SMA4803 Guide Combined Learning Units
SMA4803 Guide Combined Learning Units
SMA4803 Guide Combined Learning Units
This study guide serves as an extension to the prescribed book for SMA4803. The
purpose of the study guide is not only to supplement the prescribed book, but to introduce
practical aspects of ensuring safety compliance and excellence in the workplace. We
encourage you to complete all the activities in the study guide and on myUnisa. The
activities will provide you with insight and conceptual skills as well as a new way of
thinking and applying knowledge. It is very important to use the study guide as it will
guide you through the prescribed textbook.
The module will provide you with knowledge and skills related to the principles of the
management of prevention through design within the South African context. This implies
developing skills to identify and manage hazards and risks from a safety perspective.
Aspects of safety management systems, ergonomics, prevention and management of
prevention will be covered in this module. Learning unit 1 will focus on facilitating the
design, implementation and evaluation of a safety management system from a safety
perspective. This include an introduction to the fundamentals of the science of safety,
safety leadership, organisational elements and the working environment.
The following diagram illustrates the main topics and specific learning units of this module:
1
LEARNING UNIT 1
The science of safety management systems (SMSs)
Design, implementation and audit of safety management systems regarding
safety leadership and organisational elements
LEARNING UNIT 2
Safe design
Hazard identification, engineering controls and risk reduction
LEARNING UNIT 3
Prevention through ergonomics
Design, implementation and audit of an ergonomic safety programme
LEARNING UNIT 4
Managing prevention through the workplace environment conditions
Design, implementation and audit of a good housekeeping programme
LEARNING UNIT 5
Prevention through recording and reporting
Design, implementation and audit of recording and reporting systems
LEARNING UNIT 6
Job safety analysis (JSA) as part of the safety process
Design, implementation and audit of job safety analysis as part of the safety
process
2
The purpose of the study guide is not only to supplement the prescribed book, but to
introduce practical aspect of safety systems within the workplace. It is very important to
acquire the prescribed textbook for this module. The study guide is based on the following
prescribed textbook, and must be studied in conjunction with it:
McKinnon, RC. 2020. The design, implementation and audit of occupational health and
safety management. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
3
LEARNING UNIT 1: SCIENCE OF SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
Learning outcomes
On completion of this learning unit and chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 in the prescribed
textbook, you should be able to:
Key concepts
Safety management system
Safety hazards
Safety risks
Standards
Legislation
SHEQRS
4
Risk assessment
Plan, do, check, act (PDCA) cycle
1.1 Introduction
Li and Guldenmund (2018) define a safety management system (SMS) as a management
process which include management procedures, elements and activities with the aim of
improving safety performance within an organisation. The SMS will include policy,
objectives, plans, procedures, responsibilities and measurements to manage safety
hazards and risks which form part of any workplace (Thomas, 2012). Thomas (2012)
provides the basic components of a SMS as:
• the identification of safety hazards
• the remedial action to maintain safety performance
• the continuous monitoring and assessment of safety performance
• the continuous improvement of the overall performance of the SMS
Valdez Banda et al (2019) claim that a SMS is not only used to assess organisational
safety performance but also to assess the well-being of people, property and natural
5
environment. Valdez Banda et al (2019) further explain that a SMS must fulfil the
applicable regulatory standards as well as those standards and aims of the organisation.
Li and Guldenmund (2018) state that organisations differ and that the applicable
standards used in an organisation will affect how the SMS is implemented and how audits
and regulatory compliance are performed by each organisation.
Looking at the above, it is clear that a safety professional needs to know what a SMS
entails and that all SMSs are unique to each organisation and vital across all industries.
The focus of this learning unit and chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 in the prescribed textbook
is on safety management systems overview, including the different terminology used, the
philosophy of safety, the design, implementation and auditing of SMSs and the
management principles that apply to the implementation of SMSs.
Some SMSs have been developed by specific organisations, such as the NOSA Five-
Star 5 system<<Author: Please confirm this. MM>> and the South African Bureau of
Standards that adopted the ISO 45001:2018 as SANS 45001:2018. These are merely
6
two most known SMSs used in South Africa. International standards for health and safety
were developed by the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), British
Standard for Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems (OHSAS) and
American National Standards Institute (ANSI). As previously explained, every
organisation is unique and can use existing SMSs or develop their own, based on existing
SMSs.
7
Activity 1.1 Safety management system terminology
Complete the following crossword puzzle relating to the terminology used in the textbook,
(Chapter 1) and study guide. 7
4 S
5 A 10
F
1 E
T 8
Y 9
6
M A N A G E M E N T
S
Y
S
3 T
E
2 M
Across
Down
8
1.3 The philosophy of safety
Long (2015) explains that philosophy is the study of existence, beliefs and ideas and that
the general approach to the philosophy of safety begins with prevention of accidents and
loss. McKinnon (2020) goes so far in stating that safety is synonymous with injury,
accident, risk and loss.
Unfortunately, this proposition is due to the fact that in any workplace human activity can
lead to accidents and incidents. The notions of “absolute safety”, “safety first” and “zero
harm” are desirable and one should remember that safety is about reducing risks to a
tolerable level. This is certainly not an easy task as safety is also considered an
uncertainty, unreliability, brings change, randomness and the presence of hazards and
risks. McKinnon (2020) therefore suggests that safety and its management is not a
precise science. The nature, design, amount of control and management of safety needs
to be based on sound estimation.
9
Discussion 1.1: Safety management systems
Read the article of Group Five’s SHEQ policy, available at:
http://www.g5.co.za/sus_she.php and the SHEQ policy of Mashova Group, available at:
https://www.mashova.com/pdf/sheq_policy.pdf. Identify and compare the SMSs use by
these organisations. How do the SMSs of these organisations relate to the SMSs of your
organisation? Explain your answers to your fellow classmates in the discussion forum on
the myUnisa module site.
The first two components will be covered in this learning unit. You can refresh your
memory about the rest of the components at the following websites:
10
• Hazard control – the hierarchy of controls by Druley (2018). Available at:
https://www.safetyandhealthmagazine.com/articles/16790-the-hierarchy-of-
controls
• Work site inspections – effective workplace inspections. Available at:
https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/prevention/effectiv.html
• Worker competency and training – training and competency. Available at:
https://www.coresafety.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/CORESafety-Handbook-
Module5.pdf
• Incident/accident reporting and investigation – accident/incident investigation
guidance. Available at:
file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/Accident__incident_investigation_guidance_for_
managers%20(1).pdf
• Emergency planning – emergency planning. Available at:
https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/hsprograms/planning.html
• Health and safety programme – elements of an effective health and safety
program. Available at: https://www.kznhealth.gov.za/occhealth/effective.pdf
11
It is essential that health and safety roles and responsibilities for all levels of employment
is well defined and communicated under legislation and organisational standards. There
must also be clear management expectations and consequences (McKinnon, 2020 &
CCOHS, 2015).
With the implementation of a SMS, the first activity is to achieve desired results, which
include the design, maintenance, timelines and determining milestones (McKinnon,
2020). McKinnon (2020) provides the following key elements with the design and
implementation of a SMS:
Table 1.1: Key elements of the management functions during the design and
implementation of a SMS
Key elements Management function
• A planning tool – assisting management to:
cope with future uncertainty
use past data and analysis of trends
use past trends to predict future safety performance
form a picture of how the SMS will impact the opportunity
to reduce risk in the future
Safety forecasting • Is a predictive activity to estimate the probability,
frequency and severity of accidents that may happen in
future.
• Forecasting tools include:
risk assessment
critical task identification
task risk assessment
• Allocation of financial and other resources to achieve
safety objectives of organisation’s policy statement.
Safety budgeting • Include allocation of fund for:
repairs, machine guarding and other safety upgrades
training costs
• Objectives determine what safety results are desired by
Setting safety objectives organisation.
• Should be upstream objectives
12
• Implementation may take up to five years but depends on
what system and programmes the organisation has in
place.
Time related • Objectives are time related and include complete
implementation over time.
• Implementation must be a step-by-step process to avoid
resistance to change.
• Safety policies serve as a deliberate system of principles,
providing guidance and achieving planned outcomes.
Setting safety policies • Serves as implementation procedures, processes or
protocol.
and standards
• All SMSs must have a written policy, standard, procedure,
or programme and must establish the organisation’s
SMS.
• Time frames for the implementation of the SMS and will
Safety scheduling include activity scheduling, for example safety inspection
and training dates
• Based on risk assessment when risks are ranked and
Establishing safety
critical tasks identified.
procedures • Needs to be written procedures, monitored, reviewed and
updated on a periodic time frame.
McKinnon (2020) explains that different safety hazard identification methods can be used
to identify hazards in a workplace. Risk assessment of the identified hazards will assist in
determining the potential probability, frequency and severity of loss. Risk assessment is
therefore one of the key elements in a health and safety management system (McKinnon,
2020).
13
McKinnon (2020) propose the following steps in the risk assessment process and how
each step is linked to the risk management process (Figure 1.2):
Risk
• Implement the best techniques for risk reduction
evaluation
Figure 1.2: Link between risk assessment and risk management process
(Source: McKinnon, 2020 – adapted by author)
14
SMS standards will include the objectives, set standards of performance, responsibility
and prescribed actions needed. It is important that the legal requirements always serve
as the minimum standards and the ideal is to exceed the minimum legislative
requirements.
Example:
The National Building Regulations (NBR) of South Africa set out the minimum
requirements for stairs and stairways in SANS 10400. The minimum requirements
regarding safety are:
“Any stairway, including any wall, screen, railing or balustrade to such stairway, shall:
(a) be capable of safely sustaining any actions which can reasonably be expected to
occur and in such a manner that any local damage (including cracking) or
deformation do not compromise its functioning;
This means that all the elements relating to stairways and stairs must be properly
designed, referring to and read in conjunction with Part B of the NBR of South Africa
(Janek, 2011).
McKinnon (2020) explains that the implementation of a SMS can be over a long or a short
period. Usually organisations tend to implement a SMS that consist of high-risk elements
later, therefore over a longer period. This may be due to financial constraints; results are
not visible immediately or safety is taking a relative low priority in such organisations. In
general, most organisations start with a short-term objective and relatively inexpensive
implementation. For example, a housekeeping programme, which can be implemented in
a short period, is relatively inexpensive, show immediate results and would have a
15
positive effect on employees. Whether an organisation decides to implement a SMS over
a long or short period, its planning is needed.
Health and
safety
objectives
Establish
safety Safety
procedures forecasting
Safety
planning
Safety Safety
budgeting policy
Safety
scheduling
Basic management functions include planning, organising, leading and controlling and
are applied during the planning and implementation of a SMS (McKinnon, 2020).
Safety organising includes safety activities, processes and programmes that are
integrated in the normal daily management processes of an organisation and under no
circumstances must a SMS be regarded as a standalone system (McKinnon, 2020).
16
safety is carried out by employees, management support the health and safety initiatives
and objectives of the organisation.
Another important function of safety leading is safety communication. All safety issues
regarding the SMS process must be clearly communicated. It is important to remember
that communication must be two-way, meaning that there must be feedback and not only
information given. A communication system containing the SMS standards, policy and
other information will keep the employees informed and provide them the opportunity to
provide feedback on the SMS (McKinnon, 2020).
The next management function is safety controlling which includes seven steps:
17
• Results of measurement methods are quantified in the
form of percentage allocated, marks given or ranking
5. Evaluation of established.
conformance • Internal and external safety audits can be used
• Scores will indicate deviation from the prescribed
standards set, compliance to standards achieved
• Corrective action will be determined by amount of
deviation from set standards
• May involve enforcing safety standards and taking action
to regulate and improve used methods
6. Corrective action
• Standards must be established for corrective actions
• May include: better communication, training, feedback on
safety performances, modification of procedures,
standards, programmes and processes
• Employees must get recognition for adherence to
achievements
7. Commendation • Recognition for desired behaviours must be introduced –
e.g. a traveling trophy for good housekeeping and annual
safety award presentations and so on.
A method that can be used to implement and monitor the progress of a SMS is the plan,
do, check, act (PDCA) cycle. The PDCA is interactive process and consists of four stages.
It is focused on continuous improvement of processes, products, services and resolving
problems. The PDCA is used to systematically test a SMS for possible solutions, assess
results and implement SMSs that proof to be effective (McKinnon, 2020).
