Essential Hypertension
Essential Hypertension
Essential Hypertension
Seminar
Essential hypertension
Hypertension is a frequent, chronic, age-related disorder, which often entails debilitating cardiovascular and renal
complications. Blood pressure is usually noted in combination with other cardiovascular risk factors. Diagnosis of
hypertension increasingly relies on automated techniques of blood pressure measurement. The pathophysiology of
essential hypertension depends on the primary or secondary inability of the kidney to excrete sodium at a normal
blood pressure. The central nervous system, endocrine factors, the large arteries, and the microcirculation also have
roles in the disorder. Although monogenic forms of blood pressure dysregulation exist, hypertension mostly arises as a
complex quantitative trait that is affected by varying combinations of genetic and environmental factors. Non-
pharmacological strategies can reduce blood pressure. Antihypertensive drug treatment diminishes the complications
of hypertension. The concept that a few major genes will provide the final clue to the pathogenesis of essential
hypertension is an oversimplification that contradicts the heterogeneous nature of this disorder. Further integration of
genetic, molecular, clinical, and epidemiological research could disclose subsets of patients in whom specific
combinations of genetic and environmental factors raise blood pressure, and might lead to more individualised
treatment.
For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group.
SEMINAR
Panel 1: Systolic and diastolic blood pressure thresholds used in clinical medicine
Conventional blood pressure measurement* Automated blood pressure measurement†
Category Boundaries Type of measurement P95‡ Normotension Hypertension
Normotension Ambulatory
Optimum <120/<80 24-h 132/82 <130/<80 >135/85
Normal 120–129/80–84 Daytime 138/87 <135/<85 >140/90
High-normal 130–139/85–89 Night-time 123/74 <120/<70 >125/75
Hypertension Self-recorded
Grade I (mild) 140–159/90–99 Morning 136/85 <135/<85 >140/>90
Subgroup borderline 140–149/90–94 Evening 138/86 <135/<85 >140/>90
Grade II (moderate) 160–179/100–109 Both 137/85 <135/<85 >140/>90
Grade III (severe) >180/>110
Isolated systolic hypertension >140/<90
Subgroup borderline 140–149/<90
Blood pressure thresholds are in mm Hg. *Consensus classification proposed by European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology
guidelines.10 †Classification proposed at the 8th International Consensus Conference on Ambulatory Blood Pressure measurement (Sendai, Japan,
October 2001). ‡Mean of 95th percentiles in subjects who on conventional blood pressure measurement were normotensive in large-scale studies.
Most epidemiologists6,7 share the point of view that the European and American people is coronary heart disease,
relation between risk of cardiovascular complications and whereas in Asian and older people it is stroke.8 Black
blood pressure is continuous, without a threshold above people tend to have higher blood pressure and
which the rate of disease would suddenly increase. The hypertension-related mortality rates than other
main complication of hypertension in middle-aged individuals.9 The Framingham investigators reported that
Men (n=833) Women (n=859)
150
Systolic Conventional BP at home Systolic
Daytime ambulatory BP
140
130
120
Blood pressure (mm Hg)
110
100
Diastolic Diastolic
90
80
70
60
50
4 9 4 9 4 9 4 9 4 9 4 9 4 4 4 9 4 9 4 9 4 9 4 9 4 9 4 4
–1 5–1 0–2 5–2 0–3 5–3 0–4 5–4 0–5 5–5 0–6 5–6 0–7 5–8 –1 –1 –2 –2 –3 –3 –4 –4 –5 –5 –6 –6 –7 –8
10 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
Age group (years)
n=28 44 38 62 78 75 108 84 66 79 61 50 33 27 n=30 45 28 67 67 113 105 82 63 86 64 44 38 27
Figure 1: Systolic and diastolic blood pressures (BP) in 5-year age groups in a representative sample of the population of Noord
Limburg, Belgium
n=number of patients. Closed symbols show the mean of ten conventional blood pressure readings obtained at two visits by the study nurses in the
patients’ homes. Open symbols are mean daytime (10–20 h) ambulatory blood pressure values recorded every 20 min by oscillometric recorders.
For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group.
SEMINAR
For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group.
SEMINAR
For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group.
SEMINAR
can impair coronary blood flow and predispose to coefficients between relatives, usually in the range
myocardial ischaemia. Increased systolic pressure 0·1–0·3. Parent-offspring correlations tend to be smaller
augments cardiac work and can lead to heart failure. The than those among siblings. Heritability estimates,
age-related changes in the elastic properties of the large generally based on complex biometrical assumptions and
arteries and in the wave reflections also account for the Mendelian mechanisms of inheritance, cluster around
greater brachial artery pressure than central aortic 20% in family studies, but in twin studies they vary
pressure in young patients, whereas in the elderly or in around 60%.50
patients with end-stage renal disease4 both values tend to
be similar. Monogenic forms of blood pressure dysregulation
The last decade witnessed tremendous progress in high-
Genetics of human hypertension throughput genomics and proteomics, which allow many
More than 40 years ago, at the time of the controversy samples to be processed in a short time, as well as in cell
between Sir George Pickering and Robert Platt, and molecular biology. Technological advances led to the
researchers had already noticed that hypertension runs in discovery of 17 human genes (panel 2)52 that cause
families. Population-based studies show correlation Mendelian forms of either hypertension or hypotension.
For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group.
SEMINAR
For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group.
