Crafts For Development

Heliyon 9 (2023) e13039
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Heliyon
journal homepage: www.cell.com/heliyon
Review article
Crafts as a key factor in local development: Bibliometric analysis

David Fernández Bellver a, M. Belén Prados-Peña b, *, Ana M. García-López c,
Valentín Molina-Moreno d
a
University of Granada; Department of Management-1, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Campus de Cartuja, s/n 18071,
Granada, Spain
b
University of Granada; Department of Marketing and Market Research; Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Campus de Cartuja, s/n
18071, Granada, Spain
c
University of Granada, Drawing Department, Faculty of Fine Arts, Avd. Andalucia S/N, Granada, Spain
d
University of Granada; Department of Management-1, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Campus de Cartuja, s/n 18071,
Granada, Spain
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Keywords: The role of crafts on a global level has accrued importance at present, both for developing
Crafts countries and for rural development in general. Governments and institutions are increasingly
Local development trying to promote rural development to fight against the flight of the population from rural areas.
Bibliometric analysis
Crafts is considered an important tool for local economic development and job creation. The goal
Sustainable development
of this study is to use bibliometric analysis to analyze the advances in research in the field of crafts
and their influence on the development of rural communities. It also aims to identify the main
lines of research that are currently being addressed as future trends. This analysis has provided a
global, systematic and visual overview of the 1379 studies related to the role of crafts in the
development of rural areas, published from 1954, year in which the first publication appeared, up
to 2021. Growth trends have been identified in the number of articles published, magazines,
authors, institutions and most productive countries. Results have shown that the most popular
lines of research on this subject are those in which crafts are considered a source of income for
local communities, particularly linked to tourism, job creation and sustainability in the first place;
followed by research on the demographic and economic effects of new craft products and pro
cesses on rural areas; and those that consider crafts as a factor to mitigate poverty in the rural
world. Therefore, the concept of handicrafts as a source of livelihood for poor rural regions is
primarily emphasized.
1. Introduction
In recent decades, rural development has involved a growing effort by governments, as shown by initiatives such as the Craft
Project or Interreg Europe’s Craftscode such as the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), with a budget of 95.5
billion euros for the period 2021–2027 [1].
In 2018, more than 30% of the EU’s population lived in rural areas, occupying an area of 83% of its total surface [2]. According to
* Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (D. Fernández Bellver), [email protected] (M.B. Prados-Peña), [email protected] (A.M. García-López), vmolina2@
go.ugr.es (V. Molina-Moreno).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13039
Received 1 August 2022; Received in revised form 12 January 2023; Accepted 13 January 2023
Available online 16 January 2023
2405-8440/© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
D. Fernández Bellver et al. Heliyon 9 (2023) e13039
the mentioned report, the population in rural areas has the highest age rates in the EU (over 50 years of age); showing the highest
percentage of the population at risk of social exclusion and the decrease in the rural active population. In 2018, the average GDP per
capita in rural regions was only 75% of the EU average [2]. Although in 2020, 43.84% of the world’s population lived in rural areas
[3], there is a clear rural demographic decline [4]. European projects such as ESCAPE [4] or the Plan of Measures to Combat the
Demographic Challenge promoted by the Spanish Government’s Ministry for the Ecological Transition and the Demographic Chal
lenge, with a budget of more than 10 billion euros, and the main goals of fighting against depopulation and ensuring social and
territorial cohesion, show the involvement of institutions and governments in combating this decline. In addition, rural areas face not
only demographic changes, aging population, and greater risk of exclusion, but also present a high risk of poverty [2]. It is interesting
to note that “poverty still has an overwhelmingly rural face” [5].
Fighting against the flight of population from rural areas to cities and efforts to reduce territorial inequalities relies mainly in rural
development. In this context, crafts are crucial to combat depopulation [6].
Furthermore, crafts have traditionally stood out in the rural world as a source of job creation [7]. In this sense, there are also
European projects, such as the European Network of Rural Artisans, which defines crafts as “part of the economy, due to their capacity
to generate employment, as an element of social cohesion in the territories and as a potential tourist resource and distinctive culture
resource of the counties” [8]. Moreover, according to Richards creative tourism allows a bridge between local and global creativity to
be established, a key aspect, according to this author, to encourage innovation and community development, being especially
important for local communities. Therefore, the emergence of tourist crafts in rural areas, provided by local people, is a source of
subsistence or economic well-being that is linked to growing tourism [9] being craft itself, most of the time, a motivation for tourism
development [10]. Many villages base their income on the sale of regional and local handicraft products to tourists ([11–14]).
Furthermore, the importance of the impact of crafts on GDP must be highlighted, especially in developing countries, in which
activities such as artisanal mining has a direct impact on employment and represent a large contribution to national GDP ([7,15]).
Crafts contribute to job creation with a significant role in rural development ([16–18]). It was possible to verify the growing
concern both at the international level and at the national level due to the existing inequality at the territorial level between urban
areas and increasingly depopulated rural areas.
With regard to the environmental aspects, it was possible to demonstrate that craftsmanship can achieve the best possible work
performance without damaging the environment ([19]), conserving biodiversity and helping poorer communities to access higher
incomes [20]. Arts and crafts can therefore be a sustainable business [21]. In this sense, crafts are a cleaner, more sustainable and
ecological activity than industrial activities, such as, for example, the production of craft beer [22]; fashion designs [23]; batik pro
duction in Indonesia [24]; papermaking [25]; jewelry processes [26]; or the use of wood waste to treat gray water [27].
Having analyzed all these factors, it is also important to look at whether this interest is reflected in the academic community.
1.1. Objetives
This research aims to discover the studies that have been published to date on crafts and their influence on the development of rural
areas.
It develops a bibliometric analysis with the aim of highlighting the importance of crafts as a factor in the development of rural
areas, as well as its possible contributions within the framework of sustainable development, the promotion of employment, the
movement of the population out of rural areas, the development of tourism and the advantages that crafts can offer compared to other
sectors. Furthermore, it is considered of interest in the study to outline ideas of circular economy in the field of handicrafts.
2. Literature review
2.1. Crafts
Craft production can be defined as the production of “an item that fulfils a function, requires the use of hands to create and uses
materials identified as natural” ([28]), pp. 140). Craft is a highly sustainable activity [29]; contributes positively to job creation [17];
and tourism development. Tourists have expressed their interest in the local traditional crafts of the areas they visit, promoting
heritage conservation and restoration activities, employment creation and improvement incomes for the local population living near
historic environments [30].
Besides, it can also encourage a better use of materials and processes an environmentally conscious attitude as expressed in the
following extract:
“The importance of inherited crafts and traditions presented in physical and moral heritage for every region was evident. When the built
environment is designed in consistency with the existing heritage and people traditions, it facilitates the establishment of craftsmanship
and the mental image of the place. It helps fulfilling the needs of the residents and positively affects their behavior with the environment as
well as the visitors” ([31], pp. 22)
On the other hand, crafts often have local identity as a differentiating element, due to knowledge of the context in which craft is
developed, cultural response, holistic practices or production the local community to which the handicrafts belong [32]. These authors
identify tradition as a characteristic of craftsmanship, recognizing the product, the manufacturing process and the history or ideas that
surround it as elements that have passed on from generations to generations, adding a particular value to each work of art.
2
2.2. Rural development
Rural development, as a measure to avoid depopulation through migration to urban areas, faces the main challenge of providing
rural people with economic resources (in terms of income, as opposed to urban areas with more and better employment and entre
preneurship opportunities) ([12,30]); technological improvements and resources, such as direct access to electricity, internet and
water [33] or transport, both passenger and goods accessibility, sufficient to improve the quality of life of the inhabitants of a rural
region [34], thus helping to avoid the well-known “rural exodus".
Due to the importance of rural development, the Cork Declaration took place in 1996, as a result of the European Conference on
Rural Development; in recent decades, millions of euros have been invested by governments to alleviate this phenomenon.
One of the objectives of rural development is poverty alleviation. Several aspects need to be taken into consideration when fighting
poverty such as boosting the agricultural engine, analyzing the viability of small farms, the rural non-farm economy, and implementing
appropriate government measures [35]. Energy access can contribute to poverty reduction. The new technologies are also helping the
agricultural sector to save time and resources, improve communications and Internet access, lengthen the working day thanks to more
and better lighting, among other things [33]. Regarding the internet, access to information as a source of knowledge and commu
nication possibilities are essential to empower rural communities [36], and e-commerce possibilities can help increase sales.
2.3. Crafts and rural development
Craft activity clearly favours rural development ([7,19,37]; among others). On the one hand, according to Richards and Sanchis,
Serrano and Köster, crafts have a direct effect on employment in rural areas. In fact, several case studies have observed how crafts have
been the protagonist of a great expansion in the 21st century due to the promotion of employment, in addition to the creation of new
links between companies and the development of local trade [38]. On the other hand, and according to Ref. [19], crafts are a source of
income for local communities and a sustainable activity. In this context, it is not surprising that crafts are key actions in governments
and public administration’s policies in fighting against rural demographic decline ([4,39,40]). There are numerous examples of this,
such as the revitalization of local businesses and communities through crafts and cultural heritage in Japan [11], the importance of
crafts for rural development and the keys to their development in China and India ([12,41]), or rural markets, the key part of which are
craft enterprises. These can be the basis for development, innovation, business networks and supply chains, functioning as an engine of
money circulation in local UK economies [42].
Moreover, tourism is an important source of income for local communities worldwide ([9,10,42]); and, in particular, the sale of
locally produced handicrafts ([11–14]).
Given the importance of crafts in local development and the current problems in relation to rural areas, the aim of this research is to
analyze the degree of interest that this topic has aroused in academic literature; besides, it aims to determine to what extent can crafts
can be considered a productive sector that encourages the development of rural areas. In addition, we will try to identify the role of the
circular economy and its influence in this field of research. It seeks to answer the following research questions to achieve valuable
Fig. 1. Methodology.
Source: Author’s own conception, based on Microsoft Word software.
3
results:
Q1. What was the direction of this area of research since its inception?
Q2. What characteristics do the most important publications have?
Q3. Which countries, authors and institutions are the most important in this field of research?
Q4. Is there international cooperation? If so, how do countries, authors and institutions cooperate?
Q5. How have the lines of research evolved to date?
Q6. Within the scope of this study, what relevance and evolution does the concept of the circular economy have?
3. Methodology
To carry out this research, bibliometric analysis technique has been used. Bibliometric analysis or scientometrics is a technique that
consists of the application of mathematical and statistical methods to carry out a quantitative study of bibliographic units ([43–45]),
making it possible to understand the path and evolution of a certain subject area.
The following steps are involved in this methodology, as shown in Fig. 1, and detailed below, in accordance with the structure of
presentation of research methods followed by Cicea et al.:
a) Choosing the scientific database. First, the Scopus database was used for the selection of documents. The decision of using Scopus
database in based on the largest volume of information regarding authors, countries and institutions provided ([18,46]). In
addition, it contains the largest volume of articles and journals that meet the scientific quality requirements for peer review [47]. Its
coverage is greater than that of the Web of Science [48] and it shows additional details of the publications [49]. Therefore, the
Scopus platform was used to identify published academic works that would allow the contribution of sustainable crafts to the
economic development of rural areas to be analyzed.
b) Creating a proper search syntax. Secondly, the search string was created considering keywords that link handicraft terms with rural
development. After several tests in which different keywords were added and removed to find the best result, the final search
resulted as follows: KEYWORDS (“craft” OR “crafts” OR “handicraft” OR “handicrafts” OR “craftmanship” OR “Artisans”) AND
(“rural” OR “rural areas” OR “rural development”). This search acknowledges any publication that includes any of the terms
included in the first parenthesis (craft terms in general) and in which, in addition, any of the terms in the second parenthesis
(related to the rural world) appear.
c) Establishing the time span for the analysis. Regarding the time horizon, we felt that it was reasonable for the analysis to consider all
the available years, to analyze the evolution of this line of research since its inception. The bibliographic search was carried out in
February 2022 and 1379 documents were found.
d) Choosing the proper software for the Research. The VosViewer tool was used to develop visual analyses and diagrams of the in
formation obtained. This tool is used to generate network maps of each variable, so that they can be grouped by clusters, establish
Fig. 2. Evolution and trend of scientific production. Period 1954–2021.

