BC Sewar Lab Report
BC Sewar Lab Report
BC Sewar Lab Report
Al Najdawi
MYP Year (3) A
Date: 1 / 22 /
2023
Criterion B: 8/8
Science Department
Unit 1: Does Matter, Matter? Criterion C: 8/8
Summative Assessment Criteria B&C
Investigating Rate of Reaction
Instructions to candidate:
13 2
I. state a problem or question to be tested by a I. state a problem or question to be tested by a scientific investigation, with
scientific investigation, with limited success limited success when you try to give a prediction of an outcome for the
II. state a testable hypothesis experiment and suggest reasons to be tested.
III. state the variables II. state a testable hypothesis when you try to explain how metals react with
IV. design a method, with limited success. acids.
III. state the variables when you try to fill the table of controlled variables, how
and why it is controlled.
IV. design a method, with limited success when you try to describe why you
choose the material for your experiment.
3-4 The student is able to: You were able to:
I. state a problem or question to be tested by a I. state a problem or question to be tested by a scientific investigation when
scientific investigation you give a prediction of an outcome for the experiment and suggest reasons
II. outline a testable hypothesis using scientific to be tested.
reasoning II. outline a testable hypothesis using scientific reasoning when you explain
III. outline how to manipulate the variables, and how metals react with acids
state how relevant data will be collected III. outline how to manipulate the variables, and state how relevant data will
IV. design a safe method in which he or she be collected when you fill the table of controlled variables, how and why it
selects materials and equipment. is controlled.
IV. design a safe method in which you select materials and equipment when
you describe why you choose the material for your experiment.
5-6 The student is able to: You were able to:
I. outline a problem or question to be tested by I. outline a problem or question to be tested by a scientific investigation when
a scientific investigation you give a prediction of an outcome for the experiment and suggest reasons
II. outline and explain a testable hypothesis to be tested.
using scientific reasoning II. outline and explain a testable hypothesis using scientific reasoning when
III. outline how to manipulate the variables, and you explain how metals react with acids.
outline how sufficient, relevant data will be III. outline how to manipulate the variables, and outline how sufficient,
collected relevant data will be collected when you fill the table of controlled
IV. design a complete and safe method in which variables, how and why it is controlled.
he or she selects appropriate materials and IV. design a complete and safe method in which you select appropriate
equipment. materials and equipment when you describe why you choose the material
for your experiment.
The student is able to: You were able to:
I. describe a problem or question to be tested I. describe a problem or question to be tested by a scientific investigation
by a scientific investigation when you give a prediction of an outcome for the experiment and suggest
II. outline and explain a testable hypothesis reasons to be tested.
using correct scientific reasoning II. outline and explain a testable hypothesis using correct scientific reasoning
III. describe how to manipulate the variables, and when you explain how metals react with acids.
describe how sufficient, relevant data will be III. describe how to manipulate the variables, and describe how sufficient,
collected relevant data will be collected when you fill the table of controlled
IV. design a logical, complete and safe method in variables, how and why it is controlled.
which he or she selects appropriate materials IV. design a logical, complete and safe method in which you select appropriate
7-8 and equipment. materials and equipment when you describe why you choose the material
for your experiment.
I. collect and present data in numerical I. collect and present data in numerical and/or visual forms when you present the
and/or visual forms data that was collected in the lab.
II. accurately interpret data I. accurately interpret data when you try to answer “how do different metals react
III. state the validity of a hypothesis with with hydrochloric acid?”
limited reference to a scientific II. state the validity of a hypothesis with limited reference to a scientific investigation
investigation when you try to discuss the reactivity of different metals with hydrochloric acid.
IV. state the validity of the method with III. state the validity of the method with limited reference to a scientific investigation
limited reference to a scientific when you try to discuss the steps that secured your results.
investigation IV. state limited improvements or extensions to the method when you try to suggest
V. state limited improvements or extensions improvement to the method used.
to the method.
3-4 The student is able to: You were able to:
I. correctly collect and present data in II. correctly collect and present data in numerical and/or visual forms when you
numerical and/or visual forms present the data that was collected in the lab
II. accurately interpret data and describe III. accurately interpret data and describe results when you answer “how do different
results metals react with hydrochloric acid?”
