The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (PDFDrive)
The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (PDFDrive)
The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (PDFDrive)
Skills
Anthony Rees
Causes of
conflict
Causes of Conflict
• Different points of view
– See a situation differently
– Want different outcomes
– Different idea of what to do
• Multiple/conflicting priorities
• Personalities
• Background, culture, gender
• Changes (too many, too fast)
• Strong feelings / frustration
The Thomas‐Kilmann Conflict
Mode Instrument
A general description of
the model
Discover your conflict profile, then
seek positive outcomes through
your best conflict-handling
techniques:
– Competing
– Collaborating
– Compromising
– Avoiding
– Accommodating
The goals for using the Thomas-
Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument
are to:
Co-operativeness - the
extent to which the
individual attempts to
satisfy the other person’s
concerns
Thomas-Kilmann Conflict
Model
Assertive Competing Collaborating
Compromising
Assertive
Useful for:
•Quick action
•Unpopular decisions
•Vital issues
•Protection
Unassertive
Uncooperative Cooperative
Accommodating
• Accommodating is unassertive and
cooperative—the opposite of competing
• When accommodating, an individual neglects
their own concerns to satisfy the concerns of
the other person
• There is an element of self-sacrifice
• Accommodating might take the form of
selfless generosity or charity, obeying
another person’s order when one would
prefer not to, or yielding to another’s point of
view
Accommodating
Assertive
Useful for:
•Creating good will
•Keeping the peace
•Retreating
•Low importance
Unassertive
Uncooperative Cooperative
Avoiding
Unassertive
Uncooperative Cooperative
Collaborating
• Collaborating is both assertive and cooperative—the
opposite of avoiding
• Collaborating involves an attempt to work with the
other person to find some solution which fully satisfies
the concerns of both persons
• It means digging into an issue to identify the
underlying concerns of the two individuals and to find
an alternative which meets both sets of concerns
• Collaborating between two persons might take the
form of exploring a disagreement to learn from each
other’s insights, concluding to resolve some condition
which would otherwise have them competing for
resources, or confronting and trying to find a creative
solution to an interpersonal problem
Collaborating
Assertive
Useful for:
•Integrating solutions
•Learning
•Merging perspectives
•Gaining commitment
•Improving relationships
Unassertive
Uncooperative Cooperative
Compromising
• Compromising is intermediate in both assertiveness
and cooperativeness
• The objective is to find some expedient, mutually
acceptable solution which partially satisfies both
parties
• It falls on a middle ground between competing and
accommodating
• Compromising gives up more than competing but less
than accommodating
• Likewise, it addresses an issue more directly than
avoiding, but does not explore it in as much depth as
collaborating
• Compromising might mean splitting the difference,
exchanging concessions, or seeking a quick middle-
ground position
Compromising
Assertive
“Let’s make a deal”
Useful for:
•Moderate importance
•Time constraints
•Temporary solutions
•Equal power & strong
Unassertive commitment
Uncooperative Cooperative
How to
manage
anger
Managing anger