AT (J) 28-2013 (Final)

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 167

ATJ 28/2013

JKR 21300-0053-13

ATJ 28/2013
©2013 Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia.
KERAJAAN MALAYSIA
Hak Cipta Terpelihara.

Tidak dibenarkan mengeluarkan mana-mana bahagian artikel, ilustrasi dan


isi kandungan buku ini dalam apa jua bentuk dan dengan apa jua cara sama ada
secara elektronik, mekanikal, salinan, rakaman atau cara lain sebelum
mendapat keizinan bertulis daripada penerbit.

DESIGN CHECKLIST FOR ROAD PROJECTS


DESIGN CHECKLIST
FOR ROAD PROJECTS
Design Checklist
For Road Projects

Jabatan Kerja Raya


Cawangan Kejuruteraan Jalan & Geoteknik

Ketua Pengarah Kerja Raya


Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia
Jalan Sultan Salahuddin
50582 Kuala Lumpur
FOREWORD

There has been tremendous progress in the road design methodology and process
within JKR which are underlined in the numerous revised Technical Design Guides
produced by JKR and REAM that update the latest road design requirements in line with
the current international standards and practices worldwide. In addition, JKR Malaysia
has also implemented a new set of Contract Forms revision Year 2010 as well as a
series of new Specifications for Roadwork.

The checklist refers to them in the respective items and the designers are expected to
use and familiarise themselves with the relevant Technical Design Guides and
specifications to help them understand the requirements as stated in the checklist.

This Arahan Teknik (Jalan) 28/2013, hereinafter called ATJ 28/2013 Design Checklist
for Road Projects is organised based on an integrated design process flowchart, which
shows the various key milestones and deliverables to mark the stages of the road design
process. This document had also been presented and approved in the Mesyuarat
Jawatankuasa Pemandu Pengurusan Bil. 17/2013 on 21st August 2013.

This checklist is never intended to be exhaustive although there is always a tendency to


overload checklists when preparing them, as every individual road designer will have
their own priorities in the list of items to check.

It is essentially a collation of checklists by various functional units within JKR reflecting


their respective checking processes currently being practised when designing or
managing road design as an organisation in JKR.

This document is intended to help young engineers to familiarise themselves with the
processes and requirements by JKR when undertaking road design.

It is also useful for experienced road design engineers to update themselves in line with
the latest requirements by JKR not only in terms of technical expectations but also their
new organisational functions and processes.

This document will be reviewed and updated from time to time to cater for the changes
on policies and current requirements. In this respect any comments and feedback
regarding this document should be forwarded to Unit Standard & Spesifikasi, Cawangan
Kejuruteraan Jalan & Geoteknik.

Published by: -

Cawangan Kejuruteraan Jalan dan Geoteknik


Ibu Pejabat JKR Malaysia
Tingkat 26, Menara PJD
No. 50, Jalan Tun Razak
50400 Kuala Lumpur

i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This ATJ 28/2013 was prepared by a working committee comprised of the following
members:

Dato’. Ir. Hj. Che Noor Azeman Bin Yusoff Pn. Wan Suraya Binti Mustaffa
(Chairman)

En. Badrulhisham Bin Abdullah En. Baharudin Bin Mat Nor

Sr. Ediamin Bin Ismail Ir. Siti Norleha Binti Rasid

Ir. Amir Hamzah Bin Mustapha Ir. Edayu Binti Salleh

En. Mat Rodi Bin Junoh Ir. Mohd Shahrom Bin Ahmad Saman

En. Sufiyan Bin Zakaria En. Syaharidanisman Bin Mohd Johanis

Ir. Tuan Khusairry Bin Tuan Abdul Manaf Ir. Atikah Binti Zakaria

En. Lee Jian Huei Pn. Noorfadzilah Binti Ramlee

En. Mohd Khusairi Bin Mohd Isa En. Norman Bin Md Rabani

Ir. Hj. Husni Bin Hussain En. Samsul Nazim Bin Darus

Mejar (B) Shamsul Bahrin Bin Harun En. Lee Ting How

Special thanks and appreciation to the following proof reader:

Ir. Mohd Azahar Bin Don Cawangan Kejuruteraan Jalan & Geoteknik

Last but not least, our utmost appreciation also goes to the Y.Bhg. Ir. Dr. Mohamad Nor
Bin Omar, Director of Cawangan Kejuruteraan Jalan & Geoteknik, Jabatan Kerja Raya
Malaysia for his undivided support and cooperation given to the above committee
members for their contributions towards the successful completion of this document.

ii
DESIGN CHECKLIST FOR ROAD PROJECTS

CONTENTS

PAGE

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 Purpose of Design Review 1


1.2 Abbreviations 2

2.0 DESIGN PROCESS 4

2.0.1 Process Flow Chart 4


2.0.2 Design Phases 4

2.1 PLANNING PHASE 5

2.1.1 Project Initiation 5

a. Project Identification 5
b. Assessment of EIA Requirement 5
c. Method of Project Implementation 5

2.1.2 Conceptual Design 7

a. Desk Study 7
b. Site Reconnaissance 7
c. Data Collection 7
d. Field Studies 8
e. Data Analysis 8
f. Project Documentation 8
g. Route Selection Study 9
h. Compilation of Conceptual Design Documents 9
i. Road Safety Audit Stage 1 9
j. Conceptual Design Report 10
k. Preparation of Project Quality Plan (Q-Pan) 10
l. Land Survey Works 11
m. Land Acquisition Plan (Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act) 11

2.2 PRELIMINARY DESIGN PROCESS 12

2.2.1 Pre-Design Meeting 12


2.2.2 Preparation of D-Plan 12
2.2.3 Scope of Preliminary Design 12
2.2.4 Preliminary Design Documents 13
2.2.5 Road Safety Audit Stage 2 13
2.2.6 Value Engineering 13

iii
CONTENTS

PAGE

2.3 DETAILED DESIGN 13

2.3.1 Detailed Design Stage 1 13

a. Detailed Design Works 13


b. Road Safety Audit Stage 3 14
c. Design Verification and Design Validation 14
d. Land Acquisition Plans (Section 8 of Land Acquisition Act) 14
e. Detailed Design Proposal 14

2.3.2 Detailed Design Stage 2 15

a. Final Design Report 15


b. Tender Table Document 15
c. Engineer’s Cost estimate 15

3.0 CONCLUSION 15

4.0 APPENDIX 1 – Design Process Flowchart

iv
LIST OF CHECKLISTS

Checklist 1 : Project Initiation


Checklist 2 : Identifying Environmental Requirement
Checklist 3 : Traffic Study
Checklist 4 : Determination of Alignment Options
Checklist 5 : Conceptual Design
Checklist 5A : Geometric
Checklist 5B : Drainage
Checklist 5C : Pavement
Checklist 5D : Geotechnical
Checklist 5E : Bridge
Checklist 5F : EIA Project Screening
Checklist 5G : Electrical Works
Checklist 5H : Conceptual Design Report
Checklist 6 : Road Safety Audit Stage 1
Checklist 7A : Conceptual Stage Output
Checklist 7B : Preparation of Pre Bid Document (Design and Build)
Checklist 8 : Survey Works
Checklist 9 : Land Acquisition Section 4
Checklist 10 : Scopes of Soil Investigation Works
Checklist 11 : Preliminary Design
Checklist 11A : Geometric
Checklist 11B : Drainage
Checklist 11C : Pavement
Checklist 11D : Geotechnical
Checklist 11D-1 : Results of Soil Investigation
Checklist 11D-2 : Centreline Cuts and Embankments (for Normal Ground)
Checklist 11D-3 : Embankments over Soft Ground
Checklist 11D-4 : Retaining Structures
Checklist 11D-5 : Structure Foundation
Checklist 11D-6 : Ground Improvement
Checklist 11D-7 : Geotechnical Drawings
Checklist 11E : Bridge
Checklist 11F : EIA Reports
Checklist 11G : Electrical Works
Checklist 12 : Road Safety Audit Stage 2
Checklist 13 : Detail Design
Checklist 13A : Geometric
Checklist 13B : Drainage
Checklist 13C : Pavement
Checklist 13D : Geotechnical
Checklist 13D-1 : Results of Soil Investigation
Checklist 13D-2 : Centreline Cuts and Embankments (for Normal Ground)
Checklist 13D-3 : Embankments over Soft Ground
Checklist 13D-4 : Retaining Structures
Checklist 13D-5 : Structure Foundation

v
LIST OF CHECKLISTS

Checklist 13D-6 : Ground Improvement


Checklist 13D-7 : Geotechnical Drawings
Checklist 13E : Bridge
Checklist 13F : Environmental Project Review
Checklist 13G : Electrical Works
Checklist 14 : Road Safety Audit Stage 3
Checklist 15 : Land Acquisition Section 8
Checklist 16 : Final Design Report
Checklist 17 : Preparation of Tender Document (Conventional)
Checklist 18 : Preparation of Engineer’s Estimate

vi
1.0 INTRODUCTION

Jabatan Kerja Raya (JKR) is a premier road implementation agency, managing


over thousands of kilometer of road in Malaysia. To execute the role as an
infrastructure provider for the country, JKR is responsible for planning, designing
and implementing the project smoothly in accordance to a given set of cost, time
and quality requirement. Some design works are out-sourced to private
consulting firms while others are done internally.

1.1 Purpose of Design Review

At various stages of the design works, a design review is normally carried out by
the respective principal designer or JKR’s Head of Design Team (HODT). The
main purpose of design review is to check and ensure design deliverables
consisting of drawings, Bill of Quantities (BQ), specification, reports and other
relevant documents are satisfactory with particular reference to the following
general aspects:

a. Safety: complying with all relevant JKR Arahan Teknik and codes of
practice with respect to adequate Factor of Safety (FOS) against all
modes of failure and durability requirements.

b. Functional: adequate road and junction capacity for the designed life;
road profile above designed flood level etc.

c. Cost effectiveness: optimum cost and within budget

d. Aesthetic: all structures and road side furniture should be pleasing and
aesthetic in appearance.

e. Constructability: ease of construction; minimum temporary/abortive works;


skills and machines/plants easily available.

f. Maintainability: no problem to access for maintenance; minimum


maintenance.

g. Environmental: minimum inconvenience and hazard to road users during


construction and operation; minimum community severance and minimum
disturbance to flora and fauna.

h. Land acquisition and local access: Optimisation of land takes and access
for local community needs careful planning right from the start of the
project.

i. Legal/statutory: comply with all local bylaws and regulations set by


authorities.

j. Government and departmental policy: comply with the latest government


& department policy.

1
Due to inter-discipline design complexities that are involved at various stages of
design works, it is a necessity for JKR to have a high quality standard of design
deliverables for ensuring a project success. To ensure the above quality objective
is fully addressed and established, a design process flowchart is established to
guide designers on the right and smooth sequencing of design flows starting from
project inception to tendering process. As a tool to control and monitor the quality
of design processes, a set of design review checklists is prepared for selected
major design processes.

1.2 Abbreviations

The following abbreviation shall be used throughout this guideline:

Serial Abbreviation Description

a. KPKR Ketua Pengarah Kerja Raya

b. TKPKR Timbalan Ketua Pengarah Kerja Raya

c. PB Pengarah Berkenaan (Pengarah Cawangan Ibu


Pejabat JKR Malaysia, Pengarah JKR Negeri,
Pengarah JKR Persekutuan, Pengarah JKR
Pembangunan Persekutuan, Pengarah Unit Khas
JKR)

d. KUB Ketua Unit Berkenaan (Ketua Unit di cawangan,


Ketua Bahagian di negeri, Jurutera Daerah, Jurutera
Jajahan, Pengurus Tapak Projek)

e. HOPT Head of Project Team (Pegawai yang dilantik oleh


Pengarah Berkenaan untuk mengetuai Pasukan
Pelaksanaan projek)

f. HODT Head of Design Team (Pegawai yang dilantik oleh


Pengarah Berkenaan untuk mengetuai pasukan
Rekabentuk/Perolehan mengikut disiplin kerja yang
berkaitan dengan pelaksanaan projek)

2
Serial Abbreviation Description

g. PRB Pasukan/Pegawai rekabentuk

h. PD Pengarah Projek

i. WPD Wakil Pengarah Projek

j. PP Pegawai Penguasa

k. WPP Wakil Pegawai Penguasa

l. SST Surat Setuju Terima (Letter of Acceptance)

m. Q-Plan Project Quality Plan

n. D-Plan Design Quality Plan

o. C-Plan Construction Quality Plan

p. D&B Design and Build

q. RSA Road Safety Audit

r. EIA Environmental Impact Assessment

3
2.0 DESIGN PROCESS

2.0.1 Process Flow Chart

The overall design process is guided through a design process flowchart as


shown in APPENDIX 1. The flowchart is prepared based on the process flow for
a new road project. The flows are adopted mostly based on JKR’s “Sistem
Pengurusan Kualiti (SPK)” and other inputs from various parties involved in the
preparation of this guideline.

2.0.2 Design Phases

Generally, the design works is grouped into three main design phases and can be
organised into 18 main works processes as follows:

Serial Phase Works Major Design Processes


Processes

A1. Project 1. Project Identification and Finalisation of


Initiation Project Brief
2. Identify EIA Requirements
3. Decide on Method of Implementation
A2. 4. Perform Conceptual Design
Conceptual 5. Prepare Q-Plan and Cost Estimation
A Planning 6. Perform Survey Works
Phase 7. Prepare Design Corridor and Land
Acquisition Plan (Section 4)
8. Carry Out RSA Stage 1

B Preliminary Design 9. Perform Preliminary Design and Prepare


Phase Design Quality Plan (D-Plan)
10. Perform S.I Works
11. Carry out RSA Stage 2

C1- 12. Perform Detailed Design


Detailed 13. Carry out RSA Stage 3
Design 14. Design Verification & Validation report
Stage 1 15. Prepare Right of Way (ROW) and Land
Acquisition Plan (Section 8)

C2- 16. Prepare Final Design Report


C Detailed Detailed 17. Prepare Tender Table Document (TTD)
Design Design 18. Prepare Engineer’s Cost Estimate
Phase Stage 2

4
2.1 PLANNING PHASE

Planning phase is important because most of the major decision making process
is done during this phase. Generally, the phase is divided into two main design
processes, namely the project initiation and conceptual design.

2.1.1 Project Initiation

The design processes include project identification, assessment of EIA


requirements and decision on method of implementation.

a. Project Identification

Project identification means the identification of the need to have a road


joining from one point to another or to improve or upgrade an existing road
between two points. The following guidelines are taken into consideration
when identifying of road project:

i. Guidelines in this section are intended to help the HOPT/HODT


consider a road project in a broad context before advancing to the
specifics of road design presented in the next sections. It is
important to consider how a particular project fits into the overall
JKR’s infrastructure program objective.

ii. After receiving a list of Federal Road Projects from other


Ministries/Agencies (JKR’s client), JKR shall ensure that a project
brief has been prepared properly. A Checklist as indicated in
CHECKLIST 1 shall be used as a guide for checking the
completeness of project inception documentation.

b. Assessment of EIA Requirements

It is prudent to check the requirements of environmental aspect early in


the planning process. Should Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is
required, a considerable time and budget should be set aside to enable a
specialist to conduct the study. Refer to CHECKLIST 2 for a checklist.

c. Method of Project Implementation

i. JKR top management shall strategise the project implementation


method (Kaedah Pelaksanaan) and give instruction to the relevant
Pengarah Berkenaan (PB) for further action. PB shall appoint
HOPT to start planning the execution of a given project. HOPT
shall do the following:

5
1) Appoint HODT.

2) Identify Project team members.

3) Review Project brief.

4) Check the requirement of Value Management.

ii. HOPT/HODT shall analyse the following documents in order to


make final recommendation on the type of project implementation
method:

1) Customer’s Project brief.

2) Customer’s Asset Verification.

3) Resource allocation.

4) Review EIA requirements.

iii. The output of the above process shall decide on the final project
implementations method which consist of as following options;

1) Conventional:

a) Design out-sourced to consulting firm.

b) Design internally by JKR’s Design Department


(HODT)

2) Design and Build:

a) Based on tender.

b) Based on direct negotiation

iv. For a conventional method whereby the design part shall be


undertaken by a consulting firm, HOPT shall appoint the consultant
based on the procedure as stipulated in Procedure JKR.PK(P).10.

v. As for Design & Build (D&B) contractor upon receiving approval


from Treasury, HOPT shall issue Letter of Intention/Surat Niat
(LOI) to the successful D&B contractor. The consultant firms for the
D&B team have to be vetted through to screen the capability of
each of the design firm.

vi. HOPT/HODT shall prepare a ‘Project Need Statement’ for D&B


projects.

6
2.1.2 Conceptual Design

After the project has been planned and programmed for implementation, it moves
into the Conceptual Design stage. In this stage, JKR commits its resources by
performing design works. Should JKR decide to out-source this function to
private consultancy firm, a selection and appointment of the consultant shall take
place. The Conceptual Design stage generally constitutes the following:

a. Desk Study

Before embarking on data collection activities, designers shall:

i. Review the existing data available in the Local Authorities or


through other sources/agencies. This data may include previous
documentation (reports, plans, files, surveys etc.).

ii. Review on road asset inventory such as utilities, drainage,


structures or adjacent developments.

iii. Topographical and geology maps.

iv. Land acquisition cost data.

v. Local sources of material (quarry products, source of sand, etc.)

b. Site Reconnaissance

Site reconnaissance study should be carried out as early as possible to


make an appreciation of the existing site condition. The team shall study
on the scope and issues pertaining to the initial work that needs to be
done including the study area, logistics to gauge the resources required to
undertake the conceptual design works and other subsequent design
works.

c. Data Collection

Data will be collected on a wide range of existing infrastructure facilities


and services within the project site. The designer shall collect, review,
organise, document, interpret, assess and evaluate of appropriate data
that shall include, but not be limited to:

i. Past and present studies related to the Project(s) (Roads, junction,


signals, pavements, poles, lightings, buildings, excavation and fill
of soil or sands and any structures etc).

ii. Information regarding new projects connecting or close to the


project area.

7
iii. Present traffic volume data and patterns and travel demand
characteristics.

iv. Road accident data collection.

v. Engineering data including information on existing and planned


utilities (cables, pipes, ducts, etc) at Project’s site.

vi. Hydrological data, existing drainage/sanitary network and future


plan for drainage and storm water.

vii. Natural environmental and meteorological data, water quality &


wastewater treatment and water treatment plant, wild life,
vegetation, hazard lands, etc.

viii. Existing topographical data and geological data.

ix. Property boundaries based on revenue sheets.