SEMINAR
µm
p=0·004 750
are in keeping with renal cross-transplantation
30
experiments.32,33 The adducin hypothesis was further
substantiated by the finding that the blood pressure was 700
20
lowered by a specific inhibitor of the sodium pump99 and
by the observation that hypertensive carriers of the 650 p=0·03
mutated -adducin have reduced cardiovascular 10
(vs DD)
complications if they are treated with diuretics instead of
drugs that do not antagonise the enhanced tubular 0 600
sodium reabsorption.100 4 6 8 10 12 n=44 79 44
Years of follow-up II ID DD
Intervention through lifestyle
In chimpanzees given a vegetarian diet with very low
sodium and high potassium content, salt repletion Proteinuria
95 Serum creatinine 0·12
(10–15 g per day for 20 months) caused a rise in blood
pressure by 33 mm Hg systolic and 10 mm Hg diastolic.101 94
Intervention studies in man102 produced the most 0·11
93
convincing evidence for the role of salt in hypertension. A
meta-analysis of 56 trials accounted for measurement 92
0·10
error of urinary sodium excretion. For a reduction of the
91
µmol /L
g/day
the decline in blood pressure in hypertensive patients 90 0·09
averaged 3·7 mm Hg (95% CI 2·4–5·0) systolic and 89
0·9 mm Hg (–0·1 to 1·8) diastolic.102 The corresponding 0·08
decreases in normotensive subjects were small: 88 p<0·008
p=0·02
1·0 mm Hg (95% CI 0·5–1·6) and 0·1 mm Hg ( –0·3 to (vs ID or DD)
87 (vs DD)
0·5), respectively. In the Dietary Approaches to Stop 0·07
Hypertension (DASH) trial,103 participants were fed meals 86
with varying salt levels for more than 4 weeks. The DASH 85 0·06
diet was rich in fresh fruits, vegetables, and low-fat diary
products. For both the DASH and traditional diets, the n=139 299 155 n=51 117 53
lower the salt intake, the lower was the blood pressure.103 II ID DD II ID DD
In line with the concept of pressure-natriuresis,29 some
studies demonstrated the restoration of a dipping diurnal Figure 4: Association between a complex phenotype and the
blood pressure profile in non-dipping hypertensive ACE I/D polymorphisms in carriers of the mutated -adducin
patients given a low-salt diet.104 However, high sodium Trp allele
intake105-107 associated or not with sodium sensitivity,105,107 Individuals were recruited from a Flemish population in Belgium. The
did not uniformly predict a worse cardiovascular outcome complex phenotype consisted of hypertension, intima-media thickness of
the femoral artery, serum creatinine concentration, and proteinuria. The
in prospective studies. Furthermore, sodium restriction total number of patients investigated for each phenotype amounted to
does not normalise peripheral vascular resistance, the 678,96 380,98 1454,97 and 556,97 respectively. The corresponding
main haemodynamic disturbance in essential hyper- associations in homozygous carriers of the wild-type -adducin were not
tension.108 significant.
Stopping excessive alcohol consumption (>30 mL
ethanol per day)109 and restriction of caloric intake110 are by pressure. However, the main goal of antihypertensive
far the most effective lifestyle measures that consistently treatment is not to reduce blood pressure per se, but to
reduce blood pressure. In an overview of intervention prevent the cardiovascular and renal complications
studies, a 1 kg loss of weight entailed an average blood associated with raised blood pressure, extend longevity,
pressure decrease by 1·6 mm Hg systolic and 1·3 mm Hg and improve quality of life. Several quantitative
diastolic.110 Other lifestyle measures that have the potential overviews2,113–115 provide a detailed account of the outcome
to slightly diminish blood pressure are regular dynamic trials in hypertension, including study design, study
exercise (30–45 min for at least 4 days per week)111 and quality, and the effects of treatments on primary and
abstaining from smoking.112 These lifestyle measures are secondary endpoints.
recommendable because they reduce not only blood
pressure but also cardiovascular risk. Primary prevention
Placebo-controlled trials of antihypertensive drug
Antihypertensive drug treatment treatment in middle-aged and older hypertensive patients
Agencies currently approve new drugs for with predominantly diastolic hypertension showed that a
antihypertensive treatment on the basis of the treatment’s 5–6 mm Hg mean decline in diastolic pressure sustained
potential to decrease blood pressure as an intermediate over 5 years reduced incidence of stroke by nearly 40%
endpoint. Despite substantial evidence of the risk of and that of coronary events by 15%.113 In older patients
isolated systolic hypertension in older people,2 regulations with isolated systolic hypertension, treatment diminished
require lowering of both systolic and diastolic blood the stroke rate by one third and the incidence of coronary
For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group.
SEMINAR
Panel 3: Putative candidate genes or quantitative trait loci implicated in blood pressure regulation
Receptors Cellular or paracrine agents Hormones or vasoactive Other proteins or QTLs
substances
Angiotensin receptors 1b and , , subunits of adducin81,82 Renin, angiotensinogen, angiotensin- SA locus78
257,72 converting enzyme57
Atrial natriuretic peptide 1, 2, 1 isomers of NaK Atrial and brain natriuretic peptides QTLs associated with X- and
receptor/guanylyl cyclase A72 ATPase, Na,K,2Cl-cotransporter83 Y-chromosomes72
events, including sudden death, by nearly 20%.2 Nifedipine Trial on Antiatherosclerotic Therapy, short-
Furthermore, antihypertensive treatment substantially acting nifedipine (n=173) compared with placebo
reduced the risk of heart failure, although estimates of (n=175) reduced the number of new coronary lesions by
benefit varied across trials because of differences in the 28%, but the drug was associated with higher all-cause
clinical criteria used for diagnosis. (14 vs 2) and cardiac mortality (10 vs 2), whereas the
In the Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) incidence of non-fatal cardiac events was similar in both
trial,116 dementia was a pre-specified secondary endpoint. groups (52 vs 44).134
After a median follow-up of 3·9 years, treatment starting
with the dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker Comparative trials
nitrendipine reduced the rate of degenerative dementia by In nine trials, 62 605 hypertensive patients were ran-
55% (p<0·001).116 In view of the null results observed in domised to initial treatment with old drugs (diuretics and
other placebo-controlled studies testing thiazides,117,118 blockers), or new agents (calcium-channel blockers and
blockers,117,118 or monotherapy with the ACE inhibitor converting-enzyme inhibitors). Compared with old drugs,
perindopril,119 the Syst-Eur findings might be due to new agents offered similar overall cardiovascular
chance rather than to blood pressure lowering or the protection, but calcium-channel blockers provided more
inhibition of calcium influx into ischaemic brain reduction in the risk of stroke (13·5%, 95% CI
neurons.120 Thus, the concept that antihypertensive 1·3–24·2%, p=0·03) and less reduction in the risk of
treatment with long-acting dihydropyridines might myocardial infarction (19·2%, 3·5–37·3%, p=0·01).114
protect against dementia needs further testing in These cause-specific outcome results confirm findings of
controlled clinical trials. other investigators,135 but have wide confidence intervals,
and therefore must be interpreted with caution.
