Lab Notes
Lab Notes
Lab Notes
Figure 6. Unnatural veins in manufactured gold-in-quartz. Left: This vein is filled with both polymer, which is not
flush with the host quartz, and gold (field of view 4.79 mm). Center: A vein of polymer running alongside a vein of
gold with undercutting visible at the boundary of the polymer vein and the host quartz (field of view 3.57 mm).
Right: Polymer fills an incomplete gold vein; the rest of the vein is recessed below the host quartz (field of view
7.19 mm).
pearl revealed concentric growth arcs sions (figure 10). There were several ticles and more loosely spaced unal-
proving its natural origin. However, glassy melt inclusions and small crys- tered exsolved rutile needles was also
the RTX results of the larger blister tals with associated reflective thin present, a feature that would be very
pearl revealed a void-like structure films. The thin films often displayed unusual in Thai/Cambodian rubies. A
that may be found within natural and hexagonal geometric patterns con- large intact colorless crystal as well as
non-bead-cultured pearls, but a near- forming to the crystallographic orien- smaller white crystals were located
oval feature inside the void is uncom- tation of the host ruby. These deep within the stone, so we were un-
mon in natural pearls (figure 9). GIA resembled the patterns commonly able to conclusively identify them
gemologists believe this oval feature seen in rubies from Thailand and with Raman spectroscopy. This inclu-
was the triggering mechanism that Cambodia and have also been docu- sion scene is consistent with un-
likely resulted in the formation of the mented in Montana corundum (Fall heated corundum from Montana.
blister pearl. Whether this oval fea- 2015 G&G Micro-World, pp. 329– LA-ICP-MS was used to determine
ture is a by-product of pearl culturing 330). A partial hexagonal zone of par- the stone’s trace-element chemistry,
or a natural formation is hard to prove
without examining the blister pearl
thoroughly in other orientations,
which was precluded by its size and Figure 11. The 1.70 ct Montana ruby alongside rough pink to purple corun-
position. While the identification of dum samples from the GIA reference collection. These reference samples,
some freshwater pearls remains chal- collected from Montana’s Eldorado Bar along the Missouri River and
lenging, these known freshwater sam- Wildcat Gulch, part of the Rock Creek deposit, were used to help deter-
ples together with their host shells mine the country of origin.
serve as useful references for labora-
tory gemologists.
Joyce Wing Yan Ho
Large Pargasite Inclusion in Figure 13. A large prismatic pargasite mineral inclusion. Field of view
7.19 mm.
Kashmir SAPPHIRE
Kashmir sapphires are known to have
occurred in kaolinized plagioclase
feldspar pegmatites, found as pockets
between metamorphic stratified
beds/cliffs of the Himalayan Zanskar
Range. These sapphires captured
many cognate mineral inclusions—
such as pargasite, plagioclase feldspar,
tourmaline, and zircon—which de-
marcate the pockets against the coun-
try rock (E.J. Gübelin and J.I. Koivula,
Photoatlas of Inclusions in Gem-
stones, Vol. 3, Opinio Publishers,
Basel, Switzerland, 2008, p. 194).
Pargasite mineral inclusions (pris-
matic or as long, fine needles) in blue
sapphire are regarded as a strong indi-
cator of Kashmir origin. (R. Schwieger,
“Diagnostic features and heat treat-
Figure 15. This group of 300 green-blue diamonds (1.97 carats total) was screened by GIA’s Tokyo laboratory.
Among these, 299 were irradiated natural melee diamonds and the one on the right was an irradiated CVD syn-
thetic melee diamond.
GR1
INTENSITY
SiV
596/597
WAVELENGTH (nm)
Figure 16. DiamondView imaging Figure 17. The photoluminescence spectrum of the green-blue CVD syn-
revealing weak linear striations thetic melee diamond at liquid nitrogen temperature shows a strong GR1
in the pavilion of the irradiated peak. The SiV – center defect can be observed at around 736 nm. The dou-
CVD synthetic melee diamond. blet at 596/597 nm indicates that this diamond did not undergo anneal-
ing after synthesis.
GR1 by irradiation treatment. Infrared 240–241; Fall 2015 Lab Notes, pp. 320– the table facet (figure 18, center). As a
absorption spectroscopy, photolumi- 321; Summer 2018 Lab Notes, pp. 215– result of the Lightbox mark, the clar-
nescence spectroscopy, and Diamond- 216). Previously reported irradiated ity grade for both was reduced to VS.
