The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies
The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies
The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies
com
Abstract:
Nagaland is the homeland of several traditionally distinctive communities who have been collectively identified as the Nagas
– a colonial exonym labelled for them since the British Rule. The colonial administration and the Christian missionaries
played crucial roles in shaping the present political and cultural fate of the people of this region. Since the year 2000, a
spectacular cultural festival under the name of Hornbill festival began to be organized by the State Government of Nagaland
in the month of December every year, with an aim to foster cultural unity among the various constituent groups at home and
to showcase their rich cultural resources to the rest of the world.
This paper aims to dwell on the political, cultural as well as economic aspects of this increasingly popular cultural
extravaganza in Nagaland. It is argued here that Hornbill festival can be seen as the equilibrium of the diverse interests of
its various stakeholders – the local ethnic groups, the Government and the sponsoring private agencies. While on the
economic front it makes the biggest tourism event in Nagaland, on the political front it provides the much-needed space to
demonstrate the unified Naga identity.
1. Introduction
In its tourism literature, Nagaland has branded itself as the “land of festivals”. No matter what the season is there is always a festival
around the corner, thanks to the co-existence of several Naga groups, each having their own distinctive cultural repertoire, in this hilly
state of North-east India. Hornbill festival is a cultural extravaganza, a celebration of all tribes in one venue and it has been coined as
“festival of festivals”. Each tribe has its own way of maintaining its distinctive cultural traditions and customs, through various forms
of performing arts, material culture and food which is an integral part of the festival. The Government of Nagaland, along with the
Directorate of Tourism and the Department of Art and Culture took the initiative of starting the Hornbill festival in 2000 with the aim
to identify and conserve the Naga heritage and also to promote tourism and highlight the socio-cultural panorama of Nagaland.
However, behind this valorized ethnic spectacle of present times, there is a peculiar history of cultural loss and colonial framing of the
Nagas that the state went through during the British rule. The wave of the Christian mission has left a scene of devastation among the
traditional local cultures of the Nagas who have been moulded by them. The Nagas who once had their own strong animistic form of
religion were converted to evangelical Baptism. With the Missionaries working eagerly to educate the Nagas and to bring them up to
the academic civilization, many old cultures were almost abandoned or changed drastically. In the process, old habits and cultures
which were considered as impediment to the progress of men were discouraged and given up. ‘The entry of the Nagas into the written
history of the world can be dated to 24th February 1826 when the Treaty of Yandabo was signed’ (Oppitz et al, 2008, 11). The Nagas
were an autonomous group of people with their own internal sense of belonging to a group. Every group had their own system of
doing things. Little is known about the pre-colonial history of the Naga groups. But, When the British administration entered the Naga
territory, the Nagas had been banded together as tribes. They classified the groups and labelled them with different tribe names.
Though this began over 150 years ago their effects have remained unabated to this day, affecting all the Nagas. Regardless of their
local origins and their specific and collective qualities, it ultimately demands a total redefinition on every dimension: as individuals, as
descent groups, as village communities, as tribes, as a prospective unity of all Nagas (Oppitz et al, 2008, 9).
The Hornbill festival is named after the bird Hornbill. The majestic bird is admired by the Nagas and the admiration for the bird is
symbolically displayed in headgears and ornaments used by the Nagas and worn especially during the festivals. Over the years the
festival has become a unique platform for tourist to witness the cultural diversity of Nagaland. For an outsider Hornbill festival is a
closer understanding of the people, land and culture of Nagaland. It is also an opportunity to experience the food, drinks and the
tradition of Nagaland. Hornbill festival was created to re-assert the Naga identity; which is having a feeling of cultural displacement,
brought about by rapid structural change, social mobility and globalization process. There are 17 tribes and 1400 villages in Nagaland.
Tribal troupes from every tribe are given opportunity to perform. A tribal troupe who has already performed once, its turn to perform
again in the Hornbill festival will come only after a period of more or less than100 years.
