Is More Always Better
Is More Always Better
Is More Always Better
Better?
The New Biology of Aging
and the Meaning of Life
by DAVID GEMS
The social consequences of extending the human life span might be quite bad; perhaps the worst
outcome is that power could be concentrated into ever fewer hands, as those who wield it gave way
more slowly to death and disease. But the worry that more life would damage individuals’ quality of life is
not persuasive. Depending on what the science of aging makes possible, and on how people plan their lives,
He had passed that great meridian, the age of forty, nematode life were translated into human terms, this
when for every man the process of spiritual evolution would represent a lifespan of around 700 years.
stops, and he goes on thenceforward working out to the Common sense tells us that aging is universal, in-
end a character that has become fixed and evitable, and associated with gradual physical decline.
unalterable.”—G. Baker, in Tiberius Caesar But in this case, common sense is wrong. Some ani-
mal species, such as tiny betentacled hydra, do not ap-
T
he American biologist Andrzej Bartke recent- pear to age at all. 3 There exist, for example, individual
ly showed that a combination of genetic alter- colonies of corals that are over 20,000 years old.4
ation and nutritional restriction can increase What is more, within the last decade biologists have
the lifespan of a laboratory mouse by around 70 per- found that the rate of aging is remarkably easy to alter
cent.1 While control mice withered and died, the test in laboratory animals such as nematodes, fruit flies,
animals were still zestfully scurrying about, fleet of and mice. It is no longer far-fetched to think that one
foot with glossy fur and unclouded eyes, and appar- day it will be possible to retard the aging process in
ently as full of joie de vivre as any young rodent. Dis- humans and extend the human life span.
coveries of this sort are now far from rare. I recently Do we really want this research to succeed? Some
found that alteration of a gene called daf-2 can in- bioethicists have professed horror at the thought of
crease the maximum life span of male nematode dramatic life extension. Many recoil at the notion of
worms from 31 to 199 days—a 6.4-fold increase. 2 If a extending the lives of people undergoing irreversible
physical decline, like the senile and decrepit Struld-
bruggs in Gulliver’s Travels. Yet recent research shows
David Gems, “Is More Life Always Better? The New Biology of Aging
and the Meaning of Life,” Hastings Center Report 33, no. 4 (2003): 31- it may be possible not just to extend life, but to ex-
39. tend youth. What if each of us could live a longer life,
32 H A S T I N G S C E N T E R R E P O R T July-August 2003
genome has been sequenced, and a promising and exciting areas of work funded research is successful.
high proportion of C. elegans genes in biology, yet biologists are strangely BBSRC-funded work has involved
have equivalents in humans. Thus, if reluctant to advocate the extension of treatments that dramatically increase
the genes controlling aging in C. ele- human life, or sometimes even to lifespan in nematodes, fruitflies, ro-
gans are found, they could potentially admit that life extension may be a dents, and yeast. Yet it is easy to un-
be used to identify genes controlling consequence of their work. Consider derstand how we have arrived at this
human aging. the following justifications for aging peculiar attitude of denial. Treating
In classical genetics, the art is to research grant applications in the the aging process would have two
identify genes that control the forma- United Kingdom: major consequences. First, it would
tion of any particular facet of biology dramatically reduce the incidence of
“Unless we can identify ways
by looking for instances where a sin- many of the principal killer diseases
through which healthspan can be
gle gene has malfunctioned (mutat- of the developed world, such as car-
increased as we age, the strain on
ed), producing a defective animal. diovascular disease, cancer, diabetes,
healthcare costs owing to the vol-
The geneticist then works back to Alzheimer’s disease, and Parkinson’s
ume of age-related pathologies will
infer the normal function of the gene. disease. This is because what really
be enormous.”
For example, to understand how puts us at risk of these ailments is get-
genes specify the fur color of mice, ting old. It has been said of cancer:
“The results of the study will guide
one might study albinos. Similarly, to “advancing age is the most potent of
our future ideas about the nature
understand how genes are related to all carcinogens.” 12 This being so, why
of the ageing process. This knowl-
aging, one would look for mutants invest all the effort into investigating
edge provides an important base-
where the normal aging process was these diseases piecemeal, if there is a
line from which more applied
interrupted, resulting in an increase chance that by finding a treatment for
studies to design ageing interven-
in lifespan. Surprisingly, nobody aging one could get the lot in one
tions can be launched.”