Source: Author’s own conception, based on Microsoft Excel software.
4
relationship maps and process the terms included in the documents researched [50], thus showing the research topics that may be
of most interest to the scientific community.
As mentioned above, Fig. 1 summarizes the methodological procedure described. In this way, the relationships between the
publications were obtained, which allowed the conclusions of this research to be established and the trend of future lines of research
based on this theme to be defined.
4. Results
The search string used by Scopus resulted in 1379 publications found, which were used to carry out the analyses that are subse
quently developed. However, when evaluating and comparing journals, collecting the keywords and observing the evolution of the
lines of research, only articles were considered, disregarding all other published documents for ease of comparison and understanding.
Being only articles considered, the search yielded 1031 results. This was taken into account to ensure a higher scientific quality [48].
Thus, all documents were considered in the analyses related to scientific production, thematic areas, the productivity of publications of
authors, countries, institutions, or international collaboration between them and only the articles were taken into account for the
analyses of magazines and keywords. As for the time horizon, the entire available period was considered, excluding year 2022. The
results show publications from 1954 up to the end of 2021.
4.1. Evolution of scientific production
Scientific production began with a publication in 1954, although there are years in which no publication related to the subject is
found. Subsequently, production grows until a clear exponential trend can be seen. Fig. 2 shows the evolution of publications.
The Fig. 3 shows annual ecolution of scientific production since 1996 until 2021. The analysis focused on the period 1996–2021 for
several reasons: on the one hand, the scarce scientific production, as well as its little importance; and on the other hand, in 1996, the
European Conference on Rural Development culminated in the Cork Declaration, which was a new guide in rural development [51].
All this gave rise to a growing evolution, both in publications, institutions and participating countries as well as in the number of
citations in the study area.
Table 1 presents a summary of the characteristics of scientific production in the field of crafts in the rural world.
A growing trend in the number of documents can be observed, showing the importance that this area of research has acquired in
recent years. Greater growth is observed as of 2008, the year of the global financial crisis, which brought about important changes in
Fig. 3. Annual evolution of scientific production. Period 1996–2021.

5
Table 1
Characteristics of scientific production.
Year Articles Authors Countries Institutions Citations Journals Citations per article Average number of authors
1996 9 10 9 9 51 8 5.67 1.11

1997 5 5 3 4 44 5 8.8 1
1998 18 30 8 27 50 17 2.78 1.67
1999 13 28 9 15 38 13 2.92 2.15
2000 23 43 18 32 62 23 2.7 1.87
2001 21 33 15 26 63 21 3 1.57
2002 22 31 14 23 74 20 3.36 1.41
2003 19 34 12 27 105 19 5.53 1.79
2004 30 47 14 44 133 28 4.43 1.57
2005 22 38 20 29 137 20 6.23 1.73
2006 25 38 13 20 176 22 7.04 1.52
2007 28 50 19 44 201 28 7.18 1.79
2008 35 65 23 52 232 31 6.63 1.86
2009 34 66 22 48 260 32 7.65 1.94
2010 41 68 22 58 283 40 6.9 1.66
2011 56 144 29 95 321 56 5.73 2.57
2012 44 86 22 59 373 40 8.48 1.95
2013 70 145 33 94 419 67 5.99 2.07
2014 47 143 31 95 418 43 8.89 3.04
2015 59 136 26 114 476 59 8.07 2.31
2016 62 151 40 109 590 62 9.52 2.44
2017 93 186 36 128 693 84 7.45 2.00
2018 84 213 39 149 726 75 8.64 2.54
2019 107 274 50 193 785 87 7.34 2.56
2020 101 245 48 167 968 83 9.58 2.43
2021 107 318 42 222 1152 96 10.77 2.97
2001–2021 1107 2511 570 1796 8585 1013 7.76 2.08
Source: Author’s own calculation, based on Microsoft Excel software.
rural areas, accentuating the segmentation between countries and regions and producing “massive cuts in the public budget,” giving
rise to a worsening of employment in rural areas, especially in the most remote ones [52]. However, some authors such as [53]
Giannakis and Bruggeman observe an increase in migration to rural areas as a consequence of the crisis, given that, according to them,
rural areas cope better with economic crises than urban areas, with a better and greater response capacity [17].
4.2. Analysis of scientific production
This section shows the results of the analysis of the thematic areas, journals, authors and countries in which the selected works have
been researched.
Fig. 4. Scientific production by thematic areas.

6
4.2.1. Distribution of publications by thematic area

Fig. 4 shows the scientific production by thematic areas. Of the 26 areas identified, Social Sciences is the one with the highest
volume of documents (n = 631; 26.8%), almost double the quantity of the following, Arts and Humanities, (n = 336; 14.3%) and
Environmental Sciences (n = 238; 10.1%). The fourth place is occupied by Agricultural Sciences and Biology (n = 185; 7.86%). These
four areas concentrate 59% of the publications. This implies that the remaining 41% is distributed among 22 thematic areas, which
shows the growing importance of this area of study not only in a thematic area but from different perspectives.
4.2.2. Most cited articles

Table 2 shows the 10 most cited articles of the entire search carried out.
The most cited article is by Snell [54]. This is a collection of essays studying economic and social change in workers and craftsmen
in rural areas of the South of England and Wales from the mid-seventeenth century to the end of the nineteenth century. In a similar
vein, Epstein [55] reports the important role of craft guilds during the Middle Ages and the role they played in pre-industrial times.
Other articles analyze the economic impact of different activities in rural areas, such as the article by Bhagavatula et al. [56] These
authors highlight the importance of small businesses in rural areas as a key factor for the development of any country and specifically
study the case of India and how social and human capital influences the mobilization of resources and the recognition of opportunities.
For their part, Farsani et al. analyze the role of geoparks and geotourism and the importance of rural areas and the crafts sector for
economic development in this context. Long et al. [57] analyze the economic impact of rural arts and crafts festivals on the local
community and to what extent they contribute to the economic development of the community.
Other studies analyze some of the factors that help the development of small rural businesses, such as the work of Cecchini and
Scott [58]. These authors show how ICT can help farmers and artisans to improve their quality of life. In a very similar line, Reijonen
et al. analyze the perceptions and attitudes of entrepreneurs in small craft and rural tourism businesses, describing attitudes of success
and growth.
Finally, other articles analyze the value of certain goods and their influence in the world of crafts and the rural world. Thus, Godoy
et al. discusses the importance of the value of the tropical forest and how local residents receive a small part of its value; as well as the
value of crafts, food, medicines or construction and their influence on the motivation to deforest. For their part, Gandini and Villa [59]
analyze the cultural value of native livestock and its influence on life in rural areas. These authors also consider various factors, such as
crafts or folklore, roles in the agricultural system and the landscape, etc., to assess the historical value of a local breed. Lastly, Paxson
[60] deals with the craft of cheese, its influence in obtaining a superior quality, improving the environment, and achieving the eco
nomic revitalization of the rural world.
4.2.3. Author productivity

