Different Methods of Training
Different Methods of Training
Different Methods of Training
A Training method can be understood as an instrument or technique that a trainer employs for
delivering training content or for facilitating the learning process, in pursuance of predetermined
learning objectives. Considered from another perspective, a training method can also be viewed as a
means of communicating with a particular group of participants or reaching out to them in the
context of a training programme with the expressed purpose of enhancing learning. It is therefore,
evident that a training method is not an end in itself, but a means to achieve certain specific
objectives.
Training methods have a lot of variations. Some are relatively low risk methods and demand little
involvement from the participants. On the other hand, there are those whose success depends on
active participation of the group. Some training methods need minimal preparations but some
others require elaborate preparatory work. Some test the level of expertise of the trainers while
others require a low level of expertise.
3. The trainer may be guided by the acknowledged popularity of the method and its
extensive use by experienced and known trainers
4. The trainer may be driven by a desire to be innovative and experiment with new
methods
5. By using an innovative and modern method, the trainer may want to score a point over
his/her colleagues in the team and stand out as different
6. The trainer may have to attend few other things and hence may need a time off from the
group and hence may be constrained to use a method-Like group discussion or group
assignment-that would keep the group engaged while the trainer is away
7. The trainer may simply want to take away some pressure from himself and therefore,
use a method that would give him some time to relax or reduce his energy
2. Special characteristics of the Training Group: Example age, previous training experience,
level of comprehension etc
7. Ease of Presentation:
3. Role-play method
4. Management games
5. Questioning method
9. Brainstorming
Lecture Method
The lecture is, by definition, a composite of words spoken by the trainer. It is thus a verbal –symbol
medium. This is the oldest method of training in which the trainer, by virtue of his knowledge and
expertise in a field, presents orally, in a direct and unilateral manner, the subject matter. It clearly
implies a one-way communication. In this method , the possibility of significant learning is greatly
diminished by the lack of interaction not only between the trainer and the participants but among
the participants as well.
1) The most obvious application is where there is a large number of participants needing
information, and where participation is not possible because of the sheer size of the group
2) The main attraction of lecturing as a method of training is its deceptive simplicity and the
control over the session and the participants it purportedly gives to a trainer
3) Usually, in a lecture, the participants are expected to listen carefully and reflect on the
subject and clear their doubts either before or after the lecture
4) Because of the live voice and manner, and the ambience generally associated with the
presentation of the lecture, the trainer can make facts come alive, making the session more
inspiring and full of variety
1) In this method, it is assumed that the participants can by themselves, through reading
and informal discussions, bridge the gap between the contents of the lecture and the
realities at their work situation, but in the actual scenario, there is no assurance, that the
participants will be willing to invest further time and effort to build on the knowledge
transmitted by the lecture
2) There is no gurantee, that this method stimulates thinking or actively involves the
participants.
3) The whole onus for the success of the method lies on the trainer
4) The process of lecturing calls for motivation and commitment on the part of the
individual
7) The very qualities of a good lecture threaten its value as a training method, aiming to
develop the potential and understanding of the participants.
8) The lack of involvement of the participant leaves the trainer without any feedback on
the assimilation of the materials and the inputs by the participants.
3) Since by its very nature, the lecture method tends to be relatively passive and
uninspiring, it needs to have a built-in participatory element in order to stand a
reasonable chance of satisfying its learning objectives
4) The trainer should not feel inhibited to use visual aids to emphasize, highlisht or
elaborate a point
5) If reading and assignments about a topic or a subject precede the lecture, the
trainer can present the facts in the context of such readings, making the lecture
learner-friendly, turning it into a understandable whole
6) Handouts could also be used, but with some care and discretion
7) The effectiveness of the lecture method also depends on its place among other
methods in the same programme
Advantages
Can reinforce trainer’s credibility and authority
Disadvantages
One-way: not effective if goal is shared responsibly
Objectives:
The objectives of this method vary in accordance with the learning objectives for the session or the
topic
This method can be used to stimulate an analytical, in-depth discussion with a view to
presenting a multifaceted or an integrated perspective of the situation for better
understanding, guidance and action of the participants.
