Cortisol AccuBind ELISA Rev 4
Cortisol AccuBind ELISA Rev 4
Cortisol AccuBind ELISA Rev 4
Reagent (fill)
variability of the 0 µg/dl serum calibrator and using the 2σ (95% C) 1 (7ml) 2 (7ml)
A3 1.056 eliminate maximal interference; however, potential interaction
Patient 1.071 10.24 certainty) statistic to calculate the minimum dose. D) 1 plate 2 plates
B3 1.086 between rare serum specimens and test reagents can cause
erroneous results. Heterophilic antibodies often cause these E) 1 (20ml) 1 (20ml)
*The data presented in Example 1 and Figure 1 is for illustration interactions and have been known to be problems for all kinds 14.3 Accuracy F) 1 (7ml) 2 (7ml)
only and should not be used in lieu of a standard curve prepared of immunoassays. (Boscato LM Stuart MC.’Heterophilic The Cortisol AccuBind® ELISA Test System was compared with a
G) 1 (7ml) 2 (7ml)
with each assay. antibodies: a problem for all immunoassays’ Clin. Chem coated tube radioimmunoassay method. Biological specimens
from low, normal and high cortisol level populations were used. H) 1 (8ml) 2 (8ml)
1988:3427-33). For diagnostic purposes the results from this
assay should be used in combination with clinical examination, The values ranged from 0.4 µg/dl – 95µg/dl. The total number of
Figure 1
patient’s history and, all other clinical findings. such specimens was 202. The least square regression equation
4. For valid test results, adequate controls and other parameters and the correlation coefficient were computed for this cortisol EIA
3.000
must be within the listed ranges and assay requirements. in comparison with the reference method. The data obtained is
2.500 5. If test kits are altered, such as by mixing parts of different kits, displayed in Table 4.
which could produce false test results, or if results are
Absorbance(s)
2.000 TABLE 4
incorrectly interpreted, Monobind shall have no liability.
1.500 6. If computer controlled data reduction is used to interpret the Mean Least Square Correlation
Patient results of the test, it is imperative that the predicted values for Method (x) Regression Analysis Coefficient
1.000 Monobind (y) 16.6 y = -0.228+1.0186(x) 0.984
the calibrators fall within 10% of the assigned concentrations.
0.500 7. Total serum cortisol values may be dependent upon conditions Reference (X) 16.8
such as time of the day for sampling or administration of
0.000 prednisolone or prednisone (structurally related to cortisol). Only slight amounts of bias between this method and the
0 10 20 30 40 50 Caution must be exercised while interpreting cortisol levels for reference method are indicated by the closeness of the mean
patients undergoing therapy with these and other structurally values. The least square regression equation and correlation
Cortisol Values in µg/dl coefficient indicates excellent method agreement.
related corticosteroids such as cortisone or corticosterone.
11.0 Q.C. PARAMETERS 14.4 Specificity
13.0 EXPECTED RANGES OF VALUES The % cross-reactivity of the cortisol antibody to selected
In order for the assay results to be considered valid the substances was evaluated by adding the interfering substance to
A study of normal adult population was undertaken to determine a serum matrix at various concentrations. The cross-reactivity was
following criteria should be met:
expected values for the Cortisol AccuBind® ELISA Test System. calculated by deriving a ratio between doses of interfering
1. The absorbance (OD) of calibrator 0 µg/dl should be > 1.3.
The mean (R) values, standard deviations (σ) and expected substance to dose of cortisol needed to displace the same amount
2. Four out of six quality control pools should be within the
ranges (±2σ) are presented in Table 1. of labeled analog.
established ranges.
TABLE I Substance Cross Reactivity
12.0 RISK ANALYSIS Expected Values for the cortisol EIA Test System (in µg/dl) Cortisol 1.0000
Population Morning Afternoon Androstenedione 0.0004
The MSDS and Risk Analysis Form for this product are available Adult 5 - 23 µg/dl 3 -13 µg/dl Cortisone 0.2300
on request from Monobind Inc. Child 3 - 21 µg/dl 3 -10 µg/dl Corticosterone 0.1800
Newborn 1 - 24 µg/dl 11-Deoxycortisol 0.0550
12.1 Assay Performance Please note: Normal results may vary from lab to lab Dexamethasone 0.0001
1. It is important that the time of reaction in each well is held
Progesterone 0.0002
constant to achieve reproducible results. It is important to keep in mind that establishment of a range of 17α-OH Progesterone ND
2. Pipetting of samples should not extend beyond ten (10) values which can be expected to be found by a given method for a DHEA ND
minutes to avoid assay drift. population of "normal"-persons is dependent upon a multiplicity of Estradiol ND
3. Highly lipemic, hemolyzed or grossly contaminated factors: the specificity of the method, the population tested and Estrone ND
specimen(s) should not be used. the precision of the method in the hands of the analyst. For these Danazol ND
4. If more than one (1) plate is used, it is recommended to repeat reasons each laboratory should depend upon the range of Testosterone ND
the dose response curve. expected values established by the Manufacturer only until an
5. The addition of substrate solution initiates a kinetic reaction, in-house range can be determined by the analysts using the
which is terminated by the addition of the stop solution. method with a population indigenous to the area in which the 15.0 REFERENCES
Therefore, the substrate and stop solution should be added in laboratory is located.
the same sequence to eliminate any time-deviation during 1. Burtis CA, Ashweed ER: Tietz ‘Textbook of Clinical
reaction. Chemistry’ 2nd Ed. W.B. Saunders Company. Philadelphia,
14.0 PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS
6. Plate readers measure vertically. Do not touch the bottom of 1994. pp 1825-27.
the wells. 2. Foster L, Dunn R, ‘Single antibody technique for
14.1 Precision
7. Failure to remove adhering solution adequately in the radioimmunoassay of cortisol in unextracted serum or
The within and between assay precision of the Cortisol
aspiration or decantation wash step(s) may result in poor plasma’, Clin Chem, 20, 365 (1974).
AccuBind® ELISA Test System were determined by analyses on
replication and spurious results. 3. Wilson JD, Foster DW, (Editors) Williams Textbook of
three different levels of pool control sera. The number, mean th
8. Use components from the same lot. No intermixing of reagents Endocrinology, 7 Ed WB Saunders, Philadelphia (1985).
values, standard deviation and coefficient of variation for each of
from different batches. 4. Ruder H, et al, “Radioimmunoassay for cortisol in plasma
these control sera are presented in Table 2 and Table 3.
9. Accurate and precise pipetting, as well as following the exact and urine”, J Endo and Metab, 35, 219 (1972).
time and temperature requirements prescribed are essential. 5. Crapo L, “Cushing’s syndrome: A review of diagnostic tests”,
Metabolism, 28, 955-977 (1979).