The document outlines an assessment rubric for grading student performance in a lab based on several criteria. It provides a 5-point scale to evaluate students on attributes like apparatus setup, following experimental procedures, taking accurate readings and calculations, validating experiments, fulfilling assigned duties, and contributing as part of a team. The highest scores are for students who can setup apparatus correctly, follow procedures, take accurate measurements, perform supporting calculations through different methods, validate experiments by identifying reasons for differences, perform all duties assigned and assist others.
The document outlines an assessment rubric for grading student performance in a lab based on several criteria. It provides a 5-point scale to evaluate students on attributes like apparatus setup, following experimental procedures, taking accurate readings and calculations, validating experiments, fulfilling assigned duties, and contributing as part of a team. The highest scores are for students who can setup apparatus correctly, follow procedures, take accurate measurements, perform supporting calculations through different methods, validate experiments by identifying reasons for differences, perform all duties assigned and assist others.
The document outlines an assessment rubric for grading student performance in a lab based on several criteria. It provides a 5-point scale to evaluate students on attributes like apparatus setup, following experimental procedures, taking accurate readings and calculations, validating experiments, fulfilling assigned duties, and contributing as part of a team. The highest scores are for students who can setup apparatus correctly, follow procedures, take accurate measurements, perform supporting calculations through different methods, validate experiments by identifying reasons for differences, perform all duties assigned and assist others.
The document outlines an assessment rubric for grading student performance in a lab based on several criteria. It provides a 5-point scale to evaluate students on attributes like apparatus setup, following experimental procedures, taking accurate readings and calculations, validating experiments, fulfilling assigned duties, and contributing as part of a team. The highest scores are for students who can setup apparatus correctly, follow procedures, take accurate measurements, perform supporting calculations through different methods, validate experiments by identifying reasons for differences, perform all duties assigned and assist others.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
Assessment Rubric and Grading of Lab Performance
The performance of students in the lab is based on the following criteria
PLO 2: PROBLEM ANALYSIS
No progress Min Benchmark Basics Good Excellent
Attributes 1 2 3 4 5 Aware of process Aware of the Aware of process Aware of process Mostly unaware of and follow it. Setup process but lacks but lack competency and follow it rightly Apparatus Setup the process of competency in in setting up as well as can setup apparatus rightly setting up apparatus and extend its following procedure apparatus apparatus application. Follows procedure Experimental Does not Follows procedure Follows procedure Poor in following appropriately and Procedure comprehend but not completely appropriately devise innovation Lack proper competency in Can take readings Take readings Unable to note taking readings, Can take readings, Readings and and tabulate accurately, tabulate readings and hence unable to properly tabulate properly properly but cannot properly and Calculations of cannot perform tabulate and comes perform supporting and perform perform supporting Results supporting across difficulty in supporting calculations by right calculations through calculations performing calculations method different methods supporting calculations
PLO 4: INVESTIGATION
No progress Min Benchmark Basics Good Excellent
Attributes 1 2 3 4 5 Can sometimes Affectively utilizes Can mostly validate Can validate the validate the engineering the experiment by experiment by experiment by knowledge to find identifying reasons identifying reasons Investigation No progress identifying reasons for difference in for difference in reasons for for difference in difference in experimental and experimental and experimental and experimental and theoretical data theoretical data theoretical data theoretical data
PLO 9: INDIVIDUAL AND TEAM WORK
No progress Min Benchmark Basics Good Excellent
Attributes 1 2 3 4 5 Performs all duties Inconsistently Fulfill Assigned Does not performs performs duties that assigned and No progress performs duties that Duties any duties assigned are assigned actively assists are assigned others Always does Rarely does the Usually does Shares in work of Always relies on assigned work No progress assigned work often assigned work rarely team other to do the work without having to needs reminding needs reminding reminded