And Using Video: Headway
And Using Video: Headway
And Using Video: Headway
Accurate knowledge of vehicle speeds and headways on trallÌc ment (such as a freeway) before this study, so there was an
networks is a fundamental part of transport systems modelling.
excellent opportunity to evaluate the system and suggest mod-
Video and recently developed automatic data-extraction tecñ-
niques have the potential to provide a cheap, quick, easy, and ifications to it. This equipment also made it feasible to inves-
accurate method of investigating traflic systems. This paper pre- tigate the relationship between vehicle speeds and location in
sents two studies that use video-based equipment to investigate the car parks.
character of vehicle speeds and headways. Investigation oÌ head-
rvays on freeway traffic allows the potential of this technology in
a high-speed environment to be determined. Its application to the
THE VIDEO SYSTEM
study ofspeeds in parking lots enabled its usefulneis in low-speed
environments to be studied. The data obtained from the video was
compared to traditional methods of collecting headway and speed Using film equipment to obtain a permanent record of vehicle
data. movements is not a new concept. However, considerable recent
developments have occurred in collecting data using video.
Digital image-processing applications offer the potential to In particular, ARRB has developed a trailer-mounted video
automate a large number of traffic surveys. It is, therefore, recording system (3). This relatively new equipment has until
not surprising that considerable interest has been directed at recently experienced only a limited range of applications. It
developing procedures for vehicle classification and number consists of a gas-operated extendible mast (with video camera
plate recognition (1 , 2). However, there appear to be several attached), a power supply, and other video accessories con-
obstacles preventing these systems from being used regularly cealed in an inconspicuous, covered trailer. A range of lenses
in traffic surveys. Some of these difficulties are the relatively is available that enable it to view various aspects and areas.
high cost of the systems, problems of accuracy, quantity of The extraction of the data from the video could be carried
data collected, and the time required to process the raw data. out by a human observer, but this is time consuming. A pref-
Fortunately, systems are being developed that can be used erable method is to extract the data automatically. A pro-
for specialized applications. This paper presents one such sys- cedure for carrying out this task has been developed by Trout-
tem. It is a video-based system that allows vehicle speed and beck and Dods (3). The position of the vehicle is recorded as
headway data to be extracted. it passes through a particular point on the screen. These points,
Video-based techniques offer the means to overcome many termed detection points, are identified in the data collection
of the difficulties of collecting information on speeds and stage. The movement of a vehicle through these points is
headways. The basic idea is to create a video recording of determined by a change in the intensity of the image and is
traffic, then extract data from it. The video approach has a recorded on computer tape for further analysis. The basics of
number of advantages including being unobtrusive and requir- VADAS are as follows. The image-processing system relies
ing a small labor component. Its major advantage is the pro- on the observation that most vehicles have a video illuminance
duction of a permanent, complete record of the traffic scene. level much greater than that of the road pavement on which
This may be reanalyzed at any stage, and provides an account they are traveling. The general luminance of the scene is
of each traffic event observed. monitored by locating a reference point just off the carriage-
The oft-quoted disadvantage of the video technique is the way. Thus, changes in ambient light levels due to cloud cover
large amount of time and effort needed for data extraction. The and the angle of inclination of the sun can be accommodated.
use of an automatic data-extraction (image processing) system Besides the reference point, VADAS allows the analyst to
can overcome this problem. The video vehicle detection system define up to L6 detection points within the video frame. The
(VADAS) (3) developed by the Australian Road Research illuminance level at each point is then monitored by VADAS,
Board (ARRB) offers a sophisticated, high-technology system and a change in luminance above a set threshold is taken to
useful in data extraction. VADAS was developed for use in mean the passage of a vehicle over that point. The basic steps
studies of the performance of unsignalized intersections, involved in data extraction using VADAS are the positioning
particularly roundabouts where complex traffic maneuvers of detection points on the screen and the adjustment of the
take place. It had not been applied to a high-speed environ- sensitivity threshold. Once the data have been logged, they
can be edited. The output from this process is a computer file
of times and detector numbers that can be used in subsequent
Department of
.Civil-Engineering, Monash University, Clayton,
data analysis. The speeds and headways can be calculated
Victoria, Australia 3168. from data on the times when vehicles were detected.
