025 - Mit8 - 01scs22 - Chapter25 PDF
025 - Mit8 - 01scs22 - Chapter25 PDF
025 - Mit8 - 01scs22 - Chapter25 PDF
25-1
Chapter 25 Celestial Mechanics
...and if you want the exact moment in time, it was conceived mentally on
8th March in this year one thousand six hundred and eighteen, but
submitted to calculation in an unlucky way, and therefore rejected as
false, and finally returning on the 15th of May and adopting a new line of
attack, stormed the darkness of my mind. So strong was the support from
the combination of my labour of seventeen years on the observations of
Brahe and the present study, which conspired together, that at first I
believed I was dreaming, and assuming my conclusion among my basic
premises. But it is absolutely certain and exact that "the proportion
between the periodic times of any two planets is precisely the
sesquialterate proportion of their mean distances ..." 1
Johannes Kepler
Johannes Kepler first formulated the laws that describe planetary motion,
II. The radius vector from the sun to a planet sweeps out equal areas in equal time.
III. The period of revolution T of a planet about the sun is related to the semi-major
2
axis a of the ellipse by T 2 = k a 3 where k is the same for all planets.
The third law was published in 1619, and efforts to discover and solve the equation of
motion of the planets generated two hundred years of mathematical and scientific
discovery. In his honor, this problem has been named the Kepler Problem.
When there are more than two bodies, the problem becomes impossible to solve
exactly. The most important “three-body problem” in the 17th and 18th centuries involved
finding the motion of the moon, due to gravitational interaction with both the sun and the
earth. Newton realized that if the exact position of the moon were known, the longitude
of any observer on the earth could be determined by measuring the moon’s position with
respect to the stars.
In the eighteenth century, Leonhard Euler and other mathematicians spent many
years trying to solve the three-body problem, and they raised a deeper question. Do the
small contributions from the gravitational interactions of all the planets make the
planetary system unstable over long periods of time? At the end of 18th century, Pierre
1
Kepler, Johannes, Harmonice mundi Book 5, Chapter 3, trans. Aiton, Duncan and Field, p. 411
2
As stated in An Introduction to Mechanics, Daniel Kleppner and Robert Kolenkow, McGraw-Hill, 1973,
p 401.
25-2
Simon Laplace and others found a series solution to this stability question, but it was
unknown whether or not the series solution converged after a long period of time. Henri
Poincaré proved that the series actually diverged. Poincaré went on to invent new
mathematical methods that produced the modern fields of differential geometry and
topology in order to answer the stability question using geometric arguments, rather than
analytic methods. Poincaré and others did manage to show that the three-body problem
was indeed stable, due to the existence of periodic solutions. Just as in the time of
Newton and Leibniz and the invention of calculus, unsolved problems in celestial
mechanics became the experimental laboratory for the discovery of new mathematics.
We now commence a study of the Kepler Problem. We shall determine the equation of
motion for the motions of two bodies interacting via a gravitational force (two-body
problem) using both force methods and conservation laws.
We shall begin by showing how the motion of two bodies interacting via a gravitational
force (two-body problem) is mathematically equivalent to the motion of a single body
acted on by an external central gravitational force, where the mass of the single body is
the reduced mass µ ,
1 1 1 mm
= + ⇒µ= 1 2 . (25.2.1)
µ m1 m2 m1 + m2
Once we solve for the motion of the reduced body in this equivalent one-body problem,
we can then return to the real two-body problem and solve for the actual motion of the
two original bodies. The reduced mass was introduced in Chapter 13 Appendix A of
these notes. That appendix used similar but slightly different notation from that used in
this chapter.
Consider a system consisting of two bodies with masses m1 and m2 interacting via a
gravitational force as shown in Figure 25.1.
R cm
r2 r1
25-3
!
Choose a coordinate system with a choice of origin such that body 1 has position r1 and
body 2 has position r2 . The location of the center of mass is given by the vector
m1 r1 + m2 r2
R cm = . (25.2.2)
m1 + m2
For our two-body system the gravitational forces are internal forces and by Newton’s
Third Law sum to zero. If we assume that there are no external forces acting on our two-
body system, then the center of mass is either at rest of moving with a constant velocity.
We can choose as our reference frame, the center of mass reference frame, that is a
reference frame moving with the velocity of the center of mass with our origin located at
the center of mass.
cm
2
r2 r1 1
x
r1,2 = r1 r2
Figure 25.2 Center of mass reference frame
Let r1′ be the vector from the center of mass to body 1 and r2′ be the vector from the
center of mass to body 2. Then, by the geometry in Figure 25.2, the relative position
!
′ pointing from body 2 to body 1 is equal to
vector r1,2
! ! !
′ = r1′ − r2′ .
r1,2 (25.2.4)
! !
Because the center of mass is located at the origin, R′cm = 0 , therefore
! !
m1 r1′ = −m2 r2′ , (25.2.5)
!
′ ,
The position vector of body 1 can be found in terms of the relative position vector r1,2
! ! ! !⎛ m ⎞
′ = r1′− r2′ = r1′⎜ 1+ 1 ⎟ ⇒
r1,2
⎝ m2 ⎠
. (25.2.6)
! m2 !
r1′ = r′ .
m1 + m2 1,2
25-4
! m1 !
r2′ = − r′ . (25.2.7)
m1 + m2 1,2
In what follows we shall drop the prime indices in the center of mass reference frame
The force on body 2 due to the gravitational interaction between the two bodies can be
described by Newton’s Universal Law of Gravitation
! mm
F1,2 = − G 1 2 2 rˆ1,2 . (25.2.8)
r1,2
where r1,2 is the relative distance between bodies 1 and 2. Newton’s Second Law can be
applied individually to the two bodies:
d 2r1
F2,1 = m1 2 , (25.2.9)
dt
d 2r2
F1,2 = m2 2 . (25.2.10)
dt
Dividing through by the mass in each of Equations (25.2.9) and (25.2.10) yields
F2,1 d 2r1
= 2 , (25.2.11)
m1 dt
F1,2 d 2r2
= 2 . (25.2.12)
m2 dt
Subtracting the expression in Equation (25.2.12) from that in Equation (25.2.11) yields
! !! ! 2!
