MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Noreleen D. Landicho Name of Rater: Patrick M. Conti

Position: Teacher I Position: Master Teacher I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: STA. RITA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2023-2024

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year

Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
BASIC KRA 1: 1. Applied Knowledge Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- Quality
EDUCATION Content of Content within and observer agreement form/s done through onsite / face-to-
SERVICES Knowledge and across curriculum face/in-person classroom observation.
Pedagogy teaching areas (PPST
1.1.2) If onsite / face-to-face/in-person classes are not implemented,
7%
• through observation of synchronous / asynchronous teaching
Efficiency
in other modalities; or
• through observation of a demonstration teaching via LAC
session.

2. Used a range of Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- Quality
teaching strategies observer agreement form/s done through onsite / face-to-
that enhance learner face/in-person classroom observation.
achievement in literacy
and numeracy skills. 7% If onsite / face-to-face/in-person classes are not implemented,
(PPST 1.4.2) • through observation of synchronous / asynchronous teaching
in other modalities; or Efficiency
• through observation of a demonstration teaching via LAC
session.

3. Applied a range of Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- Quality
teaching strategies to observer agreement form/s done through onsite / face-to-
develop critical and face/in-person classroom observation.
creative thinking, as
well as other higher 7% If onsite / face-to-face/in-person classes are not implemented,
order thinking skills. • through observation of synchronous / asynchronous teaching
(PPST 1.5.2) in other modalities; or Efficiency
• through observation of a demonstration teaching via LAC
session.
4. Displayed Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- Quality
proficient use of observer agreement form/s done through onsite / face-to-
Mother Tongue, face/in-person classroom observation.
Filipino and English to
facilitate teaching and 7% If onsite / face-to-face/in-person classes are not implemented,
learning. • through observation of synchronous / asynchronous teaching
(PPST 1.6.2) in other modalities; or
Efficiency
• through observation of a demonstration teaching via LAC
session.
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
KRA 2: 5. Established Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- Quality
Learning safe and secure observer agreement form/s done through onsite / face-to-
Environment & learning environments face/in-person classroom observation.
Diversity of to enhance learning
Learners through the consistent 7% If onsite / face-to-face/in-person classes are not implemented,
Efficiency
implementation of • through observation of synchronous / asynchronous teaching
policies, guidelines in other modalities; or
and procedures. • through observation of a demonstration teaching via LAC
(PPST 2.1.2) session.
6. Maintained learning Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- Quality
environments that observer agreement form/s done through onsite / face-to-
promote fairness, face/in-person classroom observation.
respect and care to
encourage learning. 7% If onsite / face-to-face/in-person classes are not implemented, Efficiency
(PPST 2.2.2) • through observation of synchronous / asynchronous teaching
in other modalities; or
• through observation of a demonstration teaching via LAC
session.
7. Established a Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- Quality
learner-centered observer agreement form/s done through onsite / face-to-
culture by using face/in-person classroom observation.
teaching strategies
that respond to their 7% If onsite / face-to-face/in-person classes are not implemented, Efficiency
linguistic, cultural, • through observation of synchronous / asynchronous teaching
socio-economic and in other modalities; or
religious backgrounds. • through observation of a demonstration teaching via LAC
(PPST 3.2.2) session.
8. Adapted and used Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- Quality
culturally appropriate observer agreement form/s done through onsite / face-to-
teaching strategies to face/in-person classroom observation.
address the needs of
learners from 7% If onsite / face-to-face/in-person classes are not implemented,
Efficiency
indigenous groups. • through observation of synchronous / asynchronous teaching
(PPST 3.5.2) in other modalities; or
• through observation of a demonstration teaching via LAC
session.
KRA 3: 9. Set achievable 7% At least one (1) lesson plan Quality
Curriculum and and appropriate (e.g., DLP, DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL, Lesson Exemplars, and