18
Do
Plan
Collect information
Identify and determine
risks Implement the SMS
plan,
Establish objectives,
processes and actions Start SMS processes,
training, set SMS
(SMS design phase)
standards
Act Check
Corrective action to Inspection and
rectify deviation from measurements acainst
planned achievements standards
Processes are Involves monitoring,
amended, modified and inspection, audit,
improved measurement and
Process of continuous review
improvement (SMS inspection, audit,
(SMS action phase) review phase)
19
7. What are the underlying problems? (competence, resources, accountability, etc.)
8. Provide your own solution to the barriers of an effective implementation of the
SMS.
• Formal and
thorough
• Regulatory
Description of
requirements
audit
are the
minimum
standard
Guidelines • OHSA 18001
used to reflect • ISO
the standards 45001:2018
20
• Experienced
SMS auditor
• Auditor
Who
accompanied
conducts this
by assistant
type of audit?
auditor with
equivalent
knowledge
Timeframe When required
(frequency) and according
for this type to needs of
of audit organisation
1.7 Conclusion
In this learning unit the focus is on a SMS, which is a system that is designed to develop,
plan, measure, analyse and control the safety performance of an organisation. The SMS
serves as a guide for the effective management of the health and safety of the
organisation. Any SMS requires the involvement of the organisation’s management and
employees and since occupational health and safety is a management function the role
of the organisation’s management is vital. It is the management that can bring about
changes as they have the authority to do so. The principles of management need to be
applied with the implementation and maintenance of a SMS and should form part of the
ongoing daily management of the organisation.
The organisation’s management must lead by example, set the standards, show
commitment in the health and safety of the organisation. It is not only legally required for
the employer to provide a healthy and safe work organisation; it is also required that the
health and safety of the organisation is communicated to all the employees and other
stakeholders. The organisation’s management must put extra effort into safety motivation
as employees need to get recognition for their contribution to the health and safety of the
organisation. It must be clearly understood that the health and safety of an organisation
is not only the responsibility of the top management, but the responsibility of every
employee and other stakeholders as well as for any SMS to be effective.
21
1.8 Self-assessment questions
22
1.9 Answers to activities
Activity 1.1
7
4
5 10
1
8
9
A
6 N S I L
P R O G R A M S O
F S S
S M S E L E M E N T S
T A
Y D N
3 A I D
M A N A G E M E N T A
2 O A C R
S S G I D
A Y E D S
S E
A C T N
E T
N E A R M I S S
Activity 1.2
The following serves as an example. You should apply your own answers according to
what SMS you are evaluating at your workplace.
23
order. The work zone is identified with the appropriate signage. Operators
are trained and have the minimum requirements to operate the machine.
3. Is there written documentation for the SMS?
Yes
4. List the available documentation.
• Safe operating procedure (SOP)
• Equipment maintenance records (EMR)
• Training, induction and experience register of operators
• Organisation health and safety policy
• Incident/accident records
• Safety inspection records
5. Complete the SMS progress report (Figure 4.1) in the prescribed textbook.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
24
• Management should be more focused on the work done by operators
on the wood drill press and not assume that the hazards and risks
are dealt with. – Should look at ergonomics – for example,
workstation design according to the physical appearance of
operators.
Activity 1.3
Type of
Internal Independent / Compliance
audit Baseline audit
audit external audit audit
25
for this to needs of • When
type of organisation required and
audit according to
needs of
organisation
Bahr, NJ. 2014. System safety engineering and risk assessment: a practical approach.
2nd edition. USA: Taylor and Francis.
26
References
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS). 2013. Effective
workplace inspections. Available from:
https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/prevention/effectiv.html [Accessed on 12 August
2021].
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS). 2015. Basic OH&S
program elements. Available from:
https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/hsprograms/basic.html [Accessed on 06 September
2020].
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS). 2017. Effective
workplace inspections. Available from:
https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/prevention/effectiv.html [Accessed on 12 August
2021].
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS). 2019. Emergency
planning. Available from: https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/hsprograms/planning.html
[Accessed on 12 August 2021].
27
Fernández-Muñiz, B, Montes-Peón, JM, Vázquez-Ordás, CJ. 2007. Safety management
system: development and validation of a multidimensional scale. Journal of Loss
Prevention in the Process Industries, 20(1):52–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2006.10.002.
KZN Health Department. n.d. Elements of an effective health and safety program.
Available from: https://www.kznhealth.gov.za/occhealth/effective.pdf [Accessed on 12
August 2021].
Li, Y & Guldenmund, F. 2018. Safety management systems: A broad overview of the
literature. Safety Science, 103:94-23. DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.11.016.
McKinnon, RC. 2020. The design, implementation and audit of occupational health and
safety management. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
Nortjè, N. 2019. History of occupational health and safety in South Africa. Available from:
https://www.saiosh.co.za/news/449742/History-of-Occupational-Health-and-Safety-in-
South-Africa.htm [Accessed on 04 September 2020].
Valdez Banda, OA, Goerlandt, F, Salokannel, J & van Gelder, PHAJM. 2019. An initial
evaluation framework for the design and operational use of maritime STAMP-based
safety management systems. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 18:451-476. DOI:
10.1007/s13437-019-00180-0.
28
Van Loggerenberg, F (ed). 2019. Occupational health and safety management. Cape
Town: Juta.
29
LEARNING UNIT 2: SAFE DESIGN
Learning outcomes
On completion of this learning unit and chapters 3, 4, 10 and 13 in the prescribed
textbook, you should be able to:
1. Explain the concept “safe design”.
2. Investigate the elements and principles of safe design.
3. Examine safety planning by design.
4. Relate working environment conditions to the design of work areas.
5. Apply the concepts of risk reduction through design.
6. Examine the hierarchy of hazard controls with the emphasis on engineering
control.
7. Give a synthesis of HIRA.
8. Interpret and analyse hazard reduction methods.
9. Analyse risk reduction strategies.
Key concepts
Design
Safe design
Hazard identification
Risk assessment
Occupational Health and Safety Act 85 of 1993
Hazard identification and risk assessment (HIRA)
Severity (Consequences)
Probability (Likelihood/frequency)
Risk matrix
2.1 Introduction
Unfortunately, the design phase of anything usually lacks the effect the design is going
to have on the occupants, operators and end-users. The ideal would be that safety
forms part of the design processes in the design of anything. Health and safety by
design is a process of managing health and safety risks during lifecycles of structures,
machines, substances, products and so on. Design codes and standards are written
to serve as guidelines for designers when it comes to safety in the workplace
(Worksafe NZ, 2018). The design for safety is not an easy task, for example: an
emergency light that is designed for a stairwell, assist occupants to use the stairwell
with safety in the event of an emergency. Overall, it is a different story for the
installation crew who must install the light and the maintenance staff who must test
and service the light periodically. If the installation and the maintenance of the light
was not considered in the design phase it may pose different hazards and risks.
Architects and engineers (who are considered the main designers) play a vital role
during the design phase to identify and mitigate potential hazards. The new approach
of prevention through design is recommended for continuous safety improvement
(Bhattacharjee, Ghosh & Young-Corbett, 2011).
As said, the ideal would be if safety can start with the design process, unfortunately
this does not always happen and the obligation rests on the organisation to take extra
steps in the prevention of accidents, incidents and occupational illnesses. In this
learning unit, you will learn more about the design of a safety management system,
the elements, components, processes and programmes. The focus will fall on the
principles of safety planning, hazard identification and risk assessment (HIRA)
(chapter 3 of the prescribed book), how the design of the HIRA process and its
implementation plays a role in safe design (chapter 13 of the prescribed book). The
function of safety control (chapter 4 of the prescribed book) and hazard control in a
safety management system (chapter 10 of the prescribed book).
2.2 Elements of safe design
Safe design can be defined as a process where hazard identification and risk
assessment methods are integrating as early as in the design process of a safety
management system. Safe design is therefore all about eliminating or minimising risks
of injury and damage throughout the lifecycle of a system (Safe Work Australia, n.d.).
The design of safety must be considered in the design of buildings, structures,
facilities, hardware, work systems, equipment, workplace layout and configuration,
and products (Worksafe Australia, 2021).
Worksafe NZ (2018) suggests the following benefits if safe design is included in the
planning phase of a system:
Safe design is a systematic process that collaboration between the designer(s) and all
other stakeholders, such as the client, employees, contractors and so on. The
designer(s) must provide information on how health and safety considerations were
incorporated into the design, whose risks were identified through the design process
and how the latter was eliminated or mitigated (Sitesafe, 2019). The safe design
process can be illustrated as follows:
Identify
hazards
SAFE
Review Assess the
controls DESIGN risks
Eliminate
or control
the risks
Figure 2.1: Safe design process
Source: Worksafe Australia, 2021 – adapted and changed
• The first step is identifying hazards which will be relating to all the stages of the
lifecycle of the system, for example hazardous manual handling or violence and
aggression.
• The second step is assessing the risk the identified hazards pose and the
likelihood of causing harm to people, workplace and environment.
• The third step is to implement effective control measures to eliminate the risk
or if elimination is not possible to reduce the risk of harm to an acceptable level,
for example noise reduction and machine guarding.
• The last step is to review the effectiveness of the controls, implemented in the
third step to ensure that the risks will be reduced to an acceptable level.
(Worksafe Australia, 2021)
Safe design begins at the conceptual and planning phase of a system, where the
emphasis is on planning in making the right choices and to eliminate hazards and
mitigate risks. Safety planning must form part of the safety design. A safety plan is a
comprehensive tool that entails a framework for safety practices in a specific activity
or department of an organisation. When a safety plan is designed, the specific action
(job) and department must be considered to provide the necessary information on how
to handle certain situations. Each safety plan will be designed to fit the unique situation
that arise (EHS Insight, 2018) and will include the following in the design process:
Blotzer (1999) explains that safety and health begin and belong in the design process
of any product or safety management system as design can reduce exposure to risks,
liability and enhances product or system efficiency. A successful and effective safety
management system of an organisation need leadership, employee engagement and
regular assessment and review, as well as the insurance that risks are dealt with
proportionately and responsibly. For that reason, it is essential that an organisation
consider the following principles when designing a safety plan:
These principles will assist in addressing the key areas of safety planning and may
serve as a foundation for safe design.
For the purpose of this learning unit, the safety plan for safe work areas will be
discussed.
2.3.1 Safe design for work areas
The effective and safe design and layout of work areas needs to be first priority for any
designer. The ideal is to reduce risks in the design and construction stage of a work
area. Designers directly influence the health and safety of an organisation’s workforce
and should aim at reducing risks from the start. Verge (2019) suggests that the design
and layout of the work area will determine the health and safety of the workplace and
will determine the flow of operations, and will be part of the safety planning process.
The layout of a work area will affect the efficiency and productivity of the organisation;
therefore, a poor design can be costly and result in wasted time, money and effort and
significantly increase the hazards of the work area. The cost for the poor design and
layout of a work area are significant and may ask for the following:
Watch the video: St John of God Hospital Berwick by WorkSafe Australia (2:05).
Available from: https://www.worksafe.vic.gov.au/case-study-st-john-god-hospital-
berwick, and read the article:
1. Discuss the benefits of the design process followed to build this hospital.
2. Name the main role players in the design process of this hospital.
3. Explain how they went about in getting the employees to “buy-in” the design
process.
4. Identify the strategies used to address the key hazards.
Answers will be discussed online on lessons tools.
The definition of safe design clearly stipulates that hazards and risks needs to be
integrated to enhance the health and safety of employees by reducing risks. It is
important to understand the difference and association between a hazard and a risk.
Fit for Work (2016) explains that a hazard is something that can cause harm and a risk
is the chance that any hazard will cause harm. Risk is associated with how much harm
can be caused by a hazard.
To refresh your memory on the difference between a hazard and a risk, watch the
following video: The difference between a hazard and a risk by Holmesglen (2:55).
Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToaVW4nSdBA
The Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Act 85 of 1993 defines a hazard as a
source of or exposure to danger and risk as the probability to injure or damage
something. The OHS Act further states that identifying hazards and evaluating risks
associated with a hazard is mandatory and that employers need to take the necessary
steps to comply with the provisions of the Act. The OHS Act also stipulates that any
person who designs, manufactures, imports, sells or supplies articles to be used at a
workplace must ensure as far as reasonably practicable that those articles are safe
and without risks and comply with the prescribed requirements. McKinnon (2020)
defines a hazard as a situation or behaviour that has potential to cause injury or illness
to people, damage equipment/property or harm the environment.
Installers and
maintenance
technicians need
to be trained and
take necessary
precautions to
minimise the risk
Hazard identification is not enough when it comes to safe design. All the stakeholders
of the design process need to assess the risks associated with the identified hazards.
