Cf680c2 Engine History
Cf680c2 Engine History
Cf680c2 Engine History
A
ll CF6 engines have a classic making major changes to the core to power their 747, 767, A300, A310
two-shaft design. The engine and thanks to its higher and MD-11 fleets. This allowed
configuration mounts the low- bypass ratio, its fuel economy was General Electric to increase its market
pressure compressor (LPC) and low better than many of its competitors. share and take number one position
pressure turbine (LPT) on the same A later version, the CF6-6D1 was from Pratt & Whitney in the
shaft as the intake fan. To better offered with thrust increased to widebody market.
understand the great success of the 40,300 lb. The -50E is the same basic engine
CF6-80 model, it is necessary to Subsequently, the CF6-50C series as the -50C, but it has variable stator
review its predecessors in the CF6 was designed and produced for the vanes in the HPC. The -50E is rated
range. The CF6 has its origins in the DC-10-30 and the first variants of the at 51,800lbs, has a bypass ratio of
TF39 military engine, the power plant Airbus A300B, the -B2 and -B4 4.24, powers the DC-10-30 and was
for the Galaxy C-5 military transport versions. However, few parts were the first CF6 variant to power the
aircraft. Experience gained by GE on common with the CF6-6 since major 747. The -50C2B is the highest thrust
the TF39 was invaluable to the CF6 changes had been made to core variant of the -50 series and is rated
programme since it allowed the engine engine design and configuration. at 53,200lbs. This version powers the
to be exposed to many of its initial Thanks to the improved highest gross weight variant of the
teething problems, through a large aerodynamics, the HPC was shortened DC-10-30 and higher gross weight
number of flight hours under rigorous from 16 to 14 stages and the LPC models of the 747-200.
operating conditions. These problems stages were reduced to three. The LPC The next engine variant to come
were subsequently overcome. was also reduced by one stage and out of the CF6 stable was the CF6-
The first of the CF6 engines was turbine cooling was also improved. 80A. The CF6-80A series did not
the CF6-6D which had sole supplier Fan size was not changed from the feature any major changes to core
status on the DC-10-10 and was rated original CF6-6 series but the primary engine configuration fan diameter
at 39,300 lb thrust. The CF6-6 series flow had to be increased from the CF6-50 However, earlier
has four LPC stages, 16 HPC stages, considerably, thus decreasing the models received criticism for being
two HPT stages and five LPT stages. bypass ratio to 4.26. The -50C was long, giving the engine a tendency
With a fan diameter of 86.4 inches rated at 50,400 lb. for the shafts to bend in use. The
the -6D achieves a bypass ratio of Since the CF6 was the only engine consequence of this excessive
5.7. GE designed the CF6 to have available to power the DC-10-10, most bending was significant rubbing of
reserve capability for growth without DC-10 operators later selected the CF6 blade tips resulting in a high rate of
and bushing wear. In both instances, 2001, GE has required a regular on-
the vane is free to move in the flow wing inspection to be carried and
path, either generating an engine stall replacement of the complete set of
or physically breaking-up and blades at first shop visit. The latest
liberating debris into the gas path blades have improved geometry and
which leads to engine damage. Since materials to reduce stress and cracking
2002, GE has provided newly designed and IASG believes that half of the
For the potential lessor and
VSV lever arms and bushings. IASG engine population has been modified to
experience shows that around 30 per the new standard. debt provider, the CF6-80C2
cent of the engine population still have appears to be a robust asset
the old configuration. For pre- More recent issues include: with a strong market base
modification engines, a repetitive on- ■ Stage 11 HPC rear case wear: Wear
wing inspection has to be carried out. has been found on the HPC case at the which has a very good credit
Bushings to the new design can be stage 11 vane rail track. This problem rating. Since the FADEC family
installed only in some locations with can lead to vane separation and internal is more recent and flexible, its
the engine on-wing although IASG engine damage. An on-wing inspection
believes that this practice only provides is required and an inspection has to be value is proportionally higher.
minor benefit. carried out when the engine is removed
■ HPC stage 3 to 5 blades: A new for a shop visit. The fix for this
design of blades was introduced into problem is the introduction of
service by GE and experience has differently coated stage 11 vanes.
shown that these are susceptible to ■ Inlet gearbox (IGB) Teflon seal: A
impact damage and when FOD is similar problem of IDG Teflon seal
experienced they can fracture and cause leakage and failure has been
further internal engine damage. Since experienced by CF6-50 operators. Some
■ Design
■ Manufacturing
■ Testing
■ Market Analysis
■ MRO
■ Leasing
■ Trading
■ Spare Parts
■ Software
The next edition will be published in September 2007
and will be relevant for all of 2008. It will benefit from
bonus distribution at the Aero-Engine Expo 2007 plus
all AIC engine-related conferences in 2008.
If you want to advertise in The Engine Yearbook 2008
please contact Simon Barker on Tel: +44 (0) 207 932 5583
or E-mail: [email protected]