III. state the validity of a hypothesis based on IV. state the validity of a hypothesis based on the outcome of a scientific investigation
the outcome of a scientific investigation when you discuss how different metals react with hydrochloric acid.
IV. state the validity of the method based on V. state the validity of the method based on the outcome of a scientific investigation
the outcome of a scientific investigation when you discuss the steps that secured your results.
V. state improvements or extensions to the VI. state improvements or extensions to the method that would benefit the scientific
method that would benefit the scientific investigation when you suggest improvement to the method used.
investigation.
5-6 The student is able to: You were able to:
I. correctly collect, organize and present I. correctly collect, organize and present data in numerical and/or visual forms when
data in numerical and/or visual forms you present the data that was collected in the lab.
II. accurately interpret data and describe VII. accurately interpret data and describe results using scientific reasoning when you
results using scientific reasoning answer “how do different metals react with hydrochloric acid?”
III. outline the validity of a hypothesis based VIII. outline the validity of a hypothesis based on the outcome of a scientific
on the outcome of a scientific investigation when you discuss how different metals react with hydrochloric acid.
investigation II. outline the validity of the method based on the outcome of a scientific
IV. outline the validity of the method based investigation when you discuss the steps that secured your results.
on the outcome of a scientific III. outline improvements or extensions to the method that would benefit the
investigation scientific investigation when you suggest improvement to the method used.
V. outline improvements or extensions to
the method that would benefit the
scientific investigation.
The student is able to: You were able to:
I. correctly collect, organize, transform and I. correctly collect, organize, transform and present data in numerical and/ or visual
present data in numerical and/ or visual forms when you present the data that was collected in the lab.
forms II. accurately interpret data and describe results using correct scientific reasoning
II. accurately interpret data and describe when you answer “how do different metals react with hydrochloric acid?”
results using correct scientific reasoning III. discuss the validity of a hypothesis based on the outcome of a scientific
III. discuss the validity of a hypothesis based investigation when you discuss how different metals react with hydrochloric acid.
on the outcome of a scientific IV. discuss the validity of the method based on the outcome of a scientific
investigation investigation when you discuss the steps that secured your results.
IV. discuss the validity of the method based V. describe improvements or extensions to the method that would benefit the
7-8 on the outcome of a scientific scientific investigation when you suggest improvement to the method used.
investigation
V. describe improvements or extensions to
the method that would benefit the
scientific investigation.
Introduction
When acids react with carbonates, such as calcium carbonate (found in chalk, limestone and marble), a
salt, water and carbon dioxide are produced.
The carbon dioxide causes bubbling during the reaction, which is observed as fizzing. It can be detected by
passing the gas through limewater, which will go cloudy.
Also, the reaction of metal carbonates with acids is exothermic (ie heat energy is given out/produced).
The speed of a reaction-usually called the rate of reaction-tells us how rapidly the products are formed from the
reactants. Rate of reaction is calculated by dividing change in the amount of reactant or product by time.
Task:
To investigate the effect of changing the mass (g) of calcium carbonate (CaCO 3) (0.5g, 1g, 1.5g) on the average rate
of reaction cm3/sec when calcium carbonate reacts with 15 ml (ml is cm cubed they are the same) 0.5M of
hydrochloric acid (HCl) at 24°C. The rate of reaction will be measured by recording the volume (cm 3) of CO2
released from the reaction every 5 seconds (for 60 seconds total) using a digital stopwatch (±0.01s) and a gas
syringe (±0.5 cm3) setup.
carbonate
Research question:
Your research question should be phrased “What is the effect of ___ on___”?
Should include the following:
1-3 to 5 Independent variables with unit
2-Dependent variable
3- State the Method of measurement of the dependent variable
Research question:
What is the effect of varying the mass of CaCO3 (in increments changing 0.5g from
masses ranging from 0.5g to 1.5g) on the rate of reaction with 15 ml of 0.5M HCl at
24°C, as measured by the volume of CO2 produced in cm^3 every 5 seconds for 1
minute using a digital stopwatch, and released into a gas syringe, while controlling the
controlled variables?
