Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 222 views

    Mscfe 622 Continuous-Time Stochastic Processes - Course Syllabus

    Uploaded by

    Abdullah Abdullah

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Mscfe 622 Continuous-Time Stochastic Processes - Course Syllabus

    Uploaded by

    Abdullah Abdullah
    222 views1 page

    Original Title

    MScFE_622_CTSP_Group_Work_Project_Grading_Rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    222 views1 page

    Mscfe 622 Continuous-Time Stochastic Processes - Course Syllabus

    Uploaded by

    Abdullah Abdullah

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    MScFE 622 Continuous-time Stochastic Processes – Course Syllabus

    Percentage Points Points


    Assessment Excellent Proficient Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
    of Overall Possible Possible
    Criteria
    85-100% 70-84% 65-69% 0-64% Grade (Drafts 1 - 2) (Draft 3)

    The group presents a clear,


    The group produces a strong The group has produced an
    coherent and noteworthy paper The group has produced a weak
    paper that demonstrates that they adequate paper, reflecting some
    that demonstrates full paper that needs considerable
    Knowledge understand the subject matter. knowledge of the subject matter.
    understanding of their subject revision. The paper lacks in
    of the They have answered most of the The paper has some content, and
    matter. They have answered most content, and not all the 30% 14 27
    Content questions applying critical some critical thinking has been
    of the questions applying critical questions have been answered.
    thinking. The group demonstrates applied to answer the questions.
    thinking. Their chosen evidence is Overall, the paper reflects a poor
    awareness of the literature they The group may struggle in relating
    thorough, relevant and clearly understanding of the topic.
    refer to. references to their argument.
    presented.

    The group has demonstrated The group has used some peer- The group has only used Internet
    strong skills in their selection and The group has referenced reliable reviewed resources however the resources (i.e., Wikipedia) or
    Research
    use of peer-reviewed resources to peer-reviewed resources to selected resources have only been similar non-academic resources 20% 9 18
    present original ideas in the support their argument. partially incorporated in their to support their argument.
    context of the selected references. argument. Referencing is scant.

    The group has demonstrated to be


    The group has demonstrated poor The group has not been able to
    The group has demonstrated to be able to analyze their argument and
    ability to analyze their argument analyze their argument. Their
    able to analyze their argument and draw logical conclusions for the
    and draw logical conclusions. analysis is vaguely connected to
    draw logical and valid conclusions most part. Their analysis may be
    Their analysis is weakly supported their research.
    based on their research. somewhat derivative and/or may
    Methods and by their research. If applicable: the code
    If applicable: the code lack deeper insight.
    Analysis If applicable; the code accompanying the paper is not 20% 9 18
    accompanying the paper is very If applicable: the code
    accompanying the paper is poorly sufficiently commented and it is
    well commented and easy to accompanying the paper is
    commented and is not easy to difficult to follow. The program
    follow. The executed program commented and is fairly easy to
    follow. The program provides does not provide the expected
    provides the expected results and follow. The executed program
    results however it does not meet results and does not meet the
    meets all the given specifications. provides acceptable results and
    most of the specifications. specifications.
    meets most of the specifications.

    The group has included the main The group has nominal
    Argument The group has structured an
    The group has structured a clear elements of an argument: introduction and conclusion, but
    and argument and included an
    and coherent argument, including introduction, body and this does not build to a coherent, 20% 9 18
    Conclusions introduction, a body, and a
    introduction, body, and conclusion. conclusion; however, they make a logical argument. The paper may
    conclusion.
    weak/unclear argument. be contradictory.

    The group has presented their The group has presented their
    Writing The group has presented their The group has presented their
    assignment in a clear and coherent assignment in a clear and coherent
    Components assignment adequately, with some assignment with poor formatting
    manner, with consistent manner, with sufficient formatting
    and consideration of formatting and and inadequate referencing. 10% 4 9
    formatting and clear referencing. and clear referencing. The work
    Formatting referencing. There are some There are several grammar
    The work is free of grammar errors may have a few grammar errors
    grammar errors and typos. errors and typos.
    and typos. and typos.
    Total 100% 45 90

    © 2019 - WorldQuant University – All rights reserved.


    11

    You might also like