131
Taylor et al.
ern suburbs of Melbourne. The freeway section was that DATA EXTRACTION
between the Springvale Road and Wellington Road inter-
changes (Figure 1). This section has two lanes for each direc- Two methods were used to extract numerical data from the
tion of traffic flow. It was selected because of the considerable video recordings. The first was manual extraction, and the
variations in the level and quality of traffic flow and the pres- second was automatic data extraction using VADAS. The
ence of the footbridge, which provided a convenient and manual method was included to provide a basis for evaluating
inconspicuous high point to record the flow. This freeway the automatic procedure.
section represented uninterrupted traffic, with no external
influences on the flow.
This survey involved the collection of nine sets of data Manual Analysis
spanning three separate time periods on each of three days.
The first six sets were about 15 min long, while the remaining A stopwatch timer was included on the video record to assist
three sets were about 30 min long. In all, a total of about 3 in manual data extraction. The recorded tape was played at
h of traffic flow was recorded, covering traffic demand from a quarter speed. An arbitrary mark was identified on the
8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Table 1 shows reference information for the screen (e.g., a corner cube reflector or ceramic lane deline-
data sets. Only the first six data sets were used in the analysis ator). Each time a vehicle passed the mark, the time was
described in this paper. noted. Different observers watched different lanes. The whole
The data covered a wide range of medium to high flows. process took up to 90 min for 15 min of video recording. This
Young et al. (11) proposed that different models should be process required extensive manipulation and was time con-
applied to traffic under different flow regimes and that these suming. The entire processing time (not including the time
regimes could be defined in terms of the flow-density diagram subsequently spent in data analysis) exceeded 3 hr (6 person-
for a given road. They proposed three separate regimes: low, hr) per data set.
medium, and high flows.
VADAS Analysis
colored vehicles, which could trigger the detection point per- was generally attributable to the poor quality of the video
haps three times (hood-windscreen-roof). An optimum sen- camera used for the data collection. The accuracy of the
sitivity was thus chosen, on the basis that all vehicles would VADAS system has also been tested in intersection surveys
be detected. False points triggered were then detected in the with results of approximately 95 percent being obtained (3).
data-editing phase, using a series of logical tests of the time
differences between successive events at the one detection
point. The method is not perfect. Some false detections may RESULTS
still have been accepted while some genuine detections may
have been missed. However, the procedure should be at least The data extracted in this study were subjected to three
as good as manual observations based on viewing the video separate analyses: a general view of the traffic flow for each
record at normal speed. data set and each lane and an examination of lane usage
When the video signal at each detection point exceeds the characteristics.
upper and lower limits, an output is produced and read by
the VADAS microprocessor (3). A preset time delay is used
to prevent further detections at the detector. This was set at Traflic Flow Characteristics
70 ms for the freeway study to ensure that all vehicles could
be detected. This, however, led to some multiple detections, Comparisons were made of east- and westbound flows for all
as indicated above. Some problems were noted in recording nine data sets and the range of traffic flow conditions' The
motorcycles when these vehicles traveled between the detec- results of this comparison are shown in 'Iab\e 2. This tabie
tion points. shows a range of lane flows from 632 vph/lane to 1,476 vphl
The time taken to extract the data from all the video tapes lane and a range of total flows from I,420 vph to 2,676 vph-
was approximately 5 hr. This involved an initial period of An important result is the consistent observation of small
around 4 hr to set up and become proficient with the equip- minimum headways (approximately 0.3 to 0.5 sec) for single-
ment. The processing of the tapes was completed within L hr. lane flows. No distinguishable differences were found between
Obviously, if data was regularly processed using this tech- the characteristics of traffic in each flow direction. Figure 3
nology, the time required for familiarization could be sub- shows the coefficient of variation of headways plotted against
stantially reduced and the data extraction would become the traffic flow rate, with the observations scattered about the
quicker. Further time was required for editing the data. The horizontal line representing a unit coefficient of variation.