thought to take the classical genetic swoop?13 As an argument to convince
approach to aging until the 1980s. a grant assessment committee to sup-
“We believe that our findings will
But in 1989, Thomas Johnson at the port a proposed programme of re-
eventually have an impact on
University of Colorado made a re- search into aging, this is pretty un-
human health and quality of life.”
markable discovery. He showed that a beatable.
mutation in a single gene, which he “Healthspan,” “human health,” But lurking in the shadow of this
named age-1, increased average life “quality of life”—but not longevity. first consequence of treating aging is
span in C. elegans by 65 percent.9 Some researchers of aging even ex- the second: enhanced longevity. And
Since that time, geneticists have dis- plicitly deny that their work is aimed here some brows start to furrow. Un-
covered many life span genes, not at extending life. Publicity material derstandably, biogerontologists prefer
only in worms, but also, more recent- from the recent U.K. Biotechnology to be associated with medical research
ly, in fruitflies10 and mice.11 and Biological Sciences Research rather than with a field whose history
Evolutionary theory shows us that Council (BBSRC) Experimental Re- involved goat testicles and yoghurt
it is wrong to think of aging as an in- search on Ageing initiative reads as diets. Yet it is probably also true that
evitable consequence of the inherent follows: biologists, like many others, are un-
limits to the durability of biological settled by the possible consequences
Experimental Research on Ageing
systems. Rather, the reasons for the of increased longevity.
(ERA) is a new programme being
occurrence of aging are starkly banal:
launched to fund a broad range of
it is merely a by-product of the Worrying about Living Longer
science projects on the biology of
process of evolution. It is about as im-
normal ageing. The aim of ERA is
portant in terms of adaptation and
evolutionary fitness as nipples on
men. Life span potential and the rate
to understand the basic biology of
healthy ageing. It is hoped that
S urely the possibility of longer life
is something wonderful. Yet not
only bioethicists are sighing and
such information could eventually
of aging are genetically controlled grinding their teeth: within popular
lead to new treatments that could
traits, like height, sex, or eye color. debate about the possibility of life ex-
reduce age related decline and thus
The secrets of aging and how to block tension there are a number of recur-
increase ‘healthspan’ and improve
it lie in the genes. The new genetics of rent worries. Uppermost is the possi-
quality of life for the elderly. ERA
aging is starting to reveal these secrets. bility of huge overpopulation. This
is not aimed at lengthening lifes-
could indeed be a consequence—but
pan.”
Why Biologists Are Cagey not necessarily. In much of the devel-
The last remark is particularly star- oped world birth rates continue a
34 H A S T I N G S C E N T E R R E P O R T July-August 2003
life in the one who experiences it. Man sets himself goals, and while many are highly repeatable—though
Would life inevitably become bor- he is heading towards them he is the capacity of desires to be revived
ing—even to the point that it would buoyed up by hope, indeed, but and rekindled varies with the type of
not be worth living? This is the meat gnawed at the same time by the experience concerned. Some take a
of this discussion. There are two fac- pain of unsatisfied desire. Once long time before their repetition does
tors that will affect how much we the goal is reached, however, after not involve a diminution of quality.
ought to want life extension and that the first flush of triumph has And some can never be repeated–—
have not previously been considered. passed away, there follows in- particularly where the experience in-
One is the progressive psychological evitably a mood of desolation. A volves a discovery; to be rediscovered,
changes that occur during normal void remains, which can seeming- a thing must first be forgotten, and
aging, the other the character of the ly find an end only through the some things are hard to forget.
life plan or life narrative in whose painful emergence of new long- Nicholas Saunders has spoken of
context much of what we do has ings, the setting of new goals. So parachute jumping as an example of
meaning. the game begins anew, and exis- an unrepeatable experience: no jump
tence seems doomed to be a rest- can ever be quite as vivid as the first.21
Pessimism and the less swinging to and fro between Some people seem especially able
Repeatability of to enjoy endless repetition
Experience of the same experience, a
36 H A S T I N G S C E N T E R R E P O R T July-August 2003
means to select at will the stage at ance of being somewhere between minent death. According to Grof
which one wanted to live. Such a ca- twenty and forty years old through- and Halifax, this has less to do with
pacity would also affect the length of out their adult life. They would then fear of imminent nonexistence, or
life that, given the choice, one die suddenly, typically in their even the horror of dying, than with
would select. For surely the process eighth or ninth decade. Further- the difficulty of accepting that plans
of becoming progressively set in more, death would be painless, not for the future will not be fulfilled. A
one’s ways with increasing age helps involving illness or disease—a sud- focus of Grof’s psychotherapy
to make more bearable the diminu- den loss of consciousness, preceded (which included the use of the psy-
tion of one’s life expectancy with in- optionally for a few days or weeks by chedelic drug LSD) was to help the
creasing age, since it makes it less some form of painless, unambigu- patients to radically alter and curtail
likely that one’s identity will alter ous indicator of impending death to their conceptions and expectations
and give rise to new ambitions and allow time for goodbyes. Such non- of their future lives. A measure of
desires. It has often been argued that aging mortals might fear death, but the efficacy of such treatments was,
a blessing of the aging process is that they would have no cause to fear the according to Grof and Halifax, that
it encourages us to weary of life, process of dying, any more than patients often required less pain
thereby drawing the sting from they should fear falling asleep. Such medication.
