Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 748 views

    A Compare and Contrast Classical Conditioning With Operant Conditioning

    Uploaded by

    Adrian Joen Rapsing
    Classical conditioning and operant conditioning are both forms of associative learning. Classical conditioning is based on involuntary reflexive behavior and involves pairing a stimulus with a reflex, while operant conditioning involves voluntary behaviors and uses reinforcement or punishment after a behavior. Both involve acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery, generalization, and discrimination. Tolman's purposive behaviorism saw behavior as holistic, purposive, and cognitive, while Bandura's social learning theory focuses on learning through social observation, imitation, and context.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved

    A Compare and Contrast Classical Conditioning With Operant Conditioning

    Uploaded by

    Adrian Joen Rapsing
    748 views2 pages
    Classical conditioning and operant conditioning are both forms of associative learning. Classical conditioning is based on involuntary reflexive behavior and involves pairing a stimulus with a reflex, while operant conditioning involves voluntary behaviors and uses reinforcement or punishment after a behavior. Both involve acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery, generalization, and discrimination. Tolman's purposive behaviorism saw behavior as holistic, purposive, and cognitive, while Bandura's social learning theory focuses on learning through social observation, imitation, and context.

    Original Title

    BEED

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Classical conditioning and operant conditioning are both forms of associative learning. Classical conditioning is based on involuntary reflexive behavior and involves pairing a stimulus with a reflex, while operant conditioning involves voluntary behaviors and uses reinforcement or punishment after a behavior. Both involve acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery, generalization, and discrimination. Tolman's purposive behaviorism saw behavior as holistic, purposive, and cognitive, while Bandura's social learning theory focuses on learning through social observation, imitation, and context.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    748 views2 pages

    A Compare and Contrast Classical Conditioning With Operant Conditioning

    Uploaded by

    Adrian Joen Rapsing
    Classical conditioning and operant conditioning are both forms of associative learning. Classical conditioning is based on involuntary reflexive behavior and involves pairing a stimulus with a reflex, while operant conditioning involves voluntary behaviors and uses reinforcement or punishment after a behavior. Both involve acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery, generalization, and discrimination. Tolman's purposive behaviorism saw behavior as holistic, purposive, and cognitive, while Bandura's social learning theory focuses on learning through social observation, imitation, and context.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    of 2

     A COMPARE AND CONTRAST CLASSICAL CONDITIONING

    WITH OPERANT CONDITIONING.

    CLASSICAL CONDITIONING SIMILARITIES


    OPERANT CONDITIONING
     Based on involuntary reflexive  Forms of associative  Involves voluntary behavioral
    behavior. learning. outcomes.
     Are influenced by biology  Reinforcement or punishment is
     A signal is given before the reflect. and cognitive processes.
    given after the behavior.
     Involved acquisition,  Discover by Skinner.
     Discovered by Pavlov. extinction, spontaneous,
    recovery, generalization  Behavior comes first.
    and discrimination.
     Stimulus comes first.

     B. ILLUSTRATE AND WRITE YOUR UNDERSTANDING ABOUT


    THE PRIMARY LAWS
    PRIMARY LAW

    Edward Lee Thorndike (1874-1949) was a professor of American Psychology, a disciple of William James who
    developed a series of laws about trial and error learning. Thorndike's theories are considered as the precursors of
    American behaviorism that would find its maximum exponent in the figure of Skinner, father of operant
    conditioning.

    Edward Thorndike developed the first three laws of learning: readiness, exercise, and effect. He set also the
    law of effect which means that any behavior that is followed by pleasant consequences is likely to be repeated, and
    any behavior followed by unpleasant consequences is likely to be avoided.

    Thorndike’s theory consists of three primary laws: (1) law of effect – responses to a situation which are
    followed by a rewarding state of affairs will be strengthened and become habitual responses to that situation, (2)
    law of readiness – a series of responses can be chained together to satisfy some goal which will result in annoyance
    if blocked, and (3) law of exercise – connections become strengthened with practice and weakened when practice is
    discontinued. A corollary of the law of effect was that responses that reduce the likelihood of achieving a rewarding
    state (i.e., punishments, failures) will decrease in strength.
     C. DIFFERENTIATE TOLMAN'S PURPOSIVE BEHAVIORISM WITH
    BANDURA'S SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY

    NEO
    BEHAVIORISM

    Tolman’s
    Purposive Albert
    Behavioris Banduras
    m Learning

    -Purposive -Tolman saw -Social Learning -Bandura


    behaviorism has behavior as Theory focuses asserts that
    also been holistic, on the learning most human
    referred to purposive, and that occurs behavior is
    assign learning cognitive. within a social learned through
    theory and is context. observation,
    often seen as the imitation, and
    link between
    behaviorism and

    NOTE: Learning is always purposive and goal directed, according to "Tolman


    and Bandura", cognitive process promotes learning to pupils, teaching alternative
    new concepts learner may have their interest to fill-in the knowledge they want.

    You might also like