editing was carried out using a series of programs developed There is a possible suggestion of differences between lane
by Troutbeck and Dods (3). The editing for all the headway flows, with the outer (slower) lane showing coefficients typ-
data took approximately t hr. It was therefore apparent that ically less than unity, while the inner (faster) lane shows coef-
VADAS offers considerable time savings in headway data ficients generally exceeding unity. More data are needed to
collection once users become familiar with the operation of pursue this observation, but it is interesting to reflect that a
this equipment. unit coefficient of variation is one analytical property of the
The VADAS headway surveys described here were com- negative exponential distribution. A further comment on Table
pared with manual methods. The comparison indicated a 2 is the strong indication that trucks were largely confined to
VADAS accuracy level of approximately 90 percent, which the outer lane.
TABLE 2 SUMMARY DATA FOR THE HEADWAY DATA SETS FROM MULGRAVE FREEWAY
Data Set Number
Description
FuIl Carriageway
Sample size 550 356 668 364 381 375
Flow rate (vph) 2,200 1,424 2,672 1,456 r,524 1,500
Truck percentage 7.8 12.r 5.2 L1.2 9.4 8.5
Minimum headway (sec) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Maximum headway (sec) 11.5 17.4 10.i 17.9 22.O 17.8
Outer Lane
Sample size 245 198 300 204 206 209
Flow rate (vph) 984 796 1,200 820 828 840
Truck percentage 15.9 t9.l 9.7 18.5 13.0 t3.3
Minimum headway (sec) 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.5 U.J 0.6
Maximum headway (sec) 14.5 20.8 12.0 18.5 22.0 17.8
Median Lane
Sample size 305 158 368 160 175 166
Flow rate (vph) 1,220 632 1,472 640 700 664
Truck percentage 1.3 5-Z 1.6 1.9 5.1 2.4
Minimum headway (sec) 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4
Maximum headway (sec) 18.2 39.5 19.9 41 .5 40.0 45.9
t34 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1225
Distributions of Headways
ø
o Researchers have given considerable attention to headways
ì
D and suggested many theoretical distributions. The problem
o
û, {,ô
t with many of these models is that they often require complex
o iterative procedures to fit them to obse¡ved data. Rational
c subdivision and nonlinear least squares techniques have to be
.9
used, which are lengthy and at best approximate. As a result,
.9
o only the common univariate models offered in the TRAN-
STAT distribution fitting package (14) were fitted ro the head-
b o5 way data. The effort to estimate the additional parameters of
c KeY
.9
'
o left lone mixed models is justified only if they substantially improve
.9 x right lone the fit to the data. Distribution fitting using TRANSTAT
q)
a overoll suggested that the exponential model best represented head-
()o ways for the combined lanes, while the log-normal model best
represented the individual lanes. Since a large number of the
o 1000 2000 3000 headway models fitted the data to a satisfactory degree, the
Troffic f tow (q) (veh./h) mixed models, other than M3, were not investigated.
These general conclusions \À/ere not valid for all data sets,
FIGURE 3 Relationship between coefÏicient of variation and indicating that further work is required to investigate the con-
trafïic flow. ditions under which the different models could apply.
Taylor et al. 135
PROJECT 4207
PATH D
Speeds in Cor Porks
1986
65m
VENTURE COLES
E
I
'1"
t-51qJÈÍ I
lã3
--| IGÈ
+lt-lt I
ñ
L
Ei*t--.
r
LJ
lrt;¡\.+
M
J e
t::" RìÙ-.'
hl ÉT LI H
t E
I
E
t t L
t þ
t I H
L
t Ë
t t
b
t F f t
t tr t
t t
t t
FIGURE é Speed profïles for vehicles traveling along circulator (path A).
flexibility to adjust the location of detectors and to relate speed, it was assumed that any headway between two cars of
vehicle speeds to trip characteristics (e.g., whether or not the less than 5 sec represented car following. In such cases, the
vehicle was parking). The trailer housing the video camera second car was rejected.