Secondary prevention The researchers of the Losartan Intervention for
Several trials119,121-125 have tested the hypothesis that Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension Study (LIFE)136
inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system might be more reported that first-line treatment with losartan, compared
effective than placebo in the secondary prevention of with atenolol, improved outcome over and beyond blood
stroke and the cardiovascular-renal complications of pressure control. They measured achieved blood pressure
hypertension. These drugs diminished the frequency of at the end of follow-up (mean 4·8 years) or just before an
cardiovascular events123,124 and stroke recurrence.119 In event. This definition did not account for the differences
diabetic patients with normoalbuminuria123 or in systolic pressure (higher on atenolol), diastolic pressure
microalbuminuria,125 they also decreased the incidence of (lower on atenolol), or pulse pressure (higher on
overt nephropathy, but they did not reduce the rate of atenolol), which arose during the first year of follow-up.
progression of coronary122 or carotid121 atherosclerosis. In addition, in older patients such as those enrolled in the
Furthermore, in patients with overt nephropathy due to LIFE study (age range 55–80 years, mean age 66·9 years),
diabetes126,127 or hypertension,128 ACE inhibitors128 or blockers improve outcome less than diuretics.137
angiotensin receptor blockers126,127 were more effective The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment
than conventional therapy126 or amlodipine127 in to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)138,139 had 42 424
postponing a doubling of the serum creatinine participants aged 55 years or older with hypertension and
concentration or preventing end-stage renal disease. at least one other cardiovascular risk factor. They were
However, in line with Fleckenstein’s investigations in randomised to first-line antihypertensive therapy
animals,129 results of several trials have shown that long- with chlorthalidone (12·5 to –25·0 mg/day, n=15 255),
acting calcium-channel blockers compared with amlodipine (2·5–10·0 mg/day, n=9067), lisinopril
placebo,130 diuretics131,132 or atenolol133 slowed the (10–40 mg/day, n=9048), or doxazosin (2–8 mg/day,
progression of carotid atherosclerosis. In the International n=9054) with an intended follow-up of 4–8 years. The
For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group.
SEMINAR
primary outcome, a composite of coronary mortality and complications of raised blood pressure. Accordingly, the
non-fatal myocardial infarction, occurred in 3321 need to start treatment increases in the presence of other
patients.138,139 Because of the twofold higher risk of heart cardiovascular risk factors or when absolute risk reaches a
failure on doxazosin compared with chlorthalidone, the specified threshold (for example in the British population,
doxazosin arm was stopped prematurely after a median a 10-year risk of coronary heart disease of 15% or
follow-up of 3·3 years.139 Follow-up of the other groups greater12).
lasted an average of 4·9 years.138 The key finding was that On the basis of evidence from trials, most10,12,13 but not
there were no differences between randomised patients in all guidelines10 suggest that low-dose thiazides might be
the primary outcome and total mortality. Compared with the most cost-effective way to start pharmacological
chlorthalidone, treatment starting with amlodipine was treatment in most patients. However, for each class of
associated with a higher risk of heart failure (table). antihypertensive drugs, compelling indications or
Furthermore, heart failure, stroke, and combined contraindications exist.10,12,13 For instance, blockers or
cardiovascular disease arose more frequently in patients calcium-channel blockers can be used in patients with
allocated doxazosin or lisinopril than in those of the angina pectoris. Stable heart failure is an indication for
chlorthalidone group (table). thiazides, aldosterone receptor blockers,140 blockers,141 or
Interpretation of the ALLHAT results is difficult, ACE inhibitors,124,142 but not for angiotensin receptor
because at randomisation 90% of the patients were blockers.143 A history of myocardial infarction favours the
already on antihypertensive treatment, most often use of blockers144 or ACE inhibitors.124,142 Renal
diuretics. Thus, this trial tested continuation of a diuretic impairment, microalbuminuria, or proteinuria is an
versus switching drug classes. Patients on diuretics with indication for ACE inhibitors123,128 or angiotensin receptor
latent or compensated heart failure were deprived of their blockers.125-128 Systolic hypertension warrants the use of
treatment when they were not randomised to thiazides117 or long-acting dihydropyridines.115 In black
chlorthalidone. Moreover, the achieved systolic pressure people, hypertension responds better to thiazides or
was higher with doxazosin (2·0 mm Hg),139 amlodipine calcium-channel blockers than to inhibitors of the renin
(1·1 mm Hg),138 and lisinopril (2·3 mm Hg) than with system, in terms of both blood pressure reduction138,145 and
chlorthalidone.138,139 Presumably, these factors explain why prevention of complications.138,142 In the absence of renal
the Kaplan-Meier curves started to diverge immediately impairment at the initiation of antihypertensive
after randomisation for heart failure and approximately treatment, all major drug classes equally prevent end-
6 months later also for stroke.115 Furthermore, the stage renal disease.138
sympatholytic agents used for step-up treatment (atenolol, The discussion about which drug class is better suited
clonidine, or reserpine, at the physician’s discretion) led to start antihypertensive therapy is largely obsolete. In
to a somewhat artificial treatment regimen, which does most patients, several drug classes and combinations need
not accord with modern clinical practice.138 to be rotated to optimise treatment at acceptable
Notwithstanding these limitations, ALLHAT stands out tolerance. The blood-pressure lowering activities of ACE
as the largest double-blind trial ever undertaken in inhibitors and blockers are additive to those of thiazides
hypertensive patients. The study was managed and and calcium-channel blockers, and vice-versa.146 Patients
analysed independent of the pharmaceutical industry. younger than 50 years may be started on ACE inhibitors
or blockers and switched to thiazides or calcium-
Guidelines for antihypertensive drug therapy channel blockers if blood pressure remains uncontrolled,
In view of the evidence from clinical trials, guidelines for whereas the reverse order can be used in those older than
the treatment of hypertension10,12,13 are under revision. 50 years.146
However, most experts recommend an integrated The target of antihypertensive treatment is to achieve
approach of risk management to prevent the normal levels of systolic and diastolic blood pressure as
For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group.
