Cognitive Psychology Final Exam Reviewer
Cognitive Psychology Final Exam Reviewer
Cognitive Psychology Final Exam Reviewer
😡
Ganda mo so much!) *kamo na man daw mag highlight Kapagod so much!
Prototype Approach
● High prototypicality - A category
member closely resembles the
category prototype
● Low prototypicality - Category
member does not closely resemble a
typical member of the category
LEVELS OF CATEGORIES
Characteristics of PDP
1. Cognitive processes are based on
parallel operations, rather than serial
operations.
● Many patterns of activation ● PDP can help people make
may be proceeding spontaneous generalizations.
simultaneously. ● Spontaneous generalization: using
2. Network contains basic neuron-like individual cases to draw inferences
units or nodes, which are connected about
together so that a specific node has ➔ “Engineers as not good with
many links to other nodes language”
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY FINAL EXAM REVIEWER (Tugon: Thank you, bosxzsxs Monica!
😡
Ganda mo so much!) *kamo na man daw mag highlight Kapagod so much!
Pragmatic Approach
● Proposes that people pay attention
to the aspect of a message that is
most relevant to their current goals
1. People know that they usually need
to accurately recall the gist of a
sentence
2. They also know that they usually do
not need to remember the specific
wording of the sentences.
Memory Integration and Gender
3. However, in those cases where they
Stereotypes
do need to pay attention to the
● Stereotypes can have the power to
specific wording, then they know that
influence people’s self-images and
their verbatim memory needs to
their sense of academic
be highly accurate.
competence.
● People are particularly likely to pay
attention to the exact wording of a
sentence if the words are part of a
criticism or an insult.
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY FINAL EXAM REVIEWER (Tugon: Thank you, bosxzsxs Monica!
Ganda mo so much!) *kamo na man daw mag highlight😡Kapagod so much!
➡️
in nearby words are exchanged
(Snow flurries Flow snurries) Producing a sentence
2. Morpheme errors - occurs when
morphemes are exchanged in
nearby words
➡️
(self-destruct instruction
self-instruct destruction) ● Linearization problem - challenge
3. Word errors - occur when words of arranging words in an ordered,
➡️
are exchanged linear sequence
(letter to my mother writing a ● Prosody - the ‘‘melody’’ of its
mother to my letter) intonation, rhythm, and emphasis
Explanation for Slip-of-tongue errors
1. We utter the sounds that are most
highly activated, and usually these
sounds are the appropriate ones.
2. Each sound can be activated by
several different words. Producing language: Conversations
3. Incorrect items sometimes have
activation levels that are just as high Semantic Coordination
as (or higher than) the correct items. ● Conversation go more smoothly
when the people talking bring shared
Using gestures knowledge
● Gestures are visible movements of ● Speakers take steps to guide their
any part of your body, which you use listeners through the conversation
to communicate Given-new contract
➔ can help you remember the ● constructing sentences given two
word you want to produce kinds of information
➔ when our verbal system ➔ 1. Given information -
cannot retrieve a word, a information that the listener
gesture can sometimes already knows
activate the relevant 2. New information -
information information that the listener is
hearing for the first time
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY FINAL EXAM REVIEWER (Tugon: Thank you, bosxzsxs Monica!
😡
Ganda mo so much!) *kamo na man daw mag highlight Kapagod so much!
Bilingualism
Bilingual speaker
● is someone who is fluent in two or
more different languages
● A sentence not observing given-new ● Simultaneous bilingualism :
contract learning two languages
simultaneously during childhood
● Sequential bilingualism : acquiring
native language and then a second
language
Understanding
● you have constructed a
well-organized mental
representation of the problem, based
on both the information provided in
the problem and your own previous
experience
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY FINAL EXAM REVIEWER (Tugon: Thank you, bosxzsxs Monica!
😡
Ganda mo so much!) *kamo na man daw mag highlight Kapagod so much!
Conditional Syllogisms
Syllogism: Validity & Truth ● Has two premises and a conclusion
● A syllogism is valid if its conclusion ● The first premise has the form “if….
follows logically from its two then...”
premises. Example: Knowing that Steve
doesn’t pay the money he borrowed.
If I lend Steve Php 50.00, then I
won’t get it back. I lent Steve Php
50.00. Therefore, I won’t get my Php
50.00 back.
Validity and Truth in Syllogism 4 types of Conditional Syllogisms
● Validity depends on the form of
syllogism.
● Truth depends on the content of the
premises which have to be
evaluated to determine whether they
are consistent with the facts.
● Valid syllogisms can result in false
conclusions. p (antecedent) - first or if term
q (consequent) - second or then term
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY FINAL EXAM REVIEWER (Tugon: Thank you, bosxzsxs Monica!
😡
Ganda mo so much!) *kamo na man daw mag highlight Kapagod so much!
Risk aversion
➢ the tendency to avoid taking risks