F2,1 F1,2
d 2r1 d 2r2 d r1,2
− = 2 − 2 = . (25.2.13)
m1 m2 dt dt dt 2
Newton’s Third Law requires that the force on body 2 is equal in magnitude and opposite
in direction to the force on body 1,
F1,2 = −F2,1 . (25.2.14)
2!
! ⎛ 1 1 ⎞ d r1,2
F2,1 ⎜ + ⎟ = . (25.2.15)
⎝ m1 m2 ⎠ dt 2
25-5
Define the reduced mass µ , by
1 1 1
= + (25.2.16)
µ m1 m2
Rewrite Eq. (25.2.15) as
!
! d 2r1,2
F2,1 = µ 2 (25.2.17)
dt
where F2,1 is given by Equation (25.2.8). Using the reduced mass, the position vector of
body 1 can be written as
! µ !
r1 = r. (25.2.18)
m1
and
! µ !
r2 = − r (25.2.19)
m2
When one mass is much smaller than the other, for example m1 << m2 , then the reduced
mass is approximately the smaller mass,
m1 m2 mm
µ= ≅ 1 2 = m1 . (25.2.20)
m1 + m2 m2
Our result has a special interpretation using Newton’s Second Law. Let µ be the
!
mass of a single body with position vector r1,2 = r1,2 r̂1,2 with respect to an origin O , where
rˆ1,2 is the unit vector pointing from the origin O to the single body. Then the equation of
motion, Equation (25.2.17), implies that the single body of mass µ is under the influence
of an attractive gravitational force pointing toward the origin. So, the original two-body
gravitational problem has now been reduced to an equivalent one-body problem,
involving a single body with mass µ under the influence of an attractive central force
!
F2,1 . Note that in this reformulation, there is no body located at the central point (the
origin O ). In what follows we shall drop the indices 1,2 and write Eq. (25.2.17) as
!
Gm1m2 d 2r
− r̂ = µ 2 (25.2.21)
r2 dt
The parameter r in the one-body problem is the distance between the reduced mass and
the central point, and also the relative distance between bodies 1 and 2. This reduction of
the physical two-body problem to a mathematical description of a one body problem
generalizes to all central forces.
25-6
25.3 Energy and Angular Momentum, Constants of the Motion
The equivalent one-body problem has two constants of the motion, energy E and the
angular momentum L about the origin O . Energy is a constant because in our original
two-body problem, the gravitational interaction was an internal conservative force.
Angular momentum is constant about the origin because the only force is directed
towards the origin, and hence the torque about the origin due to that force is zero (the
vector from the origin to the single body is anti-parallel to the force vector and sin π = 0 ).
Because angular momentum is constant, the orbit of the single body lies in a plane with
the angular momentum vector pointing perpendicular to this plane.
In the plane of the orbit, choose polar coordinates (r, θ ) for the single body (see Figure
25.3), where r is the distance of the single body from the central point that is now taken
as the origin O , and θ is the angle that the single body makes with respect to a chosen
direction, and which increases positively in the counterclockwise direction.
Figure 25.3 Coordinate system for the orbit of the single body
There are two approaches to describing the motion of the single body. We can try to find
both the distance from the origin, r(t) and the angle, θ (t) , as functions of the parameter
time, but in most cases explicit functions can’t be found analytically. We can also find
the distance from the origin, r(θ ) , as a function of the angle θ . This second approach
offers a spatial description of the motion of the single body (see Appendix 25A).
Consider the single body with mass µ given by Equation (25.2.1), orbiting about a
central point under the influence of a radially attractive force given by Equation (25.2.8).
Since the force is conservative, the potential energy (from the two-body problem) with
choice of zero reference point U (∞) = 0 is given by
G m1 m2
U (r) = − . (25.3.1)
r
The total energy E is constant, and the sum of the kinetic energy and the potential
energy is
1 G m1 m2
E = µ v2 − . (25.3.2)
2 r
25-7
The kinetic energy term µv 2 / 2 is written in terms of the mass µ and the relative speed
v of the two bodies. Choose polar coordinates such that
ˆ
v = vr r̂ + vθ θ,
(25.3.3)
dr
v= v = ,
dt
1 ⎡⎛ dr ⎞ ⎛ dθ ⎞ ⎤ G m1 m2
2 2
E = µ ⎢⎜ ⎟ + ⎜ r ⎟ ⎥ − . (25.3.4)
2 ⎢⎝ dt ⎠ ⎝ dt ⎠ ⎥ r
⎣ ⎦
dθ
L O = rO × µ v = rr̂ × µ (vr r̂ + vθ θ̂) = µ rvθ k̂ = µ r 2 k̂ ≡ Lk̂ (25.3.5)
dt
with magnitude
dθ
L = µ r vθ = µ r 2 . (25.3.6)
dt
We shall explicitly eliminate the θ dependence from Equation (25.3.4) by using our
expression in Equation (25.3.6),
dθ L
= . (25.3.7)
dt µ r 2
2
1 ⎛ dr ⎞ 1 L2 G m1 m2
E = µ⎜ ⎟ + − . (25.3.8)
2 ⎝ dt ⎠ 2 µ r 2 r
1
dr 2⎛ 1 L G m1 m2 ⎞
2 2
= ⎜ E− + . (25.3.9)
dt µ⎝ 2 µr 2
r ⎟⎠
Equation (25.3.9) can in principle be integrated directly for r(t) . In fact, doing the
integrals is complicated and beyond the scope of this book. The function r(t) can then,
in principle, be substituted into Equation (25.3.7) and can then be integrated to find θ (t) .