Till 2012 Hornbill festival was being organised from 1st – 7th December. But from 2013, the Government extended the number of days
for the celebration of Hornbill Festival from 1st – 10th December. It is held in the Naga Heritage Village at Kisama which is about 12
kilometres from Kohima town. The word Kisama is derived from two villages namely, Kigwema (KI) and Phesama (SA) and MA
which means Village. The Naga Heritage Village is established and commissioned by the State Government of Nagaland. Within the
Naga Heritage Village complex there is a main arena, a Bamboo heritage hall, Bamboo Pavilion, Horti-scape, an Amphitheatre,
Bamboo craft centre, Food court and stalls etc. It also consists of 17 houses of each tribe created with typical architectural designs.
These tribal houses are called Morung. The heritage complex also houses World War II Museum. The observance and participation in
festivals is a significant experience for a contemporary tourist experience. Hornbill festival may be extremely popular for
contemporary tourists but it is traditionally popular with the locals. As cited in the official guide book of Hornbill festival the aim of
the festival is to ‘experience first-hand both sides of the coin- the rich cultural and vibrant heritage of the Nagas and their disposition
in cultural pride arrangement in the face of modernity at the other end of the spectrum. All in all, the Hornbill festival: Festival of
Festivals is the coming together of synergistic elements that make up Nagaland’ (Hornbill Festival Guide Book, 2012).
Hornbill festival is said to be a means to renew connections among the communities and also create networks beyond Nagaland. It is
noteworthy to study this festival as a kind of balance or equilibrium amongst the different interests of its various stakeholders: the
state and distinctive local groups. Certain goals were kept in mind before the formation of Hornbill festival. It seems like a politically
correct move by the government as an aspect of negotiation between the Indian nationalism and Naga identity. A final stage that
Peacock and Rizzo discuss in The Heritage Game (2008) is that the collective interest in the conservation of the past is associated with
the growth in nationalism and the preservation of national identity. ‘Heritage was once the preserve of the few, now it has become the
interest of the many with the growth in domestic and international tourism, and the willingness of the tourist to pay for access to such
heritage place festivals and the like’ (Peacock and Ilde 2008, 8). ‘Heritage often serves as an anchor that provides stability and secures
identity in times of great social unease and confusion.’ (Green and Philip 2007, 70). Hornbill festival serves as a platform to show why
peace is needed for development besides from an economic perspective and tourism sustainability. As Green has argued that, forms of
nostalgia and the representations of the past that they engender are influenced by current political and economic agendas. People in
positions of cultural authority, such as those who work for the government or the tourism industry, wish to articulate a past that can
both instil a sense of national pride and serve as the basis of a viable cultural tourism industry (ibid, 64).