Risk assessment therefore is the overall process or method used to identify the risk
factors that have the potential to cause harm. These identified risk factors from the
hazards needs to be analysed and evaluated. By analysing and evaluating the risks,
appropriate ways to manage and control it can be determined. It is important to
remember that a hazard that can’t be eliminated, the risk it poses needs to be
controlled (H&SA, n.d.). With a risk assessment, the risks that the identified hazards
pose are assessed to determine the likelihood of harm, such as injury or illnesses and
their severity. When risk assessment is done in the safe design process, the methods
and procedures of specific activities (jobs) and areas will be considered, as well as the
potential exposure of employees. A risk assessment will assess how serious the risks
are and how to manage it through elimination or reduction (H&SA, n.d.).
Hazard identification is the first step in the hazard identification and risk assessment
(HIRA) process (McKinnon, 2020). Emergency Management Ontario (2012) describe
the HIRA process as a risk assessment tool that can be used to assess hazards that
pose the greatest risks in terms of how likely they can occur and how great the
potential impact may be on individuals, property or environment. McKinnon (2020)
further explains that the HIRA process aims at considering the likely future events and
their possible consequences by following the proposed steps:
Step 5
Step 1
It is the legal duty of an employer to assess the risk faced by their employees. The
employer must conduct a systematically check for the common classification of
hazards, namely:
• Physical – for example lifting, awkward postures, slips and trips, noise, dust and
machinery.
• Mental – for example workload, working hours, bullying and psychosocial
hazard, such as stress
• Chemical – for example asbestos and cleaning substances
• Biological – for example tuberculosis, hepatitis and other infectious diseases
Step 2
Who is at risk? (Full-time employees, part-time employees, contractors, visitors,
clients, members of the public)
All work locations and situations, the legal requirements, regulations and standards
must be considered.
Step 3
In this step you must assess the risks and take preventive action. The risk must be
reduced to an acceptable level. Remember, not all risks can be removed, and the level
of the risk plays a vital role. The risk levels include high, medium or low.
Step 4
Records of the findings must be in writing and should include details of the hazards
and the action taken to reduce or eliminate the risks. The records must be kept
serving as proof that a risk assessment was carried out and it will also form the basis
for a later review. The risk assessment is a working document and must be
transparent and available for anybody to read.
Step 5
The risk assessment, as a working document, must be continuously reviewed and
updated. This ensures that actions taken are applied and that new working practices,
new machinery or any changes to the work conducted are documented.
1. Hazards and risks are part of everyday life and need to be understood in
order to control and manage it. Distinguish between hazards and risks.
2. Watch the following video: How sugar is made from sugar beets by
Amalgamated Sugar Company (5:49) https://youtu.be/TDSe-1pdwhY
3. Read the following case study and identify at least three (3) types of hazards
and provide the classification of each.
4. Rate the risk level for each of the hazards named in question 3.
One of the activities involved in processing sugar beet into sugar, involve evaluating
the quality of beet. This process is done by washing the beet with high pressure water
jets in several washers (1:03 – 1:20), before the sugar beet can be sliced and
weighed. The water jets striking on the beet and the rotating cage of each washer, as
well as the hopper causes a continuous noise. This equipment generates a noise level
as high as 107dB. This causes employees working in the direct vicinity of the
equipment and even those working away from the equipment to be irritable because
verbal communication between them were distorted, leading to the reduction of
productivity and an increase in negative human behaviour. Any modifications the
factory considered needed to fit within a very limited space and both the washers and
the hopper which had to be rugged and waterproof. In the end the factory
management decided to implement low-cost modifications such as improved ear
protection for the operators and vibration damping materials.
Source: Health and Safety Executive (HSE), n.d. – adapted and changed
The risks considered in the risk assessment needs to be analysed and evaluated. The
ranking of the risks can be done by using a risk matrix. A risk matrix is a visual diagram
to determine the severity of the risk and whether the risk is sufficiently controlled.
The risk matrix will be explained in more detail in one of the following learning units.
For the purpose of this learning unit, we will only discuss the basics of the risk matrix.
A risk matrix consists of mainly two dimensions, namely severity (consequences) and
probability (likelihood / frequency). Severity in this context refer to in the severity from
the perspective of human life or from the perspective of damage to the facility,
environment, equipment and so on. The severity can be classified for people,
environment, assets and reputation (PEAR). The severity can have an impact on more
than one perspective. Probability refers to the possibility of an event to happen and is
often refer to as the frequency, meaning how many times there is a possibility to
happen (CGE Academy, 2017).
Figure 2.3: Example of a simple risk matrix
Most risk matrix diagrams consist of the following three areas: (i) the area with a low
probability, indicating in an event the risk is not high; (ii) the area with a medium
probability, indicating in an event, the risk is judged to be monitored, but still controlled
and kept as low as reasonably practicable; and (iii) the area with a high probability in
case of an event and would include severity, indicating that more control measures
should be used to bring the probability or severity of the risk down (CGE Academy,
2017). McKinnon (2020) suggest that employees should be trained to use a simple
risk matrix as this tool will assist in ranking the risks. McKinnon (2020) further suggests
that a risk matrix should form part of the risk reporting system.
On the discussion forum on the myUnisa module site, name the South African Act that
requires the protection of all people involved in any business and explain your
understanding of this Act and the relationship it has with safety risk assessment.
2.7 Hazard reduction methods
Hazards exist all around us and form part of our everyday life. The control of hazards
in a workplace can be done by a hazard control programme that will provide the
necessary steps to protect employees from exposure to these hazards. Controlling
hazards are not an easy task and will include a risk assessment to evaluate and
prioritise the identified hazards and risks (CCOHS, 2018). The hazards need to be
controlled through reduction methods.
McKinnon (2020) explains that there are five main hazard reduction methods, namely:
• Elimination
The hazard is completely removed, which will be ideal if it is done in the
design phase, but it is not always possible.
• Substitution
The hazardous process, substance, chemical is substituted with a safer or
less hazardous one, for example robotics is used in hazardous situations
instead of people or a hazardous chemical is substituted with a less
hazardous one.
This method is costly and not always feasible as it is an ongoing method.
• Engineering controls
This method includes the design or modification to equipment, ventilation
systems and processes where engineering can be used to reduce the
source of exposure.
For example: the barrier between a worker and the hazard will be the
machine guard, which will be part of the design phase of the machine. The
machine guard will be the engineering control.
Engineering controls are most suitable in controlling hazards as hazard
controls are designed to remove a hazard at the source, meaning that it
prevents the hazard to get to the employee.
Although engineering controls are initially expensive, in the long run it would
be much more cost effective and feasible for a business.
• Administrative controls
Administrative controls include controls such as training, schedule times of
exposure and safe work procedure policies for certain task.
It assists in reducing the duration, frequency and severity of exposure to
hazards and hazardous situations, for example good housekeeping
practices.
Engineering controls are in most cases more difficult to understand and implement
when we look at the hierarchy of controls. To explain engineering controls from the
concept of the hierarchy of controls, is the closes an organisation can get in eliminating
a hazard without actually eliminating it. Engineering controls are designed to fit in a
specific area. It can be a facility, a piece of equipment, or procedures to reduce a
hazard or the exposure of a hazard to an employee (Simplified Safety, n.d.).
Engineering controls can therefore be defined as a physical modification to a process,
equipment, or installation, aimed at preventing harm to people, environment, and the
equipment or facility (Bullock & Ignacio, 2006). The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (2015) explain that engineering controls protect workers by removing
hazardous conditions or placing barriers between the employee and the hazard.
Engineering controls are design to minimize interference with employees, productivity
or personal comfort and is therefore more expensive than other controls. Although the
cost of implementing engineering controls is initially high, over the long term it will be
cost saving (Centers for Disease Control, 2015).
Engineering controls are usually implemented to reduce exposure to a chemical or
physical hazard, for example ventilation systems such as a fume hood, sound
dampening materials to reduce noise levels, machine guarding, safety interlocks and
radiation shielding (ILPI, 2021).
Some risks are too much to be controlled and the organisation must decide whether
these risks are acceptable or unacceptable. This means that the organisation must
respond to those risks by using different strategies. The general strategies are:
• Risk avoidance
This is the process of avoiding or eliminating a specific threat that is too large
to accept, for example moving of the business to another city, province or
country.
• Risk mitigation
Risk mitigation is the most used strategy by organisations and is the process of
reducing risks by reducing the impact the risk can cause or by reducing the
probability of the risk occurring. This strategy is mostly used when risk control
measures are instituted and the risk cannot be avoided or accepted, for
example implementation of change to a production line.
• Risk acceptance
The consequences of a risk are accepted where the risk exists, and it cannot
be mitigated or changed. If risk acceptance is used, there must be a
contingency plan setting out what would be done if the risk occurs, for example
work with electrical equipment.
• Risk transfer
This strategy is usually used when an organisation decides to transfer the risk
to a third party, for example by insuring it. If the risk occurs, the organisation
paid insurance premiums to an insurance company (third party) that will cover
the financial consequences of the risk.
2.9 Conclusion
This learning unit emphasised safety by design and covers chapter 3, 4, 10 and 13 of
the prescribed textbook. Health and safety by design is a process of risk management
and needs to comply with design codes and standards when it comes to the health
and safety of an organisation. The ideal is for safety to start in the design process as
it will prevent accidents, incidents and occupational illnesses through the management
of hazards and risks. It is vital for designers, such as architects and engineers, as well
as all individuals involved in a business to understand the difference between hazards
and risks. The difference between a hazard and risk is where a hazard has the
potential to cause harm and risk refers to the amount of harm that caused by a hazard.
To determine the harm and the consequences of a hazard and risk, hazards need to
be identified and the risks needs to be assessed and ranked. This process is known
as the hazard identification and risk assessment (HIRA). Hazard identification is a
continuous process and aimed at the continual improvement of safety by constantly
reducing hazards. The risk assessment process aims at considering the likelihood of
occurrence and the possible consequences. Design of safety directly influence the
health and safety of an organisation and should first aim at reducing risks.
1. Explain the association between the Occupational Health and Safety Act 85 of
1993 and the design for safety.
2. Distinguish between the two main hazard identification methods.
3. Justify the risk reduction strategies.
4. Provide your understanding of a risk assessment.
5. Read the following article.
• Physical risk – the inhalation of flour dust when flour is loaded into mixers,
dusting of flour onto baking surfaces, dry sweeping of flour dust from shelves
and the floor, disposing of empty flour bags.
• Biological risk – flour is contaminated by microorganisms and pests during
harvesting, transportation and production of flour through the grains. The
number of bacteria, yeast and mould on the grains can easily contaminate the
flour. Mould poses the highest risk level as they produce dangerous toxic
metabolites and is usually caused by poor storage of the grain before the flour
making-process. Pests, such as rats and bird residues and faeces are the
main contamination sources for salmonella bacteria’s contamination to flour.
• Chemical risk – chemical contamination of grain includes pesticides and
insect faeces where the latter also contain chemicals. (Erbaş, Arslan & Durak,
n.d). Flour contains naturally chemicals such as alpha-amylase.
Bakers and other employees of bakeries are constantly exposed to allergens flour
dust, especially when weighing, pouring and operating dough mixers. Baker’s
asthma has been reported as one of the major causes of occupational diseases. A
baker is therefore a “high risk” occupation (WorkSafe British Columbia, n.d.).
Sources: Baatjies, et al (2014); Erbaş, Arslan & Durak, n.d. & Work Safe British
Columbia, n.d.) – adapted and changed
1. All stakeholders were part of the design, building and commission phases to
eliminate/control the risks of the identified hazards.
2. User groups, health and safety representatives, staff and subject matter
experts.
3. A series of prototype work areas were built and eight weeks of workflow and
scenario testing were done by staff who provided feedback. This was done to
detect any design and safety issues before the actual build started.
4. The strategies used to address the key hazards are the following: <<Author: I
added this sentence; please confirm or review. MM>>
• To reduce manual handling overhead tracking were installed to move
patients from the bed to the bathroom
• Couches which double as beds were installed to maximise space and
reduce manual handling.
• To eliminate manual handling, electronic bed movers were installed.
• To reduce traffic back-up, a u-shape driveway was built at the loading
dock to allow trucks easy entry and exit without turning around.