SEMINAR
defined in panel 1. In young people and patients with pressure on the risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2001;
diabetes mellitus, previous cardiovascular disorders, 345: 1291–97.
multiple risk factors, or renal insufficiency, blood pressure 7 Thomas F, Bean K, Guize L, Quentzel S, Argyriadis P, Benetos A.
Combined effects of systolic blood pressure and serum cholesterol
must be lowered to within the optimum or normal range, on cardiovascular mortality in young (<55 years) men and women.
if possible. To achieve blood pressure control, more than Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 528–35.
two-thirds of patients need a combination of two or more 8 Wu K, Xie L, Chen D, Chen J. The natural history of borderline
drugs.138 A meta-regression analysis115 included 149 407 hypertension in a Chinese population. J Hum Hypertens 1997; 11:
95–100.
patients randomised in 30 trials. In contrast to recent
9 Gillum RF. The epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in black
suggestions of benefit beyond blood pressure Americans. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1597–98.
lowering,124-127,136 this overview115 suggested that most of the 10 Guidelines Committee. 2003 European Society of Hypertension/
benefit of antihypertensive treatment could be explained European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the Management of
by the decrease in blood pressure rather than by ancillary Arterial Hypertension. J Hypertens 2003 (in press).
drug properties, and therefore shows the need for tight 11 Vasan RS, Larson MG, Leip EP, Kannel WB, Levy D. Assessment
of frequency to progression to hypertension in non-hypertensive
blood pressure control. participants in the Framingham Heart Study: a cohort study. Lancet
2001; 358: 1682–86.
Conclusions 12 Ramsay L, Williams B, Johnston GD, et al. Guidelines for
The causes of essential hypertension are still uncertain. management of hypertension: report of the third working party
of the British Hypertension Society. J Hum Hypertens 1999; 13:
For now, with few exceptions, our therapeutic approach 569–92.
to essential hypertension and its cardiovascular 13 Hypertension Society of Southern Africa endorsed by the Medical
complications remains generic rather than specifically Association of South Africa and the Medical Research Council.
targeted. The notion that the discovery of major genes or Guidelines for the management of hypertension at primary health
interference with a sole pathophysiological mechanism care level. S Afr Med J 1995; 85: 1321–25.
14 O’Brien E, Pickering T, Asmar R, et al. Working Group on Blood
will substantially advance prevention and treatment is an Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension
oversimplification that ignores the heterogeneous nature International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring
of this disorder. Integration of genetic, molecular, clinical, devices in adults. Blood Press Monit 2002; 7: 3–18.
and epidemiological research could disclose the way in 15 Sorof JM, Portman RJ. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the
which genetic and environmental factors lead to different pediatric patient. J Pediatr 2000; 136: 578–86.
16 Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni C, Ciucci A, Pede S, Porcellati
expression of proteins controlling the processes that cause C. Ambulatory pulse pressure. A potent predictor of total
hypertension. This integrated approach may identify cardiovascular risk in hypertension. Hypertension 1998; 32: 983–88.
subsets of patients in whom specific combinations of 17 Ohkubo T, Hozawa A, Nagai K, et al. Prediction of stroke by
genetic and environmental factors raise blood pressure, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring versus screening blood
and could lead to individualised treatment. Blind pressure measurements in a general population: the Ohasama study.
J Hypertens 2000; 18: 847–54.
treatment by trial and error could then change into 18 Staessen JA, Thijs L, Fagard R, et al. Predicting cardiovascular risk
comprehensive and specific intervention with the using conventional vs ambulatory blood pressure in older patients
pathophysiological processes at work in every patient. with systolic hypertension. JAMA 1999; 282: 539–46.
19 Kario K, Pickering TG, Matsuo T, Hoshide S, Schwartz JE,
Contributors Shimada K. Stroke prognosis and abnormal nocturnal blood
All authors conceived and wrote the seminar. pressure falls in older hypertensives. Hypertension 2001; 38:
852–57.
20 Verdecchia P, Staessen JA, White WB, Imai Y, O’Brien ET.
Conflict of interest statement Properly defining white coat hypertension. Eur Heart J 2002; 23:
JAS and WHB did ad-hoc consultancies for pharmaceutical companies 106–09.
with commercial interests in the cardiovascular field. During their
21 Pickering TG. Blood pressure measurement and detection of
lifetimes, they have received funding for studies, seminars, and travel from
hypertension. Lancet 1994; 344: 31–35.
such companies. GB is an adviser to the Prassis Sigma Tau Research
Institute (Milan, Italy). 22 Fagard RH, Staessen JA, Thijs L, et al. Response to antihypertensive
therapy in older patients with sustained and nonsustained systolic
hypertension. Circulation 2000; 102: 1139–44.
Acknowledgments 23 Sega R, Trocino G, Lanzarotti A, et al. Alterations of cardiac
JAS thanks Hilde Celis, Elly Den Hond, Tatiana Kuznetsova, structure in patients with isolated office, ambulatory, or home
Tim Nawrot, Agnieszka Olszanecka, Katarzyna Stolarz, Lutgarde Thijs, hypertension: data from the general population (Pressione Arteriose
and Valérie Tikhonoff. Research cited in this review was partly sponsored Monitorate E Loro Associazioni [PAMELA] Study). Circulation
by the European Union (contracts IC15-CT98-0329-EPOGH and 2002; 104: 1385–92.
QLG1-CT-2000-01137-EURNETGEN). JGW was funded by the
24 Liu JE, Roman MJ, Pini R, Schwartz JE, Pickering TG,
Bilaterale Scientific and Technological Collaboration between the
Devereux RB. Cardiac and arterial target organ damage in adults
People’s Republic of China and Flanders (project BIL02/10). The
with elevated ambulatory and normal office blood pressure. Ann
funding sources had no role in the writing of the article.