Thoroughly explains the prediction using relevant, detailed, credible scientific content (with footnote citations in MLA format)
Hypothesis:
Properly stated “If (Independent variable with increments and unit) then (Dependent variable with
Measurement tool / observation and unit) because: (simple) Scientific Explanation that supports the hypothesis. (This must
be based on research).
Your research must include theoretical data provided by real scientists’ experiments.
This part of the lab report will require you to write a bibliography and do in-text citation.
Hypothesis:
If the mass of CaCO3 is increased (in increments of 0.5g) when reacting with 15 cm3 of 1M HCl at 24°C, then the rate
of reaction, measured by the volume of CO2 produced every 5 seconds for 1 minute using a digital stopwatch and gas
syringe, will increase. This is because an increase in the mass of CaCO3 will result in a higher concentration of
reactants, leading to more frequent collisions between particles, increasing the rate of reaction.
Aim/Scientific background:
British International Academy 2023-2024 Page 5
Includes relevant background information that:
What Will Be Observed When Calcium Carbonate Reacts With Dilute Hydrochloric
Acid? www.quora.com/What-will-be-observed-when-calcium-carbonate-reacts-with-dilute-
Biii- Describe how to manipulate the variables, and describe how data will be collected.
(Describe: Give a detailed account or picture of a situation, event, pattern or process)
All variables are specific, relevant to the investigation.
Independent variable:
We are changing the mass of the calcium carbonate, in the first experiment which is 0.5 grams of CaCO3
and in the second experiment the mass is 1 gram, and in the third experiment it is going to be 1.5 grams, so
in each experiment we are adding 0.5 grams and begging with 0.5 grams. We are going to measure the
mass using A digital balance and we are putting the CaCO3 in the weighing boat, but we have to remove the
weight of the weighing boat and then precisely measure the mass of the reactant for this experiment.
Dependent variable:
We are measuring the volume of carbon dioxide gas produced in the experiment every 5 seconds for 1 minute so we
can measure the rate of reaction for the experiment with different masses of calcium carbonate. We are measuring
the volume of CO2 gas produced using a gas syringe setup (CO2 is measured by cm cubed).
Controlled variables, how to manipulate them and why do they need to be kept constant?
Controlled variables:
“What you keep constant”: all possible variables that would affect the data collected must be controlled
And reported in the table of controlled variables (there is no minimum or maximum number of controlled variables).
- Clearly stated with specific values &units (1st column)
- How it was controlled (2nd column)
- Instruments used to control and measure these variables
- Explain how and why you need to control each variable you included in the controlled variables list (3rd column)
- You have to formulate a table to explain how and why you need to control each variable you included in the controlled
variables list.
Concentration of HCL Acid (15 By using graduated cylinder The concentration of the hydrochloric
cm^3 0.5M of HCL) and measure using it 15 cm3 of acid affects the reaction rate. Keeping
1M HCL. Use a standardized 1M it constant ensures consistent
HCl solution. conditions for all trials. The increase of
the concentration of the acid gives
more particles of the acid itself which
makes the other reactant react more
vigorously with a higher concentration
of the hydrochloric acid.
Type of solution (acid) Use hydrochloric acid (HCl) Different acids may have varying
throughout the experiments reactivity. Using the same type of acid
only. ensures a consistent reaction medium.
And some acids at the same
concentration can still be stronger or
weaker than other types of acids.
Volume of HCL (15 cm^3) Use a fixed volume of 15 cm³ of Changes in the volume of the reactants
1M HCl for each trial by using a can impact the rate of reaction.
20 cm^3 measuring cylinder Keeping it constant ensures uniform
(±0.5 cm³) conditions. We need to keep the
volume of the HCL constant because
when we increase the volume of the
HCL then their would be more particles
for the calcium carbonate to react with,
thus increasing the volume increases
the rate of reaction, and vice versa, and
this helps keep the experiment
balanced and constant with only 1
independent variable.
Method of Measurement Use a digital stopwatch (±0.01 The method of measuring the volume
min.) and a gas syringe (100 of CO2 should be consistent to have
cm³). reliable data. The setup used to
measure the carbon dioxide gas
produced should be constant and
Surface Area of the calcium Use the same type and size of The surface area of the reactant
carbonate. calcium carbonate (CaCO3) (CaCO3) can affect the rate of reaction.
particles for each trial, in our Using the same type and size of calcium
case it will a very huge surface carbonate particles for each trial
area since it is a powder. ensures that variations in surface area
does not affect the results. The surface
area effects the rate of reaction, when
there is more surface area of the
reactant used the rate of reaction will
increase because the reaction will
happen very fat, but when there is very
little surface area the rate of reaction
will decrease, so keeping the surface
area constant is very crucial because it
will effect our aim in this experiment.