correct-idea of cultural identity is left out. Non-Christian rituals are reduced to a farce; and if a ritual actually is performed, then only
after a loud speaker announcement has stated that it is a practice from the past.’ (Oppitz et al 2008, 71). And yet, the festival makes
the Nagas to view themselves in the perspective of their own history and draw on both the new and the old for their own identity (ibid,
74). An elderly man present at the festival said, “We will go to heaven but we must also carry on with our tradition because it is our
identity.”Longkumer in his article ‘Who sings for the Hornbill? The performance of politics of culture in Nagaland, Northeast India-
Part II’ opines that the constructed and dynamic nature of Naga identity is played out interestingly in the Hornbill festival. For some it
allows a visual glimpse of other tribes, while for others it’s an opportunity to be included into the Naga fold. Having a Morung in the
Hornbill is helpful and legitimizes their claim to be ‘indigenous’ inhabitants of Nagaland – for them territorial indigeneity is the sole
marker of Naga identity, not blood, language or customary practices. Hornbill festival is playing a significant role in the notion of
identity as the Government of Nagaland tries to derive political advantage from the event and strengthen its own position. According
to Stockhausen,
....... The Nagas have a joint history, one they have all gone through in the same way since the colonial era at latest and more
recently since Indian independence. Ultimately this joint search for identity is above all the necessary demand to be heard within the
global field of indigenous strivings to achieve recognition and political self-determination (Oppitz et at 2008, 76)
Today, social media and advertisements have both redefined the way we connect and reshape our identity. Hornbill festival is a way to
bring awareness about preserving the heritage of the region while displaying the Naga identity to the outsiders. “Festivals, whether as
‘traditional’ moments of social celebration or as constructed and highly orchestrated events, have been absorbed into the expansive
stock of ‘products’ that tourist desire” (Picard and Mike Robinson 2006, 2). What has emerged from a local heritage event has turned
into a national and international festival, attracting both the domestic and foreign tourists. Hornbill festival form arena for cultural
creativity. It is, packaging of unique cultural diversity in a creative way. Though the festival is very much a local endeavour with
government, public and village participation, it seems like the larger part of the festival’s concern is to draw attention from beyond the
national boundaries. Using the colourful medium of culture attracts the outside audiences or tourists. Talking about tourist, it is
important to identify what are the expectations of a tourist? The tourists seek authenticity and so the Hornbill festival exposes the
Naga tradition alongside the modern face as an ethnic Naga in the global world system. Authenticity is what drives tourists to the
Hornbill festival. When some tourists were asked why and what made them to come and attend the Hornbill festival, their reply was
that it is because they wanted to witness the authenticity of the Naga culture which they thought was “still” authentic. However, what
is intended to be argued here is that this ‘authenticity’ is more a performed and enacted kind of phenomenon; with a definite set of
interconnections amongst the factors like present/past, modernity/tradition, urban/rural, mainstream/tribal and familiar/exotic. But
isn’t presenting a multifaceted and diverse Naga culture of both tradition and modernity supposed to lose its authenticity? But again
Longkumer argues that the idea of ‘tradition’ and ‘modernity’ are part and parcel of the surroundings and there is no denying that the
two often go hand in hand when discussing the politics of ‘culture’. This particular dimension has become significant in the past few
years and the future of the Hornbill signals the happy co-mingling of both the local and the global. “Nevertheless, the argument of
‘inauthenticity’ and commodification, although very intriguing, does not take into account the potential that the revival, re-
construction or even the invention of festivals holds in terms of replenishing traditions, re-negotiating communal identity and
strengthening group solidarity” (cited in Picard and Mike Robinson 2006, 41).
191). After a visit to the Hornbill festival one will not leave without buying a souvenir. There are varieties of souvenirs ranging from
low price to high price such as, Nagaland Land of Festivals stickers, Hornbill Festival of Festivals badges, local arts and crafts, textiles
et cetera. Whilst commodifying the past for the future developments the perceptions of authenticity may change which will have an
effect on the local community themselves.
Every year a new theme, game or contest is added to give the festival a new flavour. Themes are made in order to classify the different
activities and since there are many activities happening at different places, it helps the tourists in shaping their itineraries. Using a
theme can also provide several interpretations of the same space at the same time attracting the tourists. For instance, the Department
of Art and Culture presents the cultural extravaganza under the theme “Unity” where altogether 17 troupes from Nagaland shall
present a glimpse into the rich cultural songs, dances and traditions of the tribes of Nagaland. Apart from the cultural shows there are
other programmes like presenting collection of Naga traditional motifs and designs on contemporary wear under the theme of
“Celebrating Naga Textile Art & Design” or Glocal Film Fest with the theme of “Global Local Meet”, Photo contest under the theme
“Colours of Nagaland” etc. Besides all these the tourist can also participate in indigenous games and sports like Greased Bamboo Pole
Climbing, Naga Wrestling, and Naga King Chili Eating Contest and so on.
