Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Feedbacksheet 2

    Uploaded by

    t9kcpvrm6c
    This document provides feedback on a postgraduate linguistics coursework assignment for a student. It includes the student's registration number, assignment details, the marker, and the mark awarded. It then evaluates the student's performance in five criteria on a scale of 1 to 9, indicating they performed well in knowledge, coverage and balance, and organization, and could improve in critical thinking and expression. The feedback notes the strengths of a clear structure and general summary, but suggests adding more critical engagement and clarity around which points are the student's own versus from the original paper. Overall it was a good attempt but more detail and critical analysis are needed.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Feedbacksheet 2

    Uploaded by

    t9kcpvrm6c
    6 views1 page
    This document provides feedback on a postgraduate linguistics coursework assignment for a student. It includes the student's registration number, assignment details, the marker, and the mark awarded. It then evaluates the student's performance in five criteria on a scale of 1 to 9, indicating they performed well in knowledge, coverage and balance, and organization, and could improve in critical thinking and expression. The feedback notes the strengths of a clear structure and general summary, but suggests adding more critical engagement and clarity around which points are the student's own versus from the original paper. Overall it was a good attempt but more detail and critical analysis are needed.

    Original Title

    feedbackSheet 2

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides feedback on a postgraduate linguistics coursework assignment for a student. It includes the student's registration number, assignment details, the marker, and the mark awarded. It then evaluates the student's performance in five criteria on a scale of 1 to 9, indicating they performed well in knowledge, coverage and balance, and organization, and could improve in critical thinking and expression. The feedback notes the strengths of a clear structure and general summary, but suggests adding more critical engagement and clarity around which points are the student's own versus from the original paper. Overall it was a good attempt but more detail and critical analysis are needed.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    6 views1 page

    Feedbacksheet 2

    Uploaded by

    t9kcpvrm6c
    This document provides feedback on a postgraduate linguistics coursework assignment for a student. It includes the student's registration number, assignment details, the marker, and the mark awarded. It then evaluates the student's performance in five criteria on a scale of 1 to 9, indicating they performed well in knowledge, coverage and balance, and organization, and could improve in critical thinking and expression. The feedback notes the strengths of a clear structure and general summary, but suggests adding more critical engagement and clarity around which points are the student's own versus from the original paper. Overall it was a good attempt but more detail and critical analysis are needed.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX

    DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS

    POSTGRADUATE LINGUISTICS COURSEWORK FEEDBACK

    Student’s Registration 2107696 Module Code: LG476


    Number:
    Assignment: Assessment 2 Weighting:
    40 % of the module
    Marker(s): Kyle Jerro Mark awarded:
    63 out of 100

    This assignment has been (please tick):

    X Single marked □ Single marked & □ Second marked □ Double marked


    (coursework up to and moderated (all fails and random (individual items of coursework of at least
    including 40%) (coursework up to and sample (10%) of any 30 credits (Independent Projects
    including 40% marked by coursework worth more /dissertations) and performance-based
    GTAs/new staff) than 40%) coursework/group work with a non-
    permanent output worth more than 40%)

    The following grades are intended merely to give you an approximate idea of the merits of different aspects
    of your work. They have not been ‘added together’ to establish your overall mark and will have different
    weighting for the overall assessment of your coursework

    Evaluation: 1-3 = Distinction/Excellent, 4 = Merit/Very good, 5 = Pass/Good, 6-9 = Fail/Inadequate

    1st 2.1 2.2 3rd Fail Fail Fail


    Marking criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    (90-100) (80-89) (70-79) (60-69) (50-59) (40-49) (30-39) (15-29) (0-14)
    (as outlined in your student handbook)

    Knowledge X

    Critical thinking X

    Coverage and balance X

    Expression X

    Organisation X

    Feedback
    Indicating your performance against the above marking criteria, strengths, weaknesses and opportunities for improvement

    Strengths:
    The paper gives a general summary of the paper, and the organizational structure is very clear.

    Weaknesses / areas for improvement:

    There isn’t much critical engagement with the ideas in the paper, and the writing sometimes doesn’t make it clear
    which points are from the paper and which are yours. I also think more detail would have been helpful in getting a
    sense of the contributions that LRH make.

    General comments:
    Overall, a good attempt, but more detail and more critical engagement would have helped bring clarity to the paper.

    ** If you wish to discuss your assignment feedback, please see your module director **

    You might also like