Besides collecting data for road networks, data will also be collected on
potential constraints to development, including flood risk zones, religious
sites, archaeological and conservation areas.

d. Field Studies

The next level is to undertake field works as early as possible for the
following studies:

i. Traffic Study (Refer to CHECKLIST 3)

ii. Environmental Impact

e. Data Analysis

From the data collected, desk studies carried out and result of field
surveys, the designers shall analyse the information and propose possible
options for consideration, as part of the road alignment study.

f. Project Documentation

The designers shall prepare, for distribution, minutes of Project Team


meetings and correspondence with the local authorities, utility authorities
and other interest groups and document the study for reference during
future design stages including the photographic records of current
conditions.

8
g. Route Selection Study

i. The objective of this exercise is to present feasible and technical


alternative solutions with comments on advantages and
disadvantages of each alternative. Based on the detail desk
studies and examination of relevant topographical maps, revenue
sheets, geological maps, etc., the designers shall develop selected
alignment options in sufficient detail for comparison purposes.

ii. The designers shall make a comparison matrix between the


possible alignment options. The criteria of the study shall be based
on geometrics, estimated construction cost, construction time,
encumbrances, land acquisition, impact on environment, etc.
A preferred option shall be established at this point. A comparison
matrix is used to evaluate the preferred option of the proposed
alignments.

iii. CHECKLIST 4 shall be used to check the completeness of route


selection study.

h. Compilation of Conceptual Design Documents. Refer to


CHECKLIST 5

i. Documents that are required to be submitted to the client are as


follows:

ii. Inception Report

iii. Traffic Study Report (if required) or Traffic Count Report

iv. Alignment Option Study

v. Scope of Survey works

vi. Scope of S.I works

i. Road Safety Audit Stage 1

Road Safety Audit (RSA) Stage 1 shall be carried out by a qualified Road
Safety Auditor. Engineers shall make necessary adjustments to the
preferred alignment based on the comments from RSA. Refer to
CHECKLIST 6.

9
j. Conceptual Design Report. Refer to CHECKLIST 7A

For the preferred alignment, the designers shall prepare a conceptual


design report and drawings based on JKR Arahan Teknik Jalan. The
report shall include:

i. Road plan and profile.

ii. Typical road cross-sections.

iii. Major junction schematics.

iv. Drainage catchments.

v. Bridges & major culverts location and schematics.

vi. Pavement thickness design.

vii. Basic R.O.W Plan as a corridor planning.

viii. Geological study

The designers shall also prepare a preliminary project cost estimate and
preliminary construction schedule.

Refer to CHECKLIST 7B for a checklist of Design and Build Tender.

k. Preparation of Project Quality Plan (Q-Pan)

i. HOPT shall prepare a project Quality Plan at this stage. For a


D&B project, the contractor shall prepare the same. Before the
project can proceed further, a review on the client’s requirements
shall be done to check the adequacy of documents being
produced. Any errors or changes shall be rectified prior to final
approval from PB.

ii. All relevant information would be uploaded into SKALA system and
the Q-Pan shall be distributed to the relevant parties including the
client.

iii. Survey works shall commence immediately after the appointment


of accredited/licensed land surveyor and the design corridor plan
(Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act 1960) shall be issued to
JKPTG/Land Office as soon as possible.

10
l. Land Survey Works

This process will involve the appointment of Land Surveyor. Refer to


CHECKLIST 8

i. Scope of Works

It is very important to ensure the scope of survey works is fully


addressed to ensure the sufficiency of survey data. The scope may
include the following:

1) Strip Survey.

2) Site Survey for bridge, junction/interchange and river areas.

3) Marking of BH locations.

4) ROW setting out.

5) Utility mapping

ii. Budget For Survey Works

In many instances, the budget for survey works is very limited and
this has imposed problems later during the detailed design stage
where a slight shift in alignment could provide substantial savings
but this is not possible due to lack of survey data. The designers
shall properly plan the survey corridor and its cost should be
properly estimated. Before a land surveyor could be appointed,
Cadangan Teknikal & Kewangan (CTK) should be agreed and
approved by the relevant parties.

iii. Survey Data

Most Licensed Surveyors have been trained to produce survey


data as per JKR’s survey Terms of Reference since JKR has
started to use digital data in the late 1980’s. The format requires
representing the ground features in the form of ‘digital strings’.
Should the alignment traverses into more than 2 states whereby
the coordinate origin differs, use of integration coordinate system is
vital. The designer is to ensure that coordinate systems are
properly integrated.

m. Land Acquisition Plan (Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act)

The preferred alignment is overlaid on to the revenue sheet to determine


the lots affected by the proposed alignment. At this stage, the assessment
is made more to quantify the number of lots and area of land to be
identified as the proposed road corridor area under Section 4 of the Land
Acquisition Act 1960. Refer to CHECKLIST 9.

11
2.2 PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE

2.2.1 Pre-Design Meeting

HOPT/HODT shall arrange for a meeting to start with the preliminary design
phase. Based on conceptual design proposal, project cost estimate, project brief
and Q-Plan, the designer shall start the design process immediately.

2.2.2 Preparation of a D-Plan.

D-Plan should be prepared as soon as possible after conducting the pre-design


meeting.

2.2.3 Scope of Preliminary Design

Preliminary Design entails producing the basic layout of the road alignment using
the detailed ground survey as the base data. During the preliminary design,
designer should take into the consideration of:

a. The horizontal and vertical alignments are tweaked to take into account
the geometric requirements making sure they fulfil or exceed the minimum
standards as specified. Main geometric emphasis shall be on the turning
radius, sight distances and overtaking opportunities within the overall
project.

b. The earthworks shall be computed and the mass haul diagram produced
to analyse the overall economics of the road profile.

c. A basic layout of the various junctions or interchanges are produced to


outline the concept of the road and to see whether they needs further
refinement.

d. The general layouts of the bridges are produced to check if they fit into the
scheme and detailed hydraulics analysis are performed to confirm all the
previous assumptions made. The same is done for the major culverts. For
railway crossings and other road crossings, reference shall be made to
KTM and JKR for their review and approvals.

e. Based on the above plans, the SI location plan shall then be prepared.
The scope for the SI works shall be prepared and tender document
produced for tender exercise. Location of BH and other investigation
requirements shall be marked and its coordinate indicated on the
drawings. Refer to CHECKLIST 10.

12
2.2.4 Preliminary Design Documents

Preliminary Design Documents shall be compiled and submitted for approval.


Refer CHECKLIST 11.

2.2.5 Road Safety Audit Stage 2

At this point the Road Safety Auditor shall undertake RSA Stage 2
(Refer to CHECKLIST 12) of his work to see if the schemes work out and
whether there are major issues related to safety point of view.

2.2.6 Value Engineering

Any major issues discovered until now shall be deliberated and if need be, small
sections of the alignment may need extra surveys and redesign to get an
optimised scheme. Value engineering may be performed to further enhance the
decisions made during this stage.

2.3 DETAILED DESIGN PHASE

Detailed design phase is divided into two stages. Stage 1 includes the
preparation of detailed design drawings and design calculations whereas stage 2
consists of final design reports and tender documentation including project
construction cost estimate.

2.3.1 Detailed Design Stage 1

This process is a continuation of the preliminary design phase. At this stage, the
following tasks shall be done before tender documents could be finalised.

a. Detailed Design Works

i. At this stage, soil investigation work should have been completed


and the initial result (BH Log) shall be furnished by the S.I
contractor. The designers shall start designing the geotechnical
aspects as soon possible on getting the initial results from the soil
investigation works. Adjustments to the vertical profile may be
done to reduce embankment heights or increase them to reduce
cuts should the initial soil results show the need to do so.

ii. As soon as the plan and profile and road cross-sections have been
finalised, other disciplines shall start working on the details of other
road design elements such as drainage, geotechnical, structures,
road marking and furniture’s, Environmental Monitoring Plan

13
(EMP), Traffic Management Plan, street lighting and other road
features as required by the client. Design work shall also include
schemes for temporary diversion and work zones according to the
anticipated stages of the construction works.

iii. The next major effort in this last stage of the design is a massive
task of producing all the relevant drawings as a main part of the
tender documents. From these drawings, quantities are measured
and documented in Taking-Off Sheets and its quantities transferred
into the Bill of Quantities (BQ).

iv. CHECKLIST 13 shows the overall checklist for detailed design


stage. It is a combined checklist with various inputs from the
geometric, drainage, geotechnical up to street lighting design
components.

b. Road Safety Audit Stage 3

Road Safety Auditor shall undertake RSA Stage 3 and the designer shall
refine the detailed design according to the comments as the need arise.
The RSA shall include the landscaping works that may affect line of sight
at junctions. Please refer to CHECKLIST 14.

c. Design Verification and Design Validation

This is a process where JKR would gather all project stakeholders


(if required) to verify the design as per client requirements. Should design
validation is required, the process also takes place at this stage.

d. Land Acquisition Plans (Section 8 of Land Acquisition Act)

The plans are prepared for submission once the above processes have
been completed. By this stage, the designers should be able to optimise
land areas that need to be acquired. Refer to CHECKLIST 15.

e. Detailed Design Proposal

The following documents shall be forwarded to JKR for approval:

i. Detailed Design Calculation.

ii. Detailed Drawings.

iii. Specifications.

iv. Bill of quantities

v. Taking off sheets

14
2.3.2 Detailed Design Stage 2

Final design report, cost estimate and tender table document shall be prepared
during this stage. For checking these works, the following checklists have been
prepared:

a. Final Design Report - CHECKLIST 16

b. Tender Table Document - CHECKLIST 17

c. Engineer’s Cost estimate - CHECKLIST 18

3.0 CONCLUSION

Using the checklists is not an end in itself. Rather, the checklists are starting
points from which to explore solutions to design a road project of the highest
standard. Designers are encouraged to improve the checklist from time to time for
a better design solution and to facilitate first-time road designers, especially in
carrying out road design works assigned to them.

15
DESIGN PROCESS FLOW CHART APPENDIX 1

Checklist No 1 Checklist No 2 SPK 6.1 PROSES KERJA PERANCANGAN PELAKSANAAN PROJEK


A1-1 : Pejabat KPKR / TKPKR A1-2 : Pejabat KPKR / TKPKR A1-3 : Pejabat PB A1-4 : Pejabat HOPT A1-6 : Pejabat PB A1-9 : HOPT/HODT A1-10 : HOPT
A1-5 : HOPT/HODT
Kenalpasti Projek 1. Bincang dengan KPKR/TKPKR (Jika Berkenaan)
1. Terima Arahan 1. Semak Brif Projek. 1. Analisa Brif Projek. 2. Dapatkan Keputusan Kaedah Pelaksanaan
1. Kenalpasti Skop Projek 1. Kendali Taklimat Skop
Rancang Strategi Pelaksanaan. Borang JKR.PK(O).01-1
Kerja & Arahan
A1 - INPUT:
Pelaksanaan
2. Lantik HOPT
2. Kenalpasti Pasukan
2. Verifikasi Harta Pelanggan (Jika
Konvensional (Dalaman) 2. Sedia 'Need Statement' Pelaksanaan Kepada
& Arah PB ambil Tindakan Projek (bagi projek R&B) Semua HODT terlibat
PROSES KERJA Berkaitan). Borang JKR.PK(O).01-2 A1-7 : Pejabat HOPT
1. Senarai Project Persekutuan 3. Lantik HODT dengan Konvensional (Perunding) 1. Lantik Perunding
PROJEK daripada Kementerian / Jabatan persetujuan PB 3. Analisa Sumber Prosedur JKR.PK(P).10
Pelanggan (Rujuk SPK Perenggan 6.1.1)
INITIATION INPUT:
4. Semak Keperluan Reka & Bina R&B (Tender)
INPUT:
1. Brif Projek 1. Brif Projek
VM 4. Laporkan Hasil kepada PB 2. Pelan Lokasi Tapak
A1-8 : Pejabat HOPT
3. Siasatan tapak
5. Semak Keperluan EIA dalam Reka & Bina R&B (Rundingan Terus) 1. Keluar Surat Niat
(Site Visit - jika perlu)
Perancangan Projek 2. Semak Kelayakan Perunding

SPK 6.1.2 PROSES KERJA PENYEDIAAN


Konsep REKABENTUK KONSEP - DILAKSANAKAN JURUPERUNDING/UNIT R EKABENTUK JKR
Checklist No 7A Conceptual Stage Output PROSES
Checklist No 3 Checklist No 4 Checklist No 5 Checklist No 6
A- Checklist 7B Design & Build Tender TENDER
A2-1 : Laksana Desk Study A2-2 : Analisa Trafik & A-2-3 : Kenalpasti A2-4 : Lawatan Tapak A2-5 : Kenalpasti
PROSES KERJA Kesan Alam Sekitar Rujuk Borang JKR.PK(O).01-3 Jajaran A2-8 : Output Peringkat Konsep
REKA & BINA
A2-7 :
A2-6 : Rekabentuk
PERANCANGAN 1. Road category
2. Design standard
1. Road category
Kaji Penemuan Konsep Road Safety Adakah 1. Inception Report
2. Design standard INPUT: Audit (RSA) Stage 1 Rekabentuk Konsep Ya
3. Level of Service INPUT: 2. Conceptual Design Report
3. Level of Service 1. Report from Specialist OUTPUT: Memenuhi RSA
1. Data Collection / 3. Feasibility Report (If Applicable)
2. State UPEN 1. Conceptual Stage 1/EIA?
2. HPU Traffic Cencus report
Design Report
EIA Requirements 4. Scope for Survey Works
3. Feedbacks from DOE 5. Scope for SI Works
Tidak 6. Penyediaan Kos Awalan (PDA)

A2 -
PROSES KERJA
REKABENTUK
KONSEP
SPK 6.1.3 PROSES KERJA PENYEDIAAN PELAN KUALITI PROJEK
A2-9 : HOPT/HODT A2-10 : HOPT/HODT A2-11 : HOPT/HODT A2-12 : HOPT A2-13 : HOPT/HODT A2-14 : PB Checklist No 8
SAHKAN: A2-15 :
Sediakan pelan Kualiti (Q-Plan) 1. Brif Projek
Rujuk SPK Perenggan 6.1.3 Kendali Mesyuarat Kajian Semula Laksanakan Kerja Ukur
2. Rekabentuk Konsep
Keperluan Pelanggan
3. Q-Plan
Kajisemula 4. Kos Awalan
Rekabentuk Konsep Penyediaan Laksana Pindaan Di
INPUT: Mana Perlu Mengikut
Kos Awalan 1. Maklumat Asas INPUT: Keputusan Mesyuarat PASTIKAN: Checklist No 9
Rujuk Borang JKR.PK(O).01-5 2. Skop Projek 1. Brif Projek Pelanggan
3. Analisa Sumber 2. Konsep Projek
4. Anggaran Tempoh pelaksanaan 1. Maklumat di daftarkan di dalam SKALA A2-16 : Penyediaan Pelan ROW
5. Pelan Kualiti Kontraktor 3. Rekabentuk Konsep 2. Q-Plan diedarkan kepada Pelanggan
(R&B Rundingan Terus) 4. Anggaran Kasar Kos Projek Penyediaan Pelan PBT Sek 4

B-8 : Semak /Kajian Semula


Rekabentuk Awalan
DILAKSANAKAN OLEH JURUPERUNDING/JKR
B-1 : HOPT/HODT B-2 : Kenal pasti cara Pembinaan Checklist No 12
Kendali Mesyuarat & keperluan kefungsian Checklist No 10 Checklist No 11 Tidak B-12 : HOPT/HODT
B-11 : HOPT/HODT
B- Pra-Rekabentuk
B-9 :
B-3 : B-5 : Kenal pasti B-7 : Adakah B-10 : Dapatkan
PROSES KERJA INPUT:
1. ATJ Rekabentuk Awalan Sistem / Ciri
B-6 :
Dapat kelulusan Rekabentuk
Ya Road safety
Pindaan
Kendali Mesyuarat
Persetujuan
INPUT: B-4 : Sedia Audit (RSA) Penyelarasan
REKABENTUK 2. Piawaian/Spesifikasi Geometric & Penyediaan
Kerja S.I
Rekabentuk & Kenal
Rekabentuk
Rekabentuk dari pihak Awalan Memenuhi
Stage 2
Rekabentuk Rekabentuk
pelanggan
3. Peraturan/Perundangan D-Plan pasti bahan dan Berkuasa Berkenaan Kehendak Awalan dimana perlu
AWALAN 1. Brief Projek
4. Arahan Jabatan (Borang JKR PK(O) .02-1 spesifikasi produk
Awalan
dimana perlu ? Awalan
2. Q-Plan
Maklumbalas Penambahbaikan:
3. Rekabentuk Konsep
JKR.PK(P) 05, JKR.PK(P) 06,
4. Kos Awalan (PDA)
JKR.PK(P) 07 , JKR.PK(P) 11

Checklist No 14
DILAKSANAKAN OLEH JURUPERUNDING/JKR
Checklist No 13
C1-3: Pengiraan Rekabentuk C1-10 : Luluskan
C1-1 : Kenalpasti Sistem/Ciri C1-4: C1-7 : Verifikasi
& Sedia spesifikasi jika perlu C1-8 : Lukisan &
Rekabentuk yang dipilih C1-6: Rekabentuk
C1-2 : Validasi Spesifikasi
C1 - Sedia Adakah Ya Road safety Audit Rekabentuk Adakah jika perlu
Kenalpasti bahan Rekabentuk Terperinci
PROSES KERJA INPUT: INPUT: rekabentuk (RSA) Stage 3 Rujuk Borang Rekabentuk Terperinci Pastikan
dan Memenuhi dimana perlu Memenuhi Kehendak ?
1. Brief Projek terperinci & Designer's Compliance JKR PK(0).02-2 penyediaan
REKABENTUK 2. Q-Plan spesifikasi yang dipilih 1. ATJ Kehendak ? Rujuk Borang Ya
2. Piawaian/Spesifikasi & spesifikasi & Auditor's Compliance Tentukan no. indeks daftar lukisan
3. Rekabentuk Awalan 3. Peraturan/Perundangan
JKR PK(0).02-2
TERPERINCI termasuk lukisan oleh HOPT
4. Kos Awalan (PDA) 4. Arahan Jabatan Tidak
no.lukisan Tidak
PERINGKAT 1
C- C1-5 : Kajian Semula Rekabentuk C1-9 : Pindaan Rekabentuk dimana perlu C1-11 : Penyediaan
PROSES KERJA Rujuk Borang Rujuk Borang Pelan
JKR PK(0).02-2 JKR PK(0).02-3 PBT Sek 8
REKABENTUK
TERPERINCI
DILAKSANAKAN OLEH JURUPERUNDING/JKR Checklist No 15

C2 - Adakah
C2-1 : C2-2 : C2-3 : Ya
PROSES KERJA Sediakan Sediakan
Dokumen-Dokumen yang PROSES
Sediakan Disediakan Memenuhi
REKABENTUK 'Final Design Report' 'Tender Table Document' 'Engineer's Estimates' Kehendak ? TENDER
TERPERINCI
Tidak Tidak
PERINGKAT 2

Checklist No 16 Checklist No 17 Checklist No 18


Project Title: Revision
Date
HOPT
Checker

CHECKLIST 1 - PROJECT INITIATION

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 Have the client submitted the


following documents?