Intern Med 1999; 131: 564–72.
25 Chatellier G, Dutrey-Dupagne C, Vaur L, et al. Home self blood
pressure measurement in general practice. The SMART Study.
References
Am J Hypertens 1996; 9: 644–52.
1 Franklin SS, Larson MG, Khan SA, et al. Does the relation 26 Thijs L, Staessen JA, Celis H, et al. The international database of
of blood pressure to coronary heart disease change with aging? self-recorded blood pressures in normotensive and untreated
The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2001; 103: 1245–49. hypertensive subjects. Blood Press Monit 1999; 4: 77–86.
2 Staessen JA, Ga̧sowski J, Wang JG, et al. Risks of untreated and 27 Ohkubo T, Imai Y, Tsuji I, et al. Home blood pressure measurement
treated isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly: meta-analysis has a stronger predictive power for mortality than does screening
of outcome trials. Lancet 2000; 355: 865–72. blood pressure measurement: a population-based observation in
3 Mitchel GF, Moyé LA, Braunwald E, et al. Sphygmomanometrically Ohasama, Japan. J Hypertens 1998; 16: 971–75.
determined pulse pressure is a powerful independent predictor 28 Staessen JA, Byttebier G, Buntinx F, et al. Antihypertensive
of recurrent events after myocardial infarction in patients with treatment based on conventional or ambulatory blood pressure
impaired left ventricular function. Circulation 1997; 96: 4254–60. measurement. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1997; 278:
4 Safar ME, Blacher J, Pannier B, et al. Central pulse pressure 1065–72.
and mortality in end-stage renal disease. Hypertension 2002; 39: 29 Guyton AC. Long-term arterial pressure control: an analysis from
735–38. animal experiments and computer and graphic models. Am J Physiol
5 Staessen JA, Thijs L, O’Brien ET, et al. Ambulatory pulse pressure as 1990; 259: R865–77.
predictor of outcome in older patients with systolic hypertension. 30 Keller G, Zimmer G, Mall G, Ritz E, Amann K. Nephron number
Am J Hypertens 2002; 15 (part 1): 835–43. in patients with primary hypertension. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:
6 Vasan RS, Larson MG, Leip EP, et al. Impact of high-normal blood 101–08.
For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group.
SEMINAR
31 Bianchi G, Ferrari P. Renal factors involved in the pathogenesis of 57 Wang JG, Staessen JA. Genetic polymorphisms in the renin-
genetic forms of hypertension. In: Sassard J, ed. Genetic angiotensin system: relevance for susceptibility to cardiovascular
Hypertension. Colloque INSERM, Montrouge, France: John Libbey disease. Eur J Pharmacol 2000; 410: 289–302.
Eurotext, 1992: 447–58. 58 Whelton PK, Appel LJ, Espeland MA, et al. Sodium reduction and
32 Rettig R, Folberth CG, Stauss H, et al. Hypertension in rats induced weight loss in the treatment of hypertension in older persons. A
by renal grafts from renovascular hypertensive donors. Hypertension randomized controlled trial of nonpharmacologic interventions in the
1990; 15: 429–35. elderly (TONE). JAMA 1998; 279: 839–46.
33 Guidi E, Menghetti D, Milani S, Montagnino G, Palazzi P, 59 Beretta-Piccoli C, Weidmann P, Brown JJ, Davies DL, Lever AF,
Bianchi G. Hypertension may be transplanted with the kidney in Robertson JIS. Body sodium and blood volume state in essential
humans: a long-term historical perspective follow-up of recipients hypertension: abnormal relation of exchangeable sodium to age
grafted with kidneys from donors with or without hypertension in and blood pressure in male patients. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1984;
their families. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996; 7: 1131–38. 6 (suppl 1): S134–42.
34 Orlov SN, Adragna NC, Adarichev VA, Hamet P. Genetic and 60 Mancia G, Grassi G, Giannattasio C, Seravalle G. Sympathetic
biochemical determinants of abnormal monovalent ion transport in activation in the pathogenesis of hypertension and progression of
primary hypertension. Am J Physiol 1999; 276: C511–36. organ damage. Hypertension 1999; 34 (part 2): 724–28.
35 Tripodi G, Valtorta F, Torielli L, et al. Hypertension-associated 61 Schmieder RE, Schächinger H, Messerli FH. Accelerated decline in
point mutations in the adducin alpha and beta subunits affect actin renal perfusion with aging in essential hypertension. Hypertension
cytoskeleton and ion transport. J Clin Invest 1996; 97: 2815–22. 1994; 23: 351–57.
36 Barlassina C, Schork NJ, Manuta P, et al. Synergistic effect of 62 Aviv A. Chronobiology versus biology. Telomeres, essential
-adducin and ACE genes causes blood pressure changes with body hypertension, and vascular aging. Hypertension 2002; 40: 229–32.
sodium and volume expansion. Kidney Int 2000; 57: 1083–90. 63 Magyar CE, Zhang Y, Holstein-Rathlou NH, McDonough AA.
37 Geller DS, Farhi A, Pinkerton N, et al. Activating mineralocorticoid Downstream shift in sodium pump activity along the nephron during
receptor mutation in hypertension exacerbated by pregnancy. Science acute hypertension. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: 2231–40.
2000; 289: 119–23. 64 Muntau AC, Roschinger W, Habich M, et al. Tetrahydrobiopterin as
38 Schoner W. Endogenous cardiac glycosides, a new class of steroid an alternative treatment for mild phenylketonuria. N Engl J Med
hormones. Eur J Biochem 2002; 269: 2440–48. 2002; 347: 2122–32.
39 Manunta P, Messaggio E, Ballabeni C, et al. Plasma ouabain-like 65 Young LE. Imprinting of genes and the Barker hypothesis. Twin Res
factor during acute and chronic changes in sodium balance in 2002; 4: 307–17.
essential hypertension. Hypertension 2001; 38: 198–203. 66 Morris AA, Lightowlers RN. Can paternal mtDNA be inherited?