25-8
Instead of solving for the position of the single body as a function of time, we
shall find a geometric description of the orbit by finding r(θ ) . We first divide Equation
(25.3.7) by Equation (25.3.9) to obtain
dθ
dθ dt
= =
L 1/ r 2( )
. (25.3.10)
dr dr 2µ ⎛ L2
G m1 m2 ⎞
1/2
dt ⎜⎝ E − 2 µ r 2 + r ⎟⎠
dθ =
L (1/ r )
2
dr . (25.3.11)
1/2
2µ ⎛ L2 G m1 m2 ⎞
⎜⎝ E − +
2µ r 2 r ⎟⎠
Equation (25.3.11) can be integrated to find the radius as a function of the angle θ ; see
Appendix 25A for the exact integral solution. The result is called the orbit equation for
the reduced body and is given by
r0
r= (25.3.12)
1− ε cosθ
where
L2
r0 = (25.3.13)
µ G m1 m2
1
⎛ 2 E L2 ⎞ 2
ε = ⎜ 1+ 2⎟
(25.3.14)
⎝ µ (G m1 m2 ) ⎠
is the eccentricity of the orbit. The two constants of the motion, E and L determine all
the properties of the orbit. Any other pair of properties of the orbit can always be
expressed in terms of the constants E and L .
The two constants of the motion, angular momentum L and mechanical energy E , also
determine in terms of r0 and ε , are
L = ( µ G m1 m2 r0 )1/2 (25.3.15)
G m1 m2 (ε 2 − 1)
E= . (25.3.16)
2r0
25-9
The orbit equation as given in Equation (25.3.12) is a general conic section and is
perhaps somewhat more familiar in Cartesian coordinates. Let x = r cosθ and y = r sin θ ,
with r 2 = x 2 + y 2 . The orbit equation can be rewritten as
r = r0 + ε r cosθ . (25.3.17)
(x 2 + y 2 )1/2 = r0 + ε x . (25.3.18)
x 2 + y 2 = r0 2 + 2 ε x r0 + ε 2 x 2 . (25.3.19)
After rearranging terms, Equation (25.3.19) is the general expression of a conic section
with axis on the x -axis,
x 2 (1− ε 2 ) − 2 ε x r0 + y 2 = r0 2 . (25.3.20)
(We now see that the horizontal axis in Figure 25.3 can be taken to be the x -axis).
Case 1: when ε = 0 , E = Emin < 0 and r = r0 , Equation (25.3.20) is the equation for a
circle,
x 2 + y 2 = r0 2 . (25.3.21)
Case 2: when 0 < ε < 1 , Emin < E < 0 , Equation (25.3.20) describes an ellipse,
y2 + A x2 − B x = k . (25.3.22)
where A > 0 and k is a positive constant. (Appendix 25C shows how this expression
may be expressed in the more traditional form involving the coordinates of the center of
the ellipse and the semi-major and semi-minor axes.)
y 2 r0
x= − . (25.3.23)
2r0 2
25-10
Case 4: when ε > 1 , E > 0 , Equation (25.3.20) describes a hyperbola,
y2 − A x2 − B x = k , (25.3.24)
The energy (Equation (25.3.8)) of the single body moving in two dimensions can be
reinterpreted as the energy of a single body moving in one dimension, the radial direction
r , in an effective potential energy given by two terms,
L2 G m1 m2
U eff = − . (25.4.1)
2µ r 2
r
The energy is still the same, but our interpretation has changed,
2
1 ⎛ dr ⎞ L2 G m1 m2
E = K eff + U eff = µ⎜ ⎟ + − , (25.4.2)
2 ⎝ dt ⎠ 2 µ r 2
r
where the effective kinetic energy K eff associated with the one-dimensional motion is
2
1 ⎛ dr ⎞
K eff = µ⎜ ⎟ . (25.4.3)
2 ⎝ dt ⎠
0 r
Gm1m2
r
25-11
Figure 25.4 Graph of effective potential energy
L2 G m1 m2
E = U eff = − . (25.4.4)
2µ r 2 r
Recall that the potential energy is defined to be the negative integral of the work done by
the force. For our reduction to a one-body problem, using the effective potential, we will
introduce an effective force such that
B
eff B
The fundamental theorem of calculus (for one variable) then states that the integral of the
derivative of the effective potential energy function between two points is the effective
potential energy difference between those two points,
B
dU eff
U eff , B − U eff , A = ∫ dr (25.4.6)
A
dr
Comparing Equation (25.4.6) to Equation (25.4.5) shows that the radial component of the
effective force is the negative of the derivative of the effective potential energy,
dU eff
Freff = − (25.4.7)
dr
The effective potential energy describes the potential energy for a reduced body moving
in one dimension. (Note that the effective potential energy is only a function of the
variable r and is independent of the variable θ ). There are two contributions to the
effective potential energy, and the radial component of the force is then
d d ⎛ L2 G m1 m2 ⎞
Freff = − U eff = − ⎜ − (25.4.8)
dr dr ⎝ 2 µ r 2
r ⎟⎠
25-12
Freff = Fr , centifugal + Fr , gravity , (25.4.9)
d ⎛ L2 ⎞ L2
Fr ,centrifugal = − = . (25.4.10)
dr ⎜⎝ 2 µ r 2 ⎟⎠ µ r 3
Recall from Eq. (25.3.6) that the angular momentum L = µ r vθ . The effective centrifugal
force (Eq. (25.4.10) can then be rewritten as
µ vθ 2
Fr ,centrifugal = . (25.4.11)
r
G m1 m2
Fr , gravity = − . (25.4.12)
r2
With this nomenclature, let’s review the four cases presented in Section 25.3.