The case study method can help in deriving useful generalisations or principles regarding
working in the field
This method can develop a knowledge of skills in the participants that will help them to deal
with a multitude of situations in their job that require regular action or intervention
As case study is embellished with description of people and situations taken from real life
situations with which the participants are familiar and can even identify with, this method
also promotes exploration and awareness of one’s attitudes, values and patterns of job or
personal behaviour
This method can be effective in enhancing the involvement of participants in the process of
learning
It is desirable that a case study should be based on genuine data and situations
If the case deals with real situation, the trainer should be aware of the effects of the actual
outcome, in order to enable him to compare and contrast the participants’ findings and
conclusions.
Before the case study method is introduced, it may be useful to prepare the participant’s by
exposing them to basic concepts likely to be emphasised in the case study and providing the
appropriate theoretical input
Writing a good case study is an important aspect of the use of this method, hence preparing
a case requires good writing and communication skills
The situations or the problems chosen for the case should be consistent with the broad
objectives of the training programme
There are numerous sources of material for writing a case study-available documentation on
the functioning of related organisations, participants’ experiences in appropriate areas, or
through research. However, it is important for the trainer to ensure that the case is as close
to reality as possible, and relevant to the learning objectives of the group.
In case the group is composed of individuals belonging to the same organisation, there is an
advantage in using case studies derived from the common experience of the participants,
however their involvement can introduce an element of biasness and prejudices too
The length of the case may vary considerably, depending on the learning objectives, the
nature of the issues it seeks to focus, and the time allotted for the analysis and the
discussion
The situation or the problems around which the case is structured should reflect objectivity
The case is written in the past tense with identities/locations suitably camouflaged, so that
names of the organisation and concerned individuals are protected
The trainer must also analyse the ability of the participants to analyse available data and
information, their experience in dealing with the issues and problem highlighted in the case,
as also their skills in the discussion
The next step is to identify the problems or issues, the trainer wishes to deal with in the
case. It is advisable to focus on one or two situations or problems instead of all the issues
and problems which might make the participants confused
The data should be collected in ample amount, keeping in view the approaches or actions
the trainer wish to highlight in the case. However the quality of data should also be kept in
mind
The collected data and information must be arranged in a logical structure or scheme.
Once all the previous steps are covered, the trainer is now ready to write the first draft
The language of the draft should be easy, simple and comprehensible
Once the main body is completed, the trainer may write the introductory paragraphs
The trainer then must go over the case again to ensure that relevant details have not been
missed out
The next step is to set out the tasks that the trainer expect the group to accomplish during
the discussion, this could be in the form of decisions, a range of solutions to the problems or
conclusions, depending on the learning outcomes of the session
The trainer’s role is to help the participants individually and collectively in clarifying
their understanding of the people and the situations mentioned in the case. They
should be able to analyse the decisions and the actions indicated in the case and
draw inferences from them
For carrying out the trainer’s responsibility with discretion, finesse and sagacity, a
key prerequisite is that the trainer should be fully conversant with all aspects of the
case
It is important to adequately prepare the group for the exercise. In the traditional
way of using the method, the participants receive a printed copy of the case, well in
advance of the discussion
Trainer’s briefing for the exercise should reflect the reality of the situation and its
importance to their respective organisations
Together with the above, it is necessary that the trainer has a good understanding of
the training group and its dynamics
It is also necessary for the trainer to be fully skilled in various discussion techniques
and methods, and capable of eliciting the involvement and participation of all
members of the group
The trainer should be aware of and in contact with his personal biases and
prejudices in the areas and aspects likely to be covered by the discussion
To increase the total participation, the trainer may consider dividing the group into
smaller sub-groups
Advantages
Can focus the discussion and learning experience
Limitations
It is not always possible to get quality materials in adequate quantities for developing good
