FNCE 6018 Group Project: Hedging at Porsche

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

SMU Classification: Restricted

FNCE 6018 Group Project: Hedging at Porsche

Analyse the following questions for the case study.

1. Why does Porsche hedge its foreign exchange exposure? Does it make sense, from the
perspective of shareholders, for Porsche to hedge? Does it make sense from management’s
prospective? Are there potential differences in interest between management and shareholders
regarding the hedging policy?
(20 marks)

2. Suppose it is end of November 2007, and Porsche views its hedging strategy for the cash flows it
expects to obtain from vehicle sales in North America during the calendar year 2009. Assume
that Porsche entertains three scenarios: The expected volume of North American sales in 2009 is
32750 vehicles. The low-sales scenario is 30% lower than the expected sales volume, and the
high-sales scenarios is 30% higher than the expected sales volume. Assume in each scenario that
the average sales price per vehicle is $90,000 and that all sales are realized at the end of
November 2009. All variable costs incurred by producing and shipping an additional vehicle to be
sold in North America in 2009 are billed in euros and amount to 60K euros per vehicle.
Characterize how Porsche’s Euro cash flows, net of variable costs, obtained from its North
American sales depend on the spot exchange rate that prevails at the end of November 2009, if:
a) Porsche does not hedge its currency exposure at all;
b) Porsche hedges by selling forward US$ equal to the amount of expected 2009 sales with a
two-year forward contract;
c) Porsche hedges by buying two-year European at-the-money put options on US$ (providing to
Porsche the right to sell US$, receiving Euro, at the strike exchange rate) in sufficient quantity
to have the right to sell an amount of US$ equal to expected 2009 sales.
(20 marks)

3. Based on your analysis of question 2, what’s your view on the foreign exchange hedging strategy
and the hedging instruments chosen by Porsche? If you were Porsche’s CEO, would you
implement a different strategy? If yes, why? If no, why not?
(15 marks)

4. How might Porsche’s ownership structure influence the hedging strategy pursued by
management?
(15 marks)

5. Do you think Porsche’s strategy of using options to acquire a stake in VW (instead of buying stocks
directly) is a sensible one? Or do you agree with critics who argued that Porsche was speculating
with shareholders’ money and that it had become a “hedge fund” that neglected its core business?
(20 marks)

6. Write up a report. Your report should not be more than 8 pages excluding content page &
appendices (if any). Your report must be typed with minimum font size must be 11, 1.5-line
spacing, written in good English and in a professionally acceptable format. The remaining 10
marks will be scored based on the quality of the written report in terms of language, formatting,
structure, contents flow, labelling of figures, charts, tables, etc.
a. Written report quality (10 marks)
SMU Classification: Restricted

Grading Rubric Max Score Your score


Q1 20%
Q2 20%
Q3 15%
Q4 15%
Q5 20%
Quality of report 10%
Total 100%

Important remarks:

1. Late report will have 20% deducted from the final score. No exception will be made.
2. Plagiarism is considered as cheating. The report will receive 0% if 20% or more of the contents
are found to be similar (including attempts at rephrasing) to other reports. No exception will
be made.
3. Free riding is an offence. Group members reported to be free-riders & found to be culpable
will be given 0% on the group project. There will be a peer evaluation component where each
group member evaluates the contribution of other group members (excluding the evaluator)
to the overall written report.
4. The entire group project carries 20% of your overall grade. The written report will constitute
15%, while the peer evaluation will constitute 5%.

You might also like