The lowest energy state, E0 , corresponds to the minimum of the effective potential
energy, E0 = (U eff )min (Figure 25.5a).
r0
0 r
E = E0
Gm1m2
r
Figure 25.5a Plot of U eff (r) vs. r with energies corresponding to circular orbit
25-13
We can minimize the effective potential energy
dU eff L2 G m1m2
0= =− +
dr r=r0
µ r0 3
r0 2
L2 . (25.4.13)
µG m1m2
m1m2
µ=
m1 + m2
and solve Equation (25.4.13) for r0 ,
L2
r0 = , (25.4.14)
µG m1m2
G m1m2 v0 2
= µ . (25.4.15)
r0 2 r0
0 rmin r rmax
E <0
Gm1m2
r
For E0 < E < 0 , there are two points rmin and rmax such that E = U eff (rmin ) = U eff (rmax ) . At
these points K eff = 0 , therefore dr / dt = 0 which corresponds to a point of closest or
25-14
furthest approach (Figure 25.6). This condition corresponds to the minimum and
maximum values of r for an elliptic orbit.
(a) (b)
Figure 25.6 (a) elliptic orbit, (b) closest and furthest approach
L2 G m1 m2
E= − , r = rmin = rmax , (25.4.16)
2µ r 2 r
G m1 m2 L2
r2 + r− = 0. (25.4.17)
E 2µ E
There are two roots
1/2
G m1 m2 ⎛ ⎛ G m1 m2 ⎞ L2 ⎞
2
⎛ ⎛ 1/2
⎞
G m1 m2 2L2 E ⎞
r=− ⎜ 1± ⎜ 1+ ⎟ ⎟ (25.4.19)
2E ⎜ ⎝ µ (G m1 m2 )2 ⎠ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
1
⎛ 2EL2 ⎞2
ε = ⎜ 1+ 2⎟
, (25.4.20)
⎝ µ (G m1 m2 ) ⎠
and Equation (25.4.19) becomes
25-15
G m1 m2
r=− (1± ε ) . (25.4.21)
2E
A little algebra shows that
r0 L2 / µ G m1 m2
=
1− ε 2 ⎛ 2L2 E ⎞
1− ⎜ 1+ 2⎟
⎝ µ (G m1 m2 ) ⎠
L2 / µGm1m2
= (25.4.22)
−2L2 E / µ (Gm1m2 )2
G m1 m2
=− .
2E
Substituting the last expression in (25.4.22) into Equation (25.4.21) gives an expression
for the points of closest and furthest approach,
r0 r
r= (1± ε ) = 0 . (25.4.23)
1− ε 2
1 ε
r0
r ≡ rmin = (25.4.24)
1+ ε
r0
r ≡ rmax = . (25.4.25)
1− ε
E =0
0 rmin r
Gm1m2
r
25-16
The effective potential energy, as given in Equation (25.4.1), approaches zero ( U eff → 0 )
when the distance r approaches infinity ( r → ∞ ). When E = 0 , as r → ∞ , the kinetic
energy also approaches zero, K eff → 0 . This corresponds to a parabolic orbit (see
Equation (25.3.23)). Recall that in order for a body to escape from a planet, the body
must have an energy E = 0 (we set U eff = 0 at infinity). This escape velocity condition
corresponds to a parabolic orbit. For a parabolic orbit, the body also has a distance of
closest approach. This distance rpar can be found from the condition
L2 G m1 m2
E = U eff (rpar ) = − = 0. (25.4.26)
2 µ rpar 2
rpar
Solving Equation (25.4.26) for rpar yields
L2 1
rpar = = r0 ; (25.4.27)
2 µ G m1 m2 2
the fact that the minimum distance to the origin (the focus of a parabola) is half the
semilatus rectum is a well-known property of a parabola (Figure 25.5).
0 rmin r
Gm1m2
r
When E > 0 , in the limit as r → ∞ the kinetic energy is positive, K eff > 0 . This
corresponds to a hyperbolic orbit (see Equation (25.3.24)). The condition for closest
approach is similar to Equation (25.4.16) except that the energy is now positive. This
implies that there is only one positive solution to the quadratic Equation (25.4.17), the
distance of closest approach for the hyperbolic orbit
r
rhyp = 0 . (25.4.28)
1+ ε
25-17
The constant r0 is independent of the energy and from Equation (25.3.14) as the energy
of the single body increases, the eccentricity increases, and hence from Equation
(25.4.28), the distance of closest approach gets smaller (Figure 25.5).
The orbit of the single body can be circular, elliptical, parabolic or hyperbolic, depending
on the values of the two constants of the motion, the angular momentum and the energy.
Once we have the explicit solution (in this discussion, r(θ ) ) for the single body, we can
find the actual orbits of the two bodies.
Recall that in the center of mass reference frame the position vectors of bodies 1
! ! ! !
and 2 are given by Eqs. (25.2.18), r1 = ( µ / m1 )r , and (25.2.19), r2 = −( µ / m2 )r . Thus
each body undergoes a motion about the center of mass in the same manner that the
single body moves about the central point given by Equation (25.3.12). The only
difference is that the distance from either body to the center of mass is shortened by a
factor µ / mi . When the orbit of the single body is an ellipse, then the orbits of the two
bodies are also ellipses, as shown in Figure 25.8.
2 2
r2
1
r = r1 r2
2 r1 2 1
1 1
center of mass center of mass
When m1 << m2 , then the reduced mass is approximately the smaller mass, µ ! m1 . In
that case, the center of mass is located approximately at the position of the larger mass,
(body 2) and body 1 moves according to
µ
r1′ = r ≅ r , (25.4.29)
m1
while body 2 is approximately stationary,
µ m
r2′ = − r − 1 r ≅ 0 . (25.4.30)
m2 m2
25.6 Kepler’s Laws
25-18
25.6.1 Elliptic Orbit Law
1
⎛ 2E L 2⎞ 2
ε = ⎜ 1+ 2⎟
(25.5.1)
⎝ µ (G m1 m2 ) ⎠
and the eccentricity must fall within the range 0 ≤ ε < 1 . These orbits are either circles or
ellipses. Note the elliptic orbit law is only valid if we assume that there is only one
central force acting. We are ignoring the gravitational interactions due to all the other
bodies in the universe, a necessary approximation for our analytic solution.