40 DiBona GF. Nervous kidney. Interaction between renal sympathetic Lancet 2000; 355: 1290–91.
nerves and the renin-angiotensin system in the control of renal 67 Schwartz M, Vissing J. Paternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA.
function. Hypertension 2000; 36: 1083–88. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 576–80.
41 De Angelis C, Haupert GT Jr. Hypoxia triggers release of an 68 Kong A, Gudbjartsson DE, Sainz J, et al. A high-resolution
endogenous inhibitor of Na+-K+-ATPase from midbrain and adrenal. recombination map of the human genome. Nat Genet 2002; 31:
Am J Physiol 1998; 274: F182–88. 241–47.
42 Rossi G, Manunta P, Hamlyn JM, et al. Immunoreactive endogenous 69 Barker DJ, Clark PM. Fetal undernutrition and disease later in life.
ouabain in primary aldosteronism and essential hypertension: Rev Reprod 1997; 2: 105–12.
relationship with plasma renin, aldosterone and blood pressure levels. 70 Surani MZ. Reprogramming of genome function through epigenetic
J Hypertens 1995; 13: 1181–91. inheritance. Nature 2001; 414: 122–27.
43 Ferrari P, Ferrandi M, Torielli L, et al. Antihypertensive compounds 71 Rice T, Rankinen T, Province MA, et al. Genome-wide linkage
that modulate the Na-K pump. In: Jørgensen PL, Karlish SJD, analysis of systolic and diastolic blood pressure: the Québec Family
Maunsbach AB, eds. Na, K-ATPase and related cation pumps: Study. Circulation 2001; 102: 1956–63.
structure, function, and regulatory mechanisms. Ann NY Acad Sci 72 Rapp JP. Genetic analysis of inherited hypertension in the rat.
(in press). Physiol Rev 2000; 80: 135–72.
44 Fink GD. Long-term sympatho-excitatory effect of angiotensin II: a 73 Cooper RS, Luke A, Zhu X, et al. Genome scan among Nigerians
mechanism of spontaneous and renovascular hypertension. linking blood pressure to chromosomes 2, 3, and 19. Hypertension
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 1997; 24: 91–95. 2002; 40: 629–33.
45 Ferguson AV, Washburn DL. Angiotensin II: a peptidergic 74 Rice T, Rankinen T, Chagnon YC, et al. Genomewide linkage scan
neurotransmitter in central autonomic pathways. Prog Neurobiol 1998; of resting blood pressure. HERITAGE Family Study. Hypertension
54: 169–92. 2002; 39: 1037–43.
46 Mulvany MJ. Vascular remodelling of resistance vessels: can we 75 Zimdahl H, Kreitler T, Gösele C, Ganten D, Hübner N. Conserved
define this? Cardiovasc Res 1999; 44: 9–13. synteny in rat and mouse for a blood pressure QTL on human
47 Kvist S, Mulvany MJ. Reduced medication and normalization of chromosome 17. Hypertension 2002; 39: 1050–52.
vascular structure, but continued hypertension in renovascular 76 Tabor HK, Risch NJ, Myers RM. Candidate-gene approaches for
patients after revascularization. Cardiovasc Res 2003; 52: 136–42. studying complex genetic traits: practical considerations. Nat Rev
48 Serné EH, Gans RO, ter Maaten JC, Tangelder GJ, Donker AJ, 2002; 3: 391–97.
Stehouwer CD. Impaired skin capillary recruitment in essential 77 Watt GCM, Harrap SB, Foy CJW, et al. Abnormalities of
hypertension is caused by both functional and structural capillary glucocorticoid metabolism and the renin-angiotensin system: a four-
rarefaction. Hypertension 2001; 38: 238–42. corners approach to the identification of genetic determinants of
49 O’Rourke MF, Staessen JA, Vlachopoulos C, Duprez D, Plante GE. blood pressure. J Hypertens 1992; 10: 473–82.
Clinical applications of arterial stiffness: definitions and reference 78 Iwai N, Ohmichi N, Hanai K, Nakamura Y, Kinoshita M. Human
values. Am J Hypertens 2002; 15: 426–44. SA gene locus as a candidate gene locus for essential hypertension.
50 Luft FC. Twins in cardiovascular genetic research. Hypertension Hypertension 1994; 23: 375–80.
2001; 37 (part 2): 350–56. 79 Siffert W, Rosskopf D, Siffert G, et al. Association of a human G-
51 Geller DS, Rodriguez-Soriano J, Vallo Boado A, et al. Mutations in protein 3 subunit variant with hypertension. Nat Genet 1998; 18:
the mineralocorticoid receptor gene cause autosomal dominant 45–48.
pseudohypoaldosteronism type I. Nat Genet 1998; 19: 279–81. 80 Sharma P, Hingorani A, Jia H, et al. Positive association of tyrosine
52 Lifton RP, Gharavi AG, Geller DS. Molecular mechanisms of human hydroxylase microsatellite marker to essential hypertension.
hypertension. Cell 2001; 104: 545–56. Hypertension 1998; 32: 676–82.
53 Lander E, Kruglyak L. Genetic dissection of complex traits: 81 Ferrandi M, Bianchi G. Genetic mechanisms underlying the
guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nat Genet regulation of urinary sodium excretion and arterial blood pressure:
1995; 11: 241–49. the role of adducin. Acta Physiol Scand 2000; 168: 187–93.
54 Higaki J, Baba S, Katsuya T, et al. Deletion allele of angiotensin- 82 Matsuoka Y, Li X, Bennett V. Adducin: structure, function and
converting enzyme gene increases risk of essential hypertension in regulation. Cell Mol Life Sci 2000; 57: 884–95.
Japanese men. The Suita Study. Circulation 2000; 101: 2060–65. 83 Glorioso N, Filigheddu F, Troffa C, et al. Interaction of the 1-
55 Luft FC, Miller JZ, Grim CE, et al. Salt sensitivity and resistance of Na,K-ATPase and Na,K,2Cl-cotransporter genes in human essential
blood pressure: age and race as factors in physiological responses. hypertension. Hypertension 2001; 38: 204–09.
