Depth/intensive interviews involve open-ended conversations between a researcher and an informant to develop a comprehensive understanding of the informant's perspectives. They can be lengthy, like directed conversations. Depth interviews are useful when the key issues in a topic are uncertain, to gain unexpected insights, and to understand people's own language and thinking. However, they require significant time and skill to conduct, and data analysis is difficult due to variation across interviews. Preparation, establishing rapport, flexible questioning, and triangulation with other methods can strengthen depth interviews.
Depth/intensive interviews involve open-ended conversations between a researcher and an informant to develop a comprehensive understanding of the informant's perspectives. They can be lengthy, like directed conversations. Depth interviews are useful when the key issues in a topic are uncertain, to gain unexpected insights, and to understand people's own language and thinking. However, they require significant time and skill to conduct, and data analysis is difficult due to variation across interviews. Preparation, establishing rapport, flexible questioning, and triangulation with other methods can strengthen depth interviews.
Depth/intensive interviews involve open-ended conversations between a researcher and an informant to develop a comprehensive understanding of the informant's perspectives. They can be lengthy, like directed conversations. Depth interviews are useful when the key issues in a topic are uncertain, to gain unexpected insights, and to understand people's own language and thinking. However, they require significant time and skill to conduct, and data analysis is difficult due to variation across interviews. Preparation, establishing rapport, flexible questioning, and triangulation with other methods can strengthen depth interviews.
Depth/intensive interviews involve open-ended conversations between a researcher and an informant to develop a comprehensive understanding of the informant's perspectives. They can be lengthy, like directed conversations. Depth interviews are useful when the key issues in a topic are uncertain, to gain unexpected insights, and to understand people's own language and thinking. However, they require significant time and skill to conduct, and data analysis is difficult due to variation across interviews. Preparation, establishing rapport, flexible questioning, and triangulation with other methods can strengthen depth interviews.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 17
Depth/intensive interviewing
A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHOD
Depth/intensive interviews
An interview is “a conversation between a researcher
(someone who wishes to gain information about a subject) and an informant (someone who presumably has information of interest on the subject).” (Berger, Media and communication research methods) Why use depth/intensive interviewing?
Intensive interviewing is used to develop a
comprehensive picture of the respondent’s background, attitudes and actions Open-ended questions Varies from structured to unstructured
Interviews can be lengthy
Could be hours in length
Becomes similar to a directed conversation
Requires active probing of responses
Why use depth/intensive interviewing?
When you are uncertain what the most significant
issues in an area of study are, a depth interview with an expert or a typical group member can be especially valuable Few assumptions prior to gathering data Get as much information as possible from especially valuable sources Information-rich method Why use depth/intensive interviewing?
Can gain insights you had not imagined prior to the
interview Often respondents will hit you with something you had not expected Can follow the internal logic of respondent’s thinking rather than imposing one from outside Map the ways that people form their understanding of the topic Can learn the actual language, metaphors, etc. respondents use to discuss topics Why use depth/intensive interviewing?
Depth interviews allow for the development of the
greatest levels of rapport between interviewer and respondent If respondent is uncomfortable or unwilling to provide information in other formats, this may be the best way to gather that info Greatest interviewer ability to help/guide the respondent Respondents with limited language skills, uncertainty of research protocols, etc. Why use depth/intensive interviewing?
Experts/famous people, etc. may be unwilling to sit
still for traditional closed-ended questionnaire The depth interview format often suits them, allows them to demonstrate their expertise Much of what they gain from the research is that opportunity to demonstrate their knowledge Recognition of their knowledge and expertise What’s the catch?
The intensive interview demands a great deal of time and
effort It is not easily passed along to professional data collection providers Need for significant knowledge/understanding to carry out the interview Skill in interviewing is crucial Potential for bias is great Safety concerns Data analyses are difficult and time-consuming No two interviews are identical, so ‘adding up’ responses is difficult and perhaps invalid Preparing for the interview
Study the topic
Know the language used to describe the content area Know about the respondent, if possible
Plan an outline of topics to cover in an
interview Be ready to begin interviewing at any point from initial contact on Provide a compelling reason why the person should be willing to talk to you Expert respondents could tell you “I make $1,000 an hour and you are on the clock” Sampling
Random selection of informants is rare
‘Typical’ group members Experts Demanding respondents People who have had unusual experiences Select interviewees who Are knowledgeable on the subject of interest Are willing to talk Represent a range of perspectives from within a group How many interviews do I need?
Selection of new respondents should continue until
a saturation point is reached, that is, until new interviews yield little additional information Establishing and maintaining rapport
Do not violate standards of social behavior
Show respect for interviewee Do not react in a negative manner to what she/he says Demonstrate your appreciation for the time and effort the respondent provides you Assure the informant of confidentiality
Before beginning the interview, explain clearly
your purpose for asking the questions Asking questions and recording answers
Plan questions around an outline (but be flexible)
Begin with a question relating to the respondent’s experience/relationship with the topic For specific information, make questions short and to the point Don’t waste your respondent’s time To gain insight into respondent’s views, provide questions that are open platforms drawing her into the topic and letting her provide context, elucidate, etc. “Grand Tour” questions “What problems have you had with your broadband connection?” Use nondirective probes Follow-up questions should be tailored to answers Clarifications should be specific—not “What do you mean?” “When you mentioned that you had difficulty setting up your Second Life account, what were you referring to?” When a respondent is ‘on a roll’ do not try to change direction Unless the respondent is simply repeating himself/herself Data collection
Tape recorders are a good idea and usually are
ignored Make sure you are recording! Constant note-taking is a distraction However, some respondents will give away good information when the tape recorder gets turned off Triangulation
Depth interviews are often useful in concert with
other methods Combining participant observation and intensive interviewing can deepen understanding May follow up an experiment with depth interviews May call back selected survey participants to conduct depth interviews Etc. Sources used: Schutt, R. K. (2004). Investigating the Social World, (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.