Ideal Closed Sels J

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 18

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/316915454

On new types of sets in ideal topological spaces

Article · January 2015

CITATIONS READS

0 746

2 authors:

Selvakumar Arumugam Saeid Jafari


SNS College of Engineering Mathematical and Physical Science Foundation 4200 Slagelse Denmark http://top…
22 PUBLICATIONS 111 CITATIONS 521 PUBLICATIONS 2,774 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Saeid Jafari on 29 September 2019.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


ON NEW TYPE OF SETS IN IDEAL TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

A. Selvakumar1 and S. Jafari2


1
Department of Mathematics
Kongunadu Arts and Science College
Coimbatore-29,
Tamilnadu, India.
E-mail : selvam [email protected]
2
College of Vestsjaelland South,
Herrestraede 11,
4200 Slagelse, Denmark.
E-mail : [email protected]

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce the notion of Ig̃α -closed sets in ideal topolog-
ical spaces and investigate some of their properties. Furthur, we introduce
the concept of mildly Ig̃α -closed sets and Ig̃α normal space.
Keywords. τ ∗ -closed set, Ig̃α -closed set and mildly Ig̃α -closed set.
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 54A05, 54D10, 54F65,
54G05.

1. INTRODUCTION and PRELIMINARIES

N. Levine [7,8] introduced the concept of generalized closed sets and semi-
closed sets in topological spaces. The concept of g̃α-closed sets were introduced
by R. Devi et al. [2]. J. Dontchev et al.[4] introduced the notion of the general-
ized closed sets in ideal topological space (i.e. I-g-closed sets) in 1999. In 2008,
Navaneethakrishnan and P. Joseph have studied some characterizations of normal
spaces via Ig open sets [10]. In this paper, we introduce the notion of Ig̃α -closed
sets in ideal topological spaces and investigate some of their properties. Further,

1
we introduce the concept of mildly Ig̃α -closed sets.

An ideal I [5] on a topological space (X, τ ) is a non-empty collection of subsets


of X satisfies

(a) A ∈ I and B ⊂ A implies B ∈ I and

(b) A ∈ I and B ∈ I implies A ∪ B ∈ I.

Given a topological space (X, τ ) with an ideal I on X and if P (X) is the set
of all subsets of X, a set operator (·)∗ : P (X) → P (X), called a local function [5]
of A with respect to τ and I is defined as follows: For A ⊂ X, A∗ (I, τ ) = {x ∈ X
:U ∩ A 6= I for every U ∈ τ (x)}, where τ (x) = {U ∈ τ : x ∈ U }. We will make use
of the basic facts about the local functions [5, Theorem 2.3] without mentioning it
explicitly. A Kuratowski closure operator cl∗ (·) for a topology τ ∗ (I, τ ), called the
τ ∗ -topology, finer than τ is defined by cl∗ (A)= A ∪ A∗ (I, τ ) [16]. When there is
no chance for confusion, we will simply write A∗ for A∗ (I, τ ) and τ ∗ for τ ∗ (I, τ ).
If I is an ideal on X, then (X, τ, I) is called ideal space. A subset A of an ideal
space (X, τ, I) is τ ∗ closed [5] if A∗ ⊂ A.

By a space, we always mean a topological space (X, τ ) with no separation


properties assumed. If A ⊂ X, cl(A) and int(A) will, respectively, denote the clo-
sure and interior of A in (X, τ ) and int∗ (A) will denote the interior of A in (X, τ ∗ ).

Definition 1.1. A subset A of a space (X, τ ) is called a

(a) semi-open set [8] if A ⊆ cl(int(A)) and a semi-closed set [8] if int(cl(A)) ⊆ A,

(b) α-open set [12] if A ⊆ int(cl(int(A))) and an α-closed set [12] if cl(int(cl(A))) ⊆
A and

(c) regular open [15] if A = int(cl(A)).

The semi-closure (resp. α-closure) of a subset A of a space (X, τ ) is the inter-


section of all semi-closed (resp. α-closed) sets that contain A and is denoted by

2
scl(A) (resp. αcl(A)).