1.1 List of projects approved from


Economic Planning Unit

1.2 Project Site

1.3 Scope of works

1.4 Project cost based on scope of


works

1.5 Approved project ceiling

1.6 Approved project allocation

CHK 1 - 1/1
Project Title: Revision
Date
HOPT/HODT
Checker

CHECKLIST 2 - IDENTIFYING ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENT

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1. Fill up SPB Forms JKR.PK(O).04E-1


Senarai Semakan Keperluan
Pengurusan Pembangunan Lestari Di
Peringkat Perancangan Projek

CHK 2 - 1/1
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 3 - TRAFFIC STUDY

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1. Traffic data from HPU

2. Traffic survey/count proposal

3. Traffic projection

4. Level of service of the existing road


through out design life

5. Level of service of the propose


new/upgrading road through out
design life

6. Recommendation of lanes
configuration

CHK 3 - 1/1
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 4 - DETERMINATION OF ALIGNMENT OPTIONS

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 Desk Study

1.1 Information on the proposed road


corridor based on Feasibility Study
gathered (if any)

1.2 Overall existing road network data


gathered

1.3 Data on the future and committed


road network surrounding the project
gathered

1.4 Existing topography data gathered


and studied

1.5 Geological data gathered and studied

2.0 Field Investigation

2.1 Site reconnaisance visit conducted

2.2 Settlement/populated area identified

2.3 Road geometric constraints identified

2.4 Sensitive area identified (eg. Orang


Asli reserve, cemetry, religious etc.)

2.5 Flood level information from site visit


and/or JPS gathered and studied

2.6 Surrounding land status and activities


studied (eg. Forest reserve, Malay
reserve, Mining certificate, etc.)

CHK 4 - 1/2
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 4 - DETERMINATION OF ALIGNMENT OPTIONS

YES NO N/A REMARKS

2.7 Data on the existing land use, socio-


economic and committed
development gathered and studied

3.0 Determination of alignment options

3.1 Determination of road hierarchy

3.2 Determination of road design standard


and design speed

3.3 Defined road geometric parameters


which in line with road standard

3.4 Defined road cross section elements


which in line with road standard

3.5 Alignment options

a. Option 1

b. Option 2

c. Option 3

d. ………………………………………

3.6 Compliance of the proposed


alignment options to geometric design
guidelines

CHK 4 - 2/2
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 5 - CONCEPTUAL DESIGN

DESIGNERS ARE TO FILL UP THE FOLLOWING SUB-CHECKLIST AS FOLLOWS:

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1. Geometric - Checklist 5A

2. Drainage - Checklist 5B

3. Pavement - Checklist 5C

4. Geotechnical - Checklist 5D

5. Structure - Checklist 5E

6. Environmental - Checklist 5F

7. Electrical Works - Checklist 5G

8. Conceptual Design Report - Checklist


5H

CHK 5 - 1/1
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 5A - GEOMETRIC

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1. Road alignment options

2. Information on the routing of each


alignment options

3. Design parameters comparison of


alignment options

4. Construction cost of each alignment


options

5. Ranking matrix for each alignment


options

6. Preferred alignment

7. Advantages and disadvantages of


preferred alignment

CHK 5A - 1/1
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 5B - DRAINAGE

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 INCEPTION / CONCEPTUAL DESIGN

1.1 Desk Study

a. Location
(name of stream/river, district
etc)
b. Catchment Characteristics
(catchment area, catchment
slope, soil type, land use,
lake/swamp storage, future
change, etc)

c. River Details
(River slope, material of of
stream bed, type of debris, flow
control, existing bridges)
d. Topography

1.2 Field Investigation


a. Existing drainage system

b. Land use

c. Discharge point

1.3 Proposed Concept Design

a. Type of drainage system to be


used.

b. Typical drawings of drainage


system.

c. Location map / strip map /


sketch.

CHK 5B - 1/1
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 5C - PAVEMENT

YES NO N/A REMARKS


1. Type of Construction

a. New Road

b. Rehabilitation/upgrading

2. Type of Pavement

a. Flexible

b. Rigid

c. Semi Rigid

3. Pavement Structure

a. Conventional

b. Stabilisation

c. Recycling

CHK 5C - 1/1
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 5D - GEOTECHNICAL

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 INCEPTION / CONCEPTUAL DESIGN

1.1 Desk Study

a. Geology maps study

b. Existing SI reports of adjacent


area

c. Geological study report of


adjacent area

1.2 Field Investigation

a. Site Visit/Site Reconnaissance

1.3 Proposed Concept Design

CHK 5D - 1/1
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 5E - BRIDGE

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 INCEPTION / CONCEPTUAL DESIGN

1.1 Desk Study

i. Topography

Topography Map Search

ii. Road Network/Traffic Report


a. TIA (Traffic Impact Assessment)

b. HYPO (Traffic Generation)

c. Capacity Analysis on existing roads


/ junctions

d. Traffic Projection

e. Proposals : the need of street


lighting / traffic light

iii. Geological
a. Geological Map Search (If any)

iv. Bridge Inventory Card (if any)

v. Proposed Road Alignment


Drawing/Map

vi. Social impact study

1.2 Field Study

i. Soil Investigation Report

ii. Land survey Drawing

CHK 5E - 1/2
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 5E - BRIDGE

YES NO N/A REMARKS

iii. Hydrographic survey (inclusive of


Highest Flood Level Record )

iv. Local Authorities Requirements

a. Vertical & Horizontal Clearance

vi. Visual assessment of existing structure

1.3 Structure Conceptual Design Report

1.3.1 Conceptual Proposals

i. Numbers of new structures

ii. Numbers of structures to be


replaced/refurbished/widened

iii. Estimated bridge/structure width


required

iv. Estimated bridge/structure length


required

v. Environmental aspect /impact

vi. Social aspect/impact

1.3.2 Evaluation matrix for Conceptual Proposal

1.3.3 Recommendation for Conceptual Proposal

1.4 Design Criteria/Design Brief

CHK 5E - 2/2
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 5F - EIA PROJECT SCREENING

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1. Fill up SPB Forms JKR.PK(O).04E-2


Semakan Tapisan Keperluan Alam
Sekitar

CHK 5F - 1/1
Project Title Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 5G - ELECTRICAL WORKS

YES NO N/A REMARKS


1.0 Background

1.1 Project information

1.2 Strip map for electrical work

1.3 Class of roads , traffic category

1.4 Target tender

1.5 Operation And Maintenance Authority


Involved

1.6 Site visit report

1.7 Relocation/ protection of utility services

2.0 Scope of Electrical Works

2.1 Road lighting (RL)

2.2 Green Technology

a. Energy efficient lighting

b. Energy saving equipment

2.3 Traffic signal light system

2.4 Pedestrian bridge

2.5 Pedestrian crossing

2.6 Bus stop

2.7 Tunnel Lighting

CHK 5G - 1/3
Project Title Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 5G - ELECTRICAL WORKS

YES NO N/A REMARKS

3.0 Concept Design

3.1 Existing System (Road Lighting/Traffic Signal


Light)

a. Photograph on existing system/road

b. Type of pole and mounting height

c. Existing Feeder Pillar

3.2 Cross Section of Road

3.3 Proposed Design

a. Lighting Class

b. Type of Columns (with/without arm)

c. Luminaire (Type & Wattage)

d. Energy efficient luminaire (green


Technology)

e. Type of Cables

f. Feeder Pillar

g. Earthing system

h. Light Pollution Control

j. Proposed Power Supply System

k. Block Diagram for Electrical System

l. Traffic Signal Light System

CHK 5G - 2/3
Project Title Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 5G - ELECTRICAL WORKS

YES NO N/A REMARKS

m. Fully Vehicle Actuated

n. Traffic Control Strategy eg. CMS,


SCATS, SCOOT, MITS

4.0 Estimated Life Cycle Cost

4.1 Preliminary Project Estimation

a. Capital cost

b. TNB Contribution/Connection Charges

4.2 Maintenance Estimate

4.3 Operational Cost (Energy & communication)

4.4 Agency responsible for electricity bill

5.0 Constraint

5.1 Geometric Constraints

5.2 Maintenance Constraints

5.3 Road surface

5.4 Local Authority Requirement

6.0 Organisation

6.1 Design team & propose site supervision team


(HODT, PRB, etc.)

CHK 5G - 3/3
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 5H - CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1. Project background and scopes

2. Existing conditions
2.1 Existing topography and
geography
2.2 Existing horizontal alignment

2.2 Existing vertical alignment

2.2 Physical constraint and


encumbrances
2.2 Junction and access control

2.3 Environmental and socioeconomic

3. Traffic analysis
3.1 Traffic data from HPU

3.2 Traffic survey /count proposal

3.3 Traffic projection

3.4 Roadway capacity of the existing


road through out design life
3.5 Roadway capacity of the propose
upgrading lane configuration
through out design life
3.6 Recommendation of lane
configuration

4. Conceptual proposal
4.1 Geometric design standard and
design speed
4.2 Parameter on design control and
criteria
4.3 Parameter on cross sectional
elements

CHK 5H - 1/2
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 5H - CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT

YES NO N/A REMARKS

4.4 Parameter on geometric design

4.5 Pavement design

4.6 Intersections and U-turns

4.7 Climbing lanes

4.8 Overtaking lanes

4.9 Bridge, structure and box culvert

4.10 Drainage

4.11 Geotechnical

4.12 Environmental

4.13 Electrical works

5. Alignment options
5.1 Alternative alignments approach
and category
5.2 Detail decription/explanation of
each alternative alignment option
5.3 Comparison between alternative
alignment
5.4 Cost estimate of alignment option

5.5 Recommendation of alignment

6. Conclusion and recommendation

CHK 5H - 2/2
Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 6 - ROAD SAFETY AUDIT STAGE 1

YES NO N/A REMARKS

INFORMATION REQUIRED TO BE GIVEN TO AUDITOR

1. Maps/Plans of the region and road


Network

2. Traffic reports showing existing and


projected Traffic Flow information on the
arterial road network

3. Details of any proposed local and area


wide traffic management strategies

4. Maps/Plans showing existing and


proposed land-usage strategies

5. Planning reports and associates plans,


typical cross-sections, proposed
gradelines etc comprising the plans to be
audited

REPORT TO BE PREPARED BY DESIGNER AS PART OF RSA PROCESS


(refer to flowchart RSA Stage 1 Process)

6. Designer's Response Report

CHK6 - 1/1
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 7A - CONCEPTUAL STAGE OUTPUT

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1. Feasibility Report

2. Inception Report

3. Conceptual Design Report

4. Scope for Survey Works

5. Scope for SI Works

6. Preliminary Detail Abstract (PDA)

CHK 7A - 1/1
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 7B - PREPARATION OF PRE BID DOCUMENT (DESIGN & BUILD)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 CHECKLIST FOR TENDERERS


(which shall not form part of the Pre Bid Document)

1.1 Notice of invitation to tender

i) Amount of pre bid document

ii) Place, date and time of


submission of tender

iii) Notice to Tenderers for breaching


the rules

1.2 Checklist for Content of Pre Bid


Document

1.3 Submission checklist for the use of


Tenderers

1.4 Tenderer's Information Forms

Borang A
Surat Pengakuan Kebenaran
Maklumat Dan Keesahan Dokumen
Yang Dikemukakan Oleh Petender

Borang B
Maklumat Am Dan Latar Belakang
Petender

Borang C
Data-Data Kewangan

Borang CA
Laporan Bank/Institusi Kewangan
Mengenai Kedudukan Kewangan
Petender

CHK 7B - 1/12
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 7B - PREPARATION OF PRE BID DOCUMENT (DESIGN & BUILD)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

Borang D
Rekod Pengalaman Kerja

Borang E
Kakitangan Teknikal

Borang F
Keempunyaan Loji Dan Peralatan
Pembinaan Utama
Borang G
Senarai Kerja Kontrak Semasa

Borang GA
Laporan Penyelia Projek Atas Prestasi
Kerja Semasa Petender (Bukan
Projek JKR)

Borang GA1
Laporan Jurutera Projek Atas Prestasi
Kerja Semasa Petender

Borang H
Sijil SCORE dari CIDB

1.5 Checklist for 'Dokumen Wajib'.

1.6 Bank Guarantee Forms / Insurance


Guarantee for Performance Bond

1.7 Advance Payment Guarantee Forms /


Insurance Guarantee for Advance
Payment

1.8 Bank Guarantee Forms for Design


Guarantee

1.9 List of Drawings (if any)

CHK 7B - 2/12
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 7B - PREPARATION OF PRE BID DOCUMENT (DESIGN & BUILD)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.10 List of Drawings which given for


Tenderers (if any)

1.11 Pre Bid Document

2.0 PRE BID DOCUMENT

2.1 COVER FOR PRE BID DOCUMENT


Standard Colour is Yellow
- Autofinish Golden Yellow (ICI 456) or
equivalent

Ensure the following information of Pre


Bid's Covers :-
a) Coat of Arms of Malaysia
(Jata Negara)

b) Words of "Kerajaan Malaysia"

c) Words of "Jabatan Kerja Raya


Malaysia"

d) Word of "Dokumen Tender"

e) Ensure the Project Title similar


as regitstered in SKALA.

f) Tender registration number (if any)

g) Volume and section of Pre Bid's


Document

h) JKR symbol

i. Month and year of tender is


stated under 'JKR Symbol'.

CHK 7B - 3/12
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 7B - PREPARATION OF PRE BID DOCUMENT (DESIGN & BUILD)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

ii. KPKR's address at the left


bottom of pre Bid's cover

KETUA PENGARAH KERJA RAYA


JABATAN KERJA RAYA MALAYSIA
JALAN SULTAN SALAHUDDIN
50582 KUALA LUMPUR

Cover sample :-

KERAJAAN MALAYSIA
JABATAN KERJA RAYA MALAYSIA

DOKUMEN PRA-TAWARAN

UNTUK
(NAMA PROJEK)

NO. TENDER :

SEKSYEN I/II
KETUA PENGARAH KERJA RAYA
JABATAN KERJA RAYA MALAYSIA
JALAN SULTAN SALAHUDDIN
50582 KUALA LUMPUR
JULAI 2010

2.2 CONTENT OF PRE BID DOCUMENT

2.2.1 SECTION 1

(A) INSTRUCTION TO TENDERERS (Use Standard)

i) Maximum completion Period (In


weeks)

ii) Place and time Tender Table


Document is displayed.

CHK 7B - 4/12
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 7B - PREPARATION OF PRE BID DOCUMENT (DESIGN & BUILD)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

iii) Office's address which issue the


tender if any discrepancies,
queries and objection arises

iv) Appendices to the Instruction to


Tenderers (if any)

Appendix A
a) Maximum completion period
approved by HOPT
b) Harga Inginan Jabatan

c) Sijil SCORE dari CIDB

Appendix B
Guidelines for preparation of
'Environmental Management Plan' by
Contractor approved by HODT

Appendix C
Dasar Pengagihan Kerja Kepada
Kontraktor Bumiputera Kelas E dan F
(Gred I & II CIDB)
i) Lampiran A
Deed Of Assignment (Security For
Direct Payments To Third Party)

ii) Lampiran B
Consent By Government For
Direct Payment To Third Party
Through Deed of Assignment
iii) Lampiran C
Surat Jaminan Tanggung Rugi
Dari Subkontraktor Kepada
Kerajaan

CHK 7B - 5/12
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 7B - PREPARATION OF PRE BID DOCUMENT (DESIGN & BUILD)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

Appendix D
Pelaksanaan Integrity Pact / Surat
Akuan Pembida
i) Lampiran 1 A
Surat Akuan Pembida

ii) Lampiran 1B
Surat Akuan Pembida Berjaya

(B) NEED STATEMENT (CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENT)


Use the need statement which
approved by HOPT

Ensure the following :-


1 - Appendix 1 - Location map
2 - Appendix 2 - Facilities for PD
3 - Appendix 3 - List of Contractor's
Consultants

(C) FORM OF TENDER (PWD DB/T - A2002)

i) Use latest Form of Tender (PWD


DB/T-A2002)

ii) Check the Project Title is correct

iii) State the office's address which


will received the tender

(D) LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE (JKR 203D)

i) Use latest standard Letter of


Acceptance (JKR 203D) (pind.
1/2011)

CHK 7B - 6/12
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 7B - PREPARATION OF PRE BID DOCUMENT (DESIGN & BUILD)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

(E) PWD FORM DB (Rev. 2010)

Use standard Conditions of Contract


P.W.D FORM DB (REV. 2010)

Addendum to the COC

Page 1
Fill in the following informations:-

i) Category & Sub Category, year

ii) Paragraph A - Project's name


* Leave blank in others

Page 3
Clause (q) "P.D."
Fill in the Officer's Designation
Refer to 'Surat Arahan KPKR Bil.
1/2010 or latest 'Arahan KPKR'.

Page 63 - APPENDIX 1
Klausa 8.6(a)
State the officer's designation who
authorised to approve the Variation of
Works.

State the financial limit for Variation of


Works

State the financial limit for Variation of


Works
Refer to 'Surat Pekeliling Perbendaharaan
Bil. 7 Tahun 2007 dated 14 Mei 2007 and 'Surat
Arahan KPKR Bil. 5/2008 dated 24 Oktober 2008.
or the latest.

CHK 7B - 7/12
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 7B - PREPARATION OF PRE BID DOCUMENT (DESIGN & BUILD)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

Clause 8.6 (b)


State the officer's designation who
authorised to take actions on the
particular clauses
Refer to 'Surat Arahan KPKR Bil. 1/2010 or
latest "Surat Arahan KPKR'.