case studies, appropriate for use in a variety of training situations
However realistic the data may be, the off-the-job training environment introduces an
artificial element, there is therefore, the risk that the participants may treat the whole
experience with a certain degree of detachment and not enter into the spirit of an activity
that can and should have a practice based outcome
There is also a shortage of skilled trainers capable of guiding discussion of case studies in a
training group
It is often difficult to sustain the interest and enthusiasm of the group in the discussion or to
maintain the tempo
One of the criticisms levelled at the case studies by participants is that they are often
bombarded with a whole volume of information that utterly bewilders them
The case study method is time consuming and can therefore, be used only under special
situations in a training programme
Objectives
Role-play is a key training method for engendering behavioural changes. The actions,
behaviour, interactions of the participants during the exercise, form the basis of self-
appraisal and feedback from others in the group
It is also a training tool to improve the skills of the participants in the areas of
problem solving and decision-making
The case study has the ‘there and then’ rather than the ‘here and now’
emphasis as in the role-play. The scenario is much more live and dynamic in
the role-play method
The case study emphasises facts and situations and deals with the analysis
and responses of the participants, but the role-playing stresses the
importance of their behaviour, reactions and feelings
The case study is based on facts and circumstances, given in the narrative
and these cannot be changed, on the other hand, despite the given scripts
and the framework of the roles, the route that a role-play takes is not so
predictable. There could be constant changes in the situations as the events
unfold and interaction intensifies
The trainer has greater control on the process and contents in a case study
than in role play. The level and nature of skills required to handle the
exercise are far more complex in a role-play than in a case study
Outcomes of a role-play are often the most satisfactory when it is preceded by some
prior input in the training programme, either through lectures or exercises and methods.
The role play is thus used as an opportunity for the participants to put into practice some of
the acquired knowledge and skills.
In a role play, the participants actually engage in actual behaviour, confronting problems
and interacting with other individuals associated with the situation
The role-play should be able to promote interaction among different players, within
the framework of the objectives for the exercise
Although roles are defined through scripts, there is scope for the participants to
evolve and develop their respective roles
The whole group has to be briefed about the role-play, the rules governing it and
other do’s and don’ts for the role-players
The trainer has to effectively monitor the role-play through observation, ensuring
that there are no major deviations from the objectives of the exercise
For the discussion, following the exercise, the group needs to be suitably briefed. If
there are no proper guidelines for discussion, it will lack focus.
Participants should be cautioned not to allow their personal prejudices and biases to
get the better of them while playing the role.
It is always useful to appoint separate observers for the process and contents of the
play
The various skills required in the role-play method also cover coping skills of the
participants and patterns of communication in the sub-groups and the larger group
It will be useful to prepare observation sheets for the observers listing important
guidelines.
Types of Role-play
Simple Role play
Multiple Role-plays
Simple Role play-This is the simplest form of role-play. The role-playing group
performs before a group or an audience that acts as the observer and at the end,
analyses and evaluates the exercise. This procedure is quite useful for the
demonstrations, developing sensitivity to the feelings and behaviour of others,
intensive training and use of small groups. This method also helps in training in
observation, as all participants other than than the role-players are involved in the
observation.
Multiple Role-plays- When the role-play is to involve the whole or a large part
of the group, multiple role-playing may be adopted. In this exercise, the group is
divided into convenient role-playing groups, and the various sub-groups play the
roles simultaneously, working on the same situation. Generally this type role-play is
structured and is staged after proper preparations that may include written scripts
and instructions. After a specified time, the role-play is terminated and the
discussion begins.
Role play can also be developed to meet specific needs of an organisation, if the
entire group is constituted of participants from one organisation.
Most Role-plays are conducted for specific periods of time, hence time is a
very important factor in role play
Role-plays may be highly structured, with well defined roles; conversely
they may allow the participants a great deal of flexibility in acting out the
roles.