Activity 2.3
i) Rotating drill bit – engineering controls (barrier, e.g., machine guard)
Administrative controls (training, procedures)
PPE
ii) Sharp tooling and edges on the workpiece – administrative controls
(training, procedures)
PPE
iii) Flying or rotating objects – engineering controls (machine guard)
Administrative controls (training, procedures)
PPE
1. Safe design or the design for safety is clearly stipulated in the OHS Act 85 of
1993 under various regulations. The Act sets the minimum standards of design
and stipulate the duties of designers to ensure the health and safety of an
organisation’s employees.
2. There are two hazard identification methods that can be used, namely
comparative and fundamental methods.
With the comparative hazard identification method checklists, hazard indices,
review of historical data and facilitated inspections and audits can be used.
To identify hazards by using the fundamental method tools such as the
HAZOPS, FMEA, FMECA, HIRA and failure logic can be used.
With both methods, it is important to remember that if something poses danger
and can harm a person or the environment, it is considered a hazard.
3. There are four (4) risk reduction strategies that can be used in reducing risks in
an organisation. These risk reduction strategies are:
Risk avoidance – where the risk is avoided or eliminated as the risk is too
large, for example moving offices.
Risk mitigation – this strategy is often use where the impact of the risk is
reduced because the risk cannot be avoided or accepted, for example change
to a production line.
Risk acceptance – this strategy is used when the risk cannot be changed or
mitigated, so the risk is accepted with a contingency plan, specifying what must
be done should the risk occur, for example working with electric equipment.
4. A risk assessment can only be done after a hazard identification was done. The
risks need to be analysed and evaluated. The risk assessment will consider the
likelihood of occurrence and the possible consequences. This means that the
severity of the risk is evaluated which can be done by a risk matrix.
4.1 Flour dust exposure may cause occupational illness and diseases and poses
the hazard of combustion.
4.2 Ventilation system – to reduce the inhalation of flour dust as the flour dust is
extracted through the ventilation system.
Mixers with lids – when the flour is poured into the mixers, the lid will reduce
the amount of flour dust escaping into the atmosphere and its inhalation will be
reduced.
(** Student’s own discretion).
References
2.10
Amalgamated Sugar Company. 2017. How sugar is made from sugarbeets (5:49).
Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDSe-1pdwhY [Accessed on 19
August 2021].
Bullock, WH & Ignacio, JS (eds). 2006. A strategy for assessing and managing
occupational exposures. 3rd edition. American Industrial Hygiene Association,
Fairfax, VA.
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS). 2018. Hazard
control. Available from:
https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/hsprograms/hazard_control.html#:~:text=Eliminati
on%20is%20the%20process%20of,should%20be%20used%20whenever%20possibl
e. [Accessed on 21 September 2020].
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2015. Engineering controls. Available
from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/engcontrols/default.html [Accessed on 20 August
2021].
Erbaş, M, Arslan,S & Durak AN. n.d. Food safety risks in flour and hygiene and
sanitation in flour mills for producing safe flour. In Miller World milling and pulses
Technologies Refereed Magazine. Available from:
https://millermagazine.com/english/food-safety-risks-in-flour-and-hygiene-and-
sanitation-in-flour-mills-for-producing-safe-flour/.html [Accessed on: 20 August 2021].
Fit for Work. 2016. The distinction between hazards and risks in occupational health
and safety. Fit for Work Blog, blog post, 30 March. Available from:
https://fitforwork.org/blog/the-distinction-between-hazards-and-risks-in-occupational-
health/ [Accessed on 15 September 2020].
Health and Safety Executive. n.d. Hair salon case study. Available from:
https://www.hse.gov.uk/risk/casestudies/hairsalon.htm [Accessed on 19 August
2021].
Health and Safety Executive. n.d. Sugar beet processing. Available from:
https://www.hse.gov.uk/noise/casestudies/sugarbeet.htm [Accessed on 19 August
2021].
McKinnon, RC. 2020. The design, implementation and audit of occupational health
and safety management. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
Simplified Safety. n.d. The hierarchy of controls, part two: engineering controls.
Available from: https://simplifiedsafety.com/blog/the-hierarchy-of-controls-part-two-
engineering-controls/ [Accessed 20 August 2021].
Sitesafe. 2019. Safety in design in construction: an introduction. Available from:
https://www.sitesafe.org.nz/globalassets/guides-and-resources/health-and-safety-
guides/safetyindesigninconstructionguide.pdf [Accessed on 16 August 2021].
SolveXia. 2019. 5 Types of risk mitigation strategies for business success Blog, blog
post, 7 November. Available from: https://www.solvexia.com/blog/5-types-of-risk-
mitigation-strategies [Accessed on 22 September 2020].
Verge. 2019. How to properly layout your work area Blog, blog post 10 September.
Available from: https://www.vergesafetybarriers.com.au/how-to-properly-layout-your-
work-area/ [Accessed on 22 September 2020].
WorkSafe Australia. 2021. Case study: St John of God Hospital Berwick. Available
from: https://www.worksafe.vic.gov.au/case-study-st-john-god-hospital-berwick
[Accessed on 17 August 2021].
WorkSafe British Columbia. n.d. Exposure to flour dust at work can cause asthma.
WorkSafe Bulletin. Available from: file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/ws0703-pdf-
en.pdf [Accessed on 20 August 2021].
Worksmart. n.d. What are the five steps to risk assessment? Available from:
https://worksmart.org.uk/health-advice/health-and-safety/hazards-and-risks/what-
are-five-steps-risk-assessment [Accessed on 16 September 2020].
LEARNING UNIT 3: ERGONOMICS AND PREVENTION
Learning outcomes
On completion of this learning unit and chapter 64 in the prescribed textbook, you
should be able to:
1. Identify and describe the subject fields and ergonomic domains necessary for
the design of safety.
2. Interpret ergonomic principles in the workplace for more efficient and effective
prevention.
3. Apply ergonomic principles of human-centred designs.
4. Explain the rationale and benefits of human-centred design.
5. Identify and relate ergonomic risk factors through a systematic ergonomic risk
assessment process.
6. Develop appropriate control measures for ergonomic risk factors.
7. Design a safer and healthier workplace according to good ergonomic principles.
Key concepts
Ergonomics
Human factor engineering
Ergonomic principles
Human-centred design (HCD)
Ergonomic risk factors
3.1 Introduction
Have you ever experienced a sharp pain in your shoulder and arm when you work on
your computer? Is this pain consistent when you work on a computer? The pain
becomes persistent. Do you need to see a doctor about it? If you answered yes to
these questions, it might be that your workstation design in your workplace needs an
evaluation. The ergonomic design of your workstation may not be effective.
Ergonomics therefore can be described as the process of designing or arranging
workplaces, products and systems to fit the people who work and use them
(Dohrmann Consulting, 2014). McKinnon (2020) explains that ergonomics is also
known as human factor engineering and that ergonomics is concerned with the
interaction between an employee and a machine within a workplace. Ergonomics
became a buzz word for organisations as it aims at improving a workplace by minimise
risk of injury or harm and to create a safe, healthy, comfortable and productive
workplace (Dohrmann Consulting, 2014). In general terms ergonomics aims at
matching machines, equipment and the environment to humans in such a way that it
will maximise performance, reduce errors and injuries caused by repetitive or awkward
motions and positions due to the incorrect matching of the employee and the job they
do (McKinnon, 2020). McKinnon (2020) further explains that if an organisation has an
effective ergonomics safety programme, errors and injury will be reduced and safety
will improve.
There are new ergonomic regulations submitted in the Occupational Health and Safety
Act, published in Government Notice No. R. 42894 of December 2019. The new
Ergonomic Regulations (2019) clearly define the most used terminology in the
ergonomic field and specifies that it is the duty of employers to provide a training
programme incorporating the scope and content of the ergonomic regulations and
risks. The Ergonomic Regulations (2019) also provide guidelines to the designers,
manufacturers, importers and suppliers in optimising human well-being and system
performance.
Watch online:
Workplace ergonomics by ACS Process Systems (7:12)
https://youtu.be/HbESSXKbGec
McKinnon (2020) suggests that three main areas/domains need to be covered when
it comes to designing an ergonomic safety programme. These domains are:
• Work physiology – use of energy (e.g., type and amount of energy used to
perform a task
• Environmental physiology – effects the physical environment has on the
workplace (e.g., workplace temperature)
Watch online:
Ergonomics at workplace/types of ergonomics/benefits/ergonomic evaluation
techniques by Tetrahedron (3:00)
https://youtu.be/pHc89bejapU
3.3 Ergonomic principles
It must be understood that ergonomics is much more than a proper posture of
employees. Ergonomics include how the workplace and equipment can be best used
and designed for the safety, comfort, efficiency and productivity of employees. The
workplace, products and systems must therefore be effectively designed and arranged
so that it fit the people who use them, and the maximum output can be obtained from
them (Adhikari, 2018). To design and arrange a workplace, equipment and so on, to
obtain the maximum output, Heller-Ono (2018) explains that a person’s physical,
mental, organisational and environmental demands of the job need to be considered.
Adhikari (2018) identified the following fundamental principles of ergonomics:
Mechanically assist
Pressure point
Padding
Eddie works on an engine assembly line. He uses a handheld impact wrench to fit a
component to an engine. The assembly line makes up to 2400 engines a day and it
takes approximately three seconds to tighten each component.
In addition to the risk from using a vibrating tool, Eddie often had to adopt poor
postures to reach some parts of the engine. He had to repeatedly stretch out his arm
and constrain his posture while tightening the adapter. After a few weeks Eddie found
that he was leaving work with shoulder and neck pain. One tea break, Eddie’s line
manager saw him rubbing his neck and shoulder and recognised that the pain could
be due to the type of work Eddie was doing. The line manager spoke with Eddie and
then told the company health and safety officer about what she had seen. The
company assessed the work by considering ergonomics principles and, after getting
ideas from the workforce, came up with the following modifications:
• They replaced the impact wrench with one with minimal reaction force so that
little shock was transmitted to the hand. They also suspended the wrench, so
Eddie didn’t have to support its weight.
• They modified the workplace layout, so workers had better access to all sides
of the engine, avoiding the need to adopt poor working postures.
• They implemented a job rotation scheme so the five workers on the line were
moved around a number of different tasks. Some of these tasks still required
the use of vibrating tools, but the overall personal exposure was halved.
Example:
Human-centred design refers to addressing three core human needs, namely
physical, emotional and mental. Physical needs refer to the office furniture in a
specific workspace and should “fit” the users in the best way possible. That is why
the “Hip Chair” by Sunon is a good example of a human centered design. This
chair will maximise comfort and ergonomics as it allows the back of the chair to
adapt to the movement of the human hips. The structure will accommodate the
human body’s movement and with innovative design synchronise the system
(Sunon, 2020). To address the emotional and mental core need with this human
centred design: if the user of the “hip chair” feels comfortable, he/she will be more
motivated and energetic to perform optimal and will therefore stimulate the mental
well-being of the user, which will improve on the overall work behaviour and
practice.
2. Go to the following website and complete the Hazard Zone Jobs Checklist and
apply it to your own workplace.
https://ergo-plus.com/wp-content/uploads/Hazard-Zone-Checklist.pdf
** Remember the pictures are merely an example. You must apply the checklist
to your own workplace.
Example:
Awkward posture:
Picture 1 illustrates men working with their hand(s) above their heads or elbows
above the shoulders. If a task in your workplace requires hands above the head
or elbows above the shoulders, “tick” the block and explain briefly what this task
is, and the requirements in the “Comment/Observations” block.
4.1 Name seven (7) injuries and disorders affecting the musculoskeletal
system.
4.2 Justify why the prevention of MSD requires a partnership between an
employer and employees.
5. Distinguish between the three (3) main areas that McKinnon (2020) suggests
should be included in an ergonomic safety programme.
Answer will be online on lessons tools.
Activity 3.1
c) The workforce are those workers that work daily with the equipment and will
best know what works for them and what not.
d) The following are the ergonomics control measures used by the company:
Ergonomics measure control Effect of the control
Engineering control The wrench was replaced with a more
ergonomic tool (less vibration)
The wrench was now mechanical assist.
Work practice control Modifying of workplace layout for better
access and reducing awkward body
posture.
Job rotation control This control measure will reduce
exposure to vibration.
Reduce fatigue as the workers on the
production line will move around.
This is a job/task enlargement as they
will do several different tasks.
Proper body mechanics The workers need to undergo
refreshment training in proper work
techniques after implementing the
modifications done to the production line
(workplace).
Activity 3.2 Human centred design in the workplace
Key human centred design elements Example
i. Community Employees get to know each other which
Collaborative furniture and social spaces build trust and effective brainstorming
in workplace let employees connect and can take place.
build work relationships.