Clause 5.5
Fill in the date when the tender closed

Clause 10
Amount Of Guarantee
- Fill in "RM 5% of Contract Sum"

Page 64 - APPENDIX 1
Klausa 39 - Public Liability Insurance
Fill in the amount as per circulars
'- Refer 'Surat KPKR BIL.(28)dlm.JKR.KPKR:020.050/03
Klt.5 dated 9 Februari 2003

Clause 43 - Sectional Completion


a) Fill in the information of sectional
completion (if any)

b) If none, state " Not Applicable"

Clause 45 - LAD
Fill in Liquidated Ascertain Damages
(LAD) in %. (refer latest BLR)
(BLR/365 days x 100% = x %)

Clause 48 - Defects Liability Period


Fill in Twenty Four (24) months

Clause 53.3 - Minimum amount for interim payment


Fill in RM1000.00
'- Refer 'Surat KPKR BIL.(28)dlm.JKR.KPKR:020.050/03
Klt.4 dated 15.10.2001

CHK 7B - 8/12
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 7B - PREPARATION OF PRE BID DOCUMENT (DESIGN & BUILD)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

Page 65 - APPENDIX 1
Clause 53.5 - Period of honouring the payment
- Fill in "Thirty (30) days"

ADDENDUM TO THE CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT (IF ANY)


Insert the addendum to the
Cconditions of Contract (if any)

APPENDIX 2 - SCHEDULE PAYMENT


Insert flysheet and state'not applicable'

APPENDIX 3 - GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS


Government's requirement consisting of two (2) sections :-
1 - Contractual requirement
Insert flysheet and state 'refer to
Part B of Volume I'

2 - Technical requirement
Insert flysheet and state 'refer to
Part A of Volume II'

APPENDIX 4 - CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL


Insert flysheet and state 'refer to Part B
of Volume II'

APPENDIX 5 - TENDER SUM ANALYSIS


- Use colour paper (green colour is
the normal colour been used)
** - Put the foot note stated that the tender sum analysis is only a
guidelines to the tenderers.

APPENDIX 6 - SCHEDULE OF RATES


Insert flysheet and state 'to be inserted'

APPENDIX 7 - DESIGN GUARANTEE FORM


Slot in Design Guarantee Forms as
per 'Pekeliling KPKR Bil 7/2011

CHK 7B - 9/12
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 7B - PREPARATION OF PRE BID DOCUMENT (DESIGN & BUILD)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

APPENDIX 8 - GOVERNMENT MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT


OPERATORS
Ensure the 34 multimodal companies
as per Treasury Instruction

(F) BILL OF QUANTITIES


Insert flysheet and state 'to be
inserted'

(G) SCHEDULE OF PARTICULARS


Slot in the standard forms for plants &
dayworks

(H) SCHEDULE OF PROGRAMME OF WORKS


Insert flysheet and state 'to be
inserted' by tenderers
(J) SCHEDULE OF CONTRACTORS ORGANISATIONS CHARTS
Insert flysheet and state 'to be
inserted' by tenderers
(K) SCHEDULE OF CONSULTANTS SUPERVISION CHARTS
Insert flysheet and state 'to be
inserted' by tenderers
(L) LIST OF DRAWINGS
Insert flysheet and state 'to be
inserted' by tenderers

2.2.2 SECTION II - SPECIFICATION


Covers similar to Section II

(A) Government's Requirement (Technical Requirement)


Use the 'Technical Requirement'
which has been approved by HOPT

Ensure the followings appendices included:-

i) App. A1 - General Layout

CHK 7B - 10/12
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 7B - PREPARATION OF PRE BID DOCUMENT (DESIGN & BUILD)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

ii) App. A2 - JKR Design Guidelines

iii) App. A3 - Road Safety Audit


Proposal

iv) App. A4 - Terms of Reference for


Bridges

v) App. A5 - Geotechnical Design


Requirement

vi) App. A6 - Technical Requirement


for Road Design

vii) App. A7 - Facilities for Project


Director

(B) Technical Proposal


Insert flysheet and state 'to be
inserted' by tenderers

(C) Standard Specification


(used standard specification which has been approved by HODT)

i) JKR/SPJ/2008-S8 Traffic Signal


System - SAKPKR Bil.15/2011

ii) JKR/SPJ/2008-S9 Concrete -


SAKPKR Bil. 1/2011

iii) JKR/SPJ/2008-S4 Flexible


Pavement - SAKPKR Bil. 14/2011

iv) JKR/SPJ/1988 whichever relevant


and still valid

CHK 7B - 11/12
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 7B - PREPARATION OF PRE BID DOCUMENT (DESIGN & BUILD)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

Ensure the specification for the bridge works and geotechnical works (if any) :
i) Prestressing works

ii) Structural Steel Works

iii) Bridge Bearings

iv) Expansion Joints

v) Parapets

vi) Slope Stabilisation

vii) Rock Stabilisation.

(B) ADDENDUM TO THE SPECIFICATION


(used addendum specification which
has been approved by HODT)

(C) ADDENDUM
SPECIAL PROVISION
TO THE SPECIFICATION
TO THE SPECIFICATION
(used special provision to the
secification which has been approved
by HODT)

(D) ADDITIONAL SPECIFICATION


(IF ANY)

2.2.3 SECTION III - DRAWINGS


This section is not necessary
Drawings and list of drawings will be submitted by the Tenderers

CHK 7B - 12/12
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 8 - SURVEY WORKS

YES NO N/A

1.0 Appointment of surveyor

1.1 Preparation of Terms of Reference


(TOR) for survey works

1.2 Scope of works


a. Determine land survey corridor

b. Determine site survey location

i. Bridge/River

ii. Junction

c. Marking of SI location (estimate


borehole location)

d. ROW marker

e. Utility mapping (if any)

1.3 Financial and technical proposal

2.0 Data submission

a. Data submission as per TOR

b. Sufficiency & accuracy of survey


data

CHK 8 - 1/2
CHECKLIST 8 - SURVEY WORKS

REMARKS

CHK 8 - 2/2
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 9 - LAND ACQUISITION SECTION 4

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1. Cadastral plan gathered

2. Minimum freezing zone width


determined and agreed

3. Mukim and Daerah boundary defined

4. Drawing presentation and format as


agreed by Jabatan Ketua Pengarah
Tanah dan Galian (JKPTG)/Pejabat
Tanah dan Galian Negeri (PTG)

5. Proposed freezing zone line and lots


effected indicated on plan and land
acquisition (LA) schedule

6. Appropriate copies of LA plan


prepared as directed by JKPTG/PTG

CHK 9 - 1/1
Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 10 - SCOPES OF SOIL INVESTIGATION WORKS

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 SI Scope:

1.1 Is the type and quantity of


Soil Investigation described?
(e.g. Bored Hole, Vane Shear,
JKR Probe)

1.2 Are the termination criteria


explained in the scope?

1.2.1 For Cut Area

1.2.2 For Fill Area

1.2.3 For propose Bridge Area (if


any)

1.3 Is the estimated time of Soil


Investigation work carried out
stated?

1.4 Is the cost estimated for SI


Works provided?

2.0 SI Specification

2.1 Is the SI Specification


provided?

CHK 10 - 1/2
Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 10 - SCOPES OF SOIL INVESTIGATION WORKS

YES NO N/A REMARKS

3.0 Drawing for Soil Investigation Scope:

3.1 Are the locations of proposed


field test clearly draw in the
drawing? (BH, JP, Vane shear,
etc)

3.2 Are the coordinates of


suggested Soil
Investigation location clearly
stated
the in
drawing? (BH, JP, Vane
shear, etc)

3.3 Are the contour/spot height of


the existing ground shown?

3.4 Are the legends of the proposed


field test clearly shown?

3.5 Are the existing road and


proposed road shown in the
drawing (if necessary i.e: for
road widening)?

CHK 10 - 2/2
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11 - PRELIMINARY DESIGN

DESIGNERS ARE TO FILL UP THE FOLLOWING SUB-CHECKLIST AS FOLLOWS:

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1. Geometric - Checklist 11A

2. Drainage - Checklist 11B

3. Pavement - Checklist 11C

4. Geotechnical - Checklist 11D

5. Structure - Checklist 11E

6. Environmental - Checklist 11F

7. Electrical Works - Checklist 11G

CHK 11 - 1/1
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11A - GEOMETRIC

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENT

1.1 Compliance of minimum horizontal


radius, spiral length and SE for each
horizontal curve

1.2 Widening at horizontal curve (if


required)

1.3 Overtaking / climbing lane

1.4 Compliance of vertical gradient

1.5 Compliance of K value for vertical


curve

1.6 Compliance of minimum freeboard


and clearance from culvert/bridge are
designed in accordance with
JPS/TNB/KTMB etc. requirement.

1.7 Compliance of combination of


horizontal and vertical curve

1.8 Adequacy of sight distances

2.0 CROSS SECTION

2.1 Cross sectional elements defined and


adequate width
a. Lane

b. Paved shoulder

c. Usable shoulder

d. Median

CHK 11A - 1/3


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11A - GEOMETRIC

YES NO N/A REMARKS

e. Verge

f. Walkway

g. Minimum Right-of-Way

h. Bridge cross section

i. Utility reserve (if required)

j. .................................

2.2 Special lane for motorcycle and


bicycle
2.3 Consistency of road cross section
along the alignment

3.0 INTERSECTIONS

3.1 Control of access

3.2 Proposed intersection location and


configuration

3.3 Basic intersection layout which


include of auxiliary lane, accellaration
lane, decellaration lane, through lane,
etc

3.4 Turning radius caters for suitable type


of vehicle (PU/SU design vehicle)

CHK 11A - 2/3


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11A - GEOMETRIC

YES NO N/A REMARKS

4.0 DRAWING PRESENTATION

4.1 Drawing presentation shall be in


accordance with ATJ 6/85
Tables, figures and illustrations are
correctly refered

4.2 Units are consistent

4.3 Drawing title, number, scale are


correct.

4.4 The design output satisfies all specific


regulatory (JKR, LLM, DBKL, etc) and
client requirements, EIA report, TIA
report, RSA report, etc

4.5 All standard drawings meet with


clients and regulatory requirements

CHK 11A - 3/3


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11B - DRAINAGE

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 PRELIMINARY DESIGN

1.1 Assessment report on existing


drainage system

1.2 Determination of Design Criteria

a. Minimum size of culvert for main


crossing, acccess culvert,
balancing culvert etc.

b. Design Flood Level

c. Determine Average Recurrence


Interval (ARI) for design.

d. Min /max water velocity

e. Gradient

1.3 Hidrology Analysis

a. Calculate catchment area

b. Determination of design method

c. Determination of surface runoff

1.4 Hydraulic Analysis

a. Determine type and size of drain

b. Determine type and size of culvert

c. Determine type of inlet and outlet


structure of culvert.

d. Determine flow direction of water.

CHK 11B - 1/2


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11B - DRAINAGE

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.5 Approval from Authority Agencies (JPS


/…/)

1.6 Preliminary Design Drawings

a. Preliminary Drainage layout plan

b. Typical drawings of surface


drainage & culvert.

CHK 11B - 2/2


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST11C - PAVEMENT

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1. Traffic Estimation

a. Current ADT

b. No of lane

c. % Heavy vehicles

d. Growth rate

e. Type of terrain

f. Carriageway width

g. Structural layer coefficient

h. CBR value

i. Existing

ii. Designed

2. Material Properties

a. Asphalt concrete

b. Cement stabilised crusher run

c. Sand, laterite

d. Crushed aggregate

e. Cement stabilised subbase

CHK 11C - 1/2


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST11C - PAVEMENT

YES NO N/A REMARKS


3. Additional information for
upgrading works
a. Type of mixes:

i. Porous asphalt

ii. Stone mastic asphalt

iii. Gap graded asphalt

iv. Hot in place recycling

v. Cold in place recycling

vi. Polymer modified asphalt

vii Surface treatment


.
b. Existing pavement thickness

i. Asphalt layer

ii. Roadbase

iii. Subbase

c. Pavement evaluation report

CHK 11C - 2/2


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11D - GEOTECHNICAL

DESIGNERS ARE TO FILL UP THE FOLLOWING SUB-CHECKLIST AS FOLLOWS:

YES NO N/A REMARKS

Geotechnical Scope:
1. SI Result - Sub-Checklist 11D-1

2. Centreline Cuts and embankments (for normal


ground) - Sub-Checklist 11D-2

3. Embankments over soft ground - Sub-Checklist


11D-3

4. Retaining Structures - Sub-Checklist 11D-4

5. Structures Foundation - Sub-Checklist 11D-5

6. Ground Improvement - Sub-Checklist 11D-6

7. Drawing - Sub-Checklist 11D-7

CHK 11D - 1/1


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11D-1 - RESULTS OF SOIL INVESTIGATION

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 Geotechnical Report Text:

1.1 Is the general location of the


investigation described?

1.2 Is scope and purpose of the


investigation summarized?

1.3 Is concise description given of


geologic setting and
topography of area?

1.4 Are the field explorations and


laboratory tests on which the
report is based listed?

1.5 Is the general description of


subsurface soil, rock, and
groundwater conditions given?

1.6 Is the submitted SI Report


complete with the geotechnical
report (typically included in the
report appendices):

a. Test hole logs

b. Field test data?

c. Laboratory test data?

d. Photographs (if pertinent)?

1.7 Is the SI work on site carried


out arcordance to the MS
2038?

CHK 11D-1 - 1/3


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11D-1 - RESULTS OF SOIL INVESTIGATION

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.8 Is the Soil Investigation Report


signed by Profesional
Engineer?

2.0 Plan and Subsurface Profile:

2.1 Is the subsurface profile of the


investigation site provided?

2.2 Does the conducted site


investigation meet minimum
criteria outlined as per Soil
Investigation Scope explained?

2.3 Are the exploration plotted


and correctly numbered on the
profile at their true elevation
and location?

2.4 Does the subsurface profile


contain a word description
and/or graphic depiction of soil
and rock types?

2.5 Are groundwater levels and


date measured shown on the
subsurface profile?

3.0 Subsurface Profile or Field Boring Log:

3.1 Are sample types and depths


recorded?

3.1 Are SPT blow count, percent


core recovery, and RQD
values shown?

CHK 11D-1 - 2/3


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11D-1 - RESULTS OF SOIL INVESTIGATION

YES NO N/A REMARKS

3.2 If cone penetration test were


made, are plots of cone
resistance and friction ratio
shown with depth?

4.0 Laboratory Test Data:

4.1 Were lab soil classification


tests such as natural moisture
content, gradation, Atterberg
limits, performed on selected
representative samples to
verify visual soil identification?

4.2 Are laboratory test results


such as shear strength,
consolidation, etc., included
and/or summarized?

CHK 11D-1 - 3/3


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST11D-2 - CENTRELINE CUTS AND EMBANKMENTS


(FOR NORMAL GROUND)
Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 Is the following information provided?

1.1 Existing surface and


subsurface drainage?

1.2 Evidence of spring and


excessively wet areas?

1.3 Slides, slump and faults noted


along the alignment?

2.0 General Soil Cut or Fill :

2.1 Specific surface/subsurface


drainage recommendations?

2.2 Excavation limits of unsuitable


materials?

2.3 Erosion protection measures


for back slope, side slopes and
ditches including riprap
recommendations or special
slope treatment?

2.4 Is the slope design limited to


maximum 6 nos of berm?

3.0 Fill Slopes / Embankments :

3.1 Is fill slope design 1:2 with


minimum 2.0m berm width and
maximum 6.0m berm height?

CHK 11D-2 - 1/3


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST11D-2 - CENTRELINE CUTS AND EMBANKMENTS


(FOR NORMAL GROUND)
Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results

YES NO N/A REMARKS

3.2 Will untreated fill slope design


provide minimum FOS=1.25?

3.3 Special usage of fill slope


stabilization (such as
geogrid/geotextiles
reinforcement, reinforced
concrete retaining structure,
reinforced fill structure,
replacing the fills with elevated
structures)? If YES, please
states the method used.

3.4 Are reinforced/stabilized fill


slopes for minimum FOS=1.5?

4.0 Soil Cuts :

4.1 Is cut slope designed 1:1.5 to


1:2 with minimum 2.0m berm
width and maximum 6.0m berm
height?

4.2 Are untreated cut slopes


designed for minimum
FOS=1.25?

4.3 Special usage of excavated


soils (such as soil nailing with
slope surface
protection/guniting, permanent
ground anchors, retaining wall,
etc)? If YES, please states the
method used.

4.4 Estimated shrink-swell factors


for excavated materials?

CHK 11D-2 - 2/3


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST11D-2 - CENTRELINE CUTS AND EMBANKMENTS


(FOR NORMAL GROUND)
Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results

YES NO N/A REMARKS

4.5 Are reinforced/stabilized cut


slopes designed for minimum
FOS=1.5?

5.0 Rock Slopes :

5.1 Rock slope design 4:1 with


minimum 2.0m berm width and
maximum 6.0m berm height?

5.2 If answer to 16 is NO, are rock


slope designed based on
orientation of major rock
jointing?

5.3 Is the need for special rock


slope stabilization measures,
e.g., permanent rock anchors,
rock dowels, rock bolting,
rockfall catch ditch, wire mesh
slope protection, shotcrete,
rock bolts, addressed?

5.4 Have effects of blast induced


vibrations on adjacent
structures been evaluated?

CHK 11D-2 - 3/3


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11D-3 - EMBANKMENTS OVER SOFT GROUND


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
Where embankments must be built over soft ground (such as soft clays, organic silts or peat),
stability and settlement of the fill should be carefully evaluated.
YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 Embankment Stability :

1.1 Has the shear strength of the


foundation soil been
determined from lab testing
and/or field vane shear or cone
penetrometer tests?

1.2 Has the bearing capacity of the


embankment been evaluated
for min FOS=1.4 (short term)?

1.3 Has the stability of the


embankment been evaluated
for minimum FOS=1.3 (short
term) and FOS=1.2(long
term)?

1.4 If the proposed embankment


does not provide minimum
factors of safety given above,
are recommendations given or
feasible treatment alternates,
which will increase factor of
safety to minimum acceptable
(such as change alignment,
lower grade, use stabilizing
counterberms, excavate and
replace unsuitable material,
lightweight fill, geotextile fabric
reinforcement, etc)? If YES,
please states the alternative
used.

CHK 11D-3 - 1/5


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11D-3 - EMBANKMENTS OVER SOFT GROUND


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
Where embankments must be built over soft ground (such as soft clays, organic silts or peat),
stability and settlement of the fill should be carefully evaluated.
YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.5 Are technical-cost-time-


constructibility comparisons of
treatment alternates given and
a specific alternate
recommended? If YES, please
list out the treatment
alternates.

2.0 Fill Slopes / Embankments :

2.1 Have consolidation properties


of fine-grained soils been
determined from laboratory
consolidation test?

