Iso 20140-1-2013
Iso 20140-1-2013
Iso 20140-1-2013
STANDARD 20140-1
First edition
2013-05-01
Reference number
ISO 20140-1:2013(E)
© ISO 2013
ISO 20140-1:2013(E)
Contents Page
Foreword......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... iv
Introduction...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................v
1 Scope.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1
2 Normative references....................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms................................................................................................................................. 1
3.1 Terms and definitions........................................................................................................................................................................ 2
3.2 Abbreviated terms................................................................................................................................................................................ 7
4 Manufacturing system and its environmental influence evaluation............................................................... 7
4.1 Product life cycle and manufacturing system life history................................................................................... 7
4.2 Manufacturing system hierarchical structure............................................................................................................ 10
4.3 Environmental influence evaluation.................................................................................................................................. 11
5 Evaluation method of environmental influence................................................................................................................11
5.1 Methodology of environmental influence evaluation.......................................................................................... 11
5.2 Unit process of manufacturing process........................................................................................................................... 12
5.3 Environmental influence.............................................................................................................................................................. 14
5.4 Environmental index evaluation........................................................................................................................................... 14
6 Evaluation process of environmental influence................................................................................................................15
6.1 Evaluation process of environmental index................................................................................................................ 15
6.2 Aggregation process of environmental influence................................................................................................... 16
6.3 Allocation/charge process of indirect/CRR influence........................................................................................ 16
7 Data for environmental influence evaluation......................................................................................................................17
7.1 General......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17
7.2 Data categories for environmental influence evaluation................................................................................. 17
7.3 Actual data in operation step.................................................................................................................................................... 18
7.4 Actual data in construction/reconfiguration and retirement step.......................................................... 18
7.5 Reference data....................................................................................................................................................................................... 18
7.6 Environmental characteristics data (ECD)................................................................................................................... 19
7.7 Existing data standards................................................................................................................................................................. 19
Annex A (informative) Activity model of manufacturing system life history and its
environmental influence............................................................................................................................................................................20
Annex B (informative) Responsibility of organization with regard to environmental influence.......29
Annex C (informative) Use cases of ISO 20140.........................................................................................................................................31
Annex D (informative) Input to/output from unit process.........................................................................................................33
Annex E (informative) Conformance classes of ISO 20140..........................................................................................................34
Annex F (informative) Structure of ISO 20140.........................................................................................................................................36
Bibliography.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 42
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular the different approval criteria needed for the
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2. www.iso.org/directives
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received. www.iso.org/patents
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
The committee responsible for this document is ISO/TC 184, Automation systems and integration,
Subcommittee SC 5, Interoperability, integration, and architectures for enterprise systems and automation
applications.
ISO 20140 consists of the following parts, under the general title Automation systems and integration —
Evaluating energy efficiency and other factors of manufacturing systems that influence the environment:
— Part 1: Overview and general principles
The following parts are under preparation:
— Part 2: Environmental index evaluation process
— Part 3: Environmental influence aggregation process
— Part 4: Allocation/charge process of indirect influence/construction, reconfiguration and retirement
(CRR) influence
— Part 5: Environmental influence evaluation data
Introduction
This part of ISO 20140 establishes an overview and general principles of a method for the assessment of
environmental influence of manufacturing systems.
ISO 20140 specifies a method for evaluating the energy efficiency of a manufacturing system and other
factors, e.g. energy consumption, waste and release, etc., that influence the environment. The evaluation
method provides guidelines to analyse the usage of energy by the manufacturing system and the effects
of the manufacturing system on the environment. ISO 20140 systematically evaluates the environmental
influence through analysing the manufacturing activities and the manufacturing system.
ISO 20140 is intended for discrete products/parts manufacturing systems, such as those used in forming,
machining, painting, assembling, testing and other manufacturing processes in the production of aircraft,
automobile, electric appliances, machine tools and their components, and other similar products.
The focused application domain of ISO 20140 is a manufacturing system that consists of the hierarchical
structure built from individual manufacturing equipment, i.e. a work unit, a work centre, an area, and
a factory. ISO 20140 provides evaluation methods for the influence on the environment, resulting from
different manufacturing system configurations and from improvements of production management and
individual manufacturing equipment operations.
The evaluation method and underlying concept of ISO 20140 can also be used as the foundation for the
environmental influence evaluation for continuous processes and/or batch processes.
ISO 20140 can be used for:
— benchmarking of environmental influence with a generic manufacturing system or between
different manufacturing systems for producing the same product,
— alternative studies of environmental influence for improving a current manufacturing process,
reconfiguring a current manufacturing system/equipment, and designing a new manufacturing system,
— setting the top level target of environmental improvement and the breakdown to intermediate
systems, work units and individual manufacturing equipment, and
— improving the shop floor operations by visualizing the actual status of environmental influence.
Expected users of ISO 20140 are:
a) managers for environmental conditions in a factory, site and enterprise;
b) engineers for process planning of products;
c) planners and designers for manufacturing systems; and
d) engineers and foremen that produce products by operating a manufacturing system.
The structure of ISO 20140 and the relationships between parts are outlined in Annex F.
1 Scope
This part of ISO 20140 establishes an overview and general principles of a method for the assessment of
environmental influence of manufacturing systems.
ISO 20140 specifies for the discrete products/parts manufacturing sectors a common foundation and
methodology for energy efficiency and other factors of environmental influence evaluation, which
enables sector specific methods to be applied in characteristic situations.
ISO 20140 enables an assessment to be made of the environmental influence of manufacturing processes,
which can be used either to seek an overall reduction in negative influence or an increase in positive results.
The evaluation method of ISO 20140 is applicable to the environmental influence of a manufacturing
system which consists of individual manufacturing equipment, and which is configured as a work unit,
a work centre, an area or a factory.