Biv-Design a logical, complete and safe method in which he/she selects appropriate materials and
equipment.
Method
1-Materials/Equipment:
Digital Stopwatch 1
Thermometer 1
Digital balance 1
Graduated cylinder 3
Weighing Boat 5
Conical Flask 3
Spatula 5
Stand 1
Clasp 1
Dropper 1
Rubber tube 1
Stop Watch 1
2-Procedure/ method:
Procedure:
1- Weight the mass of powder calcium carbonate using the digital balance (we measure 0.5 g, 1 g, and
1.5 gram)
2- Measure 15 ml of 0.5 hydrochloric acid using a graduated cylinder.
3- Place the powder calcium chloride measured in the conical flask.
4- Add the hydrochloric acid to the conical flask and seal it directly with the rubber stopper.
5- Record the volume of carbon dioxide gas produced every 5 seconds for 60 seconds by marking using
an erasable marker on the syringe for each 5 seconds until 1 minute.
6- Repeat twice for each mass of calcium carbonate.
all increments. In addition to a step that ensures that data are recorded in tables.
3-Safety/ Method:
This ensures that the method is safe and doesn’t cause harm to any human or any animal:
1-Part of it is general as it has to do with instructions of safety related to work in the lab, such as wearing lab coat, gloves and
goggles. This is part of all methods regardless of how simple or complex the procedure is.
2-The other part has to do with specific considerations related to each investigations, like the use of
Sharp objects, heat, delicate tools, in this case specific considerations must be mentioned before or after the method.
Safety considerations:
- Wear a lab coat, gloves, and goggles throughout the experiment to protect against HCL
splashes and spills.
- Caution with HCL: Handle hydrochloric acid (HCL) with care. It is corrosive, and direct contact
can cause skin and eye irritation. In case of accidental contact, rinse the affected area with
copious amounts of water and seek medical attention if irritation persists.
- Gas Syringe Handling: Exercise care when handling the gas syringe. Avoid sudden movements
that could lead to breakage.
- First Aid Kit: Seek immediate medical attention for any injuries, no matter how minor they
may seem.
- Always consult with laboratory supervisors and follow safety guidelines.
- Handle the glass equipments in the lab carefully since they might break or shatter when hit or
when they fall.
- Always take a small safety distance away from the experiment until you put the stopper, then
you can come close as much as you can. And when we use
- This method of doing the experiment won't hurt any human or animal if it was disposed in a
correct and
British International environmentally
Academy 2023-2024 friendly way. As for humans it won't affect them if they do13not
Page
get burned or irritated the human skin.
Criterion C: Processing and Evaluating
After the experiment is conducted, data must be collected, processed, evaluated and discussed. An
evaluation of the hypothesis and the method should be made and improvements and extensions must
be discussed.
Ci- correctly collect, organize, transform and present data in numerical and/ or visual forms.
(Organize: Put ideas and information into a proper or systematic order.) (Present: Offer for display, observation, examination or
consideration.)
Data collection and processing
Data collection: (write the table’s title& find out the average)
Table 1: volume cm3 of CO2 gas produced from the reaction of 0.5 g of CaCO3 with a 15 cm3 of 1M of
HCL acid at 24 °C for 1 min (60sec.) measured each 5 (sec.) intervals
Table 3: volume cm3 of CO2 gas produced from the reaction of 1.5 g of CaCO3 with a 15 cm3 of 1M of HCL
acid at 24 °C for 1 min (60sec.) measured each 5 (sec.) intervals
For 0.5g CaCO3 we observed some light fizzing. The reaction was completed after 10 seconds. When the fizzing
stopped, the volume of CO2 did not increase anymore. There were bubbles foaming in the fizzing, and that indicates
a gas being formed which is CO2.