Definition 1.2. A subset A of a topological space (X, τ ) is called

(a) a g-closed set [7] if cl(A) ⊂ U whenever A ⊂ U and U is open in (X, τ ),

(b) an αg-closed set [9] if αcl(A) ⊂ U whenever A ⊂ U and U is open in (X, τ ),

(c) a gb-closed set [18,20] if cl(A) ⊂ U whenever A ⊂ U and U is semi-open in


(X, τ ),

(d) a ∗ g-closed set [17] if cl(A) ⊆ U whenever A ⊆ U and U is gb-open in (X, τ ),

(e) a ] gs-closed set [19] if scl(A) ⊆ U whenever A ⊆ U and U is ∗ g-open in


(X, τ ) and

(f) a geα-closed set [2] if αcl(A) ⊆ U whenever A ⊆ U and U is ] gs-open set of


(X, τ ). The complement of an geα-closed set is called geα-open.
n o
The set ∩ F ⊂ X : F ⊇ A, F is geα -closed is called geα-closure of A and is
denoted by cle
g α(A).

Definition 1.3. A subset A of an ideal topological space (X, τ, I) is called

(a) an Ig closed [4] if A∗ ⊆ U whenever A ⊆ U and U is open in (X, I, τ ),

(b) an Irg closed [11] if A∗ ⊆ U whenever A ⊆ U and U is regular open in


(X, I, τ ),

(c) an Iαgg closed [13] if A∗ ⊆ U whenever A ⊆ U and U is αg-open in (X, I, τ ),

(d) an I-R closed [1] if A = cl∗ (int(A)) and

(e) a pre-I-closed [3] if cl∗ (int(A)) ⊆ A.

Lemma 1.4. [14] Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space A ⊆ X.If A ⊆ A∗ ,


then A∗ = cl(A∗ ) = cl(A) = cl∗ (A).

3
Lemma 1.5. [5] Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A, B be sub-
sets of X. Then the following properties hold:

(a) A ⊂ B implies A∗ ⊂ B ∗

(b) A∗ = cl(A∗ ) ⊂ cl(A)

(c) (A∗ )∗ ⊂ A∗

(d) (A ∪ B)∗ = A∗ ∪ B ∗

2. Properties of Ig̃α -closed sets in an ideal topological spaces

Definition 2.1. A subset A of an ideal space (X, τ, I) is said to be Ig̃α -closed set
if A∗ ⊆ U whenever A ⊆ U and U is g̃α-open set.

Theorem 2.2.

(a) Every ∗-closed set is Ig̃α -closed set.

(b) Every Iαgg -closed set is Ig̃α -closed set.

(c) Every Ig̃α -closed set is Irg -closed set.

(d) Every Ig̃α -closed set is Ig -closed set.

Proof.

(a) It is obvious.

(b) Let A ⊆ U and U is g̃α-open set and hence αg-open set. Since A is Iαgg -
closed, we have A∗ ⊆ U . Therefore A is Ig̃α -closed set.

(c) Let A ⊆ U and U is regular open set and hence g̃α-open set. Since A is
Ig̃α -closed, we have A∗ ⊆ U . Therefore A is Irg -closed set.

4
(d) Let A ⊆ U and U is open set and hence g̃α-open set. Since A is Ig̃α -closed,
we have A∗ ⊆ U . Therefore A is Ig -closed set.

The converse of the above theorems need not be true by the following examples.

Example 2.3.

(a) Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space such that X = {a, b, c}, τ =
{X, φ, {a, b}} and I = {φ}. Then {a, c} is Ig̃α -closed set but not ∗-closed.

(b) Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space such that X = {a, b, c}, τ =
{X, φ, {a}, {b, c}} and I = {φ, {c}}. Then {b} is Ig̃α -closed set but not
Iαgg -closed.

(c) Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space such that X = {a, b, c, d}, τ =
{X, φ, {a}, {b}, {a, b}} and I = {φ}. Then {c} is Irg -closed set but not
Ig̃α -closed.

(d) Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space such that X = {a, b, c}, τ =
{X, φ, {a}} and I = {φ, {a}}. Then {a, c} is Ig -closed set but not Ig̃α -closed.

Theorem 2.4. The union of two Ig̃α -closed sets are Ig̃α -closed set.
Proof. Let A and B are Ig̃α -closed sets. Let U be a Ig̃α -open set containing
A ∪ B. Since A and B are Ig̃α -closed sets, A∗ ⊆ U and B ∗ ⊆ U . We have
(A ∪ B)∗ = A∗ ∪ B ∗ , (A ∪ B)∗ ⊆ U . Therefore A ∪ B is Ig̃α -closed set.

Remark 2.5. The intersection of two Ig̃α -closed sets need not be Ig̃α -closed.
Proof. It follows from the following example.

Example 2.6. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space such that X = {a, b, c, d},
τ = {X, φ, {a}, {b}, {a, b}} and I = {φ}. Then A = {a, c} and B = {a, d} are
Ig̃α -closed set but A ∩ B = {a} is not Ig̃α -closed.