II. The radius vector from the sun to a planet sweeps out equal areas in equal time.
Using analytic geometry in the limit of small Δθ , the sum of the areas of the triangles in
Figure 25.9 is given by
1 (r Δθ )
ΔA = (r Δθ )r + Δr (25.5.2)
2 2
1 (r Δθ )r (r Δθ ) Δr
ΔA = + . (25.5.3)
2 Δt 2 Δt
dA 1 2 dθ
= r . (25.5.4)
dt 2 dt
25-19
Recall that according to Equation (25.3.7) (reproduced below as Equation (25.5.5)), the
angular momentum is related to the angular velocity dθ / dt by
dθ L
= (25.5.5)
dt µ r 2
and Equation (25.5.4) is then
dA L
= . (25.5.6)
dt 2 µ
Because L and µ are constants, the rate of change of area with respect to time is a
constant. This is often familiarly referred to by the expression: equal areas are swept out
in equal times (see Kepler’s Laws at the beginning of this chapter).
III. The period of revolution T of a planet about the sun is related to the semi-major
axis a of the ellipse by T 2 = k a 3 where k is the same for all planets.
When Kepler stated his period law for planetary orbits based on observation, he only
noted the dependence on the larger mass of the sun. Because the mass of the sun is much
greater than the mass of the planets, his observation is an excellent approximation.
In order to demonstrate the third law we begin by rewriting Equation (25.5.6) in the form
dA
2µ = L. (25.5.7)
dt
Equation (25.5.7) can be integrated as
T
∫
orbit
2 µ dA = ∫ L dt ,
0
(25.5.8)
Area = ∫
orbit
dA = π ab , (25.5.9)
where a is the semi-major axis and b is the semi-minor axis (Figure 25.10).
25-20
Figure 25.10 Semi-major and semi-minor axis for an ellipse
Thus we have
2 µ π ab
T= . (25.5.10)
L
Squaring Equation (25.5.10) then yields
4π 2 µ 2 a 2 b2
T2 = . (25.5.11)
L2
In Appendix 25B, Equation (25.B.20) gives the angular momentum in terms of the semi-
major axis and the eccentricity. Substitution for the angular momentum into Equation
(25.5.11) yields
4π 2 µ 2 a 2 b2
T =
2
. (25.5.12)
µ Gm1 m2 a(1− ε 2 )
In Appendix 25B, Equation (25.B.17) gives the semi-minor axis which upon substitution
into Equation (25.5.12) yields
4π 2 µ 2 a 3
T2 = . (25.5.13)
µ Gm1 m2
Using Equation (25.2.1) for reduced mass, the square of the period of the orbit is
proportional to the semi-major axis cubed,
4π 2 a 3
T2 = . (25.5.14)
G(m1 + m2 )
25.7 Worked Examples
25-21
furthest from the planet. The distance of closest approach is rp (Figure 25.11). What is (i)
the speed v p of the satellite when it is closest to the planet and (ii) the speed va of the
satellite when it is furthest from the planet?
L ≡ LO ,p = LO ,a . (25.6.1)
Because ms << m p , the reduced mass µ ≅ ms and so the angular momentum condition
becomes
L = ms rp v p = ms ra va (25.6.2)
We can solve for v p in terms of the constants G , m p , ra and rp as follows. Choose zero
for the gravitational potential energy, U (r = ∞) = 0 . When the satellite is at the maximum
distance from the planet, the mechanical energy is
1 Gms mp
Ea = K a + U a = ms va 2 − . (25.6.3)
2 ra
1 Gms mp
Ep = ms v p 2 − . (25.6.4)
2 rp
25-22
therefore
1 Gms mp 1 Gms mp
E= ms v p 2 − = ms va 2 − . (25.6.6)
2 rp 2 ra
Substitute Eq. (25.6.7) into Eq. (25.6.6) and divide through by ms / 2 yields
2Gmp rp 2 2Gmp
vp −
2
= v 2−
2 p
. (25.6.8)
rp ra ra
⎛ r 2⎞ ⎛ 1 1⎞
v p 2 ⎜ 1− p2 ⎟ = 2Gmp ⎜ − ⎟ ⇒
⎝ ra ⎠ ⎝ rp ra ⎠
⎛ ra 2 − rp 2 ⎞ ⎛ ra − rp ⎞
2
vp ⎜ 2 ⎟ = 2Gm p⎜ ⎟⇒
⎝ ra ⎠ ⎝ rp ra ⎠
(25.6.9)
⎛ (r − r )(r + r ) ⎞ ⎛r −r ⎞
v p 2 ⎜ a p 2 a p ⎟ = 2Gmp ⎜ a p ⎟ ⇒
⎝ ra ⎠ ⎝ rp ra ⎠
2Gmp ra
vp = .
(ra + rp )rp
2Gmp rp
va = (rp / ra )v p = . (25.6.10)
(ra + rp )ra
Example 25.2 The Motion of the Star SO-2 around the Black Hole at the Galactic
Center
The UCLA Galactic Center Group, headed by Dr. Andrea Ghez, measured the orbits of
many stars within 0.8′′ × 0.8′′ of the galactic center. The orbits of six of those stars are
shown in Figure 25.12.
25-23
Figure 25.12 Obits of six stars near black hole at center of Milky Way galaxy.
We shall focus on the orbit of the star S0-2 with the following orbit properties given in
Table 25.13. Distances are given in astronomical units, 1au = 1.50 × 1011 m , which is the
mean distance between the earth and the sun.