ISO 20140 specifies the requirements for the environmental influence data to be captured from the
individual manufacturing equipment, as the most granular data for aggregating along the manufacturing
system hierarchy.
NOTE The evaluation method and underlying concept of ISO 20140 can be used as the foundation for the
environmental influence evaluation for a continuous process and/or a batch process, in common with a discrete
products/parts manufacturing process.
2 Normative references
The following referenced documents, in whole or in part, are normatively referenced in this document
and are indispensable for its application. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated
references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 14040:2006, Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework
3.1.2
area
physical, geographical or logical grouping of resource (3.1.39) determined by the site (3.1.41)
EXAMPLE It can contain process cells, production units, production lines, and storage zones.
1) To be published.
2) To be published. (Revision of IEC 62264-1:2003)
3.1.9
environment
surroundings in which an organization operates, including air, water, land, natural resources, flora,
fauna, humans, and their interrelation
[SOURCE: ISO 14001:2004, 3.5, modified — Note has been deleted.]
3.1.10
environmental aspect
element of an organization’s activities or products or services that can interrelate with the
environment (3.1.9)
[SOURCE: ISO 14001:2004, 3.6, modified — Note has been deleted.]
3.1.11
environmental characteristics data
ECD
characteristics and/or performance specifications related to environmental aspect (3.1.10), both
acquired by measurement and declared by the equipment suppliers
3.1.12
environmental impact
any change to the environment (3.1.9), whether adverse or beneficial, wholly or partially resulting from
an organization’s environmental aspects (3.1.10)
[SOURCE: ISO 14001:2004, 3.7]
3.1.13
environmental index
value that represents environmental efficiency and/or environmental influence related performance or
characteristics
3.1.14
environmental influence
changes to the environment (3.1.9), whether adverse or beneficial, wholly or partially resulting from a
manufacturing system’s environmental aspects (3.1.10)
[SOURCE: ISO 14001:2004, 3.7, modified — “Environmental impact”, “any change” and “organization”
have been replaced by “environmental influence”, “changes” and “manufacturing system”.]
3.1.15
environmental influence footprint
sum of environmental influence (3.1.14) of a manufacturing system component as a product (3.1.35), used in
the construction and reconfiguration step of a manufacturing system, based on a life cycle assessment (3.1.22)
3.1.16
factory
identified physical, geographical and/or logical component within a site (3.1.41), which is an organization
with resource (3.1.39) for manufacturing products or providing services, and which is controlled by and
reports to a business unit of a manufacturing enterprise (3.1.8)
Note 1 to entry: At least one factory is located within a site.
Note 2 to entry: A factory is the highest entity of a manufacturing system within a site.
3.1.17
indirect influence
environmental influence (3.1.14) resulting from activities that support actual product production by
direct operation (3.1.5) of manufacturing equipment (3.1.29), in indirect mode (3.1.18) of manufacturing
equipment and operation and maintenance of the manufacturing support system (3.1.30)
3.1.18
indirect mode
mode of manufacturing equipment (3.1.29) to support its direct operation (3.1.5)
EXAMPLE Idle/standby mode and maintenance.
3.1.19
input
material or energy flow that enters a unit process (3.1.42)
[SOURCE: ISO 14040:2006, 3.21, modified — “Product” has been removed from definition, and Note has
been deleted.]
3.1.20
life cycle
<manufacturing system> finite set of generic phases and steps a system may go through over its entire
life history (3.1.28)
[SOURCE: ISO 15704:2000, 3.11, modified — Concept domain has been added.]
3.1.21
life cycle
<product> consecutive and interlinked stages of a product system, from raw material acquisition or
generation from natural resources to final disposal
[SOURCE: ISO 14040:2006, 3.1, modified — Concept domain has been added.]
3.1.22
life cycle assessment
LCA
<manufacturing system> compilation and evaluation of the inputs, outputs and the potential
environmental influence (3.1.14) of a manufacturing system throughout its life cycle (3.1.20)
[SOURCE: ISO 14040:2006, 3.2, modified — “Environmental impact” and “product system” have been
replaced by “environmental influence” and “manufacturing system”, and concept domain has been added.]
3.1.23
life cycle assessment
LCA
<product> compilation and evaluation of the inputs, outputs and the potential environmental impacts
(3.1.12) of a product system throughout its life cycle (3.1.21)
[SOURCE: ISO 14040:2006, 3.2, modified — Concept domain has been added.]
3.1.24
life cycle impact assessment
LCIA
phase of life cycle assessment (3.1.23) aimed at understanding and evaluating the magnitude and
significance of the potential environmental impacts (3.1.12) for a product system throughout the life
cycle (3.1.21) of the product
[SOURCE: ISO 14040:2006, 3.4]
3.1.25
life cycle influence assessment
phase of life cycle assessment (3.1.22) aimed at understanding and evaluating the magnitude and
significance of the potential environmental influence (3.1.14) for a manufacturing system throughout the
life cycle (3.1.20) of the manufacturing system
[SOURCE: ISO 14040:2006, 3.4, modified — “Impact” and “product system” and “product” have been
replaced by “influence” and “manufacturing system”.]
3.1.26
life cycle inventory analysis
<manufacturing system> phase of life cycle assessment (3.1.22) involving the compilation and
quantification of inputs and outputs for a manufacturing system throughout its life cycle (3.1.20)
[SOURCE: ISO 14040:2006, 3.3, modified — “Product” has been replaced by “manufacturing system”,
and concept domain has been added.]
3.1.27
life cycle inventory analysis
<product> phase of life cycle assessment (3.1.23) involving the compilation and quantification of inputs
and outputs for a product throughout its life cycle (3.1.21)
[SOURCE: ISO 14040:2006, 3.3, modified — Concept domain has been added.]
