Aakriti Mahajan
Aakriti Mahajan
Aakriti Mahajan
Mohandas Karamchand
Gandhi
Childhood to Assassination
(1869-1948)
Right from his early years, his sensitive mind was often stormed by various moral and
ethical questions. In his autobiography, Gandhi has put down in detail the various spiritual
and moral questions that troubled his young mind. Committed towards leading a
meaningful life right from his early years, Gandhi was disturbed by the condition of the
poor and the deprived. His studies of various religious and philosophical works also helped
him to develop a unique and individualistic view of the world, which although at its
nascent stage, would finally reach maturity in later years.
However, in the early years, there was nothing in Gandhi's life that would portend the
great things that would follow. Being married at a tender age of 13 to Kasturba Bai, Gandhi
sired four children. Gandhi left for his legal studies to London in 1891 and stayed there for
two years. Soon after his return to India, Gandhi left for South Africa for a one year
contractual legal job. The incidents there changed his life for ever, shaping and
strengthening him for the great endeavors that he would undertake in the later part of his
life.
in South Africa changed Gandhi's life for ever. Gandhi in 1893, on his
arrival at South Africa, was already well versed in various theologies and
philosophies. Ruskin, Tolstoy and Thorough, with their theories of passive
resistance, were particularly strong influences on him. He was pained by the
treatment that was meted out to the Indians in South Africa by the British
authorities. However, history has shown us that it always takes the immediacy of
some momentous incident to finally bring into light what has been latent for a long
time.
he Non-Cooperation Movement
Civil Disobedience Movement
The Quit India Movement
1920)
(1930)
(1942)
Satyagraha or passive civilian resistance and ahimsa or non
violence was the unique weapons of Indian National
Movements.
Non-Cooperation
Movement
(Aug 1920-22)
Non-Cooperation Movement
Gandhi urged the Congress to launch a Non-Cooperation Movement on three issues
* Redressal
Non-Cooperation Movement
Program & policy
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Result of Non-Cooperation
Movement
* In contradiction to the approach of non violence championed
THE SWARAJISTS
TheSwaraj Party,Swarajaya PartyorSwarajya Party, established as
theCongress-Khilafat Swarajaya Party, was a political party formed in India
in January 1923 after theGayaannual conference in December 1922 of the
National Congress, that sought greater self-government andpolitical freedom
for the Indian people from theBritish Raj. It was inspired by the concept of
Swaraj. InHindiand many otherlanguages of India,swarajmeans
"independence" or "self-rule." The main leaders were Motilal Nehru and C.R.
Das, among others.
Motilal Nehru and Chittaranjan Das thought of contesting elections to enter
the legislative council with a view to obstructing a foreign government. Many
candidates of the Swaraj Party got elected to the central legislative assembly
and provincial legislative council in the 1923 elections. In these legislatures
they strongly opposed the unjust government policies.
The establishment of fully responsible government for India, the convening of
a round table conference to resolve the problems of Indians, and the releasing
of certain political prisoners, were the resolutions in the central legislative
council.
Civil Disobedience
Movement
(1930-34)
Chauri Chaura
The Swaraj Party was formed on 9 January 1923 by Indian politicians
and members of theIndian National Congresswho had opposed
Mahatma's suspension of all civil resistance on 5 February 1922 in
response to theChauri Chaura tragedy, where policemen were killed
by a mob of protestors. Gandhi felt responsible for the killings,
reproached himself for not emphasizing non-violence more firmly, and
feared that the entireNon-Cooperation Movement could degenerate
into an orgy of violence between the British-controlled army and
police and mobs of freedom-fighters, alienating and hurting millions of
common Indians. He went on a fast-unto-death to convince all Indians
to stop civil resistance. The Congress and other nationalist groups
disavowed all activities of disobedience.
But many Indians felt that the Non-Cooperation Movement should not
have been suspended over an isolated incident of violence, and that
its astonishing success was actually close to breaking the back of
British rule in India. These people became disillusioned with Gandhi's
political judgments and instincts.
Jinnahs 14 Points
In the All parties meeting at Calcutta in December 1928,
Jinnah moved certain amendments to the Nehru Report. But
these amendments were not accepted by Congress. So Jinnah
et al refused to participate further in the conference. A few
days later, there was a Muslim All Parties conference was held
in Delhi, in which the nationalist Muslims attended and
formulated a series of demands on behalf of the Muslims of
the Country. In this All Muslim Parties conference, it was made
clear that no constitution, by whomsoever proposed or
devised, would be acceptable to the Muslims of the country,
unless it conformed with those demands. At the same time
Jinnah after consulting the Muslim leaders formulated the
Fourteen Points for safeguarding the rights and interests of
the Muslims in any future constitution of the country.