2.2 Have the settlement of


embankments over soft ground
follow the design criteria below
:

5 years post construction :


▪ Within 50m from structures approach < 100mm Differential
▪ Within 100m remote from structures < 150mm Settlement
▪ Road < 250mm (Total settlement)

2.3 Have the settlement of


embankment over soft ground
designed for 90% consolidation
settlement during construction?

CHK 11D-3 - 2/5


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11D-3 - EMBANKMENTS OVER SOFT GROUND


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
Where embankments must be built over soft ground (such as soft clays, organic silts or peat),
stability and settlement of the fill should be carefully evaluated.
YES NO N/A REMARKS

2.4 For bridge approach


embankments, are
recommendations made to get
the settlement out before the
bridge abutment is constructed
(stage construction, surcharge,
pile embankment, PVD, etc)? If
YES, please states the
recommendation made.

2.5 If geotechnical instrumentation


is proposed to monitor fill
stability and settlement, are
detailed recommendations
provided on the number, type
and specific locations of the
proposed instruments?

3.0 Ground Improvement Techniques :

3.1 For PVD, do recommendations


include the coefficient of
consolidation for horizontal
drainage, ch, and the length
and spacing of PVD?

3.2 For lightweight fill/EPS, do


recommendations include the
material properties (f,c,g),
permeability, compressibility
and drainage requirements

CHK 11D-3 - 3/5


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11D-3 - EMBANKMENTS OVER SOFT GROUND


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
Where embankments must be built over soft ground (such as soft clays, organic silts or peat),
stability and settlement of the fill should be carefully evaluated.
YES NO N/A REMARKS

3.3 For vibro-compaction, do the


recommendations include
required degree of
densification (e.g., relative
density, SPT blow count, etc),
settlement limitations and
quality control?

3.4 For dynamic compaction, do


the recommendation include
required degree of
densification (e.g. relative
density, SPT blow count, etc),
settlement limitations and
quality control?

3.5 For stone columns, do the


recommendations include
spacing and dimensions of
columns, bearing capacity,
settlement characteristics and
permeability (seismic
applications)?

3.6 For grouting do the


recommendations include the
grouting method (permeation,
compaction, etc), material
improvement criteria,
settlement limitations and
quality control?

CHK 11D-3 - 4/5


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11D-3 - EMBANKMENTS OVER SOFT GROUND


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
Where embankments must be built over soft ground (such as soft clays, organic silts or peat),
stability and settlement of the fill should be carefully evaluated.
YES NO N/A REMARKS

4.0 Construction Considerations :

4.1 If excavation and replacement


of unsuitable shallow surface
deposits (peat, muck, top soil)
is recommended, are vertical
and lateral limits of
recommended excavation
provided?

4.2 Where a surcharge treatment


is recommended, are plan and
cross-section of surcharge
treatment provided in
geotechnical report for benefit
of the roadway designer?

4.3 Are instructions or


specifications provided
concerning instrumentation, fill
placement, rates and estimated
delay times for the contractor?

4.4 Are recommendations provided


for disposal of surcharge
material after the settlement
period is complete?

4.5 If answer for #19 is YES, the


method used is :
a. Asaoka method.

b. Hyperbolic method.

c. Others.

CHK 11D-3 - 5/5


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11D-4 - RETAINING STRUCTURES


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 Is the following information provided?

1.1 Recommended soil strength parameters


and groundwatr elevations for use in
computing wall design lateral earth
pressures and factor of safety for
overturning, sliding and external slope
stability.

1.2 Are acceptable reasons given for the


choice and/or exclusion of certain wall
types?

1.3 Is an analysis of the wall stability included


with minimum acceptable factors of safety
against :

a. Overturning with FOS ≥ 1.8

b. Sliding with FOS ≥ 1.6

c. Bearing with FOS ≥ 2.0

d. Global slope stability with FOS ≥ 1.5

1.4 If wall will placed on compressible


foundation soils, are these informations
given?

a. Estimated total settlement.

b. Differential settlement.

c. Time rate of settlement.

1.5 Will wall types selected for compressible


foundation soils allow differential
movement without distress?

CHK 11D-4 - 1/2


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11D-4 - RETAINING STRUCTURES


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS
1.6 If wall allow to move, are these
requirement follows?

a. Max permissible vertical movement


15mm along face of wall.

b. Max permissible lateral movement


15mm along face of wall.

c. Max permissible differential movement


1:150 along face of wall.

1.7 Are the external and internal stability


of retaining wall design as per BS 8006
requirement?

1.8 Are wall drainage details, including


materials and compaction provided?

2.0 Construction Considerations :

2.1 Are excavation requirements covered


including safe slopes for open excavations
or need for sheeting or shoring?

2.2 Fluctuation of groundwater table?

2.3 For soil nail and anchor walls are the


following included in the report?
a. Design soil parameters : f, c, g

b. Monimum bore size (soil nail)?

c. Design pullout resistance (soil nails)?

d. Ultimate anchor capacity (anchors)?

e. Corrosion protection requirements?

CHK 11D-4 - 2/2


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11D-5 - STRUCTURE FOUNDATION


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 STRUCTURE FOUNDATIONS - DRIVEN PILES

1.1 Is the recommended pile type given


(displacement, non-displacement, steel
pipe, concrete, H-Pile, etc.) with valid
reasons for choice and/or exclusion?

1.2 Is the recommended pile


type(s) to be the most suitable and
economical?

1.3 Are estimated pile lengths and


estimated tip elevations is stated for the for
the recommended allowable pile design
loads?

1.4 Is the recommended


design loads to be reasonable?

1.5 Has pile group settlement been


estimated (only of practical significant for
friction pile groups ending in cohesive
soil)?

1.6 If a specified or minimum pile tip


elevation is recommended, is clear
reasons given for the required tip
elevation, such as underlying soft layers,
scour, downdrag, pile uneconomically
long, etc,?

1.7 Has design analysis (wave equation


analysis) verified that the recommended
pile section can be be driven to the
estimated or specified tip elevation without
damage (especially applicable where
dense gravel-cobble-boulder layers or
other obstructions have to be penetrated)?

CHK 11D-5 - 1/6


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11D-5 - STRUCTURE FOUNDATION


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.8 Where scour piles are required, have


pile design and driving criteria been
established based on mobilizing the full
pile design capacity below the scour zone?

1.9 Where lateral load capacity of large


diameter piles is an important design
consideration, are p-y curves (load vs.
deflection) or soil parameters given in the
geotechnical report to allow the structural
engineer to evaluate lateral load capacity
of all piles?

1.10 For pile supported bridge abutments


over soft ground:

a. Has abutments downdrag load been


estimated and solutions such bitumen
coating been considered in design? Not
generally required if surcharging of the fill
is being performed.

b. Is bridge approach slab recommended


to moderate differential settlement
between bridge end and fill?

c. If the majority of subsoil settlement


will not be removed prior to abutment
construction (by surcharging), has
estimate been made of abutment rotation
that can occur due to lateral squeeze of
soil subsoil?

d. Does the geotechnical report specially


alert the structural designer to the
estimated horizontal abutment movement?

CHK 11D-5 - 2/6


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11D-5 - STRUCTURE FOUNDATION


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.11 If bridge project is large, has pile load


test program been recommended?

1.12 For major structure in high seismic risk


area, has assessment been made of
liquefaction potential of foundation soil
during design earthquake (only loose
saturated sands and silts are susceptible
to liquefaction)?

Construction Considerations

1.13 Pile driving detail such as: boulders or


obstructions which may be encountered
during driving; need for preaugering,
jetting, spudding; need for pile tip
reinforcement; driving shoes, etc?

1.14 Excavation requirements: safe slope for


open excavation; need for sheeting or
shoring; fluctuation of groundwater table?

1.15 Have effects of pile driving operation on


adjecent structures been evaluated such
as protection againts damage caused by
footing excavation or pile driving
vibrations?

1.16 Is preconstruction condition survey to be


made of adjecent structures to prevent
unwarranted damage claims?

1.17 On large pile driving projects, have


other methods of pile driving control been
considered such as dynamic testing or
wave equation method analysis?

CHK 11D-5 - 3/6


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11D-5 - STRUCTURE FOUNDATION


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.18 Is the pile settlement follows these criteria

▪ Max 12.5mm along axis of pile at pile


head at design load.
▪ 38mm or 10% pile size at pile head
at twice design load.
▪ Residual setllement at working load
not exceed [(diameter of pile or
diagonal width for non-circular pile
/120) + 4]mm whichever is the lower
value

2.0 STRUCTURE FOUNDATIONS - DRILLED SHAFTS

2.1 Are recommended shaft diameter(s) and


length(s) for allowable design loads based
on an analysis using soil parameters for
side friction and end bearing?

2.2 Settlement estimated for recommeded


design load?

2.3 Where lateral load capacity of shaft is


an important design consideration, are p-y
(load vs deflection) curves or soils data
provided in geotechnical report that will
allow structural engineer to evaluate lateral
load capacity of shaft?

2.4 Is static load test (to plunging failure)


recommended?

2.5 Are the FOS of individual pile resistance


(under axial loads) design as below:
a. Shaft Resistance FOS = 2.0
b. Base Resistence FOS = 2.0

CHK 11D-5 - 4/6


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11D-5 - STRUCTURE FOUNDATION


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS

2.6 Are the FOS of individual pile resistance


(under lateral & bending loads
perpendicular to axis of pile) design as
below:

a. Ultimate Resistance FOS = 2.5

2.7 Are the FOS of group pile capacity


design as below:
a. Block bearing Capacity FOS = 2.0

Construction Considerations

2.8 Have construction methods been


evaluated, i.e., can less expensive dry
method or slurry method be used or will
casing be required?

2.9 If casing will be required, can casing


be pulled as shaft is concreted (this can
result in significant cost saving on very
large diameter shafts)?

2.10 If artesian water was encountered in


explorations, have design provissions
been included to handle it (such as by
requiring casing and tremie seal)?

2.11 Will boulders be encountered? (if


boulders will be encountered, then the use
of shafts should be seriously questioned
due to construction installation difficulties
and resultant higher cost to boulders can
cause.)

2.12 Is the pile settlement follows these criteria

a. Max 12.5mm along axis of pile at pile


head at design load.

CHK 11D-5 - 5/6


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11D-5 - STRUCTURE FOUNDATION


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS

b. 38mm or 10% pile size at pile head


at twice design load.

c. Residual setllement at working load


not exceed [(diameter of pile or
diagonal width for non-circular pile
/120) + 4]mm whichever is the lower
value

CHK 11D-5 - 6/6


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11D-6 - GROUND IMPROVEMENT


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS

1. For wick drains, do recommendation


include the coefficient of consolidation for
horizontal drainage, ch, and the length and
spacing of wick drains?

2. For lightweight fill, do recommendations


include the material properties ( f, c, g),
permeability, compressibility, and drainage
requirements?

3. For vibro compaction, do the


recommendations include required degree
of densification (e.g: realtive density, SPT
blow count, etc.), settlement limitations,
and quality control?

4. For dynamic compaction, do the


recommendations include required degree
of densification (e.g: realtive density, SPT
blow count, etc.), settlement limitations,
and quality control?

5. For stone column, do the


recommendations include spacing,
diameter & depth of columns, bearing
capacity, settlement characteristics, and
permeability?

6. For grouting, do the recommendations


include the grouting method (permeation,
compaction, etc.), material improvement
criteria, settlement limitations, and quality
control?

CHK 11D-6 - 1/1


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11D-7 - GEOTECHNICAL DRAWINGS


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS
1.0 General :
1.1 Has the appropriate geotechnical engineer
reviewed the drawing to ensure that the
design and construction recommendations
have been incorporated as intended and
that the subsurface information has been
presented correctly? This is absolutely
necessary!

1.2 Are the finished profile exploration logs


and locations included in the plans?

1.3 Have geotechnical designs prepared by


designer been reviewed and aproved by
the Senior Geotechnical Engineer?

2.0 Centreline Cuts and Embankments :


2.1 Where excavation is required, are
excavation limits and description of
unsuitable organic soils shown on the
plans?

2.2 Are special provisions included for fill


materials requiring special treatment, such
as nondurable shales, lightweight fill, etc?

2.3 Are special provisions provided for any


special rock slope excavation and
stabilization measures called for in plans,
such as controlled blasting, wire mesh
slope protection, rock bolts, shotcrete, etc?

3.0 Embankments Over Soft Ground :


3.1 Where excavation is required, are
excavation limits and description of
unsuitable soils clearly shown on the
plans?

CHK 11D-7 - 1/2


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11D-7 - GEOTECHNICAL DRAWINGS


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS

3.2 Where settlement waiting period will be


required, has estimated settlement time
been stated in the special provisions to
allow contractor to fairly price the project?

3.3 If instrumentation will be used to control


the rate of fill placement, do special
provisions clearly spell out how this will be
done and how the readings will be used to
control the contractor's operation?

4.0 Embankments Over Soft Ground :


4.1 Are limits of required selected backfill
zones clearly detailed on the plans?

4.2 Are excavation requirements sepcified,


e.g., safe slopes for excavations, need for
sheeting, etc.?

4.3 Is R.O.W limit or easements shown on


plans where anchors are to be installed?

4.4 For soil nail and anchor walls are following


included in the provisions :
a. Construction tolerances?

b. Minimum drill-hole size?

c. Material requirements?

d. Load testing procedures and


acceptable criteria?

e. Construction monitoring requirements?

CHK 11D-7 - 2/2


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11E - BRIDGE

YES NO N/A REMARKS


Structural Preliminary Design Report

1.0 Assessment report for existing


bridge/other structure (If any)

i. Assessment of bridge/other structure

ii. Assessment of others (ie. R.E Wall, R.C


Wall, slope protection, etc)

iii. Proposal

2.0 Type of Crossing

i. Information of crossing type (Roadway,


Waterway, Viaduct & Railway)

ii. Authority requirement

a. Waterway(JPS, Jabatan Laut,


Jabatan Perikanan, etc)

b. Roadway & Viaduct (JKR Federal/


State, LLM, local authority)

c. Railway (Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan


Awam Darat - SPAD, KTMB,
Monorel, ERL, etc)

3.0 Preliminary Proposal

i. Bridge Configuration

a. Determination of horizontal & vertical


alignment

b. Determination carriageway width

CHK 11E - 1/2


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11E - BRIDGE

YES NO N/A REMARKS

c. Determination of skew angle

ii. Structure type:

a. Functionality

b. Constructability

c. Safety

d. Maintainability, Accessibility and


Serviceability

e. Environment Impact Assessment

f. Aesthetic

iii. Foundation system

iv. Design Calculation :

a. Hydraulic & hydrology (waterway


crossing)

b. Preliminary Structure Design

v. Specification

CHK 11E - 2/2


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11F - EIA REPORTS

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1. Fill up SPB Forms JKR.PK(O).04E-3


Kajian Semula Alam Sekitar bagi item
1.0 hingga 3.0

CHK 11F - 1/1


Project Title Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11G - ELECTRICAL WORKS

YES NO N/A REMARKS


1.0 ROAD PROFILE

1.1 Road Type ( R#s/ U#s)

1.2 No.of Lane , Road Width, Median

1.3 Road Surface

1.4 Elevated Structure, max height

1.5 Scope of electrical works

1.6 Builder's work in connection with services

a. Location of road crossing

b. Location of sub station

c. Requirement at parapet/ NJB

d. Size of verge (adequate for electrical


services)

2.0 PROPOSED ROAD LIGHTING DESIGN

2.1 Computer simulation for Lighting level


calculation for:

a. Main road ( for different type of road


profile and lighting arrangement)

b. Conflict area ( e.g. Junction, bridges,


interchanges)

c. Tunnel

d. High mast

CHK 11G - 1/2


Project Title Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 11G - ELECTRICAL WORKS

YES NO N/A REMARKS

3.0 DRAWINGS

3.1 List of Proposed Drawings

3.2 Proposed Design Criteria

3.3 Block Diagram for Electrical distribution


system c/w source of supply

3.4 Strip Map c/w limit of projects and scope of


Elec. Works

3.5 Detailing for RSA (Stage 3) submission

a. Typical Cross Section

b. Location of poles

4.0 OTHERS

4.1 Electrical supply application ( TNB, SESB


& SESCO)

4.2 Provide at least 1 no. road lighting at bus


stop

4.3 Provide with road lighting at Pedestrian


bridge

CHK 11G - 2/2


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 12 - RSA STAGE 2

YES NO N/A REMARKS

INFORMATION REQUIRED TO BE GIVEN TO AUDITOR

1. Details of any Stage 1 (Planning stage)


Audit, including decisions made on the
matters raised in that audit

2. Planning and 'Route Adoption' reports, on


which the Preliminary Design has been
based

3. Traffic Reports containing existing and


predicted traffic flows, including design
flows, for all movements at intersections
and interchanges:

4. Preliminary layout Plans, Cross sections,


Gradelines etc to be audited

REPORT TO BE PREPARED BY DESIGNER AS PART OF RSA PROCESS


(refer to flowchart RSA Stage 2 Process)

5. Designer's Response Report

CHK 12 - 1/1
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13A - GEOMETRIC

YES NO N/A REMARKS


1.0 HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENT

1.1 Compliance of horizontal alignment design


a. Radius

b. Spiral length

c. Superelevation

d. SE rate of change

e. Length of curve

f. .................................

1.2 Widening at horizontal curve (if required)

1.3 Compliance of vertical alignment design


a. Road gradient

b. Critical grade length

c. K sag

d. K crest

e. Embankment above 25years ARI

f. Bridge soffit 1m above 100years ARI

g. Embankment above 50 years ARI for drainage


culvert crossing inclusive sufficient cover

h. Vehicular box culvert with sufficient cover

i. Rail crossing

j. Overhead crossing

CHK 13A - 1/9


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13A - GEOMETRIC

YES NO N/A REMARKS

k. Pylon/utility crossing

l. Level match for existing road to be remained

m. Pavement evaluation of existing road

n. Maximum no of berm/bench

o. .................................