was positioned and stabilized perpendicular to the vehicles'
movement path. The camera was then focused and raised to
the top of the mast (10 m). After the camera had begun RESULTS
recording, the aisles and circulatory roads were marked by
witches' hats at 5-m intervals so they could be located when The vehicles moving along the circulators were divided into
the video tape was processed. four groups (Figure 5): those vehicles that did not enter an
The extraction of the data from the video could be carried aisle (Path A), those that enrered Aisle 3 (path B), and those
out by a human observer, but this is time consuming. A pref- that exited Aisles 1 (Path C) and 2 (path D).
erable method is to extract the data automatically. VADAS The speed profiles of the vehicles that did not enter an aisle
was used to extract the vehicle headways. In this system, the (Path A) are shown in Figure 6. The average (space) speeds
speeds are calculated by measuring the times the recording of these vehicles fluctuated between Z1,.2kmlhr and25.2km/
points are activated and dividing the difference into the dis- hr. The general evenness of the speed profiles indicates that
tance between detection points. To determine the desired the drivers do in fact have a desired circulation or cruising
Taylor et al, 137
speed, which fluctuates at about 23.2kmlhr. The vehicles in For the aisles, these speeds were around 14 to 15 km/hr; for
this lane are moving toward another part of the parking lot the circulator, tliey were around 2l to 25 km/hr.
or are using the parking lot as an alternate route to bypass A difference means test was used to test the difference in
the adjacent arterial road system. The speed profiles for those speed of vehicles turning from a circulator into an aisle. These
vehicles exiting an aisle (Paths C and D) showed that there two means showed no significant difference, even though they
is a pattern of steady acceleration toward the desired speed were not on the same road. The mean desired circulation
similar to those of vehicles moving through the system (1ó). speed of a car turning the corner from a circulator into an
Vehicle speeds in aisles varied considerably. There are two aisle was 13 km/hr.
types of vehicles that use aisles: those that find a parking
space and those that are looking for a space. Vehicles of the
first type slow down as they approach the parking space (Fig-
ure 7). Vehicles of the second type travel along the aisle COMPARISON OF RADAR AND VIDEO DATA
looking for a parking space or leave the parking lot (Figure
8). A comparison ofthe speed profiles for both parking aisles Video has a considerable advantage over radar in that it is
showed that there is a slight difference in both the shape of
located perpendicular to the vehicle's motion. Thus, it can
the speed distribution and the mean velocity for each aisle. record speed readings along a length of road easily, and var-
This could be due to a number of aisle characteristics, includ- iations in the speed of the vehicle along the road can be
ing differences in the grades between these aisles and differ- measureci. The raciar unit is iocateci aheaci of the car, which
ences in the proportions of the stalls that were used in each
creates problems in locating the position of the vehicle. Fur-
aisle.
ther, radar and video measure different speeds. Video mea-
An important point to establish in the interpretation of sures a speed over a given length of road (space), whereas
speed profiles is whether or not the driver reaches the desired
radar measures it at a particular point (spot). Comparison of
circulation speed. By looking at the evenness of the profiles, the two methods therefore involves the assumption that the
it is reasonable to conclude that desired speeds are reached. speed measured by video is constant over the length chosen.
Comparison between the two approaches was required, there-
fore, to determine if they produced similar results.
Data Analysis time to collect and code speed data. The VADAS system
would be considerably faster once the users were familiar with
Data analysis was carried out by comparing the speeds of the the equipment.
vehicles provided by the radar and the video at the same point.
These methods ideally should produce similar results, since
they are both measuring the same vehicle speeds. Two tests AN APPRAISAL OF THE DATA COLLECTION
were conducted to compare the two data sets. One test com- AND ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE
pared the overall means of each sample, while the other com-
pared the individual data between the two samples. A number of points should be considered when collecting
The comparison of the means is shown in Table 3. The data using the video:
significance of the difference of the means is shown using the
probability value. It is the significance level associated with o The position of the sun and its intensity play a significant
a significant ditference in the means. The first probability role in the quality of the recorded image. Glare tends to
value indicates the difference in the location of both speed confuse distant images, and the contrast between the image
distributions by comparing the sample means. It can be seen being observed and the background must be great enough to
that there is little difference at the L percent level. The second register a difference when the data is analyzed.
probability value refers to the paired means test. It indicates . It may be difficult to determine movements associated
whether the difference in the mean differences of individual with vehicles obscured behind larger vehicles. The positioning
speeds is not equal to zero. At the 1 percent level this is in of the camera should consider this possibility.
fact the case for all but Path B. There is therefore little evi- o The area the video can cover is restricted by the lens used
dence to support the hypothesis that the individual speeds in the camera; however, distortion error may result from the
measured by the two methods are the same. However, the curvature of the camera lenses. Consideration should be given
overall mean from the two data sets shows no difference. This to the need to have a site that will allow the video to cover
is consistent with arterial road speed studies (3). the full study area.
