8624 Assignment No 1 Solutions by Mohammad Ali Asif
8624 Assignment No 1 Solutions by Mohammad Ali Asif
8624 Assignment No 1 Solutions by Mohammad Ali Asif
ISLAMABAD
ASSIGNMENT NO. 01
Secondary Education:
Secondary education typically refers to the education that students receive during their teenage
years, usually between the ages of 12 to 18 years old. In most countries, secondary education is
divided into two main stages: lower secondary education and upper secondary education.
Lower secondary education, also known as junior high school, middle school or lower secondary
school, typically covers grades 6-8 or 7-9, depending on the country. This stage of education
focuses on building a strong foundation of academic knowledge and skills in subjects such as
mathematics, science, social studies, and language arts.
Upper secondary education, also known as high school or senior secondary school, typically covers
grades 9-12 or 10-12, depending on the country. This stage of education is designed to prepare
students for higher education, vocational training, or employment by providing them with a more
specialized education in areas such as literature, social sciences, sciences, arts, or technical and
vocational education and training (TVET).
In many countries, secondary education is mandatory and provided free of charge by the
government. However, in some countries, there are private schools that provide secondary
education, which may require tuition fees to be paid.
Q.2. What are the responsibilities of Ministry of education in creating policies, plan and
availability of education in Pakistan?
The Ministry of Education in Pakistan is responsible for creating policies and plans to promote
and provide quality education to all citizens in the country. Some of the specific responsibilities
of the Ministry of Education include:
1. Developing national education policies: The Ministry of Education is responsible for
developing national education policies and strategies that promote access to quality
education for all citizens. The policies and strategies should be based on research and
evidence, and should be responsive to the needs and aspirations of the diverse communities
across the country.
2. Ensuring access to education: The Ministry of Education is responsible for ensuring that
every child in Pakistan has access to education, regardless of their gender, socioeconomic
status, or location. The Ministry should work to increase the number of schools in
underserved areas, and promote the enrollment of girls and other marginalized groups.
3. Improving the quality of education: The Ministry of Education is responsible for ensuring
that the quality of education in Pakistan is improved. This includes promoting effective
teaching practices, developing a relevant curriculum, providing adequate learning
resources, and monitoring the quality of education through regular assessment and
evaluation.
4. Providing teacher training and professional development: The Ministry of Education is
responsible for providing teachers with adequate training and professional development
opportunities, to ensure that they are equipped with the necessary knowledge and skills to
teach effectively.
5. Ensuring the availability of education funding: The Ministry of Education is responsible
for ensuring that adequate funding is available for the education sector. This includes
advocating for increased public funding, and seeking out partnerships with international
organizations and other donors to supplement the government's resources.
6. Promoting research and innovation: The Ministry of Education is responsible for
promoting research and innovation in the education sector, to ensure that the policies and
strategies developed are evidence-based and responsive to changing needs.
In summary, the Ministry of Education in Pakistan is responsible for developing policies,
plans, and strategies that promote access to quality education for all citizens, and for ensuring
that the necessary resources and support are available to achieve these goals.
Importance of SSE
Secondary School Education (SSE) is not only about providing students with academic knowledge
and skills but also instilling values that shape their character and prepare them to be responsible
citizens in society. Some of the values that SSE promotes include:
1. Preparation for higher education: SSE provides the foundation for further education and
specializations in specific fields. The knowledge and skills learned during secondary
school are essential for students who wish to continue their studies in higher education
institutions.
2. Development of critical thinking and problem-solving skills: SSE helps students develop
critical thinking, problem-solving, and analytical skills that are essential for success in life.
Students learn to think logically, analyze information, and make informed decisions.
3. Personal growth and development: SSE provides opportunities for students to grow and
develop personally, socially, and emotionally. Students learn to communicate effectively,
work collaboratively, and develop leadership skills.
4. Preparation for the workforce: SSE provides students with the necessary knowledge and
skills to enter the workforce. Many careers require at least a secondary school education,
and some may require specific subjects or skills.
5. Civic engagement and responsible citizenship: SSE helps students develop a sense of civic
responsibility and engage in their communities. Students learn about their rights and
responsibilities as citizens, as well as the importance of participation in the democratic
process.
6. Responsibility: SSE helps students develop a sense of responsibility towards themselves,
their families, and their communities. Through various activities and projects, students
learn to take responsibility for their actions, choices, and decisions.
7. Respect: SSE promotes respect for oneself, others, and the environment. Students learn to
respect diversity and appreciate different cultures, beliefs, and perspectives.