death. Yet if it were possible, when a life would represent the perfect Arguably, the most transforma-
experiencing the ennui of a very fulfilment of the current stated aims tive element of effective anti-aging
long life, to revert to the biological of biogerontological research pro- treatments would be to bring about
mental age of a seventeen-year-old, grams such as BBSRC ERA. an expansion of one’s future. Expec-
with the relative plasticity of identi- Such evergreen mortals might tation of a future of a given, approx-
ty that would result, one could then elect to undergo a life-extending imate length provides the founda-
undergo a renewed adult ontogeny, treatment either because they want a tion for our future plans and expec-
bringing with it new desires, tastes longer life, or because they are afraid tation of the trajectory of our lives.
and ambitions, and a renewed desire of death. Arguably, considered apart This sense of future is one of the
to live. In such a future, young and from the questions of one’s reasons mainstays of the framework of
old minds would live side by side— for wanting to live, for the evergreen meaning in which many of our ac-
as now—yet either could be chrono- mortals the actual process of dying is tions make sense. To use the current
logically ancient. This would be something of a non-event. As for argot, “Human actions are embed-
akin to replacing the cycle of life and death itself . . . as the Epicurian ded within the narrative of a human
death of a perennial flower with the adage rightly has it: when death is life, and human lives are embedded
cycle of renewal of a deciduous tree. there, we are not, and when we are in larger social narratives.”31 From
But to return to biologists’ cagi- there, death is not—really, we this it follows that the value of an
ness about life extension: the occur- should not fear it.29 extension of future will be influ-
rence of patterned psychological So our evergreen individual has enced by the sort of life narrative or
changes with increasing age raises se- rationalized away his fear of death. It life plan a person has.
rious questions about the quality of would not surprise us to learn that Where do life narratives come
extended lives. Clearly, at least, we he still chose to extend his life. Sev- from, and do they exhibit general
may not assume that life extension eral factors might influence how features or fall into distinguishable
of the magnitude of that achieved in much such an evergreen individual types? Presumably, like other facets
nematodes and rodents would be, would want such a treatment, and of human culture, individual life
like good health, simply more of the how much of such a treatment he plans draw on a common cultural
same. would want. stock of life narrative elements that
In The Human Encounter with have evolved over the millennia of
Life Plans and Expectation of Death, Stanislav Grof and Joan Hal- human cultural history. This being
Future ifax describe the difficulties that ter- so, one would expect that many
minally ill cancer patients experi- such components will have evolved
38 H A S T I N G S C E N T E R R E P O R T July-August 2003
5. There are a number of good, popular don: Royal College of Physicians of Lon- 26. G.E. Robinson, “Regulation of Divi-
accounts of the biology of aging, for exam- don, 1998), 113-38. sion of Labor in Insect Societies,” Annual
ple Why We Age, by S.N. Austad (New York: 16. P.D. Kramer, Listening to Prozac Review of Entomology 37 (1992): 637-65.
John Wiley and Sons, 1997), The Time of (London: Penguin Books, 1993). 27. This similarity has been discussed by
Our Lives, by T. Kirkwood (London: Wei- 17. E. Parens, “Is Better Always Good? Matt Ridley in The Origins of Virtue (Lon-
denfeld and Nicholson, 1999), and Aging: The Enhancement Project,” in Enhancing don: Penguin Books, 1996), Chapter 1.
