DWF Dialogue Guide
DWF Dialogue Guide
DWF Dialogue Guide
CAMPAIGN GUIDE
In this package, you have received:
2. Movie Postcards
We have enclosed at least 50 movie postcards (more if you requested them). These movie postcards contain ordering information on the back. Place movie postcards on the seats of your audience members before the doors open. After the screening, draw peoples attention to the postcards and announce that people can order the film on our website. We hope you will encourage people to buy the film to share with their family and friends. Thank you!
____
____
Blogger Take notes on the discussion by hand or on a laptop; write a reflection piece on the event and email to Tracy Wells at [email protected] Photographer Take photographs at the event; email 2-3 of the best photos to Tracy Wells at [email protected] Usher One Pass out response cards for people to share their own stories and reflections. These will be posted on our website. You can place these response cards on peoples seats before the doors open. (You will need to photocopy the template for the response cards in the campaign package and bring golf pencils). After the event, please type up these responses and email addresses and email to Tracy Wells at [email protected] Usher Two Pass out movie postcards to each audience member with information on how to order the film and curriculum. You can place these movie postcards on peoples seats before the doors open. (Postcards are included in the campaign package) Runner If mics are necessary, the runner will pass the wireless microphone to audience members during the discussion session after the screening.
Welcome! We are humbled and grateful to share our film with you and wish we could thank you in person. The journey to make this film began when a twenty-year-old college student faced a choice in the aftermath of Sept. 11, 2001: to turn away from the confusion and fear outside her bedroom window or to confront the whirlwind and leap into it. She leapt. The stories she found inspired a growing circle of friends to devote their time and talent toward something bigger than any of us. We were all in our twenties, working for free. We lived on chocolate, maxed out credit cards, and somehow raised enough in tiny donations to make Divided We Fall. Our story spread through word-of-mouth and propelled us on a two-year tour that brought us to tonight. Tonight, you are joining thousands of people in 50 cities across the United States in a dialogue about racism and religion, fear and forgiveness, who we are as a nation and who we want to be. As we remember the seven-year anniversary of Sept. 11, 2001, we put the film in your hands as a testament to what is possible when people reach deep into hate and violence in order to transform it. May tonight open a space for renewal and healing. May it allow us to honor those who died on Sept. 11 and its ongoing aftermath. And may it inspire you to tell your own untold stories.
We would like to call your attention to two things placed on your seats. First, the movie postcards. Divided We Fall on DVD is now available for purchase on the films website, and the ordering info is on the back of these movie postcards. We encourage you to order the film to share with your friends and family. Second, the response cards. Throughout our dialogue tonight, we invite you to write down your own stories and reflections on these response cards. These will be posted on the films website alongside responses from around the country. You can add your email address on these cards if you want to stay in touch with the filmmakers.
II. Setting Tone and Ground Rules At the beginning of your dialogue, introduce any community members or experts in the audience and then set a few ground rules. Please read ideas about setting ground rules in Appendix A of this packet. Each dialogue will have different schedules so facilitators must use judgment about how much time to spend on setting tone and guidelines. Something as simple as lighting a candle and inviting people to be respectful, to listen, and to avoid judging other speakers while the candle is burning can be a short effective way to invite people to be at their best in the dialogue process. Some examples include: Our shared commitment is to learn from each other. Acknowledge and value peoples differences in their backgrounds, values, and life experiences. Trust that people are always doing the best they can. Speak your discomfort. Maintain confidentiality. What other guidelines would you like to add?
Suggested Activity 1: Inviting Shared Healing and Hope Through Appreciative Inquiry in Dyads
Appreciative inquiry is a form of reflection, storytelling, and problem solving that invites people to identify and share peak and positive experiences in their past that help to create imagination, bonds, energy, and connections for change in the future. Here are some questions to try. Invite people to pick a partner, preferably someone he or she doesnt know, then read one of the questions below and give the dyads 5-10 minutes to share a story.
(1) Name a moment when you have you been seen as an outsider. How did you respond? Now name a moment when you saw someone as an outsider. How did you respond? (2) What surprised or upset you in the film? What made you the most hopeful? (3) Whose story in the film resonated with you? What would you like to say to them? (4) When have you been at your best in taking some small or big step to stop bias and hate, and what helped you to be effective in taking action?
After the dyads, invite volunteers to share their partners' stories and what they learned helped people to take action. As a facilitator, take notes on the themes and summarize them at the end to create a group theory on successful ways to take action.
(1) When did you feeling a visceral identification with something or someone in the film? (2) When did you feel the most hopeful when watching the film? Where in your body did you feel the relief, hope, or some calm? (Invite them to notice what happens in their stomach, chest, and throat.) (3) When did you feel anger or pain when watching the film? What did you feel in your body? (Invite them to notice any changes in sensation in their bodies.) (4) Let yourself remember in your body the tense and relaxed moments and alternate between the two to explore what you learned though this somatic inquiry. (5) What is your body telling you about the way you experienced the film and the issues it presents?