5
Theorem 2.7. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space. For every A ∈ I,
A is Ig̃α -closed.
Proof. Let A ⊆ U and U is g̃α-open set. Since A∗ = φ, A∗ ⊆ U . Therefore A is
Ig̃α -closed.

Theorem 2.8. If (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space, then A∗ is always Ig̃α -


closed for every subset A of X.
Proof. Let A∗ ⊆ U and U is g̃α-open set. Since (A∗ )∗ ⊆ A∗ , we have (A∗ )∗ ⊆ U
implies A∗ ⊆ U . Hence A∗ is Ig̃α -closed.

Theorem 2.9. If (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space, then every Ig̃α -closed,
g̃α-open set is ∗-closed set.
Proof. Since A is Ig̃α -closed and g̃α-open set. Then A∗ ⊆ A, A ⊆ A and A is
g̃α-open. Hence A is ∗-closed set.

Theorem 2.10. If (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A is a subset


of X, then the following are equivalent.

(a) A is Ig̃α -closed.

(b) cl∗ (A) ⊆ U , A ⊆ U and U is g̃α-open in X.

(c) For all x ∈ cl∗ (A), g̃αcl{x} ∩ A 6= φ.

(d) cl∗ (A) − A contains no non-empty g̃α-closed set.

(e) A∗ − A contains no non-empty g̃α-closed set.

Proof. (a) ⇒ (b) If A is Ig̃α -closed, then A∗ ⊆ U , A ⊆ U and U g̃α-open in X


and so cl∗ (A) = A ∪ A∗ ⊆ U , A ⊆ U and U is g̃α-open in X.
(b) ⇒ (c) Suppose x ∈ cl∗ (A). If g̃αcl{x} ∩ A = φ, then A ⊆ X − g̃αcl{x}. By
(b) cl∗ (A) ⊆ X − g̃α{x}, a contradiction.
(c) ⇒ (d) Suppose F ⊆ cl∗ (A) − A, F is g̃α-closed and x ∈ F . Since F ⊆ X − A

6
and F is g̃α-closed, then A ⊆ X − F and F is g̃α-closed, g̃αcl{x} ∩ A = φ. Since
x ∈ cl∗ (A), by (c) g̃αcl{x} ∩ A 6= φ. Therefore cl∗ (A) − A contains no non-empty
g̃α-closed set.
(d) ⇒ (e) Since cl∗ (A)−A = (A∪A∗ )−A = (A∪A∗ )∩Ac = (A∩Ac )∪(A∗ ∩Ac ) =
A∗ ∩ Ac = A∗ − A. Therefore A∗ − A contains no non-empty g̃α-closed set.
(e) ⇒ (a) Let A ⊆ U and U is g̃α-closed set. Therefore X − U ⊆ X − A and
A∗ ∩ (X − U ) ⊆ A∗ ∩ (X − A) = A∗ − A. Since A∗ is always closed set, so
A∗ ∩ (X − U ) is g̃α-closed set contained in A∗ − A. Therefore A∗ ∩ (X − U ) = φ
and hence A∗ ⊆ U which implies A is Ig̃α -closed.

Theorem 2.11. If (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A be an Ig̃α -closed,


then the following are equivalent.

(a) A is a ∗-closed set.

(b) cl∗ (A) − A is a g̃α-closed set.

(c) A∗ − A is a g̃α-closed set.

Proof. (a) ⇒ (b) If A ia ∗-closed, then A∗ ⊆ A and so cl∗ (A)−A = (A∪A∗ )−A =
φ. Hence cl∗ (A) − A is g̃α-closed.
(b) ⇒ (c) Since cl∗ (A)−A = (A∪A∗ )−A = (A∪A∗ )∩Ac = (A∩Ac )∪(A∗ ∩Ac ) =
A∗ ∩ Ac = A∗ − A and so A∗ − A is g̃α-closed.
(c) ⇒ (a) If A∗ − A is a g̃α-closed set and A is Ig̃α -closed set, by Theorem 2.10.
A∗ − A = φ and so A is ∗-closed.

Theorem 2.12. If (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A is a subset


of X. Then A is Ig̃α -closed if and only if A = F − N where F is ∗-closed and N
contains no non-empty g̃α-closed set.
Proof. If A is Ig̃α -closed, then by Theorem 2.10. N = A∗ − A contains no non-
empty g̃α-closed set. If F =cl∗ (A), then F is ∗-closed such that F −N = (A∪A∗ )−
(A∗ − A) = (A ∪ A∗ ) ∩ (A∗ ∩ Ac )c = (A ∪ A∗ ) ∩ (A ∪ (A∗ )c ) = A ∪ (A∗ ∩ (A∗ )c ) = A.