This section presents the results of the productivity of the authors and international cooperation networks in the period analyzed.
For the analysis of the cooperation network, it was taken into consideration whether they had at least two publications in crafts and
rural development. Table 3 shows the authors who were most in the line of research.
The most productive authors are Banik, A. from India, Baumann, V.H. from Romania, Bhaumik P.K., also from India, Eyferth J.,
from the United States and Rogerson C.M., from South Africa, with 4 publications in the area. Rogerson C.M. is the one with the highest
H-index in the publications of the analyzed field [4]; they are followed by Eyferth J. and Braedt O., with an index of 3.
Concerning the dissemination of the results, measured according to the number of citations per article, the author with the highest
average number of citations is Rogerson C.M., with an average of 17.25 citations, followed by Braedt O. and Braunegg G., with 11 and
Table 2
The most cited articles.
Authors Title Year Nº
citations
Snell, K.D.M. Annals of the labouring poor: social change and agrarian England 1985 450
1660–1900.
Epstein, S.R. Craft guilds, apprenticeship, and technological change in preindustrial 1998 300
Europe
Bhagavatula, S., Elfring, T., van Tilburg, A., van de Bunt, G. How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and 2010 219
G. resource mobilization in India’s handloom industry
Cecchini, S., Scott, C. Can information and communications technology applications contribute 2003 193
to poverty reduction? Lessons from rural India
Farsani, N.T., Coelho, C., Costa, C. Geotourism and geoparks as novel strategies for socio-economic 2011 178
development in rural areas
Long, P.T., Perdue, R.R. The Economic Impact Of Rural Festivals And Special Events: Assessing The 1990 151
Spatial Distribution Of Expenditures
Reijonen, H., Komppula, R. Perception of success and its effect on small firm performance 2007 131
Godoy, R., Wilkie, D., Overman, H., Cubas, A., Cubas, G., Valuation of consumption and sale of forest goods from a Central American 2000 124
Demmer, J., Mcsweeney, K., Brokaw, N. rain forest
Gandini, G.C., Villa, E. Analysis of the cultural value of local livestock breeds: A methodology 2003 114
Paxson, H. Locating Value in Artisan Cheese: Reverse Engineering Terroir for New- 2010 97
World Landscapes
7
Table 3
List of the 10 most productive authors.
Authors A CT CT/A Institution P 1st A UA H
Banik, A. 4 12 3.00 International Management Institute, New Delhi India 2005 2018 2
Baumann, V.H. 4 12 3.00 Institutul de Cercetǎri Eco-Muzeale, Tulcea Rumanía 2009 2017 2
Bhaumik, P.K. 4 12 3.00 International Management Institute, New Delhi India 2005 2018 2
Eyferth, J. 4 24 6.00 The University of Chicago United States 2003 2006 3
Rogerson, C.M. 4 69 17.25 College of Business and Economics, Johannesburg South Africa 1986 2019 4
Basak, J. 3 3 1.00 Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Kolkata India 2018 2020 1
Bhattacharjya, B.R. 3 9 3.00 Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati India 2019 2020 2
Braedt, O. 3 33 11.00 Bundesforschungsanstalt fur Forst Und Holzwirtschaft, Hamburg Germany 2000 2003 3
Braunegg, G. 3 26 8.67 ARENA Research for Sustainable Resources, Graz Austria 2016 2020 2
Dang, T.D. 3 21 7.00 Australian Defence Force School of Languages Australia 2013 2020 2
(A): Number of published documents (CT): total citations; (CT/A): average citations per article; (P): Country; 1st A: year of first publication; U A: year
of last publication; (H): Index H in the line of research.
8.67 average citations, respectively.

Additionally, using the VosViewer tool, a map was generated showing the international cooperation networks of the co-authors that
address the issue of crafts and their influence on rural development (see Fig. 5). For a total of 2767 authors, when selecting an
interaction of at least 2 published articles, a total of 145 authors were obtained, of which only 9 formed a single cluster of international
cooperation in the line of research.
It is noteworthy that none of the 10 most productive authors in the line of research belongs to an international cooperation network.
Therefore, it can be stated that there is hardly any international cooperation network of co-authors in the line of research.
4.2.4. Productivity of journals, institutions and countries

This section shows the productivity and cooperation of research in the area studied by journals, institutions and countries. Table 4
shows the 10 most productive journals.
The Journal of Rural Studies, from the United Kingdom, is the one with the most publications on the subject, with 9 articles; it is
followed by Sustainability, from Switzerland, with 7. However, the ones with the greatest circulation, due to the average number of
Fig. 5. Map of international cooperation.

Source: VosViewer v. 1.6.18.
8
citations per article, are the International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research and the American Economic Botany, with an
average number of citations per article of 24.4 and 23 respectively.
Concerning the H-index, the journal World Development with an H-index of 175 stands out from the others, followed by the Journal
of Rural Studies, with an H-index of 104. Both journals belong to the United Kingdom.
Regarding the institutions, Table 5 shows the most productive institutions of the analyzed period.
The most productive Institution is the University of KwaZulu-Natal, in South Africa, with 10 publications in the area of study. They
are followed by the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign in the United States and the University of the Witwatersrand, Johan
nesburg, also in South Africa, with 9 publications each.
The institutions with a higher H-index are the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg in South Africa (H-index of 6),
followed by the London School of Economics and Political Science in the United Kingdom and the University of California, Los Angeles,
in the United States, both with an H-index of 5. The institutions with the lowest H-index are the Indian Institute of Technology
Guwahati, India and the University of South Africa, with an H-index of 2.
On the other hand, concerning the dissemination of results and the average number of citations of the publications in the line of
research, the most cited institution is the London School of Economics and Political Science, with an average of 77 citations per article.
The institution with the lowest average number of citations per article is the Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati with 1.83 ci
tations per article.
Regarding the network of international cooperation between institutions, the Københavns Universitet in Germany is the institution
with the highest rate of international cooperation, with 66.7% of its publications in cooperation. They are followed by the London
School of Economics and Political Science and the University of British Columbia in Canada, with rates of 57.1% and 50%, respectively.
The institutions that collaborate the least are the South African University of KwaZulu-Natal, from South Africa, with 10%, and the
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, from Brazil, which stands out for not conducting any type of international cooperation.
Fig. 6 shows the international cooperation networks of the institutions. Of 1987 institutions identified, an interaction of at least 2
articles was selected and 31 international institutions were identified. The absence of connections denotes an absence of international
collaboration between institutions in the line of research.
If, on the other hand, we analyze the productivity and collaboration between countries, Table 6 shows the countries that have had
the most publications on the subject of study.
In terms of productivity, the United States is the country with the most publications (197 publications), followed closely by India
and the United Kingdom, with 155 and 127 publications, leaving a gap with the next country, South Africa, which has 50 publications
in the area of study.
The United States is also the country that has achieved the greatest dissemination of its results, with by far the highest number of
citations (a total of 2,520), followed by the United Kingdom with 1,962. However, the average number of citations, which is the best
indicator of scientific quality, puts the UK in first place, with an average of 15.45 citations, followed by Canada and the US, with an
average of 13.45 and 12.79, respectively.
Lastly, the H-Index places the United States firmly in the lead, with an H-Index of 26.
Regarding international collaboration, the United States and the United Kingdom are the countries with the highest number of
international collaborators with 26 and 17 respectively. However, most of their articles are published with domestic authors, since
their collaboration index is 16.8 and 27.6. Canada and China are the countries with the highest rate of collaboration, with rates of
36.4% and 32.6%, respectively. The least collaborative countries are India and Indonesia (6.5% and 7.9%, respectively). In this case,
the two countries that collaborate the least are also the ones that have the fewest average citations.
Fig. 7 shows 6 different clusters, identified by colours, showing international collaboration networks. For a total of 142 identified
countries, an interaction of at least ten published articles was applied, and 46 countries were identified, which made up 6 international
cooperation networks.
The two most numerous clusters are made up of 7 countries each and are headed by the United States, on the one hand, and the
United Kingdom, on the other.
Table 7 summarizes the clusters and their distribution by country. The cluster in which the United States is integrated is the one that
Table 4
List of the 10 most productive journals.
Journal A TC TC/ H index articles H index journal SJR C
A
Journal of Rural Studies 9 103 11.4 5 104 1.497 (Q1) United Kingdom
Sustainability (Switzerland) 7 88 12.6 5 85 0.612 (Q2) Switzerland
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research 5 122 24.4 5 67 1.241 (Q1) United Kingdom
Economic Botany 5 115 23.0 4 70 0.491 (Q2) United States
World Archaeology 5 107 21.4 4 66 0.926 (Q1) United Kingdom
World Development 5 75 15.0 5 175 2.386 (Q1) United Kingdom
Journal of Peasant Studies 5 64 12.8 4 83 3.110 (Q1) United Kingdom
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 5 71 14.2 4 69 0.741 (Q1) United Kingdom
Rural History 4 36 9.0 4 18 0.155 (Q3) United Kingdom
Journal of Family History 3 45 15.0 3 22 0.169 (Q3) United States
9
Table 5
List of the 10 most productive institutions.
Institutions C A CT CT/A H IC (%) CT/A
CI NIC
University of KwaZulu-Natal South Africa 10 34 3.4 4 10.0 4.0 3.3

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign United States 9 60 6.77 4 22.2 2.0 8.0
University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg South Africa 9 139 15.4 6 22.2 6.0 18.1
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco Brasil 7 36 5.1 3 0.0 0.0 5.1
London School of Economics and Political Science United Kingdom 7 539 77.0 5 57.1 52.3 110.0
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati India 6 11 1.8 2 33.3 1.0 2.3
The University of British Columbia Canada 6 87 14.5 4 50.0 16.7 12.3
University of California, Los Angeles United States 6 174 29.0 5 16.7 26.0 29.6
Københavns Universitet Denmark 6 40 6.7 3 66.7 4.3 11.5
University of South Africa South Africa 5 21 4.2 2 20.0 2.0 4.8
(C): Country; (A): Number of articles published (CT): total citations; (CT/A): average citations per article; (H): Index H in the line of research; (IC):
Cooperation Index; (TC/A IC): Average number of citations with international cooperation; (TC/A NIC): Average number of citations without in
ternational cooperation.
Fig. 6. Map of international collaboration between institutions.