For 1g CaCO3 we observed some fizzing not vigorous, not light it was normal. The reaction ended in almost 7 to 8
seconds so between 0.5 and 1.5. When the fizzing ended the volume of CO2 gas became constant and the reaction
ended.
For 1.5 CaCO3 we observed vigorous fizzing. The reaction was completed after 5 seconds. When the fizzing stopped,
the volume of CO2 did not increase anymore.
Before the reaction, the hydrochloric acid was clear. After adding the CaCO3, the solution turned cloudy. And the hcl
became a bit white because of the formation of new products like water, a salt, and gas which is carbon dioxide
which causes the hcl solution to turn cloudy. The carbon dioxide causes bubbling during the reaction, which is
observed as fizzing. It can be detected by passing the gas through limewater, which will go cloudy.
(Draw: Represent by means of a labelled (includes unites, accurate diagram or graph, using a pencil. A ruler (straight edge)
should be used for straight lines. Diagrams should be drawn to scale. Graphs should have points correctly plotted (if appropriate)
and joined in a straight line or smooth curve)
Graph:
Graph:
Data interpretation:
Write a conclusion that is clear and precise.
State whether the results support or do not support your hypothesis.
Discuss the following points:
1- Processed data table:
All results must be included in the discussion and compared to one another (Value increased/ decreased from-to) and
explained using a scientific explanation similar to the one included in the hypothesis.
2- The graph:
-Use scientific descriptors “strong/weak relationship” to describe the relationship between the IV and the DV.
From the data, it's evident that there is a positive correlation between the mass of CaCO3 and the concentration of
CO2 changes over the time intervals during the reaction with 1M HCl at 24°C. The concentration of CO2 generally
increases as the mass of CaCO3 increases, supporting the hypothesis that a higher mass of CaCO3 would result in a
higher rate of reaction, where the investigation aimed to explore the impact of varying CaCO3 mass (0.5g, 1g, 1.5g) on
the rate of reaction when reacting with 15 cm3 of 1M HCl at 24°C, measured by the volume of CO2 every 5 seconds for
1 minute using a gas syringe and digital stopwatch. The graph reveals a clear pattern: as the mass of CaCO3 increases,
the volume of CO2 evolved consistently rises over the 60-second observation period. This aligns with the hypothesis,
suggesting a positive correlation between CaCO3 mass and the rate of reaction. For instance, when the CaCO3 mass is
1g, the CO2 volume starts at 0 cm3 and gradually increases to 69.46 cm3 at 60 seconds.
Examining the graph, it confirms a strong positive correlation and relationship between the independent variable
(CaCO3 mass) and the dependent variable (CO2 volume). The trend line exhibits a steady increase, indicating a direct
relationship between the mass of CaCO3 and the rate of reaction. The gradient of the line signifies the rate of change,
showcasing a consistent increasing trend. This aligns with the collision theory, as a greater mass of CaCO3 results in
more particles available for reaction, leading to a higher concentration of reactants and increased collision frequency.
In the graph, it is evident that as the mass of CaCO3 increases, there is a consistent and proportional increase in the
volume of CO2 released at each time interval. This supports the hypothesis that a greater mass of CaCO3 leads to a
higher rate of reaction, aligning with the principles of collision theory and increased concentration of reactants. For
example, at 60 seconds, the volume of CO2 evolved rises from 69.5 cm3 for 0.5g of CaCO3 to 99.8 cm3
In conclusion, the processed data and graph strongly support the hypothesis that an increase in CaCO3 mass correlates
with a higher rate of reaction with 1M HCl. The positive correlation observed in the graph aligns with the theoretical
expectations, providing robust evidence for the relationship between CaCO3 mass and the rate of reaction in the
specified experimental conditions.
Validity is “the degree to which they accomplish the purpose”-Worthen (1993), discuss the following points:
2) The use of one independent variable and one dependent variable
3) Whether the method managed to keep the controlled variables constant
4) Results are quantitative
5) Identify any limitations or weaknesses in the procedure
The hypothesis suggests that an increase in the mass of CaCO3 when reacting with 1M HCl at 24°C will result in
an increased rate of reaction. This is based on collision theory and the concept of lattice energy. As the mass of
CaCO3 increases, more particles become available for reaction, thereby increasing the concentration of
reactants. The choice of 1M HCl as the acid further contributes to the hypothesis's validity. Strong acids release
a large concentration of hydrogen ions (H+) upon full ionization, increasing the likelihood of successful collisions
between H+ ions and carbonate ions in CaCO3. The data presented supports the hypothesis, with a clear trend
observed: as the mass of CaCO3 increases, there is a corresponding increase in the volume of CO2 changes, and
this also increases the rate of reaction of the reaction. This graph and data supports the hypothesis that an
increase in the mass of CaCO3 leads to a higher rate of reaction with 1M HCl at 24°C.
