MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee:EMILY DIAZ DE VERA Name of Rater: JOCELYN A. DELA CRUZ

Position: TEACHER I Position: PRINCIPAL I,OIC,OFFICE OF PRINCIPAL II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED SDO 1 PANGASINAN Date of Review: FEBRUARY 30,2024
Rating Period: AUGUST 2023– MAY 2024

Tim Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year

MFOs KRAs Objectives elin per Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
e KRA ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 28% Classroom Observation Tool

Education Knowledge knowledge of (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services and content within observer agreement form/s
Pedagogy and across done through onsite/ face-to- Quality
curriculum face/ in-person classroom
teaching areas. observation.
(PPST 1.1.2)
If onsite / face-to-face/ in-
person classes are not
implemented,
•through observation of
synchronous/ asynchronous
teaching in other modalities; Efficiency
or
•through observation of a
demonstration teaching *via
LAC session. Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a range Classroom Observation Tool
Education of teaching (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services strategies that observer agreement form/s
enhance learner done through onsite/ face-to-
Quality
achievement in face/ in-person classroom
literacy and observation.
numeracy skills. If onsite / face-to-face/ in-
(PPST 1.4.2) person classes are not
implemented,
• through observation of
synchronous/
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or Efficiency
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching
*via LAC session.
 Tim Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives elin per Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
e KRA ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a Classroom Observation Tool
Education range of teaching (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services strategies to observer agreement form/s
develop critical done through onsite/ face-to-
and creative face/ in-person classroom Quality
thinking, as well observation.
as other higher-
order thinking If onsite / face-to-face/ in-
skills. person classes are not
(PPST 1.5.2) implemented,
• through observation of
synchronous/
asynchronous teaching in Efficiency
other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching
*via LAC session.
Timeliness
Basic 4. Displayed Classroom Observation Tool
Education proficient use of (COT) rating sheet/s or
Services Mother Tongue,
inter-observer agreement
Filipino and
English to form/s done through
onsite / face-to-face / in- Quality
facilitate teaching
and learning. person classroom
(PPST 1.6.2) observation. If onsite /
face-to-face / in-person
classes are not
implemented, • through
observation of
synchronous / Efficiency
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or •
through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
Timeliness
via LAC session.
Basic 2. Learning 5. Established 28% Classroom Observation Tool
Education Environment safe and secure (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services and Diversity learning observer agreement form/s Quality
of Learners environments to done through onsite/ face-to-
 Tim Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives elin per Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
e KRA ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
enhance learning face/ in-person classroom
through the observation.
consistent
implementation of If onsite / face-to-face/ in- Efficiency
policies, person classes are not
guidelines, and implemented,
procedures. • through observation of
(PPST 2.1.2) synchronous/
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
• through observation of a Timeliness
demonstration teaching
*via LAC session.
Basic 6. Maintained Classroom Observation Tool
Education learning (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services environments observer agreement form/s
that promote done through onsite/ face-to- Quality
fairness, respect, face/ in-person classroom
and care to observation.
encourage
learning. (PPST If onsite / face-to-face/ in-
2.2.2) person classes are not
implemented,
•through observation of
synchronous/
asynchronous teaching in Efficiency
other modalities; or
•through observation of a
demonstration teaching
*via LAC session.
Timeliness
Basic 7. Established a Classroom Observation Tool
Education learner-centered (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services observer agreement form/s
culture by using
done through onsite/ face-to-
teaching face/ in-person classroom
strategies that observation. Quality
respond to their
linguistic, If onsite / face-to-face/ in-
cultural, person classes are not
implemented,
socioeconomic
 Tim Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives elin per Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
e KRA ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
and religious • through observation of
backgrounds. synchronous/
asynchronous teaching
(PPST 3.2.2)
in other modalities; or
• through observation of
a demonstration Efficiency
teaching *via LAC
session.

Timeliness
8. Adapted and Classroom Observation Tool
used culturally (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
appropriate observer agreement form/s
teaching done through onsite/ face-to- Quality
strategies to face/ in-person classroom
address the observation.
needs of learners
from indigenous If onsite / face-to-face/ in-
groups. (PPST person classes are not
3.5.2) implemented,
• through observation of
synchronous/ Efficiency
asynchronous teaching
in other modalities; or
• through observation
of a demonstration teaching
*via LAC session. Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 9. Set achievable 21% At least one (1) lesson plan
Education and Planning and appropriate (e.g., DLP, DLL, WHLP,
Services & WLP, WLL, Lesson
learning
Assessment Exemplars, and the likes)
and outcomes that or one lesson from a self-
Reporting are aligned with learning module,
learning developed by the ratee* Quality
competencies. and used in instruction,
(PPST 4.2.2) with achievable and
appropriate learning
outcomes that are aligned
with the learning
competencies as shown in
 Tim Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives elin per Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
e KRA ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
any one (1) of the
following: •
lecture/discussion •
activity/activity sheet •
performance task • rubric
for assessing performance Efficiency
using criteria that
appropriately describe the
target output