3.1.28
life history
actual sequence of steps a system has gone through during its lifetime
[SOURCE: ISO 15704:2000, 3.12]
3.1.29
manufacturing equipment
equipment which is operated for directly producing a product, in a manufacturing process
3.1.30
manufacturing support system
system which is used for providing the necessary other resource (3.1.32) to a manufacturing system
3.1.31
material
primary or secondary material, or intermediate product, that is used to produce a product
Note 1 to entry: Secondary material includes recycled material.
[SOURCE: ISO 14040:2006, definition 3.15, modified — “Raw material” has been replaced by “material”
as the term, and “intermediate product” has been added to the definition.]
3.1.32
other resource
input (3.1.19) other than the material (3.1.31)
EXAMPLE Energy (3.1.6); coolant and lubricant; air conditioning and lighting.
Note 1 to entry: The term “other resource” is used in order to distinguish it from such resources (3.1.39) of a
manufacturing system as manufacturing equipment (3.1.29) and manufacturing support system (3.1.30).
3.1.33
output
product (3.1.35), material or energy flow that leaves a unit process (3.1.42)
Note 1 to entry: Products and materials include raw materials, intermediate products, co-products and releases.
3.1.35
product
any goods or service
[SOURCE: ISO 14040:2006, 3.9, modified — Notes have been deleted.]
3.1.36
production line
collection of equipment dedicated to the manufacture of a specific number of products or product families
Note 1 to entry: A production line is a type of work centre.
3.1.41
site
identified physical, geographical, and/or logical component grouping of a manufacturing enterprise (3.1.8)
[SOURCE: IEC 62264‑1:—, 3.1.39]
3.1.42
unit process
most detailed activity element of a process (3.1.34) considered in the environmental influence (3.1.14)
evaluation for which input and output data are quantified
[SOURCE: ISO 14040:2006, 3.34, modified — “Smallest element” and “life cycle inventory analysis” have
been replaced by “most detailed activity element of a process” and “environmental influence evaluation”.]
3.1.43
waste
substances or objects which the holder intends or is required to dispose of
[SOURCE: ISO 14040:2006, 3.35, modified — Note has been deleted.]
3.1.44
work cell
equipment grouped together to produce a family of parts having similar manufacturing requirements
within a production line
Note 1 to entry: A work cell is a type of work unit.
[SOURCE: IEC 62264‑1:—, 3.1.45, modified — “Note 1 to entry” has been added.]
The manufacturing process for producing a product is positioned at the intersection of the product
life cycle, the manufacturing system life cycle and the business process, as illustrated in Figure 1. The
product life cycle and the manufacturing system life cycle have common life cycle stages and phases,
respectively, of design, production, operation and support, and retirement.
The product production at a factory may change depending on the change of product quantity and/or
product mix corresponding to a customer order change, starting a new production of a newly designed
or design changed product, and a manufacturing system configuration change.
The manufacturing system environmental influence at a factory may change depending on the product
production changes, and changes in process plans for producing a product, and the manufacturing
execution control, for improving the environmental influences.
Product
Manufacturing retirement
Business Process process
Product Product
Customer Production operation/
order order production
support
receive release
enabled by
Manufacturing
system
operation/
support
Manufacturing
system Manufacturing
production system/
component
Manufacturing retirement
system
design
Manufacturing system life cycle
4.1.2 Manufacturing system life history for its environmental influence evaluation
An environmental evaluation of a manufacturing system shall consider the whole life history steps of the
system in addition to its operation step where actual production is executed, as illustrated in Figure 2.
Manufacturing
process & system
Product
Manufacturing Product
Material Product operation/
process retirement
support
Enabled by
Reusable
material
Other resource Manufacturing
& energy
for equipment
direct operation direct operation
Waste &
e.g. release
energy,
coolant,
lubricant Manufacturing
Manufacturing system
equipment
in indirect mode life history
Manufacturing
support system
Manufacturing Manufacturing
system system/
construction/ component
reconiguration retirement
Material and other resources, as the input to the manufacturing process that influences the environment,
and product, reusable material and energy, and waste and release, as the output from the manufacturing
process that influences the environment, are identified in Figure 2.
NOTE 1 Neither the product design stages nor the manufacturing system design phases (identified in Figure 1)
are identified in Figure 2, because both product design and manufacturing system design are the given conditions
for the environmental influence evaluation of a manufacturing system for actual product production for realizing
the customer order under the business process.
NOTE 2 The life history concept is designed to identify the representation in time of activities, carried out
through the life history with iterative nature, specified in ISO 15704:2000, 4.2.9 and explained in ISO 15704:2000,
A.3.1.3.3, in relation to the life cycle specified in ISO 15704:2000, 4.2.8.
For environmental influence evaluation, every step of the life history of a manufacturing system shall be
identified and its actual environmental influence data shall be acquired.
The life history steps of a manufacturing system for which significant environmental influences occur are:
— construction/reconfiguration,
— operation, and
— retirement.
The operation step of a manufacturing system is comprised of the direct operation mode and indirect
mode of the manufacturing equipment, e.g. idle/standby mode and maintenance, and operation and
maintenance of the manufacturing support system. The manufacturing system retirement step includes
reuse, recycling and disposal of system components.
NOTE 3 The activities across the life history of a manufacturing system in relation to environmental influence
are studied in Annex A.
Site
Area
Work centre
(Production line)
Work unit
(Work cell)
Manufacturing
support system
Level 2 Level 2
Manufacturing Manufacturing
equipment support equipment
NOTE 1 The manufacturing system hierarchy, illustrated in Figure 3, is consistent with the role-based
equipment hierarchy specified in IEC 62264-1:—, 5.3, except that factory is identified under the site. Level n in
Figure 3 represents the corresponding Level n of the functional hierarchy level specified in IEC 62264-1:—, 5.2.1.
NOTE 2 The production line or work cell (shown in parentheses) represents a type of work centre or work unit,
respectively, for discrete production.