10
Table 6
Publications by country.
Country A CT CT/A H NC PPC IC (%) TC/A
IC NIC
United States 197 2520 12.8 26 36 Canada, China, Australia, United Kingdom, India, Peru 16.8 19.4 11.5
India 155 871 5.2 12 8 Netherlands, United States 6.5 26.1 4.2
United Kingdom 127 1962 15.5 17 27 China, Canada, Ireland, Netherlands, United States 27.6 17.6 14.6
South Africa 50 486 9.7 12 11 Zimbabwe, Germany 24.0 12.3 8.9
Canada 44 592 13.5 13 17 United States, United Kingdom 36.4 20.8 9.3
China 43 301 7.0 9 9 United States, United Kingdom, Australia 32.6 14.4 3.4
Indonesia 38 63 1.7 5 4 Australia, Japan, Malaysia, United Kingdom 7.9 1.3 1.7
Italy 38 327 8.6 10 8 Brazil, Canada, Comoros, France, Germany 21.1 8.3 8.7
Brazil 36 248 6.9 9 5 Italy, Mexico, Mozambique, United Kingdom, United States 13.9 15.2 5.6
France 34 252 7.4 8 12 Morocco 23.5 10.5 6,5
(P): Country; (A): Number of publications; (CT): total citations; (CT/A): average citations per article; (H): Index H in the line of research; (NC):
Publications without international collaboration; PPC: Main collaborating countries; (IC): Cooperation Index; (TC/A IC): Average number of citations
with international cooperation; (TC/A NIC): Average number of citations without international cooperation.
Fig. 7. Map of international cooperation networks by country.

Table 7
Collaboration clusters between countries.
Clúster Countries Publications Citations
1 United States, Brazil, France, Italy, Mexico, Portugal and Spain 365 3831
2 UK,Austria, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Romania and Vietnam 246 2338
3 India, Germany, Iran, the Netherlands, Russia and South Africa 295 2092
4 Australia, Denmark and Sweden 53 533
5 Canada, Finland and Turkey 67 842
6 China and Poland 53 310
11
Table 8
D. Fernández Bellver et al.

Top ten countries and most important publications.
Country Most cited publications Author Year Cites
United States Valuation of consumption and sale of forest goods from a Central American rain forest Godoy et al. 2000 125
Locating Value in Artisan Cheese: Reverse Engineering Terroir for New-World Landscapes Paxson, H. 2010 106
Tree and impervious cover in the United States Nowak, D.J., Greenfield, E.J. 2012 99
Filipina migrants in rural Japan and their professions of love Faier, L. 2007 99
India How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in India’s handloom industry Bhagavatula et al. 2010 239
Prehistoric human colonization of India Misra, V.N. 2001 137
Body mass index: A measure of the nutritional status in Indian populations Naidu, A.N., Rao, N.P. 1994 117
Drudgery, Accidents and Injuries in Indian Agriculture Nag, P.K., Nag, A. 2004 73
United Kingdom Annals of the labouring poor: social change and agrarian England 1660-1900 Snell, K.D.M. 1985 467
Craft guilds, apprenticeship, and technological change in preindustrial Europe Epstein, S.R. 1998 309
Can information and communications technology applications contribute to poverty reduction? Lessons from rural India Cecchini, S., Scott, C. 2003 199
Fracture trauma in a medieval British farming village Judd, M.A., Roberts, C.A. 1999 94
South Africa Tourist preferences for ecotourism in rural communities adjacent to Kruger National Park: A choice experiment approach Chaminuka et al. 2012 95
The traditional use of plants to manage candidiasis and related infections in Venda, South Africa Masevhe, N.A., McGaw, L.J., Eloff, J.N. 2015 49
Tourism, food, and culture: Community-based tourism, local food, and community development in mpondoland Giampiccoli, A., Kalis, J.H. 2012 45
Rural economy and livelihoods from the non-timber forest products trade. Compromising sustainability in southern Africa? Dovie, D.B.K. 2003 40
Canada Valuation of consumption and sale of forest goods from a Central American rain forest Godoy et al. 2000 125
Fracture trauma in a medieval British farming village Judd, M.A., Roberts, C.A. 1999 94
Rain forest ‘conservation-through-use’? Chambira palm fibre extraction and handicraft production in a land-constrained Coomes, O.T. 2004 38
community, Peruvian Amazon
Commodity production and ethnic culture: Otavalo, northern Ecuador Korovkin, T. 1998 38
China Settlement patterns and development of social complexity in the Yiluo Region, North China Liu et al. 2004 86
Environmental impacts and embodied energy of construction methods and materials in low-income tropical housing Hashemi, et al. 2015 39
China’s Hidden Agricultural Revolution, 1980–2010, in Historical and Comparative Perspective Huang, P.C.C. 2016 30
12
The Income Gap Between Urban and Rural Residents in China: Since 1978 Ma et al. 2018 25
Indonesia The diversity of plant species, the types of plant uses and the estimate of carbon stock in agroforestry system in Harapan Makmur Wiryono, Puteri, V.N.U., Senoaji, G. 2016 13
Village, Bengkulu, Indonesia
Hobby and business on trading birds: Case study in bird market of Sukahaji, Bandung, West Java and Splendid, Malang, East Java Iskandar, B.S., Iskandar, J., Partasasmita, R. 2019 12
(Indonesia)
Species diversity and utilization of bamboo to support life’s the community of Karangwangi village, Cidaun sub-district of Setiawati et al. 2017 9
Cianjur, Indonesia
The use by local communities of plants from sesaot protected forest, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia Hidayat, S. 2017 7
Italy Analysis of the cultural value of local livestock breeds: A methodology Gandini, G.C., Villa, E. 2003 118
Sustainable rural development: The role of traditional activities in Central Italy Gobattoni, et al. 2015 30
Traditional uses of plants in a rural community of Mozambique and possible links with Miombo degradation and harvesting Bruschi et al. 2014 29
sustainability
Increasing the value of spent grain from craft microbreweries for energy purposes Sperandio et al. 2017 26
Brazil Ethnobotany and effects of harvesting on the population ecology of Syngonanthus nitens (Bong.) Ruhland (Eriocaulaceae), a Schmidt, I.B., Figueiredo, I.B.,https://www. 2007 75
NTFP from Jalapao region, central Brazil scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?origin=resultslist&
authorId=6507887219&zone=Scariot,A
Ethnobotany in Cabo Delgado, mozambique: Use of medicinal plants Matavele, J., Habib, M. 2000 37
Experimental harvesting of the non-timber forest product Ischnosiphon polyphyllus in central Amazonia Nakazono, E.M., Bruna, E.M., Mesquita, R.C.G. 2004 22
Knowledge, Use, and Management of the Babassu Palm (Attalea speciosa Mart. ex Spreng) in the Araripe Region (Northeastern Almeida Campos et al. 2015 19
Heliyon 9 (2023) e13039

Brazil)
France Traditional food and tourism: French tourist experience and food heritage in rural spaces Bessiere, J., Tibere, L. 2013 75
Beekeeping as a family artisan entrepreneurship business Ramadani et al. 2019 45
The French peasantry in the seventeenth century. Goubert, P. 1986 38
Physical activity patterns of rural Senegalese adolescent girls during the dry and rainy seasons measured by movement Bénéfice, E., Cames, C. 1999 36
registration and direct observation methods
Source: Author’s own calculation, based on Microsoft Excel software

surpasses all others in publications and citations, followed by the United Kingdom’s cluster, with the China-Poland cluster in last place.
On the other hand, Table 8 shows the top ten countries and most cited publications in each country.
4.2.5. Keyword analysis

The keyword analysis was carried out on the articles of the search for the area of crafts as a factor in the development of rural areas.
In total, through the Scopus platform, 1033 articles were found from which the keywords would be extracted for the period
1954–2021.
The tool used for the analysis was VosViewer. There was a total of 3232 keywords in the search. On the one hand, Fig. 8 shows the
ten more mentioned keywords.
As Fig. 8 shows, the key word “Developing country”, also in its plural form, are the most used key words shown as result in this
research, with a total of 98 appearances. Terms that show links between crafts and rural development follow the list of those that have
been frequently used in the development of the research. These are “Employment”, “Sustainable development”, “Agriculture”, a term
closely related to crafts in terms of the rural world, due to its relationship with the production of handicrafts for sale to tourists. These
are followed by terms “Economics” and “Sustainability”, two very generic terms in this line of research, and “Demography”, another
important concept within this work, since it approaches the problem of demographic decline. “Tourism”, a term strongly related to
crafts from the point of view of its development and potential. Concluding with two different related and generic terms, namely
“Economic development” and “Education”, being the last one included in this research in two aspects: on the one hand as a measure of
development, on the one hand, and as ways of transmission of craft skills.
Table 9 shows for each of the main keywords identified, the publication containing them as well as the publication, its author/
authors and the year of publication (see Table 9).
Table 9 shows a summary of the most cited publications containing the ten most important keywords mentioned.
Finally, a minimum of 10 matches were considered, obtaining a result of 90 keywords and the search was refined by eliminating
those that included terms from the initial search, such as “rural” or “craft,” as well as other words that were discarded due to their
nature as academic terms, research, or other unrelated topics. Thus, a final set of 39 clustered keywords was reached (see Fig. 9).
Fig. 9 shows the clusters of keywords included in the analysis, a total of 36. Three clusters are distinguished in red, green and blue.
The largest cluster is the red cluster, made up of 15 items. It is followed by the green cluster with 13 items and finally, the blue cluster,
with 8 items.
On the other hand, Fig. 10, concerning research trends, shows the most innovative lines of research in the keywords with lighter
colours. Some concepts were introduced as relevant in the 2010s and seem to belong mostly to a single cluster, one which seems to be
increasingly developing today.
Fig. 11 summarizes graphically the most relevant future lines of research in relation to the importance of crafts in sustainable rural
development.
Next, the most relevant contributions of these lines of research and their evolution are developed, considering what is observed in
Figs. 9 and 10.
4.2.5.1. Cluster 1: Economic development of local communities in rural areas. Cluster 1: Economic development of local communities in
rural areas.
Fig. 8. Ten more mentioned keywords