Factor leading to
Civil Disobedience Movement
* Accused of being an 'All-White Commission', the Simon Commission
was rejected by all political and social segments of the country .
* Demand for status of dominion .
* Demand for release of the political prisoners .
* Holding the suggested Round Table Conference for reflecting on
the problems regarding the constitution of the country.
Civil Disobedience
Movement
Program & policy (1930)
Garndhi-Irwin Pact
* In the March of 1930, Gandhi met with the Viceroy, Lord Irwin and signed
Result of Civil
Disobedience Movement
Civil
Disobedience Movement
DEMAND OF PAKISTAN
The All India Muslim League met in Lahore in March 1940. The League adopted a resolution that
has become known as the Lahore Resolution. March 23, the date on which this Resolution was
adopted, is celebrated in Pakistan every year. The resolution was moved in the general session
byA.K. Fazlul Huq, the chief minister of undividedBengal,and was seconded byChoudhury
Khaliquzzaman, a leader from what was United Provinces (now Uttar Pradesh). The full,
unedited text of the resolution is reproduced below.
While approving and endorsing the action taken by the Council and the Working Committee of
the All India Muslim League, as indicated in their resolutions dated the 27th of August, 17th &
18th of September and 22nd of October, 1939, and the 3rd of February, 1940 on the
constitutional issue, this session of the All India Muslim League emphatically reiterates that the
scheme of federation embodied in the Government of India Act 1935 is totally unsuited to, and
unworkable in the peculiar conditions of this country and is altogether unacceptable to Muslim
India.
It further records its emphatic view that while the declaration dated the 18th of October, 1939
made by the Viceroy on behalf of His Majesty's Government is reassuring in so far as it declares
that the policy and plan on which the Government of India Act, 1935, is based will be
reconsidered in consultation with various parties, interests and communities in India, Muslims in
India will not be satisfied unless the whole constitutional plan is reconsidered de novo and that
no revised plan would be acceptable to Muslims unless it is framed with their approval and
consent.
DEMAND OF PAKISTAN
It all started with Jinnahs declaration We shall have India divided or India destroyed.
He did both.
Jinnah was working for an armed struggle and violent attack on Hindus since July 1946. At
a press conference held at his Bombay home he openly declared his intentions of creating
Pakistan and that Muslim league waspreparing to launch a struggleand that they have
chalked a plan. He declared 16 August 1946 as Direct Action Day.
The Muslim League declared a complete strike on this day. Muslim mobs started gathering
in mosques from early morning. The League directed its workers to offer prayer for freedom
of Muslim India. Since it was a month of Ramzaan the Muslims called the struggle an
allegory of Prophet Muhammads Battle of Badr against heathenism and subsequent conquest
of Mecca. Even from early morning the Muslims started gathering in large numbers and forced
the Hindu shop owners to close their shops.
The meeting the largest ever Muslim gathering started by 4pm; more than 100,000
Muslims gathered in the meeting, many of them equipped with lathis, daggers and several
weapons. The main speakers of the meeting were HuseynShaheedSuhrawardyand
KhawajaNazimuddin. Both these leaders made speech that the government will not
interfere. This gave a direct indication to the Muslims that there will be nobody to stop them
from looting. Muslims started attacking Hindus and looting their shops just after they left the
meeting. More Muslims started coming in trucks with weapons lathis, iron bars , swords and
bottles prepared to attack Hindus and loot their shops.
INTERIM GOVERNMENT1946
On 2nd September 1946 the Interim Government of India was formed. This
temporary government was formed from the Constituent Assembly of India
(which was then newly elected).
This government was entrusted the task of helping the transition of India and
Pakistan from British rule to Independence as two separate nations. The Interim
Government was in place till 15th August 1947, when the nations of Indian and
Pakistan received Independence from colonial rule.
As the World War II ended, all political prisoners in India who had taken part in
the Quit India Movement were released by the British. The Indian National
Congress, Indias largest political party and a party which had taken part in the
freedom movement decided to participate in the elections for a Constituent
Assembly. Even the Muslim League decided to take part. The Constituent
Assemblyelections were not regarded as direct elections. The members of the
Assembly were elected from each of the provincial legislative assemblies. Owing
to this, the Indian National Congress won most of the seats, including seats in
areas with a Hindu majority. The Muslim League on the other hand won seats in
areas where there was a Muslim majority.
ATTLEES STATEMENT
The Prime Minister of Britain Clement Atlee
declared on February 20, 1947 in the House
of Commons that the British would quit
India after transferring power into the
responsible hand not later than June 1948.
The idea was that the Indians should settle
their issues before that. He also announced
the appointment of Lord Mounta batten as
Viceroy in place of Lord Wavell.