NOTE 3 ISO 20140 focuses on Level 3, with the interface to Level 2 and Level 4. It acquires actual data from
Level 2, receives production planning data from Level 4, and reports environmental index, as the result of
environmental influence evaluation, to Level 4 (see Clauses F.4 to F.6).
For system environmental influence evaluation, a manufacturing system boundary shall be clearly
determined. The basic object for evaluation is a process. A process can be determined at different scales or
granularity, e.g. individual manufacturing equipment, a work unit (work cell), a work centre (production
line), an area or a factory, depending on the evaluation objectives. Appropriate definitions of processes in
respective expert domains shall be referenced. By combining the input and output of several processes,
an aggregate process can be determined as a target for environmental influence evaluation.
For an environmental influence evaluation, the constituents of a process shall be the activities decomposed
to a granularity which is sufficient for a requested accuracy of the evaluation. These constituents are
unit processes in the standardized LCA method, as specified by ISO 14040, and can consist of activities
that combine several work units (work cells) or a unit process can correspond to an activity of one work
unit (work cell). The system boundary encapsulates these unit processes and externalizes their input
and output, as illustrated in Figure 4.
Manufacturing system
Manufacturing
Manufacturing construction,
equipment
support system reconiguration &
in indirect mode
retirement
Manufacturing
Other resource Other resource system component
Other resource
System boundary
of unit process
Material Manufacturing Product
process
Direct inluence
NOTE 1 The responsibility of the organizational role with regard to environmental influence, in relation to the
activities across the life history of a manufacturing system, is studied in Annex B.
Each input and output across the system boundary of the unit process concerned shall be enumerated
and evaluated for environmental influence through the manufacturing system life history steps,
as appropriate to the evaluation purpose, and shall be classified into one or more categories: direct
influence, indirect influence and CRR influence.
Illustrated in Figure 4 are sources of influence resulting from input to and output from a unit process.
These influences are divided into direct influence, indirect influence and CRR influence, with the former
shown on the horizontal axis and the latter two on the vertical axis. The direct influence is associated
with actual product production by direct operation mode of manufacturing equipment, which perform
value adding functions. The indirect influence is associated with supporting product production by
the manufacturing equipment direct operation, e.g. indirect mode of manufacturing equipment and
maintenance and operation of manufacturing support systems. The CRR influence is associated with the
long term influences due to construction, reconfiguration and retirement of the manufacturing system.
NOTE 1 Input to/output from unit process, explained in 5.2.2.2 to 5.2.2.4, are summarized in Annex D.
NOTE 2 The time models specified in ISO 22400-2:—, Clause 5, provide one means for distinguishing direct
operation from indirect mode of manufacturing equipment or indirect process activities within a work unit.
Input and output in the horizontal direction of Figure 4 are used/consumed by direct operation mode of
manufacturing equipment, which performs value adding functions, and/or are contained in the output
products. The input shall include material and other resource, and the output shall include product,
reusable material and energy, waste and release. Material shall consist of raw material and parts for
product production. Other resource for direct operation shall consist of energy and other consumed
resources for product production, e.g. coolant, lubricant. Product represents the target products for the
manufacturing system. Reusable material and energy, and waste shall consist of all input which is not
contained in the target products and release represents all releases to the environment.
Work piece in process shall consist of all existing work pieces within the boundary of the target unit
process, for a specified interval of time. Evaluation shall be performed for a specified time interval, such
as a month or a year. Some input could be instantly processed and output is generated. Some input stays
within a system boundary and could be used after some amount of time. In some cases, input material
stays within a system boundary, without any direct output, during the evaluation interval. Similarly,
output could be generated without any direct input.
In the vertical direction of Figure 4, the left and centre input and output pairs represent indirect
influence in support of manufacturing equipment direct operation. These pairs identify manufacturing
equipment in indirect mode, which may include idle/standby mode and maintenance, and operation
and maintenance of manufacturing support systems, e.g. power distribution systems, on-site power
generation, oil/water/chemicals/gas/air supply/ treatment systems, lighting and air conditioning. The
output includes waste and release.
The right side input/output pair in the vertical direction represents CRR influence that occurs
in long time intervals. CRR influence is comprised of input to/output from manufacturing
system construction/reconfiguration and retirement step. Input to the manufacturing system
construction/reconfiguration step contains manufacturing system components, carrying the
environmental influence footprint of the used system components and/or residual CRR influence of
the reused system components, and used other resources. Output from the manufacturing system
retirement step contains residual CRR influence of the reusable, recyclable and/or disposed system
components, and waste and release.
Those items specified for a unit process in 5.2.1 and 5.2.2, e.g. requirements for clear cut system boundary,
identification of input to/output from a process, and the environmental influence classification of direct
influence, indirect influence and CRR influence, shall be addressed consistently throughout every level
of the environmental evaluation of the hierarchical structure from a work unit (work cell) to the entire
manufacturing system being evaluated.
iE = ∑
unit process
iD + ∑
unit process
iI + ∑
unit process
iCRR (1)
where
iE is environmental influence;
iD is direct influence;
iI is indirect influence;
The concept of environmental efficiency, eE, expressed as a function F of system value and system
environmental influence shall be used as an index for environmental evaluation, as follows:
eE = F ( vS , iS ) (2)
where
eE is environmental efficiency;
vS is system value;
Based on this concept, appropriate functions F are elaborated by considering evaluation objectives,
production conditions and associated environmental influences. System value and system environmental
influence are measured by different units. For environmental efficiency evaluation, a reference system
is set up. A relative value of index values of a target system and a reference system is a valid evaluation
for environmental efficiency.