13
Table 9
D. Fernández Bellver et al.

Top ten keywords and most important publications.
Author’s publications Author Year
Keyword
Developing Marketing rural products in India Kashyap, P. 1991

contry/ies The contribution of non farm activities to rural employment promotion: Experience in Iran, India and Syria Guha, S. 1974
The growth of household industry in rural Wenzhou Li Shi 1990
An integrated ecosystem incorporating renewable energy leading to pollution reduction for sustainable Le et al. 2016
development of craft villages in rural area: a case study at sedge mats village in Mekong Delta, Vietnam
Employment Mothers and Godmothers of Crafts: Female Leadership and the Imagination of India as a Crafts Nation, 1947–67 McGowan, A. 2021
Challenges to sustainable growth of the micro-scale kuhila craft industry of India Majumdar, P., Banerjee, S. 2017
Application of online trading market in rural handicraft protection design strategy: - Take “Fang yuan” app Dai, Y., Yang, D. 2020
handicraft exchange trading platform as an example
The contribution of non farm activities to rural employment promotion: Experience in Iran, India and Syria Guha, S. 1974
Sustainable WECRAFT: A Platform for Networking Rural Craftsmen in Co-Production of Artisanal Crafts Guerrieri, P.M., Comai, S., Fugini, M. 2021
development Challenges to sustainable growth of the micro-scale kuhila craft industry of India Majumdar, P., Banerjee, S. 2017
Environmental protection policies at craft villages in Hanoi in the context of sustainable development Nguyen et al. 2021
Environmental pollution in Vietnam’s craft villages Nguyen, T.L. 2020
Agriculture WECRAFT: A Platform for Networking Rural Craftsmen in Co-Production of Artisanal Crafts Guerrieri, P.M., Comai, S.,https://www.scopus.com/authid/ 2021
detail.uri?origin=resultslist&authorId=35614277100&zone=
Challenges to sustainable growth of the micro-scale kuhila craft industry of India Majumdar, P., Banerjee, S. 2017
Environmental protection policies at craft villages in Hanoi in the context of sustainable development Nguyen et al. 2021
Upgradation of housing and amenities in rural areas Chadha, P.S. 2005
Economics Environmental pollution in Vietnam’s craft villages Nguyen, T.L. 2020
Agrarian tourism as a factor in the socio-economic development of rural areas Kolomyts et al. 2020
Integrated rural development: commitment and policy-frame. Patel, A.R. 1979
14
Does the Informal Sector in Kenya Have Financial Potential to Sustainably Prepay for Health Care? Implications Okungu, V.R., McIntyre, D. 2019
for Financing Universal Health Coverage in Low-Income Settings
Sustainability Challenges to sustainable growth of the micro-scale kuhila craft industry of India Majumdar, P., Banerjee, S. 2017
Crafting Sustainability? The Potential and Limits of Institutional Design in Managing Water Pollution from Mahanty, S., Dang, T.D. 2013
Vietnam’s Craft Villages
Sustainable and green design in villages of Rural Southwest China Pitts, A., Gao, Y. 2017
Assessing sustainable bamboo-based income generation using a value chain approach: Case study of nongboua Lee et al. 2021
village in Lao PDR
Demography Integrated rural development: commitment and policy-frame. Patel, A.R. 1979
Assessing health impacts of an environmental pan-African development project: A migration perspective Duboz et al. 2020
Malignant lymphomas. Epidemiological review of 150 cases Chillè et al. 1999
Rural environmental attitudes McBeth, M.K., Foster, R.H. 1994
Tourism Preservation of Malaysian handicraft to support tourism development Hassan et al. 2017
Rural handicraft production in mpumalanga, south africa: Organization, problems and support needs Rogerson, C.M., Sithole, P.M. 2001
Tourism in rural areas: A case study of opportunities in the South Coast of KwaZulu-Natal Mnguni, E.M., Mtapuri, O.,https://www.scopus.com/authid/ 2020
detail.uri?origin=resultslist&authorId=38861553600&zone=
Employment and local development in rural environment | [Emploi et développement local en milieu rural] Bandarra, N.J. 2000
Economic Geotourism and geoparks as novel strategies for socio-economic development in rural areas Farsani, N.T., Coelho, C., Costa, C. 2011
Development Globalization and weavers’ health in India-case study of Varanasi silk weavers Zehra, M. 2016
Art of Africa Sleigh, M. 2005
Heliyon 9 (2023) e13039

Integrated rural development: commitment and policy-frame. Patel, A.R. 1979
Education Upgradation of housing and amenities in rural areas Chadha, P.S. 2005
Educational farm as a new tourism product (The example of Podkarpackie province) Mitura, T., Buczek-Kowalik, M. 2016
The Effectiveness of Handicrafts on Anxiety Reduction among Hospitalised Children in Paediatric Ward of Ranamagar, B., Karki, S. 2021
Dhulikhel Hospital
Educating and training craft textile producers Perivoliotis, M.C. 2007
Source: Author’s own calculation, based on Microsoft Excel software

Fig. 9. Network map of keywords on crafts and local development.