Justify human centred design in your own workplace and provide recommendations.
** Here the student can use their own discretion to explain their workplace
according to the answer in number 1 above.
3.7 Self-assessment questions
1.1
Analyse the
employee surveys
Do employee survey
and information to
(if not done)
form a framework of
ergonomic risks
2. Refer to the example and use your own discretion when you complete the
checklist.
OR
4.2 It is the responsibility of the employer to provide a safe work environment. There
must be proper ergonomic principles, applicable to the type of workplace.
Employees must receive proper training.
The organisation must have a positive safety culture that promotes ergonomics
in the workplace.
Every employee needs to take responsibility for the health and safety of their
bodies.
Employees need to report any ergonomic problems as soon as possible.
5. The following are the three (3) main areas that McKinnon (2020) should be
included in an ergonomic safety programme:
• Work physiology – use of energy (e.g., type and amount of energy used to
perform a task
• Environmental physiology – effects the physical environment has on the
workplace (e.g., workplace temperature)
References
ACS Process Systems. 2020. Workplace ergonomics [online video]. Available from:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbESSXKbGec&feature=youtu.be [Accessed on
07 November 2020].
Adhikari, S. 2018. Ergonomics and its 10 principles. Blog, blog post, 25 August.
Available from: https://www.publichealthnotes.com/ergonomics-and-its-10-principles/
[Accessed on 04 October 2020].
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS). 2020. Working in a
standing position – basic information. Available from:
https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/ergonomics/standing/standing_basic.html
[Accessed on 04 October 2020].
Chartered Institute of Ergonomics & Human Factors. n.d. What is ergonomics? Find
out how it makes life better. Available from:
https://www.ergonomics.org.uk/Public/Resources/What_is_Ergonomics_.aspx
[Accessed on 07 November 2020].
Devex. 2016. DevExplains: What is human-centered design – and why does it matter?
(3:18). Available at: http://youtu.be/0bxtEqM2TQU. [Accessed on 12 August 2021].
Dohrmann Consulting. 2014. What is ergonomics? Blog, blog post, 2014. Available
from: https://www.ergonomics.com.au/what-is-ergonomics/ [Accessed on 29
September 2020].
Heller-Ono, A. 2018. Ergonomic principles every business needs to know – for office
and material handling success. Available from:
https://www.worksiteinternational.com/hubfs/documents/ergonomic-principles-every-
business-needs-to-know.pdf?t=1524267665581 [Accessed on 04 October 2020].
HSE@Work. 2014. The best information of ergonomics. Blog, blog post, 2 August.
Available from: http://health-safety-work.blogspot.com/2014/08/the-best-information-
of-ergonomics.html [Accessed on 04 October 2020].
Middlesworth, M. 2013. Ergonomic risk factors and control methods. Available from:
https://ergo-plus.com/wp-content/uploads/Ergonomic-Risk-Factors.pdf [Accessed on
04 October 2020].
SafetyInfo.com. 2015. Ergonomics – Safety Training Video Course. Available from:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoTClRRQ7bM. [Accessed on: 12 August 2021].
Shutterstock (a). n.d. Check your body posture. Work at desk. Image ID: 619794149.
Available from:
https://image.shutterstock.com/z/stock-vector-correct-sitting-at-desk-posture-
ergonomics-advices-for-office-workers-how-to-sit-at-desk-when-619794149.jpg
[Accessed on 07 November 2020].
Learning outcomes
On completion of this learning unit and chapters 29 and 32 in the prescribed textbook,
you should be able to:
Key concepts
Life cycle
Project vs programme
Plan-do-check-act (PDCA) cycle
Safety inspection
Housekeeping programme
4.1 Introduction
In this learning unit, we will look at prevention of incidents in the workplace during the
life cycle stages of different programmes/systems. The design, implementation and
audit of an occupational health and safety management system will be emphasised by
examining an effective housekeeping programme (chapter 29) that an organisation
can implement to measure performance and to implement prevention management
during the life cycle stages of different systems. The business order (housekeeping
programme) in chapter 29 of the prescribed textbook will be the starting point. The
focus will then move to safety inspections in chapter 32 of the prescribed textbook. It
is important to look at measuring performance to assess the effectiveness of the
different programmes and to take corrective action if necessary.
** Please refer to the following websites for more information regarding safety
management programmes:
• https://www.ehsinsight.com/blog/5-steps-to-developing-an-effective-
workplace-safety-program
• https://www.safeopedia.com/definition/4987/safety-program#what-does-
safety-program-mean
Althaqafi and Elssy (2015) explain that most organisations aim at integrating their
occupational health and safety management system with their other project
management systems. Althaqafi and Elssy (2015) further explain that this integration
is mainly to eliminate the possible work-related injuries and illnesses that may occur
during the life cycle of a project. Karaulova, Kramarenko and Shevtshendo (2008)
suggest that risk factors form part of the life cycle of a project and it is vital that the risk
factors are identified and mitigated to manage projects successfully.
From the previous section, we can assume that there is a close link between the life
cycle stages of a project and the life cycle stages of a safety programme. Watts (2014)
suggest that there are four general phases that forms a project life cycle. These
phases are:
Initiation phase
During this stage the objectives need to be identified as a safety problem or
opportunity.
Planning phase
This phase collaborates on the safety problem and consists of as much detail as
possible. All the work/tasks need to be identified, resources needed and strategies to
reach the set objectives.
Implementation (execution) phase
The designed plan that was created in the planning stage is put into motion during this
phase. The implementation of the work/tasks are continuously monitored and
adjustments are made to the original plan if necessary.
To learn more about the implementation phase of a safety programme, study the
information in the provided webpage:
Closing phase
This is the completion of the work/tasks and inventory of lessons-learned is done. This
means that the whole project is analysed and reported back to the organisation. Data
will be available for future projects and possible problems experienced during the
implementation phase will serve as a framework.
(Source: Watts, 2014 – adapted by author)
When it comes to the life cycle of a safety programme or safety system, the is not a
clear set of phases. McKinnon (2020) suggest that all safety systems consists of a
design phase, implementation phase and an auditing phase, where the latter is
fundamentally the evaluation phase. Althaqafi and Elssy (2015) suggest that the safety
life cycle is a process consisting of an occupational health and safety policy, planning,
implementation and measurement and the last phase, being the review and
improvement phase. The Health and Safety Executive (n.d.) suggest that the plan, do,
check, act (PDCA) approach can also be used as a safety life cycle. Althaqafi and
Elssy (2015) provide an example how a safety programme life cycle can be integrated
into a project life cycle.
Table 4.1: Integration of project management life cycle into safety management
programme life cycle
Project management life cycle Safety management programme life cycle
Initiation Commitment and policy
Planning Health and safety planning
Execution and control Implementation and measuring
Completion Review and improvement
For the purpose of this learning unit, we will use the PDCA cycle as the process to
explain the different safety life cycles of safety programmes we are going to explore.
4.2.3 Plan, do, check, act cycle
The PDCA cycle is simple and powerful to use as it is systematic, straightforward and
a flexible cycle that can be used to continuously improve safety and performance
within a workplace (Patel & Deshpande, 2017). The PDCA cycle contains four
continuous repetitive stages. These stages are explained by hand of the following
illustration:
The four-step approach of the PDCA cycle makes it possible to find the best solution
to identified problems before the programme or system is implemented. The problem-
solving process of the PDCA cycle can be refined and continuously used by any
department of an organisation (East West Manufacturing, 2015).
** Please see annexure A for an example how the PDCA cycle can be applied to a
good housekeeping programme. It is very important to study this example, because
you will be required to compile a safety programme for your assessment.
The main purpose of an inspection is to identify hazards that may cause damage and
loss. With the identification of hazards, the amount of risk can be determined and can
be classified into:
A – High risk
B – Medium risk
C – Moderate risk
Inspections need to consider the workplace, the movement of material, raw product,
finished goods, working conditions, action and behaviour of employees and the
general health and safety of the employees. When these aspects are identified,
positive remedial measures need to be taken to rectify problems through a problem-
solving process where the PDCA cycle can be used (Annexure A).
An inspection therefore assists in identifying hazards and risks in order to plan for
corrective action and forms part of the proactive safety process. Inspections contribute
to the measurement of performance and is also contributing to monitoring rectified
problems (McKinnon, 2020).
Activity 4.2
An office environment poses fewer hazards and risks. Although the hazards and
risks are fewer, it still needs to be controlled to ensure a safe workplace. Consider
the following video: Office safety workplace training by Safetycare – Manual handling
(2:12), available at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsLZWCIWZJQ&list=RDCMUCz4xKjcRNnNn2N
cnlhaBxFQ&index=3.
1. Consider your own workplace and design an office safety programme. Use the
life cycle process and what inspection you are going to use.
There are numerous unsafe acts happening in this workplace, a typical example of
bad housekeeping.
1. Although there are numerous unsafe acts presented in the picture, identify at
least five (5) hazards that can be associated with bad housekeeping.
2. Classify the potential risks of the identified hazards and explain why you use
that classification.
3. Go to the following website:
https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/hsprograms/house.html
a) Explain what you understand about a housekeeping programme.
b) Provide the benefits of an effective housekeeping programme.
c) Identify the elements of an effective housekeeping programme.
4. Apply the PDCA cycle to one (1) of the identified hazards.
4.4 Conclusion
This learning unit distinguished between a project and a programme. The main
difference is that a project has a start and end, whereby a programme can consist of
a group of related projects and is an ongoing process. Most occupational health and
safety management system are integrated with other project management systems to
eliminate possible occupational injuries and losses that may occur during the life cycle
of a project. A project life cycle consists of in initiation phase, planning phase,
implementation phase and closing phase. A safety system/programme life cycle does
not have clearly defined phases and would consist of a safety policy, planning,
implementation, measurement and review and improvement phase. This cycle will
then be repeated and is ongoing. The PDCA cycle can be used as a tool to
continuously improve safety and performance within a workplace and aims to find the
best solution to identified problems (hazards) before the safety programme or system
is implemented. An inspection of a workplace/area assists in identifying hazards and
risks in order to plan for corrective action and forms part of the proactive safety
process. Inspections contribute to the measurement of performance and is also
contributing to monitoring rectified problems. The uniqueness of the organisation and
work areas determine what type of inspection can be used.
4.5 References
Althaqafi, T & Elssy, B. 2015. Integrating occupational health and safety systems into
a project management system. International Journal of Research in Management &
Business Studies, 2(2), 35-38. Available from: http://ijrmbs.com/vol2issue2/torky.pdf
[Accessed on 10 October 2020].
Blackburn, L. 2019. Spot the hazards/dangers. ESL Worksheets. Available from:
https://en.islcollective.com/english-esl-worksheets/vocabulary/jobs-and-work/spot-
hazards/dangers/112866 [Accessed on 19 October 2020].
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS). 2018. Workplace
housekeeping – Basic guide. Available from:
https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/hsprograms/house.html [Accessed on 28 July
2021].
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS). 2020. Workplace
inspections. Available from: https://ohsguide.worksafenb.ca/topic/inspections.html
[Accessed on 19 October 2020].
East West Manufacturing. 2015. How to implement the PDCA cycle (Plan-do-check-
act). Blog, blog post 04 August. Available from: https://news.ewmfg.com/blog/how-to-
implement-the-pdca-cycle-plan-do-check-act-in-any-department [Accessed on 14
October 2020].
Health and Safety Executive (HSE). n.d. A brief summary of plan, do, check, act.
Available from: https://www.hse.gov.uk/managing/plan-do-check-act.htm [Accessed
on 12 October 2020]
McKinnon, RC. 2020. The design, implementation and audit of occupational health
and safety management. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
Patel, PM & Deshpande, VA. 2017. Application of plan-do-check-act cycle for quality
and productivity improvement – a review. International Journal for Research in Applied
Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET), 5(1), 197-201. Available from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318743952_Application_Of_Plan-Do-
Check-Act_Cycle_For_Quality_And_Productivity_Improvement-A_Review [Accessed
on 12 October 2020].
Safetycare. 2014. Office safety workplace training. Video. Safetycare free preview –
Manual handling. Available from:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsLZWCIWZJQ&list=RDCMUCz4xKjcRNnNn2N
cnlhaBxFQ&index=3 [Accessed on 28 July 2021].
United States Department of Labor. n.d. Recommended practices for safety and
health programs. Available from:
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:GZMm7YZcWzQJ:https://
www.osha.gov/safety-management+&cd=12&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=za [Accessed on 27
July 2021].