The explicit definition of a function F depends on respective use cases given in ISO 20140-2. For example,
one of the definitions is given as follows:
vS
eE = (3)
iS
where system value is determined as a useful physical output or added value from manufacturing system
operations, and environmental influence is calculated based on system inventory data throughout the
manufacturing system’s life history by applying the method of LCA, specified in ISO 14040. Because
system value and system environmental influence are calculated on different measures, the ratio of the
target system environmental efficiency and the reference system environmental efficiency should be
valid for evaluation.
The system value and a method for its calculation shall be explicitly specified.
NOTE 1 ISO 20140-2 provides several means for determining system value.
EXAMPLE 1 System value could be product price, product quality and features, production volume, production
lead time, and many other suitable definitions.
NOTE 2 Ideally, useful physical output or added value expresses system value. System parameters, e.g. system
availability, material usage rate (yield), are related to system value, and are likely candidates for evaluation with
respect to system environmental influence.
Useful system output directly related to system value shall be separated from other inventory data.
NOTE 3 This separation permits the itemization and differentiation of data, and facilitates quantifying the
environmental improvement of a manufacturing system.
EXAMPLE 2 Reusable material and energy, waste and release from production processes are treated separately
from the target products.
5.4.3 Basement data for life cycle inventory analysis/life cycle influence assessment
The environmental evaluation process, specified by ISO 20140-2, shall represent the basement data for
life cycle inventory analysis and/or life cycle influence assessment of a manufacturing system and life
cycle impact assessment of their output product, and/or all over their site and/or entire enterprise.
EXAMPLE Requirements and/or guidelines for that analysis and assessment are specified and/or given by
the standards for:
— life cycle assessment, greenhouse gases, carbon footprint and material flow cost accounting, developed by
ISO/TC 207 (see References [3], [5], [8], [9], [10] and [6]);
— product and/or product system design, developed by ISO/TC 207 and IEC/TC 111 (see References [2], [4],
[7] and [12]).
summary of them shall be consistent, and the evaluations and the results of the evaluations should be
associative and commutative.
NOTE A process model for specifying the method for the evaluation of environmental index, specifying
environmental efficiency and system value, is specified by ISO 20140-2 (see Clause F.4).
The environmental influence evaluation method shall be capable of ensuring the consistency of each
view summary of the manufacturing system view and the product view, by allocating the indirect
influence and charging CRR influence onto the proper direct influence element.
NOTE 1 The process model, for specifying the method for the evaluation of indirect influence and/or CRR
influence, and for the allocation of indirect influence and/or for the charge of CRR influence onto the proper direct
influence element, is given in ISO 20140-4 (see Clause F.6).
NOTE 2 The knowledge and best practice of cost accounting can be applied to ISO 20140-4, with respect to
measuring and evaluation of indirect influence and CRR influence, and to planning, calculating and offsetting of
allocation of indirect influence and/or charge of CRR influence onto the proper direct influence element.
Residual CRR influence shall be re-evaluated by following the offset result at the end of specific term of
CRR influence charge/offset process.
At the time of the retirement of obsolete system components of a manufacturing system, if the
system components are still active, or have some production capacity, and could be reused for other
manufacturing systems, residual CRR influence corresponding to this remaining capacity can be
removed from the manufacturing system evaluation if it was previously included. If the retired system
component is effectively reused for another purpose, then the corresponding part of the residual CRR
influence of the retired system component shall be subtracted from the residual CRR influence of the
original manufacturing system, and shall be carried by each system component and succeeded to the
next manufacturing system. In the case of system component retirement without reuse, the residual
CRR influence/system value of the retirement system component from its current status until the
complete expenditure of its capacity shall be subtracted from the residual CRR influence/system value
of the manufacturing system. No generally accepted procedure for active system or system component
retirement exists, therefore it shall be explicitly specified.
7.1 General
To perform an environmental influence evaluation of a manufacturing system, information concerning
manufacturing activities is necessary. By clearly defining these information data items, it is possible to
perform unambiguous environmental influence evaluation.
NOTE 1 The details of such data items, their data format and the requirements for data acquisition are specified
in ISO 20140-5.
NOTE 2 ISO 20140 can be applied in many versatile use cases, for various purposes and various concerns or
views, for environmental influence evaluation. This part of ISO 20140 specifies conformance classes, for providing
common guidelines for data classification (see Annex E).
7.2.1 General
Data categories required for environmental evaluation by capturing actual data, aggregating
environmental influence along with hierarchical structure of a manufacturing system and
allocating/charging indirect/CRR influence onto proper direct influence elements, shall include actual
environmental data elements and reference data elements.
To perform the environmental influence evaluation, the following actual data shall be collected:
— material tracking data;
— direct influence data of individual manufacturing equipment in direct operation mode;
— indirect influence data of indirect mode of individual manufacturing equipment, and operation and
maintenance of a manufacturing support system;
— CRR influence data.
To perform the environmental influence evaluation, many aspects of the manufacturing system shall
be included. To identify these aspects, a set of reference data shall be collected so that the range of
participating unit processes and their respective inputs and outputs can be determined. These reference
data shall be collected with at least the following three categories of information:
— Group 1: process plan data;
— Group 2: manufacturing process data;
— Group 3: manufacturing system data.
7.3.1 General
Actual data from individual manufacturing equipment and from manufacturing support systems shall
be collected to perform the identification of and calculation of environmental influences, as specified in
5.2.2 (see also Annex D).
7.4.1 General
Actual data from the manufacturing system construction/reconfiguration and retirement step shall be
collected to carry out identification and calculation of environmental influences, as specified in 6.3 (see
also Annex D).
Actual data of input to/output from the manufacturing system construction/reconfiguration step
shall be acquired.
Actual data of input to/output from the manufacturing system/component retirement step shall be acquired.
7.5.1 General
To perform the environmental influence evaluation, a set of reference data shall be collected so that
the range of participating unit processes and their respective inputs and outputs can be determined,
correctly aggregating environmental influence along with the hierarchical structure of a manufacturing
system, and correctly allocating/charging indirect/CRR influence onto proper direct influence elements
(see Clauses F.4, F.5 and F.6).
