Ca SBR 16400
Ca SBR 16400
Ca SBR 16400
*P3a. Description:
Statistical Research, Inc. (SRI) discovered this site during the course of an intensive pedestrian survey whose goal was to
conclusively define the current boundaries of site CA-SBR-4969 (cf. Becker et al. n.d.). This site is a small, light density lithic
scatter of basalt flaking debris and one basalt lithic reduction locus on moderately formed desert pavement. A total of 53 core
reduction flakes and 12 indeterminate flakes were observed. The desert pavement has been affected by vehicle traffic (broken
flakes, wheel ruts, tank tracks) and military activities. No tools, diagnostics or soil depth was observed. Rubifaction analysis was
conducted using samples taken from debitage and natural cobbles from the site.
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none.")
Becker, Ken, Scott Kremkau, Patrick Stanton, Steven D. Shelley, Dean Duryea, Matthew Hyland, Jeff Homburg, and Mark Q. Sutton
n.d. Preliminary Report on a NHPA Section 110 Survey in the L1, M1, M2, K2, LF7, LF8, and LF9 Training Areas on Fort Irwin, San
Bernardino County, California. Report in preparation. Statistical Research, Inc., Redlands, California.
*Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure, and Object Record
Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record
Artifact Record Photograph Record Other (List):
Reliability of Determination: High Medium Low Explain: Use of presence/ absence of artifacts, and desert
pavement land formation to find site boundaries
Limitations: Restricted access Paved/built over Site limits incompletely defined Disturbances Vegetation
Other (Explain):
A2. Depth: None Unknown Method of Determination: no cultural subsurface, all surface artifacts
*A3. Human Remains: Present Absent Possible Unknown (Explain): No cultural subsurface observed
Artifact Concentration 1 (PD 8017) - a basalt lithic reduction locus consisting of 25 basalt core reduction flakes in a 1.5 x 1 m
area. Personnel from SRI did not record any cores or tools. Rubifaction samples were taken from the area.
A13. Interpretations:
This site is the result of prehistoric desert pavement surface quarrying common in the area and within the Mojave Desert region
at large. Given the presence of lithic core reduction flakes and the absence of biface reduction flakes and groundstone (both of
the latter may indicate intensive occupation of a site). The evidence suggests that this site was intermittently and briefly occupied
for quarrying only. Rubifaction studies may eventually elucidate better relative dates for sites such as these, but currently, given
the lack of subsurface cultural deposits and diagnostics, as well as a brief and sporadic site occupation, SRI argues that this site
does meet any of the criteria of the NRHP, specifically criterion D. Most, if not all, of the data potential for this site was exploited
during its initial recording. SRI recommends that this site is not eligible for listing on the NRHP.
A14. Remarks:
A15. References (Documents, informants, maps, and other references):
A16. Photographs: See Photograph Record
Digital photos archived on Microsoft SharePoint, hosted by Ft. Irwin Intranet, and accessible via Directorate of Public Works, Ft.
Irwin, CA
complete cortex - 0
partial cortex (3-8 cm) - 6
no cortex (2-6 cm) - 6
Rubifaction Samples:
1 basalt core reduction flake, partial cortex (4-10 cm), Artifact Concentration 1 - 5 YR 5/4
1 basalt core reduction flake, no cortex (4-8 cm), Artifact Concentration 1 - 5 YR 5/4
1 basalt core reduction flake, complete cortex (5-7 cm) - 5 YR 4/3
This site consists of a surface scatter of lithic debitage and one reduction locus (Artifact Concentration 1). Due to the paucity of
material remains, lack of diversity in the observed assemblage and features, as well as damage to the surface of the site from
military vehicles and exercises, SRI contends that the data potential of this site is limited. The potential information from this site
was extracted during the present site recordation and in-field analysis. Therefore SRI recommends that this site lacks the potential
for future scientific contributions under criterion D of the NRHP, such that the site is not eligible for listing on the NRHP.