Physical Science Comission
Physical Science Comission
Physical Science Comission
Directions: Identify the type of IMFA for the following substances and answer the
questions that follow.
Table 1 – Substances and IMFA Types
Substance Type of IMFA
1. CO Dipole-Dipole
1. How do you determine the type of IMFA that occurs in each of the given
substances?
For the first one, carbon monoxide exhibits polar molecules and is also based
on its structure that has an uneven number of distribution of electrons henceforth
it is a dipole-dipole IMFA. While for NH3 it has the existence of hydrogen
bonding to a molecule of nitrogen which makes it highly likable hydrogen
bonding. The last one is CCl4,which has only the type of London Dispersion
Forces.
Objective: Determine the increase or decrease in the intermolecular forces of attraction that takes
place in phase change.
Directions: For each of the phase changes below, choose whether the intermolecular forces
increased or decreased. Write a checkmark (/) under the column for your answer. Then, answer the
critical thinking questions.
solid liquid /
1 liquid solid /
2 liquid gas /
3 gas liquid /
4 solid gas /
5 gas solid /
Directions: The boiling and melting points of HCl and O2 are shown below. Determine the type of
intermolecular force of attraction exhibited by the molecules.
2. How do you relate the melting and boiling point of a substance to its IMFA?
Explain their relationship.
The higher the boiling point and melting point, the stronger the IMFA of the substances. The lower the
vapor pressure of a substance makes it more eligible to acquire higher boiling points. It also makes sense on the
IMFA type that the hydrogen bond would be strongest since its molecules are more stable unlike London
dispersion forces that are unstable.
ACTIVITY 2 – Viscosity
Directions: Follow the procedures below and answer the critical thinking questions.
Materials: water, dishwashing liquid, mug/cup
Procedures:
1. Pour water and dishwashing liquid into the mug/cup.
2. Observe the flow of the substances upon pouring.
2. What can you conclude about the link between the strength of the IMFA and the viscosity of a
substance?
The viscosity of a substance is a vital indication on how strong the IMFA type of a substance is.
Substances (liquids to be specific) with higher resistance to flow have molecules that make their
molecules closer together have higher intermolecular forces. Unlike liquids or substances that flow
instantly have lower IMFA.
ACTIVITY 3 – Capillarity
Directions: Follow the procedures below and answer the critical thinking questions.
Materials:
water from the faucet, cooking oil, alcohol, large shallow container, narrow glass tube or
clear plastic straw, ruler
Procedures:
1. Place about 20 ml (about 4 teaspoonfuls) of water in the shallow container.
2. Hold the narrow tube above the extent of the water within the container.
3. Observe how far the water travels in the tube.
4. Measure the distance traveled by the liquid using a ruler.
5. Repeat steps no. 1-4 for the remaining two substances, remember to wash and dry the dish and
the tube/straw well.
Results:
Record your output in the table below. You do not need to measure the exact distance traveled
by the substance. Describe whether it traveled a short /far distance.
Distance traveled in
Substance
the tube
3 cm
water from the
faucet
5 cm
cooking oil
1 cm
alcohol
The substance that traveled further is the oil because it has lower contact angles. This is due to the
oil’s lower surface tension and making it denser than water. This effect causes the substance to rise
higher in the clear straw than the water and the alcohol.
2. What can you conclude about the link between the strength of the IMFA and capillarity?
The reason there is variation of strengths towards the capillarity actions to different substances is the
temperature of the vapor pressure of the substances (liquids). Stronger IMFA indicates that these
substances acquire more energy to change their IMF and enter the gas phase. The rate of evaporation
will decrease henceforth also the vapor pressure. Compared to weaker IMFA that will apprehend the
increase towards the substance's vapor pressure.
ACTIVITY 4 – Evaporation
Directions: Follow the procedures below and answer the critical thinking questions.
Materials: water and nail polish remover (acetone), shallow bowls, teaspoon (the one being used for
coffee or tea)
Procedures:
1. Measure 20 ml of the given substances by using a teaspoon. Each teaspoon is roughly estimated
with 5mL capacity.
2. Place 20 ml of each of the substances in separate bowls.
3. Move carefully each bowl to a warm/sunny spot.
4. Mark the quantity of liquid in each bowl using a permanent marker.
5. Make several marks at different positions around the bowl.
6. Observe each bowl every minute and note which liquid evaporates quickly.
Results
Record your measurements in the table below. You do not need to measure the specific
level of the liquid. Just write what extent or proportion the liquid evaporates.
Table 5– Substances and Level of Liquid
Water takes a longer time to evaporate than nail polish remover. Since the nail polish
remover is mostly likely acetone and it has weaker intermolecular force that the water. It
can be also seen that water has a higher boiling point than acetone (almost half) that
makes the intermolecular forces greater and the rate of evaporation greater.
2. What can you conclude about the link between the strength of the IMFA and
evaporation?
The conclusion between the strength of the IMFA and evaporation is that the boiling
point is a big factor in determining the strength of the IMFA of the substance. The
higher the boiling point the higher its rate of evaporation which makes the IMFA of the
substance stronger. Compared to weaker types (especially London dispersion forces)
have lower boiling points and lower evaporation rate (in the case of acetone which is
gone immediately).