ATTLEES STATEMENT
His statement was at first unbelievable, in the context of
the previous betrayals by the British leaders.
But soon it became clear that Attlees pronouncement was
meant to undo what had been done by Clive, Wellesley,
Dalhousie, Curzon and Churchill.
3. On March 6, 1947, Attlee said in the House of Commons:
The national feeling runs right through all the Indian class
and that is why you cannot carry on against the will of the
people.
4. Partition of the country was implicit in the provision
that if the constituent assembly were not fully
representative then power would be transferred to more
than one central government.
MOUNTBATTEN PLAN
On 20 February l947, Prime Minister Atlee announced in the House
of Commons the definite intention of the British Government to
transfer power to responsible Indian hands by a date not later
than June 1948.
Thus, to effect the transference of that power Atlee decided to
send Lord Mountbatten as Viceroy to India. Lord Mountbatten
armed with vast powers became Indias Viceroy on 24 March 1947.
The partition of India and the creation of Pakistan appeared
inevitable to him.
After extensive consultation Lord Mountbatten put forth the plan
of partition of India on 3 June 1947. The Congress and the Muslim
League ultimately approved the Mountbatten Plan.
* MOUNTBATTEN PLAN
The Mountbatten Plan proposes the partition of India and the speedy
transfer of responsibility, initially in the form of Dominion Status, to
Indian Governments for the sections of a divided India.
Formally, the Plan does not lay down the partition of India, but
provides machinery for the areas affected by the Pakistan demand to
choose, either through their Legislative Assembly representatives or
through referendum, between a single Constituent Assembly in
accordance with the Cabinet Mission Plan, or a separate Constituent
Assembly for a separate State. This involves division of the Punjab
and Bengal so that the Moslem-majority areas and non-Moslem
majority areas can decide separately. In practice, on the basis of
existing representation, this means partition, including almost
certainly the partition of the Punjab and Bengal.
The position of the Princes States is left unchanged: that is, with the
ending of paramountcy they can join either grouping or proclaim their
independence and establish their separate relations with Britain.
*MOUNTBATTEN PLAN
Legislation is to be hurried through Parliament to establish the new Dominion Government or
Governments.
If the Plan goes through, the result will establish the following States or State areas in India:
(1) North West Pakistan, covering Western Punjab, Sind, and possibly the North West Frontier and
Baluchistan,
with a population of 25 millions (18 million Moslems);
(2) Note East Pakistan, covering Eastern Bengal and the Sylhet district of Assam, with a population of 44
millions (31
million Moslems). These two areas, divided by a thousand miles, would constitute the Pakistan
State or Federation, with a population of 70 millions
(3)
The Indian Union or Hindustan, covering the rest of British India, with a population of 225 millions.
(4) The Princes States, covering two-fifths of the area of India with a population of 93 millions or one
quarter, would join
one or other federation, or possibly, in the case of one or two larger States, such as Hyderabad and
Travancore, according to their present declared intentions, proclaim their separate independence.
Assuming that the Princes States all finally decide to link up with one or other grouping, then on a very
rough estimate Pakistan would represent about one quarter of India, covering mainly agricultural, feudal
and industrially -undeveloped, but strategically important territory; and the Indian Union would represent
about three-quarters of India, including the main industrial and commercial regions and urban centres,
and the most politically advanced and democratically developed sections of the population and the main
forces of the working class.
Relations of Britain with the States to be formed would finally be determined by special treaties. Military,
administrative and economic questions are left for future settlement.
INTEGRATION OF STATE
At the time ofIndian independencein 1947, India was divided into two sets of territories,
one under the control of theBritish Empire, and the other over whichthe Crownhad
suzerainty, but which were under the control of their hereditary rulers. In addition, there
were several colonial enclaves controlled by France and Portugal. The political integration
of these territories into India was a declared objective of theIndian National Congress, and
theGovernment of Indiapursued this over the next decade. Through a combination of
factors, SardarVallabhbhai PatelandV. P. Menonconvinced the rulers of the various
princely statesto accede to India. Having secured their accession, they then proceeded to,
in a step-by-step process, secure and extend the central government's authority over these
states and transform their administrations until, by 1956, there was little difference
between the territories that had been part ofBritish Indiaand those that had been part of
princely states. Simultaneously, the Government of India, through a combination of
diplomatic and military means, acquiredde factoandde jurecontrol over the remaining
colonial enclaves, which too were integrated into India.
Although this process successfully integrated the vast majority of princely states into India,
it was not as successful for a few, notably the former princely states ofJammu and Kashmir
,TripuraandManipur, where active secessionist movements exist.
*Towards Independence
* August 1946 Viceroy of India announces invitation to
THANK YOU!