Hypertension 1991; 17 (suppl I): I·102–08. 84 Tsujita Y, Baba S, Yamauchi R, et al. Association analyses between
56 Price DA, Fisher NDL, Lansang MC, Stevanovic R, Williams GH, genetic polymorphisms of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene and
Hollenberg NK. Renal perfusion in blacks. Alterations caused by hypertension in Japanese: The Suita Study. J Hypertens 2001; 19:
insuppressibility of intrarenal renin with salt. Hypertension 2002; 40: 1941–48.
186–89. 85 Iwai N, Baba S, Mannami T, Ogihara T, Ogata J. Association of a
For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group.
SEMINAR
sodium channel alpha subunit promoter variant with blood pressure. 24-h ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate: a study in 352
J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 80–85. normotensive Danish subjects. Am J Hypertens 1997; 10: 483–91.
86 Julier C, Delépine M, Keavney B, et al. Genetic susceptibility for 113 Collins R, MacMahon S. Blood pressure, antihypertensive drug
human familial essential hypertension in a region of homology with treatment and the risks of stroke and of coronary heart disease.
blood pressure linkage on rat chromosome 10. Hum Mol Genet 1997; Br Med Bull 1994; 50: 272–98.
6: 2077–85. 114 Staessen JA, Wang JG, Thijs L. Cardiovascular prevention and
87 Nakayama T, Soma M, Kanmatsuse K. Organization of the human blood pressure reduction: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2001; 358:
prostacyclin synthase gene and association analysis of a novel CA 1305–15.
repeat in essential hypertension. Adv Exp Med Biol 1997; 433: 115 Staessen JA, Wang JG, Thijs L. Calcium-channel blockade and
127–30. cardiovascular prognosis: recent evidence from clinical outcome
88 Frossard PM, Lestringant GG. Association between a dimorphic site trials. Am J Hypertens 2002; 15: 85S–93S.
on chromosome 12 and clinical diagnosis of hypertension in three 116 Forette F, Seux ML, Staessen JA, et al. The prevention of dementia
independent populations. Clin Genet 1995; 48: 284–87. with antihypertensive treatment. New evidence from the Systolic
89 Wilson AF, Elston RC, Tran LD, Siervogel RM. Use of robust sib- Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Study. Arch Intern Med 2002;
pair method to screen for single-locus, multiple-locus, and 162: 2046–52.
pleiotrophic effects: application to traits related to hypertension. 117 SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Prevention of stroke by
Am J Hum Genet 1991; 48: 862–72. antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic
90 Wu DA, Bu X, Warden CH, et al. Quantitative trait locus mapping hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly
of human blood pressure to a genetic region at or near the Program (SHEP). JAMA 1991; 265: 3255–64.
lipoproteinase gene locus on chromosome 8p22. J Clin Invest 1996; 118 Prince MJ, Bird AS, Blizard RA, Mann AH. Is the cognitive function
97: 2111–18. of older patients affected by antihypertensive treatment? Results from
91 Ying LH, Zee RY, Griffiths LR, Morris BJ. Association of a RFLP 54 months of the Medical Research Council’s treatment trial of
for the insulin receptor gene, but not insulin, with essential hypertension in older adults. BMJ 1996; 312: 801–05.
hypertension. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 1991; 181: 486–92. 119 PROGRESS Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of a perindopril-
92 Hopkins PN, Hunt SC, Jeunemaitre X, et al. Angiotensinogen based blood-pressure-lowering regimen among 6105 individuals with
genotype affects renal and adrenal responses to angiotensin II in prior stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Lancet 2001; 358:
essential hypertension. Circulation 2002; 105: 1921–27. 1033–41.
93 Turner ST, Schwartz GL, Chapman AB, Dallas Hall D, 120 Zipfel GJ, Lee JM, Choi DW. Reducing calcium overload in the
Boerwinkle E. Antihypertensive pharmacogenetics: getting the right ischemic brain. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1543–44.
drug into the right patient. J Hypertens 2001; 19: 1–12. 121 MacMahon S, Sharpe N, Gamble G, et al. Randomized, placebo-
94 Tribut O, Lessard Y, Reymann JM, Allain H, Bentué-Ferrer D. controlled trial of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor,
Pharmacogenomics. Med Sci Monit 2002; 8: RA152–63. ramipril, in patients with coronary or other occlusive arterial disease.
95 Bianchi G, Tripodi G, Casari G, et al. Two point mutations within J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 438–43.
the adducin genes are involved in blood pressure variation. 122 Teo KK, Burton JR, Buller CE, et al. Long-term effects of
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91: 3999–4003. cholesterol lowering and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on
96 Staessen JA, Wang JG, Brand E, et al. Effects of three candidate coronary atherosclerosis. The Simvastatin/Enalapril Coronary
genes on prevalence and incidence of hypertension in a Caucasian Atherosclerosis Trial (SCAT). Circulation 2000; 102: 1748–54.
population. J Hypertens 2001; 19: 1349–58. 123 Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. Effects
97 Wang JG, Staessen JA, Tizzoni L, et al. Renal function in relation to of ramipril on cardiovascular and microvascular outcomes in people
three candidate genes. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 38: 1158–68. with diabetes mellitus: results of the HOPE study and MICRO-
HOPE substudy. Lancet 2000; 355: 253–59.
98 Balkestein EJ, Wang JG, Struijker Boudier HAJ, et al. Carotid and
femoral intima-media thickness in relation to three candidate genes in 124 The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators.
a Caucasian population. J Hypertens 2002; 20: 1551–61. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on
cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:
99 Ferrari P, Ferrandi M, Tripodi G, et al. PST 2238: a new
145–53.
antihypertensive compound that modulates Na,K-ATPase in genetic
hypertension. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1999; 288: 1074–83. 125 Parving HH, Lehnert H, Bröchner-Mortensen J, et al. The effect of
irbesartan on the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients
100 Psaty BM, Smith NL, Hekbert SR, et al. Diuretic therapy, the -
with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 870–78.
adducin gene variant, and the risk of myocardial infarction or stroke
in persons with treated hypertension. JAMA 2002; 287: 1680–90. 126 Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, et al. Effects of losartan on
renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes
101 Denton D, Weisinger R, Mundy NI, et al. The effect of increased salt
and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 861–69.
intake on blood pressure of chimpanzees. Nat Med 1995; 1: 1009–16.