View analysis confirmed that 299 of CVD synthetic diamonds were rela- The laser-inscribed internal feature is
them were irradiated natural dia- tively large, from 0.43 to 1.34 ct. This reportedly made using technology de-
monds and one of them was an irradi- is the first melee-sized irradiated CVD veloped by Opsydia (Gem and Jew-
ated CVD synthetic diamond. The synthetic diamond examined by GIA. ellery Export Promotion Council, “De
CVD synthetic diamond weighed Shoko Odake Beers to use Opsydia’s laser tech to in-
0.007 ct, with a diameter of 1.14 mm. scribe lab-grown diamonds in Light-
DiamondView images of the syn- box Jewelry,” https://www.gjepc.org/
thetic showed very weak linear stria- Gemological Analysis of Lightbox news_detail.php?id=4075). It is com-
tions in the pavilion (figure 16). Dark CVD-Grown “White” Diamonds posed of dual narrow lines ~2.5 mi-
inclusions were observed under the Lightbox, a De Beers company, has crons wide with a total area of 300 ×
microscope. The infrared spectrum begun selling “white,” pink, and blue 300 microns, positioned about 200 mi-
showed a peak at 3123 cm–1, and the CVD laboratory-grown diamonds at a crons below the table surface.
photoluminescence spectrum showed flat rate of $800 per carat. Through a Spectroscopic analysis showed
doublet peaks at 596/597 nm (figure third-party vendor, we recently had both samples had very similar fea-
17). These peaks are seen in CVD the opportunity to examine two such tures that were consistent with
synthetic diamonds without post-an- samples (0.24 and 0.26 ct) intended for previously analyzed CVD products
nealing. The photoluminescence setting in a pair of earrings. Both were from other manufacturers. IR absorp-
spectrum also showed a small, broad near-colorless with color grades equiv- tion spectroscopy confirmed these
SiV– center defect at 737 nm next to a alent to G color and cut grades of Ex- samples as type IIa with no detectible
very strong GR1 center at 741 nm (fig- cellent and Very Good, respectively. single nitrogen at 1344 cm–1. Photo-
ure 17). From the peak at 3123 cm–1 Both lab-grown diamonds had very luminescence (PL) spectra showed
and the 596/597 nm doublet peak, few clarity characteristics. The 0.24 ct that both had the 596/597 nm doublet,
this diamond was concluded to be ir- sample had a pinpoint in a bezel facet, indicating that they were as-grown
radiated without pre-annealing. and the 0.26 ct round (figure 18, left) and not subjected to post-growth
Irradiated CVD synthetic dia- had a feather in a star facet, both with HPHT processing (S. Eaton-Magaña
monds are rarely seen at GIA, which VVS clarity. However, the grade-set- and J.E. Shigley, “Observations on
had examined only six of them before ting feature for both was the Lightbox CVD-grown synthetic diamonds: A
this report (Fall 2014 Lab Notes, pp. logo, internally inscribed underneath review,” Fall 2016 G&G, pp. 222–
245). Faceted, as-grown near-colorless treated after growth (S. Eaton-Mag- emission from nitrogen-vacancy cen-
CVD samples are less common since aña, “Summary of CVD lab-grown di- ters by PL spectroscopy (figure 19), as
most manufacturers grow CVD lay- amonds seen at the GIA laboratory,” well as visible red fluorescence using
ers quickly, but with a brown color, Fall 2018 G&G, pp. 269–270). DiamondView imaging (figure 18,
knowing that they can be HPHT Through crossed polarizers, we ob- right), but there was no detectable flu-
treated to improve color appearance served very low birefringence com- orescence with long-wave UV. With
after growth. Approximately 75% of pared with the majority of CVD-grown careful DiamondView imaging, subtle
the CVD material in this color range diamonds examined. Additionally, CVD striations were visible through
examined by GIA has been HPHT both samples showed very strong the table facet. In the DiamondView
images, there were no apparent growth
interfaces showing multiple growth
events, and no apparent seed crystal
Figure 19. This 514 nm PL spectrum collected on the 0.26 ct sample at
remnants were observed. Also, PL
liquid nitrogen temperature shows strong nitrogen vacancy centers at 575
spectroscopy of both samples showed
and 637 nm and the 596/597 nm doublet, evidence of an as-grown CVD
very weak but detectable silicon-va-
sample.
cancy centers at 736.6/736.9 nm.
The Lightbox CVD lab-grown dia-
PL SPECTRUM monds, due to their price point and
manufacturer, will likely be highly vis-
NV0, 575
NV–, 637 ible in the trade. The pink and blue
samples, as evidenced by De Beers’ lit-
100000 erature, have an appearance that is un-
596/597 nm doublet
usual among natural-color diamonds
INTENSITY (COUNTS)
80000
and are unlikely to ever be perceived
as a natural-color product. However,
the colorless Lightbox samples are
60000 readily identifiable as CVD-grown di-
amonds by spectroscopic techniques,
40000
592 594 596 598 600 602 604 DiamondView imaging, and their dis-
Raman
tinctive internal inscription.
0
550 600 650 700 750 800 Cat’s-Eye Brazilian Paraíba
WAVELENGTH (nm) TOURMALINE
A vivid shade of tourmaline varying
For online access to all issues of GEMS & GEMOLOGY from 1934 to the present, visit:
gia.edu/gems-gemology
[!]· .