Rockport Phase2 GMP
Rockport Phase2 GMP
Rockport Phase2 GMP
Approval Comments:
FOR INFORMATION:
INTRODUCTION
The second phase of management planning for the Rockport Property establishes
long-range action goals for each of the management zones defined in the “General
Management Plan” (GMP). For each management zone in the plan, action goals are
recommended that address the following categories:
• Natural Resources
• Historic/Cultural Resources
• Recreation Opportunities
• Education/Interpretation Opportunities
• Management Focus
• Visitor Experience
• Development
3. The deep water port is unique to the northeast shoreline, and is a major
attraction for visitors and those seeking deep water access for launching boats.
4. Provision of boat access to Lake Huron for the public and the Chippewa tribe
fishing fleet.
5. It is located within the Lake Huron Flyway (State and Federal agencies use the
bird census data from this area as a litmus test of the health of Lake Huron and
the shoreline environment).
7. Sinkholes, karst features, and dramatic land forms are found in Rockport, which
are educational and of interest to geologists, botanists, and recreational divers.
8. Unique natural features, such as old growth white pines, and cobble beach, and
the prevalence of fens, which tend to be located in the northern portion of the
property.
10. Proximity and relationship to the Besser Natural Area that contains a sandy
beach, rare along the typically cobbled Lake Huron shoreline, and sensitive
natural features.
In concert with this analysis of Rockport’s identity and significance, the Planning Team,
with stakeholder and public input, established appropriate Management Zones and their
extent of influence on the property. From a pallet of nine standard zones, four were
applied to Rockport. While the full descriptions of these zones are included in the Phase
1 document, a condensed review of the Management Zones follows:
ο Primitive Zone reflects a desired condition that emphasizes the natural resources. It
is managed to only allow dispersed and low frequency use for low impact
recreational purposes. The Primitive Zone includes approximately 1,645 acres, or
39%, of Rockport land. The zone covers: Land that contains sensitive wetland areas,
and sensitive or undisturbed forested land; the northern and southern portions of
Rockport; the Besser Natural Area; and, land on Middle Island.
ο Natural Resource Recreation Zone permits active recreation with moderate to high
density of use conducted in a natural setting. At 49%, or 2,040 acre, the Natural
Resource Recreation (NRR) Zone comprises the greatest amount of Rockport land
area. The designation was applied due to the resources contained within the land,
and the potential uses for these resources. Access for exploration of the sinkholes,
the potential for designated rustic camping, as well as higher-intensity uses of the
trails is also facilitated by the NRR designation.
ο Developed Recreation Zone provides for active recreation with high density of use
conducted in areas not designated for natural resource significance. Approximately
560 acres, or 13%, of Rockport is zoned Developed Recreation. Land in this zone
contains largely that which is currently disturbed, including the quarry and port. The
port is shared with many users, including the Thunder Bay National Marine
Sanctuary and the Chippewa Tribe. In a regional context, Rockport is the central hub
where development can be encouraged while Negwegon State Park and
Thompson’s Harbor State Park retain their undeveloped, natural status.
ο Cultural Landscape Zone addresses the overall setting in which is found not only
historic structures, but also non-structural evidence of the traditions, beliefs,
practices, lifeways, arts, crafts and social institutions of any community.
Approximately 288 acres, or 6.8%, of Rockport is covered by the overlay, which
applies to the eastern coastline of the Developed Recreation Zone and the Besser
Natural Area. During the limestone quarry’s operation, approximately 1927 to 1958,
the land in this zone was occupied by settlement formed by quarry workers and their
families. Remnants of this once vibrant community can be found there today.
In addition, to the Management Zones, the GMP recommends that other aspects of the
property be considered:
ο Regional Consideration. The planning for the Rockport Property was performed in
conjunction with the planning for Thompson’s Harbor State Park and Negwegon
State Park. The planning effort, supported by a consensus of the Planning Team,
resulted in the following concept: Rockport would be established as the central “hub”
of the three sites, allowing Negwegon and Thompson’s Harbor to remain in a
relatively undisturbed, natural state.
ο Access and Parking. Current access to the Rockport Property is by Rockport Road,
from US-23. This Plan considers two additional points of entry, both would include
small parking areas: County Line Road (a central point of access that could facilitate
easier access to the sink holes); and access from the north (adjacent to the Besser
Natural Area).