7
Conversely suppose A = F − N where F is ∗-closed and N contains no non-
empty g̃α-closed set. Let U be a g̃α-open set such that A ⊆ U . Then F − N ⊆ U
implies F ∩ (X − U ) ⊆ N . Now A ⊆ F and F ∗ ⊆ F then A∗ ⊆ F ∗ and
so A∗ ∩ (X − U ) ⊆ F ∗ ∩ (X − U ) ⊆ F ∩ (X − U ) ⊆ N . By hypothesis, since
A∗ ∩(X −U ) is g̃α-closed, A∗ ∩(X −U ) = φ and so A∗ ⊆ U . Hence A is Ig̃α -closed.

Theorem 2.13. If (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space. If A and B are subset


of X such that A ⊆ B ⊆ cl∗ (A) and A is Ig̃α -closed, then B is g̃α-closed.
Proof. Since A is Ig̃α -closed, the by Theorem 2.10.(d) cl∗ (A) − A contains no
non-empty g̃α-closed set. Since cl∗ (B)−B ⊆ cl∗ (A)−A and so cl∗ (B)−B contains
no non-empty g̃α-closed set. Hence B is Ig̃α -closed set.

Theorem 2.14. If (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A is a subset


of X. Then A is Ig̃α -open if and only if F ⊆ int∗ (A) whenever F is g̃α-closed and
F ⊆ A.
Proof. Suppose A is Ig̃α -open. If F is g̃α-closed and F ⊆ A, then X −A ⊆ X −F
and so cl∗ (X − A) ⊆ X − F by theorem 2.10. Therefore F ⊆ X− cl∗ (X − A) =
int∗ (A).

Conversely suppose the condition holds. Let U be a g̃α-open set such that
X − A ⊆ U . Then X − U ⊆ A and so X − U ⊆ int∗ (A) implies cl∗ (X − A) ⊆ U ,
by theorem 2.10, X − A is Ig̃α -closed. Hence A is Ig̃α -open set.

Theorem 2.15. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A is a subset


of X. If A is Ig̃α -open and int∗ (A) ⊆ B ⊆ A, then B is Ig̃α -open.
Proof. Since A is Ig̃α -open, then X − A is Ig̃α -closed. By Theorem 2.10.
cl∗ (X − A) − (X − A) contains no non-empty g̃α-closed set. Since int∗ (A) ⊆
int∗ (B) which implies cl∗ (X − B) ⊆ cl∗ (X − A) and so cl∗ (X − B) − (X − B) ⊆
cl∗ (X − A) − (X − A). Hence B is Ig̃α -open.

Theorem 2.16. If (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A is a subset

8
of X, then the following are equivalent.

(a) A is Ig̃α -closed.

(b) A ∪ (X − A∗ ) is Ig̃α -closed.

(c) A∗ − A is Ig̃α -open.

Proof. (a) ⇒ (b) Suppose A is Ig̃α -closed. If U is any g̃α-open set such that
A∪(X −A∗ ) ⊆ U , then X −U ⊆ X −(A∪(X −A∗ )) = X ∩(A∪(A∗ )c )c = A∗ ∩Ac =
A∗ − A. Since A is g̃α-closed, by Theorem 2.10(e), it follows that X − U = φ and
so X = U . Therefore A ∪ (X − A∗ ) ⊆ U which implies A ∪ (X − A∗ ) ⊆ X and so
(A ∪ (X − A∗ ))∗ ⊆ X ∗ ⊆ X = U . Hence A ∪ (X − A∗ ) is Ig̃α -closed.
(b) ⇒ (a) Suppose A ∪ (X − A∗ ) is Ig̃α -closed. If F is any g̃α-closed-set such
that F ⊆ A∗ − A, then F ⊆ A∗ and F does not contained in A which implies
(A − A∗ ) ⊆ X − F and A ⊆ X − F . Therefore A ∪ (X − A∗ ) ⊆ A ∪ (X − F ) =
X − F and X − F is g̃α-open. Since (A ∪ (X − A∗ ))∗ ⊆ X − F which implies
A∗ ∪ (X − A∗ )∗ ⊆ X − F and so A∗ ⊆ X − F which implies F ⊆ X − A∗ . Since
F ⊆ A∗ , it follows that F = φ. Hence A is Ig̃α -closed.
(b) ⇐⇒ (c) Since X − (A∗ − A) = X ∩ (A∗ ∩ Ac )c = X ∩ (A∗ c ∪ A) =
(X ∩ (A∗ )c ) ∪ (X ∩ A) = A ∪ (X − A∗ ).