Fig. 10. Network map of keywords of future lines of research in the study area.
The red cluster, consisting of 15 articles, is the largest of all and its keywords are found in 109 articles, which constitutes 10.55% of
the total. These publications mainly deal with crafts aspects in rural areas as a source of income for the local community.
The main contributions that have been extracted from this cluster are as follows:
In the first place, handicrafts can be a very important source of income for local communities and they can be motivated by the
development of ecoparks that promote handicrafts for ecotourism [10], by tourism in general, which in many cases leads to rural
development and improved economic conditions ([13,14,61,62]), or by population moving to rural areas to improve their quality of
15
Fig. 11. Future research lines.
life, as it is the case of small entrepreneurs seeking for quick profits in a rural niche [63]. In some cases, factors that affect the trade of
craft products are analyzed ([64,65]).
On the other hand, tourism gives rise to numerous forms of crafts, such as those made from geological elements [10], craft products
derived from other natural resources of the place [13], gastronomy as a cultural asset [14], wood crafts [62] or grass weaving ([61,
62]).
Sustainability is another of the key concepts of this cluster, and it is one of the goals of the development of geoparks [10]. In some
cases, regulation through policies that act in favor of sustainability is necessary when the trade of a resource used for crafts tends to
deplete it, as in the case of various types of bark or wood ([61,66]) or non-timber forest products ([67,68]).
In the articles analyzed, the process of modernization of rural areas is also present [69]. However, seen from a negative point of
view, one could say that “modernization can increase the insecurity of livelihoods” [62]. However, there are modern tools, such as
mobile money, that have provided an advantage in trade for those local producers who have implemented them [65].
Employment promotion is another objective of ecotourism in geoparks [10], although in the crafts sector it is sometimes observed
that recruitment of staff is often low [70] and that artisans seek job satisfaction not only in financial gain but also in doing their job well
and having satisfied customers. The employment factor and economic benefit, or the search for a natural place to live, are variables
that can be closely linked to migration to rural areas [10,70].
4.2.5.2. Cluster 2: influence of crafts in rural areas. The second cluster is the green cluster, consisting of 13 items, found in a total of 98
research articles, and mainly deals with the changes that crafts or applications of new craft products or processes can bring about in
rural areas, mainly at the economic and demographic levels. The main contributions are detailed below.
Many studies address the impact on the economy of the development of certain types of activities typical of the rural world, such as
agriculture or, more conveniently, crafts. The revitalization of rural areas thanks to crafts can be seen [71]; o the positive effect of
“indigenised” or indigenous handicrafts to give cultural value to the product and encourage the active participation of the local
population [72], as well as the possibilities for economic development through non-timber products, which can lead to the creation of
enterprises [73]. The improvement of artisanal processes in rural areas can also lead to an important improvement in economic,
technical, and environmental terms [74]. Energy requirements of artisans in rural areas is analized by other studies [75] and try to
improve living conditions by finding solutions to the problem of energy shortages [76].
Likewise, the improvement or deterioration of the economy can affect the number, specialisation and skill of artisans [77] and can
lead to a sudden change of profession due to the development of a free port, which leads artisans to move on to other professions such
as construction or transportation [78].
Regarding demographic changes, numerous reasons explain the increase of artisans and other occupations in rural areas, such as
seeking isolation and nature in the countryside [62]. The timeframe is also important, since at the beginning of the 20th century the
increase in population created employment opportunities for artisans [79], while at the end of the century the “rural exodus” had
become a well-known phenomenon. However, there are cases of neo-rural phenomena, where a slight tendency to return to the rural
16
sphere is observed in particular cases, particularly among artisans and smallholder farmers [80].
4.2.5.3. Cluster 3: poverty in the rural world. The blue cluster is comprised of 8 items, which can be found in 82 search articles (7.9% of
the total). It fundamentally deals with the aspect of poverty in the rural world. The main contributions are detailed below. Artisanal
goods may be perceived by tourists as having a low value, as occurs in the Central American tropical forest, which means that their sale
does not allow for an improvement in the quality of life of local residents and encourages them to deforest, as this provides more
income than the sale of handicrafts and therefore leads to the loss of the richness of the forest [81].
Likewise, the population of rural areas specializing in handicrafts can be directly related to poverty in many areas, especially in the
poorest parts of society. Some studies investigate the quality of the diet in these rural areas [82] and others that find an association
between suffering from certain chronic diseases and work as artisans, temporary workers, housewives or small shopkeepers [83]. In
the case of young children, there may also be a higher probability of malnutrition for children of artisans, peasants or small business
women [84]. Some studies also analyze child labour in the artisanal sectors of certain regions [85].
While it is true that crafts may involve much more inefficient techniques than modern industry [85], in some cases, these crafts are
fundamental for people’s livelihood, as in South Africa [86]. In other cases, the economic progress of a specific place leads to a change
of trade, as people move from crafts to other jobs [78].
Lastly, life in a rural area for artists and artisans is not always viable and this may depend, among other factors, on access to the
market. This was the case in the study by Bunting and Mitchell, who identified the variables access to the market, landscape
attractiveness and economic exigency as those affecting the location of artists and artisans in Canada [87].
5. Conclusions
Considering the research questions, this section develops the conclusions made and the implications of the findings.
As for the direction that research related to crafts and rural development has taken since the scientific community began to take an
interest in this subject, it should be noted that starting from lines of research based on the analysis of the demographic and economic
factors of development, research has progressed over the years towards more novel subjects such as sustainability, tourism devel
opment or care for the environment, as well as the prospects for employment and its improvement through the development of crafts.
Publications in this area address various aspects. Some deal with the impact of crafts and other activities in rural areas; the
importance of small businesses for economic development, handicrafts, among others, or the analysis of the effects of handicrafts on
the economy; others consider the factors that improve the development of craft activities in the rural world, such as attitude or
technology. Lastly, other studies review the effects of goods such as the tropical forest, the native species of a region or gastronomic
goods and their influence on the rural world and the artisan sector.
In addition, it is worth noting the high number of subject areas present in Fig. 4, as well as the weight of each of them. This
demonstrates a high degree of multidisciplinarity in this area of knowledge.
Esteeming the number of citations of their articles, Rogerson, C.M., Braedt, O., Braunegg, G., Eyferth, J. and Dang, T.D., are the
most important authors, among others. India, America, South Africa, Germany, Austria, Australia and Romania are the countries of
origin of the ten authors with the most publications on the subject. Likewise, the countries with the highest number of citations are the
United States, the United Kingdom, India, Canada and South Africa. Furthermore, the institutions with the most cited publications are
the London School of Economics and Political Science (United Kingdom), the University of California (United States), the University of
the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg (South Africa) and The University of British Columbia (Canada).
As for international cooperation, in the analysis of collaboration between the most relevant authors and institutions, little
collaboration between them can be observed. However, some international collaboration is observed if we consider the set of pub
lications from each country. The top countries for collaborating internationally on other countries’ publications are the United States,
Canada, China, Australia, the United Kingdom and India, while the top countries for collaborating with other countries on their own
publications are the United Kingdom, South Africa, Canada, China, Italy and France. The field of research on crafts as a key factor in
rural development has evolved from a perspective of economic and demographic factors towards other lines, such as sustainable
development (so much in vogue nowadays), poverty alleviation, economic development of certain regions, impact on the environment
and sustainability; in many cases directly linked to the development of tourism, which has developed exponentially in the last decades.
These are recurrent themes within the main publications in both the most prolific countries and the most cited publications, as can
be seen in the analysis of the most important publications in each country, as well as in the most important keywords on this topic.
Rural development is encouraged by governments around the world, with large investments that indicate their interest. Crafts have
been a cleaner, more sustainable and environmentally friendly activity than industrial activities and constitute a source of possibilities
and employment [17], linked above all to tourism [37]. In addition, crafts can achieve the best possible return on labour without
harming the environment [19].
Studies related to crafts as a factor in the development of rural areas have grown significantly, prompted by the European Con
ference on Rural Development in 1996 [51] and by the economic crisis that led to the search for new sources of subsistence, in addition
to the growing interest in more sustainable economic activities [22]. International collaboration in this field of study is generally
scarce.
The most popular lines of research on this subject were, on the one hand, crafts as a source of income for local communities,
especially linked to tourism, job creation and sustainability, and, on the other hand, the demographic and economic effects that the
new products and craft processes have on the rural environment, followed by the alleviation of poverty in the rural world. This
17
fundamentally highlights the concept of handicrafts as a source of subsistence for poor rural regions.
Crafts as an alternative or source of economic development and employment are part of rural development strategies. Some crafts
are part of the development strategy of a region [88]. In sub-Saharan Africa, crafts and mining are a fundamental basis of the economy
in rural areas ([15,89]). Specifically, artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) is the most important non-agricultural activity in rural
areas of sub-Saharan Africa [90]. Moreover, the Community-Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM) programme in Botswana
aims to achieve conservation and rural development and has generated new craft activities that provide an economic livelihood for the
locals [13]. In the design of these strategies, crafts can play a relevant role in achieving goals. Thus, the Chilean government has
developed policies that grant rights to artisanal fishermen and their goal is to improve the sustainability of the region [91]. The
keyword analysis confirms this observation, as the terms “Developing country”, “Employment” or “Sustainable development”, as well
as “Demography” or “Tourism” are among the 10 most frequently used keywords in this study. The most cited publications deal with
topics such as improving access to marketing for small rural businesses, crafts as an important source of employment, solving the
problems of rural exodus and the loss of craftsmen in order to preserve cultural heritage, or promoting craft activities vis-à-vis tourism,
among others. This is because there are cases where crafts are a factor of interest and motivation for tourism, thus contributing to the
development of rural areas.
Thus, ecotourism fosters the appearance of handicraft markets, and tourists show interest in touring the villages and visiting the
handicraft markets, finding that many were willing to pay much higher rates than those proposed by the communities [92]. Another
example of this is artisanal recipes. In many cases, the typical foods of numerous rural regions have been considered to have a clear
impact on rural development [93].
Concerning the popularity of handicrafts in the rural world, it has been discovered that the relationship between rural development
and handicrafts is addressed in rural development projects in various parts of the world. An example of this is the Community-Based
Natural Resource Management (CBNRM) programme in Botswana [13] or rural development in West Wales, which analyses four
sectors, one of them crafts [94]. Other studies analyze the contribution to regional development of craft beer companies in rural areas,
specifically in 16 rural areas of Australia [38]. In Europe, LEADER actions are used to implement rural development strategies within
the framework of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). These projects are based on the fact that crafts and agriculture “represent a
sustainable example of human integration with nature” [29]. Thereby, in some cases and after decades of decline, crafts have expe
rienced exponential growth in this century, due to social changes such as the interest in reducing gaps between rural and urban
populations, or the taste for living in a rural area. This has contributed to the generation of social and symbolic capital, and financial, in
those rural regions where crafts have been promoted [38], creating new connections between the rural world and the cities, with the
aim of revitalizing rural businesses and communities through culture, art and crafts ([11,12]).
6. Limitations
To conclude, it is important to bear in mind that this research has certain limitations that should be considered for future research.
Firstly, the database used for the study was Scopus and we consider that it would be necessary to use other repositories, such as Google
Scholar, or Web of Science. Secondly, in order to facilitate comparison and understanding for certain analyses, only research articles
have been taken into consideration. However, a greater diversity of documents could have been included in the study to complement
the analyses carried out. In the third place, the VosViewer tool used for data visualization and grouping might yield different results if
compared to other software tools. Finally, the bibliometric analysis methodology does not consider that citations require a specific
time to be analyzed, so content analysis could complement the study to assess the quality of the research.
7. Future lines of research
Regarding future lines of research, and based on the results obtained by bibliometric analysis, it can be considered that, given the
trend of the evolution of the previously mentioned keywords, it would be interesting to establish correlations between the concept of
craftsmanship and the concepts of sustainable development, poverty alleviation, economic development of rural areas and care for the
environment, as well as relating the subject of Crafts and SDGs, Crafts and Circular Economy. (See Fig. 11).
It would also be interesting to determine both the type and characteristics of entrepreneurship taking place in this sector and what
products and production techniques are being used.
Another important line would be to determine how new technologies such as 3D printing, augmented virtual reality and new
materials are relevant to the design and production of new craft-related products and services.
Likewise, as stated in this study’s introduction, we should underscore the importance that these concepts have acquired in recent
years and the interest on the part of governments in encouraging certain actions to achieve development goals in the future, partic
ularly as solutions for what is called ‘emptied Spain’ (depopulated rural areas).