Another comparison of individual speeds was made using o Parallax errors will also result from the use of the camera
regression. If, as assumed, the video and the radar give similar since the camera image is two-dimensional while the actual
results, the linear regression should give a 45'line with an situation is three-dimensional. This two-dimensionality could
intercept at the origin. The results of four comparisons are cause errors in the distance traveled between the two markers
given in Table 4. on the screen. Corrections must be made.
The correlation between the two data sets is high, indicating o Although the extendible mast allows the camera to look
a strong relationship between the radar and the video read- down on the traffic flow for near sites, vehicles at distant sites
ings. However, as with the pairs Êtest, the individual readings must be viewed somewhere between a top view and a profile.
are not directly comparable. The video tended to underestimate This may cause a problem since the profile of a vehicle is not
the low radar speeds and overestimate the high radar speeds. square and, since vehicles do not always follow the same path,
The lack of agreement between the individual readings dis- the detector points may be activated by the hood or bonnet,
cussed earlier was therefore confirmed. or missed altogether. In such a case, some of the detector
Comparison of the radar and the video speed readings indi- points may have to be adjusted to detect the same point on
cated that the overall mean speed did not vary but the indi- the vehicles consistently.
vidual speed readings were not consistent. However, a sig- o Dark cars and motorbikes were very difficult for the data
nificant difference in statistical testing may have little practical logger to detect because a change in brightness is required to
impact. The magnitude of the differences in the mean speed activate the detector. Another effect of dark vehicles is that
using the two measuring techniques is 1.17 km/hr with a stan- the blimp may not be activated when the first part of the car
dard deviation of 3.30. The accuracy of both the radar and passes the blimp.
the video is approximately 1 km/hr. In the light of the mea- o Quite often, a car passed through a detector and caused
surement error in the two techniques, a L . 17 km/hr difference the detector points to flash until the car was totally past. This
is, for practical purposes, small. Due to the small sample sizes caused a succession of times to be recorded. In this case, the
of these surveys, further studies would be needed to confirm first time would be considered the correct time.
these initial conclusions. o The sensitivity of the data logger was continually adjusted
A comparison of the time taken to collect and extract speeds by the brightness of the sun. This was a problem in cloudy
using video and radar was also undertaken. The radar survey conditions, for the brightness changed every time the clouds
required two people for the duration of the survey (4 hr) to cleared. For the purposes of data logging, it would thus be
collect the data. The video, once set up, can be left unmanned, preferable to collect data on a bright, sunny day. This woutd
and therefore requires only one person for an initial period also cause more of the darker cars to be detectable due to
(approximately t hr) to ensure that the trailer and unit are the sun's reflection off their body panels.
positioned and recording correctly. The data-extraction times
for VADAS were similar to that of the headway data (around
6 hr) but would be considerably lower if the equipment was CONCLUSIONS
used regularly. The radar data was quickly transcribed into
the computer (around t hr) due to the small amount of data. Video-based data collection systems allow data to be collected
It therefore appears that both methods require about the same that have previously been unavailable using traditional tech-
Taylor et al. 139
Standard Standard
Path Type Mean Deviation Mean Deviation Mean Paired Means
niques (e.g., headways on multilane freeways and desired 7. A. J. Miller. An Empirical Model for Multilane Road Traffic
Flow. Transportation Science,Yol. 4,1970, pp. 164-186.
circulating speeds in car parks). This technology provides the
8. D. Mahalel and A. S. Hakkert. Traffic Arrival Patterns on a
traffic researcher with an unobtrusive method of observing Cross Section of a Multilane Highway. Transportation Research,
traffic movements. Video tapes of traffic events contain much Vol. A 174, No. 4, 1983, pp.263-270.
more information than manual recorders can collect' The 9. C-C. Chen. Lane by Lane Speed-Volume Studies on a Six-Lane
additional information becomes invaluable when modeling Freeway. Proc., 13th ARRB Conf., Vol. 13, No. 7, 1986, pp.