The trainer may decide to arrange for backup guidance for the role-players,
in the form of support or reference groups, to enable them to fully
understand the role and play it more realistically
The structure of the role-play determines the physical arrangements for the
exercise
If the training team takes up the task of assigning roles, it should be done on
the basis of some knowledge of the background and personality of the
participants.
If there are differences in status and position among the participants, it may
create a problem of attitude or demeanour and this effect interaction
among various role players. If the participants belong to the same
organization, the problem can become more complicated but it can be
tackled with the assistance of those responsible for organising the training
programme.
The trainer may opt for role inversion in assigning the roles. Those who are
more vocal may be given a low key role and vice versa.
Role Briefs
Observers’ Sheet
Making Physical Arrangements for the Exercise
It is a good strategy to precede the exercise by a brief presentation, dealing with the issues
and the problems that form the basis of the role-play.
It is extremely helpful if at the very outset, the trainer specifies the reasons behind using this
training method for the topic under discussion.
It is likely that some members of the training group would not have participated in a role-
play earlier, hence it would be useful if the trainer provides a brief introduction to the
method, explaining its broad objectives, the process and its various aspects
The trainer then should move on to brief the group on the exercises that he/she has
designed for it. The trainer should outline the broad parameters. Underscore its training
value in terms of learning objectives and relevance to their work, explain the norms and
standards under which the exercise will be conducted and the role players would operate.
Encourge the participants to ask questions and express their concerns and misgivings about
the exercise. Let the participants seek clarifications on their role and contribution and clear
their doubts. This will help them shed some of their inhibitions and nervousness.
While stressing the need for working together as a group to ensure the success of the
exercise, the trainer should highlight the significance of individual contributions.
The trainer must explain the purpose and procedure for the feedback and how it would be
used during the discussion session, following the completion of the main activity.
The trainer must help to develop the interpersonal group communication skills of the
participants and help the participants in expressing their views in a clear and succinct
manner.
The role-play is also an effective means of changing attitudes through the influence of peers
in the group.
It is also a valuable means of obtaining feedback for the training team on verbal skills,
motivation level and personal traits of the participants and characteristics of the group.
For some role-play design, a very effective way of role briefing is to designate
support individuals or groups of people who can function as coaches during the
caucusing sessions
The trainer should brief the individuals/ sub-groups and the observers separately
Each participant is assigned a specific role in the context of the total exercise and
should get a brief specially relating to the role and the particular set of
circumstances to be enacted
In briefing the role-players, the trainer should not make the mistake of assuming
that people know how to get into their roles
It is important that the trainer should be thoroughly familiar with all role-play
materials before attempting to use them with the group
The trainer’s notes should also have statements about the length of time required to
conduct and process the role-play, the degree of skills needed by the participants to
engage in and process the role-play
If it is found that the players are deviating substantially from the role instructions or
the script, then the trainer must intervene, to correct the same
It is important that the trainer must be aware of what is likely to happen in the role-
play and have a sense of relative importance of situations and events that are likely
to unfold as the activity progresses
The trainer must use tact and sensitivity in dealing with role-players as they work
through the problem situations
The trainer must keep the participants interested and involved in the exercise at all
times
While the role playing is in progress, the trainer should be able to modulate the
intensity of the event
The notes may also contain suggestions for facilitating the discussion after the role
play has been acted out
Depending on the role-play design with the help of the observers, the trainer may
consider interviewing the role players at the end of the activity to know about the
dynamics behind their actions and interrelationships in the role-play.
The trainer should plan the discussion in a way that the threat perception is
reduced. The feedback needs to be constructive, otherwise it will become counter-
productive
Preparation of the participants for the analysis of their actions and behaviour is a
key task for a trainer
The feedback session sometimes can be a rough ride for the trainer. It can produce
unexpectedly unpleasant situations. The discussion can become acrimonious and,
sometimes, even bitter
The trainer must have the enterprise to bring out the key learning points after
analysing the group interactions and actions of the role-players and the sub-groups.