Now invite people to find a partner to share what they learned about through this somatic inquiry and reflection for 10 to 15 minutes. (Some people may not have any visceral reactions and for the purposes of this discussion, this is okay). Bring the group together and invite people to share with a group.
Suggested Activity 3: Community Dialogue through Reflections, Questions, and Exchanges about Content Issues in the Film
Watch the film ahead of time and think about some questions that you can raise to discuss these themes in the film. If you are connected with a community member or an expert, work with them ahead of time on questions for the audience and topics for discussion. Here are suggested topics: Valaries Life and Journey: Courage and Inspiration Untold Stories and What They Tell Us about Who Constructs History American Identity: Who Counts as American? National Security and Civil Rights Sikh Americans and Religious Pluralism Stereotyping, Profiling, Discrimination, and Hate Violence The Way Forward: Storytelling, Truth-telling, Forgiveness, and Reconciliation
[VK2]
1. Within one week of your event, please send one email with the following items to our communications director Tracy Wells at [email protected]:
2-3 Photographs please send us your favorite photos from your event; we will post these alongside your reflection piece and give credit to the photographer. Reflection, Your City Name a word document with this title that contains a reflection piece about your screening and dialogue (from one paragraph to one page). This reflection piece will be posted on our blog, so please include the highlights of your dialogue and anything you want to share about your experience Response Cards, Your City Name a word document with this title that contains the information people put on their response cards. Please include all that people wrote on the response cards, including demographic info. Email Addresses, Your City Name a word document with this title that lists peoples email addresses from their response cards. We will add these email addresses to our newsletter list.
2. After your screening, please mail the DVD screener back to us. We will then be able to mail you the official DVD of the film upon its release in October (sent free to those who provided the full screening fee):
New Moon Productions 236 Fifth Ave, Suite B Venice, CA 90291
6. 7. 8.
Instead of invalidating somebody else's story with your own spin on their experience, share your own story and experience. The goal is not to agree -- it is about hearing and exploring divergent perspectives. Be conscious of body language and nonverbal responses -- they can be as disrespectful as words.
It is also important to set a ground rule for how participation will be managed. Do you prefer for participants to raise their hands and be called on, or for people to speak freely? Remember that some people -- especially those who tend to be introverted -- need more time to process thoughts and speak; so the latter option may exclude them from the discussion. Still, the formal process of raising hands to be recognized may detract from the collective atmosphere needed to discuss multicultural issues. Strategies and Notes 1. It is very helpful to post the ground rules somewhere visible during the entire course of a class or workshop. Some teachers and facilitators who are with a certain group over an extended period of time will bring the list of ground rules (on news print or some other transportable medium) back to the group for every session or class period. They can then refer back to the list when they sense that participants are failing to sufficiently follow one or more of the items. 2. Challenge the participants on the ground rules early and often. If you do not set a tone of strict adherence to the items early in the process, it may become impossible to enforce them later. 3. If you are using more than two or three ground rules, try focusing on particular items during appropriate activities or discussions. For example, if you are facilitating a discussion in a large group, state before the discussion starts that you would like to focus on active listening. Challenge participants to refrain from any side discussions. The same can be done if you are facilitating an experiential activity, by introducing it as a "silent" activity. 4. You must MODEL these ground rules in your own participation. This is especially true for an item such as #2 (speak from your own experience). Be sure that your own language reflects ownership and responsibility by using as many "I" and "me" statements as possible. 5. If a particular ground rule is routinely broken, bounce it back to the participants. A fruitful discussion can often arise from a close examination of why the participants are not adhering to particular items. 6. Revisit the ground rules occasionally, and if time allows, ask whether the participants would like to add any new items. Rethinking Ground Rules If a goal of multicultural education is to challenge current structures and assumptions about educational engagement, we must look closely at all guidelines we use in our classes and workshops, asking ourselves who
they support and who, if anybody, they privilege. As such, many multicultural educators and facilitators have begun to rethink the idea of ground rules and ways they are currently implemented. Recent critical analysis of common ground rules have resulted in a collective reconsideration of their role. This is because too often, ground rules that are put in place, whether by an educator/facilitator or by participants, privilege the already-privileged groups in a given dialogue. For example, in a dialogue about race, white participants will often support ground rules meant to keep anger out of the discussion--ground rules focused on a Eurocentric idea of respect. When we consider who is protected by ground rules like "attack the idea, not the person," it becomes apparent that, intentionally or not, they protect the participants representing privileged groups. While I do not advocate dropping ground rules altogether, I do support the idea of seriously studying these issues and the possible ramifications of ground rules that might ultimately support the status quo by providing safety and comfort for those who, for the sake of their own learning, most desperately need to be made to feel uncomfortable. Consider opening this conversation within your class or workshop or among colleagues, and challenge yourself to make sure that the discussions and dialogues you are setting up do not further oppress historically oppressed people. Source: Awareness Activities EdChange Multicultural Pavilion http://www.edchange.org/multicultural/activities/groundrules.html.