Root cause
solution to the
problem
• Investigate if
problem still
exist
• Repeat, do and
check phase if
necessary
• Review Implementation tasks for long-term countermeasures
performance Task Assigned to Deadline Completed
• Inspection Monitoring of housekeeping Supervisors and Every shift
4: Act
Learning outcomes
On completion of this learning unit and chapters 43 and 44 in the prescribed textbook,
you should be able to:
Key concepts
Safety reporting systems
Accident
Incident
Near miss incident
Major loss event
Injury
First aid injury
Disabling injury
Event
Safety culture
Safety reporting culture
5.1 Introduction
In any type of organisation there are many hazards and risks that can adversely affect
the success and safe operations of the organisation. An employer has a legal duty to
provide a safe and healthy workplace and employees have a duty to report safety
concerns to the management. The management has the responsibility to investigate
the reported safety concerns by means of a documented risk management process
(SMS Pro, n.d.).
Employees should feel free to report safety issues and incidents without the fear of
retaliation, victimisation or personal reprimand. Employees should get recognition for
reporting incidents such as near misses and the organisational management should
act after reports are received to indicate that they take employee reporting serious
(McKinnon, 2020). An organisation with a positive safety culture where there is open
communication, mutual trust, shared vision of the importance of safety and health, will
embrace a safety reporting system.
The Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS, 2020) defines an
incident as an occurrence, condition or situation arising in a workplace that results in
or could result in injuries, illnesses, ill health or death, as well as damage to property
and theft. An incident is unexpected and may not cause injury or damage at the time
of the incident, but it has the potential to injure or cause damage.
The terms “incident” and “accident” are often used interchangeably in the management
of health and safety. This is simply because most legislation, such as the Occupational
Health and Safety (OHS) Act, 85 of 1993 covers both and “accident” and “incident”
under the term “incident” as “accident” implies that the event was related to fate or
chance (CCOHS, 2020).
From the videos, it is clear that safety reporting is important, no matter what type of
industry. A safety reporting system will include data on accidents, incidents, near
misses and could also include occupational injuries and illnesses (Alli, 2008). The
safety reporting system should be customised to fit the type of workplace and
organisation. Traditional elements included in a safety reporting system will relate to:
An effective safety reporting system, with a comprehensive data base, will assist in
identifying safety hazards, risks, prioritise resources, develop interventions to mitigate
the hazards and risks and to evaluate the interventions to reduce harm. It will also
benefit the organisation in managing costs, which include the costs associated with
healthcare, injury and wrongful death lawsuits, insurance premiums, government fines
and so on (O’Neill & Wolfe, 2017).
Another benefit of a safety reporting system is to demonstrate the organisation’s
compliance with legislation and regulations, as such a system will show that the
organisation’s policies and procedures are in place to provide a healthy and safe work
environment and that the organisation takes a pro-active approach in health and safety
(Bianca, n.d.)
The videos clearly portray what a safety culture is and now we can look at how
important a safety culture is to be linked to a safety reporting system.
From the above, it is vital that an organisation establishes and maintains a successful
safety reporting system. To enable a successful reporting system the organisation
should have a healthy and successful safety culture as a safety reporting system forms
an integral part of an organisation’s safety culture.
Employee
engagement Safety rules and
Teamwork procedures
Figure 5.4: Safety reporting system being part of the safety culture
(Source: Shutterstock, ID: 439243810 – adapted and changed)
Safety culture can be defined as a set of shared attitudes, beliefs and practices
amongst employees at all levels of an organisation. A healthy, successful and positive
safety culture will connect all the employees around a common goal, such as a
successful safety reporting system (Safesite, 2020). A strong safety culture requires
the involvement of the whole organisation. An organisation should pay close attention
to every employee’s contribution so that safety becomes personal and a healthy,
positive safety cultural can be formed. Common elements of a strong and positive
safety culture include:
• Shared values
• Contribution and engagement from all employees from all levels of the
organisation
• Transparency
• Continual learning
• Proactive, rather than reactive solutions to problems (Safesite, 2020).
An organisation with a strong and positive safety culture will have an impact on incident
reduction and fewer at-risk behaviours. It will also impact on the incident rate, which
will be lower and other organisational management matters, such as low turnover, low
absenteeism and high productivity.
The main purpose of a safety reporting system is to learn from mistakes of previous
incidents and near misses. It is vital to determine the causes of incidents and near
misses and an effective way to determine that is by using the safety reporting system.
The main barrier in developing and establishing an effective safety reporting culture is
that the general feeling among employees is that with reporting near misses, where
there was no injury, damage or loss, these types of incidents are overseen and ignored
(Williamsen, 2013).
Steps in developing and establishing an effective safety culture
Douglas et al (2014) suggest that the following elements will also contribute to
developing an effective safety reporting culture:
• There is a visible commitment to the safety reporting system by the top
management.
• The middle management is actively involved in promoting the safety reporting
system.
• Employees are encouraged to be engaged and actively participate in the safety
reporting system.
• The safety reporting system is flexible and accommodate the different work
areas.
• The safety reporting system is easy to use and free of intimidation of
employees.
• The safety reporting system is perceived as positive by the employees in the
knowledge and recognition that what is reported will be respected and acted
upon.
• The safety reporting system forms part of the organisation’s safety and
reporting cultures.
• The safety reporting system reflects the organisation’s level of safety and
serves as a proactive tool to enhance the safety of employees.
The cable caught fire, burned and the Y phase fuse blew off and the web sling also
burned. Electricians immediately reached the spot and disconnected the power supply
of the incoming cable. There was no human injury.
Source: RLS Human Care, n.d. – Adapted and changed by author.
1. Does this case study portray an accident, incident or a near miss incident?
2. Provide two probable causes for the incident.
3. Identify three lessons learnt or recommendations to apply proactive safety
actions.
4. Use your safety reporting form (compiled and developed in activity 5.1) to report
the incident described in the case study.
5. From your answers, justify the safety culture of this organisation.
Organisations that take near miss incidents seriously will implement a near miss
reporting system that will form part of the safety reporting system and the safety
management system. Before a near miss incident reporting system can be
implemented, it is necessary to provide training to employees to recognise near miss
incidents and how to report such incidents (McKinnon, 2020).
With the development of a near miss reporting system, McKinnon (2020) suggests
that it should be as simple as possible, portable and always available. McKinnon
(2020) further suggests that a small pocket-size card or booklet will be ideal and most
organisations with a near miss reporting system use this method of reporting.
Martinelli (2018) suggests the following aspects are important when establishing a
near miss incident reporting system:
McKinnon (2020) distinguishes between formal and informal near miss reporting
system:
Informal reporting
Formal reporting • Reporting is verbally, without
• Is the main reporting system filling in of a form or online
reporting
• A reporting form is completed
• Employee reports the near miss
incident verbally to line manager
• The form is handed to the line
or co-worker
management
5.10 Conclusion
In any workplace there are different events happening at the same time. It can be
events, such as performing tasks, communication, different processes and so on.
There can also be those events that draw the attention to what is not usually
happening, such as an accident, incident or the most often unnoticeable near miss
incident. Most events are planned with policies or programmes in place, but the
unplanned events such as accident/incident/near miss incidents need to be recorded
after it has taken place. Unfortunately, these types of reports only records what
happened in the past and do not measure the health and safety efforts and inputs of
an organisation but is vital for establishing a safety system that will protect all
stakeholders from damage and injury (McKinnon, 2020).
An organisation must establish a safety reporting system to form part of the safety
management system. The safety reporting system is developed to manage the data
regarding accidents, incidents and near misses. It is necessary for an organisation to
distinguish between an accident, incident and near miss incidents. (Please refer to the
beginning of this learning unit and ensure you know the difference between them). A
safety reporting system will include data on accidents, incidents, near misses and
could also include occupational injuries and illnesses and should be developed and
customised to fit the type of workplace and organisation. An effective and well-
established safety reporting system will reflect the organisation’s compliance to
legislation and regulations and will form an integral part of the safety management
system of the organisation.
A cornerstone for a successful reporting system is a healthy and positive safety
culture, where the latter is defined as a set of shared attitudes, beliefs and practices
among employees at all levels of an organisation, that connect these employees
around common goals. An organisation with a strong and positive safety culture will
have an impact on incident reduction and fewer at-risk behaviours. Engaged
employees and an organisation that truly focuses on health and safety will contribute
to the safety culture and safety reporting culture of the organisation.
A positive and effective safety culture and safety reporting culture will contribute to
reporting accidents, incidents and near miss incidents. Near miss incidents are often
overseen due to the lack of reporting such incidents. Most employees are fearful in
reporting near miss incidents due to retaliation from management. It is necessary that
an organisation should implement near miss reporting by using a simple, portable, and
always available system. Employees and management must take responsibility and
accountability for an effective safety reporting system.
What
What actions
accident can
can be taken to
Hazard be prevented
Example Near miss be proactive in
identified by reporting
the safety of the
the near miss
workplace?
incident?
1 Hammer falls • Hammer Head injury to • Ensuring edge
off a scaffold • Scaffold another protection and
and misses • Scaffold board worker
another • Toe board of scaffold boards
worker scaffold are in place.
• Scaffold
inspection
before it is
singed off
1.4 Name three (3) actions that can be used to prevent future near misses
and accidents.
2. Go to the following website, familiarise yourself with the content and answer the
following questions.
Bird Construction – Near Miss Safety Video 2016 by pacificproducersgrp (8:40)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrkEDpFJq2o
2.1 Identify five (5) possible causes for near miss incidents happening.
2.2 Provide three (3) reasons for near miss incident reporting.
2.3 Illustrate the four (4) goals of a near miss investigation.
Activity 5.1
Sea Logistics
Safety reporting form
Event and location
Date and time
Nature of event Incident Accident Near miss
Cause
Injuries
Name of injured person/persons
Medical care required
Description of the event
Witnesses
Corrective measures to address
immediate hazards related to incident
(** This serves merely as an example – Students can use their own discretion and
design, if all the elements are included).
Activity 5.2
1. Near miss incident.
2. Causes of the incident
• Pulling on the pipe, resulting in crushing the power cable.
• Damage to the insulation of the power cable, causing the armour and
Y phase to make contact.
3. Lessons learned/recommendations
• Inspection of the site to determine underlying hazards, such as the
power cable.
• The power supply should be switched off with an erection of a pipe
near power cables.
• A single line diagram on the power distribution board panel must be
installed to reduce the time duration to switch off the power supply in
case of an emergency.
• More vigilant supervision when this task is performed in future.
• Inspection of the site before task commences.
• Installation of earth leakage protection for all power supply feeders.
4. Safety incident report
Sea Logistics
Safety reporting form
Event and location Construction site
Date and time 13 August 2020
Nature of event Incident Accident Near miss
Cause • Pulling on the pipe, resulting in
crushing the power cable.
• Damage to the insulation of the power
cable, causing the armour and Y
phase to make contact.
Injuries No human injury
Name of injured person/persons Not applicable (N.A)
Medical care required N.A.
Description of the event A pipe was removed by a crane from a
main pipe rack. Employees pulled on the
pipe. The pipe touched a power cable
mounted to a beam. The pulling caused
the cable isolation to damage. The
Armour and Y phase made contact
leading to a short. The cables were set
on fire. The electric power was switched
off by bystanders.
Witnesses Yes
Corrective measures to address See recommendations in number 3
immediate hazards related to incident above.
** This is merely an example. The student can use their own discretion to substantiate
the safety culture portrayed in the case study.
Activity 5.3
Summary of employee engagement according to content of video:
1.4 Report near miss incidents, address the incident and take action to prevent
reoccurrence.
Bianca, A. n.d. Safety reporting systems. Small business. Chron. Available from:
https://smallbusiness.chron.com/safety-reporting-systems-
16904.html#:~:text=Safety%20reporting%20systems%20are%20used,the%20industr
y%20and%20the%20organization [Accessed on 26 October 2020].
Bird Construction. 2016. Near miss reporting – safety awareness [video]. Available
from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrkEDpFJq2o [Accessed on 22 January
2021].
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS). 2020. Incident
investigation: OSH answers. Available from:
https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/hsprograms/investig.html [Accessed on 26
November 2020].
City of South Burlington, Vermont. 2019. Importance of reporting near misses. Video
(4:14). Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSqSINycaGs [Accessed
on 29 July 2021].
Douglas, E, Cromie, S, Leva, MC, Balfe, N. 2014. Modelling the reporting culture
within a modern organisation. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 36, 589-594. doi:
10.3303/CET1436099.
