ESD EXAM
ESD EXAM
ESD EXAM
86
Models, Data, Inference for Socio-Technical Systems
MIT, Spring 2007
Exam #2
Open Book, Open Notes, Individual Effort
1. (5 pts) A systems engineering textbook (Blanchard and Fabrycky) says “When the
system operating time is the Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF), the reliability is
37%.” Show that this is true for systems with constant failure rates.
2. (10 pts) The graph below is from Weibull's 1951 paper. Estimate the mean, median,
and the mode of the fatigue life. You do not need to be very precise in your estimates,
but you should explain clearly your approach and why it's valid. Discuss the
relationships among these the mean, median, and mode and what the relationships among
them imply about the distribution of the data.
a) (5 pts) z 2 + z 3
b) (5 pts) z2 + z3
2 2
z1
c) (5 pts) 0.1702 5.0223 2.3869
( z2 + z3 ) k
2 2
-0.6328 6.2121 3.4204
0.9821 4.662 4.0464
1.3432 4.5406 3.6269
-0.4473 3.8452 4.8308
2.1877 5.3442 3.257
1.9791 3.6864 4.2428
0.9132 5.658 1.174
1.4637 9.5435 2.8336
1.1773 4.3546 2.4748
4. (10 pts) Given the following commands: 0.4533 6.1233 -0.2493
1.6657 6.9879 3.1136
mu=[1 5 3]; -0.0869 2.2616 1.5618
sigma=[1 0 0; 0 2 0; 0 0 2]; 2.6525 3.3038 5.7646
0.7161 5.558 1.8655
n=15;
X = lhsnorm(mu,sigma,n)
6. (10 pts) Provide a persuasive and rigorous defense of your answer to question #5
above. The answer need not be primarily implemented with symbolic mathematics, but it
could be.
7. The computer output below represents the results from a one way (single factor)
ANOVA (α=0.05). Each row represents a different treatment condition.
e) (3 pts) What conclusion do you draw about the effect of the treatment? Briefly justify
your position.
Treatment Replicates
1 19 19 20 14 15 14
2 22 23 26 11 12 12
3 19 59 11 38 24 45
4 28 30 34 19 20 22
SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
1 6 101 16.83333 7.766667
2 6 106 17.66667 45.06667
3 6 196 32.66667 321.0667
4 6 153 25.5 36.7
ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between
Groups 996.3333 3 332.1111 3.235374 0.043995 3.098393
Within Groups 2053 20 102.65
Total 3049.333 23
8. For the experimental plan and associated data in the Table below.
b) (5 pts) Does this data strongly suggest that there are interactions among the factors?
Explain briefly.
Control Factors
Expt. A B C D response
No.
1 1 1 1 1 2.2
2 1 2 2 2 1.9
3 1 3 3 3 2.1
4 2 1 2 2 4
5 2 2 3 1 4.3
6 2 3 1 2 3.8
7 3 1 3 3 5.9
8 3 2 1 3 6.4
9 3 3 2 1 5.9
9. You run a 27 full factorial design. The response is the velocity of a paper helicopter
when it hits the ground when dropped from 9 feet. The standard deviation of the
experimental error is estimated to be 0.3 seconds since it's known the greatest
contribution to error is the response time in hitting the stopwatch.
b) (5 points) Suggest three ways to reduce the uncertainty in the main effect estimate.
10. (10 points) You run a 27 full factorial design. You have the same situation as
problem #9 above, except now it's also known that one of the helicopters was not set to
the correct factor levels. Instead, it was set to the levels for some other helicopter in the
matrix experiment. Can you still characterize the uncertainty in your main effect
estimate?
If "yes", briefly describe a procedure would you suggest to estimate the uncertainty.
If "no", explain why not and describe what you'll do next.