1.4 Adequacy of sight distances


a. Stopping sight distance

b. Passing sight distance

1.5 Climbing lane location

1.6 Overtaking lane

1.7 Combination of horizontal and vertical curve

1.8 Distruption to local traffic movement

1.9 Access to property & houses

1.10 Crossing for pedestrian / wildlife

2.0 CROSS SECTION

2.1 Cross sectional elements defined and adequate


width with proper type provided
a. Lane width

b. Paved shoulder width

c. Usable shoulder width

d. Median width

CHK 13A - 2/9


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13A - GEOMETRIC

YES NO N/A REMARKS

e. Verge width

f. Drain reserve

g. Walkway width

h. Minimum Right-of-Way width

i. Max berm height of 6m

j. Berm width of 2.0m

k. Typical cut slope of 1:1.5

l. Typical fill slope of 1:2

m. Ramp width

o. Kerb type

p. Median type

q. Parapet type (bridge)

r. Street lighting pole

s. Bridge cross secion

t. Utility reserve (if required)

u. Road furniture

2.2 Special lane for motorcycle and bicycle

2.3 Consistency of road cross section along the


alignment

CHK 13A - 3/9


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13A - GEOMETRIC

YES NO N/A REMARKS

3.0 INTERSECTIONS

3.1 Control of access

3.2 Proposed intersection location and configuration

3.3 Design speed for through road, entering road and


intersection

3.4 Intersection horizontal and vertical alignment


comply to required standard (refer to item 9-15)

3.5 Number of lane determined and accepted (with


reference to traffic study if any)

3.6 Cross sectional elements defined for


intersection/ramp
a. Lane width and adequate width with proper

b. Paved shoulder width

c. Usable shoulder width

d. Kerb type

e. Pedestrian crossing / walkway

f. Parapet type (bridge/ramp)

g. Bridge cross section

h. Traffic signal pole and controller (if any)

i. Road lighting

3.7 Intersection elements provided and comply to


standard
a. Lane balance

CHK 13A - 4/9


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13A - GEOMETRIC

YES NO N/A REMARKS

b. Decelaration length

c. Acceleration length

d. Taper length

e. Right turn lane

f. Nose angle (Interchange)

g. Nose length (Interchange)

h. Turning radius as per required type of vehicle


(PU, SU or WB40)

i. Intersection spacing

3.8 Island type and shape


a. Size of island checked and suitable island type
determined

b. Island deflection angle provided and accepted

3.9 Left turn lane


a. Radius comply to design speed

b. Lane width comply to adopted radius

3.10 Adequacy of sight distances


a. Approach sight distance (ASD)

b. Entering or crossing sight distance (ESD)

c. Safe intersection sight distance (SISD)

d. Sight distance to queue vehicle

CHK 13A - 5/9


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13A - GEOMETRIC

YES NO N/A REMARKS

4.0 U-TURN

4.1 U-turn location and type

4.2 Distance between u-turn

4.3 median width (for direct u-turn)

5.0 ROAD FURNITURE

5.1 Guide sign


a. Lettering size & font

b. Location (wording) on sign

c. Continuation of new destination sign along the


road

d. Continuation of new and existing destination


sign at project connection

e. Location of destination sign

f. Destination sign face as per JKR requirement

g. .................................

5.2 Warning sign


a. Sign size

b. Location of sign

c. Sign face as per JKR requirement

d. .................................

CHK 13A - 6/9


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13A - GEOMETRIC

YES NO N/A REMARKS

5.3 Regulatory sign


a. Sign size

b. Location of sign

c. Sign face as per JKR requirement

d. .................................

5.4 Road marking and delineation


a. Road marking type and width being used

b. Type and location of road marking comply to


standard

c. RRPM

d. Delineator post

e. .................................

5.5 Barrier
a. Type of barrier

b. Post spacing of guardrail

c. End treatment of guardrail

d. Location of guardrail along the alignment

e. Concrete barrier type accepted (NJB/H type)

f. barrier height and impact load type

g. Location of barrier along the alignment

h. .................................

CHK 13A - 7/9


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13A - GEOMETRIC

YES NO N/A REMARKS

6.0 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

6.1 Define working & construction area

6.2 Transition area for diverted traffic

6.3 Buffer space between transition area and


construction area

6.4 No destruption to traffic flow

6.5 Existing access for local traffic movement remained

6.6 Overall number of phases accepted

6.7 Traffic management devices location, type and


function accepted
a. Signs

b. Channelising devices

c. Markings

d. Lighting devices

e. Flagging

f. .................................

7.0 DRAWING PRESENTATION

7.1 Drawing presentation shall be in accordance with


ATJ 6/85

7.2 Tables, figures and illustrations are correctly


referenced.

CHK 13A - 8/9


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13A - GEOMETRIC

YES NO N/A REMARKS

7.3 Units are consistent

7.4 Drawing title, number, scale are correct.

7.5 All interfacing with others has been sorted out.

7.6 The design output satisfies all specific regulatory


(JKR, LLM, DBKL, etc) and client requirements,
EIA report, TIA report, RSA Stage 2 report, etc.

7.7 All standard drawings meet with clients and


regulatory requirements.

8.0 OTHERS

8.1 Provision of Rest and Service area

CHK 13A - 9/9


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13B - DRAINAGE

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 DETAILED DESIGN

1.1 Design Report

a. Summary of Design Criteria

b. Summary of Design Constraints

c. Summary of changes in design

d. Design Effectiveness:

i. Functionality

ii. Constructibility

iii. Safety

iv. Maintainability, Accessibility and


Serviceability

v. Asthetic

1.2 Design Calculations

a. Hydrological Analysis

b. Hydraulic Design :

i. Surface Drainage

ii. Sub-surface Drainage

iii. Culvert

iv. Foundation of culvert

c. Check Hydrological calculations

CHK 13B - 1/2


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13B - DRAINAGE

YES NO N/A REMARKS

d. Check Hydraulic calculations

e. Check Structural calculations (where


necessary)

1.3 Detailed Drainage Design Drawings

a. Culvert :

i. Type of bedding

ii. Height of fill

iii. Size and slope

iv. For project involving of an existing


road, ensure that the existing culvert
is extended sufficiently

v. Discharge points of culvert and where


they lead to.

b. Surface Drainage:

i. Location of drainage - cut section,


embankment section etc.

ii. Discharge points

CHK 13B - 2/2


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13C - PAVEMENT

YES NO N/A REMARKS


1.0 Design Calculation Input

1.1 Design life

1.2 Current ADT

1.3 No of lane

1.4 % Heavy vehicles

1.5 Growth rate

1.6 Type of terrain

1.7 Carriageway width

1.8 Structural layer coefficient

1.9 CBR value

a. Existing

b. Designed

2.0 Material Properties

2.1 Asphalt concrete

2.2 Cement stabilised crusher run

2.3 Sand, laterite

2.4 Crushed aggregate

2.5 Cement stabilised subbase

CHK 13C - 1/3


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13C - PAVEMENT

YES NO N/A REMARKS

3.0 Additional Information For Upgrading Works

3.1 Type of mixes:

a. Porous asphalt

b. Stone mastic asphalt

c. Gap graded asphalt

d. Hot in place recycling

e. Cold in place recycling

f. Polymer modified asphalt

g. Surface treatment

3.2 Pavement evaluation report


a. Crack type

b. IRI

c. Rut depth

d. Asphaltic layer thickness

e. Roadbase layer thickness

f. Subbase layer thickness

g. Strength of existing asphaltic layer

h. Strength of existing roadbase layer

j. Strength of existing subbase layer

k. Strength of existing subgrade

CHK 13C - 2/3


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13C - PAVEMENT

YES NO N/A REMARKS

4.0 Design Output

Design Thickness (check for minimum thickness)

4.1 Wearing course

4.2 Binder course

4.3 Base course

a. Bituminous (Min. 50mm)

b. Crusher aggregate (Min. 200mm)

c. Cement treated (Min. 100mm)

4.4 Subbase course

a. Granular (Min. 100mm)

b. Cement treated (Min. 150mm)

CHK 13C - 3/3


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13D - GEOTECHNICAL

DESIGNERS ARE TO FILL UP THE FOLLOWING SUB-CHECKLIST AS FOLLOWS:

YES NO N/A REMARKS

Geotechnical Scope:

1. SI Result - Sub-Checklist 13D-1

2. Centreline Cuts and embankments


(for normal ground) - Sub-Checklist 13D-2

3. Embankments over soft ground - Sub-


Checklist 13D-3

4. Retaining Structures - Sub-Checklist 13D-4

5. Structures Foundation - Sub-Checklist 13D-5

6. Ground Improvement - Sub-Checklist 13D-6

7. Drawing - Sub-Checklist 13D-7

CHK 13D - 1/1


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13D-1 - RESULTS OF SOIL INVESTIGATION

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 Geotechnical Report Text:

1.1 Is the general location of the


investigation described?

1.2 Is scope and purpose of the


investigation summarized?

1.3 Is concise description given of


geologic setting and
topography of area?

1.4 Are the field explorations and


laboratory tests on which the
report is based listed?

1.5 Is the general description of


subsurface soil, rock, and
groundwater conditions given?

1.6 Is the submitted SI Report


complete with the geotechnical
report (typically included in the
report appendices):

a. Test hole logs

b. Field test data?

c. Laboratory test data?

d. Photographs (if pertinent)?

1.7 Is the SI work on site carried


out arcordance to the MS
2038?

CHK 13D-1 - 1/3


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13D-1 - RESULTS OF SOIL INVESTIGATION

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.8 Is the Soil Investigation Report


signed by Profesional
Engineer?

2.0 Plan and Subsurface Profile:

2.1 Is the subsurface profile of the


investigation site provided?

2.2 Does the conducted site


investigation meet minimum
criteria outlined as per Soil
Investigation Scope explained?

2.3 Are the exploration plotted


and correctly numbered on the
profile at their true elevation
and location?

2.4 Does the subsurface profile


contain a word description
and/or graphic depiction of soil
and rock types?

2.5 Are groundwater levels and


date measured shown on the
subsurface profile?

3.0 Subsurface Profile or Field Boring Log:

3.1 Are sample types and depths


recorded?

3.1 Are SPT blow count, percent


core recovery, and RQD
values shown?

CHK 13D-1 - 2/3


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13D-1 - RESULTS OF SOIL INVESTIGATION

YES NO N/A REMARKS

3.2 If cone penetration test were


made, are plots of cone
resistance and friction ratio
shown with depth?

4.0 Laboratory Test Data:

4.1 Were lab soil classification


tests such as natural moisture
content, gradation, Atterberg
limits, performed on selected
representative samples to
verify visual soil identification?

4.2 Are laboratory test results


such as shear strength,
consolidation, etc., included
and/or summarized?

CHK 13D-1 - 3/3


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST13D-2 - CENTRELINE CUTS AND EMBANKMENTS


(FOR NORMAL GROUND)
Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 Is the following information provided?

1.1 Existing surface and


subsurface drainage?

1.2 Evidence of spring and


excessively wet areas?

1.3 Slides, slump and faults noted


along the alignment?

2.0 General Soil Cut or Fill :

2.1 Specific surface/subsurface


drainage recommendations?

2.2 Excavation limits of unsuitable


materials?

2.3 Erosion protection measures


for back slope, side slopes and
ditches including riprap
recommendations or special
slope treatment?

2.4 Is the slope design limited to


maximum 6 nos of berm?

3.0 Fill Slopes / Embankments :

3.1 Is fill slope design 1:2 with


minimum 2.0m berm width and
maximum 6.0m berm height?

CHK 13D-2 - 1/3


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST13D-2 - CENTRELINE CUTS AND EMBANKMENTS


(FOR NORMAL GROUND)
Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results

YES NO N/A REMARKS

3.2 Will untreated fill slope design


provide minimum FOS=1.25?

3.3 Special usage of fill slope


stabilization (such as
geogrid/geotextiles
reinforcement, reinforced
concrete retaining structure,
reinforced fill structure,
replacing the fills with elevated
structures)? If YES, please
states the method used.

3.4 Are reinforced/stabilized fill


slopes for minimum FOS=1.5?

4.0 Soil Cuts :

4.1 Is cut slope designed 1:1.5 to


1:2 with minimum 2.0m berm
width and maximum 6.0m berm
height?

4.2 Are untreated cut slopes


designed for minimum
FOS=1.25?

4.3 Special usage of excavated


soils (such as soil nailing with
slope surface
protection/guniting, permanent
ground anchors, retaining wall,
etc)? If YES, please states the
method used.

4.4 Estimated shrink-swell factors


for excavated materials?

CHK 13D-2 - 2/3


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST13D-2 - CENTRELINE CUTS AND EMBANKMENTS


(FOR NORMAL GROUND)
Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results

YES NO N/A REMARKS

4.5 Are reinforced/stabilized cut


slopes designed for minimum
FOS=1.5?

5.0 Rock Slopes :

5.1 Rock slope design 4:1 with


minimum 2.0m berm width and
maximum 6.0m berm height?

5.2 If answer to 16 is NO, are rock


slope designed based on
orientation of major rock
jointing?

5.3 Is the need for special rock


slope stabilization measures,
e.g., permanent rock anchors,
rock dowels, rock bolting,
rockfall catch ditch, wire mesh
slope protection, shotcrete,
rock bolts, addressed?

5.4 Have effects of blast induced


vibrations on adjacent
structures been evaluated?

CHK 13D-2 - 3/3


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13D-3 - EMBANKMENTS OVER SOFT GROUND


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
Where embankments must be built over soft ground (such as soft clays, organic silts or peat),
stability and settlement of the fill should be carefully evaluated.
YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 Embankment Stability :

1.1 Has the shear strength of the


foundation soil been
determined from lab testing
and/or field vane shear or cone
penetrometer tests?

1.2 Has the bearing capacity of the


embankment been evaluated
for min FOS=1.4 (short term)?

1.3 Has the stability of the


embankment been evaluated
for minimum FOS=1.3 (short
term) and FOS=1.2(long
term)?

1.4 If the proposed embankment


does not provide minimum
factors of safety given above,
are recommendations given or
feasible treatment alternates,
which will increase factor of
safety to minimum acceptable
(such as change alignment,
lower grade, use stabilizing
counterberms, excavate and
replace unsuitable material,
lightweight fill, geotextile fabric
reinforcement, etc)? If YES,
please states the alternative
used.

CHK 13D-3 - 1/5


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13D-3 - EMBANKMENTS OVER SOFT GROUND


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
Where embankments must be built over soft ground (such as soft clays, organic silts or peat),
stability and settlement of the fill should be carefully evaluated.
YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.5 Are technical-cost-time-


constructibility comparisons of
treatment alternates given and
a specific alternate
recommended? If YES, please
list out the treatment
alternates.

2.0 Fill Slopes / Embankments :

2.1 Have consolidation properties


of fine-grained soils been
determined from laboratory
consolidation test?

2.2 Have the settlement of


embankments over soft ground
follow the design criteria below
:

5 years post construction :


▪ Within 50m from structures approach < 100mm Differential
▪ Within 100m remote from structures < 150mm Settlement
▪ Road < 250mm (Total settlement)

2.3 Have the settlement of


embankment over soft ground
designed for 90% consolidation
settlement during construction?

CHK 13D-3 - 2/5


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13D-3 - EMBANKMENTS OVER SOFT GROUND


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
Where embankments must be built over soft ground (such as soft clays, organic silts or peat),
stability and settlement of the fill should be carefully evaluated.
YES NO N/A REMARKS

2.4 For bridge approach


embankments, are
recommendations made to get
the settlement out before the
bridge abutment is constructed
(stage construction, surcharge,
pile embankment, PVD, etc)? If
YES, please states the
recommendation made.

2.5 If geotechnical instrumentation


is proposed to monitor fill
stability and settlement, are
detailed recommendations
provided on the number, type
and specific locations of the
proposed instruments?

3.0 Ground Improvement Techniques :

3.1 For PVD, do recommendations


include the coefficient of
consolidation for horizontal
drainage, ch, and the length
and spacing of PVD?

3.2 For lightweight fill/EPS, do


recommendations include the
material properties (f,c,g),
permeability, compressibility
and drainage requirements

CHK 13D-3 - 3/5


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13D-3 - EMBANKMENTS OVER SOFT GROUND


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
Where embankments must be built over soft ground (such as soft clays, organic silts or peat),
stability and settlement of the fill should be carefully evaluated.
YES NO N/A REMARKS

3.3 For vibro-compaction, do the


recommendations include
required degree of
densification (e.g., relative
density, SPT blow count, etc),
settlement limitations and
quality control?

3.4 For dynamic compaction, do


the recommendation include
required degree of
densification (e.g. relative
density, SPT blow count, etc),
settlement limitations and
quality control?

3.5 For stone columns, do the


recommendations include
spacing and dimensions of
columns, bearing capacity,
settlement characteristics and
permeability (seismic
applications)?

3.6 For grouting do the


recommendations include the
grouting method (permeation,
compaction, etc), material
improvement criteria,
settlement limitations and
quality control?

CHK 13D-3 - 4/5


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13D-3 - EMBANKMENTS OVER SOFT GROUND


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
Where embankments must be built over soft ground (such as soft clays, organic silts or peat),
stability and settlement of the fill should be carefully evaluated.
YES NO N/A REMARKS

4.0 Construction Considerations :

4.1 If excavation and replacement


of unsuitable shallow surface
deposits (peat, muck, top soil)
is recommended, are vertical
and lateral limits of
recommended excavation
provided?

4.2 Where a surcharge treatment


is recommended, are plan and
cross-section of surcharge
treatment provided in
geotechnical report for benefit
of the roadway designer?

4.3 Are instructions or


specifications provided
concerning instrumentation, fill
placement, rates and estimated
delay times for the contractor?

4.4 Are recommendations provided


for disposal of surcharge
material after the settlement
period is complete?

4.5 If answer for #19 is YES, the


method used is :
a. Asaoka method.

b. Hyperbolic method.

c. Others.

CHK 13D-3 - 5/5


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13D-4 - RETAINING STRUCTURES


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 Is the following information provided?

1.1 Recommended soil strength parameters


and groundwatr elevations for use in
computing wall design lateral earth
pressures and factor of safety for
overturning, sliding and external slope
stability.

1.2 Are acceptable reasons given for the


choice and/or exclusion of certain wall
types?

1.3 Is an analysis of the wall stability included


with minimum acceptable factors of safety
against :

a. Overturning with FOS ≥ 1.8

b. Sliding with FOS ≥ 1.6

c. Bearing with FOS ≥ 2.0

d. Global slope stability with FOS ≥ 1.5

1.4 If wall will placed on compressible


foundation soils, are these informations
given?

a. Estimated total settlement.

b. Differential settlement.

c. Time rate of settlement.

1.5 Will wall types selected for compressible


foundation soils allow differential
movement without distress?

CHK 13D-4 - 1/2


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13D-4 - RETAINING STRUCTURES


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS
1.6 If wall allow to move, are these
requirement follows?

a. Max permissible vertical movement


15mm along face of wall.

b. Max permissible lateral movement


15mm along face of wall.

c. Max permissible differential movement


1:150 along face of wall.

1.7 Are the external and internal stability


of retaining wall design as per BS 8006
requirement?