Theorem 2.17. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space. Then every sub-
set X is Ig̃α -closed if and only if every g̃α-open set is ∗-closed.
Proof. Suppose every subset of X is Ig̃α -closed. If U ⊆ X is g̃α-open, then U is
Ig̃α -closed and so U ∗ ⊆ U . Hence U is ∗ -closed.

Conversely suppose that every g̃α-open set is ∗-closed. If U is g̃α-open such


that A ⊆ U ⊆ X, then A∗ ⊆ U ∗ ⊆ U and so A is Ig̃α -closed.

Theorem 2.18. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space. Then either {x}
is g̃α-closed or {x}c is Ig̃α -closed for every x ∈ X.
Proof. Suppose {x} is not g̃α-closed, then {x}c is not g̃α-open and the only g̃α-

9
open set coontaining {x}c is X and hence ({x}c )∗ ⊆ X. Thus {x}c is Ig̃α -closed.

Definition 2.19. An ideal topological space (X, τ, I),is said to be an Ig̃α normal
space if every pair of disjoint closed subsets A and B of X,there exist disjoint Ig̃α
open sets U and V such that A ⊆ U and B ⊆ V .

Theorem 2.20. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal space. Then the following are equivalent:

(i) X is Ig̃α normal.

(ii) For every closed set A and an open set V containing A there exist an Ig̃α
open set U such that A ⊂ U ⊂ cl∗ (U ) ⊂ V .

Proof.(i) ⇒ (ii) Let A be a closed set and V be an open set containing A. Then A
and X −V are disjoint closed set and so there exist disjoint Ig̃α open sets U and W
such that A ⊂ U and X − V ⊂ W . Now U ∩ W = φ implies that U ∩ int∗ (W ) = φ
which implies that U ⊂ X − int∗ (W ) = φ and so cl∗ (U ) ⊂ X − int∗ (W ). Again,
X − V ⊂ W implies that X − W ⊂ V where V is open which implies that
cl∗ (X−W ) ⊂ V and so X−int∗ (W ) ⊂ V . Thus A ⊂ U ⊂ cl∗ (U ) ⊂ X−int∗ (W ) ⊂
V . Therefore A ⊂ U ⊂ cl∗ (U ) ⊂ V , where U is Ig̃α open.
(ii) ⇒ (i) Let A and B be two disjoint closed subsets of X, by hypothesis, there
exists an Ig̃α open set U such that A ⊂ U ⊂ cl∗ (U ) ⊂ X − B. Now cl∗ (U ) ⊂ X − B
implies that B ⊂ X − cl∗ (U ). If X − cl∗ (U ) = W , then W is an Ig̃α open. Hence
U and W are the required disjoint Ig̃α open sets containing A and B respectively.
Therefore (X, τ, I) is Ig̃α normal.

3. Mildly Ig̃α -closed sets in an ideal topological spaces

Definition 3.1. A subset A of an ideal space (X, τ, I) is said to be mildly Ig̃α -


closed set if (int(A))∗ ⊆ U whenever A ⊆ U and U is g̃α-open set.

Theorem 3.2.

10
(a) Every Ig̃α -closed set is mildly Ig̃α -closed set.

(b) Every pre-I-closed set is mildly Ig̃α -closed set.

Proof.

(a) Let A ⊆ U and U is g̃α-open set. Since A is Ig̃α -closed set, A∗ ⊆ U which
implies (int(A))∗ ⊆ U . Therefore A is mildly Ig̃α -closed set.

(b) Let A ⊆ U and U is g̃α-open set. Since A is pre-I-closed set, cl∗ (int(A)) ⊆
A ⊆ U . Therefore A is mildly Ig̃α -closed set.

The converse of Theorem 3.2 need not be true by the following examples.

Example 3.3.

(a) Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space such that X = {a, b, c, d}, τ =
{X, φ, {a}, {a, b}, {a, c}, {a, b, c}} and I = {φ, {a}, {b}, {a, b}}. Then {c} is
mildly Ig̃α -closed set but not Ig̃α -closed.

(b) Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space such that X = {a, b, c, d}, τ =
{X, φ, {a}, {d}, {a, d}, {b, d}, {a, b, d}} and I = {φ}. Then {c, d} is mildly
Ig̃α -closed set but not pre∗ I-closed.

Remark 3.4. The union of two mildly Ig̃α -closed set in an ideal topological space
need not be a mildly Ig̃α -closed set.
Proof. It follows from the following example.