A Natural History, by R.E. Ricklefs and Human Traits: Ethical and Social Implica- 28. The psychologist H.J. Eysenck has
C.E. Finch (New York: Scientific American tions, ed. E. Parens (Washington D.C.: suggested that age changes in behavior re-
Library, 1995). Georgetown University Press, 1998), 1-28. flect altered levels of excitation within the
6. Z.A. Medvedev, “An Attempt at a Ra- 18. L. Hayflick, “The Future of Ageing,” central nervous system. See “Personality
tional Classification of Theories of Ageing,” Nature 408 (2001): 267-69. and Ageing: An Exploratory Analysis,”
Biological Reviews 65 (1990): 375-98. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality 3
19. K. Capek, “The Makropoulos Se-
7. For an entertaining account of early cret” (1922), in Toward the Radical Center: (1987): 11-21.
theories of aging, see Roger Gosden’s Cheat- A Karel Capek Reader (Highland Park, N.J.: 29. The question of whether death is an
ing Time, Science, Sex and Aging (New York: Catbird Press, 1990), 110-77. For further evil is discussed thoroughly in Williams,
W.H. Freeman and Company, 1996.) discussion of this play, see Bernard Problems of the Self, and Thomas Nagel’s
8. G.C. Williams, “Pleiotropy, Natural Williams’ essay “The Makropoulos Case: essay “Death,” in Mortal Questions (Cam-
Selection and the Revolution of Senes- Reflections on the Tedium of Immortality,” bridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979),
cence,” Evolution 11 (1957): 398-411. in Problems of the Self (Cambridge: Cam- 1-10.
9. D.B. Friedman and T.E. Johnson, “A bridge University Press, 1973), 82-100. For 30. S. Grof and J. Halifax, The Human
Mutation in the Age-1 Aene in Caenorhab- a review of the many other fictional ac- Encounter with Death (London: Souvenir
ditis elegans Lengthens Life and Reduces counts of immortality, see G. Slusser, G. Press, 1977).
Hermaphrodite Fertility,” Genetics 118 Westfahl, and E.S. Rabkin, eds., Immortal 31. C. Elliott, A Philosophical Disease
(1988): 75-86. Engines: Life Extension and Immortality in (New York: Routledge, 1999), Chapter 7.
10. Y.-J. Lin, L. Seroude, and S. Benzer, Science Fiction and Fantasy (Athens Geor- The role of narrative in making sense of our
“Extended Life-Span and Stress Resistance gia: University of Georgia Press, 1996). lives is discussed extensively in A. MacIn-
in the Drosophila Mutant methuselah,” Sci- 20. M. Schlick, “On the Meaning of tyre, After Virtue (Notre Dame, Ind.: Uni-
ence 282 (1998): 943-46. Life,” in Life and Meaning, ed. O. Hanfling versity of Notre Dame Press, 1981); and M.
11. H.M. Brown-Borg et al., “Dwarf (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987), 60-73. Schechtman, The Constitution of Selves
Mice and the Ageing Process,” Nature 384 21. N. Saunders, Ecstasy Reconsidered (N. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996).
(1996): 33. Saunders, 1997). 32. A number of other important issues
12. R.A. DePinho, “The Age of Cancer,” 22. L. Kass, “L’Chaim and Its Limits: relating to the ethics of life extension have
Nature 408 (2000): 248-54. Why Not Immortality?” First Things 113 been discussed elsewhere. See Kass,
13. R. Holliday, “The Urgency of Re- (2001): 17-24. “L’Chaim and Its Limits,” Hayflick, “The
search on Ageing,” BioEssays 18 (1996): 89- 23. G.P. Baker, Tiberius Caesar (New Future of Ageing,” J. Harris, “Intimations
90. York: Cooper Square Press, 1929). of Immortality,” Science 288 (2000): 59; M.
Gladwell, “The New Age of Man,” The
14. “Why Italians Don’t Make Babies,” 24. R.M. Sapolsky, “Open Season: Why New Yorker, 30 September 1996, 56-67;
The Economist 9 May 1998, 56. Do We Lose Our Taste for the New?” The T.F. Murphy, “A Cure for Aging?” Journal of
15. J.G. Evans, “A Correct Compassion: New Yorker 30 March 1998, 57-72. Medicine and Philosophy 11 (1986): 237-55;
The Medical Response to an Ageing Soci- 25. This subject is reviewed in I. Stuart- R.M. Veatch, ed., Life Span: Values and Life-
ety,” in Increasing Longevity: Medical, Social Hamilton, The Psychology of Ageing (Lon- extending Technologies (New York: Harper
and Political Implications, ed. R. Tallis (Lon- don: Kingsley, 1994), Chapter 5, “Ageing, and Row, 1979).
Personality and Lifestyle,” 110-31.