After analysis and discussion, the role play may be conducted. However, before the
participants leave the room it is important to debrief them to ensure that they come
out of the roles that they had played. This is necessary to enable them to start their
normal work in the group
People could also feel threatened when they perceive that their actions and behaviour are
under observation or scrutiny, and are destined to be discussed at a later stage, and they
may become cautious and guarded, curbing spontaneity of action
Some participants may feel that they may look foolish before the group, playing someone
else. It is the responsibility of the trainer to allay these fears and address the concerns of the
participants and provide an atmosphere that is mutually supportive rather than critical
The principal drawback with the method is that it is open to criticism for lack of realism.
As personalities play an important part in the exercise, in many ways the actual dynamics
and inter-relationships of the training group are likely to affect the behaviour of the role-
players and the sub-groups
Not many trainers have the required skills in writing a role-play and conducting it
One obvious disadvantage of this method is that the artificiality or the superficiality of the
situations depicted in the role-play scenarios can allow the participants to discount the
value of their learning because of the over simplification of the situation
Roles in this method sometimes reinforce stereotypes and caricature people’s behaviour
Management Games
A Management game is a training method that deals with certain specific aspects of business
or administration. It is simulated exercise representing as closely as possible, the constraints
and pressures of the day-to-day work environment of the participants.
Objectives
Business games can be used for
orienting the participants and familiarising them with the functional dynamics of an
organisation
The games can be used in conjunction with other training techniques, including
structured experiences, instruments, lectures and audio-visuals. Business games aim to
enhance the participants’ understanding of:
The trainer should also decide what the sequence and the flow of the course of
action would be and plan for a balance between the cognitive and experiential
learning.
It is also necessary that the trainer should make himself fully familiar with the
various components of the game and know how the game works, the sequence of
events and decisions that are likely to unfold and how it responds to the
participant’s actions
The design of the game may facilitate the provision of a role for each participant
representing an individual decision-making unit, however, in most cases, group
decision-making is the rule.
The time available to the teams for making decisions is normally related to the
complexity of the game and the nature of problems they are expected to deal with.
After becoming familiar with the details of the game, the trainer should decide on
the time schedule
Materials must be collected or prepared. The layout of the room and other physical
arrangements must be attended to.
The terms and language used for the exercise should be the same as used in the
training programme
The trainer must tell the participants that their job is to learn the rules and
procedures of the game just as they would learn to operate within any social or
organisational structure
The introduction to the game should also give a brief explanation of why this
particular game was selected, what its objectives are, and how it is related to other
theories, models, or methodologies presented in the overall training design
The trainer must ensure that the participants understand the game properly before
it gets underway
The trainer also fully understand the game and be familiar with its various aspects,
situations and constraints
As the participants may be confused and apprehensive at first, they may try to find
reasons for their lack of expertise. Many will find fault with the game on the trainer’s
instructions, hence the trainer should not get upset or irritated by this
While the participants are playing the game, the trainer’s role depends on its nature.
In some games the trainer may be required to serve as referee or arbiter, in some
the trainer may be expected to answer questions about the rules of the game,
procedures, next steps and so on
Each team comes up with various decisions which is reported to the trainer. It is the
trainer’s task to critique them and provide them with prompt feedback
One of the task for the trainer is to oversee what is happening during the game in
order to determine how to improve it during the next round or session and to
prepare for the processing discussion that will follow
The trainer must maintain the momentum by feeding back results on his/her
appraisal quickly
Each team may be invited to review the final results of its work in the light of the
policies and objectives it had set for itself
Where ever possible, comparisons must be made with real-life situations as the
issues come to the fore in the discussion. Some may consider the game as an
oversimplification
Another area of discussion will be the patterns of behaviour within the teams-
difficulties in establishing a working organisation and in reaching a coordinated
decision at the right time, as also problems concerning delegation and responsibility
The evaluation may also bring to the fore the connections between the
interpersonal dynamics and the tasks and structures of the game
Finally, they should be asked to state what they learnt or unlearnt from the
experience and how the details of the game process were different from what they
expected
Questioning Method
Questioning is probably used most frequently by trainers, however, it isn’t learned
quickly. The art of questioning takes lots of preparation and practice.