Timeliness
Basic 10. Used Classroom Observation Tool
Education strategies for (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services observer agreement form/s
providing timely,
done through onsite/ face-to-
accurate and face/ in-person classroom
constructive Quality
observation.
feedback to
improve learner If onsite / face-to-face/ in-
performance. person classes are not
implemented,
(PPST 5.3.2)
•through observation of
synchronous/
asynchronous teaching in Efficiency
other modalities; or
•through observation of a
demonstration teaching Timeliness
*via LAC session.
Basic 11. Utilized A list of identified least / Quality
Education assessment data most mastered skills based
Services to inform the
on the frequency of
modification of
teaching and errors / correct responses
learning practices with any one (1) of the
and programs. following supporting
(PPST 5.5.2) MOVs 1. accomplishment
report for remedial /
enhancement activities
(e.g., remedial sessions,
Summer Reading Camp,
Phil-IRI based reading Efficiency
 Tim Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives elin per Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
e KRA ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
program) 2. intervention
material used for
remediation /
reinforcement /
enhancement 3. lesson
plan/activity log for Timeliness
remediation /
enhancement utilizing of
assessment data to modify
teaching and learning
practices or programs
Basic 4. Personal 12. Build 21% Any one (1) of the following:
Education Growth and relationships 1. Proof of participation in
Services Professional any activity highlighting the
with parents/
Development objective, such as, but not
guardians and
limited the following: •
the wider school
Receipt form/monitoring
community to
form during distribution of Quality
facilitate learning materials, etc. •
involvement in Commitment form to
the educative stakeholders, developed
process. (PPST advocacy materials,
6.2.2) certificate of participation
that shows
parents’/stakeholders’
engagement signed by the Efficiency
school head, etc. • Home Timeliness
visitation forms • Any
equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective •
Others (please specify and
provide annotations) 2.
Parent-teacher log or proof
of other stakeholders
meeting (e.g., one-on-one
parent-teacher learner
conference log; attendance
sheet with minutes of
online or face-to-face
 Tim Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives elin per Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
e KRA ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
meeting; proof of
involvement in the
learners’/parents’
orientation, etc.) 3. Any
form of communication to
parents/stakeholders (e.g.,
notice of meeting;
screenshot of chat/text
message/communication
with parent/guardian

Basic 13. Participated 1. Certificate of completion

Education in professional in a course/training 2.
Services networks to share Certificate of participation in
knowledge and to a webinar, retooling,
enhance practice. upskilling, and other training/
Quality
(PPST 7.3.2) seminar/ workshop with
proof of implementation 3.
Certificate of recognition/
speakership in a webinar
and other training/ seminar/
workshop 4. Any proof of Efficiency
participation to a Timeliness
benchmarking activity 5. Any
proof of participation in
school LAC sessions
(online/face-to-face) certified
by the LAC Coordinator 6.
Others (please specify and
provide annotations)

Basic 14. Developed a 1. Certification from the ICT

Education personal Coordinator/ School Quality
Services improvement Head/ Focal Person in
plan based on charge of e-SAT.
reflection of one’s 2. IPCRF-DP Efficiency
practice and 3. Mid-year Review Form
ongoing (MRF)
professional 4. Updated IPCRF-DP from Timeliness
learning. (PPST Phase II
7.4.2)
 Tim Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives elin per Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
e KRA ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic Plus Factor 15. Performed 2% Any one (1) proof of:
Education various related • committee of involvement;
Services works/activities • involvement as
that contribute to module/learning material
the teaching- writer/validator; Quality
learning process. • involvement as a resource
person/speaker/ learning
facilitator in the
RO/SDO/school-initiated
TV/radio-based
instruction;
• book or journal
authorship/ co-
authorship/contributorship Efficiency
/ chairpersonship;
• participation in
demonstration teaching;
• participation as research
presenter in a
forum/conference;
• mentoring of pre-service/
in-service teachers;
• conducted research within
the rating period; Timeliness
• others (please specify)
with annotation on how it
contributed to the
teaching-learning
process.

JOCELYN A. DELA CRUZ EMILY DIAZ DE VERA MYRNA D. ORATE

Rater Ratee Approving Authority