The following data shall be referenced to identify each process within the manufacturing process for
tracking the product view:
— the process plan data of each product at the level of parts routing.
The following data shall be referenced to identify each process within the manufacturing process for
tracking the production control view:
— the operation plan/status report of a manufacturing system;
— the production plan/status report of production control, and the execution plan/status report of
manufacturing execution.
The following data shall be referenced to identify each process within the manufacturing system hierarchy:
— the hierarchical structure of a manufacturing system;
— the specification of manufacturing equipment;
— the specification of manufacturing support systems;
— the service zone of each manufacturing support system.
Annex A
(informative)
The original IDEF0 notation is illustrated in Figure A.1 a) (corresponding to Figure 3 in the original
IDEF0 document[23]).
Material Manufacturing
Function Product
(to be processed)
Input Process/
(of Activity) Output
(to be processed)
Input data Activity
Record
An (to be processed)
An
A.2.2 Top level manufacturing process and its influence to the environment (A.0)
Figure A.2 illustrates the top level over all view of manufacturing process and its influence to the environment.
A.2.3 1st level manufacturing process and its influence to the environment (A.0-1)
Figure A.3 illustrates manufacturing process and its influence to the environment, as the 1st level
analysis, i.e. as the next to top level of Figure A.2, with three paths of:
— design product/engineer production path of A1;
— manufacturing system CRR path of A2 and A5, respectively;
— plan production/procure material and produce product (Level 1) path of A3 and A4, respectively.
A.2.4 2nd level manufacturing process and its influence to the environment (A.0-2)
The 2nd level decomposition of manufacturing process and its influence to the environment, is illustrated
in Figure A.4:
— A1 is decomposed into design product (A11) and engineer production (A12);
— A2 is decomposed into design manufacturing system (A21), construct new manufacturing system
or reconfigure current manufacturing system (A22) and resultant manufacturing system (S23);
— A3 is decomposed into plan production (A31) and procure material (A32);
— A4 is decomposed into control manufacturing execution (A41) and produce product (Level 2) (A42);
— A5 retire manufacturing system is not further decomposed.
NOTE The activity Produce Product (by operate a manufacturing system or equipment) is identified in
three levels of:
— A4: Produce Product (Level 1) (by operate a manufacturing system), in Figure A.3;
— A42: Produce Product (Level 2) (by operate a manufacturing system), under A41: Control manufacturing
execution, in Figure A.4;
— A421: Produce Product (Level 3) (by operate manufacturing equipment), in Figure A.6.
The engineer production (A12), as illustrated in Figure A.5, is decomposed into four stages of design
material (A121), plan part routing (macro process planning) (A122), design fixture and tool (A123),
define manufacturing condition (micro process planning) (A124), and prepare numerical control
program (A125).
The activities of design material (A121), plan part routing (macro process planning) (A122) and define
manufacturing condition (micro process planning) (A124) are the key components of the engineer
production (A12), by defining manufacturing process, for governing the environmental influence for
producing given designed product using current manufacturing system.
The design product (A11), as illustrated in Figure A.4, initially determines the environmental influence
required to produce that specific designed product, and that design product (A11) is requested to change
the product design for realizing the feedback from design material (A121) and plan part routing (macro
process planning) (A122) under engineer production (A12), as illustrated in Figure A.5.
The design manufacturing system (A21), as illustrated in Figure A.4, is another key player of
environmental engineering, for planning a new manufacturing system or reconfiguring current
manufacturing system/system component, which governs the environmental influence required to
produce that specific product, and that design manufacturing system (A21) is requested to change
current manufacturing system for realizing the feedback from plan part routing (macro process
planning) (A122) under engineer production (A12), as illustrated in Figure A.5.
24
Product design order for Manufacturing system Customer order
new product/ change order Production order
product design change
Material
Target
environmental
inluence
: Direct inluence,
Product design data
Product engineering
data
Material Product
Manufacturing process Product control data
and
Actual data of Actual data of Material data
its inluence to Environment
environmental environmental
inluence A0
inluence Manufacturing system/
component data
: Indirect inluence,
Supplier data of Environmental
environmental A.0-1
inluence Requirements for
inluence 1st level
maintenance plan of
Reusable Manufacturing system/
Other system component
resource component
A.0-2
Fixture / Tool 2nd level
: CRR inluence.
Manufacturing Reused
system system component
component
Figure A.2 — Manufacturing process and its influence to the environment: Top level (A.0)
: Direct inluence,
Production/ Material Produce
Product
Procure Product
Material (Level-1)
Actual data of
A3 (by Operate
environmental
Manufacturing
inluence
system)
A4
Environmental
Other
Target inluence Target
resource A4x
environmental in A.0-2 environmental
Manufacturing system inluence Fixture / Tool inluence
: Indirect inluence,
change order
: CRR inluence.
Other in A.0-2 resource
resource Reused
Mfg. system system component Reusable
component system component
Figure A.3 — Manufacturing process and its influence to the environment: 1st level (A.0-1)
ISO 20140-1:2013(E)
25
26
Product design order for Target Change cause of product production
new product/ envi. in luence
product design change (1) Design & engineering (2) Manufacturing system
(1) Design & engineering based control: ∆A based control: ∆B
Product design
based control: ∆A Design (1-1) Design & Develop (2-1) Plan new
data
Product new Product Mfg. system/
Production engineering (1-2) Change (2-2) Plan to
A11 Engineer Product design Recon igure current
: Direct inluence,
Produce
(3) Production based Material Product Production order
Product
control: ∆C Plan (Level-2)
(Deviation of Production (by Operate
mass of product/ Actual data of
Material Mfg. system)
product mix) A31 Procure environmental
data A42
Material in luence
Other Environmental
Target A32
resource in luence
environmental A.42x
in luence Fixture / Tool
Mfg. system Target
design data Mfg. system environmental
component data in luence
: Indirect inluence,
Manufacturing system Manufacturing
change order System
Retire
(2) Manufacturing system Construct Manufacturing Actual data of
based control: ∆B S23
Design new Mfg. system/ system environmental
Manufacturing Recon igure S23x in luence
Actual data of in A42x A5
environmental System curnt System Actual data of Recyclable/
in luence A21 A22 environmental Other disposed
Supplier data of in luence resource material
: CRR inluence.