127 Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, et al. Renoprotective effect of
102 Graudal N, Galløe AM, Garred P. Effects of sodium restriction on the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with
blood pressure, renin, aldosterone, catecholamines, cholesterols, and nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:
triglycerides: a meta-analysis. JAMA 1998; 279: 1383–91. 851–60.
103 Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, et al. Effects on blood pressure 128 Agodoa LY, Appel L, Bakris GL, et al. Effect of ramipril vs
of reduced dietary sodium and the dietary approaches to stop amlodipine on renal outcomes in hypertensive nephrosclerosis.
hypertension (DASH) diet. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 3–10. JAMA 2001; 285: 2719–28.
104 Uzu T, Ishikawa K, Fujii T, Nakamura S, Inenaga T, Kimura G. 129 Fleckenstein A, Frey M, Thimm F, Fleckenstein-Grün G. Excessive
Sodium restriction shifts circadian rhythm of blood pressure from mural calcium overload—a predominant causal factor in the
nondipper to dipper in essential hypertension. Circulation 1997; 96: development of stenosing coronary plaques in humans.
1859–62. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1990; 4: 1005–14.
105 Weinberger MC, Fineberg NS, Fineberg SE, Weinberger M. Salt 130 Pitt B, Byington RP, Furberg CD, et al. Effect of amlodipine on the
sensitivity, pulse pressure, and death in normal and hypertensive progression of atherosclerosis and the occurrence of clinical events.
humans. Hypertension 2001; 27 (part 2): 429–32. Circulation 2000; 102: 1503–10.
106 Tuomilehto J, Jousilahti P, Rastenyte D, et al. Urinary sodium 131 Zanchetti A, Agabiti Rosei E, Dal Palù C, et al. The Verapamil in
excretion and cardiovascular mortality in Finland: a prospective Hypertension and Atherosclerosis Study (VHAS): results of long-
study. Lancet 2001; 357: 848–51. term randomized treatment with either verapamil or chlorthalidone
107 Morimoto A, Uzu T, Fujii T, et al. Sodium sensitivity and on carotid intima-media thickness. J Hypertens 1998; 16: 1667–76.
cardiovascular events in patients with essential hypertension. Lancet 132 Simon A, Gariépy J, Moyse D, Levenson J. Differential effects of
1997; 350: 1734–37. nifedipine and co-amilozide on the progression of early carotid wall
108 Omvik P, Lund-Johansen P. Is sodium restriction effective treatment changes. Circulation 2001; 103: 2949–54.
of borderline and mild essential hypertension? A long-term 133 Zanchetti A, Bond G, Hennig M, et al. Calcium antagonist lacidipine
haemodynamic study at rest and during exercise. J Hypertens 1986; 4: slows down progression of asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis.
535–41. Principal results of the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis
109 Beilin LJ. Alcohol, hypertension and cardiovascular disease. (ELZA), a randomized, double-blind, long-term trial. Circulation
J Hypertens 1995; 13: 939–42. 2002; 106: r47–r52.
110 Staessen J, Fagard R, Lijnen P, Amery A. Body weight, sodium 134 Lichtlen PR, Hugenholtz PG, Rafflenbeul W, et al. Retardation of
intake and blood pressure. J Hypertens 1989; 7 (suppl 1): S19–23. coronary artery disease in humans by the calcium-channel blocker
111 Fagard R. Exercise characteristics and the blood pressure response to nifedipine: results of the INTACT Study (International Trial on
dynamic physical training. Med Sci Sports Exercise 2001; 33 (suppl): Antiatherosclerotic Therapy). Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1990; 4:
S484–92. 1047–68.
112 Mikkelsen KL, Wiinberg N, Hoegholm A, et al. Smoking related to 135 Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration.
For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group.
SEMINAR
Effect of ACE inhibitors, calcium antagonists, and other blood morbidity and mortality in patients with sever heart failure.
pressure-lowering drugs: results of prospectively designed N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 709–17.
overviews of randomised trials. Lancet 2000; 356: 1955–64. 141 Stevenson LW. Beta-blockers for stable heart failure. N Engl J Med
136 Dahlöf B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Cardiovascular 2002; 346: 1346–47.
morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint 142 Exner DV, Dries DL, Domanski MJ, Cohn JN. Lesser response to
reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor therapy in black as
atenolol. Lancet 2002; 359: 995–1003. compared with white patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
137 Messerli FH, Grossman E, Goldbourt U. Are beta-blockers N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1351–57.
efficacious as first-line therapy for hypertension in the elderly?
143 Dickstein K, Kjekshus J, and the OPTIMAAL Steering Committee,
A systematic review. JAMA 1998; 279: 1903–07.
for the OPTIMAAL Study Group. Effects of losartan and captopril
138 The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT on mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients after acute
Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high-risk
myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAAL randomised trial. Lancet
hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting
2002; 360: 752–60.
enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic. The
Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart 144 Gheorghiade M, Goldstein S. -blockers in the post-myocardial
Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2003; 288: 2981–97. infarction patient. Circulation 2002; 106: 394–98.
139 The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT 145 Sareli P, Radevski IV, Valtchanova ZP, et al. Efficacy of different
Collaborative Research Group. Major cardiovascular events drug classes used to initiate antihypertensive treatment in black
in hypertensive patients randomized to doxazosin vs chlorthalidone. subjects. Results of a randomized trial in Johannesburg, South
The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Africa. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 965–71.
Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2000; 283: 146 Dickerson JEC, Hingorani AD, Ashby MJ, Palmer CR, Brown MJ.
1967–75. Optimisation of antihypertensive treatment by crossover rotation of
140 Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, et al. The effect of spironolactone on four major classes. Lancet 1999; 353: 2008-2013.
Clinical picture
Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia in identical twins
J Zschocke, J R Schaefer
For personal use. Only reproduce with permission from The Lancet Publishing Group.