1-13.
complex traffic movements. The flexibility of being able to 10. D. L. Gerlough and F. C. Barnes. Poisson and Other Dßtribu-
position the on-screen detector points allows a wide range of tions in Trffic. Eno Foundation for Transportation, Sâugatuck,
traffic parameters to be collected. Conn.,1971.
The VADAS system offers a reasonably fast method of 11. W. Young, M. A. P. Taylor, and P. Gipps. Mícrocomputers ín
Traffic Engineerirzg. Research Studies Press, Letchworth, 1988.
collecting and extracting traffic survey data. Editing programs
72. K. H. Lenz and R. Hotop. Some Results Derived From Auto-
are necessary to ensure that the data extracted are accurate. matic Traffic Monitoring. Strassenv erkehrs technik I, 797 0.
Considerable time savings occur when operators become 13. J. Rorbech. The Multilane Traffic FIow Process. Ph.D. disser-
experienced with this technology. The technology also offers tation. Ministry of Public Works, Copenhagen,7974.
reasonable accuracy compared with traditional techniques, 14. R. G. Thompson, M. A. P. Taylor, and W. Young. TRANSTAT:
provided weather is appropriate and an adequate vantage A Microcomputer Program for Fitting Probability Distributions
to Traffic Data. Proc., 14th ARRB Conf . , 1988 (in press).
point can be found. 15. M. A. P. Taylor and W. Yotng. Traffic Analysß: New Tech-
nology and New Solutions. Hargreen Publishing Co., Melbourne,
1988.
REFERENCES 16. W. Young. An Exploratory Study of Speeds in Parking Lots.
Report AIR 466-1. Australian Road Research Board, 1987.
17. M. A. P. Taylor and W. Young. The Distribution of Speeds and
1. M. R. Wigan. Some Investigations of Image Processing Tech- Gaps in Traffic Studies.In Traffic Flow Theory (P. G. Gipps,
niques Applied to Road Problems. Proc., lst International ed.), Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, 1984.
Cõnference on the Applications of Advanced Technology in 18. M. Armour. Vehicle Speeds in Residential Streets. Proc., llth
Transportation Engineering, ASCE, San Diego, Calif., i989, pp. ARRB Conf., Vol. 11, No.5, 1982, pp.90-205.
424-431. 19. J. R. Mclean. Two-Lane Road Traffic FIow and Capacit¡,. R¿psrt
2. R. Troutbeck and M. R. Wigan. Workshop on Visual Data Acquï AIR 359-6. Australian Road Resea¡ch Board, 1982, chap. 10.
sition and Applicanoz. Report ARR 1.51. Australian Road Research 20. Car Parking Facility: Off-Street Parking. Standards Association
Board, Vermont South, Victoria, 1988. of Australia, AS 2890.1, 1986.
3. R. Troutbeck and J. Dods. Video-Based Traffic Data Collec- 21,. M. A. P. Taylor and L. M. Rutherford. Speed Profiles at Slow
tion. In Trffic Analysis: New Technology and New Solution Points on Residential Streets. Proc., 13th ARRB Conf.,Yol. 13,
(M. A. P. Taylor and W. Young, eds.), Hargreen Publishing No. 9, 1986, pp.65-77.
Co., Melbourne, 1988.
4. D. J. Buckley. Road Traffic Headway Distributions. Proc., lst
ARRB Conf.,Yol. l,1962, pp. 153-183.
5. A. Schuhl. Poisson and Traffic. Eno Foundation for Transpor-
tation, Saugatuck, Conn., 1955, pp. 59-74.
6. R. J. Cowan. Useful Headway Models. Transportation Research, Publication of this paper sponsored by Committee on Applications of
Emerging Technology.
Vol. 9, No. 6,1975, pp.371.-375.