Discussions through questioning between the facilitator and participants and those
among participants are a useful experience because the learners can take a more
active role, help to determine more of the content to be discussed, and utilise more
of their senses.
Types
Structured: The facilitator prepares a list of questions to be discussed based on defined
objectives for holding this discussion. The content is more carefully controlled by the nature of the
questions asked
Free Form: this type is used when participants need to air their feelings and opinions. The
facilitator needs to announce the purposes of this kind of discussion, explain ground rules and
carefully monitor the process. Here the participants take more control of the content and the
discussion
Provide trainer with the feedback about how the experience is being received
Asking Questions
Types of Questions-Questions can be ‘closed’ or ‘open’
Phrasing Questions
Directing Questions
Some ways to handle answers that will maintain a high level of participation are:
Acknowledge the effort of the respondent, regardless of whether the answer was
right or wrong
Responding to Questions
Trainer’s Role
In using this training method in a training programme, the trainer can follow two
approaches. Either he may decide to provide comprehensive instructions to the participants,
necessary for carrying out the task or else the participants may receive very little input
before taking up the assignment
The briefing in this method should also focus on mutual objectives, planning cooperation
and working in a team, reinforcing each other’s efforts
The method presupposes the trainer’s trust in the capacity and initiative of the participants
to carry out the task without the trainer’s direct and substantive intervention
The learning activity is devised to enable the participants to control their own learning
process, to learn at their own pace
There is a great deal of involvement among the participants in their own learning and all
their senses are called into play, as a result, the motivational level in the assignment is
generally very high
It is also good method to assess the performance of the participants, provide feedback on a
number of personal attributes of the participants such as attitude to work and range of skills
This method also provides a useful basis for developing performance tests to appraise how
much the participants have assimilated through prior learning activities in the training
programme
Writing Assignments
Individual or group assignments can also take the form of written assignments on a
particular topic or on issues related to a training area. In this form, they aim to enhance the
cognitive learning of the participants, help them consider the topic or issues from different
standpoints, or develop their skills in systematic thinking and in presenting their thoughts in
a succinct manner
This method broadens the outlook of the participants through cross fertilisation and
exposure to new and different experiences and ideas and enrich their understanding of the
issues under discussion
This method helps in developing the interpersonal group communication skills and helps in
expressing their views in a clear and succinct manner
It is also an effective means of changing attitudes through the influence of peers in the group
It is also a valuable means of obtaining feedback for the training team on verbal skills,
motivation level and personal traits of the participants and characteristics of the group
In setting up simultaneous groups, the trainer has three broad options. All the groups may
be given similar tasks or assignments. The group may also be given tasks that are
complementary-for instance, aspects of an issue or sub-topics of a bigger topic. The third
possibility is that the groups are given different unrelated tasks, for later sharing in the
plenary
Trainer’s next task is to set out specifically and explicitly the intended outcomes from the
exercise
The composition of the groups also needs attention. Each group should be properly balanced
if the dynamics are to be correct, with the right proportion and combination of strong
contributors, shy, introverts, logical thinkers, analysts and happy followers
The group should select its own discussion leader but once this has been done, the trainer’s
task is to brief the leader on his role to lead the group to the desired objectives
The trainer may give specific guidelines for the discussion or the group may be left free to
decide on the way it wants to discuss the topic or the issues
Open-ended and carefully worded questions can generate an interesting discussion with
most individual participants.
The trainer also have the option of either establishing the procedures and ground rules for
the conduct of the exercise or leaving this task to the group to decide
Good group discussions do not just happen. The trainer must either build a climate that
allows the participant to be comfortable enough to participate, or the topic must be so
compelling that they cannot remain silent and are fired by an urge to share and contribute
The sub-groups should also receive guidelines for preparing the report for presentation in
the plenary.
