A Low Cost LED Based Spectrometer: Journal of The Chinese Chemical Society, 2006, 53, 1067-1072
A Low Cost LED Based Spectrometer: Journal of The Chinese Chemical Society, 2006, 53, 1067-1072
A Low Cost LED Based Spectrometer: Journal of The Chinese Chemical Society, 2006, 53, 1067-1072
A low cost LED based spectrometer is described. This LED based spectrometer could be operated as a
standalone instrument or under PC control via serial link. A total of seven wavelength selections are avail-
able by the plug-and-measure LED light module. With the seven wavelength selections, the LED based
spectrometer could provide qualitative visible absorption spectra that predict the absorption maximum.
Based upon the qualitative visible spectra, quantitative photometric information could be obtained.
Panreac, Inc. The LED was bought from RS Components control software written in Visual Basic 6.0 was used to set
and local parts vendors. The TCS230 sensor chips were the operation mode for the experiment. The spectra of the
bought from TAOS, Inc. The PIC Micro 16F877A and plug-and-measure LED light sources are shown in Fig.
electronic components were sourced from local electronic 2(a). The emission peaks for the LED light sources were
parts vendors. 389 nm, 407 nm, 462 nm, 527 nm, 572 nm, 587 nm and 620
nm. The actual device hardware is shown in Fig. 2(b), 2(c),
The Circuit and Hardware Tuning 2(d).
Fig. 1 is the circuit design for the LED based spec- The LED light intensity and the emission bandwidth
trometer. The TCS230 chip from TAOS, Inc. was used as could be adjusted by the current-limiting resistor. Because
photo-detector. Output-frequency scaling and photodiode the LED light intensity and the emission bandwidth would
color selection is set by a dip-switch connected to the S0, affect the measured absorbance by the LED based spec-
S1, S2, S3 input pin on the sensor chip. The sensor fre- trometer, calibration against a commercial spectrometer
quency output is received by a PIC Micro 16F877A micro- with standard solutions is necessary for the LED based
controller via PORTC.2. The signal after processing by a spectrometer. The best empirical value for the current-lim-
microcontroller is displayed on the LCD and transmitted to iting resistor is set by fitting the absorbance spectra ob-
a PC via a RS232 serial connection. Thus the LED based tained by a LED based spectrometer to that obtained by a
spectrometer could operate standalone or be controlled by a Ocean Optics USB 2000 spectrometer. A series of standard
PC to have a better visualized view of the obtained data. PC solutions to calibrate the LED based spectrometer were
prepared by adding 5 ml Universal pH Indicator to 2 mL The resistor value for each LED light source was de-
buffer solutions from pH 1 to pH 13. The spectra for the 13 termined by comparing it with an Ocean Optics USB 2000
standard solutions obtained by Ocean Optics USB 2000 spectrometer. Herein the spectra of different buffer solu-
spectrometer are shown in Fig. 3(a). The obtained spectra tions from pH 1 to pH 13 were measured, and the resistor
serve as reference for setting the value of LED current- value was tuned to best fit the spectra obtained by the USB
limiting resistors. The best value of the current-limiting re- 2000 spectrometer. After the resistor value was fine tuned
sistor was set by comparing the spectra obtained from a for the LED based spectrometer, four indicator solutions:
USB 2000 spectrometer. Fig. 3(b) shows the best value for Bromocresol Purple, Bromocresol Green, Phenol Red and
a blue LED (462 nm) was 2 kW. Thymol Blue were measured and compared again with the
USB 2000 spectrometer. This is the testing procedure for
Experiment Procedure for Spectra Mode testing the performance of the spectra mode.
Typical LEDs have FWHM values of about 25 nm
and a typical FWHM molecular absorption band is over 50 Experiment Procedure for Photometric Mode
nm. Thus it is possible is use a discrete LED absorbance A series of the Universal Indicator solution from 1.25
measurement to approximate the absorbance spectra of mo- ml to 200 ml is dropped to 2 mL pH 7 buffer solution. The
lecular absorption.
Fig. 2a. Spectra of LED light source. Fig. 2c. LED spectrometer with cover removed.
Fig. 2b. Plug-and-measure LED light source module Fig. 2d. LED spectrometer with cover in measurement
and TCS230 detector module. mode.
1070 J. Chin. Chem. Soc., Vol. 53, No. 5, 2006 Yeh and Tseng
absorbance variation caused by concentration difference of spaced closely. For the absorption spectra of Thymol Blue,
indicator solution is compared with the USB 2000 spec- the LED based spectrometer didn’t predict the absorption
trometer for the photometric mode. maximum very well. The reason was that in the present
spectrometer design there was no 430 nm LED light source.