Example 3.5. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space such that X = {a, b, c, d},
τ = {X, φ, {a}, {a, b}, {a, c}, {a, b, c}} and I = {φ, {a}, {b}, {a, b}}. Then {a} and
{b, c} are mildly Ig̃α -closed set but their union {a, b, c} is not mildly Ig̃α -closed.

Theorem 3.6. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A is a subset


of X. The following properties are equivalent

11
(i) A is a mildly Ig̃α -closed set

(ii) cl∗ (int(A)) ⊆ U whenever A ⊆ U and U is a g̃α-open set in X.

Proof. (i)⇒(ii) Let A is a mildly Ig̃α -closed set in (X, τ, I). Suppose that A ⊆ U
and U is a g̃α-open set in X. We have (int(A))∗ ⊆ U . Since int(A) ⊆ A ⊆ U then
(int(A))∗ ∪ (int(A)) ⊆ U ⇒ cl∗ (int(A)) ⊆ U .
(ii)⇒(i) Let cl∗ (int(A)) ⊆ U whenever A ⊆ U and U is a g̃α-open set in X. Since
(int(A))∗ ∪ (int(A)) ⊆ U then (int(A))∗ ⊆ U , A ⊆ U and U is a g̃α-open set in
X. Therefore A is a mildly Ig̃α -closed set in (X, τ, I).

Theorem 3.7. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A is a subset


of X. If A is a g̃α-open set and mildly Ig̃α -closed set then pre-I closed.
Proof. Let A be a g̃α-open set and mildly Ig̃α -closed set in (X, τ, I). Then
(int(A))∗ ⊆ A, A ⊆ A, A is g̃α-open set, by Theorem 3.6., cl∗ (int(A)) ⊆ A,
A ⊆ A, A is g̃α-open set. Thus A is a pre-I closed set in (X, τ, I).

Theorem 3.8. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A is a subset


of X. If A is a mildly Ig̃α -closed set, then (intA)∗ -A contains no any nonempty
g̃α-closed set.
Proof. Let A be a mildly Ig̃α -closed set in (X, τ, I). Suppose that U is g̃α-closed
set such that U ⊆ (int(A))∗ − A. Since A is a mildly Ig̃α -closed set, X − U is
g̃α-open set and A ⊆ X − U then (int(A))∗ ⊆ X − U . We have U ⊆ X − (int(A))∗ .
Hence U ⊆ (int(A))∗ ∩ (X − (int(A))∗ ) = ∅. Thus (int(A))∗ − A contains no any
nonempty g̃α-closed set.

Theorem 3.9. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A is a subset


of U .If A is a mildly Ig̃α -closed set then cl∗ (int(A)) − A contains no any nonempty
g̃α-closed set.
Proof. Suppose U is a g̃α-closed set such that U ⊆ cl∗ (int(A)) − A by Theorem
3.8. it follows from the fact that cl∗ (int(A)) − A = (int(A))∗ ∪ (int(A)) − A.

12
Theorem 3.10. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A is a subset
of X. If A is mildly Ig̃α -closed set, then int(A) = H − K where H is I-R-closed
and K contains no any non-empty g̃α-closed set.
Proof. Let A is a mildly Ig̃α -closed set in (X, τ, I). Take K = (int(A))∗ −
A. Then by Theorem 3.8., K contains no any nonempty g̃α-closed set. Take
H =cl∗ (int(A)). Then H =cl∗ (int(H)). Moreover we have H − K =cl∗ (int(A)) −
((int(A))∗ − A) =int(A) ∪ (int(A))∗ − ((int(A))∗ − A) =int(A) ∪ (int(A))∗ ∩ (X −
((int(A))∗ − A)) =int(A)

Theorem 3.11. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space. The following prop-
erties are equivalent.

(i) A pre-I closed for each mildly Ig̃α -closed set A in (X, τ, I).

(ii) Each singleton {x} of X is a g̃α-closed set or {x} is pre-I open.