4π 2 a 3
T2 = , (25.6.11)
G(m1 + m2 )
where m1 is the mass of S0-2, m2 is the mass of the black hole, and a is the semi-major
axis of the elliptic orbit of S0-2. (a) Determine the mass of the black hole that the star S0-
2 is orbiting. What is the ratio of the mass of the black hole to the solar mass? (b) What is
the speed of S0-2 at periapse (distance of closest approach to the center of the galaxy)
and apoapse (distance of furthest approach to the center of the galaxy)?
3
A.M.Ghez, et al., Stellar Orbits Around Galactic Center Black Hole, preprint arXiv:astro-ph/0306130v1,
5 June, 2003.
25-24
Solution: (a) The semi-major axis is given by
rp + ra 119.5au + 1812au
a= = = 965.8au . (25.6.12)
2 2
The mass m1 of the star S0-2 is much less than the mass m2 of the black hole, and
Equation (25.6.11) can be simplified to
4π 2 a 3
T =
2
. (25.6.14)
G m2
Solving for the mass m2 and inserting the numerical values, yields
4π 2 a 3
m2 =
GT 2
(4π 2 )(1.45 × 1014 m)3
= (25.6.15)
(6.67 × 10−11 N ⋅ m 2 ⋅ kg −2 )((15.2 yr)(3.16 × 107 s ⋅ yr -1 ))2
= 7.79 × 1034 kg.
The ratio of the mass of the black hole to the solar mass is
m2 7.79 × 1034 kg
= = 3.91× 106 . (25.6.16)
msun 1.99 × 1030 kg
The mass of black hole corresponds to nearly four million solar masses.
2Gm2 ra Gm2 ra
vp = = (25.6.17)
(ra + rp )rp arp
rp 2Gm2 rp Gm2 rp
va = vp = = , (25.6.18)
ra (ra + rp )ra ara
25-25
Gm2 ra
vp =
a rp
rp ⎛ 1812 ⎞
va = vp = ⎜ ⎟ (7.38 × 106 m ⋅s −1 ) = 4.87 × 105 m ⋅s −1 . (25.6.20)
ra ⎝ 119.5 ⎠
A particle of mass m moves in plane about a central point under an attractive central
force of magnitude F = br 3 . The magnitude of the angular momentum about the central
point is equal to L . (a) Find the effective potential energy and make sketch of effective
potential energy as a function of r . (b) Indicate on a sketch of the effective potential the
total energy for circular motion. (c) The radius of the particle’s orbit varies between r0
and 2r0 . Find r0 .
r b
U (r) = − ∫ (−br′ 3 ) dr′ = r 4
0 4
L2 L2 b
U eff (r) = 2
+ U (r) = 2
+ r4 .
2mr 2mr 4
A plot is shown in Figure 25.13a, including the potential (yellow, right-most curve), the
term L2 / 2m (green, left-most curve) and the effective potential (blue, center curve). The
horizontal scale is in units of r0 (corresponding to radius of the lowest energy circular
orbit) and the vertical scale is in units of the minimum effective potential.
b) The minimum effective potential energy is the horizontal line (red) in Figure 25.13a.
25-26
(a) (b)
Figure 25.13 (a) Effective potential energy with lowest energy state (red line), (b) higher
energy state (magenta line)
c) We are trying to determine the value of r0 such that U eff (r0 ) = U eff (2r0 ) . Thus
L2 b 4 L2 b
2
+ r0
= 2
+ (2r0 )4 .
mr0 4 m(2r0 ) 4
3 L2 1 15 4
= b r0
8 m r02 4
1 L2
r06 = .
10 mb
In the plot in Figure 25.13b, if we could move the red line up until it intersects the blue
curve at two point whose value of the radius differ by a factor of 2 , those would be the
respective values for r0 and 2r0 . A graph, showing the corresponding energy as the
horizontal magenta line, is shown in Figure 25.13b.
A space vehicle is in a circular orbit about the earth. The mass of the vehicle is
ms = 3.00 × 103 kg and the radius of the orbit is 2Re = 1.28 × 104 km . It is desired to
transfer the vehicle to a circular orbit of radius 4Re (Figure 24.14). The mass of the earth
is M e = 5.97 × 1024 kg . (a) What is the minimum energy expenditure required for the
transfer? (b) An efficient way to accomplish the transfer is to use an elliptical orbit from
point A on the inner circular orbit to a point B on the outer circular orbit (known as a
25-27
Hohmann transfer orbit). What changes in speed are required at the points of intersection,
A and B ?
Solution: (a) The mechanical energy is the sum of the kinetic and potential energies,
E = K +U
1 m M (25.6.21)
= ms v 2 − G s e .
2 Re
For a circular orbit, the orbital speed and orbital radius must be related by Newton’s
Second Law,
Fr = m ar
ms M e v2
−G = −ms ⇒ (25.6.22)
Re 2 Re
1 1 m M
ms v 2 = G s e .
2 2 Re
1 m M m M 1 m M 1
E = G s e − G s e = − G s e = U (Re ) . (25.6.23)
2 Re Re 2 Re 2
Equation (25.6.23) is one example of what is known as the Virial Theorem, in which the
energy is equal to (1/2) the potential energy for the circular orbit. In moving from a
circular orbit of radius 2Re to a circular orbit of radius 4Re , the total energy increases,
(as the energy becomes less negative). The change in energy is
25-28
ΔE = E(r = 4Re ) − E(r = 2Re )
1 m M ⎛ 1 m M ⎞
= − G s e −⎜− G s e⎟ (25.6.24)
2 4Re ⎝ 2 2Re ⎠
Gms M e
= .