8. Ethics and Morals: SSE instills ethical and moral values such as honesty, integrity, fairness,
and empathy. Students learn to distinguish between right and wrong and develop a sense
of empathy towards others.
9. Critical thinking and problem-solving: SSE emphasizes critical thinking and problem-
solving skills, enabling students to analyze complex situations and make informed
decisions.
10. Teamwork and Collaboration: SSE encourages students to work collaboratively with
others, teaching them valuable skills such as communication, leadership, and conflict
resolution.
11. Perseverance and Resilience: SSE helps students develop perseverance and resilience by
teaching them to overcome challenges and setbacks, and to never give up on their goals.
12. Creativity and Innovation: SSE encourages students to think creatively and innovatively,
promoting originality and new ideas.
In summary, SSE is important for preparing students for higher education, developing critical
thinking and problem-solving skills, personal growth and development, preparation for the
workforce, and civic engagement and responsible citizenship. A strong SSE system is crucial for
building a knowledgeable and skilled workforce, promoting economic growth, and creating
responsible citizens who can contribute to the betterment of society.
Ministry of Education:
The Ministry of Federal Education and Professional Training is the main governing body
responsible for overseeing education in Pakistan. It is a federal ministry, meaning it is
responsible for education policies and programs across the entire country.
The Ministry of Federal Education and Professional Training is responsible for a wide range of
activities related to education in Pakistan. Some of its key responsibilities include:
1. Formulating education policies and strategies: The Ministry is responsible for
formulating policies and strategies for education in Pakistan, from primary to higher
education levels.
2. Curriculum development: The Ministry is responsible for developing national curricula
for primary, secondary, and higher education.
3. Monitoring and evaluation: The Ministry monitors and evaluates the implementation of
education policies, programs, and projects in the country.
4. Quality assurance: The Ministry is responsible for ensuring the quality of education
across the country and developing standards for school accreditation.
5. Teacher training: The Ministry is responsible for providing teacher training and
professional development programs to improve the quality of education.
6. Coordination with provincial education departments: The Ministry works closely with
provincial education departments to implement education policies and programs at the
provincial level.
7. International collaboration: The Ministry also collaborates with international
organizations and other countries to promote education and research.
In summary, the Ministry of Federal Education and Professional Training is responsible for
overseeing and implementing education policies and programs in Pakistan. Its key
responsibilities include formulating policies and strategies, curriculum development, monitoring
and evaluation, quality assurance, teacher training, coordination with provincial education
departments, and international collaboration.
Curriculum Wing
The Curriculum Wing in Pakistan has a relatively long history, with the development and
revision of national curricula dating back several decades.
In the early years of Pakistan's history, the education system was primarily based on the British
model, with a strong emphasis on the study of English language and literature. The first national
curriculum was developed in 1972, shortly after the country gained independence. The
curriculum was largely focused on the traditional academic subjects of mathematics, science,
social studies, and languages, and was intended to provide a solid foundation for higher
education.
In the years that followed, the Curriculum Wing continued to revise and update the national
curriculum in response to changing needs and priorities. One major revision took place in 1998,
when a new national curriculum was introduced that was more comprehensive and integrated,
with an emphasis on active learning, critical thinking, and problem-solving.
In 2006, the Curriculum Wing introduced a new curriculum for primary education that was
designed to be more child-centered and based on the principles of activity-based learning. The
new curriculum was intended to help students develop a deeper understanding of key concepts,
rather than simply memorizing information.
In recent years, the Curriculum Wing has continued to work on revising and updating the
national curriculum, with a focus on improving its quality and relevance. The aim is to develop a
curriculum that is aligned with the needs of the country and the challenges of the 21st century,
and that prepares students for a rapidly changing world.
Overall, the history of the Curriculum Wing in Pakistan reflects a commitment to continuous
improvement and innovation in education, with a focus on meeting the needs of students and
society as a whole.
The quality of education, especially at the school level, has become a serious problem in the era
of globalization. Due to lack of human and material resources and their underutilization, poor
planning, poor implementation and weak monitoring results in poor quality of education in
developing countries like Pakistan. In connection with these factors, there are problems with the
basic elements of the goals of the educational process, the curriculum, the methodology of teaching
and assessment and evaluation. Assessment and evaluation is perhaps central in the sense that it is
closely linked to measuring the quality of learning outcomes and providing feedback to the main
actors of the educational process, students and teachers. The improvement of the education system,
especially the curriculum and educational strategies, is carried out on the basis of the feedback
provided by the assessment. Although assessment may not be a panacea for all ills, it can certainly
be used to improve the quality of education by conducting it effectively and providing timely
feedback to stakeholders. The evaluation process is basically subordinate to the overall system of
education and takes place at the end of the cycle, which includes the definition of goals, the
selection of content, the learning experience provided to students. However, in reality, the
assessment system has completely taken over the educational process and controls all other
activities of the educational process. Instead of evaluating what we teach, are we teaching what
we have processed?
