Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Best Paper Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Courtney Baguinat
    This rubric evaluates draft papers on several criteria in four main areas: 1) Content, 2) Focus, 3) Language, and 4) Scholarship. Papers are scored on a scale from 0 to 3 in each sub-criteria, with 3 being "Excellent" and 0 being "Needs Improvement". The rubric provides descriptors to guide scoring papers in areas such as originality, research approach, results, order, conclusions, clarity, and building on prior work.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Best Paper Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Courtney Baguinat
    7 views1 page
    This rubric evaluates draft papers on several criteria in four main areas: 1) Content, 2) Focus, 3) Language, and 4) Scholarship. Papers are scored on a scale from 0 to 3 in each sub-criteria, with 3 being "Excellent" and 0 being "Needs Improvement". The rubric provides descriptors to guide scoring papers in areas such as originality, research approach, results, order, conclusions, clarity, and building on prior work.

    Original Title

    best-paper-rubric (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This rubric evaluates draft papers on several criteria in four main areas: 1) Content, 2) Focus, 3) Language, and 4) Scholarship. Papers are scored on a scale from 0 to 3 in each sub-criteria, with 3 being "Excellent" and 0 being "Needs Improvement". The rubric provides descriptors to guide scoring papers in areas such as originality, research approach, results, order, conclusions, clarity, and building on prior work.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    7 views1 page

    Best Paper Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Courtney Baguinat
    This rubric evaluates draft papers on several criteria in four main areas: 1) Content, 2) Focus, 3) Language, and 4) Scholarship. Papers are scored on a scale from 0 to 3 in each sub-criteria, with 3 being "Excellent" and 0 being "Needs Improvement". The rubric provides descriptors to guide scoring papers in areas such as originality, research approach, results, order, conclusions, clarity, and building on prior work.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Draft Paper Evaluation Rubric

    3-Excellent 2- Good 1 - Satisfactory 0 – Needs Improvement

    Content contains
    Originality Content contains
    Content contains highly Content contains some moderately original
    minimal original
    original treatment of, or original treatment of, or treatment of, or new
    treatment of, or new
    new perspective on, the new perspective on, the perspective on, the
    perspective on, the
    topic. topic topic.
    topic.
    The research approach
    The research approach
    is novel and/or The research approach
    Research Approach

    is basic, but still


    sophisticated and is advanced and
    appropriate for the
    appropriate for the appropriate for the
    purpose of the paper, The research approach
    purpose of the paper, purpose of the paper,
    and is consistent with is inadequate and/or not
    and is consistent with and is consistent with
    the perspective appropriate for the
    the perspective the perspective
    (quantitative, purpose of the paper.
    (quantitative, (quantitative,
    CONTENT

    qualitative, mixed, or
    qualitative, mixed, or qualitative, mixed, or
    more specific).
    more specific). more specific)

    Data collection and


    Data collection and Data collection and assessment results are
    Results

    assessment results are assessment results are somewhat clear and Data collection and
    very clear and logical, clear and logical, logical, moderately assessment results
    strongly supporting the supporting the goals of supporting the goals of need improvement.
    goals of the paper. the paper. the paper.
    Scholarship

    Content reviews and Content reviews and Content reviews and


    Content does not
    builds on appropriate builds on appropriate builds on appropriate
    review and build on
    prior work to a prior work to a prior work to a limited
    appropriate prior work.
    significant extent. moderate extent. extent.

    The paper makes a


    The paper makes a The paper makes a
    Relevance

    highly significant The paper makes a


    significant contribution moderate contribution
    contribution to the field minimal contribution to
    to the field of to the field of
    of engineering the field of engineering
    engineering education. engineering education.
    education. education.

    The goals are strongly The goals are The goals are not fully
    Goals

    The goals are not


    developed and explicitly developed and explicitly developed and/or
    developed and/or stated
    stated stated. stated.

    The order in which The order in which There is little apparent


    ideas are presented is ideas are presented is The order in which structure to the flow of
    FOCUS
    Order

    explicitly and reasonably clear, ideas are presented is ideas, causing


    consistently clear, logical and effective, occasionally confusing. confusion.
    logical and effective. but could be improved
    Conclusions

    The conclusions are The conclusions are


    The conclusions are
    very well formulated The conclusions are moderately effective
    minimally effective and
    and are strongly well formulated and are and are only partially
    do not appear to be
    supported by the data. supported by the data. supported by the data.
    supported by the data

    The paper is difficult to


    The paper is clear, Multiple sections of the
    The paper is mostly read/understand due to
    concise, and paper are difficult to
    understandable, with sentence/paragraph
    Style

    consistent. It is easily read/understand. The


    occasional structure, word choices,
    LANGUAGE

    understandable and a paper could be better


    inconsistencies that lack of explanations,
    pleasure to read. structured or more
    could be improved etc.
    clearly explained

    Minor grammar or
    Some grammar or
    Mechanics

    The writing is near spelling errors are Pervasive grammar or


    spelling errors are
    perfect with little to no present, but do not spelling errors distort
    significant and detract
    grammar or spelling detract from the meaning and make
    from the content. Paper
    errors. content. Content is reading difficult.
    requires further editing.
    clear

    Each row is to be scored independently from zero to three points.

    You might also like