For the absorption spectra of Phenol Red, the LED based
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION spectrometer didn’t produce very good absorption spectra.
This is caused by the large FWHM values of the blue LED
Spectra Mode (peak 462 nm) and green LED (peak 527 nm). According to
The absorption spectra obtained by the LED based Beer’s law, a polychromatic light source would give a large
spectrometer are shown in Fig. 4. For the Bromocresol deviation compared to a monochromatic light.14 The lack
Purple and Bromocresol Green dye solutions, the LED of a good 430 nm LED light source plus the lack of a light
based spectrometer showed very good qualitative agree- source between blue LED and green LED also contributed
ment with the USB 2000 spectrometer and provided a to the ill-behaved absorption spectra.
good prediction of their absorbance spectra. In the spectra
region for the maximum absorption of Bromocresol Pur- Photometric Mode
ple and Bromocresol Green, the LED light sources are Comparison of photometric performance with an
Ocean Optics USB 2000 spectrometer is shown in Fig. 5. the Ocean Optics USB 2000 spectrometer for the full mea-
The LED based spectrometer showed a similar trend with surement range. For the concentration range from 10 ml to
80 ml, the agreement with the USB 2000 spectrometer was
very good for the LED based spectrometer. The LED based
spectrometer could yield very good quantitative results for
absorbance values under 0.8. In daily practice, absorbance
measurements seldom exceed 1.0. Many commercial in-
struments also fail at high absorbance values. The devia-
tion of the LED based spectrometer in the high absorbance
region could be due to the polychromatic nature of the LED
light sources.14
CONCLUSIONS
Fig. 4c. Comparison of Thymol Blue spectral data
with a USB 2000 spectrometer
Both spectra mode and photometric mode for the
LED based spectrometer had shown very comparable re-
sults compared to the Ocean Optics USB 2000 spectrome-
ter. With low cost electronic components, it is possible to
build a cost effective instrument for resource limited labs.
The electronic components for a LED based spectrometer
had a total cost of about US$ 20. Commercial instruments
usually would cost more than US$ 1,000. In this respect,
the LED based spectrometer was a very cost-effective in-
strument. Inclusion of a kinetic mode for a LED based
spectrometer is possible by rewriting the firmware in a PIC
microcontroller. This kind of LED based spectrometer will
be very useful for both autonomous environment monitor-
ing and educational purposes. The capability of the present
Fig. 4d. Comparison of Phenol Red spectral data with a LED based spectrometer can be further extended by incor-
USB 2000 spectrometer. porating more LEDs with different wavelengths.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
Fig. 5. Comparison of photometric data with a USB
2000 spectrometer.
1. Diamond, D. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 279A-286A.
1072 J. Chin. Chem. Soc., Vol. 53, No. 5, 2006 Yeh and Tseng
2. Sequeira, M.; Bowden, M.; Minogue, E.; Diamond, D. 9. Hauser, P. C.; Rupasinghe, T. W. T.; Tan, R. Chimia 1995,
Talanta 2002, 56, 355-363. 49, 492-494.
3. Dasgupta, P. K.; Bellamy, H. S.; Liu, H. G.; Lopez, J. L.; 10. Hauser, P. C.; Rupasinghe, T. W. T. Fresensius J. Anal.
Loree, E. L.; Morris, K.; Petersen, K.; Mir, K. A. Talanta Chem. 1997, 357, 1056.
1993, 40, 53-74. 11. Hamilton, J. R.; White, J. S.; Nakhleh, M. B. J. Chem. Educ.
4. Dasgupta, P. K.; Eom, I.-Y.; Morris, K. J.; Li, J. Anal. Chim. 1996, 73, 1052-1054.
Acta 2003, 500, 337-364. 12. Knagge, K.; Raftery, D. Chem. Educator 2002, 7, 371-375.
5. Kostov, Y.; Rao, G. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1999, 70, 4466. 13. Cantrell, K. M.; Ingle, Jr. J. D. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 27.
6. Kostov, Y.; Rao, G. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2000, 71, 4361. 14. Skoog, D. A.; Holler, F. J.; Nieman, T. A. Principles of In-
7. Kostov, Y.; Rao, G. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2003, 74, 4129. strumental Analysis; 5th ed.; Harcourt Brace: Orlando, FL,
8. Hauser, P. C.; Rupasinghe, T. W. T.; Cates, N. E. Talanta 1998.
1995, 42, 605-612.