Reading

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Men and Women: No Big Difference

Studies show that one's sex has little or no bearing on personality, cognition, and leadership.

The Truth about Gender "Differences"

Mars-Venus sex differences appear to be as mythical as the Man in the Moon. A 2005
analysis of 46 meta-analyses that were conducted during the last two decades of the 20th
century underscores that men and women are basically alike in terms of personality,
cognitive ability and leadership. Psychologist Janet Shibley Hyde, PhD, of the University of
Wisconsin in Madison, discovered that males and females from childhood to adulthood are
more alike than different on most psychological variables, resulting in what she calls a
gender similarities hypothesis. Using meta-analytical techniques that revolutionized the
study of gender differences starting in the 1980s, she analyzed how prior research assessed
the impact of gender on many psychological traits and abilities, including cognitive abilities,
verbal and nonverbal communication, aggression, leadership, self-esteem, moral reasoning
and motor behaviors.

Hyde observed that across the dozens of studies, consistent with the gender similarities
hypothesis, gender differences had either no or a very small effect on most of the
psychological variables examined. Only a few main differences appeared: Compared with
women, men could throw farther, were more physically aggressive, masturbated more, and
held more positive attitudes about sex in uncommitted relationships.

Furthermore, Hyde found that gender differences seem to depend on the context in which
they were measured. In studies designed to eliminate gender norms, researchers
demonstrated that gender roles and social context strongly determined a person's actions.
For example, after participants in one experiment were told that they would not be identified
as male or female, nor did they wear any identification, none conformed to stereotypes about
their sex when given the chance to be aggressive. In fact, they did the opposite of what
would be expected - women were more aggressive and men were more passive.

Finally, Hyde's 2005 report looked into the developmental course of possible gender
differences - how any apparent gap may open or close over time. The analysis presented
evidence that gender differences fluctuate with age, growing smaller or larger at different
times in the life span. This fluctuation indicates again that any differences are not stable.

Learning Gender-Difference Myths

Media depictions of men and women as fundamentally "different" appear to perpetuate


misconceptions - despite the lack of evidence. The resulting "urban legends" of gender
difference can affect men and women at work and at home, as parents and as partners. As
an example, workplace studies show that women who go against the caring, nurturing
feminine stereotype may pay dearly for it when being hired or evaluated. And when it comes
to personal relationships, best-selling books and popular magazines often claim that women
and men don't get along because they communicate too differently. Hyde suggests instead
that men and women stop talking prematurely because they have been led to believe that
they can't change supposedly "innate" sex-based traits.
Hyde has observed that children also suffer the consequences of exaggerated claims of
gender difference -- for example, the widespread belief that boys are better than girls in
math. However, according to her meta-analysis, boys and girls perform equally well in math
until high school, at which point boys do gain a small advantage. That may not reflect biology
as much as social expectations, many psychologists believe. For example, the original Teen
Talk Barbie ™, before she was pulled from the market after consumer protest, said, "Math
class is tough."

As a result of stereotyped thinking, mathematically talented elementary-school girls may be


overlooked by parents who have lower expectations for a daughter's success in math. Hyde
cites prior research showing that parents' expectations of their children's success in math
relate strongly to the children's self-confidence and performance.

Moving Past Myth

Hyde and her colleagues hope that people use the consistent evidence that males and
females are basically alike to alleviate misunderstanding and correct unequal treatment.
Hyde is far from alone in her observation that the clear misrepresentation of sex differences,
given the lack of evidence, harms men and women of all ages. In a September 2005 press
release on her research issued by the American Psychological Association (APA), she said,
"The claims [of gender difference] can hurt women's opportunities in the workplace, dissuade
couples from trying to resolve conflict and communication problems and cause unnecessary
obstacles that hurt children and adolescents' self-esteem."

Psychologist Diane Halpern, PhD, a professor at Claremont College and past-president


(2005) of the American Psychological Association, points out that even where there are
patterns of cognitive differences between males and females, "differences are not
deficiencies." She continues, "Even when differences are found, we cannot conclude that
they are immutable because the continuous interplay of biological and environmental
influences can change the size and direction of the effects sometime in the future."

The differences that are supported by the evidence cause concern, she believes, because
they are sometimes used to support prejudicial beliefs and discriminatory actions against
girls and women. She suggests that anyone reading about gender differences consider
whether the size of the differences are large enough to be meaningful, recognize that
biological and environmental variables interact and influence one other, and remember that
the conclusions that we accept today could change in the future.

Words:

Leadership: Liderazgo.

Self esteem: Autoestima.

Dozens: Docenas.
Summary:

According to the article, the differences between men and women is a myth but that society
continues to believe, because it continues to see women as the weakest and most delicate
gender, on the other hand, men in theory are more aggressive but actually studies. They
have shown that they are very different from us in reality and this myth puts women at a
disadvantage in any field because they are already pigeonholed in a stereotype whereby in
most of the time their abilities go unnoticed since childhood.

You might also like