8Re
1 m M 1 m M
ΔE = G s e = G s e
8 Re 4 2Re
1 (3.00 × 103 kg)(5.97 × 1024 kg)
= (6.67 × 10−11 m 3 ⋅ kg −1 ⋅s −2 ) (25.6.25)
4 (1.28 × 104 km)
= 2.3× 1010 J.
b) The satellite must increase its speed at point A in order to move to the larger orbit
radius and increase its speed again at point B to stay in the new circular orbit. Denote
the satellite speed at point A while in the circular orbit as v A, i and after the speed
increase (a “rocket burn”) as v A, f . Similarly, denote the satellite’s speed when it first
reaches point B as v B, i . Once the satellite reaches point B , it then needs to increase its
speed in order to continue in a circular orbit. Denote the speed of the satellite in the
circular orbit at point B by v B, f . The speeds v A, i and v B, f are given by Equation
(25.6.22). While the satellite is moving from point A to point B in the elliptic orbit (that
is, during the transfer, after the first burn and before the second), both mechanical energy
and angular momentum are conserved. Conservation of energy relates the speeds and
radii by
1 mm 1 mm
ms (v A, f )2 − G s e = ms (v B,i )2 − G s e . (25.6.26)
2 2Re 2 4Re
Substitution of Equation (25.6.27) into Equation (25.6.26) yields, after minor algebra,
2 G Me 1 GM e
v A, f = , v B,i = . (25.6.28)
3 Re 6 Re
25-29
1 G Me 1 G Me
v A,i = , v B, f = . (25.6.29)
2 Re 4 Re
⎛ 2 1 ⎞ G Me
Δv A = v A, f − v A,i = ⎜ − ⎟
⎝ 3 2⎠ Re
(25.6.30)
⎛ 1 1 ⎞ G Me
Δv B = v B, f − v B,i =⎜ − ⎟ .
⎝ 4 6⎠ Re
25-30
Appendix 25A Derivation of the Orbit Equation
L (1/ r 2 )
dθ = 1/2
dr . (25.A.1)
2µ ⎛ L2 G m1 m2 ⎞
⎜⎝ E − +
2µ r 2
r ⎟⎠
L du
dθ = − . (25.A.2)
2µ ⎛
1/ 2
L2 2 ⎞
⎜E− u + G m1 m2 u ⎟
⎝ 2µ ⎠
Experience in evaluating integrals suggests that we make the absolute value of the factor
multiplying u 2 inside the square root equal to unity. That is, multiplying numerator and
denominator by 2µ / L ,
du
dθ = − . (25.A.3)
( 2µ E / L − u )
1/2
2 2
+ 2( µG m1 m2 / L )u
2
As both a check and a motivation for the next steps, note that the left side dθ of Equation
(25.A.3) is dimensionless, and so the right side must be. This means that the factor of
µ G m1 m2 / L2 in the square root must have the same dimensions as u , or length −1 ; so,
define r0 ≡ L2 / µ G m1 m2 . This is of course the semilatus rectum as defined in Equation
(25.3.12), and it’s no coincidence; this is part of the “hindsight” mentioned above. The
differential equation then becomes
du
dθ = − . (25.A.4)
(2 µ E / L − u 2 + 2u / r0 )1/2
2
25-31
du
dθ = −
( 2µ E / L + 1/ r )
1/2
2
0
2
− u 2 + 2u / r0 − 1/ r0 2
du
=− (25.A.5)
( 2µ E / L + 1/ r )
1/2
2
0
2
− (u − 1/ r0 ) 2
r0 du
=− .
( )
1/2
2 µ Er0 2 / L2 + 1− (r0 u − 1)2
r0 du
dθ = − . (25.A.6)
(ε − (r0 u −1)2 )
2 1/ 2
From here, we’ll combine a few calculus steps, going immediately to the substitution
r0 u −1 = ε cosα , r0 du = −ε sin α dα , with the final result that
−ε sin α dα
dθ = − = dα , (25.A.7)
(ε − ε 2 cos 2 α )
2 1/ 2
We now integrate Eq. (25.A.7) with the very simple result that
θ = α + constant . (25.A.8)
which is our desired result, Equation (25.3.11). Note that if we chose the constant of
integration to be zero, the result would be
1 r0
r= = (25.A.10)
u 1+ ε cosθ
which is the same trajectory reflected about the “vertical” axis in Figure 25.3, indeed the
same as rotating by π .
25-32
1
u= (1− ε cosθ ) (25.A.11)
r0
suggests that the equation of motion for the one-body problem might be manipulated to
obtain a simple differential equation. That is, start from
F = µa
m1m2 ⎛ d 2r ⎛ dθ ⎞ ⎞
2
(25.A.12)
−G 2 r̂ = µ ⎜ 2 − r ⎜ ⎟ ⎟ r̂.
r ⎜⎝ dt ⎝ dt ⎠ ⎟⎠
Setting the components equal, using the constant of motion L = µr 2 (dθ / dt) and
rearranging, Eq. (25.A.12) becomes
d 2r L2 Gm1m2
µ = − . (25.A.13)
dt 2 µ r 3 r2
We now use the same substitution u = 1/ r and change the independent variable from t to
r , using the chain rule twice, since Equation (25.A.13) is a second-order equation. That
is, the first time derivative is
dr dr du dr du dθ
= = . (25.A.14)
dt du dt du dθ dt
dr 1 du Lu 2 du L
=− 2 =− , (25.A.15)
dt u dθ µ dθ µ
a very tidy result, with the variable u appearing linearly. Taking the second derivative
with respect to t ,
d 2 r d ⎛ dr ⎞ d ⎛ dr ⎞ dθ
= = . (25.A.16)
dt 2 dt ⎜⎝ dt ⎟⎠ dθ ⎜⎝ dt ⎟⎠ dt
Now substitute Eq. (25.A.15) into Eq. (25.A.16) with the result that
d 2r d 2u ⎛ 2 L2 ⎞
= − u . (25.A.17)
dt 2 dθ 2 ⎜⎝ µ 2 ⎟⎠
25-33
d 2u 2 L2 L2 3
− u = u − Gm1m2 u 2 . (25.A.18)
dθ 2 µ µ
d 2u µGm1m2
− 2 =u− . (25.A.19)
dθ L2
uH = Acos(θ − θ 0 ) , (25.A.21)
where A and θ 0 are constants determined by the form of the orbit. The expression in
Equation (25.A.20) is the inhomogeneous solution and represents a circular orbit. The
expression in Equation (25.A.21) is the homogeneous solution (as hinted by the
subscript) and must have two independent constants. We can readily identify 1/ u0 as the
semilatus rectum r0 , with the result that
1
u = u0 + uH =
r0
(1+ r0 A(θ − θ0 )) ⇒
(25.A.22)
1 r0
r= = .
u 1+ r0 A(θ − θ 0 )
Choosing the product r0 A to be the eccentricity ε and θ 0 = π (much as was done leading
to Equation (25.A.9) above), Equation (25.A.9) is reproduced.