This type of research can provide relevant information to ensure those responsible for the design of public policies and the owners
of handicraft companies can formulate strategies that would allow this productive sector to be sustainable in the coming years and
adapt to the new realities demanded by the consumer and craft markets.
Author contribution statement
All authors listed have significantly contributed to the development and the writing of this article.
18
Funding statement
This study was funded by RRREMAKER. RRREMAKER MSC-RISE-H2020 project has received funding from the European Union’s
Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie, proposal number: 101008060.
Data availability statement
Data will be made available on request.
Declaration of interest’s statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
[1] European Union, Apoyo de la PAC al desarrollo rural, 2022. Disponible en, https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/key-policies/common-
agricultural-policy/rural-development_es#:~:text=Apoyo%20de%20la%20PAC%20al%20desarrollo%20rural,-La%20contribuci%C3%B3n%20deytext=El%
20presupuesto%20del%20Feader%20para,la%20pandemia%20de%20COVID%2D19.Consultadoel26/02/2022.
[2] European Commission, EU rural areas in numbers, 2018. Available in, https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/new-push-european-
democracy/long-term-vision-rural-areas/eu-rural-areas-numbers_en. (Accessed 18 October 2022).
[3] World Bank, Población rural (% de la población total), 2020. Disponible en, https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicator/SP.RUR.TOTL.ZS.
[4] Copus, et al., ESCAPE. European shrinking rural areas: challenges, actions and perspectives for territorial governance: applied research, 2020. Disponible en,
https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/ESPON%20ESCAPE%20Main%20Final%20Report.pdf. Consultado el 27/02/2020.
[5] C. Kay, Development strategies and rural development: exploring synergies, eradicating poverty, J. Peasant Stud. 36 (1) (2009) 103–137.
[6] European CommisionCommission, Report on the Deployment of Cohesion Policy Instruments by Regions to Address Demographic Change, European Parliament
Committee on Regional Development, 2017. Disponible en, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0329_EN.htm Consultado el 27/02/
2022.
[7] R.A. Sanchis, V.C. Serrano, P.R. Köster, La cultura como factor de innovación socio-económica en el medio rural: el caso del clúster de artesanía artística de La
Città Europea dei Mestieri d’Arte (CITEMA). Ager: revista de estudios sobre despoblación y desarrollo rural, J. Depop. Rural Develop. Stud. (20) (2016) 73–103.
[8] European Union, Red europea de Artesanos rurales, 2022. Disponible en, https://www.adelquivir.org/proyectos/artesania/red-europea-de-artesanos-rurales/.
Consultado el 26/02/2022.
[9] G. Richards, Making places through creative tourism?, in: Cultural Sustainability, Tourism and Development Routledge, 2021, pp. 36–48.
[10] N.T. Farsani, C. Coelho, C. Costa, Geotourism and geoparks as novel strategies for socio-economic development in rural areas, Int. J. Tourism Res. 13 (1) (2011)
68–81.
[11] L. Morais, Craft, rural revitalization, and transnationalism: preliminary findings concerning three case studies in shimane, shizuoka, and tochigi, Japan, in: The
Twelfth International Convention of Asia Scholars (ICAS 12), Amsterdam University Press, 2022, pp. 473–483, 1.
[12] T. Huang, E. Anderson, Designing for revitalization of communities through new business models for traditional arts and crafts, Art Des. Rev. 4 (2019) 225–236.
[13] J.E. Mbaiwa, Changes on traditional livelihood activities and lifestyles caused by tourism development in the Okavango Delta, Botswana, Tourism Manag. 32 (5)
(2011) 1050–1060.
[14] J. Bessiere, L. Tibere, Traditional food and tourism: French tourist experience and food heritage in rural spaces, J. Sci. Food Agric. 93 (14) (2013) 3420–3425.
[15] S.M. Banchirigah, G. Hilson, De-agrarianization, re-agrarianization and local economic development: Re-orientating livelihoods in African artisanal mining
communities, Pol. Sci. 43 (2) (2010) 157–180.
[16] N. Fuller-Love, P. Midmore, D. Thomas, A. Henley, Entrepreneurship and rural economic development: a scenario analysis approach, Int. J. Entrepren. Behav.
Res. 12 (5) (2006) 289–305.
[17] P. Sánchez-Zamora, R. Gallardo-Cobos, F. Ceña-Delgado, Rural areas face the economic crisis: analyzing the determinants of successful territorial dynamics,
J. Rural Stud. 35 (2014) 11–25.
[18] L. Zhang, N. Eichmann-Kalwara, Mapping the scholarly literature found in Scopus on “research data management”: a bibliometric and data visualization
approach, J. Librarian. Scholar. Commun. 7 (1) (2019) 1–19.
[19] C. Willis, Fair Trade: what’s it all about?, in: Fair Trade Advocacy Office (2006). Business Unusual: Successes and Challenges of Fair Trade. Brussels, Belgium:
Fairtrade Labelling Organizations (FLO) International Fair Trade, 2006.
[20] I.B. Schmidt, T. Ticktin, When lessons from population models and local ecological knowledge coincide–Effects of flower stalk harvesting in the Brazilian
savanna, Biol. Conserv. 152 (2012) 187–195.
[21] A. Kallmuenzer, S. Kraus, M. Peters, J. Steiner, C.F. Cheng, Entrepreneurship in tourism firms: a mixed-methods analysis of performance driver configurations,
Tourism Manag. 74 (2019) 319–330.
[22] G. Sperandio, T. Amoriello, K. Carbone, M. Fedrizzi, A. Monteleone, S. Tarangioli, M. Pagano, Increasing the value of spent grain from craft microbreweries for
energy purposes, Chem. Eng. Trans. 58 (2017) 487–492.
[23] D. Atalay Onur, Integrating circular economy, collaboration and craft practice in fashion design education in developing countries: a case from Turkey, Fash.
Pract. 12 (1) (2020) 55–77.
[24] W. Handayani, B. Widianarko, A.R. Pratiwi, Toward water friendliness in batik production: addressing the key factors on water use for batik production in
Jarum village, Klaten Regency, Indonesia, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. (2021) 1–12.
[25] P. Jain, C. Gupta, A sustainable journey of handmade paper from past to present: a review, Problem. Ekor. 16 (2) (2021) 234–244.
[26] D. Keller-Aviram, Traceability, sustainability, and circularity as mechanism in the luxury jewelry industry creating emotional added value, Sustain. Lux. Jewel.
(2021) 87–115.
[27] F. Brun, V. Dubois, C. Boutin, L’emploi du broyat de bois, une solution durable pour traiter les eaux ménagères? Tech. Sci. Methodes (TSM) (2021) 12–16.
[28] MacEachren, Function and aesthetics: defining craftsmanship, J. Exp. Educ. 26 (3) (2004) 138–151.
[29] F. Gobattoni, R. Pelorosso, A. Leone, M.N. Ripa, Sustainable rural development: the role of traditional activities in Central Italy, Land Use Pol. 48 (2015)
412–427.
[30] Karakul, The effects of tourism on traditional craftsmanship for the sustainable development of historic environments, Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. 8 (4) (2019) 380,
380.
[31] Y.M. Bayoumi, S. Sheta, M. Kalifa, Emphasizing the role of craftsmanship in urban planning interventions to promote tourism-case study Zaanse schans, The
Netherlands. MEJ, Mans. Eng. J. 41 (2) (2020) 15–23.
[32] X. Zhan, S. Walker, R. Hernandez-Pardo, M. Evans, Craft and sustainability: potential for design intervention in crafts in the yangtze river delta, China, Des. J. 20
(1) (2017) 2919–2934.
[33] R.A. Cabraal, D.F. Barnes, S.G. Agarwal, Productive uses of energy for rural development, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 30 (2005) 117–144.
[34] Z. Jinqiu, H. Xiaoming, I. Banerjee, The diffusion of the Internet and rural development, Convergence 12 (3) (2006) 293–305.
19
[35] C. Ashley, S. Maxwell, Rethinking rural development, Dev. Pol. Rev. 9 (4) (2001) 395–425.
[36] T. Basu, S. Banerjee, Impact of internet on rural development in India: a case study, Amity J. Media Commun. Stud. 1 (2) (2011) 12–17.
[37] J.C. Richards, Communicative Language Teaching Today, SEAMEO Regional Language Centre, 2005.
[38] N. Argent, Heading down to the local? Australian rural development and the evolving spatiality of the craft beer sector, J. Rural Stud. 61 (2018) 84–99.
[39] B. Koós, K. Kovács, G. Tagai, A. Uzzoli, M.M. Váradi, ESCAPE. European Shrinking Rural Areas: Challenges, Actions and Perspectives for Territorial Governance,
Applied Research, 2020.
[40] CIDA, There are more than 10 design strategies to alleviate poverty, 2019. Disponible en, http://www.sohu.com/a/313969183_283830.
[41] R. Urata, S. Sasaki, TraEx: traditional arts & crafts event recommendation system with lifetime experience for regional revitalization, in: 2021 International
Electronics Symposium (IES), IEEE, 2021, pp. 318–322.
[42] K. Yair, Craft and Rural Development, Crafts Council, London, 2011.
[43] R.N. Broadus, Toward a definition of “bibliometrics, Scientometrics 12 (5–6) (1987) 373–379.
[44] N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, W.M. Lim, How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines, J. Bus. Res. 133 (2021)
285–296.
[45] S. Kumar, W.M. Lim, N. Pandey, J. Christopher Westland, 20 years of electronic commerce research, Electron. Commer. Res. 21 (1) (2021) 1–40.
[46] C. Cicea, T. Lefteris, C. Marinescu, S.C. Popa, C.F. Albu, Applying text mining technique on innovation-development relationship: a joint research agenda, Econ.
Comput. Econ. Cybern. Stud. Res. 55 (1) (2021) 5–21.
[47] J. Baas, M. Schotten, A. Plume, G. Côté, R. Karimi, Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science
studies, Quant. Sci. Stud. 1 (1) (2020) 377–386.
[48] J. Paul, W.M. Lim, A. O’Cass, A.W. Hao, S. Bresciani, Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR), Int. J. Consum. Stud.
45 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.1269.
[49] F.D.A. Nascimento, F.M. Rodrigues, Growth trend of scientific literature on genetic improvement through the database Scopus, Scientometrics 105 (2) (2015)
805–816.
[50] N.J. Van Eck, L. Waltman, Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer, ISSI Newslett. 7 (3) (2011) 50–54.
[51] A.T. Becerra, B.X. Lastra, Evolución del desarrollo rural en Europa y en España. Las áreas rurales de metodología Leader, Rev. Electrón. Medioamb. 4 (2007)
35–62.
[52] B.B. Bock, Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation; a turn towards nexogenous development and rural reconnection, Sociol. Rural. 56 (4) (2016)
552–573.
[53] E. Giannakis, A. Bruggeman, Economic crisis and regional resilience: evidence from Greece, Pap. Reg. Sci. 96 (3) (2017) 451–476.
[54] K.D. Snell, Annals of the Labouring Poor: Social Change and Agrarian England, Cambridge University Press, 1987, pp. 1660–1900. No. 2.
[55] S.R. Epstein, Craft guilds, apprenticeship, and technological change in preindustrial Europe, J. Econ. Hist. 58 (3) (1998) 684–713.
[56] S. Bhagavatula, T. Elfring, A. Van Tilburg, G.G. Van De Bunt, How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in
India’s handloom industry, J. Bus. Ventur. 25 (3) (2010) 245–260.
[57] P.T. Long, R.R. Perdue, The economic impact of rural festivals and special events: assessing the spatial distribution of expenditures, J. Trav. Res. 28 (4) (1990)
10–14.
[58] S. Cecchini, C. Scott, Can information and communications technology applications contribute to poverty reduction? Lessons from rural India, Inf. Technol. Dev.
10 (2) (2003) 73–84.
[59] G.C. Gandini, E. Villa, Analysis of the cultural value of local livestock breeds: a methodology, J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 120 (1) (2003) 1–11.
[60] H. Paxson, Locating value in artisan cheese: reverse engineering terroir for new-world landscapes, Am. Anthropol. 112 (3) (2010) 444–457.
[61] O. Braedt, W. Standa-Gunda, Woodcraft markets in Zimbabwe, Int. Tree Crops J. 10 (4) (2000) 367–384.
[62] C.M. Rogerson, P.M. Sithole, Rural handicraft production in Mpumalanga, South Africa: organization, problems and support needs, S. Afr. Geogr. J. 83 (2)
(2001) 149–158.
[63] M.K. McBeth, R.H. Foster, Rural environmental attitudes, Environ. Manag. 18 (3) (1994) 401–411.
[64] C.L. Delgado, J. Hopkins, V.A. Kelly, Agricultural Growth Linkages in Sub-saharan Africa, vol. 107, International Food Policy Research Institute, 1998,
pp. 1–139.
[65] H. Sekabira, M. Qaim, Mobile money, agricultural marketing, and off-farm income in Uganda, Agric. Econ. 48 (5) (2017) 597–611.
[66] D.B. Dovie, Rural economy and livelihoods from the non-timber forest products trade. Compromising sustainability in southern Africa?. The International,
J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 10 (3) (2003) 247–262.
[67] S.M. Greene, A.L. Hammett, S. Kant, Non-timber forest products marketing systems and market players in Southwest Virginia: crafts, medicinal and herbal, and
specialty wood products, J. Sustain. For. 11 (3) (2000) 19–39.
[68] E.M. Nakazono, E.M. Bruna, R.C. Mesquita, Experimental harvesting of the non-timber forest product Ischnosiphon polyphyllus in central Amazonia, For. Ecol.
Manag. 190 (2–3) (2004) 219–225.
[69] Y. Kimura, Knowledge diffusion and modernization of rural industrial clusters: a paper-manufacturing village in northern Vietnam, World Dev. 39 (12) (2011)
2105–2118.
[70] H. Reijonen, R. Komppula, Perception of success and its effect on small firm performance, J. Small Bus. Enterprise Dev. 14 (4) (2007) 689–701, https://doi.org/
10.1108/14626000710832776.
[71] M.A. Max-Neef, From the outside Looking in: Experiences in ‘barefoot Economics’, Zed Books, 1992.
[72] T.V. Singh, The Kulu Valley: Impact of Tourism Development in the Mountain Areas. The Kulu Valley: Impact of Tourism Development in the Mountain Areas,
Himalayan Books, New Delhi, 1989.
[73] D. Vuletić, S. Krajter, M. Mrazek, A. Ćorić, Non wood forest products and services–are we using them enough? Šumarski list 133 (3–4) (2009) 175–184.
[74] T.H. Le, V.T. Tran, Q.V. Le, T.P.T. Nguyen, H. Schnitzer, G. Braunegg, An integrated ecosystem incorporating renewable energy leading to pollution reduction
for sustainable development of craft villages in rural area: a case study at sedge mats village in Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Energy, Sustain. Soc. 6 (No. 1) (2016)
1–12.
[75] N.G. Johnson, K.M. Bryden, Energy supply and use in a rural West African village, Energy 43 (1) (2012) 283–292.
[76] G. Dendukuri, J.P. Mittal, Household energy needs of a village in the Rayalaseema area of Andhra Pradesh, India, Energy Convers. Manag. 34 (12) (1993)
1273–1286.
[77] J. Schneider, P. Schneider, Demographic transitions in a Sicilian rural town, J. Fam. Hist. 9 (3) (1984) 245–272.
[78] J. Monk, C.S. Alexander, Free port fallout: gender, employment, and migration on Margarita Island, Ann. Tourism Res. 13 (3) (1986) 393–413.
[79] L. Brydon, Ghanaian Women in the Migration Process. Gender and Migration in Developing Countries, 1992, pp. 91–108.
[80] M. Chevalier, Neo-rural phenomena, L’Espace Géograph. 1 (1) (1993) 175–191.
[81] Godoy, et al., Valuation of consumption and sale of forest goods from a Central American rain forest, Nature 406 (6791) (2000) 62–63.
[82] S. Ajani, An assessment of dietary diversity in six Nigerian states, Afr. J. Biomed. Res. 13 (3) (2010) 161–167.
[83] H. Van Minh, D.L. Huong, K.B. Giang, Self-reported chronic diseases and associated sociodemographic status and lifestyle risk factors among rural Vietnamese
adults, Scand. J. Publ. Health 36 (6) (2008) 629–634.
[84] D. Yu, et al., Status of malnutrition and its influencing factors in children under 5 years of age in poor areas of China in 2009. Wei sheng yan jiu, J. Hyg. Res. 40
(6) (2011) 714–718.
[85] A. Saith, From village artisans to industrial clusters: agendas and policy gaps in Indian rural industrialization, J. Agrar. Change 1 (1) (2001) 81–123.
[86] T. Kepe, Use, control and value of craft material—Cyperus textilis: perspectives from a Mpondo village, South Africa, S. Afr. Geogr. J. 85 (2) (2003) 152–157.
[87] T.E. Bunting, C.J. Mitchell, Artists in rural locales: market access, landscape appeal and economic exigency, Can. Geogr. 45 (2) (2001) 268–284.
[88] J.J. Hinton, M.M. Veiga, A.T.C. Veiga, Clean artisanal gold mining: a utopian approach? J. Clean. Prod. 11 (2) (2003) 99–115.
20
[89] G. Hilson, Small-scale mining, poverty and economic development in sub-Saharan Africa: an overview, Resour. Pol. 34 (1–2) (2009) 1–5.
[90] G. Hilson, Farming, small-scale mining and rural livelihoods in Sub-Saharan Africa: a critical overview, Extr. Ind. Soc. 3 (No. 2) (2016) 547–563.
[91] S. Gelcich, G.A. Edwards-Jones, T.H. RE, M.J. Kaiser, Importance of attitudinal differences among artisanal Fishers toward co-management and conservation of
marine resources, Conserv. Biol. 19 (3) (2005) 865–875.
[92] P. Chaminuka, R.A. Groeneveld, A.O. Selomane, E.C. Van Ierland, Tourist preferences for ecotourism in rural communities adjacent to Kruger National Park: a
choice experiment approach, Tourism Manag. 33 (1) (2012) 168–176.
[93] A. Tregear, From Stilton to Vimto: using food history to re-think typical products in rural development, Sociol. Urales 43 (2) (2003) 91–107.
[94] M. Kneafsey, B. Ilbery, T. Jenkins, Exploring the dimensions of culture economies in rural West Wales, Sociol. Rural. 41 (3) (2001) 296–310.
21