Proof. (i)⇒(ii) Let A be pre-I closed for each mildly Ig̃α -closed set A in (X, τ, I)
and x ∈ X. We have cl∗ (int(A)) ⊆ A for each mildly Ig̃α -closed set A in (X, τ, I).
Assume that {x} is not a g̃α-closed set. It follows that X is the only g̃α-open set
containing X − {x}. Then X − {x} is a mildly Ig̃α -closed set in (X, τ, I). Thus
cl∗ (int(X − {x}) ⊆ X − {x} and hence {x} ⊆ int∗ (cl({x})). Consequently {x} is
pre∗ I open.
(ii)⇒(i) Let A be a mildly Ig̃α -closed set in (X, τ, I). Let x ∈ cl∗ (int(A)). Sup-
pose that {x} is pre-I-open. We have {x} ⊆ int∗ (cl{x}). Since x ∈ cl∗ (int(A)),
then int∗ (cl{x})∩int(A) 6= ∅. It follows that (cl{x})∩int(A) 6= ∅. We have
(cl{x})∩int(A) 6= ∅ and then {x})∩int(A) 6= ∅. Hence x ∈int(A). Thus we have
x ∈ A. Suppose that {x} is a g̃α-closed set. By theorem 3.9. cl∗ (int(A)) − A does
not contain {x}. Since x ∈cl∗ (int(A)), then we have x ∈ A. Thus cl∗ (int(A)) ⊆ A
and hence A is pre-I-closed.

Theorem 3.12. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A is a subset

13
of X. Assume that A is a mildly Ig̃α -closed set. The following properties are
equivalent.

(i) A pre-I-closed.

(ii) cl∗ (int(A)) − A is a g̃α-closed set.

(iii) (int(A))∗ − A is a g̃α-closed set.

Proof. (i)⇒(ii) Let A be pre-I-closed. We have cl∗ (int(A)) ⊆ A. Then


cl∗ (int(A)) − A = ∅. Thus cl∗ (int(A)) − A is a g̃α-closed set.
(ii)⇒(i) Let cl∗ (int(A)) − A be a g̃α-closed set. Since A is a mildly Ig̃α -closed set
in (X, τ, I), then by Theroem 3.9. cl∗ (int(A)) − A = ∅. Hence cl∗ (int(A)) ⊆ A.
Thus A is pre-I-closed.
(ii)⇐⇒(iii) It follows easily from that cl∗ (int(A)) − A = (int(A))∗ − A.

Theorem 3.13. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A is a subset


of X be a mildly Ig̃α -closed set. Then A ∪ (X − (int(A))∗ ) is a mildly Ig̃α -closed
set in (X, τ, I).
Proof. Let A be a mildly Ig̃α -closed set in (X, τ, I). Suppose U is a g̃α-open set
such that A ∪ (X − (int(A))∗ ) ⊆ U . We have X − U ⊆ X − (A ∪ (X − (int(A))∗ )) =
(X − A) ∩ (int(A))∗ = (int(A))∗ − A. Since X − U is a g̃α-closed set and A is
a mildly Ig̃α -closed set, it follows from Theorem 3.8. that X − U = ∅. Hence
X = U . Thus X is the only g̃α-open set containing A ∪ (X−int(A))∗ . Hence
A ∪ (X−int(A))∗ is a mildly Ig̃α -closed set in (X, τ, I).

Theorem 3.14. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A is a subset


of X be a mildly Ig̃α -closed set. Then (int(A))∗ − A is a mildly Ig̃α -open set in
(X, τ, I).
Proof. Since X−(int(A)∗ − A) = A ∪ X−(int(A))∗ , it is follows from Theorem
3.13. that (int(A))∗ − A is a mildly Ig̃α -open set in (X, τ, I).

14
Theorem 3.15. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A is a subset
of X be a mildly Ig̃α -closed set. Then the following properties are equivalent.

(i) A is ∗-closed and open set.

(ii) A is I-R closed and open set.

(iii) A is a mildly g̃α-closed and open set.

Proof. (i)⇒ (ii) ⇒ (iii): Obvious. (iii) ⇒ (i) Since A is mildly Ig̃α -closed and
open set, then cl∗ (int(A)) ⊆ A and so A =cl∗ (int(A)). Then A is I-R closed and
hence it is ∗-closed.

Theorem 3.16. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A is a subset


of X be a mildly Ig̃α -closed set. Then the following properties are equivalent.

(i) Each subset of (X, τ, I) is a mildly Ig̃α -closed set.

(ii) A is pre-I-closed for each g̃α-open set A in X.

Proof. (i)⇒ (ii) Suppose that each subset of (Xτ, I) is a mildly Ig̃α -closed
set. Let A be a g̃α-open set. Since A is mildly Ig̃α -closed set, then we have
cl∗ (int(A)) ⊆ A. Thus A is pre-I-closed.
(ii)⇒ (i) Let A be a subset of (Xτ, I) and U be a g̃α-open set such that A ⊆ U .
We have cl∗ (int(A)) ⊆ cl∗ (int(U )) ⊆ U . Thus A is mildly Ig̃α -closed set in (X, τ, I).