ο Camping. The highly modified quarry area, in general, may offer opportunities for
more extensive development with low resource impacts. The quarry also offers
other recreational opportunities and any camping development would be respectful
of other uses. Designated rustic camping has potential in the Natural Resource
Recreation zone.
ο Future Purchases. Part of the DNRE’s mission is to acquire lands with unique
natural, cultural and historic resources for the purposes of public recreation and
education. The Natural Resources Commission approved a dedicated boundary for
Rockport in 2004. The Planning Team’s recommendation for expanding the project
boundary includes acquiring additional frontage along East Grand Lake Road, and
all remaining ownership of Middle Island. Land within the dedicated boundary would
be a priority purchase for the DNRE, should the opportunity to purchase and funding
become available. Major land purchases would prompt an amendment to the GMP.
Rockport Property
Acronyms used:
• RD Recreation Division
• FMD Forest Management Division
• NAC NRTH Advisory Committee
• METD Marketing, Education, and Technology Division
• MNFI Michigan Natural Features Inventory
• TBNMS Thunder Bay National Marine Sanctuary
These final draft goals were developed based upon input and discussion from the full Planning
Team, Stakeholders, and the public.
Development (P)
Action Goal Target Date Program Input Responsible Program
From Position
1. Develop appropriate 2020 Planning District Planner
education and interpretation Stewardship
trail(s) and viewing locations Park
2. Improve parking at Besser 2016 Planning District Planner
Natural Area Park
Rockport property
Development (NRR)
Action Goal Target Date Program Input Responsible Program
From Position
1. Develop safe access to (and 2020 Planning & District Planner
into) sink-hole(s) where Park
appropriate and feasible
2. Develop parking from west 2020 Planning & District Planner
side of park and trail into the Park
zone
3. Designate and improve trails 2020 Planning & Park Manager
based on above Park
recommendations
Development (DR)
Action Goal Target Date Program Input Responsible Program
From Position
1. Develop an improved access 2016 Planning District Planner
point and parking Park
Development (CL)
Action Goal Target Date Program Input Responsible Program
From Position
1. Follow underlying zone recommendations
RECOMMENDATIONS TO APPROVE
Negwegon SP, Rockport, and Thompson’s Harbor SP
All…I’ m trying this a different way so that I don’ t have to send out a hardcopy for signatures. I need
each of you to respond to this e-mail with your response (yes or no) indicating your recommendation that
the plan be approved, for:
I will make the notation on the second page and include your e-mail recommendations in the appendix for
each plan. Please respond no later than Friday, September 24…sooner if you can. Let me know if you
have any questions…Paul
The two plans I’m comfortable commenting are Thompson’s Harbor and Rockport.
While I agree with the plan scopes and recommendations and give my conditional approval; I feel that in
both case’s it must be recognized and acknowledged that for either plan to be successful the Division
needs to be fiscally committed to making them a reality. I would not endorse the transfer of Rockport
from Forest Management Division to Recreation Division unless the funding is in place to make it a viable
State Park. Field Staff has shrunk to the point that we can no longer continue to set them up for failure by
continuing to give card blanche endorsement of unfunded mandates.
Paul -
I Recommend Approval of the NRTH Phase 2 - Long Range Action Goals Plans with the following
contingencies and observations.
1. Recreation Division has acquired two 80 acre parcels within the park and the maps should be updated
to reflect these additions. The two parcels lie along US 23, east and west of the park's main entry/ exit
from US 23.
2. The plan should reflect that there are two cabins within the park now not just one. The 80 acre
acquisition west of the entry/ exit along US 23 has a cabin that is now for rent.
3. We need to be clear that additional staff and financial resources will be required to effectively achieve
the Long Range Action Goals as outlined.
Rockport Property
1. With the recommendation of administrative transfer of the property in 2011 we should also be
including additional operational staff and financial resources in order to maintain and manage the existing
facility with a commitment to work towards accomplishing the Long Range Action Goals.
Without the required resources it will be difficult to make significant progress as outlined in our NRTH
Phase 2 Long Range Action Goals Plans.
I concur with what Gary and Keith have stated. No other issues to date.
Tom