environmental Other Environmental
in luence resource Mfg. system in luence Reused Reusable
component system component system component
Figure A.4 — Manufacturing process and its influence to the environment: 2nd level (A.0-2)
A125
: Direct inluence,
Change request for A124
Mfg. system (A21)
Production control
(3) Production data
based control
(Deviation of
Mass of product/
Control Target
Product mix: ΔC)
Manufacturing Env. In luence
Plan
Execution
Production
Material A41
A31 Procure data
: Indirect inluence,
Material Produce
Material Product Product
A32
: CRR inluence.
system
ISO 20140-1:2013(E)
27
28
Product Design Target
Data Environmental
Production Engineering Inluence
Data Production control
data
(3) Production
based control Control
Environmental
Manufacturing Other Inluence
system resource Target
: Direct inluence,
Requirements for
(S23) Manufacturing Env. Inl.
Maintenance plan Fixture / Tool
Equipment
Be in
C231 indirect mode of
Manufacturing
Manufacturing
support system
equipment Be in
Target (A422) idle/ stand by mode
S232 Maintain of Manufacturing
Environmental manufacturing Actual data of
Inluence equipment environmental
equipment A4222 inluence
A4221
Maintain & operate
: Indirect inluence,
Manufacturing
support system
(A423)
Environmental
Operate Inluence
Maintain
Manufacturing Other
manufacturing
support system resource
support system Actual data of
A4231
A4231 environmental
inluence
: CRR inluence.
Other
Figure A.6 — Produce products (Level 3) (A421) and its support (A422 and A423)
resource Environmental
Inluence
Annex B
(informative)
Table B.1 — Functional organizations and their responsibilities for environmental influence
Environmental in luence
Functional Activity
organization
Direct inluence Indirect inluence CRR inluence
Deine
Design Deine Deine
Manufacturing system manufacturing system &
manufacturing system manufacturing system manufacturing system
design control
(A21) capability & performance capability & performance
CRR activities
Control
Control Control
manufacturing execution n.a.
manufacturing execution manufacturing execution
Product (A41)
production Produce Control
product (Level-3) Operate
indirect mode of n.a.
manufacturing equipment
(A421) manufacturing equipment
Maintain
Manufacturing system Maintain Maintain
manufacturing equipment n.a.
maintenance manufacturing equipment manufacturing equipment
(A4221)
Table B.1 identifies the relationships between functional organizations and their responsibilities relating
to the environmental influence, as follows:
— functional organization and its responsible activity, identified in Annex A, are listed by rows;
— classes of environmental influence, such as direct influence, indirect influence and CRR influence,
are listed by columns;
— at the cross point cell of specific row and specific column, the responsibility of the functional organization
for the specific activity related to the specific class of environmental influence is identified.
The entity identified by each cell in Table B.1 as being responsible for the specific class of environmental
influence of the specific functional organization activity should contribute to the respective influence.
Annex C
(informative)
C.1 General
The use cases of ISO 20140 in this annex are identified with following two views:
— View 1: Purpose of and situations for environmental evaluation;
— View 2: Activities through manufacturing system life history.
General evaluation of a manufacturing system is done without assuming usage of particular machines
or equipment, e.g. the most environmentally efficient production method, whether to use machining
processes or to use forming processes, for a particular part can be determined.
Specific manufacturing system elements can be evaluated by referring to available specific data and
provide a precise evaluation of environmental influence in addition to productivity and cost, for better
machines or equipment selection to advance environmentally conscious production.
C.2.2.1 General
For producing specific target products, it is required to select appropriate factories or manufacturing
systems. It could be quite different, in terms of environmental evaluation, whether to produce them in
domestic factories or in foreign factories.
There could be two cases, as described in C.2.2.2 and C.2.2.3.
General evaluation of environmental influence for a certain product at the stage of manufacturing can be
done, with the result used for generic comparison of manufacturing stage influence for various products
of the same or similar category.
When producing specific target products, different factory locations, e.g. domestic or foreign, proximity
to raw materials or markets, may yield different environmental evaluation for appropriately selected
factories or manufacturing systems.
Annex D
(informative)
The inputs to and outputs from the unit process are summarized in Table D.1.
Manufacturing
Input to/output from unit process
system
support system
Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Category of
Manufacturing system
equipment
environmental
situation
in luence Input Output
Annex E
(informative)
Energy eficiency,
material eficiency and CC 3.a CC 3.1 CC 3.2 CC 3.3
hazardous substance
Energy eficiency
material eficiency,
CC 4.a CC 4.1 CC 4.2 CC 4.3
hazardous substance and
other aspects/ substance
View 1: View 2:
Views for Conformance class deinition Environmental inluence Environmental inluence
Conformance class Id
Hazardous components
Material eficiency
Indirect inluence
Energy eficiency
Direct inluence
Other aspects/
CRR inluence
components
View 1: View 2:
Environmental inluence with Environmental inluence
of concern across the MSLH
CC 1.1 Energy eficiency with Direct inluence n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
Direct inluence,
CC 1.3 Energy eficiency with indirect inluence and n.a. n.a. n.a.