5. Conclusion
Hornbill Festival no doubt is an event created by the Government to showcase the Naga cultural heritage. While the festival has a
good feel for traditions, it has also come to hang on with the dynamics and apparent of the contemporary activities. It is orchestrated
and enacts factors like past with present, modern and tradition etc. Hornbill festival seems more organised and less spontaneous,
highly choreographed and managed which gives the visitors the impression that it is more of a show. Authenticity is staged though the
tourists as well as the locals don’t seem to mind it. However, the question remains are, for whom the Hornbill Festival is really for? Is
it staged and performed for the few elites with reserved seats who may or may not have an upper hand in organizing this orchestrated
celebration? When the main aim of the festival is to bring all the tribes of Nagaland under one umbrella, why create a new umbrella.
Perhaps the festival needs to reflect more on the theme of the festival “unity”, which provides the much-needed space to demonstrate
the unified Naga and re-enactment of shared Naga identity.
The government of Nagaland is planning to turn the Hornbill Festival into a commercial hub with the aim of recreating a ‘Mini
Nagaland’. A permanent shopping arcade to sell and promote indigenous produce with an adjacent food court, complete with all
traditional delicacies. The association of various media partners, sponsors, event partners’ etc. makes the festival a commercial event
along with their own advertisement while associating with the festival. Economic forces may be one of the reasons that push such
contemporary festivals for commercialization. It seems the Government have turned to advertisers as a revenue source. The
authenticity of festivals is regarded not only as a cultural value, but also as an economic generating opportunity. Thus, Hornbill
festival is a festival of coming together of all the elements that make up Nagaland, displaying its unique identity [which is contested
and constructed]. The festival also gives a glimpse into the cultural diversity of the entire Northeast as the participants from the
neighbouring states like Assam, Manipur, Mizoram, Meghalaya, Tripura and Arunachal performs and showcase their culture. In the
recent years the festival has also gone truly global with dance troupes from Korea, Myanmar and Thailand showcasing their cultures
and this provides a platform for the Nagas in promoting cultural exchange, whilst at the same time it is a great boost for the tourism
industry.
Hornbill festival is a negotiated balance between the local and the national/global, between imagined past and enforced modernity.
For the state, this carries the message that peace is essential for development; and for the Naga groups, this provides the platform to
stage their revived identities. At a critical level, it also demonstrates the duality of heritage – that heritage is simultaneously political
as well as economic in terms of the functions it renders. If Hornbill festival is a sacred stage for enacting identities for the Nagas, it is
also a market of cultural commodities for the others.
6. References
i. Green, Garth L. & Scher, Philip W. Eds (2007). Trinidad Carnival: The Cultural Politica of a Transnational Festival. Indiana
University Press, Bloomington.
ii. Longkumer, Arkotong. (2013). “Who sings for the Hornbill? The performance and politics of culture in Nagaland, Northeast
India- Part II.” The South Asianist Blog, viewed 20 May 2013, http://thesouthasianistblog.co.uk/2013/02/19/
iii. Oppitz, et al. Eds. (2008). Naga Identities: Changing Local Cultures in the Northeast of India. Snoeck Publishers, Gent.
iv. Peacock, Alan &Rizzo, Ilde. (2008). The Heritage Game: Economics, Policy and Practice. Oxford University Press, New
York.
v. Picard, David &Robinson, Mike. Eds. (2006). Festival, Tourism and Social Change: Remaking Worlds. Channel View
Publications, U.K.
vi. Smith, Melanie K. &Robinson, Mike. Eds. (2006). Cultural Tourism in a Changing World: Politics, Participation and (Re)
presentation. Channel View Publications, U.K.
vii. Strinati, Dominic. (2004). An Introduction to the Theories of Popular Culture. Routledge, London.
viii. The Directorate of Tourism. Govt. Of Nagaland. (2012). Hornbill Festival Guide Book. The Directorate of Tourism, Kohima.
ix. Weaver, John A. (2005). Popular Culture Primer. Peter Lang Publishing, New York.