That's the whole crux of the problem. Currently eight BISEs are working in Punjab, each at
Divisional/Regional level; another BISE is on the way to be established in Sahiwal. There is no
denying the fact that there have been some reforms at the BISE level in Punjab in the last few
years. For example, the weightage of purely essay or subjective type questions has been reduced
and a balance has been ensured between objective and subjective type questions. Consequently,
MCQs (30pc), short answer (40pc), and essay-type items (30pc) are included in the examination
papers administered by all boards in the Punjab in various subjects at secondary school and higher
secondary school examination. However, there is still a need for further improvement. Problems
and issues arise at the stage of paper construction and marking. When designing various tests,
emphasis is still placed on lower cognitive levels - knowledge and understanding. Higher cognitive
skills such as problem solving and analytical skills are rarely affected. More than 50 percent of the
questions assess students' recall or mere rote memorization, which is one of the main reasons for
the low quality of education and its end product. Many times students who achieve very good or
excellent grades in BISE at secondary or upper secondary level cannot apply the knowledge and
skills learned in the classroom to real life situations. This examination system cannot truly assess
the learning outcomes envisaged in the National Curriculum. At secondary and upper secondary
level and across all disciplines, the situation is almost similar. To improve question paper
construction, training was provided to paper makers and subject coordinators in two different
batches for secondary and upper secondary examiners. During the training, it was surprising to
find that the founders and coordinators of the paper show a lot of resistance and are not ready to
accept new ideas and rules and procedures for building quality papers.
They relied on their intuitive knowledge regarding the quality of the items, especially the MCQs.
With regard to the above-mentioned unsatisfactory situation and in connection with the
examination of students' academic results in accordance with the National Curriculum, it is
necessary to introduce further reforms to ensure the quality of questionnaires and evaluation
mechanisms. The following recommendations may be helpful to bring about a positive change in
this regard: BISE must mark the internal or continuous assessment of students by their teachers at
school/college level with their performance in the final examination conducted by BISE at HSC
and HSSC levels.
The government should establish a development and reporting body that should be responsible for
the ongoing training of coordinators, paper preparers and examiners in the development and
analysis of test items, and develop guidelines for the assessment of answer sheets by
assessors/examiners. Teachers with the required subject expertise, assessment skills, especially
test preparation and result analysis should be appointed to this body through a high-powered
selection committee. Occasional training workshops for paper setters do not serve to increase the
quality of papers; training should be an ongoing activity of BISE.
The construction of good papers revolves around the guidance of the curriculum, knowledge of
the rules and principles for the construction of tests and the skillful application of all these rules.
The aforementioned body should involve experts in assessment and psychometrics to provide
ongoing training to paper makers as well as analysis of results to provide feedback to individuals
and schools to improve their future performance. There is a research cell in every BISE which has
either not been established or failed to achieve the desired objectives of conducting research and
providing insight to the BISE to improve the assessment system. The newly proposed body should
acquire this role. It should also organize training workshops for coordinators, paper makers and
examiners in various subjects at secondary and higher secondary level. The current weightage
given to MCQ, short answer and essay type is good but the need of the class is to include more
questions which can assess the higher cognitive abilities of the student. A context-sensitive
question should be set to the pattern of O and A levels. Unnecessarily long questions should be
avoided; instead, the emphasis should be on assessing problem solving, analytical and reasoning
skills. The author is Dean, Faculty of Education and University of the Punjab, Lahore and member
of the Punjab Examination Reforms Task Force. Attempts at reform are discussed under eight
categories: syllabus revision and revision; increased frequency of public examinations;
introduction of internal evaluation; development of question banks; transition to a rating system;
semesterization; streamlining the bureaucracy of public examinations and the creation of
autonomous universities. Most of the impetus for reforming the examination system came from
the availability of Western experts at very low cost to India and from admiration for American and
British practices among Indian higher education authorities. The failure of most reforms provides
a salutary lesson when it comes to the education loan for reform.
THE END