The places that are allotted for the syndicate groups to meet should be comfortable to get
the maximum participation and provide an environment that is conductive to participation
The group may not fully perceive the objectives and meaning of the deliberations or
comprehend the issues that need to be focussed upon, therefore the task may not be
carried out on the desired lines
The group may be so overwhelmed by the desire to complete the task in double quick time
and to achieve results, that the group process that is central to this method, may get ignored
or sidelined.
A group discussion can turn into an endless debate unless it is properly organised and
controlled
The leader’s role is to stimulate the members, ensure that the focus of the discussion
remains on the issues or the topic and encourage participants by more members of the
group.
The leader should not control the discussion but guide it in such a way that it remains on
course. The ownership of the process and the contents should be devolved to the group
As discussed, in any discussion group, some members are inclined to control or dominate
the discussion. The leader must skilfully restrain the more aggressive and dominant
elements
The leader should make certain that the discussion stays on course and the focus remains on
the agreed agenda
It is a huge help to the group if the discussion leader, periodically highlights and summarises
key points of discussion
The group may also require the assistance of the discussion leader in the preparation of the
group report
The trainer should provide the guidelines to the groups for preparing the group
reports. If the reports are prepared in an agreed format, it facilitates presentation
and consolidation
In most cases, the group reports are not expected to be in the form of a narrative,
explaining the process of discussion. They are developed along the core points,
bringing about the main substance of the discussion
However, if the objectives of setting up discussion groups are aimed at promoting
interpersonal communication among the participants and encourage them to open
up and share, reports will focus on these aspects
If the task is not clearly defined, the discussion may lack focus, and as a result, it may
be unproductive
Difficulties can arise if the leader is unskilled in guiding the discussion and/or not
familiar with the topic or issues
As this is a group task, some members may take it easy and not feel constrained to
participate
Physical Arrangements
The physical arrangements for the sessions are also significant. The panellists are generally seated,
facing the group, with the moderator of the discussion seated in the middle
The control of the contents and the process rests heavily with the panellists or the
moderator
If the panellists are not effective communicators, the session can be boring and dull
Group participation though is minimal, the trainer can, however, enhance the
involvement of the group by providing for a question-answer session at the end of
the presentations.
If the sub-topics or the contents overlap beyond reasonable limits, the presentations
can be very boring for the audience and, possibly even a waste of time
Brainstorming Method
Brainstorming is a specialized form of discussion method that can be used in a
training situation. Many trainers believe that brainstorming means a random and
structured way of generating ideas and solutions. This obviously is not true.
Brainstorming is certainly not a straightforward method of decision-making or
problem solving. At the heart of this method is the principle that as ideas or
solutions are proposed, comments and evaluations are suspended until the time this
step is completed and the group is ready to move onto the next step of analysis. It is
also based on the premise that it is not good to shoot down an idea or proposal
without properly considering its merits and demerits in an unbiased manner.
Another principle this method is based on is the principle of synergy. It is possible to
generate more ideas collectively than the sum of the ideas that would be produced
individually.
Encouraging shy and reluctant participants to share their ideas and views without fear of
getting an immediate negative reaction from other colleagues
Promoting attitudes that will help the participants work more effectively in groups
Steps in Brainstorming
Generation of Ideas-The starting point is to generate a large number of ideas within a short
span of time. Thus, there is a comparatively greater emphasis on quantity and encouraging members
to think and be creative in generating new ideas, proposals or options. Quality or merit is assessed
later, lest it should inhibit or even stifle the process of generation of ideas. It is the task of the
discussion leader to ensure that this basic principle is not violated. No discussion should be
permitted, except to clarify a thought or statement. It is likely that some ideas put forward by the
members may be totally outlandish and irrelevant. But sometimes, a sound solution may emerge.
These ideas may be further worked upon by the group and refined to make them more relevant, in
line with the criteria set out by the group and acceptable to it.
