The Weak Interaction: Project PHYSNET Physics Bldg. Michigan State University East Lansing, MI
The Weak Interaction: Project PHYSNET Physics Bldg. Michigan State University East Lansing, MI
The Weak Interaction: Project PHYSNET Physics Bldg. Michigan State University East Lansing, MI
1. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2. Assigned Readings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3. Characteristics of the Weak Interaction a. The Weak Force: Universal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 b. Huge Fluxes For Direct Neutrino Observation . . . . . . . . . . . 1 c. Change in S if One Weak Vertex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 d. Range of the Weak Interaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 e. A Four-Fermion Interaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 4. Categories of Weak Interaction a. Categories Based on Particles Involved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 b. Examples of Weak Leptonic Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 c. Examples of Weak Semi-Leptonic Processes . . . . . . . . . . . 2 d. Examples of Weak Hadronic Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 e. Strong Decays Occur Before Weak Decays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5. The Intermediate Vector Boson a. The W Particle as the Weak-Force Meson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 b. The Mass of the W Particle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 c. The Spin of the W Particle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 d. The Neutral Weak Boson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 e. A Problem with Neutral K Decay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 Acknowledgments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
L0
ene
- s
d d
u d
L0 S
_ p
pn
e_ ne
ID Sheet: MISN-0-281 THIS IS A DEVELOPMENTAL-STAGE PUBLICATION OF PROJECT PHYSNET The goal of our project is to assist a network of educators and scientists in transferring physics from one person to another. We support manuscript processing and distribution, along with communication and information systems. We also work with employers to identify basic scientic skills as well as physics topics that are needed in science and technology. A number of our publications are aimed at assisting users in acquiring such skills. Our publications are designed: (i) to be updated quickly in response to eld tests and new scientic developments; (ii) to be used in both classroom and professional settings; (iii) to show the prerequisite dependencies existing among the various chunks of physics knowledge and skill, as a guide both to mental organization and to use of the materials; and (iv) to be adapted quickly to specic user needs ranging from single-skill instruction to complete custom textbooks. New authors, reviewers and eld testers are welcome. PROJECT STAFF Andrew Schnepp Eugene Kales Peter Signell Webmaster Graphics Project Director
Title: The Weak Interaction Author: J. R. Christman, Dept. of Physical Science, U.S. Coast Guard Academy, New London, CT Version: 11/8/2001 Length: 2 hr; 16 pages Input Skills: 1. Interpret Particle Diagrams and give the associated coupling constants (MISN-0-279). Output Skills (Knowledge): K1. List the three categories of weak interactions and give examples and possible Particle Diagrams for each. K2. Give arguments that lead to predictions of the mass and spin of the W particles. Output Skills (Problem Solving): S1. Given a weak decay, devise a plausible Particle Diagram for it, showing the weak interaction as a four-fermion interaction. S2. Given a weak decay, devise a plausible Particle Diagram for it, showing the weak interaction as the exchange of a (charged) W or a (neutral) Z0 . External Resources (Required): 1. M. J. Longo, Fundamentals of Elementary Particle Physics, Prentice-Hall (1973). 2. Scientic American, March, 1959. Post-Options: 1. SU(3) and the Quark Model (MISN-0-282). 2. Current Work in Elementary Particles (MISN-0-284). Evaluation: Stage B1
ADVISORY COMMITTEE D. Alan Bromley E. Leonard Jossem A. A. Strassenburg Yale University The Ohio State University S. U. N. Y., Stony Brook
Views expressed in a module are those of the module author(s) and are not necessarily those of other project participants. c 2001, Peter Signell for Project PHYSNET, Physics-Astronomy Bldg., Mich. State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824; (517) 355-3784. For our liberal use policies see: http://www.physnet.org/home/modules/license.html.
MISN-0-281
MISN-0-281
The participation of a neutrino guarantees that the interaction is weak. However, it is extremely dicult, in most cases, to show that a neutrino is, in fact, even present. 3c. Change in S if One Weak Vertex. All rst order weak interactions (i.e., decays with one weak vertex), either do not change strangeness or else change strangeness by 1. That is, S = 0, 1 for rst order weak decays. Second order weak interactions, decays with two weak vertices, are extremely rare and will not be considered here. 3d. Range of the Weak Interaction. Theories suggest that the range of the weak interaction is on the order of 1016 1017 m, which is shorter than the range of the strong interaction. 3e. A Four-Fermion Interaction. A weak interaction vertex in a Particle Diagram must have exactly four particle lines and the particles must all be fermions. The interaction strength at the vertex is denoted gw .
2. Assigned Readings
Chapter 6, Longo S. B.,Treiman, The Weak Interactions, Scientic American, March, 1959.