Planning learning outcomes that the likes) or one lesson from a self-learning module, developed
are aligned with by the ratee* and used in instruction, with achievable and
learning appropriate learning outcomes that are aligned with the
competencies. learning competencies as shown in any one (1) of the
(PPST 4.2.2) following: Efficiency
• lecture/discussion
• activity/activity sheet
• performance task
• rubric for assessing performance using criteria that
appropriately describe the target output
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
10. Used strategies for Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or inter- Quality
providing timely, observer agreement form/s done through onsite / face-to-
accurate and face/in-person classroom observation.
constructive feedback
to improve learner 7% If onsite / face-to-face/in-person classes are not implemented,
Efficiency
performance. • through observation of synchronous / asynchronous teaching
(PPST 5.3.2) in other modalities; or
• through observation of a demonstration teaching via LAC
session.
11. Utilized A list of identified least / most mastered skills based on the Quality
assessment data to frequency of errors / correct responses with any one (1) of
inform the the following supporting MOVs
modification of 1. accomplishment report for remedial / enhancement activities
teaching and learning (e.g., remedial sessions, Summer Reading Camp, Phil-IRI-
practices and 7% based reading program)
programs. 2. intervention material used for remediation / reinforcement / Timeliness
(PPST 5.5.2) enhancement
3. lesson plan/activity log for remediation / enhancement
utilizing of assessment data to modify teaching and learning
practices or programs
12. Build relationships Any one (1) of the following: Quality
KRA 4: with parents/guardians 1. Proof of participation in any activity highlighting the
Assessment and the wider school objective, such as, but not limited the following:
and Reporting community to facilitate • Receipt form/monitoring form during distribution of learning
involvement in the materials, etc.
educative process. • Commitment form to stakeholders, developed advocacy
Timeliness
(PPST 6.2.2) materials, certificate of participation that shows parents’/
stakeholders’ engagement signed by the school head, etc.
• Home visitation forms
• Any equivalent ALS form/document that highlights the
7%
objective
• Others (please specify and provide annotations)
2. Parent-teacher log or proof of other stakeholders meeting
(e.g., one-on-one parent-teacher learner conference log;
attendance sheet with minutes of online or face-to-face
meeting; proof of involvement in the learners’/parents’
orientation, etc.)
3. Any form of communication to parents/stakeholders (e.g.,
notice of meeting; screenshot of chat/text message/
communication with parent/ guardian)
13. Participated in 7% 1. Certificate of completion in a course/training Quality
professional networks 2. Certificate of participation in a webinar, retooling, upskilling,
to share knowledge and other training/ seminar/ workshop with proof of
and to enhance implementation
practice. 3. Certificate of recognition/ speakership in a webinar and
(PPST 7.3.2) other training/ seminar/ workshop Timeliness
4. Any proof of participation to a benchmarking activity
5. Any proof of participation in school LAC sessions
(online/face-to-face) certified by the LAC Coordinator
6. Others (please specify and provide annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
14. Developed a 1. Certification from the ICT Coordinator / School Head / Focal Quality
personal improvement Person in charge of e-SAT
plan based on 2. IPCRF-DP Efficiency
reflection of one’s 7% 3. Mid-year Review Form (MRF)
practice and ongoing 4. Updated IPCRF-DP from Phase II
Timeliness
professional learning.
(PPST 7.4.2)
KRA 5: 15. Performed Any one (1) proof of: Quality
Personal various related ● committee involvement;
Growth and works /activities that ● involvement as module/ learning material writer/validator;
Professional contribute to the ● involvement as a resource person/speaker/learning facilitator
Development teaching-learning in in the RO/ SDO/ school-initiated TV/ radio-based instruction; Efficiency
process. ● book or journal authorship/ co-authorship/ contributorship;
● advisorship/ coordinatorship/ chairpersonship;
2%
● participation in demonstration teaching;
● participation as research presenter in a forum/conference;
● mentoring of pre-service/ in-service teachers; Timeliness
● conducted research within the rating period;
● others (please specify)
with annotation on how it
contributed to the teachinglearning process.

NORELEEN D. LANDICHO PATRICK M. CONTI LARSIE M. MACARAIG

Teacher I Master Teacher I Principal II
Ratee Rater Approving Authority