1.8 Are wall drainage details, including


materials and compaction provided?

2.0 Construction Considerations :

2.1 Are excavation requirements covered


including safe slopes for open excavations
or need for sheeting or shoring?

2.2 Fluctuation of groundwater table?

2.3 For soil nail and anchor walls are the


following included in the report?
a. Design soil parameters : f, c, g

b. Monimum bore size (soil nail)?

c. Design pullout resistance (soil nails)?

d. Ultimate anchor capacity (anchors)?

e. Corrosion protection requirements?

CHK 13D-4 - 2/2


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13D-5 - STRUCTURE FOUNDATION


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 STRUCTURE FOUNDATIONS - DRIVEN PILES

1.1 Is the recommended pile type given


(displacement, non-displacement, steel
pipe, concrete, H-Pile, etc.) with valid
reasons for choice and/or exclusion?

1.2 Is the recommended pile


type(s) to be the most suitable and
economical?

1.3 Are estimated pile lengths and


estimated tip elevations is stated for the for
the recommended allowable pile design
loads?

1.4 Is the recommended


design loads to be reasonable?

1.5 Has pile group settlement been


estimated (only of practical significant for
friction pile groups ending in cohesive
soil)?

1.6 If a specified or minimum pile tip


elevation is recommended, is clear
reasons given for the required tip
elevation, such as underlying soft layers,
scour, downdrag, pile uneconomically
long, etc,?

1.7 Has design analysis (wave equation


analysis) verified that the recommended
pile section can be be driven to the
estimated or specified tip elevation without
damage (especially applicable where
dense gravel-cobble-boulder layers or
other obstructions have to be penetrated)?

CHK 13D-5 - 1/6


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13D-5 - STRUCTURE FOUNDATION


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.8 Where scour piles are required, have


pile design and driving criteria been
established based on mobilizing the full
pile design capacity below the scour zone?

1.9 Where lateral load capacity of large


diameter piles is an important design
consideration, are p-y curves (load vs.
deflection) or soil parameters given in the
geotechnical report to allow the structural
engineer to evaluate lateral load capacity
of all piles?

1.10 For pile supported bridge abutments


over soft ground:

a. Has abutments downdrag load been


estimated and solutions such bitumen
coating been considered in design? Not
generally required if surcharging of the fill
is being performed.

b. Is bridge approach slab recommended


to moderate differential settlement
between bridge end and fill?

c. If the majority of subsoil settlement


will not be removed prior to abutment
construction (by surcharging), has
estimate been made of abutment rotation
that can occur due to lateral squeeze of
soil subsoil?

d. Does the geotechnical report specially


alert the structural designer to the
estimated horizontal abutment movement?

CHK 13D-5 - 2/6


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13D-5 - STRUCTURE FOUNDATION


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.11 If bridge project is large, has pile load


test program been recommended?

1.12 For major structure in high seismic risk


area, has assessment been made of
liquefaction potential of foundation soil
during design earthquake (only loose
saturated sands and silts are susceptible
to liquefaction)?

Construction Considerations

1.13 Pile driving detail such as: boulders or


obstructions which may be encountered
during driving; need for preaugering,
jetting, spudding; need for pile tip
reinforcement; driving shoes, etc?

1.14 Excavation requirements: safe slope for


open excavation; need for sheeting or
shoring; fluctuation of groundwater table?

1.15 Have effects of pile driving operation on


adjecent structures been evaluated such
as protection againts damage caused by
footing excavation or pile driving
vibrations?

1.16 Is preconstruction condition survey to be


made of adjecent structures to prevent
unwarranted damage claims?

1.17 On large pile driving projects, have


other methods of pile driving control been
considered such as dynamic testing or
wave equation method analysis?

CHK 13D-5 - 3/6


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13D-5 - STRUCTURE FOUNDATION


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.18 Is the pile settlement follows these criteria

▪ Max 12.5mm along axis of pile at pile


head at design load.
▪ 38mm or 10% pile size at pile head
at twice design load.
▪ Residual setllement at working load
not exceed [(diameter of pile or
diagonal width for non-circular pile
/120) + 4]mm whichever is the lower
value

2.0 STRUCTURE FOUNDATIONS - DRILLED SHAFTS

2.1 Are recommended shaft diameter(s) and


length(s) for allowable design loads based
on an analysis using soil parameters for
side friction and end bearing?

2.2 Settlement estimated for recommeded


design load?

2.3 Where lateral load capacity of shaft is


an important design consideration, are p-y
(load vs deflection) curves or soils data
provided in geotechnical report that will
allow structural engineer to evaluate lateral
load capacity of shaft?

2.4 Is static load test (to plunging failure)


recommended?

2.5 Are the FOS of individual pile resistance


(under axial loads) design as below:
a. Shaft Resistance FOS = 2.0
b. Base Resistence FOS = 2.0

CHK 13D-5 - 4/6


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13D-5 - STRUCTURE FOUNDATION


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS

2.6 Are the FOS of individual pile resistance


(under lateral & bending loads
perpendicular to axis of pile) design as
below:

a. Ultimate Resistance FOS = 2.5

2.7 Are the FOS of group pile capacity


design as below:
a. Block bearing Capacity FOS = 2.0

Construction Considerations

2.8 Have construction methods been


evaluated, i.e., can less expensive dry
method or slurry method be used or will
casing be required?

2.9 If casing will be required, can casing


be pulled as shaft is concreted (this can
result in significant cost saving on very
large diameter shafts)?

2.10 If artesian water was encountered in


explorations, have design provissions
been included to handle it (such as by
requiring casing and tremie seal)?

2.11 Will boulders be encountered? (if


boulders will be encountered, then the use
of shafts should be seriously questioned
due to construction installation difficulties
and resultant higher cost to boulders can
cause.)

2.12 Is the pile settlement follows these criteria

a. Max 12.5mm along axis of pile at pile


head at design load.

CHK 13D-5 - 5/6


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13D-5 - STRUCTURE FOUNDATION


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS

b. 38mm or 10% pile size at pile head


at twice design load.

c. Residual setllement at working load


not exceed [(diameter of pile or
diagonal width for non-circular pile
/120) + 4]mm whichever is the lower
value

CHK 13D-5 - 6/6


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13D-6 - GROUND IMPROVEMENT


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS

1. For wick drains, do recommendation


include the coefficient of consolidation for
horizontal drainage, ch, and the length and
spacing of wick drains?

2. For lightweight fill, do recommendations


include the material properties ( f, c, g),
permeability, compressibility, and drainage
requirements?

3. For vibro compaction, do the


recommendations include required degree
of densification (e.g: realtive density, SPT
blow count, etc.), settlement limitations,
and quality control?

4. For dynamic compaction, do the


recommendations include required degree
of densification (e.g: realtive density, SPT
blow count, etc.), settlement limitations,
and quality control?

5. For stone column, do the


recommendations include spacing,
diameter & depth of columns, bearing
capacity, settlement characteristics, and
permeability?

6. For grouting, do the recommendations


include the grouting method (permeation,
compaction, etc.), material improvement
criteria, settlement limitations, and quality
control?

CHK 13D-6 - 1/1


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13D-7 - GEOTECHNICAL DRAWINGS


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS
1.0 General :
1.1 Has the appropriate geotechnical engineer
reviewed the drawing to ensure that the
design and construction recommendations
have been incorporated as intended and
that the subsurface information has been
presented correctly? This is absolutely
necessary!

1.2 Are the finished profile exploration logs


and locations included in the plans?

1.3 Have geotechnical designs prepared by


designer been reviewed and aproved by
the Senior Geotechnical Engineer?

2.0 Centreline Cuts and Embankments :


2.1 Where excavation is required, are
excavation limits and description of
unsuitable organic soils shown on the
plans?

2.2 Are special provisions included for fill


materials requiring special treatment, such
as nondurable shales, lightweight fill, etc?

2.3 Are special provisions provided for any


special rock slope excavation and
stabilization measures called for in plans,
such as controlled blasting, wire mesh
slope protection, rock bolts, shotcrete, etc?

3.0 Embankments Over Soft Ground :


3.1 Where excavation is required, are
excavation limits and description of
unsuitable soils clearly shown on the
plans?

CHK 13D-7 - 1/2


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13D-7 - GEOTECHNICAL DRAWINGS


Notes : Preliminary design based on field SI results
YES NO N/A REMARKS

3.2 Where settlement waiting period will be


required, has estimated settlement time
been stated in the special provisions to
allow contractor to fairly price the project?

3.3 If instrumentation will be used to control


the rate of fill placement, do special
provisions clearly spell out how this will be
done and how the readings will be used to
control the contractor's operation?

4.0 Embankments Over Soft Ground :


4.1 Are limits of required selected backfill
zones clearly detailed on the plans?

4.2 Are excavation requirements sepcified,


e.g., safe slopes for excavations, need for
sheeting, etc.?

4.3 Is R.O.W limit or easements shown on


plans where anchors are to be installed?

4.4 For soil nail and anchor walls are following


included in the provisions :
a. Construction tolerances?

b. Minimum drill-hole size?

c. Material requirements?

d. Load testing procedures and


acceptable criteria?

e. Construction monitoring requirements?

CHK 13D-7 - 2/2


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13E - BRIDGE

YES NO N/A REMARKS


1.0 DETAIL DESIGN

1.1 General Requirement

i. Functionality

ii. Constructability

iii. Safety

iv. Maintainability, Accessibility and


Serviceability

v. Environment Impact Assessment

v. Aesthetic

1.2 Approval from Relevant Authority

i. Waterway(JPS, Jabatan Laut, Jabatan


Perikanan, etc)

ii. Roadway & Viaduct (JKR Federal/


State, LLM, local authority)

iii. Railway (Jabatan Keretapi, KTMB,


Monorel, ERL, etc)

iv. Others

1.3 Design Calculation

i. Structural analysis

ii. Design calculation of critical member

iii. Other components

CHK 13E - 1/2


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13E - BRIDGE

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.4 Detail Drawings

i. Configuration and geometry

ii. Reduced levels

iii. Foundation system

iv. Superstructure

v. Substructure

vi. Bridge accessories detailing

vii. Drainage

viii. Approach road

ix. Builder's work in connection with


services
x. Others

1.5 Method of Construction (where relevant)

1.6 Method statements for construction


specialist work (where relevant)

2.0 FINAL DESIGN REVIEW

i ICE Report /Internal Checker's Report

ii. Designer's Response

iii. Final Checker's Acceptance

CHK 13E - 2/2


Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13F - ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT REVIEW

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1. Fill up SPB Forms JKR.PK(O).04E-3


Kajian Semula Alam Sekitar bagi item
4.0 hingga 5.0

CHK 13F - 1/1


Project Title Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13G - ELECTRICAL WORKS

YES NO N/A REMARKS


1.0 Existing Road Lighting

1.1 Type of Column

1.2 Mounting Height

1.3 Wattage of lantern/luminaire

1.4 Type of Lamp/light source

1.5 Indicate: Relocate/ dismantle

1.6 Source of Supply

1.7 Location of Existing FP

2.0 Road Lighting System (LS-20)

2.1 Input from road designer

a. Road furniture layout

b. Cross section of road


- lighting column location

2.2 Input from KJEN, local council / municipal

a. Requirement from maintenance office

b. List of spare parts


- features of the controller

c. Confirmation on electricity bill paymaster


(Federal Road = KJEN, State Road = JD)

d. Special requirement of Local council /


municipal ( MPHTJ, MBMB ,MBJB etc)

CHK 13G - 1/9


Project Title Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13G - ELECTRICAL WORKS

YES NO N/A REMARKS

e. Declaration / agreement for electricity


bill from local council

2.3 Confirmation on source of electrical supply


(TNB/SESB/SESCO)

2.4 Proposed Design:


a. Choice of Lighting Class as per MS 825
and BS EN 13201-3

b. Choice of Luminaire

2.5 Tunnel/Underpass Lighting

a. Length (m)

b. No. of lanes

c. Width of Tunnel/ underpass

d. Height of Tunnel/ underpass

e. Design/ Drawing provided

f. Schematic: alternate circuit

g. Separate DB

h. Emergency Supply for long tunnels

j. Ventilation system

3.0 Pedestrian Bridge, Bus Stop

3.1 Fitting: vandal proof type fluorescent

3.2 Low Loss Ballast for fluorescent fitting: 6W

CHK 13G - 2/9


Project Title Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13G - ELECTRICAL WORKS

YES NO N/A REMARKS

3.3 Alternate circuit

3.4 Time switch controlled

3.5 Separate DB

3.6 Separately metered

3.7 Lightning protection system & earthing


system

3.8 Bus Stop/Bay: at least 1 no. of road lighting.

4.0 High Mast Lighting

4.1 Design/ Drawing provided

4.2 Winch System

4.3 Separate DB/FP

4.4 Lightning protection system & earthing


system

5.0 Lighting Column

5.1 Type of column

5.2 Decorative /Normal column

5.3 Frangible type column

5.4 Double slot hinged service door: Composite


fiber, embossed with 'JKR/Municipal/local
5.5 Temination box: modular type, IP54

5.6 Bitumen coated for acidic soil/ coastal area

CHK 13G - 3/9


Project Title Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13G - ELECTRICAL WORKS

YES NO N/A REMARKS

5.7 Accessories:

a. flag holder, bunting holder, hook for


festive lights,light box, pot holder, socket
outlet, cable opening, etc.

b. Pole reflective sticker : 1500mm FGL

6.0 Cabling system

6.1 Type & size of Cable: column-column


(2C/4C): ≤ 25 mm² AL Cable

6.2 Type & size of Cable: FP - column (2C/4C):


≤ 25 mm² AL Cable

6.3 Type & size of Cable: Meter


kiosk/panel/Main FP to SL FPs (2C/4C):
mm² AL Cable

6.4 Provide voltage drop calculation ( Voltage


Drop From Feeder Pillar to the last column ≤
20V)

7.0 Ducting

7.1 Location of ducting

7.2 Type of Ducting

7.3 Horizontal Direct Drilling(HDD) / Open cut /


pipe jacking

8.0 Feeder Pillar

8.1 ELR : Adjustable time delay & sensitivity

8.2 MCCB/ Switch fuse

CHK 13G - 4/9


Project Title Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13G - ELECTRICAL WORKS

YES NO N/A REMARKS

8.3 Earthing (Each FP shall be earthed)

8.4 Facilities for maintenance: Heater & Fluo.


Lamp c/w 100mA RCCB, 13A S/S/O c/w
30mA RCCB

8.5 Photo Elec.Ctrl Unit / RF Module

8.6 Location :

a. load center

b. above flood level

8.7 Lockable, Stainless Steel / Hot-dipped


galvanised/ Electrogalvanised, IP54

8.8 Separate Compartment with two separate


door

8.9 Internal pocket for document

8.10 Plinth: Duct for cable access, hollow section


to be filled with sand, anchor bolt

8.11 Paved platform for maintenance : 600mm

8.12 JKR identification stripe ( golden yellow &


black)

8.13 Anti Vandalism features:

a. 2 sets of embracing steel bars with


external padlocking facilities c/w anti
chemical, weatherproof padlock

b. Anti Sticker Paint

CHK 13G - 5/9


Project Title Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13G - ELECTRICAL WORKS

YES NO N/A REMARKS

8.14 Avoid cascading of FP. Direct from TNB


source

8.15 Type of meter panel/kiosk : centralize /


individual

8.16 Cable reticulation : type & scope

8.17 Substation: type & Location

8.18 Booster Transformer

8.19 Energy Saving Equipment / After midnight


dimming

9.0 Traffic Signal Light System ( JKR/SPJ/2008-S8)

9.1 Input from road designer

a. Layout of traffic signal location and


controller

b Traffic Phasing & Timing

9.2 Input from KJEN office

a. Information on centralize control and


monitoring system

b. List of spare part - features of the


controller

9.3 No. and type of signalised junction

9.4 Coordination Road Lighting & Traffic signal


light column

CHK 13G - 6/9


Project Title Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13G - ELECTRICAL WORKS

YES NO N/A REMARKS

9.5 Signal Heads ( MS 2478:2012):

a. Signal head arrangement ( Standard


drawing)

b. Height of Signal head (min 2.5m,


max 3.5m above the carriageway level,
5.5m≤ Overhead ≥6.5/8.5m above
carriageway)

c. Type of signal head ( full moon/arrow


head/ flashing amber)

d. Fully Vehicle Actuated

9.6 Pedestrian Crossing

a. Pedestrian push button

b. Signal head c/w count down & Buzzer

9.7 Traffic signal Pole :

a. Type of pole

b. Height of Pole

c. Alternate Band: Black And Orange

d. Pit at each traffic light pole

e. Cable Pit size

9.8 Cabling:

a. Schematic Diagram of Controller

CHK 13G - 7/9


Project Title Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13G - ELECTRICAL WORKS

YES NO N/A REMARKS

b. Dedicated Circuit for each signal pole


(Controller to Signal head/ Loop Detector).

c. Power Cable (Controller to Pole (Aspect)):


Multicore PVC/SWA/PVC (5C, 9C, 12C,
15C, 19C, etc)

d. Loop Cable (Signal Cable): 50 strands


UV heat resistance

e. Detector loop for each lane

f. Distance from stop lane

g. Detector Loop Pit

h. Detector Pit Size

9.9 Controller:

a. Microprocessor based

b. Separate Compartment with two


separate doors

c. Type of enclosure

d. ELR : Adjustable time delay & sensitivity,


with/without auto reclosure

e. MCCB/ Switch fuse

f. Earthing (Each F/P shall be earthed)


< 1ohm

g. Surge protection device

CHK 13G - 8/9


Project Title Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 13G - ELECTRICAL WORKS

YES NO N/A REMARKS

h. Controller: Lockable Weatherproof


Housing (IP55)

9.10 Anti Vandalism features:

a. 2 sets of embracing steel bars with


external padlocking facilities c/w anti
chemical, weatherproof padlock

b. Grilled

c. Anti Sticker Paint

CHK 13G - 9/9


Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 14 - RSA STAGE 3

YES NO N/A REMARKS


INFORMATION REQUIRED TO BE GIVEN TO AUDITOR

1. Audit Report and decisions on earlier


stage audits

2. Locality plan showing road network and


general topographic details in the region of
the project

3. Statement of Design Criteria

4. Relevant traffic demand information

5. Horizontal and Vertical Alignment Plans

6. Cross sections

7. Grading and Drainage plans showing the


location and general details of drainage
structures

8. Bridge layout plans including cross


sections and details of barrier systems

9. Interchange and / or intersection layouts

10. Traffic signal layout and design information

11 Traffic signing and road marking plans

12. Street lighting layouts and design information

13. Landscaping and beautification plans and


tree planting details

14. Plans showing relevant overhead


services/utilities

15. Traffic Management Plan

CHK 14 - 1/2
Project Title : Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 14 - RSA STAGE 3

YES NO N/A REMARKS

REPORT TO BE PREPARED BY DESIGNER AS PART OF RSA PROCESS


(refer to flowchart RSA Stage 3 Process)

16. Designer's Response Report

17. Designer's Compliance Report

CHK 14 - 2/2
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 15 - LAND ACQUISITION SECTION 8

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 Cadastral plan and certified plan


gathered

2.0 Determination of the proposed Right of


Way (ROW) and area acquired

2.1 Sufficient buffer zone provided between


slope edge to proposed ROW

2.2 ROW take into account replacement of local


access (if any)

2.3 ROW take into account the future access of


each individual lot

2.4 Acquisition area has considered the existing


government land/reserve (eg. Existing road
reserve)

2.5 ROW take into account the non productive


land after acquisition

2.6 ROW take into account the splitting of


existing land into pieces

3.0 Mukim and Daerah boundary defined

4.0 Drawing presentation

4.1 Index drawing prepared

4.2 Drawing scale as per agreed by state


JKPTG

4.3 Drawings are legible

4.4 Road centerline with chainage and


horizontal IP data shown

CHK 15 - 1/3
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 15 - LAND ACQUISITION SECTION 8

YES NO N/A REMARKS

4.5 ROW line with proper line type shown

5.6 Mukim and Daerah boundary line with


proper line type shown

4.7 Lot line and number clearly shown

4.8 State Cassini coordinate system being


adopted

4.9 ROW IP points shown on both sides of the


carriageway where details coordinates
stated on the schedule (State Cassini)

4.10 Standard sheet number shown

4.11 Acquisition schedule for the affected lots


(subject to format required by JKPTG)

a. Lot number

b. Certified Plan (CP) number

c. Mukim and Daerah

d. Area of the existing lots

e. Area to be acquired

f. Remaining area of the lots at both side of


carriageway

g. Type and number of affected


building/structure shown

h. .............................................................