RLS Human Care. n.d. Sharing of near miss/ accident cases at construction sites
Case Study- 2. Available from: https://rlsdhamal.com/sharing-of-near-miss-accident-
cases-at-construction-sites-case-study-2/ [Accessed on 10 January 2021].
SMS Pro. n.d. Confidential safety reporting system. Available from: https://www.asms-
pro.com/WhatisSMSPro/ConfidentialSafetyReportingSystem.aspx [Accessed on 26
October 2020].
McKinnon, RC. 2020. The design, implementation and audit of occupational health
and safety management. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
Morrison, KW. 2014. Reporting near misses: Why are they important and how can
safety pros get employees involved? Available from:
https://www.safetyandhealthmagazine.com/articles/10994-reporting-near-misses
[Accessed on 04 January 2021].
O’Neill, S & Wolfe, K. 2017. Measuring and reporting on work health and safety.
Available from:
https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/system/files/documents/1802/measuring-and-
reporting-on-work-health-and-safety.pdf [Accessed on 25 November 2020].
Ramírez, E, Martin, A, Villán, Y, Lorente, M, Ojeda, J, Moro, M, Vara, C, Avenza, M,
Domingo, MJ, Alonso, P, Asensio, M, Blázquez, JA, Hernández, R, Frías, J & Frank,
A. 2018. Effectiveness and limitations of an incident-reporting system analyzed by
local clinical safety leaders in a tertiary hospital. Prospective evaluation through real-
time observations of patient safety incidents. Medicine, 97, e12509.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012509.
Learning outcomes
On completion of this learning unit and chapters 16, 61, 63 and 65 in the prescribed
textbook, you should be able to:
Key concepts
Job safety analysis
Risk assessment
Risk assessment process
Human factors
Job safety
Job design
Personal safeguarding
Electrical safeguarding
Mechanical safeguarding
Personal protective equipment (PPE)
6.1 Introduction
McKinnon (2020) explains that the key factors of a health and safety management
system is management leadership and involvement, as well as employee
engagement, where the latter “buys” into the health and safety of the organisation. To
guide the management of an organisation in controlling areas of potential loss and to
set standards, a safety management system (SMS) will prescribe elements, processes
and programmes that will assist in risk reduction and what should be done to establish
a sustainable basis to maintain workplace risk as low as reasonably practicable. The
focus of this learning unit is JSA as being part of the safety processes and safety
design in the workplace.
• Identify/choose the
1 specific job
• Determine control
4 measures
Step 1:
The Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS, 2016)
recommends that a JSA must be done for all jobs, which is most often seen by
organisations as time consuming. For the latter it is necessary to identify which jobs
need to be analysed. To identify or choose a specific job, the following can be
considered:
• Accident frequency and severity regarding the jobs within the organisation.
• Potential severity (injuries/illnesses) and consequences of accidents,
hazardous condition, exposure to harmful products.
• New established jobs as there will be a lack of experience in doing the job and
hazards related to the new job may not be evident or anticipated.
• Modified operations to existing jobs, where new hazards may be associated
with changes in the job procedures.
• Infrequently performed jobs where employees may be at greater risk due to
non-routine jobs.
Step 2
The identified/chosen job needs to be break down into steps. Each step must be in a
sequence and must be kept in their correct sequence. This part of the JSA is done by
observation of how the job tasks are executed, usually by the supervisor. It is important
that the job observer have experience and capability in all parts of the job tasks. When
the sequence of the breakdown of the steps are completed, each step should be
discussed by all the employees performing the job to ensure that all the basic steps
are recorded and in the correct order (sequence). All involved should also contribute
to potential hazard identification and the recommended prevention is taken to control
the risks. During this step an additional column can be added to determine the severity
level of the risk the identified hazards pose.
The following is an example of the format which can be used for step 2:
Step 3
Following the above example, Step 3, which is the identification of possible hazards
for each of the job steps, will be listed in the second column. During this step, it is also
important to get the insight from all the employees performing the job as they know
first-hand what the job entails.
Although the next column is not indicated as a step, it is necessary to determine the
level of the risks each hazard identified poses. Here the risk matrix can be used, which
will be explained later in learning unit.
Step 4
During this step, it must be determined the ways to eliminate or control the identified
hazards. The accepted measures in order of preference are:
i. Eliminate the hazard
ii. Contain the hazard
iii. Revise the work procedures
iv. Reduce the exposure
Step 5 and 6
These two steps focus on communicating and monitoring the findings of step 1 to 4.
6.2.3 The JSA worksheet
The following is a sample form for a JSA worksheet as provided by CCOHS (2016).
For example:
Work needs to be done on a fragile roof, where the latter can be described as a roof
sheeted with materials that will not safely support a person’s weight and can shatter
without warning.
Figure 6.3: Applying the five steps of the risk assessment process
Source: Thomas, 2020 – adapted and changed
Table 6.3: Example of a risk assessment form
Step Activity Hazard Associated Persons Risk Matrix Control
Involved Risk at Risk Likelihood Consequence Risk Measures
Value
1
2
3
4
5
Source: Author, 2021.
There is a possibility that the mechanic might sustain a serious eye injury.
Therefore: Likelihood x Severity = Risk level
2x2=4
The risk is medium; therefore, this hazard/risk needs control
measures.
There are different risk assessment keys and risk descriptors. An organisation will
choose their own to use that will suit the uniqueness of their organisation.
6.4 The difference between job safety analysis and risk assessment
Looking at what JSA and risk assessment are, both seem similar since both are tools
used in reducing risks and being proactive in health and safety. Both risk assessment
and JSA share some basic principles, but are not the same. Job safety analysis
involves only job-specific risks and risk assessment considers all the operational risks.
For further information go to the following website:
• Here’s the difference between JSA and risk assessment by Sitemate,
available at: https://sitemate.com/us/resources/articles/safety/difference-
between-jsa-risk-assessment/
To familiarise yourself with the link between JSA and human factors, go to:
Understanding human factors in occupational safety by EKU Online at:
https://safetymanagement.eku.edu/blog/understanding-human-factors-in-
occupational-safety/
The World Health Organisation (2016) defines human factors as a scientific discipline
concerned with the understanding of the interaction between humans (individuals with
each other), other elements of a system (equipment and facilities) and organisational
management systems. Human factors can be categorised as environmental,
organisational and job factors which are influence by human behaviour and can affect
the health and safety system of an organisation. No hazards or risks can be fully
eliminated, but various methods can be used to analyse and understand the
organisational or task related human factors to prevent or mitigate risk caused by
human error or behaviour. One of the methods being the risk management process,
other examples are safety culture evaluation, human error identification, task
analyses, to mention but a few.
The design of job tasks developed during recent years and is driven by technology,
requirements and skills of the individuals performing the job. Therefore, human factors
can be grouped into three aspects that are interlinked and overlapping each other.
These human factors are the organisation, the job/tasks and the individual (human).
Organisation Individual
•Management and •Individual
employees characteristics
•Safety culture •Behaviour and
•Management attitude
systems •Qualification and
skills
Job
•Tasks
•Workplace and
equipment design
•Environment
Considering job factors, it is important to include the way a job is designed to interact
with the individual, equipment, and the workplace. This interaction and design will have
a direct effect on the health and safety of the individual (employee). Important task
factors, such as length of shifts, frequency of breaks, task workload, physical and
mental demands of the job will influence the human performance and will affect the
individual and the effectivity of the work system, impacting consequently the health
and safety of the employees and the organisation’s health and safety system (All
Answers Ltd., 2018).
Discussion 6.1: Human error
Human error is a significant source of risk in any organisation and has consistently
been cited as a major causal factor in a high percentage of accidents and incidents.
There have been an increasing number of incidents at your workplace and
investigation shown that human error such as: active errors, slips and lapses, ruled
based mistakes and routine violations contributed to these incidents. Discuss these
variations of human error and what control can be applied to each type of error on the
discussion forum.
Job design, equipment, information and work environment, all play a vital role in the
variety of individual (human) capabilities, experience, qualification and limitations to
work effectively and ensure a healthy and safe work environment. The suggestion of
McKinnon (2020) by using an employee job specification to ensure that the correct
person is selected for the correct job, will specify the physical and cognitive aptitudes
and attitudes required for the job. McKinnon (2020) further suggests that an employee
specification should be used to reduce the chances of frustration, mismatching, stress,
and so on which can lead to human error impacting on the organisation’s health and
safety system. Vasile and Croitoru (2012) explain that employees with the appropriate
attitudes and awareness of the risks, as well as the appropriate training and personal
development will increase efficient and safe work procedures, which means reducing
risks. This can only be accomplished if the employees understand the design of the
work, equipment, work environment and the risks involved. A well-designed job should
permit an employee to feel competent and valued, maximise productivity, and provide
for a healthy and safe workplace.
A job design can directly influence the health and safety of the employee and the
workplace. With the design of a job, the general principles of prevention need to be
taken into account. The principles of prevention are a hierarchy of risk elimination and
reduction and can be presented as follows in a descending order of preference:
Avoid risks
The Oxford Online Dictionary define the term “safeguarding” as protection from harm
or damage with an appropriate measure. Personal safeguarding therefore means that
an organisation needs to take into account the views, wishes, feelings and beliefs of
their employees when decisions are made. Humans all have different preferences,
histories, circumstances and lifestyles and by making safeguarding personal aims to
develop an outcome that is acceptable for all employees. The JSA will include the
organisation’s standards and legislation when it comes to personal safeguarding. This
is also the reason why employees should have the opportunity to participate in the
safeguarding process and JSA without the fear of prosecution, victimisation,
discrimination and so on.
Safe Work Australia (2012) explains that electrical risks are risks of death, electric
shock or other injury caused directly or indirectly by electricity in a workplace. Methods
that can be used to ensure electrical safeguarding are: regular safety audits,
modification in safety practices when electrical safeguarding is compromised, the
correct use of electrical equipment, training and information on the use of electrical
equipment. All of the above-mentioned electrical safeguarding methods will be used
when a JSA is conducted. McKinnon (2020) explains that electrical safety is a wide
field and will differ from organisation to organisation, therefore a few basic guidelines
will be given in this learning unit. The Electrical Machinery Regulations (2011) governs
the design manufacturing, installation, selling, using employers and suppliers of
electrical machinery. The South African government also introduced the Certificate of
Compliance (CoC) in 1993 and the OHS Act, 85 of 1993, Regulation R. 242 of 2009,
SANS 10142-1 are included in the CoC requirements. McKinnon (2020) suggests that
an organisation can develop and implement an electrical safety programme to serve
as a guideline for how employees should work safely around electrical parts and
equipment. Such a programme should identify electrical hazards as well as job safe
practices for working on or near areas where electrical hazards and risks have been
identified. An electrical safety programme and the standards and legislation will serve
as a guideline in conducting a JSA.
Mechanical safeguarding relates to the safeguarding of machinery where employees
are exposed to using machines to perform their job tasks. Machinery can be defined
as an assembly of linked parts or components, where at least one part or component
moves, has control and energy circuits and so on. The Canadian Centre for
Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS) (2018) indicates that mechanical
safeguarding includes exposure to moving parts of machines, heat or cold, noise,
vibration, hydraulic system, psychosocial risks, including stress, job content, cognitive
factors and so on. The South African Standard on the Safety of machinery (SANS
12100:2013) governs the general principles for design of machinery. According to the
standard, risk reduction lies with the machine design firstly, where the lifespan of the
machine, the use of it, what and how it will be used are set out. It is also the
responsibility of the designer to compile a risk evaluation to determine the levels of
risk surrounding the machine (Eltze, 2015).
Table 6.6: General hazards, risks and injury associated with machinery and
equipment that might be identified in a JSA
Hazard Risk Injury
Rotating shafts, pullies, sprockets and Entanglement Bruising,
gears dislocation,
amputation
Hard surfaces moving together Crushing Laceration,
bruising,
suppression
Scissor/shear action Severing Cuts, laceration,
amputation
Sharp edge – moving/stationary Cutting/puncturing Puncture, cuts,
laceration,
amputation
Cable/hose connections Slips, trips and falls Electrical shock,
breaks, sprains,
dislocation
Source: Queensland Government, 2019
With a JSA the obvious hazards and risks are usually easy to identify, but working with
or around machinery and electrical equipment, non-mechanical hazards and risks,
such as human factors are also present. Non-mechanical hazards and risks also
include dust, mist (vapours/fumes), noise, heat, cold, molten materials, steam and so
on. Sometimes they were also caused by machinery and electrical equipment affecting
the work environment. Employees can be exposed to these hazards and risks for
many years which will cause serious injury if not adequately controlled.