Crafts For Development

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Crafts For Development

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Crafts For Development

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Heliyon 9 (2023) e13039

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Crafts as a key factor in local development: Bibliometric analysis

2.2. Rural development

2.3. Crafts and rural development

Fig. 2. Evolution and trend of scientific production. Period 1954–2021.

4.1. Evolution of scientific production

Fig. 3. Annual evolution of scientific production. Period 1996–2021.

1996 9 10 9 9 51 8 5.67 1.11

Source: Author’s own calculation, based on Microsoft Excel software.

4.2. Analysis of scientific production

Fig. 4. Scientific production by thematic areas.

4.2.1. Distribution of publications by thematic area

4.2.2. Most cited articles

4.2.3. Author productivity

Source: Author’s own calculation, based on Microsoft Excel software.

8.67 average citations, respectively.

4.2.4. Productivity of journals, institutions and countries

Fig. 5. Map of international cooperation.

Source: Author’s own calculation, based on Microsoft Excel software.

University of KwaZulu-Natal South Africa 10 34 3.4 4 10.0 4.0 3.3

Fig. 6. Map of international collaboration between institutions.

Fig. 7. Map of international cooperation networks by country.

Source: Author’s own calculation, based on Microsoft Excel software.

D. Fernández Bellver et al.

Heliyon 9 (2023) e13039

Source: Author’s own calculation, based on Microsoft Excel software

4.2.5. Keyword analysis

Fig. 8. Ten more mentioned keywords

D. Fernández Bellver et al.

Developing Marketing rural products in India Kashyap, P. 1991

Heliyon 9 (2023) e13039

Source: Author’s own calculation, based on Microsoft Excel software

Fig. 9. Network map of keywords on crafts and local development.

Fig. 11. Future research lines.

7. Future lines of research

Author contribution statement

Data availability statement

Data will be made available on request.

Declaration of interest’s statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

You might also like