MISN-0-281 n p + e + e (nuclear
3 decay):
MISN-0-281 K+ + + + + :
ne n gw ep
+ 0 +e+ +e :
_ L0 K
+
gs p gw n p gs gs
p+
gs p
pp+
p+ gs p
n p gs
gw
0 p + :
p L0 p pn gs
ne
gw
p0
4e. Strong Decays Occur Before Weak Decays. The hadrons that enter the weak vertex of the above diagrams are the lowest mass baryons with S = 0 and S = 1. All hadrons couple strongly to at least one of these baryons, and since the strong interaction is so fast one expects an initial hadron to rst interact strongly until one of these low mass baryons is produced.
+e +e :
gs pgs n p gw
L0
ene
4d. Examples of Weak Hadronic Processes. diagrams for Weak Hadronic Processes: K+ + + 0 :
_ L0 K
+
n gw n p gs
gs
p0
gs p
p+
MISN-0-281
MISN-0-281
eZ0
e-
ne
e-
ne p n _ g w W_ g w
ne
ene
gw to make the overall
5b. The Mass of the W Particle. Since the range of the weak interaction is less than 1016 m, the mass of the W must be greater than an amount determined by the uncertainty principle: h c (1.05 10 34) (3 108 ) h = = = 3.151010 J = 2.0 GeV . mc > t R 1016
2
5d. The Neutral Weak Boson. A neutral boson is not needed for exchange in the usual weak couplings of nuclear physics; all of them involve a transfer of charge and so involve the exchange of charged Ws. However, the observed weak scattering of one lepton by another does require the exchange of a neutral boson (see Fig. 2.). Our current theoretical understanding is that the W0 cannot itself be observed, but that it and another unobservable particle combine two dierent ways to form the observed weak-interaction Z0 and the well-observed electromagnetic-interaction (the photon). Apart from lepton scattering, other reactions such as + p + p + 0 can occur via the exchange of the Z0 . 5e. A Problem with Neutral K Decay. An important example of weak neutral exchange should be the decay of the neutral kaon. The more usual decay products include at least one pion. The decay to leptons, K 0 + + , is extremely rare. With a Z0 existing, K0 can decay that way via a rst order weak decay and for some time the rarity of that decay mode was taken as evidence that the neutral weakon did not exist. With evidence for the Z0 in neutrino scattering (see Sect. 5d), a new explanation was required for the rarity of the neutral kaon decay to muons. The solution is another quantum number, called charm, which we shall discuss elsewhere.1
(Note: 1 GeV = 103 MeV.) Experimentally, W particles have been seen. The observed mass of the W is approximately 80 GeV. 5c. The Spin of the W Particle. The spin of the W can be deduced from observations of the spins of its decay products. Consider, for example, the decay of the neutron (see the diagram in Sect. 5a and Fig. 1, this section). In the center of mass frame of the electron and antineutrino, the spin of the antineutrino is /2 in the direction of its momentum (this is h true for the antineutrino in any frame) and the spin of the electron is observed to be /2 in the direction opposite to its momentum. The orbital h angular momentum is zero. If the particles result from the decay of a W, the spins and momenta of the decay products look as in Fig. 1. Note that the total spin is , to the left. Since angular momentum is conserved, the h spin of the W must have been . This is in fact the reason for its name h intermediate vector boson. An integer spin particle is a boson and a spin 1 particle has associated with it a vector eld (another vector boson, the photon, is associated with the vector electromagnetic eld). It is also easy to deduce that the W particles have electron family number 0, muon
9
Acknowledgments
Preparation of this module was supported by the United States Coast Guard Academy for a Directed Studies Program. Preparation of this
1 See
10
MISN-0-281
MISN-0-281
PS-1
module was supported in part by the National Science Foundation, Division of Science Education Development and Research, through Grant #SED 74-20088 to Michigan State University.
PROBLEM SUPPLEMENT
Note: If you do not understand how an answer in this supplement was arrived at, kindly go back to the text and work through it carefully. Make sure you understand all of the text examples before coming back to this supplement. The text is organized for learning, whereas this supplement is designed to help you test whether you learned the subject from the text.
Problems: Devise plausible diagrams for the following weak decays, both without and with intermediate weakons. 1. 0 0 + 0 (C) 2. K+ 0 + e+ + e (B) 3. + + + (E) 4. 0 p + e + e (A) 5. 0 + e + e (D) Note: In some cases there are a number of legitimate possibilities for intermediate states. For example, in Answer (C) the (p, p) intermediate state could equally well be (n, n). Answers: (A)
p L0 gw ene L0 _ g w W-
p e_ g w ne
11
12
MISN-0-281 (B)
PS-2
gw SK
+
e+ ne SK p0
+
_ g w W n n gs
+
_ g w
e+ ne
gs n gs
(C)
gs
p0 L0
p gs ne eL0 p0
(D)
(E)
p p+ gs n gw
m+ nm
p p+ gs n W+ _ _ g w g w
m+ nm
13
14
15
16