Amending Ideas-The discussion leader can intervene if the ideas expressed need to be
amended through elaboration, editing or consolidation. He also has the task to assist those who are
not in a position to articulate their views. He should avoid any analysis at this stage. Leaders should
also ensure that ideas expressed earlier should not be opposed or repudiated
Posting All the Ideas on a Flip Chart- It will be helpful to post all the ideas generated
through this exercise on a flip chart. This will reinforce the contributions of those who have
contributed earlier and serve as a point of reference and an encouragement for those who follow
Analysing Ideas- Once all the ideas are posted, the discussion leader should proceed to
analyse them, going in chronological order. In this step all the factors which could have any bearing
on the final decision of the group, should be duly considered
Action Planning- At this stage the group outlines the stage to complement the decision
Preparing and Using Training Support Materials- Training support materials are
usually used in combination or in support of other training methods. The main objective for using
these materials is to enrich the presentation or promote the learning process. Training support
materials are resources which if properly used, assist a trainer in accomplishing specific training
objectives.
Training support materials may be of different types and
forms. These can be classified into two broad categories
Audio-visual materials
Printed materials
The timing of the visit is of crucial importance to the training programme. If the learning
outcomes from the trip or benefits accruing out of it are to be related to certain specific
topics or modules of the programme, the visit has to be organised close to the classroom
activity.
In deciding the time of the trip, the convenience of the visiting organisation should also be
considered. Sometimes, the trip is organised at a time when appropriate officials of the
organisation, who are best equipped to provide the required information and details on its
work, are committed elsewhere
If the training team is convinced of the desirability and the relevance of the trip, the next trip
will be to set out its objectives
To facilitate this, the group should be asked to prepare questions and identify areas around
which information must be sought during the trip
Preferably, the larger group should be divided into smaller, more functional sub-groups.
Each sub-group should be given a specific task within the overall assignments for the group
to study in a more intense manner. It should prepare a set of questions to which answers
should be provided by the officials of the organization
It is also important that after field trip is over, there should be thorough discussion on the
benefits accruing out of the exercise and learning points emerging
Demonstration Method
A demonstration is an illustrated presentation that requires a trainer to demonstrate to the
participants how to do a thing. He carries out a task or a process through a series of actions
or steps to enable the participants to observe and understand the procedure, principle or
phenomenon. To reinforce the presentation, one or two participants may be asked to carry
out the same activity under his guidance. It may be visual, practical presentation
accompanied by a discussion.
This method will suit a wide range of objectives with specific procedure, skill or reflex
behaviour
Advantages
Demonstration has verbal as well as visual components. Therefore, by
watching carefully, the participants have the opportunity of learning key
points
The trainer can control the pace and easily alter it to meet the needs of the
group. The demonstration can be repeated if necessary
It enables the trainer to relate the principles and theories to real world
situations.
Disadvantages
Required equipment for this method may not always be available or may be too
sophisticated to be used in a real life situation, eg., a Magnetic Resonance Imager(MRI), or a
tunnelling electron microscope
The demonstration should be carried out slowly so that the participants do not miss
any key points
It must be ensured that the trainer should talk to the participants or the group and
not to the object or equipment in front of him
The trainer must communicate with the participants, periodically should ask them
whether they are following the demonstration or the presentation. The trainer must
teach them not only to observe but also to think. The trainer also should watch out
for non-verbal clues from the participants for a feedback on how well the
demonstration is being received by the participants
The demonstration should be kept short and simple with a few key points as
possible
It must be ensured that the steps are not only logical but also appear to be logical to
the participants
The trainer should start from basic concepts and build on this to include difficult
steps that the participants must understand and follow
The objectives must be double checked and before the demonstration is started, the
objectives must be clarified enabling the participants to know and focus
The trainer should plan the introduction carefully. He must use question to check if
the participants are fully familiar with all the concepts, the skills, and the context,
well before the demonstration begins