Annotated Bibliograph1
Annotated Bibliograph1
Annotated Bibliograph1
1. Zhang, D., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom
learning? Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of the Acm, 47(5),
75–79. https://doi.org/10.1145/986213.986216
In this article, Zhang, Zhou, and Nunamaker’s purpose was to provide a wide perspective of the
radical changes of education in the recent years with the inclusion of new technologies in the
classrooms. They indicated that those radical changes are fueling the transition to a new and
modern era referred as e-learning experience. They explored the advances of e-learning
technologies and practices and compared the effectiveness of e-learning and traditional learning
experiences which leads e-learning as an alternative to traditional classrooms. They provided a
deep analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of both teaching/learning approaches and
argued the need of professional development to ensure that educators are equipped with the latest
information and skills to succeed in a digital classroom. A discussion of a Virtual Mentor
concept is discussed to reduce existing problems and develop interactive and flexible e-learning
experience for educator and students. They discussed the concepts with a series of principles that
has as a purpose lead the student actively construct their knowledge based on their experiences
and with the help of e-learning students will be provided with many opportunities to construct
their learning in a supporting, resource-rich, student-centered, and interactive learning.
2. Srinivasan, R. (2020, September 30). The positives of virtual learning that nobody is
talking about. Retrieved April 16, 2021, from https://news.utexas.edu/2020/09/30/the-
positives-of-virtual-learning-that-nobody-is-talking-about/?
fbclid=IwAR2rpqzPjpJlhxJMereCnJO2xPiJ_gOopsc01cZmQCqfmEicT7kDRJxIPiQ
This online article written by Srinivasan hopes to expand the positiveness of virtual learning to
exhaust students in institutions of higher learning. The implementation of new and innovated
technologies features in the classrooms such as chat windows will help democratize todays
classroom. Not only that but features like audio-only mode help eliminate pernicious issues
related to disabilities or issues that are prevalent in an in-person classroom setting. Through the
use of virtual classrooms student are able to bring their full selves and technologies encourage
students to enhance their engagement and learning outcomes. According to Srinivasan the key of
a virtual classrooms is to create virtual classrooms that are create and student-friendly that can
eliminate differences among virtual classrooms and in-person classrooms.
3. Gecer, A., & Dag, F. (2012). A blended learning experience. Educational Sciences:
Theory and Practice, 12(1), 438–442.
Gecer and Dag’s purpose of their study was to concentrate on the views of the students towards
Computing II course that was applied and modify with blending of face to face and e-learning
methods. The author’s agreed that the incorporation of this learning approach provides positive
effects on learning experiences of students and at the same time enables important learning
environments that provides useful and necessary information about the nature of the course.
They also discussed important advantages of this approach such as, allowing students to follow
the course content online will enable them to exchange their ideas and options between teacher-
student and student-students and encourage students to express themselves better. The study is
compared and supported with a similar study conducted by Yildirim and Şimşek (2006) that
share similarities with Gecer and Dag’s ideas. The data from this study was gathered from the
participation of 67 freshmen students who were enrolled in Mathematics courses. Through a
semi-structured survey of open and closed ended questions, about the comparison and
advantages of the different aspects of the courses (face-to-face and online learning) the results
indicated that the implementation of courses that incorporate digital activities had positive effect
on students. Results of this study, indicated that blending learning environments help students
take responsibility about their own learning and support active participation.
3. Iaosanurak, C., Chanchalor, S., & Murphy, E. (2016). Social and emotional learning
around technology in a cross-cultural, elementary classroom. Education and Information
Technologies : The Official Journal of the Ifip Technical Committee on Education, 21(6),
1639–1662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9406-4
Iaosanurak, Chanchalor, and Murphy examined the impact on how social and emotional
learning around technology involved more than just digital tools. Their study focused on a design
and test of an intervention plan to elementary-aged student to promote social and emotional
learning around technology. This concept place emphasis on tools that allowed for tightly
structured tasks, problem solving skills, and social behaviors. In the SEL model technology plans
a facilitative and supported role. The main purpose of the study was to demonstrate that social
and emotional learning involves more than just technology tools, it includes activities and
scaffolds that work in conjunction with technology that involves collaborative and social
interactions as opposed to individual work. Data was gathered from the participation of 23 boys
and girls from an elementary in Thailand and Cambodia. The tools, activities and scaffolds relied
on in the intervention were designed specifically to promote social and emotional learning
around technology. Before and after the intervention, participating students were tested using the
Thai Emotional Intelligence Screening Test (TEIST). Some of the learning tools used included
animates stories, discussion forums, mind maps and learning journals that promoted social and
emotional problems and were designed to attract the attention of elementary students since there
were digital resources. Results indicated that SEL was fostered and developed by activities such
as collaborative interaction, dialogue, reflection, problem-solving and decision-making in a face-
to-face context supported by digital tools such as networked computers, digital animations, a
learning management system, discussion forum, a mind-mapping tool and a learning journal
indicated a positive impact on the participants.
4. Miller, S. C., McIntyre, C. J., & Lindt, S. F. (2020). Engaging technology in elementary
school: flipgrid's potential. Childhood Education, 96(3), 62–69.
Miller, McIntyre, and Lindt discussed the effectiveness of engaging digital tools such as Flipgrid
technology to encourage students to discuss, reflect and showcase their learning. The study
focused the relation of Depth of Knowledge (DoK) model with Flipgrid and its combination
when teacher aligned their objectives with this model to engage students in deeper learning and
motivate then to activate critical thinking and problem-solving skills. The research indicate that
DoK is essential for learning because it provides a solid model that help students apply learning
to real world context or to encourage students to explain a new concept to another person using
tools like Flipgrid. The authors provide strategies and techniques on the implementation of
Flipgrid in the Elementary classrooms and their alignment to each of the four levels of the DoK
model. An overview of each level (recall/reproduce, basic application of skills and concepts,
strategic thinking, and extended thinking) along with the use of Flipgrid project help provide
specific ideas on how to be implemented across the curriculum to enhance students learning and
motivation in the elementary level demonstrating the positive impact of emerging technologies in
the classrooms.