Theorem 3.17. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A is a subset


of X. If A is mildly Ig̃α -closed set and A ⊆ U ⊆ cl∗ (int(A)), then U is mildly
Ig̃α -closed set.
Proof. Let U ⊆ K and K be a g̃α-open set in X. Since A ⊆ K and A is mildly
Ig̃α -closed set, then cl∗ (int(A)) ⊆ K. Since U ⊆ cl∗ (int(A)), then cl∗ (int(U )) ⊆
cl∗ (int(A)) ⊆ K. Thus cl∗ (int(U )) ⊆ K and hence U is a mildly Ig̃α -closed set.

15
Theorem 3.18. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A is a subset
of X. If A is mildly Ig̃α -closed and open set, then cl∗ (A) is a mildly Ig̃α -closed set.
Proof. Let A be mildly Ig̃α -closed and open set in (Xτ, I). We have A ⊆ cl∗ (A) =
cl∗ (int(A)). Hence by Theorem 3.17 cl∗ (A) is a mildly Ig̃α -closed set in (X, τ, I).

Theorem 3.19. Let (X, τ, I) be an ideal topological space and A is a subset


of X. If A is nowhere dense set, then A is a mildly Ig̃α -closed set.
Proof. Let A be a nowhere dense set in X. Since int(A) ⊆ int(cl(A)), then
int(A) = φ. Hence cl∗ (int(A)) = φ. Thus A is a mildly Ig̃α -closed set in (X, τ, I).

References

[1] A. Acikgoz and S. Yuksel, Some new sets and decompositions of AI−R conti-
nuity, α-I-continuity via idealization, Acto Math.Hungar., 114(1-2) (2007).

[2] R. Devi, A. Selvakumar and S. Jafari, G̃α-closed sets in topological spaces


(submitted).

[3] J. Dontchev, Idealization of Ganster-Reilly decomposition theorems,


arXiv:math/9901017, 5 Jan., (1999).

[4] J. Dontchev, M. Ganster and T. Noiri, Unified operation approach of gener-


alized closed sets via topological ideals, Math, Japonica, 49(1999), 395-401.

[5] D. Jankovic and T. R. Hamlet, New topologies from old via ideals, Amer.
monthly, 97(4)(1990), 295-310.

[6] K. Kuratowski, Topology, Vol. I, Academic press, New York, 1966.

[7] N. Levine, Generalized closed sets in topology, Rend. Circ. Math. Palermo
19(2)(1970), 89-96.

[8] N. Levine, Semi-open sets and semi-continuity in topological spaces, Amer.


Math. Monthly, 70(1963), 36-41.

16
[9] H. Maki, R. Devi and K. Balachandran, Associated topologies of generalized
α-closed sets and α-generalized closed sets, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kochi. Univ.
Ser.A Math., 15(1994), 51-63.

[10] M. Navaneethakrishnan and J. Paulraj Joseph, g-closed sets in ideal topo-


logical spaces, Acta Math, Hunger. 119(4)(2008), 365-371.

[11] M. Navaneethakrishnan and D. Sivaraj, Regular generalized closed sets in


ideal topological spaces, Ins. of Advanced Scientific Research, vol. 2 Issue 3,
(2010), 24-33.

[12] O. Njåstad, On some classes of nearly open sets, Pacific J. Math., 15(1965),
961- 970.

[13] O. Ravi, S. Tharmar, J. Antony Rex Rodrigo and M. Sangeetha, Between ∗-


closed and I-∗ g-closed sets in ideal topological spaces, International journal
of pure ansd applied Mathematics, vol 1, 2(2011), 38-51.

[14] V. Renuka Devi, D. Sivara and T. Tamizhchelvam, Codense and completely


codense ideals, Acta Math. Hungar., 108(2005), 197-205.

[15] M.H.Stone, Applications of the theory of Boolean rings to general topology,


Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 41(1937), 375-481.

[16] R. Vaidyanathaswamy, Set topology, Chelsea publishing company (1946).

[17] M. K. R. S. Veera kumar, Between g ∗ -closed sets and g-closed sets, Antartica
J. Math., 3(1)(2006), 43-65.

[18] M. K. R. S. Veera Kumar, On gb-closed sets in topological spaces, Allahabad


Math. Soc., 18(2003), 99-112.

[19] M. K. R. S. Veera kumar, ] g-semi-closed sets in topological spaces, Antartica


J. Math., 2:2(2005), 201-222.

[20] M. K. R. S. Veera Kumar, gb-locally closed sets and GLC-functions,


b Indian
J. Math., 43(2)(2001), 231-247.

17

View publication stats

You might also like