Guards
• Fixed – barrier, permanent part of machine.
Devices
Safeguarding methods should always take the principles of safe design and the
hierarchy of control into account. Please study the examples of control methods as
provided by the Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (2021), available
at: https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/safety_haz/safeguarding/general.html.
1. Apply the risk management process to rank and prioritise the level of risk for each
identified hazard/risk.
2. With the treatment of the hazard/risk phase of the risk management process,
apply safeguarding.
3. Use the risk assessment key (table 6.4) and risk descriptor (table 6.5) for analysis
of the hazards/risks.
The hierarchy of controls starts with the controls perceived to be the most effective
(elimination) and moves down to the least effective (PPE) method of control. From
this, it is seen that PPE is the least effective method of control and should be
implemented as the last resort to protect employees from risks and hazards in the
workplace. Unfortunately, many organisations handle the hierarchy of control the other
way around, by providing PPE as the first step in protecting employees and controlling
hazards.
The OHS Act, 85 of 1993 states clearly that PPE is considered the last line of defence
against employee injury and illness and is acceptable when controls higher in the
hierarchy, such as engineering and administrative controls are not feasible. The
occupational health and safety regulations state that PPE must be worn by employees
to reduce exposure to hazards (NIOH, 2020). Legislation further states that it is the
responsibility of the employers to provide employees with suitable PPE and clothing,
free of cost.
PPE can be defined as clothing and equipment designed with the aim to protect
employees against different levels of hazards. The main objective thus is to reduce
exposure to hazards. It is vital for organisations to select the correct PPE for the correct
job. McKinnon (2020) suggests that employees should be included in selecting PPE
and management can consider forming a PPE committee. A PPE committee should
include employees of the purchasing department, production departments and
employees from other sectors of the organisation. This will ensure that the employees
have a say in the selection of PPE and it will ensure employee engagement in the
safety of the organisation and enhance the organisational safety culture (McKinnon,
2020). The selection of PPE also requires an investigation into safe work methods and
procedures, as well as risk assessment to determine the degree of PPE required and
the appropriateness of the PPE to suit the job to ensure the reduction of exposure of
hazards (NIOH, 2020). There are different types of PPE and the selection depends on
the type of hazards and risks.
Head protection
Eye protection
Ear protection
Respiratory
protection Face protection
Body protection
Hand protection
Foot protection
Head protection is designed to protect the employee against falling materials, swinging
objects and knocking against stationary objects. Head protection in the form of caps
or hair nets provide protection against entanglement or scalping on machinery.
Examples include helmets, hard hats and hair nets (Strålin, 2021).
The names “eye and face protection” say it all, these devices are designed to protect
the eyes and faces of workers against spills, splashes, “flying” objects and so on.
Examples include safety glasses and goggles, eye and face shields, eyewear
accessories and visors (Strålin, 2021).
Most of the common injuries in a workplace are to the hands, arms and fingers of
workers and hand protection will ensure that these areas are protected against heat,
cold, vibrations, burns, cuts, bacteriological risks and so on. Examples include work
gloves and gauntlets and wrist cuff arm nets (Strålin, 2021).
Foot protection is designed to protect the feet of workers against exposure to extreme
temperatures, crushing, piercing, slipping, cutting, electricity and so on. Examples
include safety boots, safety shoes and anti-static and conductive footwear.
Body protection is design in the form of clothing for protection against weather
conditions, high-visibility, extreme temperatures, entanglement, drowning, chemical
contamination and so on. Examples include life jackets, clothing for specific weather
conditions and harnesses. Harnesses are included in the body protection class and
specifically designed to protect employees when they are working at height and
access points. Examples of height and access protection include fall-arrest systems,
lowering harnesses, rescue lifting jackets and harnesses and energy absorbers.
The last type of PPE is respiratory protection which is specifically design to protect
employees against gases, powders, dust and vapours. Examples include breathing
apparatus, full face/half mask respirators, powered respirators, protective hoods,
disposable face masks, detectors and monitors. It is vital that employees are trained
in the correct use of the respiratory protection equipment to ensure effective protection
against hazards and risks that may cause respiratory illnesses (Strålin, 2021).
The OHS Act 85 of 1993 requires the employer to provide a healthy and safe work
environment. Although PPE is the last line of control, some jobs require the wear of
PPE. Where the job specification and legislation require PPE, it is the duty of the
employer to provide the correct PPE as well as training in the use of it. The employee
has the duty to wear the PPE correctly, maintain and store it properly. The information,
instruction and training will provide the employees how to maintain, clean and dispose
the PPE.
The PPE information and instruction will cover the following aspects:
6.9 Conclusion
The key factors of an organisation’s health and safety management system is
management leadership and involvement, as well as employee engagement. Through
these factors it is essential for an organisation to conduct proper JSA to determine and
measure the demands, complexity and responsibility, as well as the competencies of
the employees to carry out the jobs effectively and safely. A JSA is a procedure used
to integrate accepted safety and health principles and practices into a specific task or
job. It is a systematic procedure that breaks each job into sequences, identifying the
safety elements and to train employees how to avoid potential safety hazards. Also,
the JSA process is complex and involve risks which is best handled through risk
management.
Risk is all about uncertaity and risk assessment is about determining the potential
probability, frequency, and severity of loss which are caused by hazards, resulting in
risks. A risk assessment will analyse the level of risk associated with the identified
hazards, and will propose controls to reduce the level of risk. A risk assessment matrix
is used when a risk assessment is conducted and is a visual tool that represents the
potential risks and based on two intersecting factors, namely the likelihood and the
consequence (severity) of the risk involved.
Human factors, such as environmental, organisational and job factors influence human
behaviour and impact job safety. The human factors are interlinked and overlapping
each other. This interaction and design will have a direct effect on the health and safety
of the employees. Job design, equipment, information and work environment all play
a role in the individual capabilities, experience, qualification and limitations to work
effectively and ensure a health and save environment.
The hierarchy of controls include: (i) elimination; (ii) substitution; (iii) engineering
controls; (iv) administrative controls; and (v) PPE. The first step in conducting a job
evaluation is the identification and mitigation of the hazards and risks, where the
hierarchy of control will be used. It is important that PPE is always the last line of
control of hazards and risks unless the job evaluation indicates that the job needs to
be performed with PPE. The correct PPE for the correct job must be selected and the
employees need to be part of the selection process.
References
All Answers Ltd. 2018. Human failure in workplace health and safety incidents.
Available from: https://ukdiss.com/examples/workplace-health-human-
failure.php?vref=1 [Accessed on 1 March 2021].
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS). 2016. Job safety
analysis. Available from: https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/hsprograms/job-haz.html
[Accessed on 31 July 2021].
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS). 2018. Safeguarding
– working around machinery. Available from:
https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/safety_haz/safeguarding/machinery.html
[Accessed on 03 March 2021].
Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS). 2021. Safeguarding
– general. Available from:
https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/safety_haz/safeguarding/general.html [Accessed
on 03 March 2021].
Compliplus Limited. 2019. How human factors impact on health & safety. Available
from: https://compliplus.com/news/71-the-human-factor-impact-on-health-safety
[Accessed on: 22 February 2021].
Doig Corporation. 2016. Safety risk assessment video training (2:42). Available from:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVh2iOMUvik [Accessed on 01 August 2021].
ETQ. 2017. Step by step guide to job safety and job hazard analysis. Available from:
https://www.etq.com/blog/step-by-step-guide-to-job-safety-and-job-hazard-analysis/
[Accessed on 04 August 2021].
Health and Safety Authority. n.d. Designing for safety. Available from:
https://www.hsa.ie/eng/Your_Industry/Construction/Designing_for_Safety/ [Accessed
on 03 March 2021].
Healthy Working Lives. 2020. Personal protective equipment (PPE). Available from:
https://www.healthyworkinglives.scot/workplace-guidance/safety/personal-protective-
equipment/Pages/training-of-ppe.aspx [Accessed on 08 March 2021].
Kloosterman, V. 2019. What are the 5 risk management steps in a sound risk
management process? Available from:
https://continuingprofessionaldevelopment.org/risk-management-steps-in-risk-
management-process/ [Accessed on 26 January 2021].
Lellis, C. 2021. The difference between job safety analysis and risk assessment.
Available from: http://www.perillon.com/blog/difference-between-job-safety-analysis-
and-risk-assessment [Accessed on 31 July 2021].
McKinnon, R.C. 2020. The design, implementation and audit of occupational health
and safety management. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
Risk Central. 2015. Job safety analysis – Training (2008) (28:38). Available at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWgfcXc9ap8&t=13s [Accessed on 01 August
2021].
Safe Work Australia. 2012. Managing electrical risks in the workplace. Code of
practice. Available from:
https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/system/files/documents/1705/mcop-managing-
electrical-risks_in_the_workplace-v1.pdf [Accessed on 03 March 2021].
Sitemate. 2019. Here’s the difference between JSA and risk assessment. Available
from: https://sitemate.com/us/resources/articles/safety/difference-between-jsa-risk-
assessment/ [Accessed on 02 August 2021].
Smith, E, Koop, A & King, S. 2011. Guidance on human factors critical task analysis.
IChemE, Symposium Series No. 156. Available from:
https://www.icheme.org/media/9267/xxii-paper-54.pdf [Accessed on 07 August
2021].
Thomas, C. 2020. Five steps of the risk management process. Available from:
Available from: https://www.360factors.com/blog/five-steps-of-risk-management-
process/ [Accessed on 22 January 2021].
Vasile, E & Croitoru, I. 2012. Integrated risk management system – Key factor of the
management system of the organization. Chapters, in: Nerija Banaitiene (ed.), Risk
Management - Current Issues and Challenges. doi:10.5772/47883
Wolters Kluwer, 2018. How to calculate your business risk using a risk assessment
matrix. Available from: https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en-gb/expert-insights/how-to-
calculate-your-business-risk-using-a-risk-assessment-matrix [Accessed on 07
August 2021].
WORKSMART. n.d. What are the five steps to risk assessment? Available from:
https://worksmart.org.uk/health-advice/health-and-safety/hazards-and-risks/what-
are-five-steps-risk-assessment [Accessed on 06 August 2021].
Your ACSA Safety. 2014. Job hazard analysis (JHA) (4:43). Available from:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XpNhrMrggE [Accessed on 01 August 2021].
Answers to activities
Discussion 6.1
Activity 6.1
Risk assessment process
Identified Analyse risks Evaluate/rank Treat the Monitor and
risks risks risks review risks
Small pieces L (2) x C (2) = 4 Medium risk PPE – Safety
of material Risk score = score warrant glasses
and polish medium treatment Restraints – to
can “fly” press object
towards the gently against
operator polishing mop.
The objects L (2) x C (2) = 4 Medium risk PPE – Safety
that need to Risk score = score warrant glasses
be polished medium treatment Restraints – to
can “fly” out of press object Supervise the
the operator’s gently against treatment
hands correct part of implemented
the polishing in the previous
mop. step by
Lose clothing L (1) x C (2) = 2 Low risk score PPE – monitoring,
(jacket, shirt, Risk score = does not Apron/overall and review
tie, etc), long Low warrant treatment to
hair, jewellery treatment Tie hair back determine
could be or use hair net effectiveness
caught in the This is an
rotating part No jewellery ongoing
of the permitted process
machine
(rotating
mop).
Any incident L (1) x C (2) = 2 Low risk score
Follow correct
that may need Risk score = does not work
to stop the Low warrant procedure and
machine treatment train
quickly employee in
operation of
the machine
(** This serves merely as an example – students can use their own discretion and
design).
Activity 6.2 Personal Protective Equipment
1. Ultraviolet radiation
Metal fumes/gases
Burns
Eye damage
Electric shock Any 5
Cuts
Injury to toes and fingers
Noise
Work environment (confined space)
Tripping and falling
5. Reference list
Burton, L. 2017. Refusal to wear PPE: guidance for employers. Available from:
https://www.highspeedtraining.co.uk/hub/refusal-to-wear-ppe/ [Accessed on: 08
March 2021].
Petkovsek, J. n.d. Five potential welding safety hazards to avoid. Available from:
https://www.lincolnelectric.com/en-za/support/welding-solutions/Pages/Five-
potential-welding-safety-hazards.aspx [Accessed on: 08 March 2021].
Salton, J. 2017. Can you “force” a worker to wear PPE? Available from:
https://healthandsafetyhandbook.com.au/bulletin/can-you-force-a-worker-to-wear-
ppe/ [Accessed on: 08 March 2021].
XYZ