CRR inluence
Direct inluence,
Energy eficiency and
CC 2.3 with indirect inluence and n.a. n.a.
material eficiency
CRR inluence
Energy eficiency,
CC 3.1 material eficiency and with Direct inluence n.a. n.a. n.a.
hazardous substance
Energy eficiency,
Direct inluence and
CC 3.2 material eficiency and with n.a. n.a.
indirect inluence
hazardous substance
Energy eficiency
material eficiency,
CC 4.1 with Direct inluence n.a. n.a.
hazardous substance and
other aspects/ substance
Energy eficiency
material eficiency, Direct inluence and
CC 4.2 with n.a.
hazardous substance and indirect inluence
other aspects/ substance
Energy eficiency
Direct inluence,
material eficiency,
CC 4.3 with indirect inluence and
hazardous substance and
CRR inluence
other aspects/ substance
Annex F
(informative)
F.1 General
This annex outlines the parts configuration, assigned role and functions of each part and interrelationships
between parts of ISO 20140.
Allocate
Evaluate Aggregate indirect inluence Acquire
environmental inluence
environmental index environmental inluence Charge data from <Level 2>
CRR inluence
Allocated Acquired
Evaluated Aggregated indirect inluence environmental inluence
environmental index environmental inluence Charged data
CRR inluence
Reference data Group-1
– Arrow represents process low of:
Reference data Group-2
: direct inluence process low,
Reference data Group-3
: indirect inluence process low,
: CRR inluence process low,
: data reference low, and
: direct inluence, allocated/charged indirect/CRR inluence, process low.
Colour and line type of rectangles represent type of subject being considered, i.e. green and solid
line represent environmental index evaluation and environmental influence aggregation along with
manufacturing system hierarchy, yellow and dashed line represent indirect influence and yellow and
chained line represent CRR influence, blue and solid line represent acquired data, blue and dot line
represent reference data, and no colour represent overview.
Summary of Report to
Part 2 speci ies Level 3 Level 4
evaluation process of
environmental index
Part 2
Environmental index
(1)at any concerned level of
evaluation process
a manufacturing system, or
(2) concerned product (group)
Acquire
actual data Acquire Acquire Acquire Acquire
from Level 2 material tracking data direct in luence data indirect in luence data CRR in luence data
Part 5
Environmental inluence evaluation data
Acquire
actual data Acquire Acquire Acquire Acquire
from Level 2 material tracking data direct inluence data indirect inluence data CRR inluence data
Use case
Position within Use case 1 Use case 2
the Hierarchical structure
of a Manufacturing system
Manufacturing system view Product (group) view
Environmental index
Environmental index
Factory <Level 4> of a product (group)
of a factory at a factory
Work area <Level 3> Environmental index Environmental index
of manufacturing process of a product (group)
Work cell <Level 3> at any intermediate level at any intemediate level
Work unit <Level 3> of a manufacturing system of a manufacturing system
Evaluate
[ Reference data - Group 1 ] Environmental index
[ Process plan data ] Part 2
Process plan of
(parts routing level) [ Reference data - Group 3 ]
each product Aggregate [ Manufacturing system & equipment data ]
environmental inluence
at a factory Hierarchical structure Service zone of
[ Reference data - Group 2 ] of each manufacturing
Level 4 manufacturing system support system
[ Manufacturing process data ]
Aggregate Speciication of Speciication of
environmental inluence
Operation plan/ manufacturing manufacturing
at any intermediate level of
status report of equipment support system
a manufacturing system
manufacturing system
Level 3
Level 4 Charge
Aggregate CRR inluence
Production plan/ on to direct inluence
environmental inluence
status report of
production control
at a unit process Part 4 (2/2)
Level 3 Level 3
Level 3
Allocate
Execution plan/ indirect inluence
status report of Aggregate on to direct inluence
manufacturing execution direct inluence
at a unit process
Part 4 (1/2)
Level 3 Level 3
Part 3 Level 3
Acquire
actual data Acquire Acquire Acquire Acquire
from Level 2 material tracking data direct inluence data indirect inluence data CRR inluence data
Reconiguration
(Construction,
& Retirement)
inluence at a unit process [ Reference data - Group 2 ]
(direct inluence
+ allocated indirect inluence Production plan/ Operation plan/
+ charged CRR inluence) status report of status report of
production control manufacturing system
Part 3 Level 3
Level 3 Level 4
Acquire
actual data Acquire Acquire Acquire Acquire
from Level 2 material tracking data direct inluence data indirect inluence data CRR inluence data
For preparing the charging process, at a specific operation term of a manufacturing system, specified by
ISO 20140-4 (2/2), CRR influence data shall be captured, evaluated and recorded, as follows:
— receive acquired CRR influence data from Level 2;
— evaluate and record CRR influence.
The charge process of CRR influence, at a specific operation term of a manufacturing system, specified
by ISO 20140-4 (2/2) is:
— plan (/offset) the charging factor within a specific term;
— charge CRR influence onto the direct influence at a unit process.
Bibliography
3) Under preparation.
4) Under preparation.
[19] ISO 20140‑4, Automation systems and integration — Evaluating energy efficiency and other
factors of manufacturing systems that influence the environment — Part 4: Allocation/charge
process of indirect influence/construction, reconfiguration and retirement (CRR) influence5)
[20] ISO 20140‑5, Automation systems and integration — Evaluating energy efficiency and other
factors of manufacturing systems that influence the environment — Part 5: Environmental
influence evaluation data6)
[21] ISO 22400‑2:—, Automation systems and integration — Key performance indicators for
manufacturing operations management — Part 2: Definitions and descriptions7)
[22] IEC 62264‑1:—, Enterprise-control system integration — Part 1: Models and terminology 8)
[23] Integration definition for function modelling (IDEF0), Draft Federal Information Processing
Standards Publication 183, 1993 December 21
5) Under preparation.
6) Under preparation.
7) To be published.
8) To be published. (Revision of IEC 62264-1:2003)
ICS 25.040.01
Price based on 43 pages