25-34
Appendix 25B Properties of an Elliptical Orbit
We now consider the special case of an elliptical orbit. Choose coordinates with the
central point located at one focal point and coordinates (r,θ ) for the position of the
single body (Figure 25B.1a). In Figure 25B.1b, let a denote the semi-major axis, b
denote the semi-minor axis and x0 denote the distance from the center of the ellipse to
the origin of our coordinate system.
(a) (b)
Figure 25B.1 (a) Coordinate system for elliptic orbit, (b) semi-major axis
r0
r(θ ) = . (25.B.1)
1− ε cosθ
The major axis A = 2a is given by
A = 2 a = ra + rp . (25.B.2)
r0
ra = r(θ = 0) = , (25.B.3)
1− ε
r0
rp = r(θ = π ) = . (25.B.4)
1+ ε
25-35
Figure 25B.2 shows the distances of nearest and furthest approach.
1⎛ r r ⎞ r
a= ⎜ 0 + 0 ⎟= 0 2 . (25.B.5)
2 ⎝ 1− ε 1+ ε ⎠ 1− ε
The semilatus rectum r0 can be re-expressed in terms of the semi-major axis and the
eccentricity,
r0 = a(1− ε 2 ) . (25.B.6)
We can now express the distance of nearest approach, Equation (25.B.4), in terms of the
semi-major axis and the eccentricity,
r0 a(1− ε 2 )
rp = = = a(1− ε ) . (25.B.7)
1+ ε 1+ ε
r0 a(1− ε 2 )
ra = = = a(1+ ε ) . (25.B.8)
1− ε 1− ε
From Figure 25B.3a, the distance from a focus point to the center of the ellipse is
x0 = a − rp . (25.B.9)
25-36
(a) (b)
Figure 25B.3 Location of the center of the ellipse and semi-minor axis.
x0 = a − a(1− ε ) = ε a. (25.B.10)
b = (rb 2 − x0 2 ) , (25.B.11)
where
r0
rb = . (25.B.12)
1− ε cosθ b
We can rewrite Eq. (25.B.12) as
rb − rb ε cosθb = r0 . (25.B.13)
x0 = rb cosθb , (25.B.14)
rb = r0 + ε x0 . (25.B.15)
25-37
The fact that rb = a is a well-known property of an ellipse reflected in the geometric
construction, that the sum of the distances from the two foci to any point on the ellipse is
a constant. We can now determine the semi-minor axis b by substituting Eq. (25.B.16)
into Eq. (25.B.11) yielding
b= (rb
2
− x0 2 ) = a 2 − ε 2a 2 = a 1− ε 2 . (25.B.17)
We shall now express the parameters a , b and x0 in terms of the constants of the motion
L , E , µ , m1 and m2 . Using our results for r0 and ε from Equations (25.3.13) and
(25.3.14) we have for the semi-major axis
L2 1
a=
µ Gm1 m2 (1− (1+ 2 E L / µ (G m1 m2 )2 ))
2
. (25.B.18)
G m1 m2
=−
2E
G m1 m2
E=− . (25.B.19)
2a
Thus, from Equations (25.3.14), (25.B.10), and (25.B.18), the distance from the center of
the ellipse to the focal point is
x0 = ε a = −
G m1 m2
2E
(1 + 2E L / µ (G m m ) ) ,
2
1 2
2
(25.B.22)
a result we will return to later. We can substitute Eq. (25.B.21) for 1− ε 2 into Eq.
(25.B.17), and determine that the semi-minor axis is
25-38
b = aL2 / µ Gm1 m2 . (25.B.23)
We can now substitute Eq. (25.B.18) for a into Eq. (25.B.23), yielding
G m1 m2 1
b = aL2 / µ Gm1 m2 = L − / µ Gm1 m2 = L − . (25.B.24)
2E 2µ E
At nearest approach, the velocity vector is tangent to the orbit (Figure 25B.4), so the
magnitude of the angular momentum is
L = µrp v p , (25.B.25)
and the speed at nearest approach is
v p = L / µrp . (25.B.26)
Using Equation (25.B.20) for the angular momentum and Equation (25.B.7) for rp ,
Equation (25.B.26) becomes
25-39
Appendix 25C Analytic Geometric Properties of Ellipses
Consider Equation (25.3.20), and for now take ε < 1 , so that the equation is that of an
ellipse. We shall now show that we can write it as
(x − x0 )2 y 2
+ 2 = 1, (25.C.1)
a2 b
where the ellipse has axes parallel to the x - and y -coordinate axes, center at (x0 , 0) ,
semi-major axis a and semi-minor axis b . We begin by rewriting Equation (25.3.20) as
2ε r0 y2 r02
x2 − x + = . (25.C.2)
1− ε 2 1− ε 2 1− ε 2
We next complete the square,
The last expression in (25.C.3) is the equation of an ellipse with semi-major axis
r0
a= , (25.C.4)
1− ε 2
semi-minor axis
r0
b= = a 1− ε 2 , (25.C.5)
1− ε 2
and center at
ε r0
x0 = = εa , (25.C.6)
(1− ε 2 )
25-40
MIT OpenCourseWare
https://ocw.mit.edu
For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: https://ocw.mit.edu/terms.