The energy
gained when traveling downward a distance H is mgH. If f is the
energy frequency of light at the top and f’ is the frequency at the
bottom, energy conservation gives hf = hf ’ + mgH.
112
Gravitational Time Dilation
A very accurate experiment was done by comparing the
frequency of an atomic clock flown on a Scout D rocket to
an altitude of 10,000 km with the frequency of a similar
clock on the ground. The measurement agreed with
Einstein’s general relativity theory to within 0.02%.
113
Perihelion Shift of Mercury
The orbits of the planets are ellipses, and the point closest to the
sun in a planetary orbit is called the perihelion. It has been known
for hundreds of years that Mercury’s orbit precesses about the sun.
Accounting for the perturbations of the other planets left 43 seconds
of arc per century that was previously unexplained by classical
physics.
The curvature of spacetime explained by general relativity
accounted for the 43 seconds of arc shift in the orbit of Mercury.
114
Light Retardation
115
15.3: Gravitational Waves
When a charge accelerates, the electric field surrounding the charge
redistributes itself. This change in the electric field produces an
electromagnetic wave, which is easily detected. In much the same
way, an accelerated mass should also produce gravitational waves.
Gravitational waves carry energy and momentum, travel at the speed
of light, and are characterized by frequency and wavelength.
As gravitational waves pass through spacetime, they cause small
ripples. The stretching and shrinking is on the order of 1 part in 10 21
even due to a strong gravitational wave source.
Due to their small magnitude, gravitational waves would be difficult to
detect. Large astronomical events could create measurable
spacetime waves such as the collapse of a neutron star, a black hole
or the Big Bang.
This effect has been likened to noticing a single grain of sand added
to all the beaches of Long Island, New York.
116
Gravitational Wave Experiments
Taylor and Hulse discovered a binary system of two neutron stars
that lose energy due to gravitational waves that agrees with the
predictions of general relativity.
LIGO is a large Michelson interferometer device that uses four test
masses on two arms of the interferometer. The device will detect
changes in length of the arms due to a passing wave.
117
15.4: Black Holes
While a star is burning, the heat produced by the thermonuclear reactions
pushes out the star’s matter and balances the force of gravity. When the
star’s fuel is depleted, no heat is left to counteract the force of gravity,
which becomes dominant. The star’s mass collapses into an incredibly
dense ball that could wrap spacetime enough to not allow light to escape.
The point at the center is called a singularity.
A collapsing star greater than 3 solar masses
will distort spacetime in this way to create a
black hole.
Karl Schwarzschild determined the radius of
a black hole known as the event horizon.
118
Black Hole Detection
Since light can’t escape, they must be detected indirectly:
Severe redshifting of light.
Hawking radiation results from particle-antiparticle pairs created near the
event horizon. One member slips into the singularity as the other escapes.
Antiparticles that escape radiate as they combine with matter. Energy
expended to pair production at the event horizon decreases the total mass-
energy of the black hole.
Hawking calculated the blackbody temperature of the black hole to be:
119
Black Hole Candidates
Although a black hole has not yet been
observed, there are several plausible
candidates:
Cygnus X-1 is an x ray emitter and part of a
binary system in the Cygnus constellation. It is
roughly 7 solar masses.
The galactic center of M87 is 3 billion solar
masses.
NGC 4261 is a billion solar masses.
120
15.5: Frame Dragging
Josef Lense and Hans Thirring proposed in 1918 that a rotating body’s
gravitational force can literally drag spacetime around with it as the body
rotates. This effect, sometimes called the Lense-Thirring effect, is referred to
as frame dragging.
All celestial bodies that rotate can modify the spacetime curvature, and the
larger the gravitational force, the greater the effect.
Frame dragging was observed in 1997 by noticing fluctuating x rays from
several black hole candidates. This indicated that the object was precessing
from the spacetime dragging along with it.
The LAGEOS system of satellites uses Earth-based lasers that reflect off the
satellites. Researchers were able to detect that the plane of the satellites
shifted 2 meters per year in the direction of the Earth’s rotation in agreement
with the predictions of the theory.
Global Positioning Systems (GPS) had to utilize relativistic corrections for the
precise atomic clocks on the satellites.
121