CHK 15 - 2/3
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 15 - LAND ACQUISITION SECTION 8

YES NO N/A REMARKS

j. Summary of acquisition area (subject to


format required byJKPTG)
i. Overall private land to be acquired

ii. Overall government land to be


acquired
iii. Overall building affected

iv. Overall acquisition area

v. ............................................................
.
k. Plan coloured with colour scheme as
directed by JKPTG

i. Private lot to be acquired as road


reserve

ii. Government lot to be acquired as


road reserve

iii. Existing road reserve within ROW

l. Legend is shown

m. Drawings endorsed by Consultant

n. Drawings endorsed by the licensed


surveyor
p. Drawings endorsed by client or
implementation agency (eg. JKR)

5.0 Copy of land title search for efected lots


submitted

6.0 Appropriate copies prepared as directed by


the JKPTG

CHK 15 - 3/3
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 16 - FINAL DESIGN REPORT

YES NO N/A REMARKS


1.0 Introduction

1.1 Purpose of project

1.2 Background & project brief

1.3 Scope of project

2.0 Technical proposal

2.1 Methodology

2.2 Program

2.3 Main technical

2.4 Traffic studies

2.5 EIA

2.6 Scope of Survey & SI

2.7
Manual of maintenance & operation

3.0 Design Checklist/Certification

4.0 Geometric & Pavement Design Report,


Calculation & Analysis

5.0 Drainage Design Report, Calculation &


Analysis

6.0 Geotechnical Design Report, Calculation


& Analysis

7.0 Bridge / Structure Design Report,


Calculation & Analysis

CHK 16 - 1/2
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 16 - FINAL DESIGN REPORT

YES NO N/A REMARKS

8.0 EMP Design Report, Calculation &


Analysis

9.0 Road Safety Audit Report

10.0 Electrical Works Design Report,


Calculation & Analysis

11.0 Services / Utilities Relocation

12.0 Material Source Study Report

12.0 Land Acquisition Report

13.0 List of Drawings

14.0 Bill of Quantities & Taking Off

CHK 16 - 2/2
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 17 - PREPARATION OF TENDER DOCUMENT (CONVENTIONAL)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

1.0 CHECKLIST FOR TENDERERS (which shall not form part of the
Tender Document

1.1 Notice of Invitation to tender

i) Amount of tender document (RM)

ii) Place, Date and time of submission of tender

iii) Notice to Tenderers for breaching the rules

1.2 Checklist for Content of Tender Document

1.3 Submission checklist for the use of Tenderers

1.4 Tenderer's Information Forms

Borang A - Surat Pengakuan Kebenaran Maklumat Dan


Keesahan Dokumen Yang Dikemukakan
Oleh Petender

Borang B - Maklumat Am Dan Latar Belakang


Petender

Borang C - Data-Data Kewangan

Borang CA - Laporan Bank/Institusi Kewangan Mengenai


Kedudukan Kewangan Petender

Borang D - Rekod Pengalaman Kerja

Borang E - Kakitangan Teknikal

Borang F - Keempunyaan Loji Dan Peralatan


Pembinaan Utama

Borang G - Senarai Kerja Kontrak Semasa

CHK 17 - 1/11
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 17 - PREPARATION OF TENDER DOCUMENT (CONVENTIONAL)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

Borang GA - Laporan Penyelia Projek Atas Prestasi Kerja


Semasa Petender (Bukan Projek JKR)

Borang GA1 - Laporan Jurutera Projek Atas Prestasi


Kerja Semasa Petender

Borang H - Sijil SCORE dari CIDB

1.5 Checklist for 'Dokumen Wajib'.

1.6 Bank Guarantee Forms / Insurance Guarantee for


Performance Bond

1.7 Advance Payment Guarantee Forms / Insurance


Guarantee for Advance Payment

1.8 Bank Guarantee Forms For Design Guarantee

1.9 List of Drawings

1.10 List of drawings which given for Tenderers

1.11 Tender Document

2.0 TENDER DOCUMENT/TENDER TABLE DOCUMENT

2.1 COVER FOR TENDER DOCUMENT


Standard Colour is Yellow
- Autofinish Golden Yellow (ICI 456) or equivalent

Ensure the following information of Tender Document's Covers :-

a) Coat of arms of Malaysia (Jata Negara)

b) Name of "Kerajaan Malaysia"

c) Name of "Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia"

CHK 17 - 2/11
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 17 - PREPARATION OF TENDER DOCUMENT (CONVENTIONAL)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

d) Word of "Dokumen Tender"

e) Ensure the Project Title similar as registered in


SKALA

f) Tender registration number (if any)

g) Volume and section of Tender Document

h) JKR logo

- Month and year of tender is stated under 'JKR


Logo'.

- KPKR's address at the left bottom of tender


document's cover
KETUA PENGARAH KERJA RAYA
JABATAN KERJA RAYA MALAYSIA
JALAN SULTAN SALAHUDDIN
50582 KUALA LUMPUR
Cover Sample :

KERAJAAN MALAYSIA

JABATAN KERJA RAYA MALAYSIA

DOKUMEN TENDER

UNTUK

(NAMA PROJEK)

NO. TENDER :

SEKSYEN I/III

KETUA PENGARAH KERJA RAYA


JABATAN KERJA RAYA MALAYSIA
JALAN SULTAN SALAHUDDIN
50582 KUALA LUMPUR

JULAI 2010

CHK 17 - 3/11
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 17 - PREPARATION OF TENDER DOCUMENT (CONVENTIONAL)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

2.2 CONTENT OF TENDER DOCUMENT/TENDER TABLE DOCUMENT

SECTION 1

(A) INSTRUCTION TO TENDERERS (Use Standard)

i) Maximum completion Period (In weeks)

ii) Place and time Tender Table Document is


displayed.

iii) Office's address which issue the tender if any


discrepancies, queries and objection arises

iv) Appendices to the Instruction to Tenderers

Appendix A
a) Maximum completion period approved by
HOPT
b) Harga Inginan Jabatan

c) Sijil SCORE dari CIDB

Appendix B
Guidelines of preparation for 'environmental
management plan' by Contractor approved by
HODT

Appendix C
Dasar Pengagihan Kerja Kepada Kontraktor
Bumiputera Kelas E dan F
i) Lampiran A
Deed Of Assignment (Security For
Direct Payments To Third Party)

CHK 17 - 4/11
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 17 - PREPARATION OF TENDER DOCUMENT (CONVENTIONAL)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

ii) Lampiran B
Consent By Government For Direct
Payment To Third Party
Through Deed of Assignment

iii) Lampiran C
Surat Jaminan Tanggung Rugi
Dari Subkontraktor Kepada Kerajaan

Appendix D
Pelaksanaan Integrity Pact / Surat Akuan Pembida
i) Lampiran 1 A - Surat Akuan Pembida

ii) Lampiran 1B - Surat Akuan Pembida


Berjaya

(B) FORM OF TENDER (J.K.R 203B)

i) Use latest Form of Tender (J.K.R 203B)

ii) Project Title

iii) State the Document's Section which List of


Drawings are used for preparation of Bill of Quantities

iv) State the office's address which will received


the tender

(C) LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE (JKR 203D)

i) Use standard latest Letter of Acceptance


(JKR 203D) (pind. 1/2011)

(D) P.W.D FORM 203A (Rev. 2010)

i) Use standard latest Conditions of Contract


(P.W.D 203A) (rev 2010)

CHK 17 - 5/11
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 17 - PREPARATION OF TENDER DOCUMENT (CONVENTIONAL)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

Page 1
Fill in the following informations:-
i) Kategori, Sub Kategori and Year

ii) Paragraph A - Project's name

iii) Paragraph B - List of drawings


(as listed in section ___ )

Page 2
Clause 1(b) "Contract Documents"
Add the followings for Special Conditions to the
Conditions of Contract:-
(i) Variation In Prices Of Materials For Civil Works;
(Fill in the quantities for VOP)

(ii) …………………………………………………

Clause 1(j) "Officer Named"


Fill in the particular clauses
50, 51, 52, 53, 58, & 66;

Page 3
Clause (n) "S.O."
Fill in the Officer's Designation
Refer to 'Surat Arahan KPKR Bil. 1/2010 or
latest 'Arahan KPKR'.

Page 51 - APPENDIX 1
Clause 4.1 (a)
State the officer's designation who authorised to
approve the Variation of Works.

State the financial limit for Variation of Works


Refer to 'Surat Pekeliling Perbendaharaan
Bil. 7 Tahun 2007 dated 14 Mei 2007 and 'Surat
Arahan KPKR Bil. 5/2008 dated 24 Oktober 2008.
or the latest.

CHK 17 - 6/11
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 17 - PREPARATION OF TENDER DOCUMENT (CONVENTIONAL)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

Clause 4.1(b)
Fill in the particular clauses
50, 51, 52, 53, 58, & 66;

State the officer's designation who authorised to


take actions on the above clauses
Refer to 'Surat Arahan KPKR Bil. 1/2010 or
latest "Surat Arahan KPKR'.

Page 51 (cont')
Appendix To The Conditions Of Contract
Clause 13
Amount of Guarantee
- Fill in "RM 5% of Contract Sum"

Clause 15 - Amout of Public Liability Insurance


Fill in the amount as per circulars
- Refer 'Surat KPKR BIL.(28)dlm.JKR.KPKR:020.050/03
Klt.5 dated 9 Februari 2003

Page 52 - Date of tender closed


Clause 21.2
Fill in the date when the tender closed

Clause 28.1 - Minimum amount for interim payment


Fill in RM1000.00
- Refer 'Surat KPKR BIL.(28)dlm.JKR.KPKR:020.050/03
Klt.4 dated 15.10.2001

Clause 28.2 - Minimum amount for interim payment


Fill in RM1000.00
- Refer 'Surat KPKR BIL.(28)dlm.JKR.KPKR:020.050/03
Klt.4 dated 15.10.2001

Clause 28.6 - Period of honouring the payment


- Fill in "Thirty (30) days"

CHK 17 - 7/11
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 17 - PREPARATION OF TENDER DOCUMENT (CONVENTIONAL)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

Clause 34.4 - PC. Sums allowable to participate by main contractor


- Fill in " Only for works the Contractor has the
requisite Category & Sub Category of registration
with CIDB

Clause 40.2 - LAD


Fill in Liquidated Ascertain Damages (LAD) in %.
(refer latest BLR)
(BLR/365 days x 100% = x %)

Page 53
Clause 41.1 - Sectional Completion
a) Fill in the information of sectional completion (if
any)

b) If none, state " Not Applicable"

Clause 48.1(a) - Defects Liability Period


Fill in Twelve (12) months

(E) ADDENDUM TO THE CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT


- Addendum No. 1

- Addendum No. 2

- …………………………………………..

(G) APPENDIX 2 - SPECIAL PROVISIONS TO THE CONDITIONS


OF CONTRACT FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING WORKS
Use 'Lampiran B/CW/K-B (2008) as per
Pekeliling Perbendaharaan SPP 3/2008'

Use 'Lampiran C/ME/K-B (2008) as per


'Pekeliling Perbendaharaan SPP 3/2008'

CHK 17 - 8/11
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 17 - PREPARATION OF TENDER DOCUMENT (CONVENTIONAL)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

(H) APPENDIX 3 - GOVERNMENT MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT


OPERATORS
Slot in the divider which referred to latest
Treasury Instruction

(J) APPENDIX 4 - DESIGN GUARANTEE FORM


Slot in Design Guarantee Forms as per
Pekeliling KPKR Bil 7/2011

(K) METHOD OF MEASUREMENT & PREAMBLES TO


THE BILLS OF QUANTITIES
- Ensure the following are tally with the Bill Of Quantities

a) Unit

b) Item coverage

- Make sure each 'item coverage' has been


checked and tally with all items in BQ

(L) TENDER SUMMARY


- Use colour paper (green colour is the normal
colour been used)

- Ensure the space for Contractor's and witness


signature

(M) BILL OF QUANTITIES

BILL NO 1. - PRELIMINARIES

BILL NO 2. - SITE CLEARING AND DEMOLITION

BILL NO 3. - EARTHWORKS

BILL NO 4. - DRAINAGE

BILL NO 5. - PAVEMENT

CHK 17 - 9/11
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 17 - PREPARATION OF TENDER DOCUMENT (CONVENTIONAL)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

BILL NO 6. - ROAD FURNITURES

BILL NO 7. - GEOTECHNICAL

BILL NO 8. - STRUCTURES

BILL NO 9. - TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT &


PROTECTION WORKS

BILL NO 10. - ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT


& CONTROL

BILL NO 11. - ROUNTINE MAINTENANCE WORKS

BILL NO 12. - ELECTRICAL WORKS

BILL NO 13. - PROVISIONAL SUMS

(J) SCHEDULE OF DAYWORK RATES

(K) LIST OF DRAWINGS WHICH USED IN


PREPARATION OF BILL OF QUANTITIES

SECTION II

(A) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD


WORKS JKR2005SPJ
(used standard specification which has been
approved by HODT)
1. JKR/SPJ/2008-S8 Traffic Signal System -
SAKPKR Bil.15/2011

2. JKR/SPJ/2008-S9 Concrete - SAKPKR


Bil. 1/2011

3. JKR/SPJ/2008-S4 Flexible Pavement -


SAKPKR Bil. 14/2011

CHK 17 - 10/11
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 17 - PREPARATION OF TENDER DOCUMENT (CONVENTIONAL)

YES NO N/A REMARKS

4. JKR/SPJ/1988 whichever relevant and still


valid

Ensure the specification for the bridge works,


geotechnical works and slopes (if any) ;-

i) Prestressing works

ii) Structural Steel Works

iii) Bridge Bearings

iv) Expansion Joints

v) Parapets

vi) Slope Stabilisation

vii) Rock Stabilisation.

(B) ADDENDUM TO THE SPECIFICATION


(used addendum specification which has been
approved by HODT)

(C) SPECIAL PROVISION TO THE


SPECIFICATION
(used special provision to the secification
which has been approved by HODT)

(D) ADDITIONAL SPECIFICATION (IF ANY)

SECTION III

(A) DRAWINGS AND LIST OF DRAWINGS


- ensure the drawings and list of drawings are
senarai
similar which
di Seksyen
listed 1in Section I.

CHK 17 - 11/11
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 18 - PREPARATION OF ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE

YES NO N/A REMARKS


1.0 DOCUMENT

1.1 Use the final Bill of Quantities


concurred by HOPT

1.2 Use the following documents for reference to price the BQ :-

a. Unit price from Jabatan


Perangkaan Negara (on line
Publications for Variation of Price
material for civil engineering
works)

b. Historical data from similar and


nearest project

c. Quotation from
Suppliers/Contractors

2.0 PRICING THE BILL OF QUANTITIES

2.1 Make sure all the Bill are priced

BILL NO 1. - PRELIMINARIES

BILL NO 2. - SITE CLEARING


AND DEMOLITION

BILL NO 3. - EARTHWORKS

BILL NO 4. - DRAINAGE

BILL NO 5. - PAVEMENT

BILL NO 6. - ROAD FURNITURES

BILL NO 7. - GEOTECHNICAL

BILL NO 8. - STRUCTURES

CHK 18 - 1/3
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 18 - PREPARATION OF ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE

YES NO N/A REMARKS

BILL NO 9. - TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT &
PROTECTION WORKS

BILL NO 10. - ENVIRONMENTAL


MANAGEMENT &
CONTROL

BILL NO 11. - ROUTINE


MAINTENANCE WORKS

BILL NO 12. - ELECTRICAL WORKS

BILL NO 13. - OCCUPATIONAL


SAFETY AND HEALTH

BILL NO 14. - PROVISIONAL SUMS/


PRIME COST SUMS

2.3 Provisional Sums/Prime Cost Sums

a. Confirms the amounts of


Provisional Sums/ Prime Cost
Sums with HOPT/HODT

2.4 Checking squaring and transferring of amount

a. Rates & Amount for each items


are correct

b. Sum amount in total for each BQ


pages are correct

c. Transferred amount are correct


between BQ pages and collection
page

CHK 18 - 2/3
Project Title: Revision
Date
Designer
Checker

CHECKLIST 18 - PREPARATION OF ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE

YES NO N/A REMARKS

d. Transferred amount are correct in


collection page and summary

e. Transferred amount are correct in


summary page and grand
summary

3.0 CHECKING THE NORMS

3.1 Cross check the cost per km for roads

3.2 Cross check the cost per m2 for


bridges
* Use deck slab/tack coat area for
quick checking for the area of
bridges

CHK 18 - 3/3

You might also like