Civ- Discuss the validity of the method based on the outcome of a scientific investigation. (Discuss: Offer a
considered and balanced review that includes a range of arguments, factors or hypotheses. Opinions or conclusions should be
presented clearly and supported by evidence)
The method described for investigating the effect of varying CaCO3 mass on the rate of reaction with 1M HCl is a
good example for learning about the reaction of metal carbonate with acid. However, the validity of the method is
controlling the control of certain variables and potential sources of errors. Firstly, the precision of the
measurements is crucial; the use of a digital stopwatch with an accuracy of ±0.01 min and a gas syringe with an
accuracy of ±0.01 cm3 provides a reasonable level of precision. Nevertheless, human reaction time may introduce
errors in recording the volume of CO2 released, particularly during rapid reaction rates. Additionally, the
assumption that the reaction reaches completion within the observed 1-minute timeframe may lead to
underestimation of the total gas produced, as some reactions may continue beyond this period. Furthermore, the
method assumes constant temperature (24°C) throughout the experiment, but environmental factors or
equipment limitations may contribute to fluctuations. It's essential to acknowledge these potential sources of error
and consider how they might impact the reliability and accuracy of the results. Despite these considerations, the
method's overall design seems capable of providing valuable insights into the relationship between CaCO3 mass
and the rate of reaction with HCl.
As for the sources of errors, many errors occurred during the interval of 5 different trials, where in the first trial of
1.5 grams the reaction occurred very slowly and the data was inaccurate because the syringe was always stuck and
sometimes we forgot to blow out all of the gas in the tube leading to the string leading to many sources of errors,
other than that did not keep on mixing the reactants together to increase the reaction and get more accurate
results from he reaction, but still we got inaccurate information like in trial 2 for 1.5 g of CaCO3, the first 5 seconds
it only produced 15 cm cubed of carbon dioxide, and in 10 seconds it produced 17.5 cm cubed of carbon dioxide,
and finally after 15 seconds it stayed constant which was 19 cm cubed of carbon dioxide.
British International Academy 2023-2024 Page 18
So as for the trials we did for the lad the method was inaccurate and incorrect because of Mainz sources of errors,
but as for the information from the graph provided from the teacher, the answers and results were accurate and
Cv- Describe improvements to the method that would benefit the scientific investigation.
(Describe: Give a detailed account or picture of a situation, event, pattern or process.)
Improvements:
Observation and Recording: Record the reaction's qualitative data (such as, changes in temperature, and volume of
salt or water production) and other quantitative measurements. Detailed observations may provide a
comprehensive understanding of the reaction leading to a more accurate investigation.
We can also improve the report itself by changing the independent variable to become the concentration of the acid
to learn about how the factor concentration effects the rate of reaction, thus providing more evidence about what
we learned about the factors that effect the rate of reaction by implementing it in real life situations, by doing the
reaction in the lab.
We can improve the way we collect our data by using more accurate measuring tools and lab equipment and using
detailed and comprehensive equipments for reliable and accurate results for the reaction.
We can also improve the reaction and the validity of the hypothesis by adding more increments and more masses to
test, so we can add 2 g and 2.5 grams and another 5 trials for each mass other than the 0.5, 1, and 1.5g of calcium
carbonate. When we add more increments to validate our hypothesis, we make it more reliable and trustable
because we have more data to prove our hypothesis and our claim.
As for the number of the trials, we were planning on only doing 3 trials per mass, but we realized it should be more
accurate, so we added 5 total trials for each mass, then we calculated the average for more reliable and realistic
results and data.
The equipment we are using we are using are lab equipment and they are reliable because they are trustable and
accurate because they are designed for experiments just like the one we are going to make.