RISK MANAGEMENT-markingrubric

BMFI 3122
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
MARKING RUBRIC FOR ASSIGNMENT 1
PLEASE CIRCLE THE SCORE FOR EACH EVALUATION CRITERIA
No. Items Description Score

1. Introduction The introduction and the background are prepared comprehensively in regards to the selected 5
and title/theme. It is covering most of the important elements on the issues. The current issues are
Background also considered.
of current The introduction and the background are prepared at a satisfactory level by explaining the 4
issues selected title/theme. It is covering most of the important elements on the issues. The current
issues are also considered.
The introduction and the background are prepared very briefly or poorly with a lack of 2
explanation on the selected title/theme.
No Introduction and the background of current issues 0
2. SWOT A comprehensive SWOT Analysis with more than 5 analysis for each SWOT element. The
explanations are rational, logical and relevant with examples. 10
Analysis
A satisfactory SWOT Analysis with more than 4 analysis for each SWOT element. The
7
explanations are rational, logical and relevant with examples.
A brief SWOT Analysis with some analysis with two to three elements for each SWOT
5
analysis.
The SWOT is prepared very brief or poorly, but there is an attempt to prepare it. 2
No SWOT Analysis. 0
3 Risk A comprehensive explanation of the steps of the Risk Identification in the selected theme.
Identification The relevant multiple tools were properly used to identify the risk associated with the selected 20
title (e.g. brainstorming, expert’s opinion, checklists, lesson learnt, documentation review
etc.). The discussion is made thoroughly with relevant examples/assumptions.
A satisfactory explanation of the steps of the Risk Identification in the selected theme. The
relevant multiple tools were properly used to identify the risk associated with the selected 15
title (e.g. brainstorming, expert’s opinion, checklists, lesson learnt, documentation review
etc.). The discussion is made with examples/assumptions.
An acceptable explanation on the steps of the Risk Identification in the selected theme. The
relevant tool (1) was used to identify the risk associated with the selected title (e.g. 10
brainstorming, expert’s opinion, checklists, lesson learnt, documentation review etc.).
The Risk Identification is prepared briefly in a logical manner but with the poor use of the 5
relevant tools. The explanation is too general.
No Risk Identification 0
4 Risk Register Risk Register and Qualitative Risk Analysis are prepared comprehensively with a clear flow
and Including the probability, impact analysis. More than ten (10) risk lists were prepared. The 30
Qualitative justification for each likelihood/ occurrence for the probabilities is prepared rationally with
Risk proven evidence and clear citation/resources.
Analysis Risk Register and Qualitative Risk Analysis are prepared comprehensively with a clear flow
Including the probability, impact analysis. 10 risk lists were prepared. The justification for 25
each likelihood/ occurrence for the probabilities is prepared rationally with proven evidence
and clear citation/resources.
Risk Register and Qualitative Risk Analysis are prepared briefly with a clear flow Including
the probability, impact analysis. Less than 10 risk lists were prepared. The justification for 15
each likelihood/ occurrence for most of the probabilities are prepared rationally with
evidence.
each likelihood/ occurrence for some of the probabilities is prepared rationally with evidence.
each likelihood/ occurrence for some of the probabilities is prepared rationally with evidence.
No Risk Register and Related Analysis 0
1|Page
5 Quantitative A comprehensive and detailed quantitative risk analysis is made using relevant tools. The 20
Risk discussion is made thoroughly with relevant examples/assumptions.
Analysis A satisfactory level of quantitative risk analysis is made using relevant tools. The discussion 15
is made thoroughly with relevant examples/assumptions.
An acceptable quantitative risk analysis is made using the relevant tool. The discussion is 10
made with some examples/assumptions.
Quantitative risk analysis is prepared briefly in a logical manner but with the poor use of the 5
relevant tools. The explanation is too general.
No Quantitative Risk Analysis 0
6 Conclusion The assignment is concluded comprehensively with the related finding and lesson learnt. The 10
and suggestions based on findings are made in detail.
Suggestion The assignment is concluded comprehensively with the related finding and lesson learnt. The 7
suggestion based on the finding is made briefly.
The assignment is concluded with relevant points. 5
The assignment is concluded poorly 3
No Conclusion 0
7 Report The assignment content is arranged properly/acceptable. Tidy work and clear flow. More 5
format and than 5 references. Clean report and submitted on time
writing skills The assignment format was acceptable level. More than 3-4 references. Content is justified 3
and there are page numbers labelling.
The assignment format was arranged somewhat okay. Content is not justified and poor/no 2
page number labelling.
The assignment format was poorly arranged. Content is not justified or no page number 0
labelling. The report is prepared poorly with a late submission.
Total
-The End- prepared by Ts Dr Al Am in 2021
2|Page

RISK MANAGEMENT-markingrubric

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

RISK MANAGEMENT-markingrubric

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

RISK MANAGEMENT-markingrubric

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

BMFI 3122

MARKING RUBRIC FOR ASSIGNMENT 1

PLEASE CIRCLE THE SCORE FOR EACH EVALUATION CRITERIA

No. Items Description Score

-The End- prepared by Ts Dr Al Am in 2021

You might also like