EnS 115 Group Presentation Final Output

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

EnS 15: ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY

FINAL OUTPUT

Instructor: May Joy G. Vasquez


Group Presentation
• Individual and Group Activity/ Presentation
• 5 people per group
• Q&A (5 questions )
• Duration of Forum/Mini-Conference: limit presentation to 30-45 minutes
(condensed version of the reference material); limit slides to 15
• Will present via Google Classroom or Video yourself/group while doing the
report.
• Deadline: To be posted.
SUBMISSIONS AND FORM

Materials To Be Used
• PowerPoint Presentations
• Videos
• Articles
• Others
Summary of Forum/Conference – by the presentors
• (Compiled material in PDF format)
METHOD OF DELIVERY
Role and Function in the Team
1. Facilitator (Professor) – assigns students to speak on the topic based on an earlier identified
Case study.
2. Reporter/Speaker – reads the reference material ahead of time, summarizes the contents,
prepares an abridged version of the paper
3. Moderator (to be assigned by the Professor) - facilitates the Q&A (5-10 minutes) after the
report: Q&A to clarify the key takeaways of the reference material
4. Audience (all students) – reads the report material before delivery, takes note of the key
points made during the discussion; prepares two questions each about the topic (for submission
to the professor before the report begins); the questions shall be reviewed, filtered, and read
by the moderator for the reporter to answer
GROUP PRESENTATION TOPICS
• Group 1: Case Study III* - The Pasig River, Philippines: Water Pollution Control - A Guide
to the Use of Water Quality Management Principles
Link: https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/resourcesquality/wpccasestudy3.pdf
• Group 2: Surface Water Characteristics in the Vicinity of Abandoned Mercury Mine Site
in Puerto Princesa City, Philippines
Link:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342802317_Surface_Water_Characteristics_in_t
he_Vicinity_of_Abandoned_Mercury_Mine_Site_in_Puerto_Princesa_City_Philippines
• Group 3: A Survey of the ocean’s plastic waste problem, and some policy
developments of the Philippines
Link:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336370886_A_survey_of_the_oce
an's_plastic_waste_problem_and_some_policy_developments_of_the_Philip
pines
• Group 4: Eutrophic Conditions during the 2010 fish kill in Bolinao and Anda,
Pangasinan, Philippines
Link:
https://www.academia.edu/6425952/Eutrophic_conditions_during_the_2010
_fish_kill_in_Bolinao_and_Anda_Pangasinan_Philippines
• Group 5: Assessment of Quantity and Quality of Microplastics in the Sediments, Waters,
Oysters, and Selected Fish Species in Key Sites Along the Bombong Estuary and the
Coastal Waters of Ticalan in San Juan, Batangas
Link:
assessment_of_quantity_and_quality_of_microplastics_in_sediments_.pdf (dost.gov.ph)
• Group 6: Pesticide use among farmers in Mindanao, Southern Philippines
Link:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276280143_Pesticide_use_among_farmers_in_
Mindanao_Southern_Philippines
GROUPS
GROUP 1 GROUP 2 GROUP 3
ALIAKBAR, JORHAINA O. SINTIK, VIMAR M. AMOR, HAROLD B.

BAYATE, JEANREY RUMBAOA, JESSA MAY A. PEREZ, MARBELYN D.

BUEN, MONTAZEL S. MATEO, JERRIEMIE S. BUNDAL, JOSHUA N.

MADJIM, SHERLYN M. ESTRADA, DON RAFAEL P. JACENA, MARIA KATHLEENE N.

GROUP 4 GROUP 5 GROUP 6


SALI, NARCISO JR E. BANAWAS, MANSOR D. JUMANTOC, JANICE LALYN L.

BERNAL, MILCHA F. JACOBA, MILKY K. MAMOD, REXSAM A.

MARIANO, NOVEMAR D. CABODILLO, HELFRED F. OSHITA, SAYROLLA A.


MABUGAT, WILFREDO I. MAMOD, JORDANI A. LIBRON, RICHARD R

GONZAGA, JAYNOVIE E.
Written Report Evaluation Rubric
Grading Rubric: Audio/Video Presentation
Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs
Improvement
Concept The video clearly The video demonstrates The video demonstrates a The video does not
demonstrates a key key concepts. previous concept. demonstrate a clear
concept concept.
Design The quality and The quality and The quality and The quality and
materials in the materials in the materials in the materials in the
video are very video adequately video lacked some video are not
well organized organized and organization and organized and
and somewhat clear. 50% clear. lack clarity.
understandable.

Participation All members The majority of Half of the group Only one person
demonstrate an the members did most of the demonstrated an
active role in the demonstrate an work. active role.
process. active role.

Final Product Final product Product Final product Final product l Final product
looks professional looks decent and required more looks unrefined
and the concepts the concepts were revisions and the and the concepts
were visibly somewhat concepts were were not
demonstrated. demonstrated. not clearly demonstrated
demonstrated.

You might also like